GG5

"distance lecture" is not very good English.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>distance lecture</gloss>

eij

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>distance learning</gloss>
+<gloss>distance lecture</gloss>
+<gloss>remote lecture</gloss>

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>meat, fish, vegetables, etc. added to rice or udon (e.g to make gomoku meshi)</gloss>
+<gloss>meat, fish, vegetables, etc. added to rice or udon (e.g. to make gomoku meshi)</gloss>

Agreed.

The "ingredients of " seems unnecessary. I know GG5 words it that way.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>ingredients of meat, fish, vegetables, etc. added to rice or udon (e.g to make gomoku meshi)</gloss>
+<gloss>meat, fish, vegetables, etc. added to rice or udon (e.g to make gomoku meshi)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daijr/s
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/加薬 (Sense 1)
"一般的にはひらがなで表記されることが多い"

Split into senses.
Sense 3 gloss is a bit messy.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>condiments</gloss>
@@ -14 +16,12 @@
-<gloss>adding extra ingredients (med)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>adjuvant (in Chinese medicine)</gloss>
+<gloss>addition of an adjuvant</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1268650">五目飯</xref>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
+<gloss>ingredients of meat, fish, vegetables, etc. added to rice or udon (e.g to make gomoku meshi)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 外堀　　 │ 102,491 │ 87.1% │
│ 外濠　　 │  13,762 │ 11.7% │
│ 外壕　　 │     829 │  0.7% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ そとぼり │     610 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>outer moat (castle)</gloss>
+<gloss>outer moat (of a castle)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5

I don't think "wonderful" is right.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>wonderful</gloss>
+<gloss>queer</gloss>
+<gloss>peculiar</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think this is much neater.
It's helpful to have regular noun glosses for cases like:
"島の帰属をめぐって争う"
"島民は…への帰属を望んでいる"

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>belonging to</gloss>
-<gloss>coming under the jurisdiction of</gloss>
+<gloss>belonging</gloss>
@@ -21 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>imputation (of guilt, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>imputation</gloss>
+<gloss>possession</gloss>
+<gloss>jurisdiction</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>reverting to</gloss>
-<gloss>being returned to</gloss>
-<gloss>being restored to</gloss>
+<gloss>reversion</gloss>
+<gloss>return</gloss>
+<gloss>restoration</gloss>

koj, daij, etc.

clearly two senses

@@ -19,3 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>being returned to</gloss>
-<gloss>reverting to</gloss>
-<gloss>imputation</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +21,8 @@
+<gloss>imputation (of guilt, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>reverting to</gloss>
+<gloss>being returned to</gloss>
+<gloss>being restored to</gloss>

daij gg5 eij

Not the best entry. Tried to improve it.

@@ -18,0 +18,6 @@
+<gloss>coming under the jurisdiction of</gloss>
+<gloss>being returned to</gloss>
+<gloss>reverting to</gloss>
+<gloss>imputation</gloss>
+<gloss>ascription</gloss>
+<gloss>attribution</gloss>

gg5

Helps to have a more literal gloss, I think.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>determination to kill</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>thirst for blood, bloodlust</gloss>
+<gloss>thirst for blood</gloss>
+<gloss>bloodlust</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>thirst for blood</gloss>
+<gloss>thirst for blood, bloodlust</gloss>

gg5, prog, daijr/s

Added senses.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>resolution</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,13 @@
-<gloss>motive</gloss>
+<gloss>ambition</gloss>
+<gloss>aim</gloss>
+<gloss>goal</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>kindness</gloss>
+<gloss>goodwill</gloss>
+<gloss>kind offer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>gift (as a token of gratitude)</gloss>

GG5 (has "bill" in sense 1.)

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>bill</gloss>
@@ -31,4 +31,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>bill</gloss>
-</sense>

eij

@@ -30,0 +31,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>bill</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5 and 中辞典 sense 2. I'm not sure it's distinct from the sumo sense.

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<gloss>handprint</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

prog

Where does "self-sacrificing devotion" come from?
Doesn't match the definition.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>self-sacrificing devotion</gloss>
+<gloss>innocence</gloss>

Ok.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>everybody</gloss>
+<gloss>everyone</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I think it's useful to split the literal meaning from the way it's commonly used.

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<gloss>you (people)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<s_inf>making appeal, etc.</s_inf>

gg5, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -18,2 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>Gentlemen!</gloss>
-<gloss>Ladies!</gloss>
+<gloss>gentlemen</gloss>
+<gloss>ladies and gentlemen</gloss>
+<gloss>my friends</gloss>
+<gloss>everybody</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I think these are all part of the one sense.

