I think "smoothly" should be fine for sense 2? 

We did discuss pretty much this issue on the mailing list in February ("glosses not matching PoS").

One solution is to push the vs to the front and gloss it as "to be slimy; to be slippery", though this is pretty the one thing we decided 
we wouldn't do back in Feb, on Robin's initiative. I would certainly not be opposed to it, though.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>smooth (of CGI movements, video streaming, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>smoothly (of CGI movements, video streaming, etc.)</gloss>

Reopen

I'm happy with this as it is for now, so I'll approve it and reopen it to keep the general 
issue going.
I can't help feeling that in the general situation with these beasties we need something 
more than a combination of adjectival glosses and adv,adv-to,vs as POS. Also we can't have a 
note for every one of them. I don't really want another (pseudo) POS.

I don't think it's typically adj-f. Also, we should probably avoid using tag names in notes since they're meaningless to people who haven't read the help page.
While I do feel that every effort should be made to have the glosses agree with the leading PoS tag, these onomatopoeic adverbs can be a real pain.
It's an adverb first and foremost, so I think adv needs to come first, but adjective glosses are more useful than anything else.
There are hundreds of adverbs like this. It would be good to decide on a policy so that we're all on the same page.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>oft. adj-f as ヌルヌル(と)する</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as ヌルヌル(と)する</s_inf>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>smoothly (of CGI movements, video streaming, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>smooth (of CGI movements, video streaming, etc.)</gloss>

〈打（ち）／ぶち／ブチ〉〈撒／ま〉ける

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ブチ撒ける │  1,245 │  1.7% │
│ 打ち撒ける │      0 │  0.0% │
│ ぶち撒ける │    679 │  0.9% │
│ 打ちまける │    112 │  0.2% │
│ 打まける　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ 打撒ける　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ ぶちまける │ 67,560 │ 94.0% │
│ ブチまける │  2,242 │  3.1% │
├─ーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ ブチ撒けて │  1,273 │  1.5% │
│ ぶち撒けて │    573 │  0.7% │
│ 打ちまけて │     42 │  0.1% │
│ 打ち撒けて │     22 │  0.0% │
│ 打まけて　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ 打撒けて　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ ぶちまけて │ 78,028 │ 93.4% │
│ ブチまけて │  3,604 │  4.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think ブチまける is uncommon enough to also be hidden.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

smk, 0 hits

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打まける</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ ブチまける │ 2,242 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブチまける</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 打ち撒ける │      0 │  0.0% │
│ ぶち撒ける │    679 │  0.5% │
│ 打ちまける │    112 │  0.1% │
│ ブチ撒ける │  1,245 │  0.8% │
│ ぶちまける │ 67,560 │ 45.2% │
│ 打ち撒けて │     22 │  0.0% │
│ ぶち撒けて │    573 │  0.4% │
│ 打ちまけて │     42 │  0.0% │
│ ブチ撒けて │  1,273 │  0.9% │
│ ぶちまけて │ 78,028 │ 52.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ブチ撒ける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

daijr/s

ゲートウエー is the form in the kokugos.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<reb>ゲートウェー</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>ゲートウエー</reb>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<reb>ゲートウエー</reb>
+<reb>ゲートウェー</reb>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ゲートウェイ	239075
ゲートウエイ	14713
ゲートウェー	1433
ゲートウエー	1168

merging in stand-alone entry. not really needed.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲートウエー</reb>

g ng
ゲートウェイ	239075
ゲートウェー	1433
ゲートウエイ	14713

Not just comp

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ゲートウエイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12 +14,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲートウェー</reb>

Daijr - ワニスの略。

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1149100">ワニス</xref>

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs

@@ -9,0 +10,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Handy that there was only one sentence.

Done.
I've reindexed the sentence.

@@ -11,13 +10,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&sports;</field>
-<gloss>ruck (rugby)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>lac</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>luck</gloss>

Etym split

Let's move that sense down.

