I think we need some sort of note to explain the x-ref.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002400">御宅・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002400">お宅・4</xref>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>from お宅</s_inf>

Maybe just skip it, then? I feel like "slighting use of the polite お宅" doesn't really say all that much.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>slighting use of the polite お宅</s_inf>

Rather wordy. Does this work?
Probably the "otaku" should lead now.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<s_inf>orig. a slur based on them addressing each other with the polite second-person pronoun お宅</s_inf>
+<s_inf>slighting use of the polite お宅</s_inf>
+<gloss>otaku</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>otaku</gloss>

Helpful?

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>orig. a slur based on them addressing each other with the polite second-person pronoun お宅</s_inf>

日本語表現辞典

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>favourite printing (edition)</gloss>
-<gloss>favorite printing</gloss>

No further discussion.

Reopen.

格段	1060040
格段が	73
格段な	1156
格段の	84578
格段に	926670
Daijr: （ 名 ・形動 ） ［文］ ナリ

Those n-grams tell the story. It's not a noun (despite Daijirin's usual "名") and it's far more に/の than な. In fact almost all the JE examples are 格段の and 格段に.
I'll approve and reopen in case there's further discussion. I think staying with adjectival glosses, which is what all the JEs have, is appropriate.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,2 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij eij gg5

I don't think this is an adverb (all adverbial usage I see in the eij/gg5 examples is ～に)
［文］ in daijr. Maybe we should have a [literary] tag too?

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -20,2 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>remarkable (difference</gloss>
-<gloss>) noticeable</gloss>
+<gloss>remarkable (difference)</gloss>
+<gloss>marked</gloss>
+<gloss>noticeable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=格段

@@ -18 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>special</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>dramatic (improvement)</gloss>
+<gloss>remarkable (difference</gloss>
+<gloss>) noticeable</gloss>
+<gloss>(far) better</gloss>
@@ -20 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>remarkable</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Yes, I think you're right.

If there's an を, we don't usually consider it [vs].
I think 食事する is always "eat" or "have a meal".
Prog doesn't have any 食事する examples for the diet sense.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

I think so.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1090656820
"細い人はどんな食事をしているの？"

Shouldn't the 2nd sense be vs too?

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Plenty of 〜な examples on Twitter for sense 2. I don't think it's ever used as a noun.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss g_type="fig">emperor of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>Emperor (of Japan)</gloss>

Sorry. I overlooked that. I'll split them off. (2836999)

@@ -15,8 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かむ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Thoughts on my suggestion regarding かむ/かん?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_of_the_sea

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>control of the seas</gloss>
+<gloss>control of the sea</gloss>
+<gloss>command of the sea</gloss>

gg5
jwiki: "NATO（北大西洋条約機構）及びアメリカ国防総省は「control of the air（制空権）」を、完全に航空脅威を取り除き制圧した状態である「Air supremacy」と、一時的に航空脅威を排除して諸作戦を実施しやすくする「Air superiority」の段階に分けている。 日本では、前者の段階を「制空権」、後者の段階を「航空優勢(こうくうゆうせい、英: air superiority）」と区別することもある["

I think "supremacy" is a better fit here.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>air superiority</gloss>
-<gloss>mastery of the air</gloss>
+<gloss>control of the air</gloss>
+<gloss>air supremacy</gloss>

The kokugos and prog split.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1269590">後継・こうけい・2</xref>
@@ -28,0 +28,4 @@
+<gloss>inheritor</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Aligning xref.

@@ -27,2 +27,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1269590">後継・こうけい・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1269590">後継・こうけい・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1269590">後継・こうけい・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1269590">後継・こうけい・2</xref>

ok

OK

@@ -26,4 +25,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>(I'm) afraid</gloss>
-</sense>

Can we get rid of the int sense as well? Same issue as with the suggested new sense, the subject isn't the speaker but a particular thing 
that's scary.

Yes, I can see that's the way it has to be. We could do with a gloss like "afraid-making".

@@ -27,7 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<s_inf>often as 〜が怖い</s_inf>
-<gloss>afraid</gloss>
-<gloss>frightened</gloss>
-<gloss>scared</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>

Even in the sentence 私は犬が恐い, 犬 is still the subject so I don't think we can translate this is as "afraid". The literal translation is "As for me, dogs are frightening".
I don't see it as a separate sense.

http://www.edrdg.org/cgi-bin/wwwjdic/wwwjdic?1Q�ݤ�_0__

A very common usage of this is in things like "私は犬が恐い。I am afraid of dogs." More than half of the 111 Tanaka sentences are using this ...が恐い pattern, but we don't have "afraid" in the main sense.
The JEs all embed this in sense 1 as examples, e.g. GG5's "私は雷が怖い. I'm frightened of thunder.", but I think it probably could go in a sense of its own. Alternatively the "(I'm) afraid" sense could be broadened.

