merging in rejected 2833096

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンポ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンボ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +14 @@
-<reb>チンポ</reb>
+<reb>ちんぼ</reb>
@@ -12 +18 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&chn;</misc>

G n-grams:
 ちんぽ	125356
 チンポ	124822

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンポ</reb>

gakken katakana has it with no mention of wasei

GG5, Daijr: "〔和 concept＋advertising〕"

Is it really wasei?

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>concept advertising</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コンセプト・アド</reb>

daijr/s

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Daijr equates them.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2833013">ドキュドラマ</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>docudrama</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドキュメンタリー・ドラマ</reb>

Our usual style now.

@@ -19,3 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>shot</gloss>
-<gloss>charge</gloss>
-<gloss>explosion</gloss>
+<gloss>one shot</gloss>
+<gloss>one charge</gloss>
+<gloss>one explosion</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>blow</gloss>
-<gloss>punch</gloss>
+<gloss>one blow</gloss>
+<gloss>one punch</gloss>
@@ -36,2 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>try</gloss>
-<gloss>attempt</gloss>
+<gloss>one try</gloss>
+<gloss>one attempt</gloss>

rīchi conversion

@@ -40,0 +41,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2192360">立直・リーチ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2192360">立直・リーチ・1</xref>
@@ -42 +44 @@
-<gloss>win on the first go-around after calling riichi</gloss>
+<gloss>win on the first go-around after calling rīchi</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

gg5

I don't think the anode ray x-ref is necessary.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1829520">陽極線</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1829520">陽極線</xref>
-<gloss>cathode rays</gloss>
+<gloss>cathode ray</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1829520">陽極線</xref>

koj

also 連続(的)微分可能

@@ -36,0 +37,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>continuously differentiable</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

I think this is clearer.
"without a hitch" isn't an adjective.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>smooth (e.g. skin or ground)</gloss>
+<gloss>smooth (of a surface)</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>soft</gloss>
@@ -31,3 +32,4 @@
-<gloss>fluent</gloss>
-<gloss>smooth (speaking)</gloss>
-<gloss>without a hitch</gloss>
+<gloss>smooth (of an action, proceedings, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>fluent (speech)</gloss>
+<gloss>fluid</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble-free</gloss>

すべらか is probably "uk", but I'm not sure it's worth a note.

the spelling variants are a mess anyway, and i think it shouldn't be our job to keep track of them in a JE where it just adds redundancy.
we should standardize on one spelling in the dictionary (Aus?) with additional spellings looked up on the fly from some kind of supplementary UK/Aus/Can - US translation file

I agree. The spelling variants are useful for E->J lookups, which is not relevant here.

gg5

I don't think we need spelling variants for examples.

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>quiet (e.g. neighbourhood, neighborhood)</gloss>
+<gloss>quiet (e.g. neighbourhood)</gloss>
+<gloss>peaceful</gloss>
+<gloss>tranquil</gloss>

[vi]: meikyo, smk, iwakoku, etc.

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog, 斎藤和英大辞典

Split sense 1.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>casual (e.g. dress)</gloss>
-<gloss>light</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>light (of movements)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,9 @@
+<gloss>sprightly</gloss>
+<gloss>springy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>light-hearted</gloss>
+<gloss>cheerful</gloss>
+<gloss>buoyant</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>casual (e.g. clothing)</gloss>
@@ -27 +37 @@
-<gloss>taking a turn for the better</gloss>
+<gloss>taking a turn for the better (of an illness)</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +39,2 @@
+<gloss>recovery</gloss>
+<gloss>convalescence</gloss>

https://kakaku.com/bb/hikari/

Common as part of product or business names.

@@ -42,0 +43,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2844299">光回線</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>optical fiber</gloss>
+<gloss>optical fibre</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr,GG5, 中辞, etc.

Refs are divided on the split of senses. I'm mainly following GG5 here.
I'm seeing Naomi Kawase's ひかり later this week, and the English title is "Radiance", which got me thinking about the breadth of meanings for 光.

