@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>household member (incl. servant)</gloss>
+<gloss>household member (incl. servants)</gloss>

Yes, that's better.

I think that's one of Kojien's typical old-fashioned meanings, and it's probably lost that 
meaning in modern Japanese. Maybe mention it in the context of someone in the household.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>servant</gloss>
+<gloss>household member (incl. servant)</gloss>

koj: 家の内のもの。妻子眷属。特に、妻あるいは召使い。
daijr: 同じ家で一緒に生活している人。家族。

That does appear to be the case but I note that koj includes 召使い (servant) in its definition. I think it's worth adding as a gloss. The meaning isn't restricted to family members.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>servant</gloss>

https://mobile.twitter.com/henyome/status/1254940894148476928

As discussed in the Twitter thread, I think someone was mixing up the かじん and けにん meanings of 家人

gg5, prog

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>helmet (of armor, armour)</gloss>
+<gloss>helmet (of a warrior)</gloss>

Looking at the Google Search results, everything seems to be for a "仮面ライダーカブト", i.e. a fictional super hero character. A TV 
show with the same name was aired starting in 2006 according to wiki, so that probably explains the high ngram numbers (which are 
from 2007)

カブト	614826
かぶと	185625

The katakana version seems to be mostly used in manga/anime, and it's in some product names. Worth recording.

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カブト</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

gg5, prog

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>helmet (of armor, armour)</gloss>
+<gloss>helmet (of a warrior)</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -22,2 +22,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1249900">兄・あに</xref>
-<gloss>brother-in-law (older)</gloss>
+<gloss>brother-in-law (spouse's older brother or older sister's husband)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

A bit complex to put in a gloss. Rene's comment can be seen.

may need to be reworded.  i'm not sure how it works, but i think the brother is not necessarily older than oneself. one's wife's elder brother or one's elder sister's husband, for example, is not necessarily older than that person

gg5, daij

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>sister-in-law (older)</gloss>
+<gloss>sister-in-law (spouse's older sister or older brother's wife)</gloss>
@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1307630">姉・あね</xref>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>non blood related older sister</gloss>
+<gloss>non-blood-related older sister</gloss>

血縁関係はないが、姉妹の約束を交わして姉としている人。 
https://kotobank.jp/word/義姉-473470

less obscure and more casual, I probably went through a hundred+ visual novel character entries with 義妹 or 義姉 while fixing some tags on vndb and none used 継妹 or 継姉 and most weren't in-laws and were either step/adopted or somehow non blood related.
But I get if you want to label it obscure to differentiate from real life and anime usage, though they are both correct.

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<gloss>sister-in-law (older)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>sister-in-law (elder)</gloss>
-<gloss>stepsister (elder)</gloss>
+<gloss>older stepsister</gloss>
+<gloss>older adopted sister</gloss>
+<gloss>non blood related older sister</gloss>

OK, reverting.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>younger sister-in-law</gloss>
+<gloss>sister-in-law (spouse's younger sister or younger brother's wife)</gloss>

daijs:  義理の妹。夫または妻の妹、弟の妻など。
https://www.mwed.jp/articles/2228/
"年上の義妹ってやりづらい…呼び方や距離感など"彼女"と上手く付き合っていくコツ"

I don't think this works. Your 義妹 can be older than you.

I guess it's OK but you have to ask "younger than whom?" The person speaking/writing? Or the brother/sister?

isn't  (spouse's younger sister or younger brother's wife) needlessly wordy?

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>sister-in-law (spouse's younger sister or younger brother's wife)</gloss>
+<gloss>younger sister-in-law</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

顕在	362629	  
顕在化	293749	  
顕在化する	123721	  
顕在化して	46313	  
顕在化した	30403	  
顕在意識	33060

This is almost always part of 顕在化, which GG5 and 中辞典 use for examples.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1617900">顕在化</xref>

daij

This is a noun. It shouldn't have adjective glosses.

