I think this is obvious enough.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>(spaghetti alla) carbonara (type of pasta)</gloss>
+<gloss>(spaghetti alla) carbonara</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>canvas (boxing, wrestling)</gloss>
+<gloss>canvas (in boxing or wrestling)</gloss>

Splitting on source word.

@@ -13,6 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>matte (finish, colour, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>matt</gloss>
-<gloss>mat</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -21,4 +14,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>matte (metallurgy)</gloss>

daij, gg5

Added sense.
I think this ordering is better.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>matte (metallurgical)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>matte (finish, colour, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>matt</gloss>
+<gloss>mat</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -19,3 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>matte</gloss>
-<gloss>matt</gloss>
-<gloss>mat (finish, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>canvas (boxing, wrestling)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>matte (metallurgy)</gloss>

neither sense deserves a prio tag

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

I agree, I can't find ray/lay usages, apart from layoff, layover, etc,

not in gg5 koj daijs

removing the senses "ray" and "lay"
they are in Readers+, but that is an EJ with katakana forms of all keywords, and hence not a reliable ref

@@ -15,8 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>ray</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>lay</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Trimming

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<gloss>lei</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Polynesian garland of flowers, often worn around the neck</gloss>
+<gloss>lei (garland of flowers)</gloss>

Almost Wasei.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>VIP enclosure</gloss>

http://akita.japanbasketball.jp/akita-w/custom3.html

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>box seating</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロイヤル・ボックス</reb>

daij, koj

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>province far from the capital</gloss>
+</sense>

ritsuryo conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>province of the lowest rank (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>province of the lowest rank (ritsuryō system)</gloss>

daij

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>leaving for the provinces</gloss>
+<gloss>province of the lowest rank (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>province of the lowest rank (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>leaving for the provinces</gloss>

daij, koj

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>province of the lowest rank (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+</sense>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>holding a meeting</gloss>
-<gloss>opening an exhibition</gloss>
+<gloss>holding (a conference, exhibition, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>opening</gloss>

gg5

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>open an exhibition</gloss>
+<gloss>opening an exhibition</gloss>
+<gloss>hosting (e.g. the Olympics)</gloss>

GG5

Possibly too many of these ~中 entries, but this one is in GG5 and may as well stay.

gg5

Not sure we need this.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>in progress</gloss>
+<gloss>under way</gloss>
+<gloss>open</gloss>

iwakoku: 中国の兵法の書「六韜」の、虎韜の巻から出た語。

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

May as well de-clutter this a little.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

With 5k in the ngrams I'd keep it.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とらの巻</keb>

とらの巻 = around 2% of hits, I don't think it's needed.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>とらの巻</keb>

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>affirmative (logic)</gloss>
+<field>&logic;</field>
+<gloss>affirmative</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, gg5

Added sense.
Dropped adjective gloss.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>positive</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1482990">否定・1</xref>
@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>affirmative (logic)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

gg5 (大虎小虎 - no reading)
reading →
http://kanji.reader.bz/小虎
https://furigana.info/w/小虎

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>こどら</reb>
+<reb>ことら</reb>
@@ -13 +13,7 @@
-<gloss>drinker</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1413630">大虎・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1413630">大虎・2</xref>
+<gloss>light drinker</gloss>
+<gloss>occasional drinker</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom, daij

I don't think the examples are needed.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>extermination (e.g. of pests, demons, bandits)</gloss>
+<gloss>extermination</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +29,5 @@
+<gloss>subjugation</gloss>
+<gloss>getting rid of</gloss>
+<gloss>stamping out</gloss>
+<gloss>wiping out</gloss>
+<gloss>rooting out</gloss>
@@ -35 +40 @@
-<gloss>making someone renounce worldly desires in order to concentrate on Buddha's teachings</gloss>
+<gloss>renouncing worldly desires (in order to concentrate on Buddhist teachings)</gloss>
@@ -41 +46 @@
-<gloss>curing illness</gloss>
+<gloss>curing (an illness)</gloss>

[vt]: meikyo, smk, sankoku, iwakoku, etc.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 退治　 │ 1,091,887 │ 99.9% │
│ 対治　 │     1,136 │  0.1% │ - rK (daijr)
│ たいじ │   136,926 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Thanks for drawing this to my attention - it's a WWWJDIC matter.
It seems that a utility program that massages the dictionary to assist with glossing was acting strangely. I recompiled it and it's OK now - I think there was possibly a mismatch between the program and a support library. It was last compiled in 2014.

