@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

G n-grams:
 カチッと	113798
 カチっと	 16947
 かちっと	 14913

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カチッと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カチっと</reb>
+</r_ele>

かっこつける is almost as common as カッコつける. I think we should use hiragana for the x-ref.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2861104">カッコつける</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2861104">かっこつける</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 格好つける　　 │ 5,285 │ 78.7% │
│ 格好付ける　　 │ 1,033 │ 15.4% │
│ 恰好つける　　 │   177 │  2.6% │
│ 恰好付ける　　 │    51 │  0.8% │
│ かっこうつける │   171 │  2.5% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Not [uk] anymore

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>かっこ付ける</keb>

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2861104">カッコつける</xref>

OK, splitting.

@@ -22,8 +21,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カッコつける</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かっこつける</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>

n-grams
げんを担ぐ	7
験を担ぐ	38
ゲンを担ぐ	60 <-- added

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>げんを担ぐ</keb>
+<keb>ゲンを担ぐ</keb>
@@ -9,0 +10,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>げんを担ぐ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲンをかつぐ</reb>
+<re_restr>ゲンを担ぐ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>験を担ぐ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>げんを担ぐ</re_restr>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1009330">どんな・1</xref>

I can't see any problem with adding sK to the 如何 forms. Some may get rK instead of the kokugos have them.
In WWWJDIC the kanji forms shunted back for uk entries.

どういう	9246980	98.2%
どう言う	160947	1.7%
如何いう	3333	0.0%
如何言う	1687	0.0%

Please see longer thoughts on どうしようもない.  I cherry-picked this one additional entry to look at, and it's the only other one I will touch as part of this question.

Question is: can we start using [sK] on 如何/どう entries (other than どう itself) that don't have exceptionally high occurrences of the kanji form (maybe a kotowaza or something might lean on old kanji, I don't know).

Comment is: On any dictionary app that displays the first kanji form prominently (even with a [uk] marking), we have a lot of entries with 如何 displayed(jmdictdb's own advanced search results, and jisho.org are two examples).  This seems to me like a kanji form that a learner at an appropriate level can internalize, and not have spelled out in every entry using どう.  Conversely, it seems like a distraction for any non-advanced learner.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

reverso

I don't think "somehow" "why" etc. are really 
correct.

@@ -22,4 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>somehow</gloss>
-<gloss>how</gloss>
-<gloss>in what way</gloss>
-<gloss>why</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>what sort of</gloss>
+<gloss>what</gloss>

It's from English via エロチック, so no lsrc.

lsrc?

gg5, daij, koj

@@ -11 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1030780">エロチック</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1030760">エロチシズム</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -13 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>eroticism</gloss>
+<gloss>pornographic</gloss>
+<gloss>obscene</gloss>

Oops

G n-grams:
キャンディ  	908148
キャンディー	473666
キャンデー 	 53874

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<reb>キャンディー</reb>
+<reb>キャンディ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8 +9,2 @@
-<reb>キャンディ</reb>
+<reb>キャンディー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Daijr, GG5, etc. G n-grams:
キャンディ	908148
キャンデー	53874
キャンディー	473666

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャンデー</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ignoring (somebody)</gloss>
+<gloss>ignoring (someone)</gloss>

Meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK. Leave as it is.

* both mention it but end with "という"

G n-grams:
フォノグラフ	  983
蓄音機	65490

daijr, daijs

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1422420">蓄音機</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1422420">蓄音機</xref>

Splitting

@@ -22,4 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>prayer</gloss>
-</sense>

G n-grams:
プレーヤー	3991973
プレイヤー	5567685
プレーヤ	151055
プレイヤ	83992
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/プレイヤー

WikiJ says: "プレイヤーまたはプレーヤーは、英単語 “prayer” あるいは “player” の日本語読みである。“prayer” についてはPrayer (曖昧さ回避)を参照。".
There are transcriptions such as "ライク・ア・プレイヤー".
I think it needs to be mentioned. A pity we don't have a clear way of indicating something is used primarily as a transcription and not as a fully-fledged 外来語.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プレイヤー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,2 +13 @@
-<reb>プレイヤー</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<reb>プレイヤ</reb>
@@ -14,3 +16,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>プレイヤ</reb>
@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>prayer</gloss>
+</sense>

Can't find any evidence of プレーヤー being used to mean "prayer".

