prog, daij don't list either sense as col.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Wrong definition tagged colloquial.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

daij, gg5

Expanding.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -9,0 +11,16 @@
+<gloss>frosting</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1622430">着氷</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1622430">着氷・1</xref>
+<gloss>icing (on an aircraft, ship, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>icing (hockey infraction)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cryotherapy</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>icing the puck</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>icing the puck (ice hockey)</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイシング・ザ・パック</reb>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キス・アンド・ライド</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<gloss>dropping family member off at a station</gloss>
+<gloss>dropping a family member off at a station</gloss>

Never heard of it called that.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>thunderbird (Australian bird, Pachycephala gutturalis)</gloss>

I was going split this into two senses but I can't find any support for the Australian bird sense. Drop it?

mk

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

overpower in the first section was spelled as "overwpower"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to overwpower</gloss>
+<gloss>to overpower</gloss>

I'm reluctant to have "vs" first and a verb gloss, but this one rather stands out.

OK. I tried adding some more glosses to your second 
sense based on both daijs② and meikyo② but it ended up 
looking weird. daij's 「剣幕に圧倒される」 and  
meikyo's「雄大な景色に─される」 are really quite 
different, so I ended up adding one more sense.
_
I think vs should probably come before n here based on 
the examples etc. in GG5 (which only has a ～する gloss), 
daij.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +19,4 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>overwhelming (e.g. an opponent)</gloss>
-<gloss>overpowering</gloss>
+<gloss>to overwhelm (e.g. an opponent)</gloss>
+<gloss>to overwpower</gloss>
+<gloss>to crush</gloss>
+<gloss>to defeat completely</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +27,7 @@
+<s_inf>usu. in the passive as 圧倒される</s_inf>
+<gloss>to overwhelm (someone with emotion)</gloss>
+<gloss>to move</gloss>
+<gloss>to impress</gloss>
+<gloss>to fill with emotion</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -25,2 +35,4 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 圧倒される</s_inf>
-<gloss>overwhelming (someone emotionally)</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>to intimidate</gloss>
+<gloss>to frighten</gloss>
+<gloss>to threaten</gloss>

gg5: "圧倒的多数で会長に選出される" be elected president by 
 an overwhelming majority [a landslide]

Still kind of A+B I guess, but at least somewhat helpful.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>absolute majority</gloss>
+<gloss>overwhelming majority</gloss>

If we're keeping it, I'd go with "overwhelming majority" rather than "absolute majority".

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keywordtouch/���%D
D%C5%AA%C2%BF%BF%F4
ぜったい‐たすう【絶対多数】
１ 議決などにおいて圧倒的多数であること。「与党が絶対多
数を占める」

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>overwhelming numbers</gloss>
+<gloss>absolute majority</gloss>

A+B.

Twitter (40 most recent results):
① xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
② x
③ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
④ xx
⑤
⑥
unclear xxxxxx

@@ -33,2 +33,4 @@
-<gloss>dark (in colour)</gloss>
-<gloss>dull</gloss>
+<gloss>depressed</gloss>
+<gloss>dispirited</gloss>
+<gloss>down in the dumps</gloss>
+<gloss>dark (mood)</gloss>
@@ -38,3 +40,2 @@
-<gloss>depressed</gloss>
-<gloss>dispirited</gloss>
-<gloss>down in the dumps</gloss>
+<gloss>dark (in colour)</gloss>
+<gloss>dull</gloss>

I checked the first 100 of 170 sentences - all sense 1.

gg5
daijr
revamped sense 4 based on daijr's sense 4:
④  犯罪・不幸・悲惨の存在を感じさせる。 「 － ・い過去」 「 － 
・い世相」

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>murky</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +40 @@
+<gloss>down in the dumps</gloss>
@@ -42,2 +44,3 @@
-<gloss>sorrowful</gloss>
-<gloss>bitter (as in a dark past)</gloss>
+<gloss>ill-boding</gloss>
+<gloss>dark (e.g. past)</gloss>
+<gloss>suspicious</gloss>
@@ -47,3 +50,10 @@
-<gloss>unclear</gloss>
-<gloss>unfamiliar</gloss>
-<gloss>unknown</gloss>
+<gloss>unlikely (to succeed)</gloss>
+<gloss>hopeless</gloss>
+<gloss>unpromising</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1532350">明るい・5</xref>
+<s_inf>as 〜に暗い</s_inf>
+<gloss>unfamiliar (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>ignorant (of)</gloss>

