I don't think エヌジ is right. My refs only have エヌジー.
Sense 1 is a noun in daijs.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>エヌジ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16,4 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
@@ -23,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・ジー</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5, and kokugo (Daijr/s, Shinmeikai) to confirm

Seems to be able to refer to the performance itself or the footage.

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>blooper (deleted scene)</gloss>
+<gloss>outtake</gloss>
+<gloss>blooper</gloss>
+<gloss>retake</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">good"</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">good</lsource>

Yes, I'll do that, and fix the Tanaka indices.

@@ -13,7 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1005970">じゃん拳</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2138180">ぐう・1</xref>
-<gloss>rock (in rock, paper, scissors game)</gloss>
-<gloss>fist</gloss>

The "rock" sense should be a separate entry, right?
I think we can drop "goo". Can't find a reference for it.
Probably helpful to indicate that the "good" sense comes from English.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">good"</lsource>
@@ -19,4 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>goo</gloss>

OK. Xrefs adjusted.

@@ -18,4 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QVC_(UK)

"Television shopping" isn't wasei.
"Network" isn't right.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">television shopping</lsource>
-<gloss>home shopping network</gloss>
+<gloss>television shopping</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テレビ・ショッピング</reb>

koj, daij, meikyo, shinmeikai, gg5, OED
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブルーフィルム

overly specific explanation, i think

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>blue movie</gloss>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950s-) type of hardcore pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">pornographic movie (esp. one screened secretly)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950's-) type of hardcore pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16 mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950s-) type of hardcore pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>

https://books.google.com/books?id=s7-_Gon5-
a0C&pg=PA300&dq=Japanese+%22blue+film%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=
0ahUKEwjFkqry9IHZAhXL6oMKHZhpARUQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Ja
panese%20%22blue%20film%22&f=false
"blue film - earlier American term for hard-core 
pornographic film"
https://books.google.com/books?id=8sc-
AQAAIAAJ&q=Japanese+%22blue+film%22&dq=Japanese+%22blue+
film%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFkqry9IHZAhXL6oMKHZhpARUQ
6AEIXzAL
"Blue films" (buru eiga) are erotic films roughly 
distinguished from "pink films" (pinky eiga) in official 
circles by the absence of a story element."
https://books.google.com/books?
id=v5LZ30HI6dsC&pg=PA173&dq=%22blue+film%22+porn&hl=en&s
a=X&ved=0ahUKEwierOG29YHZAhUL24MKHUaVDIoQ6AEIPjAE#v=onep
age&q=%22blue%20film%22%20porn&f=false
"In the recent book Nihon eigha ha, ima (Japanese film 
today), Sano Shinichi dedicates an engaging chapter to 
the fifty-year history of Japanese pornographic film and 
video. The industry emerged in the late 1940s and boomed 
in the early 1950s. First there was blue film, a rag-tag 
operation of amateurs and misfits that produced twenty-
minute shorts. Blue film was followed by pink film, 
which produced soft-porn sponsored by the major film 
companies to offset the loss of revenue from declining 
ticket sales brought about by the popularity of 
television. ... Sano's blue-pink-adult trajectory offers 
a good start at historicizing the links among the three 
dominant moments of pornography."

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950's-) type of pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16 mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950's-) type of hardcore pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16 mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>

https://dot.asahi.com/wa/2016120100343.html?page=1
"かつて「風俗小型映画」と呼ばれるジャンルがあった。性的、わい
せつな映像作品を指す俗称「ブルーフィルム」（16ミリや8ミリ）と
言ったほうがわかりやすいかもしれない。
昭和27（1952）年から昭和31年くらいまでが全盛だったとされる。"
https://www.npa.go.jp/hakusyo/s53/s530600.html
”山口組系暴力団の幹部（46）が、ブルーフィルムの密造販売によっ
て組の活動資金を得ようと企て、最新式の自動プリンター、自動現像
装置その他の製作資機材一式を購入し、配下組員らを使って約5年の
間に35万巻（末端価格で約49億2,800万円）に上るブルーフィルムを
密造し、4系列33団体の暴力団を通じて全国各地に販売していた事犯
で、暴力団員51人を含む被疑者96人を検挙するとともにブルーフィル
ム、製作資機材等トラック3台分を押収した（愛知）。"
http://bungaku.cocolog-
nifty.com/barazoku/2005/09/post_7d44.html
"ブルーフィルムは、ほとんどヤクザさんが製作していて、比較的に
取締りがゆるい、四国の山中などで作られることが多かったよう
だ。"
wiki: "主としてポルノグラフィを題材とした、すなわち性的・猥褻
な映像作品、または映像媒体でのポルノグラフィを指す俗称。以下の
項目等が現在の主流であるが、日本では特に、かつて温泉宿などでの
秘密上映会用に多数製作されていた短編の猥褻映画を指すことが多
い。8ミリフィルムが用いられており、多くは非合法であった。現在
は同様の形では存続していない。"
enwiki: "Blue film, term used for erotic films in 
underground distribution in India"
I also get hits for the same "phenomenon" in China