@@ -26,0 +27,7 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>often as 〜が怖い</s_inf>
+<gloss>afraid</gloss>
+<gloss>frightened</gloss>
+<gloss>scared</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog

I think "interrupt" and  "cut into (a conversation)" are better as translations for 口を挟む or 言葉を挟む. I've added some more glosses.
I've made a separate sense for "catch (a finger, etc.)" (as in meikyo). It looks a bit out of place in sense 1.
Added a "to harbour" sense (in GG5 and daijs).
The sentences need updating (only 3 are indexed).

@@ -26,4 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to hold between</gloss>
-<gloss>to grip with (from both sides)</gloss>
-<gloss>to nip</gloss>
-<gloss>to catch (e.g. one's finger in a door)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold between (e.g. one's fingers, chopsticks)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grip (from both sides)</gloss>
@@ -41,0 +40,9 @@
+<gloss>to catch (e.g. a finger in a door)</gloss>
+<gloss>to trap</gloss>
+<gloss>to pinch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to insert (e.g. a break into proceedings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to interpose (e.g. an objection)</gloss>
@@ -43,2 +50 @@
-<gloss>to interrupt</gloss>
-<gloss>to cut into (a conversation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw in (e.g. a joke)</gloss>
@@ -49,0 +56 @@
+<gloss>to have between each other</gloss>
@@ -51 +58,6 @@
-<gloss>to have between each other</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to harbour (feelings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cast (e.g. doubt)</gloss>

http://yourei.jp/異論を挟む

異論を挟む
口を挟む
言葉を挟む

@@ -37,0 +38,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +43,2 @@
+<gloss>to interrupt</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut into (a conversation)</gloss>

The sense 1/2 split is subtle. I had trouble aligning examples.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>company (or restaurant, place, etc.) that caters to a specific clientele</gloss>
+<gloss>company (or restaurant, place, etc.) that caters to or is popular with a specific clientele</gloss>

gg5: 芸能人御用達のレストラン restaurant that caters to celebrities; a celebrity hideout.
https://eigobu.jp/magazine/goyoutashi
"明日は気前よく人気モデル御用達のエステへ行く予定だ。"
"2ちゃんねらー御用達のサイトを覗いてみる。"

I think it's always n-suf, based on the examples I've seen, but I could be wrong.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +28,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>purveyor (esp. to the government, Imperial Household, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>purveyor (to the Imperial Household, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>company (or restaurant, place, etc.) that caters to a specific clientele</gloss>

The two aren't exclusive.

@@ -30,2 +30,1 @@
-<gloss>purveyor (esp. to the government)</gloss>
-<gloss>purveyor to the Imperial Household</gloss>
+<gloss>purveyor (esp. to the government, Imperial Household, etc.)</gloss>

GG5

* Add pos [n-suf] (v. frequently suffix: purveyor to …) and adj-no (can modify)
* Generalize sense – can be purveyor to anyone (GG5 notes celebrities), but generally government or emperor

@@ -28,1 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>purveyor to the government</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>purveyor (esp. to the government)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
+<gloss>peevish</gloss>
+<gloss>querulous</gloss>

daij

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こむつかしい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,3 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
-<gloss>fastidious</gloss>
-<gloss>tortuous</gloss>
+<gloss>slightly difficult</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat bothersome</gloss>

daijr/s and koj just have "食べ物". Meikyo has "食べ物。特に、病気の治療に役立てるものとしての食べ物。"

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>dietary cure</gloss>
+<gloss>food (esp. for a medical diet)</gloss>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_nutrition_therapy

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>dietary cure</gloss>
+<gloss>diet therapy</gloss>
+<gloss>medical nutrition therapy</gloss>

Looks OK.

See if this works.

