@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1966830">バイキング料理・バイキングりょうり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1966830">バイキング料理</xref>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<stagr>バイキング</stagr>

Saw a TV segment introduced as "ニュースバイキング" on a variety TV show itself called "バイキング"
https://www.fujitv.co.jp/viking/
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/バイキング_(テレビ番組)

https://www.sapporo-dome.co.jp/news/dm_sports.html
"スポーツバイキング"
"各種運動教室開催！！"
"札幌ドームで、主きり体を動かそう"

@@ -21 +21,7 @@
-<gloss>all-you-can-eat buffet</gloss>
+<gloss>buffet</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>smorgasbord (of things)</gloss>
+<gloss>hodge-podge</gloss>
+<gloss>wide range of something</gloss>

Yes, I've seen that on occasions. I've reported it to Stuart.

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>flaming</gloss>

Yes, you're right. It's the post itself 
that "goes up in flames", not its author.
I think "Internet pitchfork mob" is a good 
keyword/key phrase to include in a gloss 
though because it's a closely related 
phenomenon.

@@ -24,3 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>being harassed by an Internet pitchfork mob</gloss>
-<gloss>receiving a flood of critical comments an online article, blog post, etc.</gloss>
-<gloss>online shaming</gloss>
+<gloss>stirring up a storm of criticism online (of an article, tweet, statement, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming the target of an Internet pitchfork mob</gloss>

"「妊婦加算」が炎上した理由"
"侍エンジニア塾の記事が炎上している"
"嵐、女芸人への「豚いじり」が炎上する"
"市原隼人の「痴漢を仲裁した話」が炎上"

Not necessarily harassment. Usually it's a thing (article, statement, policy, etc.) that does the 炎上ing.
How about "stirring up a storm of criticism online"? I think it's an improvement on the gloss I came up with last year.

daijr/s

Split into senses. I don't think senses 1 and 3 take する but I don't have a reference for that.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +18,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>work outside the office</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>outside work</gloss>

mk (1 sense)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog

-> noun glosses
Added sense.

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>securing</gloss>
+<gloss>obtaining</gloss>
+<gloss>ensuring</gloss>
@@ -20,5 +23,7 @@
-<gloss>maintain</gloss>
-<gloss>ensure</gloss>
-<gloss>insure</gloss>
-<gloss>secure</gloss>
-<gloss>reservation</gloss>
+<gloss>maintaining</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>belay</gloss>
+<gloss>belaying</gloss>

See below.

I have tried again this morning. Repeating search for "確保" and then I clicked examine and I got the correct result. Before making the original submission, I check several times, making sure that the dot was in the right circe, but getting the same odd result, but all seems fine now.
Just one of those things, I guess.

Trying to align with my edit to ちまう. (notes from this entry should maybe also appear in the ちまう entry)

@@ -53,3 +53,12 @@
-<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb, indicates completion (and sometimes reluctance, regret, etc.)</s_inf>
-<gloss>to finish ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to do ... completely</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do completely</gloss>
+<gloss>to finish</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do accidentally</gloss>
+<gloss>to do without meaning to</gloss>
+<gloss>to happen to do</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, nc

@@ -24,1 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -27,3 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to close</gloss>
-<gloss>to do something completely</gloss>
-<gloss>to put away</gloss>
+<gloss>to stop</gloss>
+<gloss>to end</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>to bring to a close</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +33,17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to close (a business, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to close down</gloss>
+<gloss>to shut down</gloss>
+<gloss>to shut up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to put away</gloss>
+<gloss>to put back</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep</gloss>
+<gloss>to store</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -35,0 +51,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
@@ -36,2 +53,3 @@
-<gloss>to do something by mistake</gloss>
-<gloss>to accidentally do something</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb, indicates completion (and sometimes reluctance, regret, etc.)</s_inf>
+<gloss>to finish ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to do ... completely</gloss>

daijs

both daijs and daijr have quite a few additional senses

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +32,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to do something by mistake</gloss>
+<gloss>to accidentally do something</gloss>
+</sense>

meikyo
(3) 他人に対する自分の立場。体裁。面目。
「やると言った━、後には引き下がれない」

just means "pride", etc., and i think it's covered by our sense 3.  i think the way that it is used is a grammar point that i'm not sure we can really address particularly well in the dictionary and might be better handled as an example sentence?