@@ -22,3 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>

eij

"一般大衆に心構えをしてもらう - prepare the general public" ([1]) as opposed to
"（人）の心構えを変える - change someone's mental attitude" (proposed [2])

@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mental attitude</gloss>
+<gloss>frame of mind</gloss>
+</sense>

hits

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>心がまえ</keb>

hits

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>dressed up</gloss>
-<gloss>wearing rich clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>dressing up in fine clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>splendid clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>one's best clothes</gloss>

ルミナス too.

I think that's best in its own entry. I have created one.

@@ -61,6 +60,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>そせい</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&ling;</field>
-<gloss>feature</gloss>
-</sense>

daijr

The definition "feature" only applies to 素性 with the reading そせい, but idk how to make that clear.

@@ -60,0 +61,6 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>そせい</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>feature</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, daijr/s

Split into senses.

@@ -47,0 +48,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -50,0 +54,6 @@
+<gloss>past</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>provenance</gloss>
+<gloss>origin</gloss>

Messy.

Daijr has 3 archaic senses. I don't think we need sense 2.

@@ -27,9 +26,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>interior decoration</gloss>
-<gloss>landscaping</gloss>
-<gloss>furnishing</gloss>
-<gloss>ornament</gloss>

nikkoku says that our sense [2] is [vs], but I don't see any evidence for sense [1]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 装束　　 │ 182,342 │
│ 装束する │       0 │
│ 装束して │     103 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Thanks.

151 ngrams

i can't be too fussed one way or the other.  i don't think it really needs to be here or adds much but it's not harmful either.  agree with iK if kept.

I don't mind it going back, but I'd prefer to wait until Rene, Robin, et al. have a chance to comment. It's irregular in that 拐 doesn't have a recognized kun reading of さら.う.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

https://dajare.jp/works/107481/
https://maho.jp/works/16743963567753727653
https://www.no-ichigo.jp/read/page?page_id=25757976

I'd like to propose re-adding 拐う. It's obscure, but it does see use. I've listed some 
references where 拐う is read さらう (and definitely not read かどう, which is archaic). Some 
of these refs have no furigana, which suggests that a native speaker could infer the 
reading, so I think having 拐う in here is valuable.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>拐う</keb>

G n-grams:
謗り	 9678
誹り	 9341
譏り	  564
そしり	23545

reordering

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>譏り</keb>
+<keb>誹り</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>誹り</keb>
+<keb>譏り</keb>

OK. It's amazing that slander/libel is so widely used by JEs. Perhaps they've just copied from each other.

@@ -23,4 +22,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -28,3 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>slander</gloss>
-<gloss>libel</gloss>
-<gloss>calumny</gloss>

i think i agree with Robin.  unless there is a nuance of 'inappropriate' disparagement that kokugos are not picking up

I don't think it's correct to say there are two senses here.
"Slander", "libel", etc. are for the benefit of English learners who might be using そしり in more specific context.

I'm in favour of dropping the sense 2 glosses entirely.
I have a paper JE dictionary (designed for English speakers) on hand and "criticism", "censure" and "blame" are the only glosses listed. Same with prog.

This has been open for over a month. I'm suggesting a sense break, as I previously suggested.

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

chujiten, prog, wisdom

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>museum piece</gloss>

GG5, Eijiro

No need for "adj-no".

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>extremely outmoded</gloss>
+<gloss>relic from an earlier age</gloss>
+<gloss>something extremely outmoded</gloss>

eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5

I don't think "challenging" is quite right either.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>challenging</gloss>
+<gloss>enterprising</gloss>

eij

i don't see "treacherous" contained.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>treacherous</gloss>
+<gloss>challenging</gloss>

Entry created

http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Cross-References

From the editorial policy's section on cross-references:
-----
"Where the reference is to a particular headword/reading combination, use the format: kanji・reading, e.g., [see=金本位・かねほんい]."
-----
So when the kanji form has more than one reading, include the reading.
There are no guidelines on what to do in other cases. 
Some editors use the "kanji・reading" format for all x-refs.
Others (including myself) tend to omit the reading (although sometimes I'll include it if it's unusual or unintuitive). I prefer this approach because I think it's neater.
Also, if the kanji form is rare, I usually give the kana representation only.
If the editors can reach an agreement, I'd be in favour of updating the editorial policy.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会・こくれんあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2219760">国際連合安全保障理事会・こくさいれんごうあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2219760">国際連合安全保障理事会</xref>

i was just wondering what the standard format of xrefs should be.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2219760">国際連合安全保障理事会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2219760">国際連合安全保障理事会・こくさいれんごうあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>UN Security Council</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2219760">国際連合安全保障理事会</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>United Nations Security Council</gloss>

cross reference added.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会・こくれんあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>

This is the ultrashort version of 国際連合安全保障理事会 compared to 国連安全保障理事会, but still, it is the "UN Security Council".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Security Council</gloss>
+<gloss>UN Security Council</gloss>

See comments on 2427610.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会・こくれんあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会</xref>

eij

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2214710">国連安全保障理事会・こくれんあんぜんほしょうりじかい</xref>

Google n-grams:2600

Not really "obsc".

could not find in a news corpus.
whereas:
- 国際連合安全保障理事会
- 国連安全保障理事会
- 国連安保理
appear to be in use.