@@ -14 +14,6 @@
-<gloss>ruck</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>ruck (rugby)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lac</gloss>
@@ -20,4 +24,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>lac</gloss>
-</sense>

Daijr, GG5
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac

Can't see "luck" in the references.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lac</gloss>
+</sense>

Fixed indexing.

gg5, daij

Splitting on source word.
Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>lead (of a newspaper, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>lead (from a base)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lead (of an article)</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +40 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2837507">セールスリード</xref>
@@ -34,18 +42,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>reed (of a musical instrument)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1140700">リート</xref>
-<field>&music;</field>
-<lsource xml:lang="ger">Lied</lsource>
-<gloss>lied</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">German song, usually for solo voice and piano</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>read</gloss>
-<gloss>reading</gloss>

I think "leash" is more widely understood ("lead" in this meaning is apparently BrE?) and should lead (pun unintended)

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>lead (e.g. dog)</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>lead</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss>reed (of a woodwind, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reed (of a musical instrument)</gloss>

enwiki

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>exhaust hood</gloss>

Indeed!

こんろの上に換気用に付ける覆い｡

Hoood not Food

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>range food</gloss>
+<gloss>range hood</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レンジ・フード</reb>

恩知らずな	4485
恩知らずの	4863

Considering plenty of other 知らず entries ARE tagged as 形動 in daijs, and the ngram results, this should probably actually have an adj-na 
tag as well.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Not listed as 形動 in daij.
daijs example is 「恩知らずの行い」

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

prog

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ingratitude</gloss>
+<gloss>ungrateful</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>dropping sharply</gloss>
-<gloss>decreasing rapidly</gloss>
+<gloss>dramatic decrease</gloss>
+<gloss>sharp drop</gloss>
+<gloss>sudden fall</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>sudden increase</gloss>
+<gloss>sharp increase</gloss>
+<gloss>sudden rise</gloss>

e.g. spoken language (口頭語)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>spoken</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

not to be confused with 'parole'.  i think it's fine as a gloss, but it's not distinct from sense one

@@ -19,5 +18,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<field>&law;</field>

daijr example: 「別荘に－な土地」 「 －の温度」
最適な	5898919
最適の	688077

最適なチャンス	297
最適のチャンス	84

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>most suitable</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>the most suitable</gloss>
+<gloss>optimal</gloss>
+<gloss>best</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>autonomous entity</gloss>
+<gloss>autonomous body</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">self-governing body</gloss>
+<gloss>self-governing body</gloss>

* Reorder defs (more idiomatic first)
* Add “local government”
* Mark literal one as [lit]

@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>self-governing body</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>local government</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">self-governing body</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

I don't think so.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>award</gloss>
+<gloss>awarding</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>presentation</gloss>

g ng

授與	703
授与	683386

see KKrulak's submission at 2837483. 授與 isn't quite common enough to include here as an oK, is it?

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>granting</gloss>

gg5, prog

Not adj-no.

@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>an end</gloss>
-<gloss>a close</gloss>
+<gloss>end</gloss>
+<gloss>close</gloss>
+<gloss>conclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>termination</gloss>

daij, koj

All the kokugos give the same source.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>from the play The Blue Bird by Maurice Maeterlinck</s_inf>

prog gg5 daij

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>bluebird (Sialia spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>bluebird of happiness</gloss>

仙骨の	11915	  
仙骨のコツ	1595	  
仙骨のコツは全て	1573	  
仙骨のコツは全てに	1573	  
仙骨のコツは	1573	  
仙骨の歪み	449	  
仙骨の間	428	  
仙骨の動き	389	  
仙骨のチャクラ	370	  
仙骨のあたり	331	  
仙骨の角度	308

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&anat;</field>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 仙骨　　 │ 83,986 │ 99.8% │
│ 薦骨　　 │    149 │  0.2% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ せんこつ │  1,991 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>appearance of an hermit</gloss>
+<gloss>appearance of a hermit</gloss>

gg5, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>total</gloss>
+<gloss>complete</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>over-all</gloss>
-<gloss>complete</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>time in lieu</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

GG5 daijr koj

add explain (compensate for what?)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>compensatory holiday</gloss>
+<gloss>compensatory holiday (for working on a day off)</gloss>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>talking to somebody in person</gloss>
+<gloss>talking to someone in person</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

「私は 最後のじか談判に 行くところだった」
キノの旅 —the Beautiful World— 第08話 (Netflix)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
直談判	46189
じか談判	244
じかだんぱん	170
ジカ談判	No matches
じきだんぱん	No matches

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>じか談判</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19 @@
+<re_restr>直談判</re_restr>

gg5, prog

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>direct negotiations</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

"Steep", not "seep".