@@ -22,4 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>prayer</gloss>
-</sense>

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Noun gloss.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>refine</gloss>
+<gloss>refinement</gloss>

daijr, daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Record_(computer_science)

@@ -15 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>record (e.g. athletics)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録・2</xref>
+<gloss>record (e.g. in sports)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>record (data structure)</gloss>

間に合う	1354759
間にあう	19173
まに合う	312

I think we can drop まに合う.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>まに合う</keb>

prog

The "without" is part of the previous verb. I don't think it's a separate sense.

@@ -33,6 +33,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to do without</gloss>
-<gloss>to manage without</gloss>
+<gloss>to manage</gloss>
+<gloss>to make do</gloss>

Wisdom II, Sense 3: [なくて済む]
君に手伝ってもらわなくても間に合う I can manage without your help.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>to be in time for</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in time (for)</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +34,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to do without</gloss>
+<gloss>to manage without</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

N-grams:
間の子	13160
合の子	1680
合いの子	8476
あいの子	4087
あいのこ	6742

I regard the filed tags as not being exclusive, but more the predominant use. That example seems to me the second sense being used more broadly. If it needs to be spelled out, a third sense might be better (as in Daijirin).

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<keb>合の子</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>合の子</keb>

daijs, daijr, prog

- maybe the senses could be swapped, could drop the fld=biol then
- I'd prefer to drop the field tag, since there's a third more abstract sense
  - from prog:
    これは小説とエッセイの合いの子のような作品だ
    This work is something in between a novel and an essay.

@@ -27,0 +28,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>hybrid</gloss>
+<gloss>crossbreed</gloss>
+</sense>

eij mostly katakana
n-grams
犀の角	85
さいの角	1
サイの角	129

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Certainly Google images for "サイ" mainly show rhinos, but then it would be hard to have images for "psi".

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Um, because that's how it seems to be often written. It's written that way in the book I'm reading, and in the ja Wikipedia it is even the article title:

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サイ

Why?

daijr

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仕立</keb>

something, not someone

@@ -35 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>to take</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take (something) along</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring with one</gloss>

G n-grams:
持っていく	1198805
持って行く	 530237
もって行く	  56080
持ってゆく	  21807
もっていく	 179236
もってゆく	   5904

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<keb>もって行く</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<re_restr>もって行く</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +29 @@
+<re_restr>もって行く</re_restr>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to take something along</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (something) along</gloss>

GG5

The single gloss was a bit limited.

@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+<gloss>to take something along</gloss>
+<gloss>to fetch</gloss>
+<gloss>to get</gloss>

G n-grams:
持ってくる	702198
持って来る	112256
もって来る	  8241
もってくる	111385

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もって来る</keb>

vi/vt generally not marked for exp

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

I think sense 3 is obsolete. It's not in the JEs or meikyo/shinmeikai.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -32 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>to overtake (in a vehicle)</gloss>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>to overtake (a vehicle)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to overshoot</gloss>

daijr, daijs

Split into senses.

