adv

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>tinkling</gloss>
-<gloss>jingling</gloss>
+<gloss>with a tinkle</gloss>
+<gloss>with a jingle</gloss>
@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>whistling (of a kettle)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a whistle (of a kettle)</gloss>

daijr:  クロダイの幼魚の異名。主に関東でいう。
meikyo:  主に関東で、クロダイの幼魚の通称。

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>black porgy juvenile</gloss>
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>
+<gloss>juvenile black porgy</gloss>

Ref is 中辞典.

I think it's part of our sense 1.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>also</gloss>
+<gloss>as well</gloss>
@@ -52,5 +53,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>also</gloss>
-<gloss>as well</gloss>
-</sense>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/+でも

@@ -51,0 +52,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>also</gloss>
+<gloss>as well</gloss>
+</sense>

Looks OK.

accidentally removed a sense

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>still</gloss>
+<gloss>yet</gloss>
+<gloss>even so</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +25,1 @@
+<gloss>no matter how</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +27,5 @@
+<gloss>even though</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<gloss>... or something</gloss>

this is a somewhat awkward merge

@@ -8,10 +8,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>だって</reb>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たって</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ても</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -20,2 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>だって is more colloq.</s_inf>
@@ -24,4 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>still</gloss>
-<gloss>yet</gloss>
-<gloss>although</gloss>
-<gloss>even though</gloss>
+<gloss>though</gloss>
+<gloss>nevertheless</gloss>
@@ -30,1 +16,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<gloss>however</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +25,17 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>or something</gloss>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 〜でも〜でも</s_inf>
+<gloss>either ... or ...</gloss>
+<gloss>neither ... nor ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<s_inf>before an occupation, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>pseudo-</gloss>
+<gloss>quack</gloss>
+<gloss>in-name-only</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2643950">でもしか</xref>
+<s_inf>before an occupation, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>for lack of anything better to do</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>vigor</gloss>
+<gloss>vigour</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>fiend</gloss>

daijs has "鬼と畜生。転じて、残酷で、無慈悲な行いをする者。"
but daijr says "（鬼や畜生のように）人間らしい心をもっていない者。"

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>savage</gloss>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
無口	378538
無口な	132742
無口の	8385
無口を	3174
無口が	1420

Daijs is the only dictionary that has "また、その人". As Rene said, it's not really necessary to have more than one sense here.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,7 +20 @@
-<gloss>reticence</gloss>
-<gloss>taciturnity</gloss>
-<gloss>silent person</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
@@ -26 +22 @@
-<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
+<gloss>quiet</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>untalkative</gloss>

that reference doesn't say 'person'.  daijs does also have it as person though.  splitting by pos so that 'silent person' can be added, although it's arguably obvious and unnecessary

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -19 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +20,8 @@
-<gloss>person with a personality that doesn't speak a lot</gloss>
+<gloss>silent person</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>reticent</gloss>
+<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
+<gloss>silent</gloss>

http://i.imgur.com/lCwnFZN.png

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>person with a personality that doesn't speak a lot</gloss>

Thanks. I was about to turn it into nouns too.

i agree. 'trouble' needs to be in here somewhere, and i would prefer to have noun glosses.  also, 面倒 is ateji (daijs, koj)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +20,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
-<gloss>bothersome</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>bother</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,4 +26,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>difficult</gloss>
-<gloss>delicate</gloss>
-<gloss>hard</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>difficulty</gloss>

"コピーしてしまえば面倒がなくていい"
"ご面倒をかけてすみませんが..."
"面倒に巻き込む"
"面倒を起こす"

Given that noun usage is common for senses 1 and 2, I think noun glosses are preferable.

I'm not sure how you'd maintain the distinction in meaning, though. Both translate to "trouble".

gg5 koj daijs

@@ -19,2 +19,12 @@
-<gloss>trouble</gloss>
-<gloss>difficulty</gloss>
+<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
+<gloss>bothersome</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>difficult</gloss>
+<gloss>delicate</gloss>
+<gloss>hard</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

- sankoku has 端たない as a headword (wrapped in its '仮名書き可' parentheses)
- shinmeikai has this word as a subentry in its entry for はした【端た】
- obunsha has 端ない as a headword
- iwakoku states directly that this is 「端」の形容詞化。

None of these refs say it is ateji or a special reading / jukujikun.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 端ない　　 │     95 │  0.2% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ 端たない　 │    120 │  0.3% │ - [iK] to [rK]
│ はしたない │ 38,450 │ 99.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,2 +5,3 @@
-<keb>端ない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>端たない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,3 +10,2 @@
-<keb>端たない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>端ない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Since the 国語s are quiet on it being an ateji, I think I'll put it in a note, and close it.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Sorry, I meant [iK], not [oK]. Definitely irregular, not obsolete.
I can find quite a few recent examples of "端ない" on Twitter.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

is there any evidence that this is "obsolete"?  (i.e., is there any evidence it used to be a thing in the past but is no longer?  the uses i'm seeing online don't seem to come from old sources)  i think ateji makes more sense
--
also, 端たない seems to be more common than 端ない, since 端ない looks to get a lot more false positives.
--
overall i get <200 "real" google hits for both headwords combined (many/most of which don't seem to be real), which raises the question of whether it's worth recording at all, or if it's just a henkan error and should be iK

gg5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>taste buds</gloss>
+<gloss>taste bud</gloss>

Yes, I should have left that in.