@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>face</gloss>
+<gloss>honour</gloss>

http://jlptdictionary.com/viewentry.php?intEntryID=4791
(13:23) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09fyVVrORS0

There's another sense to this, but I'm not sure how it can be phrased.

shinmeikai, meikyo, gg5

@@ -32,0 +33,13 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>skill</gloss>
+<gloss>dexterity</gloss>
+<gloss>artistry</gloss>
+<gloss>ingenuity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842704">点前・てまえ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842704">点前・てまえ</xref>
+<gloss>tea-ceremony procedures</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

koj

we generally don't xref to more offensive forms from less offensive ones.  the xref is usually the other way around

i think as a first-person pn, it should be glossed as singular.  daijs: 手前の生まれは信州です

@@ -34 +34,3 @@
-<gloss>we</gloss>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>I</gloss>
+<gloss>me</gloss>
@@ -38 +40,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2076920">手前・てめえ</xref>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<s_inf>to one's inferior</s_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1332730">秋分・しゅうぶん</xref>

It might be good to reference (See) 
1332730 also....

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>Autumnal Equinox Day (national holiday; 22, 23 or 24 September)</gloss>
+<gloss>Autumnal Equinox Day (national holiday; September 22, 23 or 24)</gloss>

I like the dates this way round.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Autumnal Equinox Day (national holiday; Sep 22, 23 or 24)</gloss>
+<gloss>Autumnal Equinox Day (national holiday; 22, 23 or 24 September)</gloss>

gg5

-> noun glosses

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>unwilling</gloss>
+<gloss>being reluctant to give out (pay, provide, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>giving out grudgingly</gloss>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>to begrudge</gloss>

Thank you for the amendment suggestion. I'm going to reject it on account of there being no references provided, and I'm not 
immediately seeing anything in daij/gg5 I recognize as having this meaning. I also feel like this is probably already covered by sense 
1 anyway. Feel free to give it another go while providing references/explanation why this isn't adequately covered by sense 1.

Used in the same manner as 始めは

@@ -44,0 +45,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1307530">始めは</xref>
+<gloss>at first</gloss>
+<gloss>in the beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>originally</gloss>
+</sense>

OK. It's really an application of sense 1.
I've added のをはじめ and んをはじめ to the special text-glossing files.

@@ -45,8 +44,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>usu. as た-verb+のをはじめ, んをはじめ, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>after</gloss>
-<gloss>following</gloss>
-<gloss>starting with</gloss>
-</sense>

i'm not convinced sense 5 is necessary.  the note on sense 4 doesn't suggest that it is the ~only~ implied meaning when を is used.  ~を~に is a common usage that i don't think needs to be spelled out entry by entry.

See proposed 2825841. How's this as an alternative?

@@ -44,0 +45,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as た-verb+のをはじめ, んをはじめ, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>after</gloss>
+<gloss>following</gloss>
+<gloss>starting with</gloss>
+</sense>

oddly, daijr says "上の者が下の者に命令する" which doesn't exactly sound like it'd warrant a [hum] tag, but daijs explicitly says it's 謙
譲語 for 言い付ける. (and "自分側の人間に用を言いつける。命令する。"

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>to order</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to order</gloss>

大辞泉

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to tell to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to ask to do</gloss>

大辞林

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つき倒す</keb>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to knock down</gloss>

It's true that "cut (of meat)" still means "part" of the body, but I still think it'd be more helpful to split it out into its own sense. 
Approving, though.

I agree that "part of a body" shouldn't be a separate sense. It just creates unnecessary overlap.
But I'm not sure "cut of meat" can be considered a separate sense either. It still means "part" or "region" in that context.
This is my suggestion.
---
I note that daijr's sense 1 ("position of a part") isn't even covered here. The JEs and daijs have ignored it as well, though.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>part</gloss>
+<gloss>part (esp. of the body)</gloss>
@@ -19,4 +19 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>part of a body (e.g. cut of meat)</gloss>
+<gloss>cut (of meat)</gloss>

It's closer to the daijr definition for 
sure, but is it more helpful for our 
users? I think "part of a body" isn't 
really necessary to split out from sense 1 
from a wa-ei perspective, but "cut of 
meat" is.

I've been chewing over that daijr sense. How's this?

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>cut (of meat)</gloss>
+<gloss>part of a body (e.g. cut of meat)</gloss>

daijr does have two senses:
① 全体に対するある部分の位置。 ② 生物の体で、全体に対しての一部分をさしていうことば。 「身体各－の名称」 「食肉－」
daijr's sense two might be broader than just "cut" but considering compounds like 希少部位 I think "cut" definitely should be its own 
sense, esp. considering this is a wa-ei.