@@ -22,3 +22,4 @@
-<gloss>to soak</gloss>
-<gloss>to seep</gloss>
-<gloss>to dip in</gloss>
+<gloss>to soak (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>to steep</gloss>
+<gloss>to dip</gloss>
+<gloss>to dunk</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>to preserve (in salt, vinegar, etc.)</gloss>

まえつぼ is correctly written as 前壺, so this sense is correctly written as 壺.  so if anything, this belongs as a sense of 壺 with 坪 as [iK].  however, this sense of 壺 doesn't seem to appear in any kokugo and it's not clear that it's common enough to be worth recording, so i would probably pass on it

https://www.gofuku-kawachiya.co.jp/diary/1041
https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/坪下がり+草履/

More evidence of usage.

I have a problem with this edit. Only that quoted source has 坪/つぼ with that meaning. It doesn't have that meaning in any kokugo or kanwa that I have checked. Also, the kokugos have 7 or 8 senses for 坪/つぼ which we don't because (a) no-one has proposed them, and (b) they're fairly rare. If we were to add this sense, I'd want to see the ones in the kokugos put in ahead of it. I've just approved 前つぼ without 坪 because it couldn't really be verified. I'll wait a short while, but I think this sense can't go in solo and certainly without better support.

https://bbth.co.jp/kisste/post-2070

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843424">前坪</xref>
+<gloss>frontal strap of a Japanese sandal</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think units of measurement are counters too.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>

1坪＝3.3㎡で計算すると誤差がでる
http://www.tsukubaland.co.jp/ledge/tubo.html
実は「３．３０５７８５１２３９６・・・・と果てしなく続きます。

How big is your field?
https://www.mam.co.jp/english/saien/select/2.php
1 tsubo = 3.3 square meters

https://www.arrowsrealty.com/column/what-does-tsubo-mean
Relationship between tsubo and square meter
One tsubo is about 3.30578 square meters and one square meter is about 0.3025 tsubo. In reality, the fraction continues endlessly, but ... this "tsubo" is often written as 3.3 square meters

Comments at 一寸 and 坪当たり. I think other numbers here listed as "approx." should also be rounded, but I'll stick to [1] at the moment, which is fairly well supported in mainstream literature (in English and Japanese).

Major Japanese real estate website:
https://www.homes.co.jp/cont/living/living_00088/
1坪は約3.30578平方メートル、1平方メートルは約0.3025坪です。
but:
この「坪」については3.3平方メートルと書かれている場合も多いのですが...

And note, the error between 3.31 and 3.30578 is nearly as large as 3.30 and 3.30578.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.3 square meters</gloss>

meikyo

what a great system.  not at all confusing

@@ -17 +17,16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of land area, approx. 3.31 square meters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tsubo</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of fabric or paper area, approx. 9.18 square centimeters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tsubo</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit of leather or tile area, approx. 918 square centimeters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1838020">立坪</xref>
+<gloss>cubic tsubo (approx. 6 cubic metres)</gloss>

I don't think units of measurement are counters too.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>

daijs

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

I sat on this proposed edit for a while. No references or other support is provided, but it basically chops 8 senses down to 5. I see GG5 has 6 senses for this and Dair/s have 7 each.
I think the best thing is simply to reject it. The entry possibly could do with some tweaking but as usual, there needs to be a case made.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to peek (through a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peek or peep (through a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -44,5 +43,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to peep (through a telescope, microscope, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
@@ -52,14 +46,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to examine (an expression)</gloss>
-<gloss>to study (a face)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1555560">臨む・2</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>esp. 臨く</s_inf>
-<gloss>to face</gloss>

first definition typo
though → through

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to peek (though a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peek (through a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>

Moving it down 1 to save re-indexing the examples.