I agree.

meikyo: 主人に客を取り次ぐこと。「受付に社長への━を請う」
wisdom: 私は受付で社長に案内を請うた  I asked for the president at the information desk.
smk (取り次ぐ): 客が来た（言う）ことを主人に伝える。

Many of the kokugos and JEs have 案内を請う in their example sentences for sense 3 but the meaning of this expression isn't necessarily clear if 案内 is translated simply as "announcement".

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -36,2 +38,2 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>announcement (of one's arrival)</gloss>
+<gloss>announcement (of a visitor's arrival)</gloss>
+<gloss>informing (someone) of a visitor's arrival</gloss>
@@ -41,0 +44 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -46 +49 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ご〜</s_inf>

https://www.proz.com/kudoz/japanese_to_english/other/236386
0-
%E3%81%94%E6%A1%88%E5%86%85%E3%81%A8%E3%81%A8%E3%82%82%E3%8
1%AB.html

Heard it used to mean (smartphone) notification.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>notification</gloss>

103 sentences; 100 for sense 1 and 3 for sense 2.

gg5: 5 senses
1) distant (time)
2) distant (distance)
3) distant (relationship/kinship)
4) distant (in an abstract sense e.g. far from the 
truth)
5) distant (of hearing)
daijs: 8 senses
1) distant (distance)
2) distant (time)
3) distant (relationship)
4) distant (kinship)
5) distant (abstract, e.g. very different in quality; 
not similar)
6) hard (of hearing)
7) (as 気が遠くなる) becoming faint
8) (as　目が遠い) nearsighted

@@ -19,0 +20,31 @@
+<gloss>far away</gloss>
+<gloss>a long way off</gloss>
+<gloss>in the distance</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>distant (past)</gloss>
+<gloss>remote (in time)</gloss>
+<gloss>remote</gloss>
+<gloss>far-removed (in time)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>distant (relationship or kinship)</gloss>
+<gloss>having little to do (with someone)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>far (from something else in quality, degree, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>not similar</gloss>
+<gloss>way off</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 耳が遠い</s_inf>
+<gloss>hard (of hearing)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 目が遠い</s_inf>
+<gloss>nearsighted</gloss>

gg5

Agreed.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

G n-grams:
気障な	9240
キザな	34895

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キザ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

I don't think it's right to tag this as an abbreviation. 気障 comes from 気障り but the words have different definitions.

Well, if I was adding a form using 强 it would be here, but I agree it's really off the radar. If the JIS committee never considered it was worth adding to JIS X 0213, it's a good indication of its total obscurity.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>强い</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

I don't think that form is needed. I'm not seeing any evidence that it's actually used. Seems arbitrary to add it here but not to every other entry that contains 強 (and I'm definitely not suggesting we do that).

From rejected 2849353.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>强い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Sorted out example tagging - couldn't find any in the 317 that matched sense 3.

daij gg5

google images is mostly muscles so I moved "brawny" higher 
up than it comes in gg5

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>powerful</gloss>
-<gloss>mighty</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>competent</gloss>
+<gloss>domineering</gloss>
+<gloss>tough</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +26,19 @@
-<s_inf>... に強い</s_inf>
-<gloss>resistant</gloss>
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
+<gloss>brawny</gloss>
+<gloss>powerful</gloss>
+<gloss>healthy</gloss>
+<gloss>rugged</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>good (at)</gloss>
+<gloss>skilled</gloss>
+<gloss>knowledgeable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 〜に強い</s_inf>
+<gloss>being able to handle</gloss>
+<gloss>know how to deal (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>durable (against)</gloss>
+<gloss>resistant (to)</gloss>
@@ -28 +46,18 @@
-<gloss>durable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>firm</gloss>
+<gloss>rigid</gloss>
+<gloss>solid</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>intense</gloss>
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
+<gloss>fierce</gloss>
+<gloss>high</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>dependable</gloss>
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss>

gg5 daijr

@@ -20,0 +21,7 @@
+<gloss>cramped</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>limited</gloss>
+<gloss>narrow-minded</gloss>
+<gloss>confining</gloss>

A note is fine. I think. I was wanting to avoid "charm".