Aligning sense part-of-speech information for auxiliary adjectives

@@ -40,0 +41 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -43 +44 @@
-<s_inf>after the ren'youkei form of an adjective</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the ren'yōkei form of an adjective</s_inf>
@@ -46,0 +48 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

I don't think the xref to 
  [see=1518450・亡い[1]] in sense one is very helpful.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1518450">亡い</xref>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>unpossessed</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>unpossessed</gloss>
@@ -45 +44 @@
-<gloss>not ...</gloss>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
@@ -50,2 +49,2 @@
-<gloss>to not be...</gloss>
-<gloss>to have not ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to not be</gloss>
+<gloss>to have not</gloss>

I was asked about Bashō's haiku which starts :雲折々..  It's usually translated as "clouds now and then" or "clouds come from time to time". Worth adding.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>now and then</gloss>
+<gloss>from time to time</gloss>

suggest moving sense 1→3 or at least 2

@@ -18,4 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>major premise (in a syllogism)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +27,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&logic;</field>
+<gloss>major premise (in a syllogism)</gloss>

daij have the first two senses, but I think there's a third, which I think daijs' example for its sense 2 is actually an example of:
"２ あるものの、成立・存在の根本となる条件。「人命尊重が大前提だ」"
in English, you can't really translate this as "respect for human life is an important condition". An important condition for what? 
Daijs specifies that this "成立・存在の根本となる条件" is specifically for "あるもの" so I don't think you can really leave that part 
out. Same thing with the usage here:
https://www.facebook.com/ppkyoto/posts/937243033133944
picture from a sign in a temple garden reading: "苔もいきものです。大事にしましょう", with a caption by the person posting the photo: 
"これが大前提です。"
Another example:
https://twitter.com/into__the_void/status/1065167741756297217
"落書きはいけません…という大前提はあったとしても、描かれた場所と内容によっては特別な意味を持ってしまうものもある。"
The meaning is an even more generalized version of sense 2, which in itself is probably a more generalized version of sense 3.

In terms of commonality, sense 1 should probably come last.

@@ -18,2 +18,13 @@
-<gloss>major premise</gloss>
-<gloss>principle</gloss>
+<gloss>major premise (in a syllogism)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>important condition</gloss>
+<gloss>basic premise</gloss>
+<gloss>basic assumption</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>something that should be obvious to all</gloss>
+<gloss>something that should not have to be argued</gloss>
+<gloss>something that goes without mentioning</gloss>

daij, prog, gg5

Splitting into senses.

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<gloss>main lines</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>summary</gloss>

g ng
取扱所	40245 (daijr
取り扱い所	849 (gg5)
取扱い所	242
とりあつかいしょ - native informant (daijr only has じょ)
also https://www.navitime.co.jp/bus/aroundBusStop/?spt=02022.1126183
"東京メトロ お忘れ物総合取扱所とうきょうめとろおわすれものそうごうとりあつかいしょ" (furigana)
http://www.archives.city.amagasaki.hyogo.jp/apedia/index.php?
key=%E5%B0%BC%E3%83%B6%E5%B4%8E%E9%83%B5%E4%BE%BF%E5%8F%96%E6%89%B1%E6%89%80
"尼ヶ崎郵便取扱所
あまがさきゆうびんとりあつかいしょ"
daijr 
"事物を取り扱う場所。 「手荷物－」"
gg5 (office, agency)
daijs
ロストアンドファウンド
遺失物取扱所。
came across the similar word 取扱店 on kuroneko's Japanese site.
kuroneko's English website also says "sales office/agency"
DHL USA has "service point/drop box"
UPS too has "drop box" and "drop off location"
g ng
取扱所	40245 (daijr
取り扱い所	849 (gg5)

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取扱所</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とりあつかいしょ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>service point</gloss>

daijr (given as a reading for 神嘗祭, not 神嘗の祭)

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かんにえのまつり</reb>
+</r_ele>

g ng
神嘗の祭	No matches
神嘗祭	3676

Not bothering splitting out 神嘗の祭 (though I don't think it's wrong, just not common enough to be worth the bother)

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>神嘗の祭</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-<re_restr>神嘗祭</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かんにえのまつり</reb>
@@ -19 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>神嘗祭</re_restr>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&hanaf;</field>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to play hana cards</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
+<gloss>to play hanafuda</gloss>

Time to close it.

Reopen, but not for long.

This has been around too long. I'm aligning the POS with 2756750 and closing. I'll  reopen for a bit if anyone wants to tackle a split/merge.