当て外れ	2011
あて外れ	207
当てはずれ	901

I'm happy staying with "no".

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>あて外れ</keb>
+<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
+<keb>あて外れ</keb>

koj
見込みや期待がはずれること。「―の結果」

adj-no seems fine to me?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, daij, etc.
当て外れ	        2011
当て外れな	141
当て外れの	292

None of the refs have this as an adjective.
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -18,3 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1856780">当てが外れる</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>letdown</gloss>

I think it can stay. Wehave related ones such as ちらっと見る, 
and it's useful for the reverse direction.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2218820">ちらっと見る</xref>

is this entry needed at all?  the entry for じろり seems to be enough

gg5
daijr/s: "鋭い目つきで..."

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>to throw a glance</gloss>
+<gloss>to cast a sharp glance</gloss>

>the reference says that ギルト債 is 'gilt-edged security'

From Wikipedia: "英語ではgiltもしくはgilt-edged securityと呼ばれ、日本語でギルトもしくはギルト債とも呼ばれる。" So both.

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>gilt-edged security</gloss>
+<gloss>gilt</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833101">サバイバーズギルト</xref>
+<gloss>guilt</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

I don't think this x-ref is necessary.

@@ -21,3 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么九</keb>

http://www.niigatakmj.com/1hannyaku.htm

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断公九</keb>
@@ -19 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no end tiles or honor tiles</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>all simples (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>all simples</gloss>

FWIW 么 only arrived in the JIS standards recently.
I'll align the tan'yao in the メンタンピン entry.

断么 is in daijr/s; I shouldn't have added [sK]

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>
@@ -13,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>断么</keb>

http://mahjong-europe.org/portal/images/docs/Riichi-rules-2016-EN.pdf
  'Tanyao (All Simples) can be an open hand'
https://yakuza.fandom.com/wiki/Mahjong
  'All Simples / Tanyao'
https://riichi.wiki/Tanyao
  'Tanyao 「断么九」 or 「断幺九」 is a yaku, consisting of ...'


〈断／たん／タン〉〈やお／ヤオ／公／幺／么〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 断ヤオ　 │  1,510 │ 10.0% │
│ 断公　　 │    625 │  4.1% │
│ 断幺　　 │    348 │  2.3% │
│ たん公　 │     33 │  0.2% │
│ タンヤオ │ 11,571 │ 76.4% │
│ たんやお │    936 │  6.2% │
│ タンやお │    114 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think "tanyao" (without the apostrophe) is okay. That is how it is almost always written in translated video games, English-language documents and wikis (other than Wikipedia), online discussions, etc.

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+<keb>断公</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断幺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Drafting a change to have "tanyao" as a gloss, as discussed in entry 2753060.
If it's approved, 2749690・断ヤオ九 needs to be aligned.
I see in some entries we use "tan'yao". We should perhaps settle on one or the other.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>tanyao (winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles</gloss>

I think we can handle that odd kanji now.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>

@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>winning hand with a pung (or kong) of red dragon tiles</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>red dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>red dragon tile</gloss>

nikk, daijs entry for 紅中, enwiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong_tiles

Trimming. Agree with the generalization.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>temporary suspension of a public transportation service (e.g. train or bus)</gloss>
+<gloss>temporary suspension public transport service</gloss>

web

This is more general. The expression is used alone, or with 一部 instead of 一時 for example.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>一時運転見合わせ</keb>
+<keb>運転見合わせ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>運転見合わせ</keb>
+<keb>運転見合せ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>いちじうんてんみあわせ</reb>
+<reb>うんてんみあわせ</reb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2401390">運転を見合わせる</xref>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/運転見合わせ

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>運転見合わせ</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>temporary suspension of (train) service</gloss>
+<gloss>temporary suspension of a public transportation service (e.g. train or bus)</gloss>

Fair enough.

ngrams
一時運転見合わせ	17981

just an idea, maybe better for tatoeba... 
but I think this is so standard and so common it might have 
a place in the dictionary. It'd be useful for tourists 
using photo translation apps with jmdict as a base (if any 
such exist)

ok.

yes, this is clearly sense 8 of our entry for 置く
--
gg5's similar example in 措く is the following, which clearly doesn't match this usage:
今日をおいては二度とチャンスは来ない.　If we don't do it today there'll never be another chance. ｜ Today is the only chance we'll get.
--
not idiomatic, so i think we can do without it altogether

I'm really confused by this entry.
Surely the verb is 置く, not 措く? Literally means "to place/leave time".
In most contexts it means "wait". Standard example: "同期に失敗しました。しばらく時間をおいてから再度お試しください".
Also, noun glosses look really strange. I would change the headword to 時間をおく.

Better xref.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1643550">措いて・おいて</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136880">を措いて・をおいて</xref>

OK, we'll just go with 写真共有 alone.

These could be replaced by a single entry for 写真共有. I wasn't sure if they were worth an entry or not.

A+B and meaning is obvious.
Don't see a need for it.

web

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>millenials</gloss>
+<gloss>millennials</gloss>

daijs

daijs, wiki

I guess so.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>photograph sharing</gloss>

web

gg5

gg5

Eijiro

wiki