daij, meikyo

See comments on 大好き.
I added the "refined taste" sense in 2018 but it's archaic. I've replaced it with the "好色。色好み" sense, which is in all the kokugos, including meikyo.

@@ -15,3 +15,7 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1257240">嫌い・きらい・1</xref>
-<gloss>that one likes</gloss>
-<gloss>(one's) favourite</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1257240">嫌い・1</xref>
+<gloss>liking</gloss>
+<gloss>being fond of</gloss>
+<gloss>to one's liking</gloss>
+<gloss>to one's taste</gloss>
+<gloss>preferred</gloss>
+<gloss>favourite</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>that one is in love (with)</gloss>
-<gloss>that one is romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>liking (romantically)</gloss>
+<gloss>being in love with</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -34,3 +39,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>the way one likes</gloss>
-<gloss>(as) it suits one</gloss>
+<gloss>as one likes</gloss>
+<gloss>as it suits one</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +43 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -40,3 +45,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1373010">数寄</xref>
-<gloss>refined taste</gloss>
-<gloss>elegant pursuits</gloss>
+<gloss>lecherous</gloss>
+<gloss>lustful</gloss>
+<gloss>salacious</gloss>

Suggested sth similar for 大好き

@@ -16,4 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>liked</gloss>
-<gloss>well-liked</gloss>
-<gloss>favourite</gloss>
-<gloss>favorite</gloss>
+<gloss>that one likes</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) favourite</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>in love (with)</gloss>
-<gloss>loved</gloss>
-<gloss>romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>that one is in love (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>that one is romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>beloved</gloss>

daij, koj

@@ -39,0 +40,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1373010">数寄</xref>
+<gloss>refined taste</gloss>
+<gloss>elegant pursuits</gloss>
+</sense>

daij

I think "unfortunate" is sense 1.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>unfortunate (e.g. life)</gloss>
-<gloss>checkered</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>checkered (life, career, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>eventful</gloss>
+<gloss>dramatic</gloss>
+<gloss>full of ups and downs</gloss>

すき is a different word

@@ -17,3 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すき</reb>
-</r_ele>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1260620">顕在</xref>

daijs, gg5

Daijs has two senses. I think this is clearer.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>earthly world</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>ordinary world</gloss>
+<gloss>everyday life</gloss>
@@ -15 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>this life</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典,ルミナス

@@ -12,1 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>the workaday world</gloss>
+<gloss>this world</gloss>
+<gloss>secular society</gloss>
+<gloss>workaday world</gloss>
+<gloss>this life</gloss>

Could be improved: secular world;real world?

Agreed.

Normally I like to keep the alternative readings within the main entry, but these all really get in the way, and probably deserve an "arch" tag.

@@ -16,16 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すめらぎ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すめろぎ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すべらぎ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すめらき</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>

daij

We could also split out all these into their own arch entry

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22,9 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すべらぎ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すめらき</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daij, koj

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>同原</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>the same origin</gloss>
+<gloss>same origin</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haibutsu_kishaku
daij

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>排仏棄釈</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>anti-Buddhist movement at the beginning of the Meiji era</gloss>
+<gloss>abolish Buddhism, destroy Shākyamuni (slogan of anti-Buddhist movement at the beginning of the Meiji era)</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5, daij

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>expectation of something in return</gloss>
+<gloss>terms of exchange</gloss>
+<gloss>conditions for meeting a demand</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=交換条件

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>expectation of something in return</gloss>

Creating separate entry for いい reading.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>質のいい</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15,7 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>質の良い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たちのいい</reb>
-<re_restr>たちの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>質のいい</re_restr>