@@ -48,0 +49,6 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to stick out (a scarf from a collar, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peek through (sky through a forest canopy, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
@@ -52,6 +57,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to stick out (a scarf from a collar, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to peek through (sky through a forest canopy, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 覗く　 │ 744,374 │ 98.9% │
│ 覘く　 │   8,120 │  1.1% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 窺く　 │      48 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijs)
│ 臨く　 │       0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ のぞく │ 474,302 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

first definition typo
though → through

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to peek (though a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peek (through a keyhole, gap, etc.)</gloss>

Moving it down 1 to save re-indexing the examples.

@@ -48,0 +49,6 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to stick out (a scarf from a collar, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peek through (sky through a forest canopy, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
@@ -52,6 +57,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to stick out (a scarf from a collar, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to peek through (sky through a forest canopy, etc.)</gloss>

Agreed.

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/62867/why-皮切り-is-labelled-as-a-sensitive-word-in-the-dictionary

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>

I'd rather err on the side of caution.

It doesn't seem like it is that sensitive though, in practice.
site:nhk.or.jp "皮切り" 761 (b)
site:asahi.com "皮切り" 4,190 (b)
I think the 放送禁止用語　lists a lot of words that few people 
would object to, in reality.

http://monoroch.net/gallery/kinshi/

It's on the NHK list of things to be avoided or used carefully. It seems it can be confused with circumcision.
"最初に据える灸は皮膚を切るような痛みを感じることから。包茎手術の意はないが卑俗に感じる場合もある"

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>scheme in which a man and woman trick another man into a compromising situation for blackmail</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">scheme in which a man and woman trick another man into a compromising situation for blackmail</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>paintbrush</gloss>
+<gloss>pen</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>penmanship</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>writing (composing text)</gloss>

daijs brit
some more senses in daij

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23,17 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>writing with a brush</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing with a brush</gloss>
+<gloss>something drawn with a brush</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ふで</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the written word</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ひつ</stagr>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>(land) lot</gloss>
+<gloss>plot</gloss>
+</sense>

daij

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>virus</gloss>
+<gloss>pathogenic bacteria</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>pathogen</gloss>

chujiten daij nikk

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>virus</gloss>
+<gloss>pathogenic bacteria</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/病源菌
JST, dcbls, etc.

seems to have separate entries in JST etc, but they seem to 
mean the same thing

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>病源菌</keb>
@@ -18,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>pathogen</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>irrational</gloss>
+<gloss>illogical</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>irrational</gloss>

No.

... or were the "the"'s necessary?

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>the bid</gloss>
-<gloss>the offer</gloss>
+<gloss>bid</gloss>
+<gloss>offer</gloss>

daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>付値</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1756380">言い値</xref>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<field>&vidg;</field>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<gloss>mowing down the enemy (in a video game)</gloss>
+<gloss>mowing down the enemy</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/無双-618609
aozora: https://furigana.info/w/無双

there are a few other senses restricted to むそう and also written 夢想

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぶそう</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -18,0 +23 @@
+<stagr>むそう</stagr>

Simplifying.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +22 @@
-<s_inf>esp. in video games</s_inf>
-<gloss>showing off one's peerless strength</gloss>
-<gloss>mowing down the enemy</gloss>
+<gloss>mowing down the enemy (in a video game)</gloss>

Maybe.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<s_inf>esp. in video games</s_inf>

g ng

命知らずな	6615
命知らずの	69300

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>daredevil</gloss>
+<gloss>daredevilry</gloss>
+<gloss>rashness</gloss>

daij

I don't see sense 2 in other sources (新和英中辞典, prog, Luminous, ALC), and the source for the sense 2 examples in daij is from 1688.

@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Best omitted. We don't tell people how to say ます/です.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>pronounced as ゆう in dictionary form but written as いう</s_inf>

Good point. This is more in line with the 
note in daijs. I certainly don't think the 
note HAS to be there (so feel free to 
reject/remove) but I do think it's a point 
many beginners aren't aware of.

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<s_inf>pronounced as ゆう but written as いう</s_inf>
+<s_inf>pronounced as ゆう in dictionary form but written as いう</s_inf>

I doubt it's needed anyway. We don't usually note irregular pronuncioations.