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>spoken to ward off misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">spoken to ward off misfortune</gloss>

I think "charm spoken to ward off misfortune" is an explanatory gloss whereas "spoken to ward off misfortune" is a usage note.

To me, "spoken to ward off misfortune" is a usage note, 
not an expl. A test I suggested on the mailing list: "(I 
think) an expl should be able to be used as a (wordy) 
stand-alone translation of the word, e.g. 'I like two-
person comedy acts' doesn't look too off as a 
translation of  '漫才が好き'"
That's just my suggestion, though.

Daijr, GG5, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knocking_on_wood

I think these spoken phrases are not really charms. To me it's really an explanatory gloss.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<s_inf>charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>heaven forbid</gloss>
+<gloss>God help me</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">spoken to ward off misfortune</gloss>

Having "charm..." as an expl rather than a note opens up 
for misunderstandings, I think (くわばらくわばら is not an 
omamori type of lucky charm)

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</gloss>

I'm not sure the usage note is necessary. gg5 has plenty of 
non-adverbial usage examples for this sense.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>effortless</gloss>
@@ -40 +40,0 @@
-<s_inf>often as 軽く</s_inf>
@@ -44,0 +45,2 @@
+<gloss>easy</gloss>
+<gloss>lighthearted (e.g. joke)</gloss>

@@ -21,1 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1335750">重い</xref>
@@ -23,1 +22,1 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1335750">重い・2</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1335750">重い・1</xref>

iwakoku: 中国の兵法の書「六韜」の、虎韜の巻から出た語。

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

May as well de-clutter this a little.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

With 5k in the ngrams I'd keep it.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とらの巻</keb>

とらの巻 = around 2% of hits, I don't think it's needed.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>とらの巻</keb>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
虎刈り	9989
虎刈	298
虎苅り	No matches
虎苅	No matches
とら刈り	539

Gloss was wrong.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とら刈り</keb>
@@ -22 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>close-cropped (head)</gloss>
+<s_inf>likening to a tiger's fur pattern</s_inf>
+<gloss>unevenly cropped (hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>badly cropped</gloss>

daijr
example: 「 －の頭」

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>虎刈</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>虎苅り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>虎苅</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

とら猫	7646

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とら猫</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>とら猫</re_restr>

g n-grams:
虎猫	10375
トラ猫	162057
トラネコ	9511

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>トラ猫</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>トラねこ</reb>
+<re_restr>トラ猫</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>虎猫</re_restr>
@@ -18 +26 @@
-<gloss>stripped cat</gloss>
+<gloss>striped cat</gloss>

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トラネコ

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トラネコ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>stripped cat</gloss>

daij prog

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>ocelot (feline, Felis pardalis)</gloss>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>wild cat (feline, Felis tigrina)</gloss>

prog

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>tiger's stripes</gloss>
+<gloss>tiger stripes</gloss>

I think it's best to think of it as an entry-wide x-ref (a feature that will probably be added to JMdict: NG).
I've reindexed that sentence and chosen a new one for sense 1.

I don't think the antonym cross reference to sense 1 of 低い is right.
As I wrote last year in the entry for 低い:
  "Right now it seems we have
   低い[1] <-> 高い[2,3]
   低い[3] <-> 高い[1] (and possibly 低い[2])
   低い[4] <-> 高い[4,5]"

The current priority example sentence indexed to sense 01 of 高い seems like it should be sense 03 instead. It's definitely not high/tall.
  銀行はリスクの高い顧客へのローンには高い金利をつける。
  Banks charge higher interest on loans to risky customers.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────╮
│ 高い　 │ 62,758,210 │
│ 高価い │      4,201 │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ たかい │    711,529 │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<stagk>高い</stagk>

gg5 daijs
conflated "high (number)" (e.g. high blood levels) with 
"high (quality)" though both gg5 and daijs keep them apart
split "loud" and "high-pitched" though both gg5 and daijs 
keep them together

