gg5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to lie flat (e.g. on the ground)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Definitely [uk]. According to the refs there's no kanji but へばり付く does get a lot of hits.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to stick to</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger">Energisch</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">energisch</lsource>

Fork

http://www.askul.co.jp/f/special/amenity_goods/

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cotton buds (included in an amenity set)</gloss>
+</sense>

Messy.

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>cotton pads (included in an amenity set)</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>cotton pads (usu. in amenity set)</gloss>
+<gloss>cotton buds</gloss>

http://www.askul.co.jp/f/special/amenity_goods/

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cotton pads (included in an amenity set)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">Conté crayons</lsource>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">Comté (fromage)</lsource>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">Conté</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">Comté</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コンテチーズ

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">Comté</lsource>
+<gloss>Comté (cheese)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1052550">コンティニュイティ</xref>

The JEs have "a continuity" but I don't think it's right.
Splitting on source word.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>continuity (esp. in film-making)</gloss>
-<gloss>script</gloss>
@@ -15,11 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
-<gloss>Conté sticks</gloss>
-<gloss>Conté crayons</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
-<gloss>Comté (cheese)</gloss>

I don't think storyboard(ing)/continuity 
refer to  the same the same thing. I'm not 
100% sure this word means "continuity" in 
Japanese (but I'm sure it does refer to 
storyboarding)

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">Conté</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">Comté</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コンテチーズ

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">Comté</lsource>
+<gloss>Comté (cheese)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sound effects</gloss>
+<gloss>sound effect</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サウンド・エフェクト</reb>

Not a separate sense.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ドライヤー

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hair dryer</gloss>
+</sense>

in my dictionary, but i've never seen it spelled like this

GG5, etc.

Alternative (米語?) spelling.

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<gloss>drier</gloss>

Not a separate sense.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ドライヤー

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hair dryer</gloss>
+</sense>

in my dictionary, but i've never seen it spelled like this

GG5, etc.

Alternative (米語?) spelling.

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<gloss>drier</gloss>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/同時発音数

例えば同時発音数が128音である場合は128ポリといった言い方をすることがある。

@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<field>&music;</field>
+<gloss>polyphonic</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>(production) lot or batch</gloss>
+<gloss>lot (production)</gloss>
+<gloss>batch</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ロット管理

When reading this entry, I was unsure whether this referred 
to auction lots or production lots. In context, I have 
found it referring to production lots/volume/batches - the 
number of items in a production run, essentially. I am 
unsure whether the auction reading also applies.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>lot</gloss>
+<gloss>(production) lot or batch</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Merging proposed 2827099 (lotto).

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロト</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロットー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -7,0 +14,2 @@
+<stagr>ロット</stagr>
+<stagr>ロト</stagr>
@@ -10,0 +19,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lotto</gloss>
+</sense>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daijr

Nothing about "flying" in the definition.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&zool;</field>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>growing wings and flying</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>growing wings</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/羽化

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>eclosion</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 汚泥　 │ 253,670 │ 99.0% │
│ 淤泥　 │     276 │  0.1% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo, nikk)
│ おでい │   2,287 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>淤泥</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I wouldn't bother.

daijs - has 3 senses. Should "(industrial) sludge" be a separate sense from "slime; dregs; mire"? ("汚いどろ" in daijs)

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hopeless situation</gloss>
+<gloss>hell</gloss>
+<gloss>despair</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, etc.

