@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>compulsory figure (figure skating)</gloss>
+<field>&figskt;</field>
+<gloss>compulsory figure</gloss>

daijs jwiki wiki

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>compulsory figure</gloss>
+<gloss>compulsory figure (figure skating)</gloss>
+<gloss>school figure</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コンパルソリー・フィギュア</reb>

gg5, prog

@@ -25,2 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>turning rightist</gloss>
-<gloss>being on the (political) right</gloss>
+<gloss>leaning to the (political) right</gloss>
+<gloss>rightist tendency</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming right-wing</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>rightist</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1290880">左傾・2</xref>
+<gloss>turning rightist</gloss>
+<gloss>being on the (political) right</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr/s, gg5

Not a noun.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>little</gloss>
-<gloss>few</gloss>
+<gloss>exceedingly little</gloss>
+<gloss>exceedingly few</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>paltry</gloss>
+<gloss>puny</gloss>

daijr/s

Not a noun.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1196250">過大</xref>

daijr/s

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1196230">過多</xref>

gg5, daijr/s

Not a noun.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>too little</gloss>
+<gloss>insufficient</gloss>

https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15056060.html
4歳の孫が夫婦間での呼び方そのままに、父親の名前を呼び捨てにし、母親のことは「○○ちゃん」と呼んだ。
https://dot.asahi.com/dot/2019122000068.html?page=1
「くん」「ちゃん」をクリアしたら、次はいよいよ「呼び捨て」だ。
https://komachi.yomiuri.co.jp/topics/id/716134/
自分の子はちゃん付け、他人の子は呼び捨てのママの心理は？
https://w.grapps.me/love/286908/
今まで「呼び捨て」で呼んでいた彼氏が、「ちゃん」付けで呼ぶようになったとしたら、
https://www.sankei.com/article/20211016-QCE3KDYC4VKUFBKVVECAG6IZUQ/
小学校３年生の息子がいます。子供同士、呼び捨てで呼び合っているのがとても気になります。
... その友達のお母さんの前でも呼び捨てで呼ぶので、申し訳ない気持ちになったりします。男の子には「くん」を、女の子には「さん」をつけて、呼び合ってほしいと思う私は古い考えでしょうか？　息子も以前は「ちゃん」や「くん」で呼んでいたように思います。やめさせるにはどうすればいいでしょうか。
https://www.sankei.com/article/20161103-X3BDHZIHUNMXHB3NISUNZL5IZM/6/
先生　９月９日付の朝日新聞朝刊に「愛ちゃん　台湾・江選手と結婚」という記事があったが、読んだら「リオデジャネイロ五輪の卓球女子団体で銅メダルに輝いた福原愛（２７）＝ＡＮＡ＝が今月初め…」と、呼び捨てにしているんだ。

Well, the point you are making is plainly wrong, "-chan" is clearly among the suffixes that "yobisute" indicates you're not using. Daijisen says "「君」「様」「さん」_など_の敬称" (my emphasis). Koj mentions 殿・様・さん・君. That doesn't mean we need to include "殿" or さま here, it's not an exhaustive list.
The wording you're suggesting doesn't make sense to me either, "even '-sama'" seems to imply that "-sama" would be the least polite of the suffixes listed, when it's quite the opposite.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

〈呼（び）／よび／ヨビ〉〈捨（て）／すて／ステ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 呼び捨て │ 270,111 │ 97.5% │
│ 呼びすて │   3,284 │  1.2% │ - add, sK
│ 呼捨て　 │   1,605 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ 呼び捨　 │     412 │  0.1% │
│ 呼びステ │     104 │  0.0% │
│ 呼捨　　 │      71 │  0.0% │
│ よび捨て │      48 │  0.0% │
│ よびすて │   1,111 │  0.4% │
│ ヨビステ │     169 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>呼びすて</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

Not necessarily honorofic - 君, ちゃん
I think the "such as" was helpful

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

お日様	402254	51.1%
お日さま	97365	12.4%
お陽さま	18489	2.3%
お陽様	6008	0.8%
御日様	923	0.1%
御陽様	274	0.0%
おひさま	262441	33.3%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-rams:
 お日様    	402254
 お日さま	 97365
 お陽さま	 18489
 お陽様   	  6008
 御日様    	   923
 御陽様    	   274
 御日さま	No matches
 御陽さま	No matches