@@ -29,0 +30,15 @@
+<gloss>high-priced</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>high (level)</gloss>
+<gloss>above average (in degree, quality, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>loud</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>high-pitched</gloss>
+<gloss>shrill</gloss>

daij

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>drinking</gloss>
+<gloss>heavy drinking</gloss>

not listed as vs in daijs.
https://cjjc.weblio.jp/content/豪飲す%
E3%82%8B
45 hits in google books for "豪飲する"

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Dupe

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>國際</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Not sure about "n" for sense 1.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij
daijr: "〔漢訳「万国公法」（1864年）の「各国交際」から造語され
た。当初は英語 diplomatic intercourse の訳語とした〕"

(not to derail the discussion but I thought this should be 
recorded)

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>diplomatic intercourse</gloss>
+</sense>

I'd argue it shouldn't be there at all.

国際	24523675	99.9%
國際	30964	0.1%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>國際</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Not sure about "n" for sense 1.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij
daijr: "〔漢訳「万国公法」（1864年）の「各国交際」から造語され
た。当初は英語 diplomatic intercourse の訳語とした〕"

(not to derail the discussion but I thought this should be 
recorded)

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>diplomatic intercourse</gloss>
+</sense>

I'd argue it shouldn't be there at all.

I think so.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>

I'm wondering if sense 1 should also be an n-pref?
daijs:
"３ 他の語の上に付いて、安い、価値のない、粗悪な、などの意を表
す。"

It's the first sense in daijs, so I guess it's fine as its 
own sense.

Sense 2 might be better as an etymological note.

daij, gg5

Expanding.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>paltry amount of money</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>farthing</gloss>
+<gloss>worthlessness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>three one-mon coins</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj

The heatstroke sense is [arch] and only applies to あつけ. Not in meikyo or the JEs.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あつけ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>summer heat</gloss>
@@ -13 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>sunstroke</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あつけ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2597400">暑気中り</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

"heat stroke" is spelled "heatstroke" everywhere else in jmdict.

FWIW, it seems to be commonly spelled both ways on the internet.  Wikipedia uses the two-word form, Britannica the one-word form.  Bing report 600Kh for one-word, 1Mh for two-word. 

Maybe it's a US/UK English thing.  Either way it probably should be spelled consistently.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>heat stroke</gloss>
+<gloss>heatstroke</gloss>

gg5 daijs

could have a lot more senses but とりあえず

@@ -21,0 +22,25 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>slight</gloss>
+<gloss>below average (in degree, amount, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>minor</gloss>
+<gloss>small</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>low (e.g. sound)</gloss>
+<gloss>soft (e.g. voice)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>unimportant</gloss>
+<gloss>petty</gloss>
+<gloss>insignificant</gloss>
+<gloss>trifling</gloss>
+<gloss>trivial</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>young</gloss>
+<gloss>juvenile</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of dramatic recitation accompanied by a shamisen (associated with the Japanese puppet theater)</gloss>
+<gloss>jōruri</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of dramatic recitation accompanied by a shamisen (associated with Japanese puppet theater)</gloss>

刺す is rather irregular.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
水を差す	46570
水をさす	18204
水を注す	2612
水を刺す	627
みずをさす	187

saw "水を刺す" a couple times in a novel, ひぐらしのなく頃に 祟殺し編（2003年)
「富竹さんに水を刺され、鷹野さんはちょっと不満そうだったが、とりあえず話を中断してくれた。」
「満面の笑みを浮かべている梨花ちゃんが気に入らなくて、水を刺す。」

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>水を差す</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<keb>水を差す</keb>
+<keb>水を刺す</keb>

I don't think such a slangy gloss helps much.

@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>to be a buzzkill</gloss>

eij

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to be a buzzkill</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

I don't think so.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>adult (esp. person 18 years old or over)</gloss>
+<gloss>adult</gloss>

Is the parenthesised part even needed now?