@@ -19,0 +20,23 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>illumination</gloss>
+<gloss>ray</gloss>
+<gloss>beam</gloss>
+<gloss>gleam</gloss>
+<gloss>glow</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>happiness</gloss>
+<gloss>hope</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>influence</gloss>
+<gloss>power</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>vision</gloss>
+<gloss>eyesight</gloss>
+</sense>

moving to アカ

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2795290">アカ</xref>
-<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
-<gloss>account (e.g. for an online service)</gloss>

Yes, the slang tag and the xref to アカ is probably enough.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>垢 is ateji</s_inf>

daijr

Sense 2 is definitely internet slang. We can probably drop the ateji note.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>account (e.g. online service)</gloss>
+<gloss>account (e.g. for an online service)</gloss>

Agree.

@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<misc>&joc;</misc>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>垢 is ateji</s_inf>

rather than [joc,sl], i think we should have a note here.  basically this is ateji that's just being put here (rather than on the entry for アカ) for purpose of convenience

daij, gg5, prog

Reorganised senses. Old sense 7 was a mix of several existing senses.

@@ -15 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>to set up (e.g. a house)</gloss>
+<gloss>to set up (a house, store, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to build</gloss>
+<gloss>to establish</gloss>
+<gloss>to run</gloss>
+<gloss>to maintain</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>to have at the ready (e.g. a gun)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold in preparation (e.g. a camera)</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +27,28 @@
-<gloss>to prepare to use something (e.g. a camera)</gloss>
-<gloss>to have at the ready (e.g. a gun)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to adopt a posture</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume a stance</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand ready</gloss>
+<gloss>to be poised for</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to put on an air</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume an attitude</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to stiffen</gloss>
+<gloss>to tense up</gloss>
+<gloss>to become formal</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to fabricate in order to deceive</gloss>
+<gloss>to make up</gloss>
+<gloss>to feign</gloss>
@@ -30,26 +61,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to fabricate in order to deceive</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to stiffen</gloss>
-<gloss>to become formal</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to adopt a posture</gloss>
-<gloss>to take a fighting stance</gloss>
-<gloss>to square off</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to feign</gloss>
-<gloss>to display a front</gloss>
-<gloss>to act superior</gloss>
-<gloss>to put on airs</gloss>
-</sense>

Daijirin, GG5 (新和英大辞典第５版), etc.

That sense certainly looks intransitive to me.
I think that sense 8 is really part of sense 2.
Even now it's a lot of senses. GG5 has 5 and Daijirin 6.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>to set up (e.g. a building)</gloss>
+<gloss>to set up (e.g. a house)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to have at the ready (e.g. a gun)</gloss>
@@ -49,2 +50,3 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to feign, to display a front</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to feign</gloss>
+<gloss>to display a front</gloss>
@@ -54,5 +55,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to have (a gun, etc.) at the ready</gloss>
-</sense>

研究社 新和英中辞典 ("Kenkyusha's New College Japanese-English Dictionary") and 斎藤和英大辞典 ("Saito's Japanese-English Dictionary") via http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/構える

Is this verb always transitive? It seems to be used quite a bit without an object (although it could just be implicit). In sense [7], especially, it's usually used without a direct object, with additional information provided by an adverbial phrase.

@@ -39,0 +40,19 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to adopt a posture</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a fighting stance</gloss>
+<gloss>to square off</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to feign, to display a front</gloss>
+<gloss>to act superior</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on airs</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to have (a gun, etc.) at the ready</gloss>
+</sense>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11224216541
https://kanji.quus.net/jyukugo584/4jijyukugo.htm
etc

Ugly but such is life.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>４字熟語</keb>

OK

I think "esp." rather than "usu.", maybe?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>four-character compound word (usu. idiomatic)</gloss>
+<gloss>four-character compound word (esp. idiomatic)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>four-character compound word (usu. idomatic)</gloss>
+<gloss>four-character compound word (usu. idiomatic)</gloss>

daijr, daijs

Added kanji form.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>小噺</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I was probably the source of the "adj-no". The update records don't show anything. I've gone through heaps of Googled examples of 招集の and I must say I've not found anything really adjectival. I think it can safely be dropped.
The discussion of "adj-no" in general can happen elsewhere.

Just one last thing. We define adj-no in the help file as "nouns which may take the genitive case particle `no'" but isn't that every noun? e.g. スコットの車 (non-vs)　"要求の変更" "運転の経験" (vs).