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>御日様</keb>
+<keb>お陽さま</keb>
@@ -17 +17,4 @@
-<keb>お陽さま</keb>
+<keb>御日様</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御陽様</keb>

https://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/000121/files/637_13341.html

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お陽様</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お陽さま</keb>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>the sun</gloss>
+<gloss>the Sun</gloss>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>learning to the (political) left</gloss>
+<gloss>leaning to the (political) left</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>learning to the (political) left</gloss>
@@ -20 +23 @@
-<gloss>becoming radical</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming left-wing</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1171100">右傾・2</xref>

G-ngrams

Seen in a game

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>腫れあがる</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>腫上がる</keb>

gg5 daijs

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>books</gloss>
+<gloss>book</gloss>
+<gloss>volume</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 親切　　 │ 4,036,391 │ 99.9% │
│ 深切　　 │     3,445 │  0.1% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, shinmeikai, mentioned in meikyo)
│ しんせつ │    10,362 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

adj glosses
more glosses

@@ -23,2 +23,6 @@
-<gloss>kindness</gloss>
-<gloss>gentleness</gloss>
+<gloss>kind</gloss>
+<gloss>gentle</gloss>
+<gloss>considerate</gloss>
+<gloss>generous</gloss>
+<gloss>friendly</gloss>
+<gloss>nice</gloss>

gg5
G-ngrams: much more often adj-na than n

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,4 +19,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>honesty</gloss>
-<gloss>integrity</gloss>
-<gloss>frankness</gloss>
+<gloss>honest</gloss>
+<gloss>frank</gloss>
+<gloss>candid</gloss>
+<gloss>straightforward</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Astronomical objects such as the Sun, Saturn, 
etc. will have capitals, but moonlight and 
sunshine will not.
(policy)

Should we capitalise this as we did with "Moon"? It's capitalised on Wikipedia.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>sun</gloss>
+<gloss>Sun</gloss>

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>solar</gloss>

まえつぼ is correctly written as 前壺, so this sense is correctly written as 壺.  so if anything, this belongs as a sense of 壺 with 坪 as [iK].  however, this sense of 壺 doesn't seem to appear in any kokugo and it's not clear that it's common enough to be worth recording, so i would probably pass on it

https://www.gofuku-kawachiya.co.jp/diary/1041
https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/坪下がり+草履/

More evidence of usage.

I have a problem with this edit. Only that quoted source has 坪/つぼ with that meaning. It doesn't have that meaning in any kokugo or kanwa that I have checked. Also, the kokugos have 7 or 8 senses for 坪/つぼ which we don't because (a) no-one has proposed them, and (b) they're fairly rare. If we were to add this sense, I'd want to see the ones in the kokugos put in ahead of it. I've just approved 前つぼ without 坪 because it couldn't really be verified. I'll wait a short while, but I think this sense can't go in solo and certainly without better support.

https://bbth.co.jp/kisste/post-2070

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843424">前坪</xref>
+<gloss>frontal strap of a Japanese sandal</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think units of measurement are counters too.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>

1坪＝3.3㎡で計算すると誤差がでる
http://www.tsukubaland.co.jp/ledge/tubo.html
実は「３．３０５７８５１２３９６・・・・と果てしなく続きます。

How big is your field?
https://www.mam.co.jp/english/saien/select/2.php
1 tsubo = 3.3 square meters

https://www.arrowsrealty.com/column/what-does-tsubo-mean
Relationship between tsubo and square meter
One tsubo is about 3.30578 square meters and one square meter is about 0.3025 tsubo. In reality, the fraction continues endlessly, but ... this "tsubo" is often written as 3.3 square meters

Comments at 一寸 and 坪当たり. I think other numbers here listed as "approx." should also be rounded, but I'll stick to [1] at the moment, which is fairly well supported in mainstream literature (in English and Japanese).

Major Japanese real estate website:
https://www.homes.co.jp/cont/living/living_00088/
1坪は約3.30578平方メートル、1平方メートルは約0.3025坪です。
but:
この「坪」については3.3平方メートルと書かれている場合も多いのですが...