@@ -19 +19,13 @@
-<gloss>to ride past</gloss>
+<gloss>to ride past (one's stop)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1354770">乗り越える・1</xref>
+<gloss>to climb over</gloss>
+<gloss>to get over</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to overtake (in a vehicle)</gloss>
@@ -21 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>to outdistance</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>Shingon sect (of Buddhism)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shingon sect</gloss>

daijs
G n-grams:
 真言	175990
 眞言	1179

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>

More like GG5's entry now.

gg5 koj daijs

simplifying
---
removing the "true word" sense. Seems like an overly literal version of the other two senses.
(although koj has it as 真実の語)

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<field>&Buddh;</field>
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>true word</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -27 +21 @@
-<gloss>Shingon (Sino-Japanese esoteric Buddhism, originating in the eighth century)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shingon sect (of Buddhism)</gloss>

G n-grams:
真上	375521
ま上	   920
まうえ	  1038

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ま上</keb>

G n-grams:
大嘘	143976
大ウソ	 26189
大うそ	  7991
大噓	    59
おおうそ	  1465
おおウソ	   181

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大ウソ</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19,7 @@
+<re_restr>大嘘</re_restr>
+<re_restr>大うそ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>大噓</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おおウソ</reb>
+<re_restr>大ウソ</re_restr>

daijr, daijs
KM n-grams:
大嘘	4340
大うそ	165

@@ -5,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大うそ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大噓</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>big lie</gloss>
+<gloss>outrageous lie</gloss>
+<gloss>outright lie</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>ordinal</gloss>
+<gloss>prefix for forming ordinal numbers</gloss>

gg5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonograph

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>phonograph</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

G n-grams:
電磁	692109
電磁は	912
電磁が	399
電磁な	181

This is virtually never a free-standing noun. I'm attempting to make the POS reflect its actual usage.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>electromagnetic (physics)</gloss>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>electromagnetic</gloss>

G n-grams:
 閉じ込める	72656
 閉じこめる	22597
 閉込める 	   57
 とじこめる 	 6618
--
 閉じ込め  	730231
 閉じこめ  	149033
 閉込め   	  2460
 とじこめ  	 32497

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams:
 また木	10711
 股木	  457
 叉木	  353
 又木	 2303
 またぎ	91634  - false matches?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>叉木</keb>
+<keb>また木</keb>
@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>叉木</keb>

N-grams.

Hardly ever 網状が.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

daijr/s

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あみじょう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>net</gloss>
+<gloss>netlike</gloss>
+<gloss>mesh-like</gloss>
+<gloss>reticulated</gloss>
@@ -15 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>reticulated</gloss>

G n-grams:
夕闇	124289
夕やみ	  2294 
ゆうやみ	  2083

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>夕やみ</keb>

tidying

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>to be in a slump (e.g. business, economy)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in a slump (business, economy, etc.)</gloss>

gg5
G n-grams:
 落ち込む	516426
 落込む	 11865
 落ちこむ	 10368
 おちこむ	  4124

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>落ちこむ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -22 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>to feel down (sad)</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel down</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel sad</gloss>
+<gloss>to be depressed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in low spirits</gloss>

I guess not. it seemed plausible, but I can't find it being used for that.

Is there really any compelling evidence for 裏 really being 
used in this sense this outside of the now deleted entries?

Deleted 裏プロセスグループ. Could be a new sense.

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>background (e.g. computer process)</gloss>

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>in the shadows</gloss>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<gloss>behind (somebody's) back</gloss>
+<gloss>behind (someone's) back</gloss>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<gloss>behind one's back</gloss>
+<gloss>behind (somebody's) back</gloss>

Examples adjusted.

daij gg5 prog

@@ -17 +17,4 @@
-<gloss>bottom (or another side that is hidden from view)</gloss>
+<gloss>opposite side</gloss>
+<gloss>bottom</gloss>
+<gloss>other side</gloss>
+<gloss>side hidden from view</gloss>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>opposite side</gloss>
@@ -26 +28 @@
-<gloss>behind (the house)</gloss>
+<gloss>behind</gloss>
@@ -35 +37 @@
-<gloss>out of sight</gloss>
+<gloss>in the shadows</gloss>
@@ -37 +39,9 @@
-<gloss>in the shadows</gloss>
+<gloss>offstage</gloss>
+<gloss>behind one's back</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>more (to something than meets the eye)</gloss>
+<gloss>hidden side (e.g. of one's personality)</gloss>
+<gloss>unknown circumstances</gloss>
+<gloss>different side</gloss>
@@ -47,0 +58 @@
+<gloss>contrary</gloss>

prog, E-DIC, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>labor trouble</gloss>
-<gloss>labour trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>labor dispute</gloss>
+<gloss>labour dispute</gloss>
+<gloss>industrial dispute</gloss>

Thanks.