I've been holding off approving this until I can look at possible edits on the other 質が/質の entries. To make sure we're on the same page, I'll just summarise GG5's entries for 質/たち/しつ:
質/たち: (1) nature; disposition; temperament ... (2) nature; character;  a property ...  All examples use kana (たち)
質/しつ: (1) 〔品質･素質〕 quality  (2) 〔資質〕 a nature; a disposition; a temperament   All examples use kanji.
We immediately have a problem because the senses overlap to a degree. Anyway, looking at the others:
質の悪い;たちの悪い;タチの悪い  nasty; poor (quality); mean; vicious  <- needs to have the "poor (quality)" removed. GG5 & Eijiro confirm this.
質の悪い/しつのわるい - no such entry. Eijiro, etc, examples. I've proposed an entry.
質の高い しつのたかい 	high quality  <-- seems fine.
たちの高い (1720). Can't see it being used. I suspect we're seeing counts from XXたちの高いZZ.
質が悪い たちがわるい 	nasty; vicious; wicked; ill-natured; poor quality  <- needs the "poor quality" moved into a しつがわるい entry. I've proposed that.
質が悪い  しつがわるい no entry. Robin suggested one last year. I've proposed it now.
質が良い/質がいい  たちが... good (quality) <- the meanings need flipping to "good-natured; of good character" and equivalent しつが... entries created. I'll do that.
I'll leave this open a bit long if anyone wants to comment.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>質の良い</keb>
+<keb>たちの良い</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>たちの良い</keb>
+<keb>質の良い</keb>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>たちの良い</re_restr>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちの良い</re_restr>

Indeed. We don't even have a 質(しつ)のよい entry (which is odd given that it's far more common than たちのよい).
Also, should the いい and よい forms be separate entries? There was a discussion about this not too long and I can't remember what we settled on. I note that the いい reading was removed from the 質が良い entry in 2015.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -27 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>good (quality)</gloss>
+<gloss>good-natured</gloss>
+<gloss>of good character</gloss>

This is a bit of a mess, as it's got the two meanings of 質 mixed up. GG5 says たちの良い is "good-natured" and 質(しつ)のよい is "good-quality", in line with the たち/しつ split for 質. All the 質の/質が entres need checking.

gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>hold</gloss>
+<gloss>cargo hold (of an aircraft, ship, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cargo bay</gloss>

daij, gg5

@@ -9 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>punch</gloss>
+<gloss>punch (drink)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>punch (tool)</gloss>

Entry created

OK, I'm going with Marcus' suggestion.

@@ -29,6 +29 @@
-<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
-<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>

I agree it doesn't look right having a list of species under one sense, and I'm not convinced it's necessary to mention them at all (except maybe one or two as examples).

I don't think we should have to do a note here. What I reacted to is that this is not how we usually do these entries. Each line has 
a completely separate gloss that's not compatible with the others. If we split each gloss into a separate sense, I think that would 
be closer to what we normally do, but I'm not really sure I think that's the best approach either. if we want to include all these 
latin names, shouldn't the first line be something like

hairy mite (in reference to a large number of species including Trombidiidae spp., Erythraeoidea spp., Trombiculidae spp., 
Tetranychidae spp., Cheyletidae spp.)

but my preference would be a much simpler

hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite)

or 

hairy mite (esp. red velvet mite, Trombidiidae spp.)

OK, here is my suggestion.

@@ -29,2 +29,6 @@
-<gloss>red, hairy mite</gloss>
-<gloss>velvet mite</gloss>
+<s_inf>catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites</s_inf>
+<gloss>velvet mite (Trombidiidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>erythaeid mite (Erythraeoidea spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>harvest mite (Trombiculidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>spider mite (Tetranychidae spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheyletid mite (Cheyletidae spp.)</gloss>

I think I prefer Rene's original. Perhaps we could keep his glosses and start with "catch-all term for hairy (preferably red) mites" or similar.

