I don't think エヌジ is right. My refs only have エヌジー.
Sense 1 is a noun in daijs.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>エヌジ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16,4 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
@@ -23,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・ジー</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5, and kokugo (Daijr/s, Shinmeikai) to confirm

Seems to be able to refer to the performance itself or the footage.

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>blooper (deleted scene)</gloss>
+<gloss>outtake</gloss>
+<gloss>blooper</gloss>
+<gloss>retake</gloss>

Agree

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>power</gloss>

I don't think we should include "power" in that sense if we're tagging it as a physics term. They're different concepts. GG5 and prog only have "energy".
Adding "エネルギー資源" sense (daijs and koj).

@@ -29,0 +30,7 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1962130">エネルギー資源</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>energy source</gloss>
+<gloss>energy resource</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>power</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>energy</gloss>

X-ref not necessary in this direction.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1029350">エナジー</xref>

wiki redir
hatena "「ビッグバン」の誤表記"
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/�ӥå��Х�
g ng

宇宙大爆発	194
ビッグバン	202284
ビックバン	39290

Same as バック for バッグ, ベット for ベッド, etc.
Removing xdir

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1171390">宇宙大爆発・うちゅうだいばくはつ</xref>

http://www17.plala.or.jp/utyuu-nazo/bigban2.html

saw in a text I was reading, most Google hits seem to be about a band named "big bang" or various commercial ventures

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ビックバン</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ビッグ・バン</reb>

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1171390">宇宙大爆発・うちゅうだいばくはつ</xref>
+<field>&astron;</field>
+<field>&fin;</field>

daij, koj

This is the only sense in the kokugos.
I don't think sense 2 is an abbreviation.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one breath</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -16,2 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1161740">一気に飲む</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>shouted repeatedly as a party cheer</s_inf>
+<s_inf>chanted repeatedly as a party cheer</s_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>shouted repeatedly as a party cheer</s_inf>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>drink! (said repeatedly as a party cheer)</gloss>
+<gloss>drink!</gloss>

G n-grams:

一息　 1,467,841 91.4%
ひと息   138,623  8.6%

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひと息</keb>
@@ -33 +36 @@
-<s_inf>as 一息に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as 〜に</s_inf>

Of the four Tatoeba sentences, 3 are for sense 5. That sense ranks low in the references too.

gg5, daijr

Split sense 1.
I don't think any of the senses are adj-no.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>pause</gloss>
-<gloss>rest</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +22 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>one go (i.e. in a short time)</gloss>
+<gloss>time of one breath</gloss>
@@ -30 +26,13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>pause</gloss>
+<gloss>break</gloss>
+<gloss>rest</gloss>
+<gloss>breather</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 一息に</s_inf>
+<gloss>(doing in) one go</gloss>
+<gloss>doing without stopping</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +40 @@
+<gloss>a little more effort</gloss>

G n-grams 1467841

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5, prog

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>existing</gloss>
+<gloss>accomplished</gloss>
+<gloss>accepted</gloss>
@@ -21 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>existing</gloss>

G n-grams:
既成の事実	2394
既成事実	        66284

We already have 既成事実. I don't think we need this as well.

gg5, prog

Probably not.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>compound</gloss>
+<gloss>precincts</gloss>

Removed adj gloss. Should this really be adj-no?

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>in-house</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 最先端　　　 │ 2,203,728 │ 99.9% │
│ 最尖端　　　 │     1,492 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ さいせんたん │     1,155 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最先端

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>state of the art</gloss>

OK

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>children and younger brothers</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">children and younger brothers</gloss>

"children and younger brothers" is a literal translation but it looks a bit odd alongside the other glosses (The JEs just translate it as "children"/"sons"). Should it have a [lit] tag?

gg5, prog
daijr: "子供や弟。転じて，年若い人。年少者。"

@@ -16 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>young(er) people</gloss>
+<gloss>children</gloss>
+<gloss>sons</gloss>
+<gloss>children and younger brothers</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>young people</gloss>

４ （斎う）身を慎み、けがれを避けて神を祭る。
「祝部(はふり)らが―・ふ社のもみち葉も標縄(しめなは)越えて散るといふものを」〈万・二三〇九〉
５ （斎う）神の力を借りて守る。

the way that i read daijs is the other way around.  (i.e., 祝う applies to all senses except 4&5, whereas 斎う applies to all senses)

koj has these headwords merged together (斎う leads) with no restrictions/comments.  (however, it does have restrictions in its entry for いわい 【斎・祝】)

we have いわい entries merged without restriction, so i'd say we can leave this one be at least for now

gg5, daij

Added senses.
I don't think 斎う belongs here. In daijr it's a separate entry (with different definitions). In daijs it only applies to archaic senses we don't have here. Take it out?