Spell fix of losses.

@@ -43 +43 @@
-<gloss>to make up for one's loses</gloss>
+<gloss>to make up for one's losses</gloss>

daijr, daijs, prog

Most of the JEs have "overtake" as a gloss but I think that's misleading.

Daijr:  あとから追って，先に出た人に並ぶ
Daijs: 追いかけて先に出たものに行き着く

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>to overtake</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +35,9 @@
+<gloss>to draw level</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull even</gloss>
+<gloss>to reach</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be compensated</gloss>
+<gloss>to make up for one's loses</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
書き入れ時	11564	41.5%
かき入れ時	8250	29.6% // found in meeting notes for my research lab
かきいれ時	5199	18.6%
書入れ時	1115	4.0%
掻き入れ時	1759	6.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かき入れ時</keb>

daijr, daijs, E-DIC
KM n-grams:
書き入れ時	351
掻き入れ時	65

I don't consider these separate senses. Neither does daijr/s.

Daijs marks 掻き入れ時 as incorrect.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掻き入れ時</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -18,5 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>busy business period</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>time of greatest profits</gloss>
+<gloss>busiest and most profitable business period</gloss>
+<gloss>peak season</gloss>

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1982860">代・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1412560">台・5</xref>
@@ -27,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1982860">代・2</xref>

https://www.ytv.co.jp/announce/kotoba/back
/1801-1900/1871.html
１０歳台 but not １０台

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>十台</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -24 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -31,2 +26,0 @@
-<stagk>１０代</stagk>
-<stagk>十代</stagk>

def more common.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１０代</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,4 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>１０代</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<stagk>１０代</stagk>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<stagk>１０代</stagk>

Fixed x-ref.

@@ -25 +25,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1412560">台・だい・6</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1982860">代・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1982860">代・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1412560">台・5</xref>

Seems to be a superfluous ; in the meaning.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone to a place)</gloss>

gg5

Yes. We put the direct object in brackets.
I think this is clearer. "(someone, somewhere)" could be read as "someone OR somewhere".

@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) with one</gloss>
+<gloss>to take along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead away</gloss>

brackets around "someone" as it's vt, right?

@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>to take someone (to some place)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take someone along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead someone away</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>

Indeed. WWWJDIC plays up for vk expressions where the first surface form has くる instead of 来る. I've done a quick fix which makes it use 連れて来る instead. The く/き/こ situation is explained in a comment.

てーform つれてきて

G n-grams:
 連れてくる 	177287
 連れて来る	 45689
 つれて来る	  2158
 つれてくる	 24196

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>連れてくる</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +13 @@
-<keb>連れてくる</keb>
+<keb>つれて来る</keb>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -15,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

うっとりする deleted.  also, not a noun

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2261880">うっとりする・1</xref>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +22 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2261880">うっとりする・2</xref>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

G n-grams:
うっとり	965404
ウットリ	161909

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウットリ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2261880">うっとりする</xref>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2261880">うっとりする・1</xref>
@@ -18,0 +23,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2261880">うっとりする・2</xref>

Listed as on-mim in Makino, A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

G n-grams:
  音楽家	822554

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -39 +39,3 @@
-<gloss>one's hand (mahjong, card games, etc.)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<field>&cards;</field>
+<gloss>one's hand</gloss>

大辞林

@@ -33,2 +33,3 @@
-<gloss>one's intentions</gloss>
-<gloss>one's plan</gloss>
+<gloss>one's (concealed) intentions</gloss>
+<gloss>one's cards</gloss>
+<gloss>one's scheme</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=手の内