And I found someone who agrees with me!: 

"As I understand it, the term “no-adjective” simply means “nouns which are typically translated to adjectives in English and other languages.” If we treat Japanese as a language in its own right, distinguishing them from nouns as different parts-of-speech is completely artificial.

The particle の makes a modifier of a noun. The exact relationship between the modifier and the modified noun can be almost anything; Daijisen lists fourteen relationships such as ownership, belonging, location of existence, location of action, time, and so on, and one of them is “attribute and condition.”"
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/2770/so-called-の-adjectives-how-does-の-really-work

So maybe the solution is getting rid of the tag adj-no altogether.

>There's no evidence because it's impossible to provide any. I can't prove the non-existence of an [adj-no] form with a Google search - 招集の still gets plenty of hits.

I can't help pointing out that this is an example of a probatio diabolica or  悪魔の証明 which I added as an entry a few days ago ;)

Concerning the main point of the debate, I wonder if adj-no is something that's recognized by other dictionaries and defined precisely. 

There's a controversy whether "Na-adjectives" (形容動詞) even exist. According to some, they're just 名詞 (nouns). I wonder how useful adj-no is as a category, though I may be missing something. 

I find examples like: "招集の理日": the reason for the convocation, "招集の通知": the notice for the meeting, 招集の請求: the application for the meeting/convocation. But that's the kind of construction that would apply to any "vs"(ーする) noun. 

So, I wonder what defines "adj-no". Is there even such a category? 

Just some thoughts. Cheers,

The problem isn't limited to Eijiro and I want to discuss the [adj-no] tag more generally so I will be posting to the (editors) mailing list.

>> you have proposed removing something that is currently in JEdict (and eijiro) with no evidence other than the unreferenced statement "not [adj-no]".

There's no evidence because it's impossible to provide any. I can't prove the non-existence of an [adj-no] form with a Google search - 招集の still gets plenty of hits.
When the adjectival form is expressed as [noun]的 or [noun]した I point it out but here there's no adjectival form at all.

I think fellow editors understand that there's an an implicit "I searched for examples of [adj-no] usage but couldn't find any" embedded in a comment like "not [adj-no]".
I've explained my reasoning for these edits in the past and have since removed dozens of [adj-no] tags without objection.

In most cases it's self-evident these nouns don't function as adjectives and that Eijiro is the only reason the tag was added.

But I'm happy to add "[Eijiro only]" to my comments in future if it makes things clearer.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>becoming more serious or severe (problem)</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming more serious or severe</gloss>
+<gloss>aggravation</gloss>
+<gloss>intensification</gloss>

正反対の	192,538			
正反対な	47,612

Aligning.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>exactly opposite (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>exactly the opposite (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely opposite</gloss>
+<gloss>quite contrary</gloss>

GG5 (has noun glosses first.)

gg5 koj daijs

"polar" etc not in my refs (except eij)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,4 +18 @@
-<gloss>bipolar</gloss>
-<gloss>polar</gloss>
-<gloss>polarity</gloss>
-<gloss>exactly opposite</gloss>
+<gloss>exactly opposite (of)</gloss>

mk

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog
切磋琢磨	230959
切瑳琢磨	672

Oddly, 切瑳琢磨 is the only form in GG5 and prog.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切瑳琢磨</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>diligent application (to work or study)</gloss>
@@ -19 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>diligent application</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>working hard together</gloss>
+<gloss>friendly rivalry</gloss>

daijs: "また、友人どうしで励まし合い競い合って向上すること"
koj: "また、仲間どうし互いに励まし合って学徳をみがくこと"

Feels like a separate sense to me.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>cultivate one's character by studying hard</gloss>
+<gloss>cultivating one's character by studying hard</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<gloss>mutual encouragement (to improve)</gloss>
+</sense>

meikyo

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

oops

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1393560">前貸し</xref>

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1393130">前借り</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1393130">前借り</xref>

gg5, prog

Don't agree with "loan".

