daij, gg5, prog, 中辞典

I think "reflection" should be a separate sense, as in daijs.
Revised sense 1 and 2 glosses.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -18,5 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>reflection</gloss>
-<gloss>image</gloss>
-<gloss>picture (e.g. on a television)</gloss>
-<gloss>shot</gloss>
+<gloss>image (on a screen)</gloss>
+<gloss>picture (e.g. on a TV)</gloss>
@@ -26 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -30,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>clip</gloss>
-<gloss>video recording</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +29,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>image in one's mind</gloss>
+<gloss>reflection</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>image (in one's mind)</gloss>

新和英中辞典

No two references agree on the sense splitting here. I suspect "reflection" is a bit different, but I'm happy to go along with this.

@@ -37,0 +37,1 @@
+<gloss>mental picture</gloss>

The current definition doesn't seem to give much indication that 映像 commonly refers to 
video. There's just "clip" at the end of the definition, but that's perhaps confusing because 
that would seem to be a distinct sense – the other glosses mostly sound like still images, 
but "clip" is given in the definition as just another gloss for the same sense. 
"video recording" is from Genius WaEi
"image in one's mind" is from Kojien: 頭の中に浮かんだ、ものの姿

Here are some examples from 
http://eow.alc.co.jp/����/EUC-JP/
.
映像、活字、音楽のマルチメディア作戦で大ヒットさせたのです。
His multi-media strategy of film, printing, and music, made the movie a great hit.

映像
footage

映像に映っていた＿人の人物
__ people spotted on the footage

映像の中の男性
man in a video

映像の送波
video transmission

映像の特殊効果をつくり出す工程は、私には魅力的だ。
The process of creating special video effects is fascinating to me.

映像をスローモーションで見る
watch a picture in slow motion

映像を共有する
video-sharing

映像を利用する
use footage

映像を含むブログ
video weblog

映像コーデック
video codec《コ》

@@ -23,0 +23,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>video</gloss>
+<gloss>film</gloss>
+<gloss>footage</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +31,6 @@
+<gloss>video recording</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>image in one's mind</gloss>

Sentences adjusted.

daij, gg5, prog

All of my refs have the "put up/raise/display" sense first so I've moved it up. Affects 4 sentences.
Added a "hold up high" sense (Daijr sense 2).
The fire sense is archaic.

@@ -19,3 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>to publish</gloss>
-<gloss>to print</gloss>
-<gloss>to carry (an article)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put up (a notice, sign, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out (e.g. a banner)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fly (e.g. a flag)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hoist</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise</gloss>
+<gloss>to display</gloss>
@@ -26,5 +29,17 @@
-<gloss>to put up</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang out</gloss>
-<gloss>to hoist</gloss>
-<gloss>to fly (a sail)</gloss>
-<gloss>to float (a flag, kite, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold up high</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise overhead</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to tout (a principle, plan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to herald</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold up (an ideal)</gloss>
+<gloss>to parade (e.g. a slogan)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to publish</gloss>
+<gloss>to print</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry (e.g. an article)</gloss>
@@ -41,8 +56,3 @@
-<gloss>to tout (a principle, plan, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to adopt (a slogan)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to stoke a fire</gloss>
-<gloss>to fan a flame</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to stoke (a fire)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fan (a flame)</gloss>

daijr, daijs, prog
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/掲げる

@@ -30,2 +30,1 @@
-<gloss>to float (a flag)</gloss>
-<gloss>to tout</gloss>
+<gloss>to float (a flag, kite, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -36,1 +35,14 @@
-<gloss>to set forth (provision)</gloss>
+<gloss>to tuck up (e.g. sleeves)</gloss>
+<gloss>to roll up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to tout (a principle, plan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to adopt (a slogan)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to stoke a fire</gloss>
+<gloss>to fan a flame</gloss>

I don't think the glosses should be whole sentences.

@@ -29,4 +29,3 @@
-<gloss>it goes without saying</gloss>
-<gloss>there is no need to say so, but of course</gloss>
-<gloss>it is needless to say</gloss>
-<gloss>it need scarcely be said</gloss>
+<gloss>goes without saying</gloss>
+<gloss>needless to say</gloss>
+<gloss>obvious</gloss>

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>言うまでも無い</keb>

成る程.