@@ -27 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>scope of one's power</gloss>
+<gloss>(in one's) grip</gloss>
+<gloss>(under one's) control</gloss>
+<gloss>(in one's) pocket</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>easy task</gloss>
+<gloss>piece of cake</gloss>
+<gloss>cakewalk</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>easy matter</gloss>
-<gloss>piece of cake</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>cake served with tea</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>cake served with tea</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
お茶の子	19189
御茶の子	1587

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>御茶の子</keb>
+<keb>お茶の子</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>お茶の子</keb>
+<keb>御茶の子</keb>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>piece of cake</gloss>

KM n-grams:
蝋梅	542
臘梅	146

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蝋梅</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>蝋梅</keb>
+<keb>蠟梅</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

OED, eol

Calycanthus fragrans is spelled incorrectly, and even if it's a synonym for this at all, it should still be removed according to the 'style guide'

@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox)</gloss>
@@ -20,3 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>fragrant wintersweet</gloss>
-<gloss>Chimonanthus praecox</gloss>
-<gloss>Calycantus fragrans</gloss>

gg5 
G n-grams:
 糸杉	15442
 いとすぎ	 4063
 イトスギ	 3685

jwiki(イトスギ)

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イトスギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +16 @@
-<gloss>cypress</gloss>
+<gloss>cypress (Cupressus sp.)</gloss>

KM n-grams:
生理的食塩水	193
生理食塩水	1842

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>physiological saline solution</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831471">生理食塩水</xref>
+<gloss>physiological saline</gloss>
+<gloss>normal saline</gloss>
+<gloss>saline solution</gloss>

daijr/s

The kokugo examples for sense 3 are very old. Not in meikyo/shinmeikai or the JEs.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1342440">処女</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, etc.

According to Koj, the "virgin" sense is an abbreviation of 白地娘.

@@ -22,0 +22,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. しらじ</s_inf>
+<gloss>blank</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

N-grams:
呼び物	16014
よびもの	168
呼物	198
呼びもの	928

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>呼びもの</keb>

daijr, prog, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>呼物</keb>
@@ -16 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>special attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>main attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>special feature</gloss>
+<gloss>big draw</gloss>

prog, daijs, shinmeikai, saito
寝入る	21392	98.7%
寝いる	278	1.3%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to sleep soundly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to become dull</gloss>
+<gloss>to lose vigour</gloss>
+<gloss>to slacken</gloss>

G n-grams:
 寝入る	21392
 寝いる	278
 ねいる	65113
Tanaka

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寝いる</keb>

gg5
G n-grams:
 覆い隠す  	40134
 おおい隠す	  884
 覆いかくす	  360
 おおいかくす	  824

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +21,3 @@
+<gloss>to cloak</gloss>
+<gloss>to hide</gloss>
+<gloss>to conceal</gloss>

n-grams

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おおい隠す</keb>

gg5, prog

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to improve</gloss>
-<gloss>to get better</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a turn for the better (of an illness, patient, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to improve</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to recover</gloss>

G n-grams:
 快方に向かう	10871
 快方にむかう	  420
 快方に向う	  399
 かいほうにむかう	No matches
Tanaka

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>快方にむかう</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>快方に向う</keb>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

daijs

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>接ぎ</keb>
@@ -16 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>a patch</gloss>
+<gloss>patch</gloss>
+<gloss>patching</gloss>
@@ -19 +23,6 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>join</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>heir</gloss>

daijr/s (聞え)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/聞こえ

I think "sonority" is a separate sense.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞え</keb>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>sonority</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +35,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>sonority</gloss>
+</sense>

中辞典

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>sonority</gloss>

daijr, daijs, prog

Added a further 2 senses.
Struggled with the glosses for the 1st sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>being able to hear something (clearly)</gloss>
+<gloss>clearness of a sound</gloss>
+<gloss>reception (e.g. of a radio station)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>renown</gloss>
@@ -18 +25,6 @@
-<gloss>renown</gloss>
+<gloss>hearsay</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>impression (that something gives off)</gloss>
+<gloss>respectability</gloss>

I think they both work.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>(school) year</gloss>
+<gloss>cohort</gloss>

cohort?

something like "school year", maybe?