And note, the error between 3.31 and 3.30578 is nearly as large as 3.30 and 3.30578.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.3 square meters</gloss>

meikyo

what a great system.  not at all confusing

@@ -17 +17,16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tsubo</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of fabric or paper area, approx. 9.18 square centimeters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tsubo</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of leather or tile area, approx. 918 square centimeters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1838020">立坪</xref>
+<gloss>cubic tsubo (approx. 6 cubic metres)</gloss>

I don't think units of measurement are counters too.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>

daijr/s, meikyo, shinmeikai

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1304200">賛成</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1304200">賛成</xref>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr, gg5

Sense 2 isn't [vs].

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>dissension</gloss>
+<gloss>dissent</gloss>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -33,2 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>vice versa</gloss>
-<gloss>contrast</gloss>
+<gloss>inverse</gloss>
+<gloss>contrary</gloss>

The reason to supply a reference should be obvious: you are the only one who knows the reference that supports your suggested edit.

There are numerous possible references out there, and if the first one we check does not support your edit, then we have to keep checking through references until we find one that does.

It is a matter of simple courtesy, and not an onerous burden.  If you're taking time to submit a change, then take the slight additional time to supply rationale or a reference.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>appear</gloss>
+<gloss>appeal</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

The references box is there for a reason. I don't know why you're complaining.
We're not asking a lot from you.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>appear</gloss>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>thing that separates something from the rest</gloss>
+<gloss>attractiveness</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>taste (e.g. of victory)</gloss>

daijisen daijirin

You have plenty of sources at your hand. Isn't your "job" (I get it's a volunteer thing but still) as an editor to check edits against 
those? Even if I provided a reference, you would still have to double check it, so I don't think it's the case that I'm creating a whole lot 
of work for you.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>thing that separates one from the rest</gloss>
+<gloss>thing that separates something from the rest</gloss>

Please provide some.

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>style</gloss>
+<gloss>uniqueness</gloss>
+<gloss>thing that separates one from the rest</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1541570">有能</xref>
+<gloss>incompetence</gloss>
@@ -21 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>incompetence</gloss>
+<gloss>inability</gloss>
+<gloss>incapacity</gloss>

daijs
"バイト先が無給で研修強制しようとしてるから労基にチクろうと思う"
"さっさとやれ無能 "
http://totalmatomedia.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-1385.html

only one sense in daijs but it makes sense to separate in 
English

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>incompetent person</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog

Dropped noun gloss.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1530780">無能・1</xref>
@@ -20,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>competent</gloss>
+<gloss>talented</gloss>
@@ -22 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>skill</gloss>

i don't see what this adds.

the note already explains the usage, and the "something" does not seem helpful on the first gloss because that sense is referring to emotions.  e.g., "to show signs of being a sexual predator" would fit in under sense 1; however it should actually be sense 2

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>to show signs of being</gloss>
+<gloss>to show signs of being (something)</gloss>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to behave as if one were</gloss>
+<gloss>to behave as if one were (something)</gloss>

中辞典: 〈…と感じる〉 feel; 〈したいと思う〉 want; 《文》 desire; 〈ふりをする〉 pretend
ルミナス: (…したいと思う) want [他]; desire [他]; (…しやすい) be apt to do…; (ふりをする) pretend [他]

A month on and no more feedback.
Both those other JEs seem to be backing sense 3. I'll make the note on sense 1 a bit more general.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>on adj-stem to represent a third party's apparent emotion</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on adj-stem to represent another's apparent emotion</s_inf>

I don't think "to represent a third party's apparent 
emotion" is entirely correct, but we might want to check 
with a native speaker. I'm under the impression that you 
can use it to describe the feelings of a second party as 
well, e.g. "お前、めっちゃ悔しがってるやん"　or "お前、かな
り欲しがってるじゃん" (both of these get a handful of 
google hits)
_
Also I think sense 3 doesn't belong here because it's 
strictly about the たがる usage. I can't come up with any 
usage without た(い) with this meaning.