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant include that detail in this entry, not create a separate entry for 親しんで.
Yes, I think "familiar" is better.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>affectionate term</s_inf>
+<s_inf>familiar term</s_inf>

親しむ	331996
親しんで	186140

Would "familiar term" work?
親しんで is certainly common.

gg5
daijr: "かしら立つ人，その道の長たる人を，親しんで呼ぶ語。「いよいよ―のお出ましだ」"

I think it would be good to include "親しんで" in some way.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>affectionate term</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>headman</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -49 +49 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -39 +39,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

gg5
daijr: "数ははっきりしないが，あまり多くはないことを表す。"

I think sense 1 is adj-no only.

@@ -32 +31,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5, prog

I think this is clearer.

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>to create (an atmosphere, feeling, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to produce</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to bring about</gloss>

Unidic/ngrams.

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>醸しだす</keb>

gg5

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to pile up</gloss>
+<gloss>to stack up</gloss>

デジタル大辞泉

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>積重なる</keb>

Indeed, but now that そうこん is tagged as [form], they're best kept separate.

爪痕	61001	32.5%
爪あと	44737	23.8%
爪跡	18883	10.0%
つめ跡	9892	5.3%
ツメ跡	2076	1.1%
ツメアト	737	0.4%
つめあと	5906	3.1%

Merging the two would not be so complicated now that we've adopted a simplified reading restrictions system.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,8 +22,0 @@
-<re_restr>爪痕</re_restr>
-<re_restr>爪あと</re_restr>
-<re_restr>爪跡</re_restr>
-<re_restr>つめ跡</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ツメあと</reb>
-<re_restr>ツメ跡</re_restr>
@@ -32,2 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2846304">爪痕・そうこん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2846304">爪痕・そうこん</xref>

三省堂国語辞典
つめあと「爪痕」... (definitions agree with current definitions, this is the only kanji given, no entry for そうこん whatsoever)

「爪痕(つめあと)を残す」 (a whole NHK article just on this expression, no alt kanji, no alt readings)
https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/kotoba/20210101_3.html

I see on 2846304 a comment by Jim Breen that there was an abandoned attempt to merge these two entries. (そうこん 爪痕).  I don't have a strong opinion on merging them or not, but this seems to have left an odd situation.

1. The most common reading of 爪痕 appears to actually be つめあと. But if you look up 爪痕 by kanji in this dictionary, you now get an entry with only one reading そうこん, and a reference to this entry, where 爪痕 is a *secondary* reading of つめあと.

2. 爪痕 appears to be the most common kanji for つめあと, not 爪跡.  My modern dictionary, for example, *only* gives 爪痕, and does not even contain an entry for the reading "そうこん".

Beyond my one dictionary reference, you need only google 爪痕 to see that つめあと is the most common reading.  The n-grams already cited here support this interpretation (granted a confounding factor from そうこん). 

I'm submitting a parallel change to the other entry that I think reconciles things "well enough" without merging the two entries.  Mark そうこん as [form], reference this entry using the same kanji 爪痕, re-order the kanji in this entry so that 爪痕 is the most common entry. Provide a back reference from this entry to the other to identify the existence of the literary form.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>爪跡</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>爪跡</keb>
@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<re_restr>爪跡</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<re_restr>爪跡</re_restr>
@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2846304">爪痕・そうこん</xref>

daij, prog
G n-grams:
爪痕	61001
爪跡	18883
爪あと	44737
つめ跡	9892
ツメ跡	2076
つめ痕	431
ツメ痕	195

@@ -9,0 +10,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>爪あと</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つめ跡</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ツメ跡</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +21,8 @@
+<re_restr>爪跡</re_restr>
+<re_restr>爪痕</re_restr>
+<re_restr>爪あと</re_restr>
+<re_restr>つめ跡</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ツメあと</reb>
+<re_restr>ツメ跡</re_restr>
@@ -20 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>scar</gloss>
+<gloss>scars (e.g. of war)</gloss>
+<gloss>traces (of damage)</gloss>

seven strings not supported by any kokugo or encyclopedia

@@ -38 +38 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">six- or seven-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">six-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>

updating to match full form

@@ -35 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>six-stringed Japanese zither</gloss>
+<gloss>wagon</gloss>
+<gloss>yamatogoto</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">six- or seven-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj
daijs デジタル大辞泉
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/4242/m0u/あずま/

* Elab “eastern Japan” sense – it’s had specific Kantō meanings over the centuries.
* Move “east” sense down – only saw in daijs, which dicts preferring “eastern Japan”
* Also marked “eastern Japan” sense as [arch] – per dicts it’s used through Edo period, but doesn’t seem used later (GG5 marks as 古称).
(Anecdotally, mentioned in class, and teacher didn’t recognize it as a word, stating あずま was only used as a name, so doesn’t seem understandable.)