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/9892926

There's another meaning to this, close to sense 2, that I'm not really sure how to express. Someone on Terrace House introduced herself and said 私は20歳で21の代. I feel like the current glosses are not helpful in understanding that sentence.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2831469">特別利益</xref>

So it's clear this refers to money.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

daijs

sounds more col than sl to me

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>to tell on</gloss>

Yeah, this should go.

As an isolated entry it is not very useful.
But if we add an xref from じゃない[2] to 近いじゃない
it could maybe work as an example?

I know some learners get confused about adj-i+くない and adj-i+じゃない, but I do wonder whether this is needed

Entry created

Rejecting fork

Google n-gram counts for various searches:
"可きではない"	108
"冖冠"		96
"ワ冠"		105

可きではない	124
冖冠		128
ワ冠		121

Jisho.org Parsing issues:
可きではない		https://jisho.org/search/可きではない
躊躇す可きではないが	https://jisho.org/search/躊躇す可きではないが

A reply to the comment. (I have quite a bit to say in reply. I'll try to keep it as brief as possible. If such lengthy replies don't belong in these kinds of edit comments, please let me know. I've included my email address if that's useful.)

1. I added a [uk] tag to mirror the same in 可き. That should at least notify that the kanji version(s) are less common.

2. I attempted to replicate your Google n-grams, but I'm not sure of the correct procedure, though I searched around for it. It seems it's just page counts? I assume with 'duplicates omitted', and you go to the last page of the search to get most accurate estimates? If I'm "doin' it rong", please point me to the correct procedure.

  2.1 I could not replicate your exact n-gram counts. Perhaps it depends on prior search history or something. So, instead I just used the same procedure each time, and hopefully my relative counts will give a better-than-nothing data point.

  2.2 I wasn't confident with the counts with 'raw' searches, so I include primarily results with "quotation" marks around them, and 'raw' results underneath. Hopefully the quoted searches provide more accurate results. The counts without quotes were larger, but not wildly out of proportion.

  2.3 There are slight differences between the counts at the top of the page, e.g. "... about 108 results", and at the bottom of the page, e.g. "... we have omitted some entries very similar to the 110 already displayed." For simplicity, since the differences are small, and the top-of-page counts are more obvious, I've used the top counts.

3. I did a simple search for "beki" on Jisho.org (which relies on JMDICT), and it converted the romaji into a search for べき. A direct search for べき returns identical results. I chose this search because that's how I've often used Jisho.org; it seemed natural.

  3.1 The first result was of course 可き. Result #6 was 冖冠, and result #11 was べきではない. A similar search on JMDICT itself gave a different order: #3 冖冠, #12 可き, and #17 べきではない. Not sure why this was the order, just reporting it.

Analysis/Opinion:
A search for べき (on Jisho.org) results in 可き, 冖冠 (kanji "wa" radical at top (radical 14)), and べきではない with roughly equal footing (all in top 15 results), though with べきではない below 冖冠, even on the JMDICT search, even though both 可き and べきではない are vastly more 'popular' than 冖冠, which is a fairly obscure Japanese language terminology (AFAICT).

So, I thought, "How does 冖冠 stack up in Google n-gram results?" Turns out that it's about even with 可きではない. Roughly 100 page counts with duplicates omitted.

That clearly says to me that while Google n-grams will be a useful heuristic, there are clearly additional considerations other than mere internet popularity that factor into whether it's worth including an entry or not. For example, including an entry about the 'wa' radical in a kanji is relevant to the Japanese language itself, so I conclude that -- even though 冖冠 has a low Google n-gram -- considerations of an entry's relevance to the Japanese language itself can overcome that rough rule-of-thumb.