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>advance (in pay)</gloss>
-<gloss>loan</gloss>
+<gloss>getting an advance (on one's salary)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1393130">前借り</xref>

shinmeikai says of the kitchen sink sense: 東北と西日本の方言, but others don't note it (and it looks arch-ish)

@@ -16 +16,19 @@
-<gloss>the first (harvest, catch) of the season or year</gloss>
+<gloss>running</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>gliding</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>first (harvest) of the season</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>start</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>kitchen sink</gloss>

[vt]: meikyo, smk, etc.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>expectant waiting</gloss>
+<gloss>waiting expectantly</gloss>
+<gloss>waiting eagerly</gloss>
+<gloss>looking forward to</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Redid entry.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -19,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>perhaps</gloss>
-<gloss>almost all</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>large part</gloss>
+<gloss>greater part</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,20 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>people in general</gloss>
+<gloss>general public</gloss>
+<gloss>public at large</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>mostly</gloss>
+<gloss>for the most part</gloss>
+<gloss>almost</gloss>
+<gloss>nearly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>probably</gloss>
+<gloss>maybe</gloss>
+<gloss>perhaps</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, daij

"Land speculation" doesn't carry the negative connotations that 地上げ does.
Daijr and Koj both have "強引に" in their definitions.
ちあげ reading isn't in the refs. Doesn't seem to be common either.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちあげ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>land speculation</gloss>
+<gloss>buying up plots of land by force to resell at a large profit</gloss>
+<gloss>land sharking</gloss>
@@ -24 +22 @@
-<gloss>raising the ground level</gloss>
+<gloss>raising the ground level (with fill)</gloss>

@@ -32 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>white go stone</gloss>
+<field>&go;</field>
+<gloss>white stone</gloss>

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2751420">白・はく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2751420">白・はく・4</xref>

I have heard しろ from a few commentators but it is less common than the pronunciation はく

@@ -35,0 +36,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2751420">白・はく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2751420">白・はく</xref>
@@ -37 +38,0 @@
-<s_inf>also read はく</s_inf>

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -37 +38 @@
-<gloss>white dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>white dragon tile</gloss>

ハク sounds kanwa. I think just a note.

@@ -36,0 +36,1 @@
+<s_inf>also read はく</s_inf>

in none of my references; no references provided

submit again with references if you have them

Usually used when listing all the yaku a hand has.

@@ -46,0 +47,5 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>winning hand with a pung (or kong) of green dragon tiles</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

@@ -40,0 +41 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -43 +44 @@
-<gloss>green dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>green dragon tile</gloss>

OK

The motivation for my search was basically a note from Chinese [which I do not have much knowledge of, other than its existence] which used "发". I check for the non-simplified version and found "發". Then I searched for that on your site [then followed the sequence which I explained].

I was only motivated to make the submission for the reason stated, so if there is a problem of linkage then I guess that settles that matter. Having got to where I got to, I have satisfied my own need for information.

daijr

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>奉燈</keb>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
無口	378538
無口な	132742
無口の	8385
無口を	3174
無口が	1420

Daijs is the only dictionary that has "また、その人". As Rene said, it's not really necessary to have more than one sense here.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,7 +20 @@
-<gloss>reticence</gloss>
-<gloss>taciturnity</gloss>
-<gloss>silent person</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
@@ -26 +22 @@
-<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
+<gloss>quiet</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>untalkative</gloss>

that reference doesn't say 'person'.  daijs does also have it as person though.  splitting by pos so that 'silent person' can be added, although it's arguably obvious and unnecessary

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -19 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +20,8 @@
-<gloss>person with a personality that doesn't speak a lot</gloss>
+<gloss>silent person</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>reticent</gloss>
+<gloss>taciturn</gloss>
+<gloss>silent</gloss>

http://i.imgur.com/lCwnFZN.png

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>person with a personality that doesn't speak a lot</gloss>

Thanks. I was about to turn it into nouns too.

i agree. 'trouble' needs to be in here somewhere, and i would prefer to have noun glosses.  also, 面倒 is ateji (daijs, koj)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +20,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
-<gloss>bothersome</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>bother</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,4 +26,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>difficult</gloss>
-<gloss>delicate</gloss>
-<gloss>hard</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>difficulty</gloss>

"コピーしてしまえば面倒がなくていい"
"ご面倒をかけてすみませんが..."
"面倒に巻き込む"
"面倒を起こす"

Given that noun usage is common for senses 1 and 2, I think noun glosses are preferable.