Starting April 1

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>adult (esp. person 20 years old or over)</gloss>
+<gloss>adult (esp. person 18 years old or over)</gloss>

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20180613/k10011476031000.html
Should be changed to "esp. person 18 years old or over"... in a little under 4 years.

gg5

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>quartergrain</gloss>
+<gloss>quartersawn grain</gloss>

GG5, Daijirin, etc.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柾目</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>quartergrain</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij

Specifically with the voice.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>encouragement</gloss>
+<gloss>(shout of) encouragement</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>rooting</gloss>

I'd prefer it at the end, as it has no sentence matches and keeps the order intact.

@@ -24,5 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>almost (but not quite)</gloss>
-<gloss>close (but no cigar)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -37,0 +33,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>almost (but not quite)</gloss>
+<gloss>close (but no cigar)</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr gg5

both daijr and gg5 keep "almost (but not quite)" and 
"regrettable" in the same sense. I think keeping them apart 
might be more helpful though, but I'm not sure.

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+<gloss>unfortunate</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>almost (but not quite)</gloss>
+<gloss>close (but no cigar)</gloss>
@@ -32,4 +37,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<gloss>almost but not quite</gloss>
-</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 追う │ 1,737,701 │ 99.9% │
│ 逐う │     1,968 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ おう │ 1,414,180 │  N/A  │
╰─ーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5 (which splits "to chase" into "chasing a person" and 
"chasing pleasure, etc.")

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to follow after</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>to get rid of</gloss>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>to follow (e.g. a set order, a trend)</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (a set order, a trend, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -46 +46,2 @@
-<gloss>(in passive voice) to be pressed (for time, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>in passive voice</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be pressed (e.g. for time)</gloss>

That's a very odd gloss. I think we can drop it.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>train-doesn't- stop station</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>train-doesn't-stop station</gloss>
+<gloss>station at which the train does not stop</gloss>
+<gloss>train-doesn't- stop station</gloss>

I will reject this because no sources have been referenced. I'm sure the entry can be improved, but I don't feel Alan's edit is a good 
springboard for that.

>I don't think the romanized "katana" should be in a different sense; they're the same thing.

"(single-edged) sword" includes falchions, sabres, cutlasses, hangers, Messers, dussack, backswords, kopis, all kinds of Dao, shamshir, saif, tulwar, Kilij, shotel etc etc …and also katana, tachi (大刀), tachi (太刀), nodachi/oodachi, nagamaki, kodachi, wakizashi…

So…
Clearly not the same sense.

Not unless you propose making it something like
"(single-edged) sword; katana; wakizashi; tachi; nagamaki; dao; sabre; Messer; falchion; dussack; hanger; backsword; scimitar"
Note that the above list is by no means exhaustive, so there are types missing. Also I used the umbrella term scimitar for all the distinctly different types of Middle Eastern/Indian blades …and using tachi to cover oodachi/nodachi/kodachi as well (as well as 大刀), and the general term Dao, to cover all of the countless different types of single edged Chinese swords
…and yet, it still looks rather preposterously long.

@@ -21,7 +21 @@
-<gloss>(single-edged) sword</gloss>
-<gloss>katana</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>dagger</gloss>
-<gloss>knife</gloss>
+<gloss>(single-edged) blade (usu. knife/dagger or sword)</gloss>

sense 5 - not a Japanese concept, doesn't need an expl.

@@ -46,2 +46 @@
-<gloss>knife money</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">knife-shaped commodity money used in Zhou dynasty China</gloss>
+<gloss>knife money (knife-shaped commodity money used in ancient China)</gloss>

GG5, etc. Koj, Daijr/s

I don't think the romanized "katana" should be in a different sense; they're the same thing.
I wouldn't mind if "dagger; knife" went into the first sense. They were there originally, but in 2007 Rene split them on the grounds that their usage was "arch" (we might say "hist" now.) Then I dropped the "arch" in 2018.

@@ -22,3 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>

As I have come to understand, JMdict indicates that descriptions separated by a semicolon, within the same sense, indicates that the separated descriptions are different ways of describing the same thing.