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to celebrate</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to celebrate</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to present (a gift) in celebration</gloss>
+<gloss>to drink in celebration</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to wish for (a happy future, good fortune, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pray for</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs, nikk

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>斎う</keb>

GG5 has three senses, but they seem similar to me.

daij, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -16,2 +16,8 @@
-<gloss>tricks</gloss>
-<gloss>artfulness</gloss>
+<gloss>intricate workmanship</gloss>
+<gloss>delicate handiwork</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cheap trick</gloss>
+<gloss>petty trick</gloss>
+<gloss>obvious stratagem</gloss>

Not at all.

Surely not needed?

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>

GG5, etc.

Most refs avoid saying it's small.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>library (usu. single-room)</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>single-room library</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>library room</gloss>
+<gloss>small library</gloss>
+<gloss>single-room library</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't think "inflation" is right. Not in the JEs.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>inflation</gloss>
-<gloss>appreciation (economic)</gloss>
+<gloss>appreciation</gloss>
+<gloss>advance</gloss>

GG5, etc. too.

大辞泉 大辞林
http://eow.alc.co.jp/騰貴/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -15,1 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>rise</gloss>
+<gloss>rise (in price or value)</gloss>
+<gloss>inflation</gloss>
+<gloss>appreciation (economic)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

Not a 形容動詞.
Two senses in the kokugos.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -17 +16,9 @@
-<gloss>poor ability</gloss>
+<gloss>little power</gloss>
+<gloss>little influence</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>(one's) poor ability</gloss>
+<gloss>limited ability</gloss>
+<gloss>what little one can do</gloss>

Daijr

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>internal medicine (in Chinese medicinal practice), synonym 内科, antonym 外科</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457830">内科・ないか・1</xref>
+<gloss>internal medicine (in Chinese medical practice)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/本道-632418 see 3rd meaning, or the 世界大百科事典 第２版 entry

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>internal medicine (in Chinese medicinal practice), synonym 内科, antonym 外科</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>alleyway</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>裏通</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

ずるい only applies to sense 1.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>dishonest</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>dishonest</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<stagr>こすい</stagr>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<s_inf>esp. こすい</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -28,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>mean</gloss>
+<gloss>stingy</gloss>

GG4

GG4 entry for zurui includes "[不正な] unfair; foul; dishonest", but entry for kosui 
does not. I don't know if dishonest/unfair merit a stagr tag, so I've left it alone.

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>unfair</gloss>

Done.

@@ -17,7 +16,0 @@
-<reb>おと</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おとと</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -32,0 +26 @@
+<stagr>おとうと</stagr>

Yes, please make those changes. I see for おとと Daijirin has "「おとうと」の転".

daij, koj
おとと: "きょうだいの中で年少の者。古くは，おとうとにもいもうとにも用いた。"
おと: "兄から見たおとうと。また，姉から見たいもうと。

Added sense. It's in all the kokugos but not the JEs.
おとと isn't irregular, it's archaic (as is おと). I don't think おとと and おと belong here. They have slightly different definitions. Can I make new entries for them?
I don't really consider sense 1 humble.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<misc>&hum;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +31,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1225850">義弟・1</xref>
+<gloss>brother-in-law (spouse's younger brother or younger sister's husband)</gloss>

GG5, Wisdom, Genius

Adding little brother and kid brother would allow for better reverse searching.