Entry created

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to bring to a conclusion</gloss>

eij

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to wrap up</gloss>

Ngrams, GG5 (in examples)

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まとめ上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

Don't need to repeat ourselves.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>warship name</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ふじ_(砕氷艦)

In the case of abbreviations, yes.
I don't think this is considered an abbreviation but an x-ref is helpful nonetheless.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2679330">対流圏界面・たいりゅうけんかいめん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2679330">対流圏界面</xref>

i guess the xrefs usually go from the shorter entry to the longer.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2679330">対流圏界面・たいりゅうけんかいめん</xref>

eij, gg5

It's odd indeed.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>ウェブ・ツー・ポイント・オー</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウェブ・ツー・ポイント・オー</reb>

I cannot find any convincing evidence for ウェブにいてんゼロ
It has to be a type for ウェブにてんゼロ

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<reb>ウェブにいてんゼロ</reb>
+<reb>ウェブにてんゼロ</reb>

I'm not convinced.
I'll leave this open and take another look later.

Well, ウェブにいてんゼロ gets 24 Googits and ウェブにてんゼロ gets 6. Odd.

is the last reading a typo of ウェブにてんゼロ?

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウェブツーポイントオー</reb>
+</r_ele>

gg5, daijr/s
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/土壌#.E5.9C.9F.E6.80.A7

As explained in the link above, there are several names for soil depending on the clay content.
Daijr and daijs also give the same percentage range.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>soil</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>loam</gloss>
+<gloss>soil with clay content of 25-37.5%</gloss>

GG5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神の思召し</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神の思召</keb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Heaven's will</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=思し召し
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q125096377
http://yourei.jp/思し召し

『これも神の思し召しよ』
More secular thn it sounds like. Other forms: 神様の思し召し

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>New World Order</gloss>
+<gloss>New World Order (conspiracy theory)</gloss>

gg5, eij, jwiki

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

daijr/s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_web

Definitely がかり.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きゅうしょくけい</reb>
+<reb>きゅうしょくがかり</reb>

gg5 www-images

seems the lunch is often eaten in the class room

gg5, jwiki

gg5, eij, daijr/s, etc.

I never like "type of ..." glosses, but there's not much choice here.

gg5, daijr

GG5 only has sense 1.

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawny_owl

gg5, daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabase

gg5, daijr/s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabase

daijr, eij

Kept [n] because daijr says "また，あらい粒".

gg5, eij, daijr/s

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>often neg. as in ~ものじゃない, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often neg. as in 〜ものじゃない, etc.</s_inf>

That sort of pattern s very common.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>often neg. as in ~ものじゃない, etc.</s_inf>

http://yourei.jp/みっとも
%E3%81%84%E3%81%84

I think the entry should have that it is used only in
negative sentences:

Use is almost always みっともいいものではない
I picked adj-f because I was not sure if this conjugates.

If it matters, I used "attractive" or "appealing" as
translation for the example sentence about the wound.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>becoming</gloss>
+<gloss>seemly</gloss>

GG5

I think this is how it goes.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見っともいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,8 +11,6 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1259250">みっともない</xref>
-<gloss>(with negative verb) shameful</gloss>
-<gloss>disgraceful</gloss>
-<gloss>indecent</gloss>
-<gloss>unseemly</gloss>
-<gloss>unbecoming</gloss>
-<gloss>improper</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1259250">みっともない</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>decent</gloss>
+<gloss>respectable</gloss>
+<gloss>dignified</gloss>

デジタル大辞泉
Example sentence: 「脚の傷も・・・やっばり、みっともいいものじゃない」

I need help with this entry. At first I tried to copy over
the translations from mitotmonai, but is that wrong? They
are negative but this word is positive and the negative
comes fromthe verb.
If that means the entry is incorrect, can you please change
the translations to the positive?

"n-pr" to "n" conversion.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&n-pr;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Incheon (Korea)</gloss>
+<gloss>Incheon (South Korea)</gloss>

Yes. Done.

Should this be in jmnedict as well? (it's not)

Probably. I don't know in anyone says じんせん these days.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>じんせん</reb>
+<reb>インチョン</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>インチョン</reb>
+<reb>じんせん</reb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Inchon</gloss>

gg5, jwiki

jwiki, koj (粗粒玄武岩)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>aeolian soil.</gloss>
+<gloss>aeolian soil</gloss>

gg5, daijr/s

gg5, daijr/s

gg5, eij, daijr/s