I agree. "what o'clock" sounds wierd.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>what o'clock</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">which hour</gloss>

Curzan found that many years ago there was 
an interesting use of “o’clock” that might 
sound strange to us today. “In earlier 
times instead of saying ‘what is the time’ 
you could say ‘what is o’clock?’ or you 
could say ‘what o’clock is it?’”
https://www.michiganradio.org/post/what-
oclock-it

I don't think including "what o'clock" is 
ideal. Maybe a "[lit]which hour" instead? 
if it's really needed to distinguish it.

Saito's JE

to distinguish it from いつ

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>what o'clock</gloss>

OK. Done.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なんどき</reb>
-</r_ele>

I'd go with "when; at what moment", the same glosses we have for sense 2 of いつなんどき.

daij, koj, meikyo
いつ何時	        47407
何時何時	        2373
いつ何どき	1853
何時なんどき	489
いつなん時	329
いつなんどき	11490

According to the kokugos, this is simply an emphatic "いつ". "At any time"/"at any moment" works for sentences like "いつなんどき彼が来るかもしれない" but not for sentences like "いつなんどき大地震が起こるかわからない", so I propose adding a second sense.
Not uk.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>いつ何どき</keb>
+<keb>いつ何時</keb>
@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>いつ何どき</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<keb>いつ何時</keb>
+<keb>いつなん時</keb>
@@ -21 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -24,0 +27,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>more emphatic than いつ</s_inf>
+<gloss>when</gloss>
+<gloss>at what moment</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>every moment</gloss>
+<gloss>at any moment</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>what minute?</gloss>
-<gloss>how many minutes?</gloss>
+<gloss>what minute</gloss>
+<gloss>how many minutes</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

I think this is more accurate.

@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>vain</gloss>
-<gloss>groundless</gloss>
-<gloss>futile</gloss>
+<gloss>empty (e.g. argument)</gloss>
+<gloss>insubstantial</gloss>
+<gloss>hollow</gloss>
+<gloss>fruitless</gloss>

gg5

Not a scientific sample.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>specimen</gloss>
-<gloss>sample</gloss>
+<gloss>(free) sample</gloss>
+<gloss>promotional gift</gloss>

I feel the same way but it's not my area of expertise. I wouldn't know what to change.
I think we're retiring the m-sl tag.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>alignment (in an role-playing game)</gloss>
+<gloss>alignment (in a role-playing game)</gloss>
@@ -40 +40 @@
-<misc>&m-sl;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

I feel it's a bit over-cooked, but it's been quiet for a while. Closing.

I recommend something like this, based on what wikipedia describes. The parenthetical parts could be clearer.
Also found a third possible translation.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>character class (in a video game)</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +28,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<field>&vidg;</field>
+<gloss>element (of an enemy or attack)</gloss>
+<gloss>type (of dealt damage)</gloss>
+<gloss>affinity</gloss>

I'm confused about sense 3. Wikipedia lists two separate meanings (alignment in D&D style games, and the meaning used in video games), and I'm mostly familiar with the latter meaning.

I'm fine with keeping "alignment" (D&D meaning) but "character class" usually means the character's _profession_ (warrior, ranger, cleric etc.) and has little to do with 属性

水属性の敵 means an enemy that's probably strong against attacks that classify as "water" but weak against attacks of a different type. You would do well to choose an attack that doesn't do water damage, or equip items that provide resistance to water damage (because the enemy deals water damage)

I would translate this simply as "element" most of the time, even though the categories don't always match the classical four or chinees five elements. "type" would be a good translation too.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>alignment (in an roll-playing game)</gloss>
+<gloss>alignment (in an role-playing game)</gloss>
@@ -33 +33 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&m-sl;</misc>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -20,0 +21,7 @@
+<gloss>judgement</gloss>
+<gloss>declaration</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>affirmative</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

I don't think "retention" is right.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>standstill</gloss>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>retention</gloss>
+<gloss>delay</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>future of a company</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc. only have 虎鬚 for とらひげ. N-grams:
虎髭	1081
虎鬚	122
虎髯	218
とらひげ	9232
虎ひげ	116
虎ヒゲ	77

A bit bizarre - the standard form comes third. I suspect the henkan systems are just dishing them out in JIS order. OTOH for ひげ alone most refs use 髭.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>虎鬚</keb>
+<keb>虎髯</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>虎髯</keb>
+<keb>虎鬚</keb>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daij only have this as こぜん but 髯 is in the ひげ entry 
and it applies to both senses

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>虎髯</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こぜん</reb>
+<re_restr>虎髯</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +31 @@
+<stagr>こぜん</stagr>

daij

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こしゅ</reb>
+<re_restr>虎鬚</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>こしゅ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tiger whiskers</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>bristly beard or mustache</gloss>
+<gloss>bristly beard</gloss>
+<gloss>bristly mustache</gloss>

G n-grams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ダンボール箱</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ダンボールばこ</reb>
+<re_restr>ダンボール箱</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>段ボール箱</re_restr>

GG5, etc. FB Translators' discussion.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>carton</gloss>
+<gloss>corrugated box</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,4 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1188770">何時・なんじ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1189320">何分・なんぷん</xref>
-<gloss>at what time?</gloss>
-<gloss>when?</gloss>
+<gloss>at what time</gloss>
+<gloss>when</gloss>

Entry created

GG5 (has パシュトゥー語). N-grams:
パシュトー語	1024
パシュトゥー語	491

Best not split.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>パシュトゥー語</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>パシュトー語</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パシュトゥーご</reb>
+<re_restr>パシュトゥー語</re_restr>
@@ -12,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>Pashtu</gloss>

wiki, daijr, nipp, rm, eij
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/パシュ�
%88%E3%83%BC%E8%AA%9E

daij
"In 1822 cholera first arrived in Japan, but it did not 
reach Edo, which is the old name of Tokyo, nor Kanagawa, 
a prefecture located next to Tokyo. During a second 
epidemic in 1858, 30,000 or so Japanese died and 
Kanagawa had a heavy toll. Cholera raged in Japan in 
1877, 1879, 1882, 1886, 1890, 1891 and 1895."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11639554
So there might have been some relatively modern (e.g. 
post-Meiji) use

daijs
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チームパシュート

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>uniform</gloss>

daijr

暗く is the 連用形 of 暗い. It is not a verb.
暗ければ is the conditional form.

1. Scan JMDict example sentences for 暗く usage (~100 examples). Mostly used with naru, but not always. e.g.部屋が暗ければ、電気をつけてください。

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>team persuit</gloss>
+<gloss>team pursuit</gloss>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834763">チームパシュート</xref>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>team persuit</gloss>
+</sense>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙: 【フット】 パシュート《守備選手が自分の位置と反対側のプレーに対応するため, 斜め後ろに走ること》

Ref seems to about football, but it shows up in チームパシュート too.