@@ -13,0 +14,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1669490">混合機</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. 混合機</s_inf>
+<gloss>mixer (ingredients, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>blender</gloss>
+</sense>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/混合器

This is usually used in the context of coaxial splitters/combiners, as in cable TV, etc. 
There is a question as to whether this entry could/should be merged with 混合機, as has been done with many other ~器/~機 terms. From what I'm seeing 混合機 is always a mixer/blender of materials, ingredients, etc. and 混合器 is usually just for frequencies, but Eijiro has a few outliers:
■ジェット混合器 : jet mixer
■ホウ酸混合器 : boric acid blender
■混合器具 : mixing tool
A full merge is probably not appropriate, but maybe a second sense for this one with a "usu. 混合機" comment?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>mixer (frequency-changer)</gloss>
+<gloss>(frequency) mixer</gloss>

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>portion</gloss>

i'm with Robin, and i'm fine with it as is.  even nikkoku doesn't have it as a counter.  IMO, we don't need to record every marginal-use case, esp. since 一食 and 二食, etc. should have their own entries if they are supported by kokugos

一食（いちじき；いっしょく）、二食（にじき）
https://kotobank.jp/word/一食-433348
https://kotobank.jp/word/二食-591602

三食 is usually read as さんしょく but 
https://kotobank.jp/word/下種も三食上﨟も三食-256253
https://kotobank.jp/word/下種も三食上臈も三食-2034099

I'm only seeing "食べ物。食物。" for じき.

@@ -35 +34,0 @@
-<stagr>じき</stagr>

どうしようもない	1572389	96.7%
どうしょうもない	54199	3.3%

rare kana candidate maybe

@@ -30,0 +31,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>どうしょうもない</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

jitsuyo (どう仕様もない):「どうしようもない」の不適切な表記。漢字を用いる場合には普通「如何しようもない」などと書く。

仕様 is irregular here. The しよう in どうしようもない is the volitional form of する, not a noun. Note that daijs has 仕様もない for しょうもない but only 如何しようも無い for どうしようもない.

One more counterpoint to myself you might also consider:
どう仕様も無い[rK]
all else [sK].

This provides all of the "reasonable" kanji for the entry (如何 excluded).  I find that it can be easier to understand a long string of kana when you unambiguously understand the associated kanji form, even if the kanji are not ordinarily used.

While it's in my previous treatise somewhere, I'll just add succinctly "I agree".  Will try for some more condensed edits going forward.

I think all the kanji forms can be sK.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daij

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -8,0 +10,6 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>short (in height)</gloss>
+<gloss>stumpy</gloss>
+<gloss>tiny</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -10,3 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>short (person)</gloss>
-<gloss>shorty</gloss>
-<gloss>stumpy</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>short (trousers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>undersized</gloss>

Entry created

I agree that "being" is unnecessary.

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>being unable to leave the work at hand</gloss>
-<gloss>being right in the middle of something</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to leave the work at hand</gloss>
+<gloss>right in the middle of something</gloss>

手が離せない	20535
手が放せない	2076
手がはなせない	807
Eijiro (several examples, e.g. "今ちょっと手が放せないんだ : I'm a kind of in the middle of something."), Tanaka: 申し訳ありませんが、ただいまルーニー氏は手が放せません。

A lot of people are using 放せない, probably because it's the same reading and a similar meaning. I'm not sure it warrants an "iK".
Not sure the "being" is needed.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手が放せない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手がはなせない</keb>
@@ -15,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>tied up</gloss>
+<gloss>busy</gloss>

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>having to continue doing the work at hand</gloss>
-<gloss>right in the middle of something</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>being unable to leave the work at hand</gloss>
+<gloss>being right in the middle of something</gloss>

打っ掛け	0	0.0%
ぶっ掛け	25252	6.0%
ぶっかけ	396268	94.0%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ぶっ掛け</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,2 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2138780">打っ掛け蕎麦</xref>
-<gloss>dish made by pouring broth over something (esp. bukkakesoba)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2138780">ぶっかけそば</xref>
+<gloss>dish made by pouring broth over something (esp. bukkake soba)</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +29 @@
-<gloss>bukkake</gloss>
-<gloss>ejaculation onto someone's face</gloss>
+<gloss>bukkake (ejaculation onto someone's face)</gloss>

One sees the romaji version around.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>bukkake</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Trimming. 神の申 is not a radical.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>written using full-width characters that resemble the radicals in 神</s_inf>
+<s_inf>written with characters resembling 神</s_inf>

Aligning.
I think there should be a note to explain the weird orthography.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<s_inf>written using full-width characters that resemble the radicals in 神</s_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>amazing</gloss>

Keeping it after all. See the comments on 1364440.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1364440">神・かみ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1364440">神・かみ・2</xref>
@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>God!</gloss>

this is in kojien, so it shouldn't be deleted.  and it can't be merged because it would fail the 2/3 rule.  you would have a stronger case for deleting こわっ because at least that one is not in a major kokugo

I feel like this should either be merged with こわっ or just outright deleted. I'm not even sure that こわっ has to be an entry. PLenty of i-
adjectives can be conjugated/pronounced the same way (まずい→まずっ、低い→低っ, etc.)