@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>actual (as opposed to hidden or obscured)</gloss>
-<gloss>obvious</gloss>
-<gloss>clear</gloss>
-<gloss>manifest</gloss>
-<gloss>explicit</gloss>
-<gloss>overt</gloss>
-<gloss>apparent</gloss>
-<gloss>evident</gloss>
-<gloss>actualized</gloss>
-<gloss>actualised</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1391310">潜在</xref>
+<gloss>being actual (as opposed to hidden or latent)</gloss>
+<gloss>being apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>being obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>being tangible</gloss>
+<gloss>being revealed</gloss>

daijr daijs
http://eow.alc.co.jp/顕在/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>clear</gloss>
+<gloss>manifest</gloss>
+<gloss>explicit</gloss>
+<gloss>overt</gloss>
+<gloss>apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>evident</gloss>

rejecting this forked branch

it seems have to enlighten on this matter. there are some rule on this but right off the top of my head, is Kyodo and NHK rule. both is pablished and every sitizen concern kanji rule easily get its hands on. if you refer to kanji rule you should consult this two.
finaly 舎 is on the list of joyokanjihyo, so don't need to change to hiragana.

「記者ハンドブック（新聞用字用語集）」。これは、主に新聞における記事の書き方や用語、漢字の使い分けといったルールを定めた冊子です。共同通信社が発行しておりますが、社会一般の文章表記にも使用されることを想定し、なんと一般向けにも販売しているのです。

http://webwriter-method.com/writer-handbook/
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/johokanri/60/2/60_69/_html/-char/ja/

NHKが独自に使うことを決めた漢字と音訓
https://www.nhk-book.co.jp/detail/000000112992011.html

常用漢字一覧
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/常用漢字一覧

That's very possible but I think we have to draw the line somewhere. Any kanji can be substituted with kana in order to make it easier to read for children.
Unless the form is especially common or the kanji is non-jouyou, I don't think it's worth recording.

i haven't looked it up, but perhaps it's possible that 校しゃ is written that way for children?

i'm not convinced we need to record every such variant, so i'm quite fine omitting this but i think historical precedent would probably let it in

G n-grams:
校舎	1415287
校しゃ	327

Perhaps he's referring to 校しゃ. It's really uncommon and 舎 is a 常用漢字 so I don't think we need it.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>校しゃ</keb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

HiddenForm 校しゃ

comment from huixing on a forked branch

it seems have to enlighten on this matter. there are some rule on this but right off the top of my head, is Kyodo and NHK rule. both is pablished and every sitizen concern kanji rule easily get its hands on. if you refer to kanji rule you should consult this two.
finaly 舎 is on the list of joyokanjihyo, so don't need to change to hiragana.

「記者ハンドブック（新聞用字用語集）」。これは、主に新聞における記事の書き方や用語、漢字の使い分けといったルールを定めた冊子です。共同通信社が発行しておりますが、社会一般の文章表記にも使用されることを想定し、なんと一般向けにも販売しているのです。

http://webwriter-method.com/writer-handbook/
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/johokanri/60/2/60_69/_html/-char/ja/

NHKが独自に使うことを決めた漢字と音訓
https://www.nhk-book.co.jp/detail/000000112992011.html

常用漢字一覧
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/常用漢字一覧

i might go the other way on this one and lean toward not keeping it, but it doesn't do any harm to keep.  we don't have a joyo kanji standard of keeping/excluding, although we could perhaps implement one

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>校しゃ</keb>

https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/隼人の校しゃ
http://pixiv.navirank.com/tag/隼人の校しゃ/2012/02/
https://deskgram.net/explore/tags/隼人の校しゃ

The main WWW usage of that surface form appears to be in "隼人の校しゃ", and is heavily manga related.
I've also found it in some kids' writing which seems to back up Rene's comment.
We don't really have an agreed threshold for accepting/rejecting odd-ball surface forms. 327 as an n-gram count would be fine if 校舎 wasn't all that common itself, but in fact it's very common so 校しゃ is relatively close to being noise.
I guess on balance, given the manga context of its use, I'd keep it.

GG5, etc.