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>dirty mud</gloss>
+<gloss>slime</gloss>
+<gloss>dregs</gloss>
+<gloss>mire</gloss>

下世話	71919	  
下世話な	49806	  
下世話に	4533

The JEs all use 下世話に言う as an example, but 下世話な is far more common.

meikyo 2e: ②低俗であること。「━な興味［話］」

@@ -15,0 +16,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>vulgar</gloss>
+<gloss>lowbrow</gloss>
+<gloss>indecent</gloss>

Yes, misleading.

gg5, prog, daij

I think "juicy" comes from eij but it looks wrong to me.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>common phrase</gloss>
-<gloss>juicy (story)</gloss>
+<gloss>everyday talk</gloss>
+<gloss>common parlance</gloss>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>agglomerated</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>aggregated</gloss>
+<gloss>agglomerated</gloss>

eij

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>block-like</gloss>

GG5, etc.

eij

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>seafloor</gloss>
+<gloss>seabed</gloss>

Daijr

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うなぞこ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Oops

@@ -25,7 +25,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2547290">海底撈月・はいていらおゆえ</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>Haitei winning hand in mahjong</gloss>
-<gloss>winning on the last tile drawn from the wall</gloss>
-</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 気の毒　 │ 861,072 │ 99.5% │
│ 気のどく │   1,184 │  0.1% │ - sK
│ きのどく │   2,905 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -24 +24,9 @@
-<gloss>(a) pity</gloss>
+<gloss>poor</gloss>
+<gloss>miserable</gloss>
+<gloss>wretched</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unpardonable</gloss>
+<gloss>regrettable</gloss>

see 2680530

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>気のどく</keb>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't think "sound effect" should go first.
Can't find any examples of [adj-no] usage.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>imitative sound (in film, theatre, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>imitative sounds (drama, broadcasting)</gloss>

daijs, Luminous, 研究社 新和英中辞典

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>sound effect</gloss>

daij, gg5
G n-grams
久しい	256562
久しく	315216

Agreed. I don't even think we need the note. Of the seven GG5 examples, only one is in that form.
The most popular form is 久しく ("for a long time"), which I think is worth adding as a separate entry. The meaning isn't always immediately obvious from these glosses.

@@ -18,3 +18 @@
-<s_inf>often ~て久しい</s_inf>
-<gloss>long (time)</gloss>
-<gloss>long-continued</gloss>
+<gloss>long (time that has passed)</gloss>

3 of the 5 sentences use this form. I think it's a usage matter rather than a separate 
sense.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>often ~て久しい</s_inf>
@@ -22,5 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<gloss>(after て form) long time since</gloss>
-<gloss>for a long time</gloss>
-</sense>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=久しい

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>(after て form) long time since</gloss>
+<gloss>for a long time</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>long</gloss>
+<gloss>long (time)</gloss>

gg5

Added sense.

@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+<gloss>peak</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>end</gloss>
+<gloss>limit</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to show respect</gloss>
+<gloss>to show respect for</gloss>
+<gloss>to revere</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>to worship</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold in esteem</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

I don't think it's necessary to have separate [adj-no] sense. 激動の時代 is just "an age of turmoil".

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>terrible shock</gloss>
+<gloss>violent shock</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>turbulence</gloss>
+<gloss>turmoil</gloss>
@@ -22,5 +24 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>tumultuous</gloss>
-<gloss>turbulent</gloss>
+<gloss>excitement</gloss>

GG5

The noun would have to be "tumult", but that's about the sound a crowd makes rather than the actual upheaval.
GG5 has "tumultuous" for 激動の.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +22,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>turbulent</gloss>

eij

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>tumultuous</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

Trying to make the meaning a little clearer.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>concentration</gloss>
+<gloss>concentration (of efforts, forces, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>gathering together</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>marshalling</gloss>

eij

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>mobilization</gloss>

gg5, prog, 中辞典, daij

Added sense. Split sense 1.
Only daijr has 3 senses but I think this works well.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>collateral</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18,6 @@
+<gloss>repayment</gloss>
+<gloss>something done or given in return</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>collateral</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>quid pro quo</gloss>
-<gloss>return</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>turning to look behind</gloss>

GG5, etc.

eij

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>return</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>security</gloss>
+<gloss>quid pro quo</gloss>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>sound effects</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5, etc.

No, and I don't think "initiative" works very well. No published JE has it.

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>initiative</gloss>
+<gloss>vision</gloss>
+<gloss>scheme</gloss>

eij

two senses?

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>initiative</gloss>

daij, gg5,

Splitting.