I'm not sure how you'd maintain the distinction in meaning, though. Both translate to "trouble".

gg5 koj daijs

@@ -19,2 +19,12 @@
-<gloss>trouble</gloss>
-<gloss>difficulty</gloss>
+<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
+<gloss>bothersome</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>difficult</gloss>
+<gloss>delicate</gloss>
+<gloss>hard</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Yes, my 1930s GG1(?) has "silent contempt". I agree the "No comment. We need more time" is poor. "Shunning" is a bit problematic too, although it may just work in some contexts.

From jawiki: "また、鈴木の孫の哲太郎は1995年（平成7年）の8月のNHKラジオの戦後50年特集番組において、「祖父の本心は『ノーコメント』と言いたかったのだと思
うが、陸軍の圧力で『黙殺』になってしまったのだろう。祖父は後で、あの『黙殺』発言は失敗だった、もっと別の表現があったと思うと漏らしていた」と語っている。"

Maybe the "contempt" bit is slightly more loaded than it has to be but I'm not really sure the New York Times article is on the ball 
here. Based on the kokugo's/wa-ei definitions, I have a hard time understanding how something like "黙殺します" could be interpreted to 
mean "No comment. We need more time." Googling a little for 鈴木貫太郎　黙殺 it seems that the issue might really have been a poor choice 
of words on behalf of Suzuki (or the media describing the government's position?) rather than an actual bonafide mistranslation. The 
whole story has the feels of an urban legend (though I could be wrong).
_
Looking at the examples in GG5 and prog especially, I don't see much of an issue with "shunning", if it's towards the end of the entry.

https://www.nsa.gov/news-features/declassified-documents/tech-journals/assets/files/mokusatsu.pdf

'silent contempt' appears to have been present in old versions of gg, but not the current one

gg5, prog

JEs only have adjective glosses.

@@ -19,4 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>grandeur</gloss>
-<gloss>magnificence</gloss>
-<gloss>splendour</gloss>
-<gloss>splendor</gloss>
+<gloss>grand</gloss>
+<gloss>magnificent</gloss>
+<gloss>majestic</gloss>
+<gloss>great</gloss>
+<gloss>sublime</gloss>

JLD, リーダーズ+プラス, WWW hits.

Not very common.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>油染みる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,4 @@
-<keb>油染みる</keb>
+<keb>油じみる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脂じみる</keb>

gg5, prog, daij

Added sense.
Qualified sense 1.
雨垂 is not in the refs, nor is it common. I think we can drop it.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>雨垂</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20 +17,8 @@
-<gloss>raindrops</gloss>
+<gloss>raindrops (dripping from eaves, branches, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1212500">感嘆符</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>exclamation point</gloss>
+<gloss>exclamation mark</gloss>

齲歯 is rK for むしば but not for うし/くし. I'll split out うし/くし into a separate entry.
I don't think 齲 is needed if it's only in kanjigen.

@@ -15,3 +15 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>齲</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,8 +22,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うし</reb>
-<re_restr>齲歯</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くし</reb>
-<re_restr>齲歯</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -34,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>tooth decay</gloss>
@@ -36 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>tooth decay</gloss>

2m googits

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>むし歯</keb>
@@ -32 +34,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -36 +38 @@
-<gloss>caries</gloss>
+<gloss>dental caries</gloss>

-うし is the only reading for 齲歯 in gg5, meikyo.
-kanjigen has むしば as a reading for 齲

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<keb>齲</keb>
+<keb>齲歯</keb>
@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<keb>齲歯</keb>
+<keb>齲</keb>
@@ -23,1 +23,1 @@
-<reb>くし</reb>
+<reb>うし</reb>
@@ -27,1 +27,1 @@
-<reb>うし</reb>
+<reb>くし</reb>

no evidence in daij/nikk that "齲" by itself can be read むし
ば..?

forked

i guess we can keep it as ateji or oK then.  i would have thought maybe henkan error, but that's unlikely to show up in multiple sources (one hopes)

中辞典 (has 端たない as headword.) JWN (possibly from JMdict). Goi Taikei and the JLD have it too

Rene also puzzled over it a bit in 2009 (old logs) when he recommended the ateji tag for it. As well as being in 中辞典 it's in the Ichiman reference, but parenthesized (《端たない》). It's also in a small JE that came with my old EB copy of Daijirin as 端ない.
I think it probably should stay; either as ateji or oK.

