ペラペラ	380935
ぺらぺら	143059

gg5, prog, daij
G n-grams:
ペラペラの紙	2625
ペラペラな紙	324
ペラペラした紙	97

Fixed PoS tags.
Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12,23 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>fluently (speaking a foreign language)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>incessantly (speaking)</gloss>
+<gloss>glibly</gloss>
+<gloss>garrulously</gloss>
+<gloss>volubly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>one after the other (flipping through pages)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14 +36,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,16 +39,3 @@
-<gloss>fluent</gloss>
-<gloss>fluency</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>flipping (pages)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>thin or weak (paper, cloth)</gloss>
+<gloss>thin (paper, cloth, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>flimsy</gloss>
+<gloss>weak</gloss>

hits

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペラペラ</reb>
+</r_ele>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>mass (media, production, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>マス</stagr>

I'm a bit uncomfortable about the "X" tag anyway, and I don't think it's appropriate here. Is there (still) an software that suppresses "X" entries.

personally, i don't think "masturbation", which is a perfectly inoffensive word (and the ~~preferred~~ term for the action), should qualify for an "X".  if "X" is to mean anything (and I'm not sure what really does keep it apart from "vulg"), I think it should be limited to terms for which the english glosses belong to a well-known list of bad words (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_dirty_words#The_words) rather than concepts that may make some people feel uncomfortable (e.g., someone else may complain that a certain sense of ホモ is not suitable for educational software.

@@ -22,1 +22,0 @@
-<misc>&X;</misc>

マス is a really common part of many words, and I don't think it's necessarily helpful to have this definition showing up all the time in educational software.

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<misc>&X;</misc>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1127910">マスコミュニケーション</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>the media</gloss>
+<gloss>mass media</gloss>

Odd. Added some time between 2007 and 2010.

@@ -15,4 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>mass collaboration, e.g. Wikipedia</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5, prog

Is there a source for sense 2?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the media</gloss>
+<gloss>mass media</gloss>

"家庭内暴力は、家庭内で起きる暴力のことで、一般的に子どもが親
に対して暴力をふるうことを指します。 また、同様に家庭内で起き
る暴力であっても、親が子どもに暴力をふるう場合を“児童虐待”、夫
が妻に暴力をふるうものを“ＤＶ”（ドメスティックバイオレンス）と
呼ぶことが通例となっています。"
https://h-navi.jp/column/article/35026150
(this is the no 1 result on Google for me)

I think it can stand. It's definitely not used exclusively 
for it, but "esp." seems OK to me (based on a Google 
search).

I'm still a bit uncomfortable with that "esp. adolescent children".

Daijr, GG5, etc. etc.

I'm not sure that Yuno Hanlon's statement is strictly true. All the JEs just say "domestic violence", etc. without qualification. Daijirin mentions the violence of children.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>household violence (adolescent children towards parents, not husband-wife violence)</gloss>
+<gloss>household violence (esp. adolescent children towards parents)</gloss>

http://www.jekai.org/entries/aa/00/np/aa00np55.htm

Specifically children vs. parents – between spouses is instead ＤＶ/ドメスティックバイオレンス (or in kango: 夫婦間暴力).
(This has also been stated by several teachers.)

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>household violence</gloss>
+<gloss>household violence (adolescent children towards parents, not husband-wife violence)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -25,2 +25,6 @@
-<gloss>to put close</gloss>
-<gloss>to let come near</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring close</gloss>
+<gloss>to let go near</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +32,2 @@
+<gloss>to bring (people) together</gloss>
+<gloss>to let come near (of a person)</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

jwiki(肩こり)
G n-grams:
 肩こり	2143348
 肩凝り	 186057

most refs have "stiff shoulders" bit I think that is too literal

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>肩こり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,3 +10,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>肩こり</keb>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>stiff neck</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>river management</gloss>
+<gloss>river improvement</gloss>

梯形	1199
台形	126033

Yes, there should be a way of saying that it's and old term and there are better ones. I'll see how this note goes.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>now usu. 台形</s_inf>

daijs: "台形の旧称"

Would it be helpful to have a note in cases like this? I don't think  [obs] is appropriate.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1412590">台形</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>trapezium</gloss>

Thanks.

gg5, prog, daij

Added a sense (new sense 2).
Moved [arch] sense to the end and reordered a couple others.
Only affects 3 sentences - the rest are for sense 1.