@@ -21 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>rough</gloss>
+<gloss>wild</gloss>
+<gloss>violent</gloss>
+<gloss>rough-mannered</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +26,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>rough (e.g. work)</gloss>
+<gloss>crude</gloss>
+<gloss>coarse</gloss>
+<gloss>careless</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr: "鉄道・道路・橋・ワイヤーなどが，地上高くかけ渡されている"

Does not refer to the structure itself.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,3 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>overhead structure</gloss>
-<gloss>elevated structure</gloss>
+<gloss>elevated (structure)</gloss>
+<gloss>overhead</gloss>

GG5

eij

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>elevated structure</gloss>

GG5, etc. (some split)

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>reproduction</gloss>
+<gloss>reemergence</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>reproduction</gloss>

eij

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>reenactment</gloss>
+<gloss>recreation</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1309770">指向</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1309770">指向・1</xref>

eij

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>orientation (towards a goal)</gloss>

prog, ALC

Just happened across 本物志向, and I think "preference" makes it clearer in cases like that and ブランド志向.

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>preference (for)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

That seems an Eijiro oddity.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>self-imposition</gloss>
+<gloss>self-reliance</gloss>

eij

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>self-imposition</gloss>

While "eliminate' is not wrong here, it's a bit of an outlier as it has a lot of connotations which don't apply to 取り除く. I think the entry is better off without it.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>to eliminate</gloss>

eij

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>to eliminate</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取りのぞく</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I think it's really 受託手荷物. I can't see 受託 alone working as that.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>checked/stowed (baggage)</gloss>

http://www.jetstar.com/jp/ja/help/articles/checked-baggage

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>checked/stowed (baggage)</gloss>

Agreed.

Needed? We'd normally only have an XXした entry when it its meaning was not directly discernable from that of XX. In this case: "fullness; completion; perfection" is pretty obvious.

eij
http://wadoku.de/search/充実した

充実した生活

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>fullfilling</gloss>

OK I'll set that up.

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>先見の目</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Given that 目 and 明 are different words (with different readings), I don't think it should be included here. 
I'd make it a separate entry with a "non-standard variant of 先見の明" note.

My first thought was that it should be in its own entry, but after looking at it more closely and reading the discussions I think it's best included here as sK.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>先見の目</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

meikyo: 「先見の目」は誤り。

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 先見の明　　　 │ 54,571 │ 86.1% │
│ 先見の目　　　 │  7,834 │ 12.4% │
│ 先見の眼　　　 │    860 │  1.4% │
│ せんけんのめい │    110 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I suppose the reading would be め rather than めい.
Could either go in a new entry or this entry as [sK]

gg5, prog, Wisdom

None of my JEs have "sailing".

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>sea voyage</gloss>
+<gloss>sea trip</gloss>
+<gloss>voyage</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>sailing</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>sea voyage</gloss>
+<gloss>cruise</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>sailing</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/単音

This is the most accurate translation, in my view. Surprised GG5 doesn't have it.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>phone</gloss>

A week and no comment. I'm dropping that sense.

@@ -22,6 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2827496">重音・2</xref>
-<field>&music;</field>
-<gloss>monophonic (instrument)</gloss>
-</sense>

I think that sense 3 is over-interpreting it. It's covered by the other senses. Comment anyone else?

eij
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/重音奏法
http://pianoman-meichan.at.webry.info/200601/article_7.html

1) 単音楽器（主として同時にひとつの音だけを演奏する楽器）

2) 単音　＝　モノフォニック（ＭＯＮＯＰＨＯＮＩＣ）
   重音　＝　ポリフォニック（ＰＯＬＹＰＨＯＮＩＣ）

beware, i didn't find proper information on how to distinguish from 2nd entry. but 複音/重音 do imply there is a difference..

