mk

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr/s

No need for a separate [vs] sense.
But I do think it's worth having a separate [physics] sense to clarify that it refers to the process rather than the water itself.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>condensation</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>condensation (of ideas, emotions, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>to condense (steam, ideas, emotions, etc.)</gloss>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>condensation (of a vapour or gas)</gloss>

gg5, daijr/s, etc.

Added sense.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1241450">琴・こと・1</xref>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>koto string</gloss>
+</sense>

saw it written this way

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喧々ごうごう</keb>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

daijr/s, gg5

I think the explanatory gloss is enough. Having "drizzle" implies this is a synonym of 霧雨.

@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>drizzle</gloss>
-<gloss>shower in late autumn (fall) or early winter</gloss>
+<gloss>rain shower in late autumn (fall) or early winter</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

should perhaps be kept apart

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +24,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>じう</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>seasonable rain</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog

I think we can simplify sense 2.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>relying upon others for attaining one's own objective</gloss>
+<gloss>relying on others</gloss>
+<gloss>depending on others</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

[rare] can be used for a single sense but in most cases another tag is more appropriate. I think this sense is either [dated] or [obs]. GG5 has it but daijs's example is from 1877.
I don't think the 退学処分 x-ref is needed. It's not interchangeable with 退学.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1779190">退学処分</xref>

[rare] is more for the whole entry.

@@ -35,2 +35,2 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course of study</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/退学

退学	280974	92.8%
退学処分	21756	7.2%

退学 alone　is predominantly [1]
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/退学

*lots* of glosses and circumstances, none of them are [3].
「退学」は英語で何という？退学方法で変わる表現を確認しよう！
https://nativecamp.net/blog/20230510-leave_school

eijiro has two pages of collocations, none look like [3]
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=退学

処分 = "punishment" nuance here,I think. it is the example in sankoku's 退学 entry. On reverso, 退学 is predominantly [1], 退学処分 is unambiguous.

sankoku does not give [3] at all, says explicitly 途中でやめ. Wikipedia also says 卒業・修了を待たずに学校を途中でやめること

[3] seems like it would be an uncommon usage, given the nuance involved in [1] and [2]. Also, dropped from modern dictionary (sankoku). It's obviously literally correct for A+B reasons, 退+学, but unlikely to be common in this day and age. (marking [rare] or [hist] or [dated] explains that 退学 is not as ambiguous as the 3 senses might otherwise indicate).

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1779190">退学処分</xref>
@@ -34 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course of study</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>withdrawing from school</gloss>
+<gloss>withdrawal from school</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>class with</gloss>
-<gloss>put on par with</gloss>
-<gloss>regard in the same light as</gloss>
-<gloss>equate</gloss>
+<gloss>viewing and treating as one</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as the same</gloss>
+<gloss>equating one thing with another</gloss>
+<gloss>identification</gloss>

eij

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>equate</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

披瀝 appears to be the more popular form. 披歴 is not in the refs.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>披歴</keb>
+<keb>披瀝</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>披瀝</keb>
+<keb>披歴</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>express one's opinion</gloss>
+<gloss>expressing one's opinion</gloss>
+<gloss>speaking one's mind</gloss>
@@ -25 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>stating</gloss>

gg5, prog, ルミナス, wisdom

"sweet" isn't in any of my refs. Dropping it.
All the JEs lead with "good" or "nice" for sense 1. Translating おいしい as "delicious" in all situations is a common mistake made by Japanese learners of English.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>good(-tasting)</gloss>
+<gloss>nice</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>sweet</gloss>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>attractive</gloss>
+<gloss>attractive (offer, opportunity, etc.)</gloss>

I agree.

美味しい	25444440
おいしい	26182073
オイシイ	370401

less than 1% of total. I don\t think it's needed. It's clutter

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>オイシイ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

Resubmit with references and a case for that change.

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>describing an enjoyable eating experience</gloss>
+<gloss>delicious</gloss>
+<gloss>tasty</gloss>
+<gloss>sweet</gloss>

藪をつついて蛇	2008	80.1% nikk, gakkoku, meikyo,daijs
薮をつついて蛇	148	5.9%
藪を突いて蛇	145	5.8%
薮を突いて蛇	29	1.2%
やぶをつついてへび	178	7.1%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +13 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>薮を突いて蛇を出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Both are OK.

if 藪 is a bush, shouldn't it be "poking at the bush" rather than "poking at the brush"?