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>porno(graphic) film</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">early (1950's-) type of pornographic film usually filmed on 8 or 16 mm film and often in black market circulation</gloss>

プラ（ス／ッ）〈チ／ティ〉（ッ）ク
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ プラスチック　 │ 2,585,126 │ 91.4% │
│ プラスティック │   227,384 │  8.0% │
│ プラッチック　 │     8,303 │  0.3% │
│ プラスティク　 │     2,851 │  0.1% │ - add
│ プラチック　　 │     2,524 │  0.1% │
│ プラチク　　　 │       551 │  0.0% │
│ プラティック　 │       457 │  0.0% │
│ プラッチク　　 │       293 │  0.0% │
│ プラスチク　　 │       279 │  0.0% │
│ プラッティック │        52 │  0.0% │
│ プラティク　　 │         0 │  0.0% │
│ プラッティク　 │         0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プラスティク</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ プラスチック　 │ 2,585,126 │ 91.6% │
│ プラスティック │   227,384 │  8.1% │
│ プラッチック　 │     8,303 │  0.3% │ - [ik] to [sk]
│ プラチック　　 │     2,524 │  0.1% │ - [ik] to [sk]
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

N-grams:
プラチック	2524
プラッチック	8303

Should have both. (And don't delete things without making a case!!)

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プラチック</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<reb>プラチック</reb>
+<reb>プラッチック</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 隠す　 │ 1,484,436 │ 97.8% │
│ 隱す　 │       525 │  0.0% │ - [oK] to [sK]
│ 匿す　 │       311 │  0.0% │ - rK (koj)
│ 隠くす │       128 │  0.0% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ かくす │    32,706 │  2.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<keb>隠くす</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +16,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>隠くす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Almost all the google hits for 隱くす lead back here. I think the く was added in error.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<keb>隱くす</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>隱す</keb>

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog
daij: "「超過勤務」の略"

I don't think "overwork" is right.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>overwork</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1742500">超過勤務</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>overtime work</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>subject (of a painting)</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>subject (of picture)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>title of a painting</gloss>

I prefer new glosses that arrive without references or discussion to go at the end.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to do continuously</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to do continuously</gloss>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to do continuously</gloss>

Looks good to me.

I don't think those glosses convey the right nuance, which is that the action is done to excess.
How about this?

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<gloss>to do repeatedly</gloss>
-<gloss>to keep on doing</gloss>
+<gloss>to do over and over again</gloss>

daijs
example: "道間違えまくってたら桜がすごかった。"
https://www.instagram.com/p/BSpfJhClMrS/

Most commonly it just means "do a bunch of times", from my 
experience.

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>to do repeatedly</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep on doing</gloss>

I'm putting it back.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>

The note was really intended for わたし, 
not わたくし (I wouldn't call わたくし 
"_slightly_ formal"). The references were 
all about わたし.

My first thought was "no way" as I was taught that わたし and わたくし were essentially the same. But I agree that the politeness, and slightly feminine nuance, not to mention the later senses, make it an uncomfortable combination. I've proposed a split.

Aside: I first heard わたくし spoken in 1982 when we took my elder daughter (then 10) to a Girls Scouts meeting in Nagano-ken. They had a formal "promise" recital which included use of わたくし. I've also heard it used by males in formal speeches.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>わたくし</reb>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +17,0 @@
-<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>
@@ -26,14 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>わたくし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>private affairs</gloss>
-<gloss>personal matter</gloss>
-<gloss>secrecy</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>わたくし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>selfishness</gloss>
-</sense>

https://urapri.net/watashi-ichininshou
"「私」を一人称に使う男性は、どういう心理があるのでしょうか。
男性の一人称は、一般的に「僕」や「俺」が多いはずです。
仕事だけではなく、プライベートの場でも、わざわざ自分のことを私と呼ぶ男性の心理をご紹介します。
...
1.相手に対してかしこまっている
2.仕事で「私」という癖が抜けない
3.相手に良い印象を与えたいと思っている
4.少し距離を置きたいと思っている"