Like Rene, I'm puzzled by the [ichi1] tag.
端たない only gets a few dozen Google hits once you click through to the 4th page of results. I'm in favour of dropping it.
端ない is more common but I think it needs an [oK] tag.

none of mine either...  it's not even mentioned in a note in any of the dics.  is the kanji really ichi1?

- sankoku has 端たない as a headword (wrapped in its '仮名書き可' parentheses)
- shinmeikai has this word as a subentry in its entry for はした【端た】
- obunsha has 端ない as a headword
- iwakoku states directly that this is 「端」の形容詞化。

None of these refs say it is ateji or a special reading / jukujikun.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 端ない　　 │     95 │  0.2% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ 端たない　 │    120 │  0.3% │ - [iK] to [rK]
│ はしたない │ 38,450 │ 99.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,2 +5,3 @@
-<keb>端ない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>端たない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,3 +10,2 @@
-<keb>端たない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>端ない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Since the 国語s are quiet on it being an ateji, I think I'll put it in a note, and close it.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Sorry, I meant [iK], not [oK]. Definitely irregular, not obsolete.
I can find quite a few recent examples of "端ない" on Twitter.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

is there any evidence that this is "obsolete"?  (i.e., is there any evidence it used to be a thing in the past but is no longer?  the uses i'm seeing online don't seem to come from old sources)  i think ateji makes more sense
--
also, 端たない seems to be more common than 端ない, since 端ない looks to get a lot more false positives.
--
overall i get <200 "real" google hits for both headwords combined (many/most of which don't seem to be real), which raises the question of whether it's worth recording at all, or if it's just a henkan error and should be iK

GG5, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, リーダーズ+プラス

"ear canal" is the more usual English term, and the EJs gloss it to this term.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>external auditory canal (meatus)</gloss>
+<gloss>external auditory canal</gloss>
+<gloss>ear canal</gloss>
+<gloss>external auditory meatus</gloss>

We should probably add the current term. 虫取り装置?

百科事典マイペディア: "石油などを添加した水を入れた水盤を置き，光を求めて集まった昆虫を水中に落として殺す"
---
世界大百科事典: "走光性で集まる害虫を，水面に油滴，中性洗剤(界面活性剤)を落とした水盤に落下溺死させたり，殺虫剤を入れた箱，袋に集めて死亡させる"

誘蛾灯 is quite an old term and while Google images does show a lot of electric bug zappers, it's not the word typically used to describe such devices.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<gloss>light trap</gloss>
-<gloss>electric insect killer</gloss>
-<gloss>bug zapper</gloss>
+<gloss>light trap (for killing insects)</gloss>

aligning with  2833026

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>light trap for killing insects</gloss>
+<gloss>light trap</gloss>
+<gloss>electric insect killer</gloss>
+<gloss>bug zapper</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

prog, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>dancing in groups</gloss>
+<gloss>group dancing</gloss>

WWW hits. Most JEs only have the kana version.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Yes, I should have left that in.

当て外れ	2011
あて外れ	207
当てはずれ	901

I'm happy staying with "no".

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>あて外れ</keb>
+<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
+<keb>あて外れ</keb>

koj
見込みや期待がはずれること。「―の結果」

adj-no seems fine to me?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, daij, etc.
当て外れ	        2011
当て外れな	141
当て外れの	292

None of the refs have this as an adjective.
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -18,3 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1856780">当てが外れる</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>letdown</gloss>

yes, it doesn't belong here.  also おとこたち is standard use of a suffix

might be better to make a separate entry for　おとこたち

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>男たち</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おとこたち</reb>
@@ -23,0 +30,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>a group of men</gloss>
+</sense>

The modern refs only have sense 1.

@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<gloss>chivalrous man who helps the weak and fights the strong</gloss>
+<gloss>knight in shining armor</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>chivalrous man who helps the weak and fights the strong</gloss>
-<gloss>ruffians who acted under the pretence of being chivalrous</gloss>
+<gloss>ruffians who act under the pretence of being chivalrous</gloss>

koj daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>男達</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>chivalrous man</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1467220">任侠</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1870010">侠客</xref>
+<gloss>chivalrous man who helps the weak and fights the strong</gloss>
+<gloss>ruffians who acted under the pretence of being chivalrous</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1044080">クラスアクション</xref>
+<field>&law;</field>

gg5, eij

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>class-action (lawsuit)</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>class-action suit</gloss>
+<gloss>class-action lawsuit</gloss>

eij

looks like the hyphen is used when serving as attribute. i think both should be included to facilitate lookup.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>class action</gloss>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anode_ray

@@ -12,2 +12,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1170300">陰極線</xref>
-<gloss>anode rays</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833102">カナル線</xref>
+<gloss>anode ray</gloss>
+<gloss>positive ray</gloss>
+<gloss>canal ray</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1170300">陰極線</xref>

daij, koj

Added original meaning sense.