I'll assume this is a typo.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>factor worker</gloss>
+<gloss>factory worker</gloss>

daij

Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1277980">工員</xref>
@@ -13 +14,7 @@
-<gloss>(factory) worker</gloss>
+<gloss>factor worker</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1357550">職人</xref>
+<gloss>craftsman</gloss>
+<gloss>artisan</gloss>

Yes, the modern meaning of "mechanic" doesn't quite fit.

daij, gg5

I don't think "mechanic" is right.
Not adj-no.

@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>craftsman</gloss>
+<gloss>artisan</gloss>
+<gloss>tradesman</gloss>
@@ -20,3 +22 @@
-<gloss>mechanic</gloss>
-<gloss>artisan</gloss>
-<gloss>craftsman</gloss>
+<gloss>workman</gloss>

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Needs fullwidth comma as one unit.

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<s_inf>often as. どうして, どうして</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often as どうして、どうして</s_inf>

Re-tagged sentences. Often difficult to divide the "how" and "why". "How come ..." and "Why ..." are often synonyms.

gg5, koj, etc.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>why?</gloss>
-<gloss>for what reason</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>by what means</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>why</gloss>
+<gloss>for what reason</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +28,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>cannot possibly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>often as. どうして, どうして</s_inf>
+<gloss>no way</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 背丈　　 │ 229,756 │
│ 脊丈　　 │      89 │ - add, rK (koj, gendai reikai)
│ せたけ　 │   1,935 │
│ せいたけ │      75 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脊丈</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, koj

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せいたけ</reb>
+</r_ele>

meikyo (only 1 sense)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

-> noun glosses

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>stringency (financial)</gloss>
-<gloss>(monetary) tightness</gloss>
+<gloss>tightness (of money, financial conditions, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>pressure</gloss>
+<gloss>stringency</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>impending (dangers)</gloss>
-<gloss>pressing (crisis)</gloss>
+<gloss>being strained (of a situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>being tense</gloss>
+<gloss>being pressing</gloss>
+<gloss>being tough</gloss>

google ngrams

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひっ迫</keb>

gg5, 中辞典

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>being actualised</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming tangible</gloss>
+<gloss>surfacing</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

I think "mechanic" is too specific.
Don't need x-ref.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1715810">見習工</xref>
-<gloss>skilled workman</gloss>
-<gloss>master mechanic</gloss>
+<gloss>skilled worker</gloss>
+<gloss>skilled labour</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1715810">見習工</xref>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>having a medical exam</gloss>
+<gloss>having a medical examination</gloss>

http://t-press.jp/p639/

Used in tennis as well.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>mixing of pitches</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>combination of (varied) pitches, serves, etc.</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 足軽　　 │ 70,177 │ 97.3% │
│ あしがる │  1,939 │  2.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

gg5, daijr

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>common foot soldier</gloss>
+<gloss>common foot soldier (feudal Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>samurai of the lowest rank</gloss>

koj, daij

@@ -11,2 +11,13 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>expression of surprise</gloss>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>never</gloss>
+<gloss>by no means</gloss>
+<gloss>not in the least</gloss>
+<gloss>in no way</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>why</gloss>
+<gloss>what for</gloss>

Entry created

足軽大将	2479
あしがるだいしょう	No matches <- kokugos
あしがるたいしょう	41 <- jawiki

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あしがるだいしょう</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>(something) pickled in</gloss>
+<gloss>pickled in (something)</gloss>

OK

daijs

This is how daijs splits the senses.

@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>relying too much on (e.g. medication)</gloss>
-<gloss>being badly influenced by</gloss>
-<gloss>being addicted to</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2625200">ぬか漬け</xref>
+<gloss>(something) pickled in</gloss>
+<gloss>preserved in</gloss>
+<gloss>dipped in</gloss>
@@ -22,6 +23,6 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1597520">茶漬け・ちゃづけ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1167060">一夜漬け・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2816210">二度づけ・にどづけ</xref>
-<gloss>immersed in</gloss>
-<gloss>dipped in</gloss>
-<gloss>intensely involved in</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2682660">薬漬け</xref>
+<gloss>overreliance on (e.g. medication)</gloss>
+<gloss>excessive use of</gloss>
+<gloss>addiction to</gloss>
+<gloss>immersion in</gloss>
+<gloss>intense involvement in</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス, etc.