@@ -21,0 +22,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827496">重音・2</xref>
+<field>&music;</field>
+<gloss>monophonic (instrument)</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

By itself it doesn't refer to gear.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>low gear</gloss>
+<gloss>low speed</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>low-speed</gloss>
-<gloss>low-velocity</gloss>

eij

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>low-speed</gloss>
+<gloss>low-velocity</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>aptness</gloss>

eij

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>suitability</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>passage</gloss>

eij

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>travelling</gloss>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>having poor (radio, etc.) reception</gloss>
+<gloss>having poor reception (radio, etc.)</gloss>

prog, meikyo, etc.

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>having poor (radio, etc.) reception</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>

eij

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>hearing loss</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>dual citizenship</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

Noun glosses.

@@ -20,5 +20,4 @@
-<gloss>incident to</gloss>
-<gloss>attaching to</gloss>
-<gloss>annexed to</gloss>
-<gloss>concomitant</gloss>
-<gloss>attending</gloss>
+<gloss>being incident to</gloss>
+<gloss>being accompanied by</gloss>
+<gloss>being collateral with</gloss>
+<gloss>being attached to</gloss>

joyo kanji

@@ -11,1 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

eijiro sorts glosses alphabetically, so definitely not

GG5: 〔再興〕 (a) revival; (a) resuscitation; (a) resurgence; (a) restoration; (a) rehabilitation; a comeback; 〔再建〕 (a) reconstruction
中辞典:〈再興〉 (a) revival; restoration; rehabilitation; (a) renaissance (特に文芸の); 〈再建〉 reconstruction
ルミナス: (破壊などからの) reconstruction [U]; (失われたものを取り戻すこと) recovery [U]. 《指記号さいけん1》.

The major JEs are not "overwhelmingly "reconstruction"". Should they be trumped by Eijiro? I suspect not.

eij

overwhelmingly "reconstruction". i've not yet considered ordering glosses, but this has been bugging me for quite a while.
i will pay extra attention for it if the policy is to order by frequency more or less.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>reconstruction</gloss>
+<gloss>restoration</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>reconstruction</gloss>
-<gloss>restoration</gloss>

eij 新和英中辞典

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>restoration</gloss>

prog, ウィズダム和英辞典
抵抗運動の母体 - the basis of the resistance.
彼らのグループがその運動の母体となっている - Their group forms the nucleus of the movement.

Don't agree with "heartland".
Neither sense is [adj-no].

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>mother's body, esp. when pregnant or after giving birth</gloss>
+<gloss>mother's body (esp. when pregnant or after giving birth)</gloss>
@@ -21 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>heartland</gloss>
+<gloss>base</gloss>
+<gloss>basis</gloss>
+<gloss>nucleus</gloss>

Only in limited contexts. Not suitable as a general gloss.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>maternal</gloss>

eij

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>maternal</gloss>

eij

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>encompassing</gloss>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>inclusive</gloss>

daijr/s, chujiten

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜の亡者</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜の亡者</s_inf>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>person with a blind lust (for)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>obsessed person (money, power, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>person who is obsessed (with money, power, etc.)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>obssessed person (usu. with money)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. 〜の亡者</s_inf>
+<gloss>obsessed person (money, power, etc.)</gloss>

Not needed.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>person with a blind lust (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>person with a blind lust (for ...)</gloss>

daijr/s, chujiten

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜の亡者</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜の亡者</s_inf>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>person with a blind lust (for)</gloss>

I suspect it actually came from confusion with 相反する/あいはんする.

RP, eij, daij

If no other ref has this as vs, I think it's best to drop the tag. We don't want people confusing this with 相反する(あいはんする).

@@ -12,5 +12,8 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>inversion</gloss>
-<gloss>opposition</gloss>
-<gloss>conflicting</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual opposition</gloss>
+<gloss>contrariety</gloss>
+<gloss>contradiction</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2856861">相引</xref>
+<field>&genet;</field>
@@ -18 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>contradiction</gloss>

sankoku 7e says [vi], although I don't see [vs] in any other ref

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think that's right. We have entries for 相反性, 相反則不軌, 相反定理, 相反的.
相反する is 相 + 反する, not 相反 + する.