Couldn't this be confusing? 言いました and 言えば are said as they're written. 言った can be said both ways.

daijs
〔 (1) 中世ごろから終止形・連体形の「いう」が融合して「ゆう」と発音されるようになり、「ゆ」を語幹として活用させた形も生じた。現代でも話し言葉
では終止形・連体形は「ゆう」と発音されるが、「いう」と書く。

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced as ゆう but written as いう</s_inf>

daij

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

G n-grams:

化け物	322787
化物	155248
ばけもの	17859
ばけもん	1678
バケモノ	52226
バケモン	9492

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バケモノ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

not ik

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

GG5 daij
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1192934441
"ひねくれる ひねくれるって どういう状態？
...
素直ではない。
自分の本音をねじ曲げて伝える。
膨れっ面をするという意味です。"
daij examples:
「 － ・れた考え方」　「―・れたものの言い方」

I feel like there's a difference between "sulking" (膨れっ面をする) and "being bitter" (e.g. as in ひねくれた考え方) so I split the second 
sense into two.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to be twisted</gloss>
+<gloss>to become twisted</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow distorted</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +26,10 @@
-<gloss>to be warped (mind)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be distorted</gloss>
+<gloss>to get sulky</gloss>
+<gloss>to sulk</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to grow bitter</gloss>
+<gloss>to become embittered</gloss>
+<gloss>to become perverse</gloss>

大辞林

@@ -17,3 +17,10 @@
-<gloss>to be contrary</gloss>
-<gloss>to be uncooperative</gloss>
-<gloss>to be rebellious</gloss>
+<gloss>to be twisted</gloss>
+<gloss>to be curved</gloss>
+<gloss>to bend</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be warped (mind)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be distorted</gloss>

n-grams (8:1)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

〈逆／さか／サカ〉〈落（と）し／おとし／オトシ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 逆落とし　 │ 6,731 │ 68.1% │
│ さか落とし │ 2,041 │ 20.6% │ - add
│ 逆落し　　 │   879 │  8.9% │
│ さか落し　 │    27 │  0.3% │
│ さかおとし │   212 │  2.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>さか落とし</keb>

gg5 daij
g ng

逆落し	879
逆落とし	6731

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>逆落し</keb>
+<keb>逆落とし</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>逆落とし</keb>
+<keb>逆落し</keb>
@@ -15 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>plunging or dropping an object headfirst (down a precipice)</gloss>
+<gloss>dropping (something) headfirst down a precipice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>downhill rush</gloss>
+<gloss>plunging down a precipice</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>earnest payment</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

It is indeed, but it's still terribly common, esp. in longer compounds such as 建売住宅, which is FAR more common than 建売り住宅 or 建て売り住宅.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>建売</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>建売</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>

isn't 建売 irregular kana usage though?　
in daijs it's "【建（て）売り】"

ngrams, WWW hits.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>建売</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +22,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>the asking price</gloss>
+<gloss>asking price</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1496010">付け値</xref>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>Sukhavati (Amitabha's Pure Land)</gloss>
-<gloss>the</gloss>
+<gloss>Amitabha's Pure Land</gloss>
+<gloss>Sukhavati</gloss>

Not yoji

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>the</gloss>

Hanntaigo list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Here's an attempted regularisation and alignment.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>square knot</gloss>
+<gloss>square knot (starting with a right loop)</gloss>
+<gloss>double knot</gloss>

i think there should be a distinction drawn between 男結び and 女結び (and some coordination of glosses), for which we also have 'granny knot'.  it appears as if 女結び is exactly the same thing except it starts with left instead of the right

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2688100">女結び</xref>

Yes, "male style" is hopeless. With several refs supporting granny knot I think it should 
stay. I think it's a general term for square knots, including reef and granny.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>male style of knot</gloss>
+<gloss>granny knot</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Urashima's casket (in the story of Urashima Taro)</gloss>
+<gloss>Urashima's casket (in the story of Urashima Tarō)</gloss>

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>treasure chest (in the story of Urashima Taro)</gloss>
-<gloss>Urashima's casket</gloss>
+<gloss>Urashima's casket (in the story of Urashima Taro)</gloss>
@@ -21 +20 @@
-<gloss>important secret that is not easily revealed to others</gloss>
+<gloss>one's closely guarded treasure</gloss>

家とインテリアの用語がわかる辞典 リフォーム用語集
google images
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_glass_door
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/tamanohana/e/199c56d0dc06d60201ff407e6ab30621

@@ -12 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>opening through which dirt is swept</gloss>
+<gloss>(sliding) glass door</gloss>
+<gloss>patio door</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>small floor-level opening through which dirt is swept</gloss>

daijs does list this (but not certain other -知らず entries) as 名・形動. Their exampe though is 「世間知らずな（の）青二才」 and daijr's only 
example is  「 －の若者」

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, chujiten

It's adverbial.