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1538540">やぶ蛇</xref>
@@ -25 +24 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">to scare out a snake by poking at the brush</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to scare out a snake by poking at the bush</gloss>

googits

藪 forms are far more common.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>藪をつついて蛇を出す</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>藪をつついて蛇を出す</keb>
+<keb>藪を突いて蛇を出す</keb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>藪を突いて蛇を出す</keb>

Added kanji for つつく

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>薮を突いて蛇を出す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>藪を突いて蛇を出す</keb>

regarding [rK] - we should probably add to the documentation somewhere that one of the things we look when deciding whether to use it is the ngram percentages and that the threshold is around 2-3% (before we forget it ourselves)

Eijiro

I don't think it is a problem. These 四字熟語 don't usually have literal meanings.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>hard-bitten</gloss>

The "rich in experience" is not a really accurate translation so I added another one to make it clearer and closer to the meaning and easier to find.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>very experienced</gloss>

Not quite. I think everything we've tagged as rK so far has been <3%.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
百戦錬磨	61990
百戦練磨	3894
ひゃくせんれんま	160

6% of total usages. meets the threshold for rK?

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Merging with 2832666.

This appears to have the same reading as the x-ref (i.e., with the の)

https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yoji/350.html?getdata=鶏群一鶴
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/鶏群一鶴/

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>けいぐんいっかく</reb>
+<reb>けいぐんのいっかく</reb>

See comment in 2832666.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2832666">鶏群の一鶴・けいぐんのいっかく</xref>

Entry created

Unidic, Goitaikei

http://www.kanjipedia.jp/kotoba/0000429800
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/謁#Japanese
~100 google hits

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>謁える</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

all kokugos split the senses, as does prog for senses 1&2

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to meet (humble)</gloss>
-<gloss>to face</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet</gloss>
+<gloss>to see</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +21,7 @@
-<gloss>to act as a wife for</gloss>
+<gloss>to face (an enemy)</gloss>
+<gloss>to confront</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to serve (esp. as one's wife)</gloss>

it simply isn't true that it is usually written in kana.  there are a huge number of words in the dictionary (and in Japanese in general) that share a headword with another term and therefore require some disambiguation on the part of the writer or reader.  to say that they are "usually written in kana" when they are not is to make the [uk] tag meaningless
=
Use the "Restrict to common words" option.

daijr "〔「と言えば」の転。話し言葉でのくだけた言い方に用いられ
る。「ん」で終わる語に付く場合以外は、すべて「ってば」の形をと
る〕"

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>indicates emotional closeness or annoyance with someone</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>indicates emotional closeness or annoyance with someone</s_inf>
+<gloss>speaking of</gloss>
@@ -16 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>indicates annoyance (in sentence-final position)</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>indicates annoyance (in sentence-final position)</s_inf>
+<gloss>(I told you) already</gloss>
+<gloss>come on</gloss>

GG5 seems to agree.

OK

daijr, daijs, koj

Sentence-final usage isn't restricted to commands, e.g. 「もういいって
ば！」

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>indicates an indirect command by expressing annoyance (in sentence-final position)</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates annoyance (in sentence-final position)</gloss>

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -18 +17 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

OK, split.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>いっそうの事</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -23,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いっそうのこと</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://study-z.net/100173751 
いっそのこと	441,699	97.8%	
いっそうのこと	10,115	2.2%

The above article has いっそうのこと as the reading for 一層の事.
How often, if at all, is 一層 read as いっそ in this expression? My IME doesn't even suggest 一層 for いっそ.  We removed all mention of 一層 from the いっそ entry (see my comment there). 
If 一層のこと is always read いっそうのこと, I suggest splitting out 一層の事/いっそうのこと into a separate entry with a "non-standard var. of いっそのこと" note.

一層の事【いっそのこと】 is in daijirin. I think it's better to have that form be visible than 一層のこと because the difference with いっその事 is easier to quickly observe.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<keb>一層のこと</keb>
+<keb>一層の事</keb>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<keb>一層の事</keb>
+<keb>一層のこと</keb>

いっその事	74860	13.9%
一層のこと	5036	0.9%
一層の事	2236	0.4%
いっそうの事	4750	0.9%
いっそのこと	441699	82.0%
いっそうのこと	10115	1.9%
Koj, Daijs, etc. only have いっその事, Jitsuyo and Wiktionary have 一層.