Also, shouldn't the senses of "(single-edged) sword" and "dagger; knife" simply be in a single sense of "(single-edged) blade"?
Or "(single-edged) blade; (single-edged) sword; knife; dagger"?

…and when speaking of かたな, in terms of a Japanese sword, is is sometimes used to refer to "Japanese sword", generally, and sometimes as katana (in the English sense of the word. What is known as 打刀, in Japanese), specifically.

Note that neither Japanese, nor Chinese, have the same knife/dagger vs sword distinction, as exists in English.
They merely have terms for blades, distinguishing by number of edges, but not length. (though that distinction has become somewhat blurred, in Japan …after they stopped making double-edged swords or combat knives/daggers, and tool knives are all single edged, aside from a few very specialized exceptions. Hence meaning that the distinction had little practical value anymore, as practically all blades were single edged. Until Modern times, that is)
This leads to a lot of erroneous translations. (arguably _especially_ by Japanese people)

@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

All of my previously cited sources
Also https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刀

>I will reject this because no sources have been referenced. I'm sure the entry can be improved, but I don't feel Alan's edit is a good 
springboard for that.

The sources were all the ones I had previously cited!
Why should I have to re-cite all of them, every single time, when I have already cited them?

>世界大百科事典 第２版 katana:

katana? Not かたな?
That would suggest it is talking about the English word, which strictly refers to 打刀.
As it is not the same word, that source is clearly completely irrelevant.

>daijr says 細長い (2ア) and 長い (2イ).

(2ア) and (2イ) indicates that these are sub-senses.
Not what the term exclusively refers to.
Note that daijr also states "3) 小さい刃物。".
Did you choose to ignore that, because it conflicts with (utterly destroys) your position?

…and what about how koj says "1) 刀身が短い片刃の刃物。"
Not to mention "3) 小さい刃物。きれもの。" (this is also identical to sense 4, in daijs)

As for it referring to Japanese swords, specifically…
Well, I could find a whole bunch of different sources, but would Japanese Wikipedias article, on かたな suffice?
The first image you see, straight away, is a French military sabre …and it goes on to list tons of non-Japanese blades.

>/…/短刀など/…/

短刀 is typically a knife.
Note your other source (nipp katana), which states "30センチメートル未満のものを短刀とよび分ける".
Not that there is any kind of lack of sources, that refer to 短刀 as a knife.

@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>Japanese sword (esp. a single-edged one)</gloss>
-<gloss>katana</gloss>
+<gloss>(single-edged) blade (usu. sword or knife/dagger)</gloss>

(nipp sekaidaihyakka)

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>sword (esp. a single-edged one)</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese sword (esp. a single-edged one)</gloss>

brit: katana entry:
太刀 (たち) ，打刀 (うちがたな) ，脇差 (わきざし) ，短刀などの日本刀の総称。

世界大百科事典 第２版 katana:
広義には日本刀全体を指すこともあるが，狭義には刃を上向きにして腰にさす2尺(60.6cm)以上の刀身のもののみを刀という。

nipp katana: 
ものを切るのに適したように片刃にこしらえた武器。刺突用に両刃にこしらえた武器は剣という。刀身の長さが60センチメートル以上のものを太刀(たち)・刀、30
～60センチメートル未満のものを脇差(わきざし)、30センチメートル未満のものを短刀とよび分ける。

koj, daijs, daijr

I suggest removing the dagger/knife sense - it seems to be arch and just risks making the entry more confusing than it has to be.
Saying sense 1 often refers to "knives/daggers" (as Alan did in a rejected suggestion) doesn't match with what's in the references - nipp 
and sekaidaihyakka both say 60cm+. daijr says 細長い (2ア) and 長い (2イ). 
All senses that suggest it's something shorter seem to be archaic.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>(single-edged) sword</gloss>
+<gloss>sword (esp. a single-edged one)</gloss>
@@ -23,5 +22,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>dagger</gloss>
-<gloss>knife</gloss>

sense 5 - not a Japanese concept, doesn't need an expl.