@@ -26,0 +27,8 @@
+<gloss>to trample on</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to set foot on (e.g. foreign soil)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand on</gloss>
+<gloss>to visit</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +45,7 @@
+<gloss>to follow (rules, principles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go through (e.g. formalities)</gloss>
+<gloss>to complete</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -37,0 +53,2 @@
+<gloss>to guess</gloss>
+<gloss>to judge</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +61 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1859800">韻を踏む</xref>
@@ -49,7 +67 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>to inherit (the throne, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5m;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to follow (rules, morals, principles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to succeed to (e.g. the throne)</gloss>

koj daijs

reordering readings

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ないぶんぴせん</reb>
+<reb>ないぶんぴつせん</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ないぶんぴつせん</reb>
+<reb>ないぶんぴせん</reb>

koj daijs

reordering readings

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ぶんぴぶつ</reb>
+<reb>ぶんぴつぶつ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ぶんぴつぶつ</reb>
+<reb>ぶんぴぶつ</reb>

As long as かたこと and へんげん have different definitions/glosses, I don't think we should be linking them.
ぺらぺら x-ref isn't necessary either.

@@ -21,3 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1626540">片言・へんげん・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1011580">ぺらぺら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1011580">ぺらぺら・1</xref>

eij

often written in katakana

@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カタコト</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

It's not an "ant".

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1011580">ぺらぺら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011580">ぺらぺら・1</xref>

Ok. Let's drop it.

None of the EJs I looked at use it for "behind closed doors". The had things like ひそかに and 内密に.
Suggest removing..

Not sure if this is worth keeping.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>"behind closed doors"</gloss>
+<gloss>behind closed doors</gloss>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
律義	16275
律義に	6229
律義な	3802
律義を	36
律義が	No matches
律義さ	661

Adjective glosses are better here.

@@ -20,4 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>honesty</gloss>
-<gloss>faithfulness</gloss>
-<gloss>conscientiousness</gloss>
-<gloss>integrity</gloss>
+<gloss>upright</gloss>
+<gloss>honest</gloss>
+<gloss>faithful</gloss>
+<gloss>conscientious</gloss>
+<gloss>sincere</gloss>

koj daijs
G n-grams:
 律儀	197750
 律義	 16275

reordering kanji forms

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>律儀</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,3 +10,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>律儀</keb>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>used as a symbol for Buddhist temples on maps</s_inf>
+<s_inf>卍 is used as a symbol for Buddhist temples on maps</s_inf>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Tidying

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>swastika (esp. a counterclockwise swastika as a Buddhist symbol)</gloss>
+<gloss>swastika (esp. counterclockwise form as a Buddhist symbol)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<field>&biol;</field>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>
@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<field>&biol;</field>

koj daijs

reordering readings

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<reb>ないぶんぴつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -15,3 +17,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ないぶんぴつ</reb>

GG5

fld

@@ -22,0 +22,2 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&biol;</field>
@@ -26,0 +28,2 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&biol;</field>

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

[vt,vi]: shinmeikai, oukoku, iwakoku, sankoku
[vt]:    meikyo

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, gg5

Splitting

@@ -15,2 +15,9 @@
-<gloss>to bring close to</gloss>
-<gloss>to associate with</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring close</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring near</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to associate with (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep company with</gloss>
+<gloss>to let come close</gloss>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1511640">片言・かたこと</xref>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +12,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1511640">片言・かたこと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1511640">片言・かたこと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1511640">片言・かたこと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1511640">片言・かたこと</xref>
@@ -15,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one side (e.g. of an argument)</gloss>
+<gloss>ex-parte statement</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>usu. with vol. verb or adj. stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. with volitional verb or adj. stem</s_inf>

I think "also as" is a good translation for certain cases e.g.
daijs:
"エステティック
《「エステティク」「エステティーク」とも》"

Could this note be clarified? "usu. with vol. verb or adj. stem" 
I think "vol. verb" is a little cryptic. Volume verb? Voluminous verb? Verb describing volume?

And the note [note="sometimes esp. an emphatic form of the particle と"] as well - isn't "sometimes esp." a little clumsy?

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>also as</gloss>

If there has to be a (real) gloss...

@@ -42 +42 @@
-<gloss>emphatic particle</gloss>
+<gloss>well</gloss>

No longer working.

@@ -41,4 +40,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・4</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1230490">旧株</xref>

gg5, daijr

Doesn't refer to the issuing itself.