Hi, I'm here to report a bug.
If you paste 退治する or 退治して (but not 退治 alone) into text-glossing, you get this weird response:

退治する from : 退治(P); 対治 【たいじ】 (n,vs) (1) extermination (e.g. of pests, demons, bandits); eliminatradication; destruction; supp; suppression; (2)

What is eliminatradication? What is supp?

gg5

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>destruction</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

gg5, daijs

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>おおどら</reb>
+<reb>おおとら</reb>

Just wanted to note that Meikyo also has a specific sense for "no thanks":
❸ 〔俗〕相手の勧誘などを遠回しに拒否する語。結構。

Understood. I use it that way too. I've identified a suitable example.

"When a waiter asks them “do you want some water?”, 
people say “daijobu desu” to mean “no thanks” or 
literally “I’m fine”. But if they ask “Could I pour some 
more water into your glass?” and people say “daijobu 
desu”, it can be easy to become confused as to what this 
“daijobu” indicates."
http://jpninfo.com/3702

Daijs 2 senses:
１ あぶなげがなく安心できるさま。強くてしっかりしているさま。
「地震にも大丈夫なようにできている」「食べても大丈夫ですか」
「病人はもう大丈夫だ」
２ まちがいがなくて確かなさま。「時間は大丈夫ですか」「大丈夫
だ、今度はうまくいくよ」
(gg5 is pretty much the same)

The thing is that to use "大丈夫" to decline an 
invitation etc. is considered incorrect/slang, so I 
don't think it should be tweaked into sense 1. The 
"alright/OK" in sense 1 is different from the 
"alright/OK" in sense 3. Sense 1: （具合の悪そうな人に）
「大丈夫ですか？」「ええ、大丈夫です」(from gg5)
It's an "OK/alright" as in, "not dying/safe/free from 
worry"
Sense 3: (from the Asahi article)
「“今晩、一杯飲みに行くか？”って誘ったら“大丈夫です”って言われ
たって言うんだ。“大丈夫”なら来られるはずだろう。いったい何が大
丈夫なんだ？」
_
Tried adjusting sense 1 a little to make it more obvious 
that it doesn't mean "OK/sure!" as in "sure, let's do 
it"

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<gloss>secure</gloss>
+<gloss>sound</gloss>
+<gloss>problem-free</gloss>
+<gloss>without fear</gloss>
@@ -26 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>sure</gloss>

I'm possibly missing something, but I really can't see the case for this third sense. I can't think of examples where it differs noticeably from sense 1. I checked the 78 Tanaka sentence for 大丈夫 (http://www.edrdg.org/cgi-bin/wwwjdic/wwwjdic?1Q�����_0__) and I can't see any there that would fit. GG5 only has the two - surely a little tweaking for sense 1 would do?

I was about to suggest the same thing. I'll do it.

@@ -10,9 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>斃れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>仆れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>殪れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -35 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -45 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -59 +46,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -68 +54,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -75 +60,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

I think the usual thing to do in this situation is to create a new 斃れる/仆れる/殪れる entry and have an x-ref pointing to this entry's "die" sense.

daij

斃れる, 仆れる and 殪れる all only apply to the "to die" 
sense, one out of seven senses. If they would still 
appear in searches, it'd make sense to just include them 
in a note...
_
Also a reminder that the example sentences will have to 
be adjusted if my split of sense 1 goes through.

@@ -44,0 +45 @@
+<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

gg5 and prog examples

Nobody (at least not daij/kenkyusha) splits like this, 
but 英英 dictionaries usually split "collapse" into two 
senses, e.g. Merriam Webster: https://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/collapse
oxford university press
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/collapse

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>to take a fall</gloss>
@@ -32 +33,10 @@
-<gloss>to tumble</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be destroyed (in a collapse)</gloss>
+<gloss>to collapse</gloss>
+<gloss>to cave in</gloss>
+<gloss>to crumble</gloss>
+<gloss>to give away</gloss>

daijs

内	85171683	100.0%
內	2822	0.0%

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>內</keb>

I guess it's OK to leave the "also 裡, 裏..", etc. notes.

@@ -11,0 +12,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>裡</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>裏</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>家</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijs, koj

Not [vs].

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>補闕</keb>
@@ -18 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, prog

I don't think those glosses add anything.

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>exemplification</gloss>
-<gloss>exemplum</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>pattern</gloss>

daijr

I think a good translation might be "good-for-nothing son" 
but it shouldn't be taken literally, of course...

@@ -13,6 +13 @@
-<gloss>son</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<gloss>stupid son</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) son</gloss>

No response. I'll reject it.

References?

@@ -9,0 +10,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みくに</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すめぐに</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すめらみくに</reb>
+</r_ele>

daij, gg5

Splitting.