https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13120392353
Q: "男性が自分の事を「私」と言う事をどう思いますか？
[...]
男性なのだから「僕は〜」とかにしないと、女性やネカマ
と勘違いしてしまい大変迷惑です。"
BA: "40歳くらいのおっさんも社会的な場では私って言うでしょう・・・ [...]"
other A: "では政治家も「僕」と言えと。
面接でも「僕」と言えと。
昔の人は全員同じ自称でしたよ。
かしこまっていうのが「私」。
少し緩んだのが「僕」。"

https://www.chishikiyoku.com/entry/2017/06/09/200500
"男で一人称が「私」だと気持ち悪いらしい……どれ使えばいいんだ"

https://kids.nifty.com/cs/kuchikomi/kids_soudan/list/aid_190410280004/1.htm
"私は、ネットでも現実でも一人称が「私」です。
学校とかでいっつもオカマオカマっていじられて
最近ちょっと疲れてます。"
"ビジネス文書などでは、基本的な一人称は「私」ですね。

だからといって、大人っぽいとかは言えないとは思いますが、
その一人称は認めるべきだと思いますけどね。

私は、インターネット上では「私」、
日常生活では「俺」を使っています。"

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11187575106
Q: "男性でプライベートでも一人称に「私」を使う方はいらっしゃいますか？
男性に質問です。
気になる方とLINEをしているのですが、相手の男性が使う一人称が「私」です。
その男性とは特に仕事上で知り合った訳ではないので、なぜ「私」を使うのか気になりました。"
A: "[...] 私は妻や親しい友人には「俺」ですし子供相手には「お父さん」、そこまで親しくない人には「私」・・・"
A: "仕事で常に「私」を使うので、プライベートでも自然と「私」になるのでしょう。
特別深い理由はないと思います。
もっと親密になれば、俺や僕になるかもしれませんね。"

Should we maybe split out　わたくし? I feel it's rather more formal than わたし (could prob. have a [pol] tag), and 2/3 senses are only わたく
し anyway

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Probably harmless.

chujiten

Too many xrefs?

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>superior authorities</gloss>
-<gloss>boss</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) superior</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) boss</gloss>
+<gloss>the higher-ups</gloss>

Not really an "ant".

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1499350">部下</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499350">部下</xref>

ant, syn

@@ -18,0 +18,3 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1499350">部下</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1535490">目上</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1535490">目上</xref>

ずしょ isn't mentioned in the smaller kokugos.
We have the corresponding reading on 図書館 marked as outdated.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daij, koj

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ずしょ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>playing wind instruments</gloss>
+<gloss>playing (a wind instrument)</gloss>
+<gloss>blowing</gloss>

I think this is sufficient. We don't have "one's height" for 身長 or "one's age" for 年齢.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>body weight</gloss>
-<gloss>one's weight</gloss>
+<gloss>(body) weight</gloss>

prog daijs

@@ -18,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>body weight (usu. one's own)</gloss>
+<gloss>body weight</gloss>
+<gloss>one's weight</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 知覚　 │ 494,444 │
│ 智覚　 │     222 │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, shinmeikai)
│ ちかく │ 241,139 │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5
daijr/s (智覚)

Can't find any [adj-no] examples.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>智覚</keb>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>sensation</gloss>
+<gloss>awareness</gloss>

Tried to clarify the word is used disparagingly without relying on a note.

@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@
-<s_inf>most oft. used disparagingly</s_inf>
-<gloss>to be elated</gloss>
-<gloss>to be excited</gloss>
+<gloss>to get carried away</gloss>
+<gloss>to get overly elated</gloss>
+<gloss>to become over-excited</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>to be carried away</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<s_inf>oft. used in a negative sense</s_inf>
+<s_inf>most oft. used disparagingly</s_inf>

I thought it might be worth to emphasize it's a quite 
negative phrase. "調子にのるな"

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>調子にのる</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used in a negative sense</s_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>losing something</gloss>
+<gloss>loss</gloss>
+<gloss>going missing</gloss>

gg5, daij, shinmeikai
略取	24905
掠取	195

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掠取</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +21,11 @@
-<gloss>abduction</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>capture</gloss>
+<gloss>looting</gloss>
+<gloss>plundering</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>abduction (using violence or threats)</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>kidnapping</gloss>

daij, gg5

Also a noun.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>stuck-up</gloss>