@@ -14,6 +14,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>utterly ignorant</gloss>
-<gloss>not knowing</gloss>
-<gloss>having no idea</gloss>
-<gloss>(being a) blithering idiot</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>not knowing at all (that)</gloss>
+<gloss>without the slightest idea (that)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely unaware (that)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

daijs
Slightly fewer hits for "つゆ知らず" than for "露知らず"

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つゆ知らず</keb>

G n-grams:
丸のこ	35609
丸ノコ	16294
丸鋸	14563

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>丸ノコ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>丸のこ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>丸鋸</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まるノコ</reb>
+<re_restr>丸ノコ</re_restr>

Ngrams

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丸のこ</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

FWIW I've heard the expression a few times.

I've never heard this in my life. An explanation doesn't hurt.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">building which causes people to feel unwell</gloss>

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/wellness/1986/09/16/the-symptoms-of-a-sick-building/ddc12a78-42e0-4f0d-a5c1-
6f0c30fa5d67/
"The Symptoms of a Sick Building"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1996/05/04/toxic-mold-found-at-sick-building/26e6f698-17ab-4ccd-b31d-691f6885d952/?
utm_term=.1cdd41b1ea35
"Health inspectors have discovered a toxic mold in the rooftop fitness center at Transportation Department headquarters, the same 
building that last month was officially declared a "sick building" by government inspectors after employees complained of becoming ill 
on the job."
http://air.ky.gov/SiteCollectionDocuments/GuidelinesforSelectingAnIndoorAirQualityConsultant.pdf
"Many indoor air quality (IAQ) problems can be detected and corrected by you or your building maintenance
personnel. This section was designed to give you an overview of such IAQ problems. For more specific
guidance in resolving the problem in-house, please refer to AIHA's Operation Outreach publication entitled
Do I Work in a Sick Building?"
https://www.webmd.com/men/features/sick-building-syndrome#1
"... the building may be labeled a "sick building.""
https://healthybuildingscience.com/2013/07/04/sick-building/
"What is a Sick Building? There is often confusion over the definition of a sick building. We hear questions like, “Is my building sick? 
..."

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>building which causes people to feel unwell</gloss>
+<gloss>sick building</gloss>

I don't think anyone ever talks about "a sick building". It's always followed by "syndrome".
Gloss could be improved.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>sick building</gloss>
+<gloss>building which causes people to feel unwell</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 小まめ │    54,141 │  5.1% │
│ 小マメ │     3,345 │  0.3% │ 🡠 sK
│ 小忠実 │        75 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, meikyo)
│ こまめ │ 1,006,363 │ 94.6% │
│ こマメ │       283 │  0.0% │ 🡠 dropping restrictions
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>小マメ</keb>
+<keb>小忠実</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12,2 @@
-<keb>小忠実</keb>
+<keb>小マメ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>小まめ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>小忠実</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こマメ</reb>
-<re_restr>小マメ</re_restr>

実用日本語表現辞典

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
小まめ	54141
小マメ	3345
小忠実	75

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>小マメ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>小まめ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>小忠実</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こマメ</reb>
+<re_restr>小マメ</re_restr>

ウィズダム和英辞典: "こまめに働く  work briskly"
                 "こまめに動く  move briskly"
                 "こまめに水を飲む  drink water frequently"
eij: "小まめに確認する check frequently"

I don't think it's a separate sense.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>earnest</gloss>
@@ -18,5 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>earnest</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>frequent</gloss>
+<gloss>brisk (working, moving)</gloss>
+<gloss>frequent (e.g. checking)</gloss>

daijs:" 量をたくさん売る一般的な商品の価格帯のこと。価格は安くなければいけないが、同時に高い感性も必要となり、高感度・低価格商品が中心となっている。"
this doesn't sound as premium to me.