性質が悪い	29014	10.6%
たちが悪い	63549	23.3%
タチが悪い	69714	25.5%
質が悪い	110991	40.6%

See 1320650

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>性質が悪い</keb>

I think 質が悪い is more likely to be しつがわるい.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>質が悪い</keb>
+<keb>たちが悪い</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>たちが悪い</keb>
+<keb>質が悪い</keb>

たちが悪い	63549	26.0%
タチが悪い	69714	28.5%
質が悪い	110991	45.4%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>たちが悪い</keb>
+<keb>質が悪い</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>質が悪い</keb>
+<keb>たちが悪い</keb>

simplify

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちが悪い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>質が悪い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タチがわるい</reb>
-<re_restr>タチが悪い</re_restr>

gg5

@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2259560">質が良い</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="2259560">質が良い</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2259550">質の悪い</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2259550">質の悪い</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2259560">たちが良い</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2259560">たちが良い</xref>
+<gloss>of bad character</gloss>
+<gloss>ill-natured</gloss>
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>ill-natured</gloss>
+<gloss>malignant</gloss>

Simplifying restrictions and adding 性質の悪い (to align with the たちが悪い entry)

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>性質の悪い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,6 +17,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちの悪い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>質の悪い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タチのわるい</reb>
-<re_restr>タチの悪い</re_restr>

Aligning.

@@ -23,3 +23,6 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1891510">質の良い</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2259540">質が悪い</xref>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1891510">たちの良い</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2259540">たちが悪い</xref>
+<gloss>of bad character</gloss>
+<gloss>ill-natured</gloss>
@@ -27 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>mean</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>wicked</gloss>
+<gloss>malignant</gloss>

See discussion on 1891510. "poor (quality)" really belongs in a しつのわるい entry.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>質の悪い</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>質の悪い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>たちの悪い</re_restr>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちの悪い</re_restr>
@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>poor (quality)</gloss>

G n-grams:
たちの悪い風邪	1873
タチの悪い風邪	1186
たちの悪い	41259
タチの悪い	38318
質の悪い	50435
Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タチの悪い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>質の悪い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>たちの悪い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タチのわるい</reb>
+<re_restr>タチの悪い</re_restr>
@@ -18,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>mean</gloss>
+<gloss>vicious</gloss>

たちがいい	10894
タチがいい	295
たちが良い	4912
質がいい	        26691
質が良い	        26632
質がよい	        5471

I think most of the 質〜 counts are しつ.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>質がいい</keb>
+<keb>たちが良い</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>質がよい</keb>
+<keb>質がいい</keb>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<keb>たちが良い</keb>
+<keb>質がよい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
@@ -19,2 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
@@ -26 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
@@ -31,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

質がいい	26691
たちがいい	10894
たちが良い	4912
質が良い	26632
質がよい	5471
たちがよい	962

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>たちが良い</keb>
+<keb>質がいい</keb>
@@ -12,0 +13,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たちが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たちがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>質がいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +24,3 @@
+<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>質がよい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>たちが良い</re_restr>
@@ -18 +30 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Oops. This is よい, not いい.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

Aligning.
Not uk.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2259540">たちが悪い</xref>

gg5
寺受け the "temple guarantee"; a system under which a Buddhist temple certified that a person was affiliated with it.
寺請け状　the certificate issued by a Buddhist temple to show that a person was affiliated with it.

Entry created

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>punch (i.e. fruit punch)</gloss>
+<gloss>punch (drink)</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631560">ポン酢・ポンず・1</xref>

@@ -9,1 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1631560">ポン酢</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631560">ポン酢・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631560">ポン酢・1</xref>

Entry created

I don't think this can be considered an adverb.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

GG5 (in examples)

http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/好きな時に　　
http://www.manythings.org/ejs/whenever.html　　
http://v-english.jp/eikaiwa/fmenglish/?m=20110512

Similar to 好きなように

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

See discussion on 1891510.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>good (quality)</gloss>
+<gloss>good-natured</gloss>
+<gloss>of good character</gloss>

Splitting.

Agreed. I don't think we need this.

目の付け所	58279
目の付け所がいい	3845
目の付けどころがいい	400
目の付け所がよい	407
目の付けどころがよい	21
目の付け所が良い	1262
目の付けどころが良い	207

I think that with the recent extensions to the glosses for the 目の付け所 etc. entry this extended expression is not really needed. I think it should be rejected. I'll leave this here for a couple of days in case anyone want to take a different line.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/目の付け所
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/目の付けどころ

https://www.tedukurikotoba.com/entry/1842.html

Daijr: 天皇を敬って呼ぶ語.