The examples in GG5 and prog also use the kanji form.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 　粋がっ　 │ 13,812 │ 30.4% │
│ 　意気がっ │  1,917 │  4.2% │
│ 　いきがっ │ 24,779 │ 54.5% │
│ 　イキがっ │  4,977 │ 10.9% │
├─ーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ に粋がっ　 │    770 │ 30.3% │
│ に意気がっ │    136 │  5.4% │
│ にいきがっ │  1,341 │ 52.8% │
│ にイキがっ │    291 │ 11.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Could add a [uk] tag. I see that sankoku doesn't use its "okay to write in kana" braces for this word, though.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 粋がる　 │ 4,069 │ 62.7% │
│ 意気がる │ 1,033 │ 15.9% │
│ イキがる │ 1,384 │ 21.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イキがる</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

Daijirin and nikkoku only have a yodan (v4r) part-of-speech tag in their entries for すいがる. They reference works from the late 1700s / early 1800s for the word. I don't think it can be merged here and it's not worth making a new entry for it.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/103#issuecomment-1836978316

There are many entries in daijirin that begin with reading notes like 〔古くは「〇〇」〕. Generally the readings are pretty similar to the modern reading and only differ by a dakuten or vowel sound. I think those are the sorts of readings we want to use with the [ok] tag now.

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すいがる</reb>
-<re_restr>粋がる</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daijr/s, nikk

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すいがる</reb>
+<re_restr>粋がる</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:
接ぎ木	47696
接木	72858
継ぎ木	733
継木	311
つぎ木	6259

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つぎ木</keb>

gg5

Neater.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>report of the loss of (that one has lost) an article</gloss>
+<gloss>report of a lost article</gloss>

The camera brand sense might be more common but I think the int sense should lead.

@@ -8,5 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Cheki</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">brand of small instant cameras made by Fujifilm</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -16,0 +12,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&tradem;</field>
+<gloss>Cheki (brand of small instant cameras made by Fujifilm)</gloss>

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>brand of small instant cameras made by Fujifilm</gloss>
+<gloss>Cheki</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">brand of small instant cameras made by Fujifilm</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・2</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>to take a picture with a "cheki" camera</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a picture with a Cheki camera</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・1</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

Entry created

ngrams
ぽっくり	1226
ポックリ	1223

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポックリ</reb>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>with a snap</gloss>

OK

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1056690">サタン</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2856037">ルシファー・1</xref>
@@ -15,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>fallen angel (oft. Satan, Lucifer)</gloss>
-<gloss>demon</gloss>
+<gloss>fallen angel (esp. Lucifer)</gloss>

Note that the field tag applies to 堕天使; not the gloss.  I think the "demon" was OK.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>demon</gloss>

daijs.
キリスト教で、悪魔のこと。神の試練に堪えきれず下界に堕おとされた天使、特に、その首領ルシフェル。

nikk says:
キリスト教で、悪魔をいう語。神の怒りを買い、天上界から下界に堕落させられた天使。

To interpret nikk, Wikipedia says of 悪魔:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/悪魔
キリスト教神学では、神に対して謀反を起こした堕天使（サタン）の手先である。
In Christianity, 悪魔 are Satan's henchmen(one of our many glosses - demons).  So nikk isn't singling out Satan at all (as far as I can see).
And Satan is, of course, a *specific* 堕天使 (神に対して謀反を起こした堕天使). 


堕天使	194658	41.8%
ルシファー	68682	14.7%
サタン	202355	43.5%

Apart from the main comments below, if you do an image search for 堕天使, you'll quickly see that this has a "romantic" use in Japanese imagery that seems somewhat disjoint from actual Christianity.  堕天使, like 天使, seems like a fun concept to play with (like medieval knights) without being overly invested in any particular religious principles. In these cases, I think "fallen angel" alone still remains the best gloss. 

===
I got this term from jisho some years ago, and the gloss collection has always seemed off to me. I'm suggesting what I think is a "better" way to do this. 