@@ -23,1 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>east</gloss>
+<gloss>eastern Japan (esp. Kamakura or Edo, from perspective of Kyoto or Nara)</gloss>
+<gloss>eastern provinces</gloss>
@@ -27,1 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>eastern Japan</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>east</gloss>

daij, gg5

Not a 形容動詞.
Added sense.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20,8 @@
+<gloss>equal value</gloss>
+<gloss>parity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1453080">同値</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1453080">同値</xref>
+<gloss>(logical) equivalence</gloss>

daij, gg5

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<gloss>equivalence</gloss>
-<gloss>equal value</gloss>
-<gloss>equivalent</gloss>
+<gloss>(logical) equivalence</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Thanks; done now.

I kept it open because Jim said he needs to tag sentences.

feel free to self-approve a change such as this

[n] goes first.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

G n-grams:
 波打つ	69295
 波うつ	 4817

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>波うつ</keb>

Our only sentence is sense 2.

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting into senses.

@@ -17 +17,10 @@
-<gloss>to dash against</gloss>
+<gloss>to dash against (of waves)</gloss>
+<gloss>to billow</gloss>
+<gloss>to roll</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to wave (e.g. in the wind)</gloss>
+<gloss>to heave</gloss>
+<gloss>to pound (of a heart)</gloss>
@@ -19,3 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>to wave</gloss>
-<gloss>to heave</gloss>
-<gloss>to beat fast (heart)</gloss>

OK

I agree. I'd also drop the corresponding sense from the 正字 entry.

I think this is bringing in a Chinese sense which is not relevant to the Japanese term. The kokugos have just the first three senses, and I feel that's enough.

@@ -21,4 +20,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>original Chinese character before a different variant was listed in the Kangxi Dictionary</gloss>

https://web.archive.org/web/20090928045602/http://www.geocities.jp/umezu34/Kouza/kouza203.html
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1434872324

to differentiate from 正字

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>original Chinese character before a different variant was listed in the Kangxi Dictionary</gloss>

嵌まる	12104	0.7%
填まる	1150	0.1%
塡まる	0	0.0% (mk,daijr)
嵌る	62679	3.4%
填る	2249	0.1%　not in other dics, removing
はまる	956843	52.4%
ハマる	792469	43.4%


嵌まって	28894	0.6%
填まって	2532	0.1%
塡まって	0	0.0%
嵌って	165722	3.4%
填って	5965	0.1%
はまって	3000984	61.4%
ハマって	1684891	34.5%

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -9,0 +9,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>塡まる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,4 +16,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>填る</keb>
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@
-<gloss>to be addicted to</gloss>
-<gloss>to be deep into</gloss>
-<gloss>to be crazy about</gloss>
-<gloss>to be stuck on</gloss>
+<gloss>to get addicted to</gloss>
+<gloss>to get deep into</gloss>
+<gloss>to become crazy about</gloss>
+<gloss>to become stuck on</gloss>

I think that's right.

Yes, i think "fitted with" is good, but i just wanted to leave a comment. i think the particles in that sentence are interesting. it is not a "kin no buresuretto" but a "kin ni hamatta", that is "emeralds embedded in gold (of the bracelet)", assuming i understand it right.

I think the "fitted with" suits that OK. "embedded" is probably too specific.

@@ -36 +35,0 @@
-<gloss>to be embedded with</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting into senses.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to be choppy</gloss>
+<gloss>to be choppy (of waves)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be rough</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to billow</gloss>
@@ -17 +19,11 @@
-<gloss>to billow</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to wave (e.g. in the wind)</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat fast (of a heart)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be in turmoil</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>to have troubles</gloss>
+<gloss>to experience problems</gloss>

中辞典 does too.

I guess it's OK.

Trying to distinguish from 人口. GG5 marks it as a biology term but I'm not sure if that's right.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>population</gloss>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>population (e.g. of animals)</gloss>

GG5 has "Clione limacina" too, but doesn't gloss it as "clione".

I guess if it's only "esp. of species Clione limacina" it can be just "clione".