I think this is fine; both "hum" and "arch".

daij

Arch is a guess

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>to put somebody down (esp. in an underhanded way) in order to appear superior</gloss>
-<gloss>to put somebody in their place</gloss>
+<gloss>to assert dominance</gloss>

Not sure that マウント alone has that meaning. No ref has it.

g ng
マウントを取る	607
マウントをとる	230
6 hits past hour on twitter (did a search for "マウントを" and only counted とる/取る and their conjugations)

see マウンティング. マウント should probably be split similarly

The dollar sign is redundant if we're saying US_D_.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>unicorn (privately held startup company valued at over USD $1 billion)</gloss>
+<gloss>unicorn (privately held startup company valued at over US$1 billion)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>unicorn (privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion)</gloss>
+<gloss>unicorn (privately held startup company valued at over USD $1 billion)</gloss>

daijs, asahikeyword, chiezo, wiki

Daijr, GG5.

Splitting these alternative old versions from the main 天皇/てんのう entry. See 1582030 for discussion.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2837104">質が悪い・しつがわるい</xref>

Eijiro, 研究社ビジネス英和辞典, RP

See discussion on 1891510.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2837105">質が良い</xref>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837103">質の悪い・しつのわるい</xref>

質が悪い	110991
質がわるい	679
しつが悪い	< 20

See 1891510 for discussion.

Yes, I think this was an accident, Thanks.

Stumbled on this and one other entry.  いい seems to be generally adj-ix.

I see a comment "adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.", but nothing actually changed.  Probably just an accident here.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

質がいい	26691
しつがいい	40
質が良い	26632
質がよい	5471
しつがよい	20

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>質がいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,5 @@
+<reb>しつがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>質がいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +20,2 @@
+<re_restr>質が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>質がよい</re_restr>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2837104">質が悪い</xref>

質が良い	26632
質がよい	5471
Several Tanaka sentences

See discussion on 1891510.

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

質がいい	26691
しつがいい	40
Eijiro, Tanaka sentence

See discussion on 1891510.

GG5: どうせだから今全部やってしまいしましょう． We might as well do them all while we're about it.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>why not use this occasion to ...</gloss>

https://kiwi-english.net/10377

http://lang-8.com/42509/journals/294661

「それで淳行ちゃん。何で悩んでるわけ？　ネタ？　締め切り？」
「え？」
「私は悩んでます、なぁんて顔してるわよ？」
「仕事じゃないんだよ。実は、クラブのことで、ちょっと……」
どうせだからと、僕は一通りねえさんに話した。

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2837105">質が良い</xref>

Eijiro, Tanaka sentences
質の良い	161530
質のよい	46288
しつのよい	58

See 1891510.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Eijiro, 
質のいい	52561
しつのいい	41

See 1891510.

ラップをかける	3193
ラップを掛ける	1794
ラップを懸ける	< 20

Standard use of 掛ける, but not the first sense and maybe not that obvious.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ラップを掛ける</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to cover (food) with plastic wrap</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1207610">掛ける・かける・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to cover with plastic wrap (e.g. food)</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=ラップをかける

Daijr

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/鉄馬-576316

https://www.google.com/search?q=鉄馬&source=lnms&tbm=isch

The dictionary does not list motorcycle as a meaning, but I was told that motorcycles are also called 鉄馬 by Japanese people. The google search seems to validate that is in common usage.

Daijr, Koj

Just putting sense 1 from 始める - not sure the others apply.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>創む</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>(see 始める)</gloss>
-<gloss>(see をはじめ（として）)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1307550">始める・はじめる・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to start</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin</gloss>
+<gloss>to commence</gloss>
+<gloss>to initiate</gloss>
+<gloss>to originate</gloss>

https://kobun.weblio.jp/content/始む