@@ -12,2 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>fine example</gloss>
-<gloss>the best</gloss>
+<gloss>finest example</gloss>
+<gloss>the best (of)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>white eyebrows</gloss>

I guess so, although it's harmless.

閑靖	152

Not in the kokugos or JEs. I don't think this is used in Japanese outside of kanbun translations.

""tranquility; tranquillity" consistency" consistency

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>tranquility</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>tranquil</gloss>
+<gloss>tranquillity</gloss>

OK. Let's leave them apart.

daijs

I thought that was always 気持ち*が*悪い but I see that daijs has it as a separate sense (plus another that we were missing).

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833073">気持ちが悪い</xref>
@@ -25,0 +25,11 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>feeling sick</gloss>
+<gloss>feeling unwell</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>uncomfortable</gloss>
+<gloss>annoying</gloss>
+<gloss>frustrating</gloss>

can't this mean 吐き気がする too? if so, then "bad feeling" wasn't all off
the cause of 気持ち悪い is not always external like the current glosses imply

気持ち悪い	1486843	96.0%
気持ちわるい	23671	1.5%
キモチワルイ	34939	2.3%
気もち悪い	543	0.0%
気もちわるい	199	0.0%
気持ちワルイ	2336	0.2%

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>気持ちわるい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

usually I remove [yoji] tags, but here I think I will add one

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Trimming. I don't think the extra stuff is needed.

@@ -15,2 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>sleep four hours and pass, sleep five hours and fail (nightly sleep when cramming for university entrance exams)</gloss>
-<gloss>four-pass, five-fail</gloss>
+<gloss>sleep four hours and pass, sleep five hours and fail (when cramming for university entrance exams)</gloss>

Better wording

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>sleep four hours pass, sleep five hours fail (cramming for university entrance exams)</gloss>
+<gloss>sleep four hours and pass, sleep five hours and fail (nightly sleep when cramming for university entrance exams)</gloss>

I think it can stay. Wehave related ones such as ちらっと見る, 
and it's useful for the reverse direction.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2218820">ちらっと見る</xref>

is this entry needed at all?  the entry for じろり seems to be enough

gg5
daijr/s: "鋭い目つきで..."

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>to throw a glance</gloss>
+<gloss>to cast a sharp glance</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijs, nc
142k hits for "やぶさかでない"
15k hits for "吝かでない", 5k hits for "吝かで無い"

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>吝かで無い</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

GG5

詳らか	16421
審らか	796
つまびらか	23265

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5, prog, daij

"Clear" is a better translation in cases like "生死のほどは詳らかでない" and "真相をつまびらかにする".

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つばひらか</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>clear</gloss>

Entry created

the reference says that ギルト債 is 'gilt-edged security'

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/英国債

Also, the name of a women's fashion store (ウィメンズ ストア), which seems to be the most common use of the term.

@@ -8,0 +9,7 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1582210">鍍金・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1243130">金箔</xref>
+<gloss>gilt</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>gilt-edged security</gloss>

Entry created

>the reference says that ギルト債 is 'gilt-edged security'

From Wikipedia: "英語ではgiltもしくはgilt-edged securityと呼ばれ、日本語でギルトもしくはギルト債とも呼ばれる。" So both.

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>gilt-edged security</gloss>
+<gloss>gilt</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833101">サバイバーズギルト</xref>
+<gloss>guilt</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

probably not needed?

Usual English. Should mention be made of golf, etc?

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>downswing</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダウン・スイング</reb>

Entry created

I don't think this x-ref is necessary.