@@ -12,0 +13,5 @@
+<gloss>fortress</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>key position</gloss>

http://business-japan.jp/2011/10/31/whats-the-difference-
between-blue-and-white-tax-return-filing/

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834866">白色申告</xref>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of income tax return filing which allows for special income deductions</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>blue (tax) return</gloss>
+<gloss>blue return</gloss>
+<gloss>blue-paper income-tax return</gloss>

This original gloss should possibly be reinstated as a basic meaning, followed by a more meaningful explanation.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>mock Buddhist sutra</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>

As per discussion.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>type of fast-paced humorous singing mimicking the chanting of a Buddhist sutra, usually with lyrics satirizing current events</gloss>
+<gloss>ahodarakyō</gloss>

I'm of the opinion that Japanese glosses are 
fine/helpful even if they aren't very common in English 
- at least when there's no other widespread English 
term. 
There might be several words in Japanese with a 
particular meaning, but English-language academia etc. 
will probably have settled on using just one of them 
specifically. For example, you will probably not find あ
ほだら経 called "ahodara" in English language literature, 
though that'd be fine in Japanese (at least according to 
daij). If a translator (or other user) comes across a 
text where the word ”あほどら" is used to mean "あほだら
経", I think it's to provide a good service to let them 
know that they'd be better off translating it as 
"ahodorakyo" than "ahodora". We can lead people the 
right way through x-refs as well, but they're not as 
visible and are easy to miss.

GG5

As I commented on "I think "ahodarakyō" is not an appropriate *English* gloss for this sense. For a transliteration of the Japanese to be a suitable gloss I think it has to fairly easily recognized in English, and this one isn't."

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>ahodarakyō</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

ritsuryo conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>provinces close to Kyoto (under ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>provinces close to Kyoto (under ritsuryō system)</gloss>

daij

I think this is clearer.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>lands outlying Kyoto</gloss>
+<gloss>provinces close to Kyoto (under ritsuryo system)</gloss>

prog

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13,2 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>snake in one's bosom</gloss>

Better to keep it visible if it's in daijirin

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<keb>シシ唐辛子</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>獅子唐芥子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<keb>獅子唐芥子</keb>
+<keb>シシ唐辛子</keb>

G n-grams:

しし唐辛子　　 3,477 35.8% <- adding
獅子唐辛子　　 1,119 11.5%
シシ唐辛子　　   104  1.1% <- adding [sK]
ししとう辛子　     0  0.0%
シシトウ辛子　     0  0.0%
しし唐芥子　　     0  0.0%
シシ唐芥子　　     0  0.0%
獅子唐芥子　　     0  0.0% <- daijr; adding [sK]
しし蕃椒　　　     0  0.0%
シシ蕃椒　　　     0  0.0%
獅子蕃椒　　　     0  0.0%
獅子唐がらし　     0  0.0%
獅子唐ガラシ　     0  0.0%
ししとうがらし 4,023 41.4%
シシトウガラシ   983 10.1% <- jawiki; adding

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>しし唐辛子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>シシ唐辛子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>獅子唐芥子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +20,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シシトウガラシ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

prog

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>shishito</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to engrave in one's liver</gloss>

肝に銘じる	15392
肝に命じる	1999

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>肝に命じる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">the harshest of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>
+<gloss>the harshest of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryō system</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834889">三流・さんる</xref>

Don't need to say banishment twice.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">the harshest banishment of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">the harshest of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>

If [expl] isn't implemented/exported yet, the [expl] sense 
isn't a great gloss as it's not really an explanatory 
gloss, just an explanation.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">harshest of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">the harshest banishment of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>

gg5 daij "自分の力ではどうにもならない。" "自分の力では扱いきれ
ない。"

doesn't necessarily mean "totally uncontrollable", the 
nuance is that the speaker can't do it (on their own)

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>spoiled</gloss>
+<gloss>too much for one to handle</gloss>
+<gloss>beyond one's capacity</gloss>

G n-grams:
手に負えない	95449
手におえない	20053
てにおえない	461

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手におえない</keb>

wiki(Mahavairocana Tantra)
jwiki(大毘盧遮那成仏神変加持経)

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2096770">大毘盧遮那成仏神変加持経・だいびるしゃなきょうじょうぶつしんぺんかじきょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2096770">大毘盧遮那成仏神変加持経・だいびるしゃなきょうじょうぶつしんぺんかじきょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2096770">大毘盧遮那成仏神変加持経・だいびるしゃなじょうぶつじんべんかじきょう</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>Mahavairocana Tantra</gloss>

Entry created

mk

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij

Not just underwater diving. Could just have one "dive" sense. I'll leave it for someone else to decide.