@@ -39,0 +40,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Can you set up that split and the ボッコボコ merge? I find it hard with just a tablet.

daij

I think ぽこぽこ should be split out (and ぼっこぼこ brought back in). ぼこぼこ and ぽこぽこ only partially overlap, and the meaning is 
not identical. daijr: " ぼこぼこ 一 ① よりも、軽い感じを表す語。"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>burbling</gloss>
+<gloss>with a burble</gloss>

daijs 無い物強請り
g ng

無いものねだり	26478
無い物ねだり	19102
ない物ねだり	2205
無いもの強請り	1493 (adding this one + the one in daijs, ignoring the two bottom ones)
無い物強請り	697 (daijs)
ないもの強請り	344
ない物強請り	36
daijr
"無いものをむりに欲しがること。" ほしがる i.e. not necessarily "asking for" but just "wanting" so "pining" seems like a reasonable 
translation.
https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/2158/
https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/24826/
https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/1050/
("crying/asking for the moon" comes first in all three but "the grass is greener" appears as suggestions in all of them as well)
https://twitter.com/_L0UE_/status/1065595455294205952
"彼氏がいれば面倒臭い、
彼氏がいなければ寂しい。
嫉妬されれば喧嘩をして、
嫉妬されなければ不安になる。
お金があればたかられて、
お金がなければお腹が空く。
結局みんなないものねだり。"
This comic as well:
https://twitter.com/ima_no_numa_/status/1066214243802869760
https://twitter.com/flower_hrssh/status/1066212103273373698
"夏の声🌻🌴🎆

今は夏が恋しい

「ないものねだり」だな"

We don't have ねだり marked as vs. GG5/daij don't mark this as vs.

@@ -12,0 +13,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無いもの強請り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無い物強請り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +27,2 @@
+<gloss>pining for what one doesn't have</gloss>
+<gloss>thinking the grass is greener on the other side of the fence</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

gg5
ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無いものねだり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>無いものねだり</keb>
+<keb>ない物ねだり</keb>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>asking for the impossible</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>company store</gloss>
+<gloss>directly managed store (as opposed to a distributor)</gloss>

Yes, I'd overlooked that it's 飲んじゃった and 食べちゃった; not 飲んちゃった or 食べじゃった.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

飲んじゃう	40509	25.1%
飲んじゃって	30670	19.0%
飲んじゃった	90457	56.0%

It can't be meaningful to look at the ngrams for an entry like these - there will be gazillions of false hits, and the real thing missed. Three conjugations of a single -む verb gets over 150k in the ngrams - obviously じゃう should also get spec1 and should definitely not be hidden.

Closing.

ちゃう	26239074	97.4%
じゃう	703267	2.6%

Don't need spec1 on じゃう, in fact it could be [sk].
(The sentences indexed to this entry are using the "じゃう{ちゃう}" construction. I left it that way to distinguish it from the other ちゃう entry.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Not sure further note is needed.

Hard to prove how common it is with the ngrams 
but anybody who lives in Kansai will be 
constantly bombarded with this word, as will 
anybody turning on the TV to watch a variety 
show (considering how Kansai comedians/talents 
dominate that scene)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>poss. from ちがう</s_inf>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -11 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>no!</gloss>
+<gloss>no</gloss>
+<gloss>that's wrong</gloss>
+<gloss>it's not like that</gloss>

native kansai-ben informant (ksb rather than osb)

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<dial>&osb;</dial>
-<gloss>No!</gloss>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
+<gloss>no!</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>

Aligning

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ceremonial offering by the Emperor of newly-harvested rice to the deities</gloss>
+<gloss>ceremonial offering to the deities by the Emperor of newly-harvested rice</gloss>

Just a note:
wiki, brit, mypedia has にいなめさい first but daij both have their main entries under しんじょうさい
in the news,
https://www.sankei.com/life/news/181122/lif1811220039-n1.html
"天皇陛下は２３日、在位中最後の新嘗（にいなめ）祭に臨まれる。"
on Ise Jingu's website:
http://www.isejingu.or.jp/ritual/annual/kinen.html 
"にいなめさい"
in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDT8qpeLf4w
"にいなめさい"

Entry created

Yes.

I saw that there was no on-mim on ハハハ, あはは, えへへ and うふん (which you added yesterday) and assumed we didn't use it for interjections.
I'm happy for it to go back in but we probably need to amend quite a few other entries.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

What makes you say it isn't on-mim? Isn't "haha" an onomatopoeic representation of laughter?

That question mark was a typo.