@@ -29,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>little brother</gloss>
+<gloss>kid brother</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,0 +40 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 揚げ足を取る │ 16,570 │ 64.4% │
│ 挙げ足を取る │    243 │  0.9% │
│ あげ足を取る │  1,434 │  5.6% │
│ 揚げ足をとる │  6,183 │ 24.0% │
│ 挙げ足をとる │    146 │  0.6% │
│ あげ足をとる │  1,156 │  4.5% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,15 @@
+<keb>あげ足を取る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あげ足をとる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上げ足を取る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上げ足をとる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +27 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +31 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to find fault with someone</gloss>
-<gloss>to flame someone</gloss>
-<gloss>to trip up somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>to jump on someone's (verbal) mistake</gloss>
+<gloss>to trip someone up</gloss>
+<gloss>to find fault with something someone says</gloss>

GG5: (音楽)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brass_instrument

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>brass musical instruments</gloss>
+<gloss>brass instrument</gloss>

GG5: frying food that has been thinly 「sliced [poured]

No, it's frying/baking a thin object; not "frying thinly".

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1837180">厚焼き</xref>
-<gloss>frying or baking something thinly (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thin (e.g. thin omelette)</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>frying or baking something thin (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thinly (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>

daijr gg5

Seems like this was wrong.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>薄焼</keb>
@@ -16,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>lightly fried</gloss>
-<gloss>lightly baked</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1837180">厚焼き</xref>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thin (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>lightly fried or baked</gloss>
+<gloss>lightly fried</gloss>
+<gloss>lightly baked</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&Shinto;</field>

see comment on 御神体

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>object of worship housed in a Shinto shrine and believed to contain the spirit of a deity</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">object of worship believed to contain the spirit of a deity, typically housed in a shrine</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I agree.

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>object in which a deity resides</gloss>
+<gloss>shintai</gloss>
+<gloss>object of worship housed in a Shinto shrine and believed to contain the spirit of a deity</gloss>

should probably be aligned with the 御神体 entry

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>an object in which a deity resides</gloss>
+<gloss>object in which a deity resides</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典, Kagaku, Igaku

I think this is closer.

@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>approach route</gloss>
-<gloss>entrance lane</gloss>
-<gloss>driveway</gloss>
-<gloss>front walk</gloss>
+<gloss>approach path (aircraft, surgery)</gloss>
+<gloss>entrance ramp (highway)</gloss>
+<gloss>on-ramp</gloss>
+<gloss>slip road</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=進入路

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>(aircraft's) approach</gloss>
+<gloss>approach route</gloss>
+<gloss>entrance lane</gloss>
+<gloss>driveway</gloss>
+<gloss>front walk</gloss>

I disagree. An omelette is a thick object; not a thickly object. "Thickly" would have to apply to the verb "to fry", which is not meaningful.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>frying or baking something thick (e.g. omelette)</gloss>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thickly (e.g. omelette)</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>frying or baking something thick (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thick (e.g. omelette)</gloss>

daijr gg5

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>厚焼</keb>
@@ -12 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>thickly sliced food</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1690570">薄焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1690570">薄焼き</xref>
+<gloss>frying or baking something thick (e.g. an omelette)</gloss>

junk, i think

is this a some marchandise or one that can see through after drench by rain?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renminbi

I think this order makes more sense.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Chinese Yuan</gloss>
-<gloss>renminbi (currency)</gloss>
+<gloss>renminbi</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese yuan</gloss>

gg5, prog

Clearer to split into senses.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1569240">狡い</xref>
@@ -15 +14,9 @@
-<gloss>sneaky person</gloss>
+<gloss>sly trick</gloss>
+<gloss>foul play</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>cunning person</gloss>
+<gloss>sly fellow</gloss>
+<gloss>cheat</gloss>

Entry created

I don't mind having it, along with ドル建て and 円建て.

A+B? Not in the refs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Entry created

Ok. I suppose it could be helpful.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>in development</gloss>

see previous nom for deletion.  personally, i don't really have a problem with this one staying

google ngrams: 4149333

A+B but i'm not convinced it should be deleted.  definitely not limited to comp, so i'm removing that and renominating

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

A+B.