@@ -9 +9,12 @@
-<gloss>underwater dive</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>dive (e.g. into water)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>(underwater) diving</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>dive (of an aircraft)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>(used as a replacement for "bosozoku", which has a 'cool' image) biker gang</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<gloss>biker gang</gloss>

Entry created

daijr
meikyo: 古い言い方

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -13,2 +14,6 @@
-<s_inf>usu. followed by a negative form</s_inf>
-<gloss>worth special consideration</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. sentence</s_inf>
+<gloss>(any) particular</gloss>
+<gloss>notable</gloss>
+<gloss>noteworthy</gloss>
+<gloss>significant</gloss>
+<gloss>considerable</gloss>

daijr:
然せる
（ 連体 ） （下に打ち消しの語を伴って）とりたてていうほどの。さ
ほどの。さしたる。 「 －こともなく終わる」 「 －御咎めもなく／怪
談牡丹灯籠 円朝」

what does "negative form" mean here? I think this 
definition is a little abstruse.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(usu. followed by a negative form) worth special consideration</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. followed by a negative form</s_inf>
+<gloss>worth special consideration</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2394750">立ちっぱ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2394750">立ちっぱ</xref>
-<gloss>stand on one's feet for a long time</gloss>
+<gloss>standing on one's feet for a long time</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>stand on one's feet for a long time</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>standing on one's feet for a long time</gloss>

Entry created

Both need the same tag.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Better?
Also not sure why Johan added 𠮟 back in 2019, but if it should stay, it should have an [ateji] tag...

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<s_inf>used to silence someone</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>shush!</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<s_inf>used to drive off an approaching animal, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -25,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>go away!</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>𠮟</keb>

Let's just remove this one, as it does't appear in other 
dictionaries and no evidence of its use was presented.

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>𠮟</keb>

Fork.

Should this be "usu. sentence end"? Shouldn't it be "after 
a masu-stem" or something?

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>abbr of ...ていたの</s_inf>
-<gloss>(usu. sentence end) indicates emotion, admiration, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. sentence end; abbr of ...ていたの</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates emotion, admiration, emphasis, etc.</gloss>

changing x-ref to the "real" entry for の

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2270030">の</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の・5</xref>

Entry created

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>abbr of ...ていたの</s_inf>
-<gloss>(usu. sentence end) indicates emotion, admiration, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr of ～ていたの; usu. at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates emotion, admiration, emphasis, etc.</gloss>

changing x-ref to the "real" entry for の

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2270030">の</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の・5</xref>

Entry created

[adv], not [adv-to].
I think this is [arch]. Not in meikyo or the JEs. Only archaic examples in the kokugos.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1163940">ちょっと・2</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

OK, you've convinced me, good finds. I'm OK with it being 
last.

http://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3005071
https://www.excite.co.jp/News/chn_soc/20161020/Recordchina_20161020020.html
http://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/2590827?pid=4012332
https://www.junglecity.com/news/shooting-at-marysville-pilchuck-high-school-washington/

1st article: 0 dead. 2 injured.
2nd article: 1 dead. 0 injured.
3rd article: 1 dead. 2 injured. 
4th article: 0 dead. 2 injures.
--
Even if 銃乱射 refers to a mass shooting 99 times out of 100, I don't think it's correct to say that they're equivalent. Very few people would describe the above incidents as mass shootings.

>Yes but 銃乱射 does not mean "mass shooting".
I think it does. It's all about how it's actually used, 
isn't it? For the first 40 search results on Google, all 
correspond to "mass shooting" much better than they do 
to "shooting spree." I haven't been able to find a 
single usage of the word where it doesn't refer to 
several people being shot (and killed).
_
There's also not anything in the word "mass shooting" 
that "implies many deaths." Wiki just defines it as 
"mass shooting is an incident involving multiple victims 
of firearms-related violence. The United States' 
Congressional Research Service acknowledges that there 
is not a broadly accepted definition, and defines a 
"public mass shooting"[2] as one in which four or more 
people selected indiscriminately, not including the 
perpetrator, are killed or injured".

Yes but 銃乱射 does not mean "mass shooting". 
It may be a useful gloss but it shouldn't go first.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>shooting spree</gloss>
+<gloss>shooting rampage</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>shooting rampage</gloss>
-<gloss>shooting spree</gloss>

Robin, what's reported as "mass shootings" in English 
language media are basically always reported as 銃乱射 in 
the Japanese media.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&geol;</field>

wiki

One xref is enough.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる</xref>
@@ -24,5 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
@@ -30,5 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
@@ -36,5 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・1</xref>

daijr koj

Saw 斃る on a poster (with furigana).
I’ve given a v. brief gloss, as it’s just an archaic version.