Trimming & standardizing.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adj. stem</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem or noun</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adj. stem or noun</s_inf>

Probably don't need the second half of the note.
Daijr says "一部の名詞に付いて" for sense 2.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem to represent another's apparent emotion</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adjective stem</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>on nouns also</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adjective stem or noun</s_inf>

(a) I don't mind the note on sense 1, but I liked "on adj-stem" for brevity.
(b) possibly a note and xref would help sense 2.

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1928810">得意がる・とくいがる</xref>
+<s_inf>on nouns also</s_inf>

is the full note necessary on sense 1?  seems obvious from the glosses.  and doesn't sense 2 (at a minimum) also apply to nouns?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>the North Pacific</gloss>
+<gloss>North Pacific</gloss>

See rejected 2702990. 北大平洋 gets 8k hits, so it's a not-uncommon typo.

@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>北大平洋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

daij, gg5

Expanding.

@@ -12,3 +12,13 @@
-<gloss>unit of land measurement</gloss>
-<gloss>3.95 square yards</gloss>
-<gloss>3.31 square metres (meters)</gloss>
+<gloss>bu</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of area, approx. 3.31 square metres</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>commission</gloss>
+<gloss>percentage</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>following a unit of area (e.g. 町, 段, 畝)</s_inf>
+<gloss>exactly</gloss>
+<gloss>precisely</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2540600">見られる・みられる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2540600">見られる・みられる・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2835071">見られる・みられる・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2835071">見られる・みられる・2</xref>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1259290">見る・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2540600">見られる・みられる・3</xref>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1259290">見る</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1259290">見る・1</xref>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>school figure (figure skating)</gloss>
+<field>&figskt;</field>
+<gloss>school figure</gloss>

daijs jwiki wiki

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>school figure</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1053210">コンパルソリーフィギュア</xref>
+<gloss>school figure (figure skating)</gloss>
+<gloss>compulsory figure</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スクール・フィギュア</reb>

Entry created

... or remove the v1 tag?

@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@
-<gloss>believed to</gloss>
-<gloss>expected to</gloss>
-<gloss>feared to</gloss>
-<gloss>poised to</gloss>
-<gloss>considered to</gloss>
-<gloss>likely to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be believed to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be expected to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be feared to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be poised to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be considered to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be likely to</gloss>

A couple of months have passed without further discussion. I'll revert this to the original, and create a draft new entry for 見られる. We can then decide which to keep.
To see 10 example sentences for this go to http://www.edrdg.org/cgi-bin/wwwjdic/wwwjdic?10 and search for と見られ. They are linked to this entry.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>見られる</keb>
+<keb>と見られる</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>みられる</reb>
+<reb>とみられる</reb>
@@ -13,19 +13,7 @@
-<gloss>to be seen</gloss>
-<gloss>to be in sight</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<gloss>to be able to see</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<gloss>to see</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<gloss>to be worth watching</gloss>
-<gloss>to be worth seeing</gloss>
+<s_inf>often preceded by verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>believed to</gloss>
+<gloss>expected to</gloss>
+<gloss>feared to</gloss>
+<gloss>poised to</gloss>
+<gloss>considered to</gloss>
+<gloss>likely to</gloss>

Eijiro:
発癌性があると見られる be seen as a cause of cancer
大幅に鈍ると見られている : be expected to slow significantly
核心要素と見られる〔〜の〕 : be considered core elements of
GG5:
台所が火元と見られている． The fire is thought to have started in the kitchen.
この選挙では野党が有利と見られている． The Opposition is 「seen ［thought, considered］ to have the advantage in the current election.

I think this has got right away from Hendrik's 2010 entry for と見られる. I can see と見られる in heaps of places, including in Eijiro sentences, GG5 examples, Tanaka sentences, etc. 
I think it is better to leave the と見られる entry pretty much as it was, probably changing it "often preceded by a verb", and add a new entry for 見られる alone.

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>to be able to see</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

See 呼び捨て

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama"</gloss>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Again, refer to the 呼び捨て entry. No need to make the exact same argument in different entries.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama"</gloss>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 呼び捨てにし │ 35,508 │ 99.3% │
│ 呼捨てにし　 │    198 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ よびすてにし │     36 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Always "[person]を呼び捨てにする". I think these glosses work better.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>呼捨てにする</keb>
@@ -13,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to call address someone without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to use someone's name without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

This edit has been sitting here for a couple of months.