ルミナス splits 一夜漬け into its own sense. I feel it's part of the "immersion" sense.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>relying too much on (e.g. medication)</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +20,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1597520">茶漬け・ちゃづけ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1167060">一夜漬け・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2816210">二度づけ・にどづけ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2816210">二度づけ・にどづけ</xref>
+<gloss>immersed in</gloss>
+<gloss>dipped in</gloss>
+<gloss>intensely involved in</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

gg5
sense 1:
"チャットルームで知り合った人をパブで探したが、それっぽい人はいなかった"
sense 2:
"それっぽく英語を発音する方法"
"10分でそれっぽい絵を描く方法"

I'm seeing two senses here.

@@ -10,3 +10,10 @@
-<gloss>like that</gloss>
-<gloss>looks real</gloss>
-<gloss>seems authentic</gloss>
+<gloss>(something) like that</gloss>
+<gloss>that sort of</gloss>
+<gloss>resembling</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>seemingly authentic</gloss>
+<gloss>genuine-looking</gloss>
+<gloss>realistic</gloss>
+<gloss>convincing</gloss>

(in jitsuyo)

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

Entry created

daij, gg5

Aligning.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2122340">装う・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -15 +17 @@
-<gloss>to prepare</gloss>
+<gloss>to dish out</gloss>

daijs nikk

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>装る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-
8&p=%E3%82%88%E3%81%9D%E3%82%8B&dtype=0&dname=0na&stype=0&page
num=1&index=19002300

Hi, Jim Breen!

Still needs context.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>binding period</gloss>
+<gloss>binding period (e.g. phone or broadband contract)</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>minimum contract term</gloss>

used for broadband etc. as well so should probably be more general. (maybe "binding period" should just be added to sense 1)
https://icip.info/hikarikaisen-sibarinasi/

@@ -21,3 +21 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<s_inf>usu. as 2年縛り or 4年縛り</s_inf>
-<gloss>automatically-renewing smartphone contract (with limited cancellation window and high early cancellation fees)</gloss>
+<gloss>binding period</gloss>

I did wonder about "col", so I'll add it now. I think the gloss carries a rather negative feel.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

should perhaps be [col] or [sl] then.  is there a negative connotation to this that is not being captured here or do mobile companies use the term as well?

Well, the additional sense for 縛り has been approved, so this can go.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/縛り_(携帯電話)

I've come around to Robin's position on this one, and proposed an extra sense to the 縛り entry. I think it will work OK.

https://www.hokkaido-np.co.jp/article/237467
"携帯「縛り」に規制を　新規会社が要望、総務省特別委で"

How about using the same gloss but without "2-year"? I would maybe change it to "form of automatically-renewing mobile phone contract with a limited cancellation window and high early cancellation fees".
We could add a note like "usu. as 2年縛り or 4年縛り".
Given that it's not always in the form "2年縛り", I think this is a better approach.

I don't see how anything meaningful can be added to 縛り which would help someone decode ２年縛り satisfactorily. It's really a very elliptical term.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/縛り_(携帯電話)

Can't we just add a sense to 縛り? This looks like a pretty odd entry to me. There's also 4年縛り.

目の付け所が違う	6400
目の付けどころが違う	671
目の付け所	58279
目の付けどころ	7733

I tend to lean towards expressions which add something to the dictionary, but in this case I can't really see that entries which add が違う when we already have 目の付け所 entries achieve anything much. I think it can be rejected.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/目の付け所
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/目の付けどころ

Koj, Daijr. Koj says: "サは神稲の意"
さ庭	2691

No relation to 狭庭. Feel free to amend.

sankoku, obunsha

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, koj

GG5

daij, jwiki

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<gloss xml:lang="mas">Tameharu</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>Tameharu</gloss>

https://mnamae.jp/p/b_70ba6674.html?ln=
http://kakijun.com/c/70ba6674.html