I’ve added the alt. kanji 仆る and 殪る (not in refs for たおる 
but in たおれる) as they do appear at the frequencies you’d 
expect (given frequencies for たおれる).

daijs (on yahoo dic)

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>𠮟𠮟</keb>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>shh! (used to silence someone)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to silence someone</s_inf>
+<gloss>shh!</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>shoo! (used to drive off animals, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to drive off animals, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>shoo!</gloss>

20+5 was for googits
I also get exactly 25 hits on Twitter (in total) i.e. since 
2011
https://twitter.com/search?
f=tweets&vertical=default&q=%E3%81%82%E3%81%BE%E3%81%A1%E3%
81%A1%E3%81%93%E3%81%84&src=typd

http://www.eonet.ne.jp/~h-sixty/hougena.html
heard used by a guy in his mid-30's from Wakayama.
Only 20+5 hits online

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

daijs

given as "grand inquisitor" in some places

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>charity (in Christian theology)</gloss>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<gloss>charity</gloss>

Let's go with that.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>charity (in faith, hope and charity)</gloss>
+<gloss>charity (in Christian theology)</gloss>

Charity is "a virtue", but it's a specific 
virtue, i.e. (well) charity, so  "virtue" 
isn't a great gloss.
Wouldn't "charity (in Christian theology)" or 
"(in Christianity)" be better/clearer than 
"charity (in faith, hope and charity)"?

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>virtue</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theological_virtues

Widespread in Christianity (1 Corinthians 13); not just in Catholicism.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>charity (in Catholicism)</gloss>
+<gloss>charity (in faith, hope and charity)</gloss>
+<gloss>virtue</gloss>

By (charity in Catholicism) I meant "one of Catholicism's 
three theological virtues: Faith, Hope and Charity". See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_(virtue)
It was a little ambiguous, though. Maybe this is better?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>charity</gloss>
+<gloss>charity (in Catholicism)</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>virtue (esp. in Catholicism)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&Christn;</field>
@@ -11 +12 @@
-<gloss>charity (in Christian theology)</gloss>
+<gloss>charity</gloss>

aligning with 愛徳

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>caritas (virtue in Catholicism)</gloss>
-<gloss>charity</gloss>
+<gloss>caritas</gloss>
+<gloss>charity (in Christian theology)</gloss>

daijr 世界大百科事典 第２版

I've heard it as "idiot economics" a few times, so I think it should be there somewhere, even if it's a bit literal.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>idiot economics</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
@@ -13,3 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>from あほ and -nomics</s_inf>
-<gloss>idiot economics</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">play on Abenomics</gloss>
+<s_inf>pun on あほ and アベノミクス</s_inf>
+<gloss>stupid Abenomics</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/アホノミクス

Thought I'd added this ages ago.

jwiki

Splitting from 1445790.

Splitting.

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">the least severe of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>
+<gloss>the least severe of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryō system</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834889">三流・さんる</xref>

daij, koj

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">middle-degree punishment of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryo system</gloss>
+<gloss>middle-degree punishment of the three banishment punishments under the ritsuryō system</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834889">三流・さんる</xref>

daij, koj

Not sure how to word this one.

chiezo

mentionwd in chiezo cold wallet entry

Sorry, didn't notice the "バイアスロン" part of your comment.

asahi keyword: バイアスロン
ラテン語で「2種目の競技」の意味。クロスカントリースキーで走ったあ
と、ライフル射撃に入る。個人種目は距離別に4種目。女子は7・5キ
ロ、10キロ追い抜き、12・5キロマススタート、15キロ。
google images though

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>mass start (speed skating)</gloss>
+<gloss>mass start (esp. in speed skating)</gloss>

g-images, jwiki

In Japanese, I think this term is only in speed skating.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>mass start</gloss>
+<gloss>mass start (speed skating)</gloss>

wiki 
mentioned in asahi keyword's バイアスロン

koj katakana
daijr hiragana

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<reb>だいうす</reb>
+<reb>ダイウス</reb>

daijr 世界宗教用語大事典  (weblio)
大臼 in brit's デウス entry

Written with hiragana, not katakana, in daijr.

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>benefit performance</gloss>

daij

prog daij etc.

koj

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij

daij nipp etc.
http://business-japan.jp/2011/10/31/whats-the-difference-
between-blue-and-white-tax-return-filing/

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Yes, we have several oter missiles there - Buk, Falcon, Chaparral.

@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-<misc>&product;</misc>
-<gloss>Patriot (missile)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>

I think the the missile sense could go in the main dictionary.

Daijr, GG5, etc.