There's an example on weblio from the 経済産業省 that calls it "middle-income group"

The second two glosses don't make much sense to me (at least not as [n] glosses) and aren't in my version of GG5 (which only has "the 
volume zone")

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>premium market segment</gloss>
+<gloss>mass-market segment</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボリューム・ゾーン</reb>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +11,2 @@
+<gloss>main (e.g. price range)</gloss>
+<gloss>largest (e.g. age group)</gloss>

gg5
daijs: "デザインや人間工学の分野において、背景に対し色や形が際立っていたり、文字が大きくてわかりやすかったりする度合い。「視認性の高いデザイン」"

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>noticeability</gloss>
+<gloss>perceptibility</gloss>

Entry created

"仕事をするでもなく趣味をするでもなくただ横になっているだけの日々"
"選ばれるために練習するでもないし、選ばれず悔しがるでもない"
"高尚な音楽聞くでもないのにノイキャンとかｗ"

It functions like a negative copula when it follows a noun or adjective but it can also be used with verbs. Some examples above from Twitter.

@@ -16 +16,13 @@
-<gloss>it is not (like that) either</gloss>
+<gloss>is not ... either</gloss>
+<gloss>is (neither ...) nor ...</gloss>
+<gloss>nor is it ...</gloss>
+<gloss>is not even ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>after a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>does not ... either</gloss>
+<gloss>(neither ...) nor ...</gloss>
+<gloss>does not even ...</gloss>

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I guess so.

Tidier?

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>it is not (like that)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to explicitly deny one thing while also implicitly denying other things</gloss>
+<gloss>it is not (like that) either</gloss>

Makes me feel tired.

@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

〈鴨／かも／カモ〉が〈葱／ねぎ／ネギ〉を〈背負／しょ〉って〈来／く〉る
Maybe displaying one form which has all the kanji is enough (鴨が葱を背負って来る).
I'm hiding the other 7 kanji forms and dropping all the other readings.

@@ -4,15 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>カモがネギを背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>カモがネギを背負って来る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22,0 +8,20 @@
+<keb>カモがネギを背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カモがネギを背負って来る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +29 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,0 +33 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,5 +35,0 @@
-<reb>カモがねぎをしょってくる</reb>
-<re_restr>カモがネギを背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>カモがネギを背負って来る</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -35,6 +36,0 @@
-<re_restr>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱を背負って来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょって来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょってくる</re_restr>

カモが葱を背負って	25
鴨鴨がネギを背負って	441

Could add these forme too, but it makes me feel tired.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CPDjZ37p_OJ/

@@ -24,0 +25,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨が葱をしょってくる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょってくる</re_restr>

This is a fork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not and could not be used as cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

To work better with the ken'nata entry

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting (often with a rectangular blade)</gloss>

I don't think the "type of" contributes anything.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

I'm fine either way, though I lean towards just having the description.

I'm not a big fan of "type of..." expl glosses as the only gloss. I think it's better to include the Japanese term first in entries like 
these.
(I wouldn't mind "nata knife" or "nata machete" but "nata" by itself is perhaps "cleaner")

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to assassinate someone while he sleeps</gloss>
+<gloss>to assassinate someone while they sleep</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to catch someone off his guard by setting traps</gloss>
+<gloss>to catch someone off their guard by setting traps</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +21,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

Entry created

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kyoha-Shinto
nikk daij

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Sect Shinto</gloss>
+<gloss>Sect Shintō</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">group of folk religious sects, as opposed to State Shintō and later Shrine Shintō</gloss>

Entry created

gg5
a □special-interest [pork-barrel] politician; a diet member who □lobbies for [represents, pushes] (the interests of) a certain □faction 
[clique, industry].

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>influential members of parliament acting for the benefit of the private industries to which they are connected</gloss>
+<gloss>pork-barrel politician</gloss>
+<gloss>special-interest politician</gloss>
+<gloss>politician lobbying for the benefit of the private industries to which they are connected</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>weather-proof</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>all weather (model)</gloss>
+<gloss>all-weather</gloss>

Entry created