Not on-mim?

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
-<gloss>teehee</gloss>
+<gloss>tee-hee</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: int
gg5

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>heh heh heh</gloss>

when in a sentence, えへへと
but of course, most often not used in a sentence

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>hand consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>
+<gloss>dealt hand consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>

光一	945124
ぴか一	24088
ピカイチ	302107
ピカ一	36458

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>ピカ一</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>光一</re_restr>
+<re_restr>ぴか一</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピカいち</reb>
+<re_restr>ピカ一</re_restr>
@@ -18,0 +28 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1895940">手役</xref>
@@ -20,2 +30 @@
-<gloss>pika-ichi</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">scoring hand consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>
+<gloss>hand consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>

need to decide on consistent translations for 役, 手役, 出来役
(scoring hand, yaku, meld, etc.)

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">scoring hand in hanafuda consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">scoring hand consisting of one 20-point card and six 1-point cards</gloss>

dupe.

I suggest splitting out どうだっていい.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうだっていい</reb>
@@ -17 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>whatever you do is OK</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>whatever</gloss>
+<gloss>whichever</gloss>
+<gloss>I don't care</gloss>
+</sense>

this conjugates, so splitting

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうでもよい</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Fork

I suggest splitting out どうだっていい.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうだっていい</reb>
@@ -17 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>whatever you do is OK</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>whatever</gloss>
+<gloss>whichever</gloss>
+<gloss>I don't care</gloss>
+</sense>

this conjugates, so splitting

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうでもよい</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

どうでも良い	413959
どうでもよい	125232
どうでもいい	3746691

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>どうでも良い</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +11,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>どうでもよい</reb>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see">どうでもよい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827562">どうでもよい</xref>

missing xrefs (really for the benefit of editors rather than users, so that we don't forget to edit both entries)

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2827562">どうでもよい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827562">どうでもよい・1</xref>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see">どうでもよい</xref>

I suggest splitting out どうだっていい.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうだっていい</reb>
@@ -17 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>whatever you do is OK</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>whatever</gloss>
+<gloss>whichever</gloss>
+<gloss>I don't care</gloss>
+</sense>

daij

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はは</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ははん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>Aha!</gloss>
+<gloss>aha!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ははあ</stagr>
+<stagr>はは</stagr>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>yes sir</gloss>

Entry created

OK, I see what you mean. The subject has to jump around to make it work, which makes it inconsistent with the other glosses, if nothing 
else.
"(now)'s not the time for _running around_"
vs
"_running around_ is not the word for (it)"

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>the word for</gloss>

Structurally it doesn't fit. Compare with the other glosses:
遊ぶどころじゃない - not the time for play.
どうかしたどころじゃないよ - not the word for something wrong (?)
That's why I replaced it with "level of".

OK

gg5: 
「どうかしたのかい」「どうかしたどころじゃないよ」　"Is something wrong?"―"'Wrong' isn't the word for it!"

It might not fit every use of the word, but it's an an adequate translation in some cases.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>the word for</gloss>

I try and avoid such long notes, but it's rather meañingless without that one.

If we go with [hist] for things that happened 25+ years ago, this, the Oklahoma bombing, etc. will get [hist]. Does that sound ok to 
other editors?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway (1995.3.20)</gloss>
+<gloss>sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway (March 20, 1995)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway (1995.03.20)</gloss>
+<gloss>sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway (1995.3.20)</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

I meant "not given as a definite source".

G n-grams:
笑う門には福来る	48580
笑う門には福来たる	41329

Only Wiktionary mentions 打開笑門福自來 and it's not given a definite source. I think it should be left out.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笑う門には福来たる</keb>
@@ -13,2 +16 @@
-<s_inf>from Chi: 打開笑門福自來</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="fig">laugh and grow fat</gloss>
+<gloss>laugh and grow fat</gloss>

I agree about translation vs transliteration, but the Chinese is worth showing.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>from Chi: 打開笑門福自來</s_inf>

Seems ok.

An attempt at the other sense.

@@ -17 +17,9 @@
-<gloss>to do something completely</gloss>
+<gloss>to do completely</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>
+<gloss>to do accidentally</gloss>
+<gloss>to do without meaning to</gloss>
+<gloss>to happen to do</gloss>

ちまう is tokyo dialect according to wiki and
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/dialect/1023/m0u/

I'm not sure about じまう - maybe it should be split out.

this and まう and しまう seem incomplete - they all　also have this second meaning from daijs "㋐その動作・行為が完了する、すっかりその状態に
なる意を表す。「早く食べて―・いなさい」「所帯染みて―・う」「あきれて―・う」
㋑そのつもりでないのに、ある事態が実現する意を表す。「負けて―・った」「まずいところを見られて―・った」"

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see">ちゃう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2013800">ちゃう</xref>

Entry created

OK, I'm going with Marcus' suggestion.