But, just to be certain I wasn't jumping the gun, I noticed that the entry for 冖冠 has a 'see also' reference to ワ冠. Perhaps 冖冠 is obscure, and ワ冠 is actually the more common terminology? But no, as the n-gram counts in the References above show, it's actually nearly identical to 冖冠, and thus to ​可きではない also.

What about 可きではない? Does it have any relevance to the Japanese language itself? I have two lines of reasoning that it does:

1. The first entry on the Google search for "可きではない" is for a book from 2000 titled 徳田秋声全集 (Complete Works of Shūsei Tokuda). 徳田秋声 lived from 1 February 1872 – 18 November 1943, so that seems to me that he would still be considered relatively 'modern', to fit with JMDICT's goal to reflect modern Japanese. According to the English Wikipedia, several of his novels were made into movies. On of his short stories was included in "The Columbia Anthology of Modern Japanese Literature" (2005), and another in "Modern Japanese Stories: An Anthology" (originally 1962, but with several reprints and a second edition, latest published 2005) by Ivan I. Morris (who himself has a Wikipedia page and academic credentials, etc.).

So, this is at least one case (literally the first Google result) in which 可きではない appears in culturally/historically significant modern (according to scholars at Columbia University) Japanese literature/writing. Since several other of the results are also physical books, I think that may be what's skewing the n-gram so low. While it might not be very common in present day usage, on the Internet especially, it was used in modern literary works whose contents barely show up on Google searches. And most of those results will be marked as 'duplicates' by Google, yet these are popular books, earning themselves many reprints even from the year 2000 and beyond. Clearly, this usage is not so rare as the Google n-gram heuristic at first makes it appear.

I hope that helps to dispense with the Google n-gram objection. More important (IMHO) though is my second point.

2. A major purpose of any Japanese-English dictionary, or especially a Japanese-Multilingual dictionary, is to aid people who are not only using the dictionary as a static tool of reference -- the way most native English speakers would use an English dictionary, or a fluently bilingual person might need to look up the odd word here or there -- but as a dynamic tool to aid in *learning* Japanese from the standpoint of a native English (or whatever language) speaker.

To this end, it makes sense to include 'not so common on the Internet with native Japanese speakers these days' information that nevertheless reflects the structure and consistency of the Japanese language itself, thus to make it 'visible' to the confused beginner and intermediate learners.

The word 可き happens to be one of those particularly confusing words from the standpoint of someone mostly only familiar with English grammar, idioms, and vocabulary. Especially in the way that it connects with the words around it. I know it's confusing, because it's been a stumbling block for me for weeks, more so than most other grammar/vocabulary points I've been able to work through with relative ease.

I use Jisho.org (again, based largely on JMDICT data) more as a User's Manual than as a mere dictionary. It helps me find the similarities between words and kanji that are obscured 'in the wild' where all sorts of Internet idioms used by native speakers would be eternally mysterious to me if I didn't have a tool like Jisho.org to help me parse out the meanings, and see the connections between kana-from-the-wild and the corresponding kanji in my 'User's Manual'.

As it stands, Jisho.org itself runs into stumbling blocks when one tries to learn about 可き and how to use it properly (regardless whether with kanji or kana). I will give you a perfect example:

Jisho.org uses the JMDICT entries and part-of-speech metadata to help you understand a text fragment (word, phrase, sentence, whatever) by pasting in the entire text fragment into the search box and it will do its best to parse the text, classify each word or expression in the sentence, and allow you to click on each parsed word to see what it means in context. So, in order to help me understand 可き better, I wanted to learn how it connects with ではない grammar (and not, for example, がない or some other idiom).