なおいい	39730
なおよい	18389

Just an additional comment. The N-gram counts are interesting. GG5 only has なおよい in examples, and there are two Tanaka sentences using なおよい and none using なおいい.
Getting them combined will be a plus.

We don't have the 良い form in the adj-ix version (I overlooked it here.)
This topic is under discussion, but I thought I'd raise this entry as it is the only 良い/adj-ix one. Don't approve it yet.

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>なお良い</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>尚良い</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835070">五十日・いか・1</xref>

koj daij

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>rice cake used for the celebration of a child's fiftieth day</gloss>
+<gloss>mochi used for the celebration of a child's fiftieth day</gloss>

daij koj

Daijr, Koj

After 2 months I'm closing this.

Reopen.

I'll approve this to enable an xref, then reopen.

See 2540600. It was proposed that the entry (と見られる) be modified to remove the と, and establish glosses for 見られる itself. I proposed this creation as an alternative. The discussion is preserved in the 2540600 entry.

Daijr, GG5, etc. N-grams:
よみあげ	3023
読み上げ	1960368
読上げ	14688

GG5. N-grams: 1858119

It's there in its own entry. As I said, Tokyo's wards are municipalities in their own right.

It may be a bit redundant, but I was hoping we could keep it as a way to distinguish it from the definition of 市町村. After all, this word explicitly spells out Tokyo wards as part of its meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wards_of_Japan

It breaks our merging rules as the kanji and reading forms are distinct, so I'll make a separate entry for it. Tokyo's wards don't need spelling out as they are municipalities.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>区市町村</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くしちょうそん</reb>
-<re_restr>区市町村</re_restr>
@@ -20 +13 @@
-<gloss>municipalities (including Tokyo wards)</gloss>
+<gloss>municipalities</gloss>

daijisen https://kotobank.jp/word/区市町村-1996263#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89

Not sure if we can clump them together in one entry, but it's just a variation of the same thing so I thought it'd be okay.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>区市町村</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くしちょうそん</reb>
+<re_restr>区市町村</re_restr>
@@ -13 +20 @@
-<gloss>municipalities</gloss>
+<gloss>municipalities (including Tokyo wards)</gloss>

2nd sense from 1534740

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>gardener</gloss>
+</sense>

resurrecting.  see comments on 木造

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Withdrawing this and proposing a merge.

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス. N-grams 43381

Possible merge with 1534740.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>traffic analysis (esp. WWW)</gloss>
+<gloss>traffic analysis (esp. web)</gloss>

Daijr, 英和コンピューター用語辞典. N-grams:  1781978

daij

I think they're best kept separate. This appears to be archaic.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>lady attendant</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr, Koj

Could be merged with 1486490.

GG5, 医学英和辞典, Eijiro, Kagaku, Igaku

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>chemical formula</gloss>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>rational formula</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/示性式-73527

Daijs.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>Petty officer first class (US Navy)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1354060">上等兵曹・じょうとうへいそう</xref>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<gloss>chief petty officer (IJN)</gloss>
+<gloss>petty officer first class (US Navy)</gloss>

Wikipedia

リーダーズ+プラス

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Petty officer second class (US Navy)</gloss>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<gloss>petty officer (IJN, RN)</gloss>
+<gloss>petty officer second class (USN)</gloss>

Wikipedia

リーダーズ+プラス (calls it 2nd class)

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Petty officer third class (US Navy)</gloss>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<gloss>petty officer third class (USN)</gloss>

Wikipedia

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/学校_(曖昧さ回避)

just to make sure, nothing relevant on the wiki disambiguation page

Odd.

?

Merged with jmnedict Seq 5497669

The entry came from a list of male names.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<misc>&male;</misc>
-<gloss>Osaragi Jirou</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="5497669">大仏次郎</xref>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Osaragi Jirou (1897.10.9-1973.4.30)</gloss>

His pen name is Osaragi Jirou. You have it all as one word, which is weird.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Osaragijirou</gloss>
+<gloss>Osaragi Jirou</gloss>