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クリオネ

I capitalised "Clione" because I assumed it did refer to the genus (in addition to the species Clione limacina). I realise now that can't be right (because there's no 属 after クリオネ).
That being said, I'm still not sure what クリオネ actually refers to. The jwiki article suggests it's a common name for species of genus Clione, but according to daijr, it *only* refers to Clione limacina, in which case the gloss should be "common clione".
Even if Wikipedia is correct, I'm not seeing any evidence that "Clione" refers to anything other than the genus. It appears to be always capitalised.

if capitalized, it commits a category error.  "Clione" refers to a genus (i.e., it's the proper name of a taxon; in Japanese, クリオネ属) not to individual organisms that belong to the genus.  at best, they would be "cliones" (uncapitalized), assuming that this genus name is in fact used as the common name of the organisms.  the original uncapitalized gloss was correct.  also, the gloss should not say it refers to the genus, since the genus name in Japanese is クリオネ属.  this is a member of the genus

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Clione (genus of small floating sea slugs, esp. Clione limacina)</gloss>
+<gloss>clione (small floating sea slug of the genus Clione, esp. of species Clione limacina)</gloss>

gg5
daijr: "マキガイ綱ハダカカメガイ目の一種ハダカカメガイの通称。"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clione

Better?

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>clione</gloss>
+<gloss>Clione (genus of small floating sea slugs, esp. Clione limacina)</gloss>
+<gloss>naked sea butterfly</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>to lead (e.g troops)</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead (e.g. troops)</gloss>

引っ提げて	14402
引っさげて	55536
提げて	        54081
引っ下げて	1696

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>引っ提げる</keb>
+<keb>引っさげる</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>引っさげる</keb>
+<keb>引っ提げる</keb>

daijs, nikk

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>引っ下げる</keb>

gg5, prog, daij
G n-grams:
引っ提げる	85
引っさげる	220
ひっ提げる	No matches
ひっさげる	195

Added senses.
I don't think [col] is right.
Not [uk].
Don't need the x-ref.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ひっ提げる</keb>
+<keb>引っさげる</keb>
@@ -18,5 +18,16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1436310">提げる・さげる・1</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>to carry in one's own hands</gloss>
-<gloss>to carry in a manner that is obvious to others</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to carry in one's hand</gloss>
+<gloss>to have in one's hand</gloss>
+<gloss>to take with one</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to lead (e.g troops)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to present (an issue, policy, artistic work, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take up</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring to the fore</gloss>

Sorry to have overlooked that. Yes, ゴン is in the kanwa part of 広辞苑. I've added it to kanjidic.

See edit #6 below

Shouldn't we add the go-on reading ゴン to KanjiDic?

I've been reading up on "zither" and it seems it's very widely used for plucked string instruments. Although "zither" is German it's from a Greek root; in fact the same root as "guitar". And it's used widely as a family name, so I guess I'll just have to accept it. "zither-like instrument" is too clumsy.

english wikipedia says six or seven but this is unreferenced and is not supported by japanese wikipedia, britannica or any japanese dictionary

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">six- or seven-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">six-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>

koj:
  音: キン(漢)　ゴン(呉)
  訓: こと

let's leave this open until Jim has checked the KanjiDic entry 琴

I've only seen it as six-stringed.

all of my sources (encyclopedias and dictionaries) say six as in the original entry.  there is an unreferenced english wikipedia page that says six or seven

similar to a guitar, there may be variants with >6 strings.  but all japanese sources say this has six strings

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">six- or seven-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">six-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>

koj

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>吾妻琴</keb>

aligning with 2204940
I don't think "azumagoto" works as a gloss, I cannot find many examples on the web

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>six-stringed Japanese zither</gloss>
+<gloss>wagon</gloss>
+<gloss>yamatogoto</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">six- or seven-stringed native Japanese zither</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>character class (e.g. distinct kanji character and its alternate written forms)</gloss>
+<gloss>character class (e.g. distinct kanji character and its alternative written forms)</gloss>

Perhaps not the best wording but I think something like this is more informative.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>character class</gloss>
-<gloss>set of related or similar characters</gloss>
+<gloss>character class (e.g. distinct kanji character and its alternate written forms)</gloss>

Thank you. Sasuga desu... I think you perfectly expressed the two meanings that can be found here:
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/243036/m1u/字種/
"set of related or similar characters" is problably the most encountered sense.

[The original was put in by Clément in 2009, based on Daijirin's "文字の集合を構成している一つ一つの文字。字の異なり。特に，漢字についていうことが多い。".]
How does the above look?

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>character (as element of a set or list of characters)</gloss>
+<gloss>character class</gloss>
+<gloss>set of related or similar characters</gloss>

I didn't mind it, but let it be.