Entry created

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij, etc.

daijs wiki

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レア・シュガー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2837046">希少糖</xref>

daijs

Nakaguro missing (on my phone)

Google image results for 展望台 and 展望室 are different.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1440650">展望台</xref>
-<gloss>observation deck</gloss>
+<gloss>(indoor) observation deck</gloss>
+<gloss>observation room</gloss>
+<gloss>observatory</gloss>

g ng
展望台	1155812
展望室	77706
http://www.yokoso.metro.tokyo.jp/tenbou/index.html
"展望室のご利用案内"

g ng 

構内図	12956

g ng

大ナマズ	5401
大鯰	1778
mentioned in daijs 鯰江 entry and their ナマズ entry as well

daijs wiki
g ng
鯰絵	1994
なまず絵	114

eij, jst
g ng

写真用紙	35518
フォト用紙	7563

g ng

写真用紙	35518
フォト用紙	7563
https://www.amazon.co.jp/フォト用紙/b?ie=UTF8&node=89349051　"写真用紙・フォト用紙 通販"

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1364440">神・かみ・1</xref>

I think "sacred" is more appropriate English. "Divine" really means the mountain itself is a deity.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>divine mountain</gloss>
+<gloss>sacred mountain</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">mountain which in the spirit of a kami resides</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">mountain in which the spirit of a deity resides</gloss>

daijr 世界大百科事典

glosses could be improved

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/韓国学 
http://intl.aks.ac.kr/japanese/viewforum.php?f=18

worshiping 170381
worshipping 521052

I'll take a middle path.
Even AmE tends to double the "p".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (common form of worshipping at a shrine)</gloss>

To be clear, I think any of these would be an improvement:

(a standard form of worshiping at a shrine)   # (maybe my favorite, even with the article, but we don't like articles)

(the standard form of worshiping at a shrine) # (opinionated, but probably accurate.  I think this is objectively the standard form of worshiping at a Shinto Shrine in Japan

(common form of worshiping at a shrine)       # True enough

(form of worshiping at a shrine)              # Safe but inoffensive, loses some information

Don't really need a reference for this, but I can say the wikipedia page includes the note:
なお、拝礼の作法は神社や地域によって特色があり、厳格な決まりはない[4]。 (no rules, worship etiquette may vary by shrine and region)

二礼二拍手一礼
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/二礼二拍手一礼

Another historical, less common pattern is, for example:
三礼三拍手一礼

I invite comments/changes to this edit.  Sorry if this seems overly trivial, I'm making this post as a not-overly-sensitive person :)

I had replaced "standard" with "common", but ended up convincing myself to remove that as well.

My question/emotional reaction when reading this definition is "*a* standard form of worship" or "*the* standard form of worship".

Oddly, I wouldn't mind either one personally, but I don't like the feeling of trying to "guess" what the dictionary is saying.  The problem is that this practice is, so far as I can tell from personal experience and google, objectively "the standard", with the proviso that there are still other ways to do this at different shrines and different regions (different numbers of claps, different numbers of bows).  If we mean "the standard", I think "the" should be added unambiguously, even though policy shies away from articles.  If we don't want to make such a committal assertion, we could say "a standard".

Or, if we don't want an article, and don't want to take a firm stance on Japanese religious practices, "common" seems easily fair enough given the prevalence of this ritual in Japanese society.

Or, we could just say "(form of worshiping at a shrine)", the only loss being that it really is super-common, and we're no longer communicating that.

I've searched pretty much every gloss with "standard" in it, and this issue really is limited to just this, and one related entry (or I would have gone the github route).

If a change is made/accepted here, the identical change should be made to the entry 二拝二拍一拝.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (standard form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>

g ng
二礼二拍手一礼	4847
二礼二拍一礼	1404
二礼二拍手一拝	292
二礼二拍一拝	35
https://www.xn--t8j4c7dy42mj9kt8e4tsjg7cfa.net/nireinihakuichirei/
”参拝で行うこの作法のことを「二礼二拍手一礼」といいます。"

Reconciling gloss with change in 二礼二拍手一礼.
(apologies, my comment on 二礼二拍手一礼 had the wrong kanji for this entry).

Was wondering if this is an [abbr], but that seems like a bad idea given that there are also 3 or 4 other variations of this phrase that are commonly used, and this is probably still the second-most common form overall.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (standard form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (common form of worshipping at a shrine)</gloss>

g ng
二礼二拍手一礼	4847
二礼二拍一礼	1404
二礼二拍手一拝	292
二礼二拍一拝	35
https://www.xn--t8j4c7dy42mj9kt8e4tsjg7cfa.net/nireinihakuichirei/
”二礼二拍一礼は参拝の基本。その歴史と考え方とは。"