My core motivation is that "fallen angel" is essentially a perfect 1-to-1 gloss.  If you want to translate "fallen angel" into Japanese, this term is perfect.  If you want to translate 堕天使 to English, "fallen angel" is perfect.  Everything other gloss that was here just muddies things up. (Lucifer <-> ルシファー, Satan <-> サタン, demon <-> 悪魔)

Almost every reverso gloss is "fallen angel". Why wouldn't it be? And where it isn't, it is never glossed as "Satan" or "Lucifer". 
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/堕天使

daijs just says: "特に、その首領ルシフェル".  "Often refers to the head of the fallen angels, Satan" could be said just as easily of the English term "fallen Angel".  But context is always required.  You can never blindly change 堕天使 to "Lucifer" unless you understand the text.  If you understand the text, that's your prerogative.  If you don't understand the text, "fallen angel" is always safe. 

daijs' mention 特にルシファー is part of the *definition*, to provide information to a Japanese reader about the meaning of the term.  But that doesn't make ルシファー an appropriate gloss.

The number one pinned gloss for 堕天使 on weblio is "seducer".  Another on the page is "tempter".  I wouldn't suggest adding those either. 
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/堕天使

For comparison, eow.alc.co.jp (usually pretty good) has exactly one gloss:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=堕天使
fallen angel

oft. and not esp. because:
1. I'm suspicious about "fallen angel" usually being a reference to Satan in the first place.  Growing up Catholic myself, "fallen angels" was usually plural. Satan has perfectly serviceable names of his own.
2. Based on google search, I think 堕天使 is extremely common in pop-culture to refer to something that is maybe satan-like, but not really part of Christianity.

[fld=Christn] is a little problematic , since there are fallen angels in other religions (Islam) as well.  The names of the specific figures differ.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1056690">サタン</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2856037">ルシファー・1</xref>
@@ -13,4 +15 @@
-<gloss>fallen angel</gloss>
-<gloss>Lucifer</gloss>
-<gloss>demon</gloss>
-<gloss>Satan</gloss>
+<gloss>fallen angel (oft. Satan, Lucifer)</gloss>

gg5, prog
daijs: "また、高慢な人をののしっていう語"

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15,6 @@
+<gloss>stuck-up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>arrogant bastard</gloss>
+<gloss>snob</gloss>

Entry created

Just 高慢 + さ.

Entry created

グーチョキパー	11776
ぐーちょきぱー	4431
ぐうちょきぱあ	504
ぐうちょきぱー	332

I suggest marking グー,　チョキ and　パー as 
spec1, considering how common the game is

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<reb>ぐう</reb>
+<reb>グー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8 +9,4 @@
-<reb>グー</reb>
+<reb>ぐー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぐう</reb>

gg5, daijs, koj

I think we can merge senses 2 and 3.
We were missing the stomach sound sense.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>sound made through a constricted throat or when in a distressing situation</s_inf>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sound made through constricted throat</gloss>
+<gloss>gulp</gloss>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +30,3 @@
-<gloss>ungh</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">sound made in suffering or under adversity</gloss>
+<gloss>rumbling (of an empty stomach)</gloss>
+<gloss>growling</gloss>
+<gloss>gurgling</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005970">じゃん拳</xref>
-<gloss>rock (in rock, paper, scissors game)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005970">じゃんけん</xref>
+<gloss>rock (in rock-paper-scissors)</gloss>

Yes, a rather useless entry.

G n-grams: no matches
183 googits

Not sure what this is.

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>American dream</gloss>
+<gloss>the American dream</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アメリカン・ドリーム</reb>

Entry created

OK. I've fiddled the description as Robin suggests.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/98

I had terms like this in mind when I suggested an Internet field tag. We agreed on GitHub that the tag would cover WWW-related terms as well as technical networking terms.
I think the description of the tag should be changed to "Internet, WWW" (or just "Internet").

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
+<field>&internet;</field>

I'd envisaged the internet/WWW tag to be associated with technical terms in the field(s), and not so much with user jargon. Clearly we need to discuss the boundaries to be used when allocating these terms. I'm leaving this as [net-sl] for now and it can be revisited if needed.

We're using the [net-sl] tag on the entry for フォローバック, for example.

We do have an [internet] tag now. I wondered if that tag was intended for technical networking terms like "HTTP," "SSL," etc., but reading Robin's original comment on entry 2837616・グループチャット makes me think the tag was intended for entries like this one.

I don't think that means it's net slang, at all.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2848223">グー・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2848223">グー・2</xref>

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2848223">グー</xref>

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1046070">グー・2</xref>

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2012/11/blog-post_750.html
"グーパンした" 3k hits

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1279680">構う・1</xref>

lots of hits on twitter

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カマチョ</reb>

Daijr

@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>from かまってちょうだい</s_inf>

Fork. You need to edit the last in the thread; not an intermediate.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>excavation, cave-raid</gloss>
+<gloss>excavation, exploration, cave raid</gloss>

daij

実用日本語表現辞典
6.7m googits

Splitting from 1354380.