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1593480">怖い</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1593480">怖い・2</xref>

Entry created

OK.

G n-grams:
怖っ	35798
高っ	53913
寒っ	22149
やばっ	34635

Given that we don't have any other "[adjective stem]っ" entries, I'm not sure we should be making an exception for こわっ even if it is more common that こわ.
I suspect the reason that koj (and daijs) have こわ as an entry at all is that it's the only adjective that can be written in this form (when used as an interjection). With others, it's always 高っ, 寒っ, etc., never たか、さむ.

It strikes me odd to keep こわ but remove こわっ - my impression is that this is many more times common. Considering that こわ is in koj, I 
agree that we should keep that entry, but I'm wondering if we can't bend the 2/3 rule just a little (we've done it before) to include this 
in the こわ entry? Just a thought, though.

I agree with Marcus's comments about this under 2259840. Not needed.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1593480">怖い</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1593480">怖い・2</xref>

gg5
範囲内 and
の範囲内に

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as ～の範囲内</s_inf>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>within range</gloss>
+<gloss>within the limits (of...)</gloss>
+<gloss>within (a) range</gloss>

"また、個人情報の使用方法及び範囲は、その目的の範囲内とし、適切に取り扱います"
http://www.kunitachi.ac.jp/privacy.html

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

daij

GG5/prog don't like "somehow"/"slightly" for the 小-adjectives but daij are explicit about this and their definitions match well with my own 
understanding of these words. Saying something is 小汚い instead of 汚い carries either the implication that it's only vaguely/not entirely 
汚い.

@@ -12,2 +12,8 @@
-<gloss>dirty</gloss>
-<gloss>sloppy</gloss>
+<gloss>somehow dirty</gloss>
+<gloss>slightly dirty</gloss>
+<gloss>dingy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>somewhat base</gloss>
+<gloss>vaguely underhanded</gloss>

Entry created

I guess so. I've added 勢い余って and 勢いあまって entries to the special glossing list.

jitsuyou: https://www.weblio.jp/content/勢い余る 
G n-grams:
勢い余って	91123
勢い余る	        635

Although this is almost always in the form 勢い余って, I don't think we can adequately convey the meaning without verb glosses.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>勢い余って</keb>
+<keb>勢い余る</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>勢いあまって</keb>
+<keb>勢いあまる</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>いきおいあまって</reb>
+<reb>いきおいあまる</reb>
@@ -15,2 +15,11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>overenthusiastically</gloss>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. as 勢い余って</s_inf>
+<gloss>to have excess momentum (from going too fast, using too much force, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. as 勢い余って</s_inf>
+<gloss>to get carried away</gloss>
+<gloss>to go overboard</gloss>
+<gloss>to overdo (something)</gloss>

lots of web hits for both forms

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勢いあまって</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/勢い余って～  
http://ameblo.jp/boons-salon/day-20120412.html

I found some mentions of the verbal form 勢い余る, but no definitions, and from what I could tell the って form is more common.

Reverso

I guess so.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6433404
旧統一教会との関係、与野党の「申告」相次ぐ…末松文科相「常識の範囲内でやましいものない」

Saw this in the news just now and thought it's a shame this was deleted.
I still think this type of entry is helpful, for all the reasons mentioned reasons. Could the decision to delete it be revisited?

OK

Ngrams / eij examples / NINJAL 名詞＋の＋範囲 (out of 3411種類)
常識の範囲	73035 / 16 / 516 (5th most common)
良識の範囲	11499 / 1 / -

予算の範囲	73196 / 4 (all as ～内) / 830 (4th)
想定の範囲	86378 / 0 / 229
予想の範囲	29165 / 1 / 102
法律の範囲	11908 / 9 / 162
ルールの範囲	4549 / 1 / -

I do think there's a difference between 常識～ (and also 想定～) and 予算～ as they are to my mind less obvious and compositional than 
and used in a more idiomatic (non-literal) way and not what an English-speaker would come up with, translating from English. I still 
think this and/or the -内-less version should be an entry/entries, but I won't protest if this is deleted. (it's about time we make a 
decision either way)

For comparison, some other common expressions that contain "範囲内": 予算の範囲内, 想定の範囲内, 予想の範囲内, 法律の範囲内, ルールの範囲内.
I don't feel there's anything that makes 常識の範囲内 more worthy of inclusion than the above examples (and I'm not suggesting we add all of them).