@@ -19,4 +18,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>reciprocity</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5, prog

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>to run counter to</gloss>
-<gloss>to conflict</gloss>
-<gloss>to contravene</gloss>
+<gloss>to run counter (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to conflict (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to disagree (with)</gloss>

all dictionaries have as 相反する, because it is parsed as 相-反する, not 相反-する

just saw the different reading, compared to entry 相反..
however, couldn't the entries be merged?

〈区／區〉〈画／劃／畫〉

區畫	113

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>區畫</keb>

We can hide the kyuuji form of 区

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

meikyo

区画	1284962
区劃	1309
區劃	337

or oK?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:
区劃	1309
區劃	337

Please provide sources.
区劃 is in the dictionaries. It should be not be removed.
區劃 is not in the refs but 區 is an 異体字 so this is a valid form.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>区劃</keb>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>区劃</keb>
+<keb>區劃</keb>

gg5, prog

Not adj-no.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>presage</gloss>
+<gloss>harbinger</gloss>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>harbinger</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>foreboding</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
364,806	 98.3%	前兆
    265	  0.1%	前徴
  6,006	  1.6%	ぜんちょう

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc.

I don't think "prognostication" is quite right.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>prognostication</gloss>
+<gloss>presentiment</gloss>

eij

@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>precursor</gloss>
+<gloss>prognostication</gloss>

[vi]: shinmeikai, oukoku, meikyo

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 膨大　　 │ 1,450,436 │ 98.1% │
│ 厖大　　 │    25,998 │  1.8% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 尨大　　 │     1,554 │  0.1% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s)
│ ぼうだい │     2,998 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

i agree.  countable vs non-countable

@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>multitudinous</gloss>

eij

i'd argue against "multitudinous". there are lots of hits of "膨大な数" in eij alone.
thus my guess is that the current definition is partly redundant.
added "large".

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>large</gloss>

chujiten

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>misconception</gloss>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<gloss>misconception</gloss>
+<gloss>wrong idea</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,5 +24,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>to be mistaken</gloss>
-<gloss>to have the wrong idea</gloss>

eij

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>misconception</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>antithesis</gloss>

eij

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>contraposition</gloss>
+<gloss>counterposing</gloss>

GG5: 	fanciful; visionary; imaginary; Utopian; quixotic

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>visionary</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>quixotic</gloss>
+<gloss>fanciful</gloss>

eij

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>fantastical</gloss>
+<gloss>utopian</gloss>

wiki: "A mediterranean sea"

if a more general adjective, perhaps no capital, although my dictionary has one

daij, koj
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_sea_(oceanography)

Added sense.
I don't think we need an adj-no "mediterranean" sense.

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>mediterranean</gloss>
+<gloss>Mediterranean sea (oceanography)</gloss>

eij

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>mediterranean</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5

"motorized" could mean non-electrical.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>electric</gloss>
-<gloss>motorized</gloss>
+<gloss>electric powered</gloss>

eij

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>motorized</gloss>

I think this is a typo for ガングロ, which is already an entry. I've proposed merging it here.

こんな書き方見たことないですけど「ガングロ」と同じでしょう

Me too.

I'm puzzled by this gloss.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>example of onomatopoeia</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>time-division</gloss>
+<gloss>time-division (e.g. multiplexing)</gloss>

eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>time-division</gloss>

Entry created

not from the name of a place (see mailing list discussion)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Mozzarella (cheese)</gloss>
+<gloss>mozzarella (cheese)</gloss>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<field>&food;</field>
@@ -17 +16 @@
-<gloss>mozzarella (cheese)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mozzarella (cheese)</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>mozzarella</gloss>
+<gloss>mozzarella (cheese)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>

eij

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>sense of contentment</gloss>

Entry created

You're right; having the tag on マスカルポーネ itself is enough.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>

"mascarpone" is Italian, but is "mascarpone cheese" Italian? How do we handle this kind of mixed phrases?