@@ -21,3 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1537970">役・やく・3</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么九</keb>

http://www.niigatakmj.com/1hannyaku.htm

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断公九</keb>
@@ -19 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no end tiles or honor tiles</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>all simples (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>all simples</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>(spoken) line (in a play, film, comic, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(spoken) line (in a play, film, etc.)</gloss>

Tidy-up.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1574850">鯔・ぼら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1574850">ボラ・1</xref>
@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1577270">せりふ・1</xref>
-<gloss>speech</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577270">科白・1</xref>
+<gloss>(spoken) line (in a play, film, comic, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +37,7 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1120030">白耳義・ベルギー</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>Belgium</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -42,9 +48,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1120030">ベルギー</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>Belgium</gloss>

Usually used when listing all the yaku a hand has.
I do not know whether the pronunciation しろ is used the same, or whether it refers to the tile only.
It is not as common in any case.

@@ -31,0 +32,5 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>winning hand with a pung (or kong) of white dragon tiles</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

FWIW 么 only arrived in the JIS standards recently.
I'll align the tan'yao in the メンタンピン entry.

断么 is in daijr/s; I shouldn't have added [sK]

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>
@@ -13,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>断么</keb>

http://mahjong-europe.org/portal/images/docs/Riichi-rules-2016-EN.pdf
  'Tanyao (All Simples) can be an open hand'
https://yakuza.fandom.com/wiki/Mahjong
  'All Simples / Tanyao'
https://riichi.wiki/Tanyao
  'Tanyao 「断么九」 or 「断幺九」 is a yaku, consisting of ...'


〈断／たん／タン〉〈やお／ヤオ／公／幺／么〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 断ヤオ　 │  1,510 │ 10.0% │
│ 断公　　 │    625 │  4.1% │
│ 断幺　　 │    348 │  2.3% │
│ たん公　 │     33 │  0.2% │
│ タンヤオ │ 11,571 │ 76.4% │
│ たんやお │    936 │  6.2% │
│ タンやお │    114 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think "tanyao" (without the apostrophe) is okay. That is how it is almost always written in translated video games, English-language documents and wikis (other than Wikipedia), online discussions, etc.

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+<keb>断公</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断幺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Drafting a change to have "tanyao" as a gloss, as discussed in entry 2753060.
If it's approved, 2749690・断ヤオ九 needs to be aligned.
I see in some entries we use "tan'yao". We should perhaps settle on one or the other.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>tanyao (winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles</gloss>

I think we can handle that odd kanji now.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>

@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>winning hand with a pung (or kong) of red dragon tiles</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>red dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>red dragon tile</gloss>

nikk, daijs entry for 紅中, enwiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong_tiles

ok.

yes, this is clearly sense 8 of our entry for 置く
--
gg5's similar example in 措く is the following, which clearly doesn't match this usage:
今日をおいては二度とチャンスは来ない.　If we don't do it today there'll never be another chance. ｜ Today is the only chance we'll get.
--
not idiomatic, so i think we can do without it altogether

I'm really confused by this entry.
Surely the verb is 置く, not 措く? Literally means "to place/leave time".
In most contexts it means "wait". Standard example: "同期に失敗しました。しばらく時間をおいてから再度お試しください".
Also, noun glosses look really strange. I would change the headword to 時間をおく.

Better xref.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1643550">措いて・おいて</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136880">を措いて・をおいて</xref>

This gloss has been suggested by some translators.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>kit containing cotton swabs, wipes, etc., provided by hotels</gloss>
+<gloss>amenity kit</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">kit containing cotton swabs, wipes, etc., provided by hotels</gloss>

200k+ Googits, e.g. https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/コットン+綿棒+セット+ホテル/

gg5 wiki

wiki

wiki

gg5 wiki(https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アポロ司令・機械船)

eij

does not have its own page in wiki

wiki

Thanks. I thought that was the position. I'm not sure it 
matters that much, but it's cleaner. It gets messy when 
there are multiple kanji-part forms.

In a discussion on entry 1960440, it was agreed that the nakaguro should be left out of the reading.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>しれい・きかいせん</reb>
+<reb>しれいきかいせん</reb>

dot needs to be in the reading if used.  i see no real evidence of 司令機械船 without the dot (2 hits in the first 5 pages of google hits)

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>司令機械船</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11 +8 @@
-<reb>しれいきかいせん</reb>
+<reb>しれい・きかいせん</reb>