@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>newly issued stock or share</gloss>
-<gloss>stock issue</gloss>
-<gloss>share issue</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>new stock</gloss>
+<gloss>new share</gloss>
+<gloss>newly issued shares</gloss>

gg5 eij

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>new stocks or shares</gloss>
+<gloss>newly issued stock or share</gloss>
+<gloss>stock issue</gloss>
+<gloss>share issue</gloss>

gg5, daij

More accurate

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>babbling</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>mixture of correct and broken speech</gloss>

gg5
daijs: "「つづけさま」とも"
G n-grams:
続け様	        5663
続けざま	        53428
続けさま	        3159
続けざまに	48214
続けざまな	91
続けざまの	1985

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>続けざま</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>続けざま</keb>
+<keb>続けさま</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>続けざま</re_restr>
+<re_restr>続け様</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つづけさま</reb>
+<re_restr>続け様</re_restr>
+<re_restr>続けさま</re_restr>
@@ -13,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +27,4 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 続けざまに</s_inf>
+<gloss>successive</gloss>
+<gloss>consecutive</gloss>
+<gloss>back-to-back</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>utilization of water</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>navigability (e.g. of a river)</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>information center</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>information center</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Appears in names of many bodies (we have several XX相談所 entries). Seems to be read both ways.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そうだんしょ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>information center</gloss>
+<gloss>agency</gloss>

ノリが良い	20866
のりが良い	3324
乗りが良い	2632
乗りがよい	463
乗りがいい	3913
ノリがいい	50902
のりがいい	7005
ノリがよい	3111
のりがよい	1409

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りがいい</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19,10 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノリがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>ノリが良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>のりがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>乗りがいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>のりが良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りが良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -28 +41 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -38 +51 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Aligning with the edited ノリがいい entry. I'm leaving the "uk" from there too pro tem. We need to address ~いい/~よい situation.

@@ -29,2 +29,6 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・2</xref>
-<gloss>spreading well</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>good at playing along</gloss>
+<gloss>up for anything</gloss>
+<gloss>carefree</gloss>
+<gloss>social</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -35,6 +39,3 @@
-<gloss>easily be influenced into joining some mood</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<gloss>easy to get into</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>uplifting</gloss>
+<gloss>upbeat</gloss>

N-grams

Adding POS and splitting. There are hits for 乗りがよかった, so it better have a POS.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ノリが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のりが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,4 +14 @@
-<keb>乗りがいい</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ノリが良い</keb>
+<keb>乗りがよい</keb>
@@ -14,3 +17,2 @@
-<reb>のりがいい</reb>
-<re_restr>乗りが良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>乗りがいい</re_restr>
+<reb>ノリがよい</reb>
+<re_restr>ノリが良い</re_restr>
@@ -19,2 +21,4 @@
-<reb>ノリがいい</reb>
-<re_restr>ノリが良い</re_restr>
+<reb>のりがよい</reb>
+<re_restr>のりが良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りが良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りがよい</re_restr>
@@ -24 +28,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・2</xref>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・2</xref>
@@ -28,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +39 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

Don't know it - I think Paul Blay added it in mid-2006.
I'd quite forgotten the ノリ in that entry. Paul also commented on the 乗り entry that it was often ノリ.

I think this is a fork. I'll reject it and add it again.

I don't see how the [expl] glosses would be different from 
the notes, though...? I mean, if they are notes on usage, 
they should be in the notes. I've said it before on the 
mailing list though; I think we should let through senses 
which have notes but no gloss into the database.

I think [expl] glosses work much better here. The current glosses are confusing, in my opinion.

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
@@ -33,2 +32 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>

Senses 4 and 5.

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
-<xref type="see">なあ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
@@ -33,2 +33,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
-<xref type="see">なあ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ・1</xref>

What's happened to the former sense 1? It has an example sentence and there's an xref pointing to it.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
+<xref type="see">なあ</xref>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
+<xref type="see">なあ</xref>

Fork. Must be rejected.

I'm ok with Marcus's suggestion

I don't think it should be tagged as abbr (and I don't think the xref to なさい is helpful).
daijr for example says 〔補助動詞「なさる」の命令の言い方「なさい」を省略したものから
なさい is the etymology, it's not right to say it's an actual abbreviation of it today.

Until 2018 there was a "from なさい" note,

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/2707/using-な-in-positive-instead-of-negative-imperative-e-g-行きな

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2192950">なさい</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

From deleted entry.