@@ -29,6 +29 @@
-<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
-<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>

I agree it doesn't look right having a list of species under one sense, and I'm not convinced it's necessary to mention them at all (except maybe one or two as examples).

I don't think we should have to do a note here. What I reacted to is that this is not how we usually do these entries. Each line has 
a completely separate gloss that's not compatible with the others. If we split each gloss into a separate sense, I think that would 
be closer to what we normally do, but I'm not really sure I think that's the best approach either. if we want to include all these 
latin names, shouldn't the first line be something like

hairy mite (in reference to a large number of species including Trombidiidae spp., Erythraeoidea spp., Trombiculidae spp., 
Tetranychidae spp., Cheyletidae spp.)

but my preference would be a much simpler

hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite)

or 

hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.)

OK, here is my suggestion.

@@ -29,2 +29,6 @@
-<gloss>red, hairy mite</gloss>
-<gloss>velvet mite</gloss>
+<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
+<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>

I think I prefer Rene's original. Perhaps we could keep his glosses and start with "catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites" or similar.

Aligning.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>an unspecified day of the month, used on diplomas, proclamations, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>unspecified day of the month (used to obscure the date a letter, invitation, etc. was written)</gloss>

https://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/comments/9yxm9e/what_does_it_mean_when_吉_is_used_in_a_date_like/

Not sure if actually common

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577870">吉日・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>an unspecified day of the month, used on diplomas, proclamations, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Daijr

Again, better to have the omikuji mention in the gloss, plus xref.
I wondered about きつ, but I see Koj has it for this meaning.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<s_inf>particularly at shrines in omikuji (fortune strips)</s_inf>
-<gloss>good fortune</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270440">御神籤・おみくじ</xref>
+<gloss>good fortune (esp. omikuji fortune-telling result)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>auspiciousness</gloss>

aligning with 青短

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>赤タン</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>赤たん</keb>
@@ -13,3 +18,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>赤タン</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<re_restr>赤たん</re_restr>
@@ -27,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418700">短冊・1</xref>
@@ -29 +34 @@
-<gloss>red 5-point card</gloss>
+<gloss>5-point card with a red tanzaku</gloss>
@@ -35 +40 @@
-<gloss>the three 5-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>the three 5-point cards with ribbons (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

sometimes written like this in rulebooks.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>赤冊</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>赤冊</re_restr>

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>red 5-point card (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>red 5-point card</gloss>
@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>the three 5-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>the three 5-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the five 20-point cards (high-scoring)</gloss>
+<gloss>the five 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>the five 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>the five 20-point cards (high-scoring)</gloss>

replacing "brights" "lights" with "20-point cards"

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<gloss>the five brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
-<gloss>the five light cards</gloss>
-<gloss>the five hikari cards</gloss>
+<gloss>the five 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826488">出来役</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>four 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>four 20-point cards (scoring combination)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>four 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>four 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

aligning all hanafuda meld entries

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<gloss>four brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
-<gloss>four lights</gloss>
-<gloss>four hikari</gloss>
+<gloss>four 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

Let's change all instances of "combination" to "meld"

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>four brights (high-scoring combination in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>four brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

depends on the ruleset, actually. also historically used in mekuri karuta where there are no "rain" cards

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>three non-rain 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>three 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

daij koj
(prob [poet]?)

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the Sun, the Moon and the stars</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>three non-rain 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>three non-rain 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826488">出来役</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other 20-point cards (scoring combination)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other 20-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

aligning hanafuda entries

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other 20-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the rain card and three other brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card and three other brights (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

Aligning with でありんす

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>var. of あります historically used by Edo prostitutes</s_inf>
+<s_inf>var. of あります used by Edo prostitutes</s_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>to exist</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">有る・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・2</xref>

@@ -9 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>variation of "arimasu" used by the prostitutes of the Yoshiwara red light district in the Edo period</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">有る・2</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>var. of あります historically used by Edo prostitutes</s_inf>
+<gloss>to have</gloss>

Entry created

A very fine point. I don't think a tag is that necessary.