Daijrin: "非弁提携弁護士の略", and links to 提携弁護士

Trimming

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>partnership between a lawyer and a non-licensed individual in providing attorney services (punishable by law)</gloss>
+<gloss>partnership between a lawyer and non-lawyer in providing law services (illegal)</gloss>

https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/activity/improvement/gyosai.html

OK

jitsuyo: "よっちゃんに意味はない”

It's similar to the expression 当たり前田の
クラッカー

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>Mr. (Mrs.) Happy-Go-Lucky</gloss>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<gloss>no problem</gloss>
+<gloss>piece of cake</gloss>

よっちゃん	464748
余裕のよっちゃん	6511
The hatena link says of よっちゃん "世間的には「余裕（よゆう）」の「よ」との単なる語呂合わせだという説が有力である。"

I wonder if we need a よっちゃん entry instead/as well? If the 「よ」 is from 余裕 it seems rather circular.

hatena, nicopedia
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keywordtouch/;%
CD%B5%A4%CE%A4%E8%A4%C3%A4%C1%A4%E3%A4%F3
https://dic.nicovideo.jp/t/a/余裕のよっちゃ
ん
g ng
余裕のよっちゃん	6511

I'm sure sb else can come up with better 
glosses.

Probably not - I saw the 中世以降 and skipped that it only applied to one reading.
As for 語素 - ええと. That's hard to map. Probably n-pref is as good as anything.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

Should this really be tagged arch?　神主 is 
not an arch word. And is n-pref really the 
right PoS for 語素?

daijs: "かむ【神】［語素］「かみ（神）」が複合語を構成するときに現れる語形。中世以降「かん」とも発音。「神風」「神さぶ」"

See 1364440 discussion.

gg5: "the disposition [deployment] 《of troops》 (in preparation) for battle."
jitsuyou: "軍における兵士や装備品などを、実際の戦闘で機能するように準備すること、いつでも実戦において使用できる状態にすることなどを意味する語。"

It does include troops.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>deployment of warcraft, warplane, missile etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>deployment of troops, equipment, etc. (in preparation for battle)</gloss>

this word is not for trooops

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>deployment of troops for battle</gloss>
-<gloss>disposition of trooops</gloss>
+<gloss>deployment of warcraft, warplane, missile etc.</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>deployment of weapon</gloss>
+<gloss>deployment of troops for battle</gloss>
+<gloss>disposition of trooops</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/実戦配備

Daijr, GG5

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/食品ロス

サーチュイン	460
サーチュイン遺伝子	< 20
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirtuin

サーチュイン遺伝子 would be "sirtuin gene". It's A+B and not that common.
"biochem" rather than "chem".

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>サーチュイン遺伝子</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -8 +5 @@
-<reb>サーチュインいでんし</reb>
+<reb>サーチュイン</reb>
@@ -11,0 +9 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サーチュイン遺伝子

g ng
どこでもドア	145906
daijs+

Arguably common enough to include in jmdict (rather than enam)

Reason?

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>killing effectiveness</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>killing power</gloss>
+<gloss>lethality</gloss>
+<gloss>killing effectiveness</gloss>

bing 583,000 results

"lethality" is certainly more common, but its meaning may not be so clear to all users. That's why I put in a second gloss. GG5 leads with "effectiveness". Relative frequencies of the English glosses shouldn't be the sole reason for deleting them.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>killing effectiveness</gloss>

Google Ngram Viewer: '[killing effectiveness]', '[lethality]', 1800-2019 in English. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=killing+effectiveness,+lethality&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>killing effectiveness</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>killing power</gloss>
+<gloss>lethality</gloss>
+<gloss>killing effectiveness</gloss>

bing 583,000 results

eij wiki

OK. I may add to the 全角文字 entry to highlight the difference.

https://wa3.i-3-i.info/word15259.html

They aren't the same thing. An [expl] gloss might be helpful but I'm not sure how to word it.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2185100">全角文字</xref>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">character with a doubled width and/or height</gloss>

倍角文字	776
全角文字	111057

全角文字 is much more widely used.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2185100">全角文字</xref>

gg5, eij
https://kotobank.jp/word/倍角文字-7212 
https://wa3.i-3-i.info/word15259.html

GG5 has "double-width character" but it can be double-height as well.

gg5 範囲 entry
eij

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Gorouemon</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>Gorōemon</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

http://www.yotchan.co.jp/

Useful for text-glossing.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>hopter (gadget that allows its user to fly, in the Doraemon manga/anime)</gloss>
+<gloss>hopter (gadget that allows its user to fly; in the Doraemon manga and anime series)</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8 +9 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&obj;</misc>

g ng
タケコプター	36452
http://doraemon.wikia.com/wiki/Take-copter

Also 五郎右衛門.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<gloss xml:lang="mas">Gorōemon</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>Gorōemon</gloss>