@@ -46,2 +46 @@
-<gloss>knife money</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">knife-shaped commodity money used in Zhou dynasty China</gloss>
+<gloss>knife money (knife-shaped commodity money used in ancient China)</gloss>

Re: "Japanese", 世界大百科事典 and brit say it's spec 日本刀, jawiki says it's not country-specific. Google images are all katana (except 
the jawiki pic of a sable).
but Brit's サーベル entry: 軍用の刀 
daijs' サーベル entry too: ...片刃の刀 / 洋剣
(nikk calls it 剣, nipp 洋式刀/長剣

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>Japanese sword (esp. single-edged)</gloss>
+<gloss>sword (esp. Japanese single-edged)</gloss>

Yes, I don't think I actually intended to remove it.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>katana</gloss>

Shouldn't we keep "katana" as a gloss? It's a very recognisable word in English.

Can be shorter.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>Japanese sword (esp. a single-edged one)</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese sword (esp. single-edged)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>swordmaker</gloss>

daijr: "ひいきにしてくれる客。いつもよく買ってくれる"
daijs: "いつも品物を買ってくれる客。また、ふだん取引する相手。取引先"

I don't think "constituency" is right.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>customer</gloss>
+<gloss>(regular) customer</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>constituency</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>detection</gloss>
+<gloss>detection (of a plot, fraud, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>discovery</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>being uncovered</gloss>

We don't normally use abbreviations like this outside of notes, I think.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">form of comedy orig. performed at people's homes by entertainers during the New Year festivities; precursor to modern day manzai</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">form of comedy originally performed at people's homes by entertainers during the New Year festivities; precursor to modern day manzai</gloss>

spec2 has an interesting history.

see Rene's comments in edit #3

[spec2] is also a (P) tag, so better to skip the tag
(could be downgraded to [ichi2] instead, but I think the tag is simply wrong)

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

i don't think the examples are needed.  if we really want to narrow it down to aquaculture, we should nuke all glosses except that one.  (or add a note.)  also, it's not a suffix. just part of a compound noun.

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>aquaculture (e.g. fish, shellfish, seaweed)</gloss>
-<gloss>culture (e.g. pearls)</gloss>
+<gloss>aquaculture</gloss>
+<gloss>culture</gloss>
+<gloss>cultivation</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>cultivation</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* Clarify and add examples – specifically *aquaculture*
* Add pos [n-suf] (e.g., 真珠養殖 – many more in GG5)

Narrow meaning not obvious from characters (just seems like “cultivation” generally), and got this wrong in class (I said ×米を養殖, which is like *“rice culturing”); read in article on shrimp farming.

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>aquaculture (e.g. fish, shellfish, seaweed)</gloss>
+<gloss>culture (e.g. pearls)</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>culture</gloss>

daijr

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>two tigers</gloss>
-<gloss>two rivals</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>two equal rivals</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">two tigers</gloss>

海獺	3080
猟虎	1206
海猟	204
獺虎	28
らっこ	39908
ラッコ	205204

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ainu_languages

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ain"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="ain">rakko</lsource>

daijisen

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>獺虎</keb>

Agree with the split.

gg5 eij

@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>to put a lot of effort into</gloss>
-<gloss>to take a strong interest in</gloss>
-<gloss>to put great emphasis on</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to put a lot of effort (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a strong interest (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put great emphasis (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>to show zeal (for)</gloss>

gg5
G n-grams:
力瘤を入れる	84
力こぶを入れる	153

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>力こぶを入れる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>to work earnestly</gloss>
+<gloss>to put a lot of effort into</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a strong interest in</gloss>
+<gloss>to put great emphasis on</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

GG5, etc.