"i don't think an [int] can be [on-mim].  it's the sound itself, not a word representing such a sound"
I think てへへ IS originally a written representative of a sound of laughter that doesn't actually sound exactly like てへへ. Either 
way, isn't it at minimum "mimetic" of a sound?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>ehehe</gloss>
+<gloss>ehehe (embarrassed laugh)</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">embarrassed laugh</gloss>

merged in 2740530.  also, i don't think an [int] can be [on-mim].  it's the sound itself, not a word representing such a sound

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>てへ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テヘ</reb>
@@ -12,1 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&int;</pos>

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1418700">短冊</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1418700">短冊・1</xref>

青短	3581
青丹	5347 (has different meanings, read あおに)
青冊	24 (I've seen this in older books, worth recording I think)
青たん	5750 ←
                       both these can refer to "bruise" also - separate entry. merge in here?
青タン	19639 ←

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>青タン</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>青たん</keb>
@@ -14,0 +21,8 @@
+<re_restr>青短</re_restr>
+<re_restr>青たん</re_restr>
+<re_restr>青丹</re_restr>
+<re_restr>青冊</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あおタン</reb>
+<re_restr>青タン</re_restr>
@@ -17,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418700">短冊</xref>
@@ -19 +34 @@
-<gloss>blue 5-point card</gloss>
+<gloss>5-point card with a blue tanzaku</gloss>
@@ -25 +40 @@
-<gloss>the three blue 5-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>scoring combination consisting of the three 5-point cards with blue tanzaku</gloss>

I've seen this in more than one book(I can 
dig them up, of course)

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>青冊</keb>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>blue 5-point card (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>blue 5-point card</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>the three blue 5-point cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>the three blue 5-point cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

Or [col]?

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

Presumably.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<stagr>モンペ</stagr>

daijs: "「モンスターペアレント」または「モンスターペイシェント」の略。"

Added sense.
Don't need language source on this entry.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">monster parent</lsource>
@@ -17,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2723950">モンスターペイシェント</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>unreasonably demanding patient</gloss>
+<gloss>nightmare patient</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

daijr, nikk, プログレッシブ和英中辞典
nikk: "ごまかし、気まずさ、恥じらい、いやらしさなどを含んで笑う声。"
could have an expl

OK

https://ameblo.jp/michaelgabrielraphael/entry-12155651509.html
https://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/40576?page=2
https://p-shirokuma.hatenadiary.com/entry/20060720/p3
G n-grams:
ボッコボコ	34585
ボッコボコに	23652
ボッコボコが	No matches
ボッコボコを	31

I don't think this is a noun or vs. It's almost always in the form ボッコボコにする (or される, etc.). In daijs's ぼこぼこ entry, this sense is 形動.
I've added a second sense. I see this usage quite a lot.

@@ -11,2 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +13,12 @@
-<s_inf>emphatic form of ぼこぼこ</s_inf>
-<gloss>viciously beating</gloss>
-<gloss>hitting and kicking repeatedly</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as ボッコボコにする, ボッコボコにされる, etc.; emphatic form of ぼこぼこ</s_inf>
+<gloss>severely beaten up</gloss>
+<gloss>repeatedly punched and kicked</gloss>
+<gloss>thoroughly defeated</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>attacked relentlessly (with words)</gloss>
+<gloss>fiercely criticised</gloss>
+<gloss>bombarded with verbal abuse</gloss>

This has been around too long. I'm aligning the POS with sense 4 of 1983930 and closing. I'll leave 1983930 open for a bit if anyone wants to tackle a split/merge.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

tough to say.  right now, it shouldn't be merged because the PoS is different, but there's no reference for the PoS

Are we sure this should be kept separate from the main ぼこぼこ entry?

daij

Added senses.

@@ -10 +10,4 @@
-<gloss>flaring up (fire)</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>with a roar (of flames)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a whoosh</gloss>
+<gloss>flaring up</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -20 +25,18 @@
-<gloss>being stupefied</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>in a daze</gloss>
+<gloss>absent-mindedly</gloss>
+<gloss>vacantly</gloss>
+<gloss>abstractedly</gloss>
+<gloss>blankly</gloss>
+<gloss>idly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011760">ぼうっと・2</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>dimly</gloss>
+<gloss>hazily</gloss>
+<gloss>faintly</gloss>
+<gloss>vaguely</gloss>
+<gloss>indistinctly</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1011760">ぼうっと・3</xref>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1011760">ぼうっと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011760">ぼうっと・1</xref>

大辞林

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011760">ぼうっと</xref>
+<gloss>being stupefied</gloss>
+</sense>

ルミナス, etc. too.