Mixing Jap and Eng like that is confusing

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>filled pause (e.g. um, er, ee-to)</gloss>
+<gloss>filled pause (e.g. um, er)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>filler word</gloss>

http://www.is.cs.cmu.edu/trl_conventions/filled_pauses.html

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>filled pause</gloss>
+<gloss>filled pause (e.g. um, er, ee-to)</gloss>

daijs, daijr

daij, koj, meikyo

Splitting "man" into separate sense.
Added senses.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +24,17 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1542530">雄叫び</xref>
+<gloss>manly</gloss>
+<gloss>brave</gloss>
+<gloss>heroic</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1608700">雄滝</xref>
+<gloss>larger (of the two)</gloss>
+<gloss>greater</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2742880">雌・め・1</xref>

koj, daij, gg5

koj, gg5

Intransitive, not transitive.
I don't think the last two glosses are necessary.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to become the head</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to become the head (of a group, organization, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>to rank above</gloss>
-<gloss>to stand above</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>to become the head</gloss>
+<gloss>to rise to the top</gloss>

daij 斎藤和英大辞典

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panda_bonds

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

https://www.ifinance.ne.jp/glossary/bond/bon228.html

G n-grams:
申す迄もなく	243
申すまでもなく	18957

Pretty common. I think it's worth having.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>申すまでもなく</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>申す迄も無く</keb>
@@ -11,2 +17,6 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Needless to say</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2067940">言うまでもなく</xref>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>needless to say</gloss>
+<gloss>obviously</gloss>
+<gloss>of course</gloss>

吾輩は猫である (1906), 
from:
Natsume Soseki, Teihon Soseki zenshu vol. 1, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2016, pag. 158
https://www.iwanami.co.jp/book/b266526.html

It is the same of the less formal sentence 言うまでもなく.

Seems OK.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>Stop it!</gloss>
-<gloss>Enough!</gloss>
+<gloss>stop it!</gloss>
+<gloss>enough!</gloss>
+<gloss>cut it out</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1050650755

Combination of よせ + やい, but seems common enough to merit an entry (44,500 google hits). Also it's not immediately clear how to split the phrase in order to look 
up its meaning if you don't know よせ or やい, so it could be useful to have an entry for it.

This is used in daijs's definition of 切米.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

sK as it's uncommon.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>salary in rice</gloss>
-<gloss>rice given as official pay</gloss>
+<gloss>rice given as salary</gloss>

祿 is [oK]

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

俸禄米	178	1.7%
俸祿米	0	0.0%

俸禄	10017	97.6%
俸祿	73	0.7%

Flagged a separate entry for 俸祿米 for deletion.
俸禄 and  俸祿 are already one entry.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俸祿米</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>a bungle</gloss>
+<gloss>bungle</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc..
やりそこない	335
やり損ない	231
やり損い	38
遣り損ない	< 20
遣り損い	< 20

Not common

傍から見る	23316
端から見る	16366
はたから見る	18352
傍からみる	2715
端からみる	1425

That shouldn't have been missed. 傍から is also そばから, but it's part of the (uk) 側から/傍から which confuses things.
A year ago you posted about ``Terrace House 「端からみてると 分かんないじゃん？」translated by Netflix as "I can't tell by watching"''

@@ -8,0 +9,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>端から見る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>傍からみる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>端からみる</keb>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/傍から見る
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1042914890

傍から見る	23316
はたから見る	18352

Just saw someone use this on LINE.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>傍から見る</keb>
+</k_ele>

GG5 examples.
はたから見る	18352
はたから見ると	17272
はたから見れば	14761
はたから見て	16142

Useful expression. A lot of counts for 端から見る, etc. but they're not the same expression.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>from the point of view of an onlooker</gloss>
+<gloss>to be seen from the point of view of an onlooker</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=はたから見
http://yourei.jp/はたから見る

「そうかぁ？、はたから見たらまるで痴話喧嘩っぽかったぜ？」

gg5, jwiki

gg5, daijr/s

http://psnews.jp/cat/p/39986/
G n-grams:
サバトラ	16804
サバ虎	2913
鯖トラ	1176
鯖虎	632

The EJs have it as a gloss for "tattoo", but that may mislead people.

prog
km
タタタン	22

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

G n-grams:

バチコーン	4091
ばちこーん	2448

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ばちこーん</reb>

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/iries333/e/b3ab962f
b859ac9678c22d00bb02edbc
https://mobile.twitter.com/yu_iman/status/
771243479837978624

Heard on TV