Wikip: "The name is popularly held to derive from mascarpa, an unrelated milk product made from the whey of stracchino (a young, barely aged cheese), or from mascarpia, a word in the local dialect for ricotta."

I didn't see the mailing list post.
OK so lets keep the entry.
But should it really be [lsrc=ita:]?

do  we use the lsrc tag when it is only partially from Italian?
---
yes, it's in Daijs, but do we really need it?
We already have マスカルポーネ as a separate entry

See 2833260.

@@ -25,0 +26,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>fu</gloss>
+<gloss>unit used in calculation of a hand's score</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daij, gg5

No, "polyphonic(s)" is something else.

1. http://pianoman-meichan.at.webry.info/200601/article_7.html
2. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/重音奏法
3. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ポリフォニックシンセサイザー

there doesn't seem to be 重音楽器 wheras 単音楽器 seems to be in use, although i'm not sure 単音楽器 is lexically accepted.
重音 can also be produced with 単音楽器 (e.g. flute, violins, vocally see 2.) but the characteristic of the instrument seems to be denoted by ポリフォニック (see 3.).
重音 is the acoustic result of playing an instrument in a way to produce several sounds at the same time, so it's not "strange", imho.
i'm not sure the term polyphonics applies to what multiphonics denotes, so i'm not changing it.
i drafted a reference pointing from 単音. not sure if it holds.

?

I overlooked this sense. In sense 2 it's the the effect you can get with a flute which sounds a bit strange but some modern composers call for it.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>double-stopping</gloss>
+<gloss>double-stopping (string instr.)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>multiphonics (e.g. wind instr.)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>banon (French goat cheese)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<gloss>Banon (cheese)</gloss>

readersplus https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOCチーズの一覧

http://www.weblio.jp/content/積み棒
http://ma-jyan.itomenako.info/d/tumibou.html

Next non-dealer winner receives them.

http://www.weblio.jp/content/親家

http://www.weblio.jp/content/子家

http://mahjong.us.com/JPML.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Mahjong_scoring_rules#Counting_han
"A player’s hand value is based on the traditional formula, where the hand’s basic value, its fu, is doubled once for every fan. Only the winning hand is scored."

The English-language guides call it "han" or "fan".

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>double</gloss>
-<gloss>unit used in calculation of a hand's score</gloss>
+<gloss>han</gloss>
+<gloss>fan</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">unit that doubles the score of a hand</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Mahjong_scoring_rules

Added one easy-to-read reference.

http://www.maru-jan.com/game/tensu.html
http://majandofu.com/rule-score-hansu

I am having a hard time finding easy-to-read references for this.
There are two units in a mahjong hand's score: the fu and the han.
Each yaku in the hand has a han value, which are summed together to get the hand's final han value.
If han value is < 5, the formula is fu * 2 ^ (han + 2), rounded up to the nearest 100 points.
If han value >= 5, the hand is worth mangan / haneman / baiman etc. points.
This value is not quite the final score, but depends on the method of win (tsumo or ron) and the player (east or not).
It is generally multiplied by 4 or 6 depending on those two factors.
Most people just use a chart for this.

See also entries 1915790 and 2754210.

I don't think a separate vs sense is needed here.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>inclusion</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -17,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to include</gloss>
-<gloss>to comprise</gloss>
+<gloss>inclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>containing</gloss>

daijr 「北は…より，南は…に至るまでを―する事が出来た／肉弾『忠温』」

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I agree about "vs" glosses.

リーダーズ+プラス

https://kotobank.jp/word/包有物-782252

Eijiro

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>economic entity</gloss>

wiki gg5

Apparently comprises people in some theories according to wiki.

GG5

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>レバレッジド・バイアウト</reb>
+<reb>レバレッジドバイアウト</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>レバレッジドバイアウト</reb>
+<reb>レバレッジド・バイアウト</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>LBO</gloss>

wiki

I've put in a proposal for 小獣. This suggestion is a mess.

http://www.weblio.jp/content/小獣