The "adv-to" is only used when you *add* a と to make an adverb. The ...っと cases are just "adv".

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

nikk

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>inoshikacho (type of hanafuda gambling game)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
-<gloss>the boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>the boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring meld)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring combination in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>the boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring meld in hanafuda)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the three boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring combination in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>the boar, deer and butterfly cards (high-scoring combination in hanafuda)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

eij example sentence
実用日本語表現辞典

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハハハ</reb>
+</r_ele>

GG5

Read in a kid’s book.
Note that はは、ははあ etc. have specific meanings (esp. 
surprise), so probably need at least 3 for the laughing sense 
in general.

http://hida-yamayuushi.com/en/region.html  (note the "Lump" and "Lib" cuts....)

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>misuji (cut of beef, from the shoulder/chuck)</gloss>
+<gloss>misuji (cut of beef, usu. from the chuck)</gloss>

https://xn--11xm61a.top/2234/

This could be phrased better but some explanation where about the cut is taken from would be helpful, I think.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>misuji (cut of beef)</gloss>
+<gloss>misuji (cut of beef, from the shoulder/chuck)</gloss>

Daijr
https://sg.entertainment.yahoo.com/news/omi-wagyu-different-cuts-marbled-beef-093525654.html
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1149901941

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ミスジ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミスジ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16,2 +17,8 @@
-<gloss>misuji (a cut of beef)</gloss>
-<gloss>beef samisen</gloss>
+<gloss>misuji (cut of beef)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1579450">三味線・しゃみせん</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>shamisen</gloss>
+<gloss>samisen</gloss>

http://sumiyakiya.com/menu_halal/
http://r.gnavi.co.jp/p825400/lang/en/menu/m-3
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ミスジ
http://www.matsusaka-projects.com/english/bbq.php

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

Aligning with my edit to どうでもいい. I still hope we'll be able to merge all these よい/いい entries back eventually.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>whatever you do is OK</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>whatever</gloss>
+<gloss>whichever</gloss>
+<gloss>I don't care</gloss>
+</sense>

splitting

Meant to delete it.

There's not really a clear consensus here but it's been almost 6 months now. I'm going to delete this based on arguments made by me, 
Robin, and Rene. I'll add it to the 事務所 entry but as I've said, I wouldn't be miffed if it isn't included at all.

reopen as a reminder

close and reopen. given the extent of the conversation, probably this is a matter for the mailing list

It might be the case that it's much more common in handwritten Japanese than online.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q118149731
"私は急いでメモしないといけないときに、一種の略字として
まだれ（广）の中に“Ｋ”や“Ｏ”を入れて「慶応」としたり、
... こういう表記で、他に便利なのはありませんか？
...
事務所は事ム所だな。務はみんなムにしちゃう。"
https://books.google.co.jp/books?
id=KlYNMV9Ot0MC&lpg=PA430&ots=RhPIs9dLWH&dq=%22'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&pg=PA430#v=onepage&q=%22
'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&f=false
"全く務の字が一寸むづかしい貸めに、軍なる片暇名でその務音を示し間に合せてみる" (1936)
(149 unique hits on google books for 事ム所)
If so, I think that strengthens the case to include it, but it's hard to look into of course.
In general, we have included some pretty obscure kanji forms in plenty of entries. As long as they're properly marked as 
iK or oK, I don't think it's that much of an issue. Dictionary developers can decide for themselves how prominently (or 
not) they want to display these.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<s_inf>used by itself, i.e. not ～思う etc.</s_inf>

Looking at this again, I'km not in love with the note. It's tagged as int, shouldn't that be enough?

Something like that works. I think it can be trimmed.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>used by itself, i.e. not ～思う etc.</s_inf>
@@ -16,5 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>usu. 何だと思う, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>what do you (think? say?, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>

This is probably not ideal but something like [note="when used by itself, i.e. not when followed by ～思う etc. as a subordinate 
clause"] might remove the need for sense 2?

Yes, entries like this one are tricky because I agree we should be careful not to screw things up for people using jmdict for text 
glossing (with tools like rikai-chan, etc.)
Sense 2 is tricky because really the "you" should be within the brackets too, probably (the subject could be a third person)
I'm not sure sense 1 is an "abbreviation" of sense 2, really. I mean you could argue that it's "何だと言った？" but I'm not convinced.
If there was an eloquent way to phrase a note on sense 1 to explain the phrase only has this meaning when it's not used as a sub 
clause (not sure of the terminology here)...