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<s_inf>used to get someone's attention or press one's point</s_inf>
@@ -35 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>you</gloss>
+<gloss>look</gloss>
+<gloss>say</gloss>

aligning w other senses
(but not sure which is best)

@@ -53 +53 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end; used as a request for confirmation or agreement</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used as a request for confirmation or agreement; used at sentence end</s_inf>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/663842052fda2bba03b7dc8a247d5afad9653f97
"真面目だったなぁ。"

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なぁ</reb>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/44f25ca79e3a0c1195675b0c24c26bbb943f4fc1
なんかあっという間に終わったなあっていう、何も感じなかったっていうのが正直な感想。

suggest merging in なあ as it can be used for 3 out of 5 senses here.

adding one ksb sense also (though there's more), copied it from ね

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なあ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +17 @@
+<stagr>な</stagr>
@@ -13,0 +23 @@
+<stagr>な</stagr>
@@ -20,2 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2100620">なあ</xref>
@@ -38,0 +47,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; used as a request for confirmation or agreement</s_inf>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
+<gloss>right?</gloss>
+<gloss>isn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>doesn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you think?</gloss>

meikyo (sense 2): "《下に「よい」「構わない」など許容の意を表す語を伴い》個数・年齢の大小にこだわらないで、許容できる意を表す。いくつ…てもよい。文脈的には「多くても少なくてもよい」「多く（または、少なく）てもよい」の意となる。「出品数に特別の規定はない。─よい」「─いいから買って下さい」"

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>any number of</gloss>
+<gloss>great many</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>preceding よい, 構わない, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>any number</gloss>
+<gloss>as few or as many (as you like)</gloss>
+<gloss>whether large or small</gloss>
+</sense>

meikyo

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Entry created

https://www.quora.com/In-linguistics-what-is-the-difference-between-pidgin-and-Creole
N-grams:
ちゃんぽん語	63
チャンポン語	199

Technically it's not pidgin.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>チャンポン語</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>チャンポンご</reb>
+<re_restr>チャンポン語</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>ちゃんぽん語</re_restr>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1984610">ちゃんぽん・1</xref>
@@ -13 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>pidgin</gloss>

Google examples

Examples:
"麻雀用語は日本語と中国語のちゃんぽん語"
"日本語と英語が混ざった「ちゃんぽん語」"
"日本語を勉強し始めたアメリカ人の夫 が生み出す日米ちゃんぽん語"
"ベトナムで変 にベトナム語と英語のちゃんぽん語を話している"
"中日英ちゃんぽん語"

The meaninig is pretty clear if you look up ちゃんぽん

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>words from another language</gloss>
+<gloss>speech mixing words from two languages</gloss>
+<gloss>pidgin</gloss>

Entry created

eij gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>period of low stock prices</gloss>
+<gloss>(period of) low stock prices</gloss>
+<gloss>falling stock prices</gloss>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a period of high stock prices</gloss>
-<gloss>a market of high stock prices</gloss>
+<gloss>(period of) high stock prices</gloss>
+<gloss>rising stock prices</gloss>

Entry created

koj daijs

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しんけいないぶんぴつ</reb>
+</r_ele>

gg5 says 'neuroendocrine system' but i think that's clearly better as 神経内分泌系.  koj defines 神経内分泌 as a 現象.

daijs

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しんけいないぶんぴつけい</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijs, eij

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

OK. I'll align ノリがよい with this too.
Yes, need to sort out the ~いい/~よい situation.

実用日本語表現辞典
_
"あなたが思うJ-POPのノリのいい曲を教えて！"
"ヒットした、ORANGE RANGEの｢上海ハニー｣はテンションがあがりま
す。"
"Superfly のタマシイレボリューションは唄がアツイからあがるよね
ぇ"
http://music-
book.jp/music/voteranking/jpop/%E3%81%82%E3%81%AA%E3%81%9F%
E3%81%8C%E6%80%9D%E3%81%86J-
POP%E3%81%AE%E3%83%8E%E3%83%AA%E3%81%AE%E3%81%84%E3%81%84%E
6%9B%B2%E3%82%92%E6%95%99%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6%EF%BC%81

This entry =＋it's ~がよい and ~のよい versions are all 
quite a mess. 
_
Jitsuyo only lists one sense. I'm not sure what "spreading 
well" (prev sense 1) is supposed to mean, so I removed it. 
I think sense 3, "easy to get into" is wrong - the usage in 
ノリのいい曲 (see the music-book ref above) seems to mean 
"upbeat" or "happy" or "uplifting". I'm not sure it needs 
to be a separate sense (but I've kept it as such).
_