I agree. I think this should be もくめ alone.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<reb>きめ</reb>
-<re_restr>木目</re_restr>
+<reb>もくめ</reb>
@@ -17,3 +15,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>もくめ</reb>

Do we need the きめ reading here? There's already a 木目/きめ entry (1476510). 
"curly grain" isn't right.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>curly grain</gloss>

Proposing merge of 2827808 (rather than the other way round), as this is the original relevant entry. This one has the sound clip linked too.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>杢目</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<re_restr>木目</re_restr>

duplicate of 1476510[2] and 2827808

Fork

Except for slang/colloquial terms, I think 
we've decided (in the recent past) NOT to tag 
things that 1) aren't marked as vs in the 
kokugos, 2) are more commonly "-をする"

daijr, daijs, meikyo, gakken, smk
買い物に行く	234071
買い物をする	855570
買い物する	377651

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I'll approve it for now. If anybosy objects, 
they can re-open it.

Duplicate

かいもん is not acceptable for 買いもの

@@ -29,0 +30,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

Adding sK/sk forms.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,3 +23,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -31,3 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

HiddenForm 買いもの；買いもん
(Marcus suggested that かいもん not be hidden)

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Search-only_Forms - "The forms do not participate in the restriction structure"

Not necessary as only 買い物 and 買物 are associated with readings.

@@ -30,3 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

かいもん is not acceptable for 買いもの

@@ -29,0 +30,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

Adding sK/sk forms.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,3 +23,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -31,3 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 凶暴　　　 │ 334,820 │ 98.9% │
│ 兇暴　　　 │   1,672 │  0.5% │ 🡠 oK to rK (daijr/s, koj, meikyo, etc.)
│ きょうぼう │   1,971 │  0.6% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

OK.

兇 is listed with an asterisk as 常用外 in my IME, but it 
is listed.

oK is not synonymous with use of 旧字体. In fact almost all the entries with 凶/兇 surface forms have the latter tagged "oK". In this case Daijirin has "凶暴・兇▼暴" and I've been taking that ▼ to indicate an old and deprecated form. I think we'd better discuss criteria for the "oK" tag before removing them. I view it as flagging an older form that one may encounter but probably shouldn't use.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

I think that's overkill; if anything I'd drop Nils' note. The kanwas have all three kanji meaning the same thing.

Adding AmE glosses.
Sense 01 might be more pleasant to read if we split it into three senses with "esp." notes.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>mustache</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>sideburns</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -43,0 +47 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

髭	831470
鬚	70137
髯	30548
ひげ	1308456
ヒゲ	1320725
髭が生える	725
鬚が生える	No matches
髯が生える	No matches
ひげが生える	727
ヒゲが生える	1411

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Let's just drop it.

@@ -44,4 +43,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>extremely short pulse appearing on an electrical signal</gloss>

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ローソク足チャート#ローソク

I'm sceptical about sense 4. Google returns things like ひげ状のパルス, ヒゲのような波形. Unless we can find another reference (the one provided with the submission in 2009 is no longer accessible), I think it should be dropped.

@@ -37,0 +38,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<s_inf>usu. ヒゲ</s_inf>
+<gloss>shadow (on a candlestick chart)</gloss>

GG5

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/冒涜/#je-69591

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>defilement</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冒讀</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

HiddenForm 冒讀

@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>冒讀</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>curse</gloss>

As for the status of 瀆, see Robin's comment on seq 1726890 (自涜；自瀆). 涜 is "unofficial," a so-called extended shinjitai.

[vt]: shinmeikai, meikyo, oukoku, iwakoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 冒涜　　 | 154,249 | 94.9% |
| 冒とく　 |   6,336 |  3.9% |
| 冒瀆　　 |   1,840 |  1.1% | <- changing from [oK] to [rK]
| 冒讀　　 |      50 |  0.0% |
| ぼうとく |   4,311 |  N/A  |

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manzai

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>two-person comedy act (usu. presented as a fast-paced dialogue, occ. presented as a skit)</gloss>
+<gloss>manzai</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">two-person comedy act (usu. presented as a fast-paced dialogue, occ. presented as a skit)</gloss>

japanese wiki: lists コント漫才 as a skit-based form.

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>two-person comedy act (usu. presented as a fast-paced dialogue, occ. presented as a skit)</gloss>
@@ -22,1 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>two-man comedy act</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>icing (on a plane)</gloss>
+<gloss>icing (on an aircraft, ship, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>landing (a jump in ice skating)</gloss>
+</sense>