Daijr, GG5, etc.

The refs are all over the place, but "sudden death syndrome" seems to sum it up. They don't mention adult or arrhythmic.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>ポックリ病</re_restr>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>ぽっくり病</re_restr>
@@ -20,3 +22 @@
-<gloss>sudden arrhythmic death syndrome</gloss>
-<gloss>sudden adult death syndrome</gloss>
-<gloss>sudden unexplained death syndrome</gloss>
+<gloss>sudden death syndrome</gloss>

ngrams
ぽっくり病	20
ポックリ病	64

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ポックリ病</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポックリびょう</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2055890">ぽっくり・1</xref>

daij
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudden_arrhythmic_death_syndr
ome
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03790738
10004779

I think it's better to play safe and not attempt to qualify it.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>light-heartedly, flirtatiously</s_inf>

It might be safest to just remove it. That, or basing the 
note more closely on the jitsuyo definition and make it a 
"sometimes" to cover our bases. 
"sometimes used playfully"?

i ran this past a friend who is half-japanese and was raised bilingual and i asked him that if a woman said いやあん in a sexual context would it be considered "light-hearted/flirtatious", and after a bit of back and forth, his final comment was "i'm not kidding, there is a rape element to iyan."  he's not the type to throw that around lightly

so perhaps the current note is not adequate

Maybe this?

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>light-heartedly, flirtatiously</s_inf>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>don't (very light-hearted)</gloss>
+<gloss>don't</gloss>

Eijiro

未成年者略取	230 (not in daijs)
未成年者略取罪	No matches (in daijs)
未成年者略取誘拐罪	No matches (in daijs)
未成年者略取及び誘拐罪	No matches (in daijs)
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6270453
"１月５日に兵庫県姫路市飾磨区今在家７のレンタルビデオ店駐車場
で車内にいた生後半年の女児が連れ去られ、近くの集合住宅で発見さ
れた事件で、兵庫県警捜査１課と飾磨署は３１日、未成年者略取の疑
いで同市の会社員の男（１９）を逮捕した。"

from the rejected イキってる entry

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to be full of oneself</gloss>

zokugo
http://zokugo-dict.com/02i/ikiru.htm

mentioned in daijr 意気がる・粋がる entry
and this site:
http://www.geocities.jp/kuro_kurogo/ko-jien01/page8.html
・粋がる（いきがる）　自分から粋だと思って得意がること。実際は
そうでないのに、粋のように振る舞う。　類：●粋ぶる
and a few other places. but not very common

copied glosses from いきがる

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>やばす</reb>
+<reb>ヤバス</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ヤバス</reb>
+<reb>やばす</reb>

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/���
ngrams/twitter past hr
やばす	4 /8
ヤバス	4 /15
やばっす	6 / 0 (2 past 24 hrs)
ヤバっす	4 / 0 (2 past 24 hrs)

probably shares all the meanings with やばい

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/築年数

Pretty common expression when looking at apartments

daij, koj

I don't think this is used in modern Japanese.

Wasei?

gg5, daijr/s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabethan_collar

Daijr, GG5

I guess not. It's hardly regular for 大根葉, but then regularity in readings is often a movable feast.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おおねば</reb>
-</r_ele>

おおねば shouldn't be considered a reading, should it?

Daijr: (「おおねば」の転), WWW images

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>starchy solution formed during rice cooking.</gloss>
+<gloss>starchy solution formed during rice cooking</gloss>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, n-grams

Great word. I'm still trying to use it in Scrabble.

gg5, daij, koj, Readers+

daijr, eij, Readers+

Merging in ブルーノー

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブルーノー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

dupe of ブルーノ

dupe of キムジョンウン

OK

[unc] is for jmdict only.
Also, I think it needs to be noted that this is just a joke name/nickname.

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&unc;</pos>
-<gloss>Disney Sea (part of Disneyland)</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Disney Sea (nickname)</gloss>

Moving it.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2120700</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,3 +7,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>Disney Sea</gloss>
+<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<gloss>Disney Sea (part of Disneyland)</gloss>

It may be popular but so are plenty of nicknames for brands and people. I don't think this sort of thing should go in the main dictionary.

13 hits on twitter past 24 hrs. A lot more 
common than I had expected...!