The headword in jitsuyo is "ノリが良い" but they only offer 
the reading いい, not よい. Daij also list 良い as a kanji 
for いい. Ultimately I think we should merge this and all 
the other ～いい/～よい splits back (I've taken up this on 
the mailing list) but either way, I think 良い should be 
included here.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ノリが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノリがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>ノリが良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,4 +19,2 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ノリがいい</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_restr>乗りがいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りが良い</re_restr>
@@ -17 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・2</xref>
@@ -19,8 +26,5 @@
-<gloss>spreading well</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・4</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>easily be influenced into joining some mood</gloss>
+<gloss>good at playing along</gloss>
+<gloss>up for anything</gloss>
+<gloss>carefree</gloss>
+<gloss>social</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -32 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>easy to get into</gloss>
+<gloss>uplifting</gloss>
+<gloss>upbeat</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・4</xref>

N-grams:
乗りがいい	3913
のりがいい	7005
ノリがいい	50902

Splitting from 1901140.

OK.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<s_inf>euphemism</s_inf>

8 hits on google books, among them:
女性のデータブック: 性・からだから政治参加まで (1999)
"密室の暴力"
"密室の暴力親密な関係における男性から女性への暴力(強制力)をド
メスティック,バイオレンスという。"
6 hits on twitter since Jan 1

I think it's helpful. Certainly not immediately 
understandable from its constituent parts. Not sure I agree 
it's euphemistic though? Is "violence behind closed doors" 
a euphemism? You're not masking the "violence" part, so I 
think not. Also not sure it's really uncommon enough to tag 
as [obsc].

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>violence behind closed doors</gloss>

Isn't the use of 密室 being euphemistic? I suggest keeping it with some tags.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1987460">ドメスティックバイオレンス</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1192340">家庭内暴力・かていないぼうりょく</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<s_inf>euphemism</s_inf>

G n-grams: 54
6 pages of Google results

I don't think this is worth keeping.
It's A+B and not the common term for domestic violence.

I see passages that use it also refer to "DV".

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

thanks

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>しょうわてんおう</reb>
+<reb>しょうわてんのう</reb>

wiki

deserves to be both in the name dict and here

daijr

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Ok. Didn't check those refs.

ルミナス: 情報局 intelligence bureau
中辞典: 中央情報局 〈米国の〉 the Central Intelligence Agency 《略: CIA》
http://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/2508533?pid=3234228 : "英国情報局"..

Daijr & GG5 do that, but the other JEs are more general. I suspect it's also now a generic term.

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<gloss>intelligence agency</gloss>
+<gloss>intelligence bureau</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/情報局

The refs direct to this.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>intelligence agency</gloss>
-<gloss>intelligence bureau</gloss>
-<gloss>information board</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2626420">内閣情報局</xref>
+<gloss>Cabinet Intelligence Bureau (1940-1945)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc. N-grams: 1580194

daijs
G n-grams: 183371

gg5
G n-grams: 20230

daijr

@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2047250">諸子百家・しょしひゃっか</xref>
-<gloss>School of Diplomacy</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">one of the Schools of Thought during the Warring States period in China</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2047250">諸子百家</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>School of Diplomacy (school of thought during the Warring States period in China)</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk

I think it's worth having.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しょうおうか</reb>
+</r_ele>

Koj

Here? Enamdict? Drop it?

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>school of diplomacy</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2047250">諸子百家・しょしひゃっか</xref>
+<gloss>School of Diplomacy</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">one of the Schools of Thought during the Warring States period in China</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/縦横家

GG5, Unidic. N-grams:
塊肉	9950
固まり肉	2873

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>固まり肉</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>chunks of meat for grilling</gloss>
+<gloss>chunk of meat (e.g. for grilling)</gloss>
+<gloss>joint of meat</gloss>

https://weekly.ascii.jp/elem/000/000/309/309998/

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>nutmeg (soccer)</gloss>
+<gloss>nutmeg (in soccer)</gloss>

股抜き	9,001	66.7%	
股ぬき	169	1.3%	
また抜き	4,316	32.0%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>また抜き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

This is regularly used in sports news articles. At most it's colloquial.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

I've been aware of the colour scheme since my first visit to Japan in 1981. My point is that JR's decision to put the livery colour into the name of the place doesn't really relate to the English meaning. I don't mind adding literal translations of quirky terms, but one shouldn't go too far. I wouldn't add "[lit] little red" to 赤ちゃん, for example.

Well, looking at Google Images, there is always a prominent green element in the signage for these. Knowing that it's literally "green" would help users of the dictionary make the connection.

GG5: 〔JR の〕 a “Green Window”; a JR counter for the sale of long-distance and express train tickets.

Not too sure the literal version helps.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">green ticket window</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2446480">ＪＲ</xref>