Major simplification. I'm only suggesting [rK] for 一層のこと because it's in Jitsuyo, but I think 一層 here is close to being a 変換ミス. I'd be happy to hide it.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +18 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,3 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>いっその事</re_restr>
-<re_restr>一層のこと</re_restr>
-<re_restr>一層の事</re_restr>
@@ -27,4 +26 @@
-<re_restr>一層のこと</re_restr>
-<re_restr>一層の事</re_restr>
-<re_restr>いっそうの事</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijr/s, prog

I think this is clearer.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>wale</gloss>
+<gloss>wale (on the skin)</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>weal</gloss>

yikes

ngrams, WWW hits, GG5

@@ -5,0 +5,9 @@
+<keb>ミミズ腫れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みみず腫れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚯蚓腫れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +16,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みみず脹れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミミズばれ</reb>
+<re_restr>ミミズ腫れ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +25,4 @@
+<re_restr>みみず腫れ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>蚯蚓腫れ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>蚯蚓脹れ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>みみず脹れ</re_restr>

daijg, JWN, Cross, Luminous
n-grams

eij

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>refining</gloss>
-<gloss>elaborating</gloss>
+<gloss>refinement</gloss>
+<gloss>elaboration</gloss>

ブランド用語集
eij

googits

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>産後うつ</keb>

daijs, eij

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>room that it's forbidden to enter</gloss>
+<gloss>room that is forbidden to enter</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あかずの間</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>room that's forbidden to enter</gloss>
-<gloss>a locked room</gloss>
+<gloss>room that it's forbidden to enter</gloss>
+<gloss>locked room</gloss>
+<gloss>unopened room</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/開かずの間-422660

Corsican grape variety
see comments under 2832585

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>

many www hits

Corsica

鵜のみにする 3k
(鵜飲みにする"　500)

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鵜のみにする</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

You're right. It was a typo. Thanks.

Did I misunderstand or should that be "to accept without questioning" 
rather than "with"?

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>to accept with questioning</gloss>
+<gloss>to accept without questioning</gloss>

This means "scheduled for release".
Although very common, it's A+B; 予定 can follow all sorts of nouns and there's nothing particularly noteworthy about this combination.
Not in any of the major refs.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/発売予%E
5%AE%9A

gg5

daijr, daijs

koj

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1248830">軍馬</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>war horse</gloss>
+<gloss>warhorse</gloss>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヒアリ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_imported_fire_ant

koj

Not in daijr/s or any of the JEs.

はるのど.

I think this is supposed to read "phase"

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>phrase transition</gloss>
+<gloss>phase transition</gloss>

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/相転移

daijs, daijr

daijr/s

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

daijr, daijs

vs. some other 纂 terms:
纂述	0	0.0%　<----
類纂	1235	0.3%
雑纂	1857	0.5%
簒奪	35109	9.4%
編纂	310406	83.0%

Not in sankoku. 0 ngrams, limited google hits.  [rare] or [form].

Lightly represented in a google book search. In daijs, certainly exists.

Ah, and it's transitive for the material you're writing up. Almost all google book hits for 纂述して are を纂述して。
節制に善きものを纂述して、具に回して來り上れ。

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I think this a more usual English form.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>gathering materials and synthesizing that information into writing</gloss>
+<gloss>gathering and writing up material</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

daijr, daijs

As a policy longish passages like these are OK if they're in a major 国語辞典.

daijr, daijs

See comments on 2044410.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鶏群一鶴</keb>

wtf is invisible character U+200B and how did it get there

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

removed invisible character U+200B

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>a great figure among the common run of men​</gloss>
+<gloss>a great figure among the common run of men</gloss>

http://kotowaza.jitenon.jp/kotowaza/2741.php
10k google hits

Date format

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Vincent van Gogh (03.30.1853-07.29.1890)</gloss>
+<gloss>Vincent van Gogh (1853.03.30-1890.07.29)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/フィンセント・ファン・ゴッホ