So, I searched on Jisho.org for "可きではない", as seems very natural to do. But instead of getting the actual entry for "べきではない", as you'd expect, instead Jisho doesn't find that entry (because the kanji is not included in that entry) so it tries to parse-out this text fragment as best it can. The results are quite discouraging. Link to this example in References above. It splits up the text like this:

か
可 き で は ない 

In other words, it is forced to interpret the 可 kanji as か ('possible') instead of being べ as part of べき. This confusion is no doubt caused by the other characters ではない being forced to be interpreted as で, は, and ない, rather than as part of the idiomatic way that べき joins with ではない instead of something like がない.

Likewise, if we try to find an example sentence using 可きではない, a quick google search turns up that Shūsei Tokuda book, with a handy text fragment "躊躇す可きではないが". Sadly, this extra context doesn't seem to do the parser any good. It botches the parsing as:

ちゅうちょす	か 
躊躇す		可 き で は ない が 

The same issue arises: The べきではない entry simply *lacks* the crucial piece of information that it *can* be written as 可きではない.

But, critically, it's not that 可きではない is all that popular. In fact it has probably fallen out of current usage, for the most part. But the more important point, which is the entire point I'm trying to make here with point #2, is that 可きではない is *correct* Japanese. So, from my perspective as a Japanese learner, I would wish for my 'User's Manual' Jisho.org to be able to recognize this correct Japanese and tell me what it means without sending me on a wild goose chase trying to figure out what the connection to 可 (possible) has to do with anything, and why き is marked as an unknown noun (perhaps 'tree', perhaps 'spirit', who knows?).

Summing Up

Now, this may seem like a lot of hullabaloo about one measly entry in JMDICT. What's the big deal?

Well, as I mentioned in my initial comment, this is just *one* example of where a minor touch-up to the JMDICT data could help others who come after me to not have to trip up and get confused and run around in circles. There are many other examples I've run across over the past couple of months, and I held off trying to make any edits, since it seemed a little too risky at the time (not knowing much about the innards of JMDICT at the time); didn't want to mess anything up. But this example with 可きではない seemed like a perfect little test-case to try out a small edit that would smooth out the learning experience for anyone else following a similar learning path.

And just today, I was trying to understand the system of こんな, そんな, あんな, どんな, and how they connect to related words like こういう, etc., and I found yet more instances where the JMDICT entries are simply incomplete (from a learner's point of view), and where 'current popularity on the Internet' should probably not be the main guide as to whether some minor changes are accepted/rejected, but rather whether those changes would improve the quality of all the various tools used by a Japanese language learner (not just Jisho.org, but several other learning sites I'm using as well), that all inevitably depend on the JMDICT data itself.

I finally understand that こんな system, but it took quite a while, and it really didn't need to if the JMDICT entries just had a little additional information, and the correction of a few inconsistencies between all the different related entries. All of which I'd feel much more confident to try to fix if this particular 可きではない test proves worthwhile.

So, I apologize for this huge comment. But it seems like an important enough point, that I felt it necessary to justify it at some length: that dictionaries, especially language-to-language dictionaries, aren't just about 'what's being used most frequently', but also about being language-learning toolkit/documentation/user-manual for language learners.

Hopefully this doesn't annoy the heck out of ya. If you got this far, thanks for your patience and time. Cheers! And take care these days.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

A quick google search for "可きではない" found 6000+ hits. I briefly scanned a few to make sure I didn't mess up the search, and they were legitimate.

Just adding a kanji version, to parallel 可き. This is my first edit, so if there are any problems, please let me know. I've been tempted to make some similar edits in the past, but wasn't sure about it, so this is a test for me. 

The motivation to add this kanji reading is that I'm learning kanji via different sites that indirectly use JMDICT data, and having these additional kanji 'readings' would assist in this learning process.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>可きではない</keb>
+</k_ele>

G n-grams 1197451

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

〈可／べ〉きでは〈無／な〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ べきでは無い │    18,958 │  1.6% │ - add, sK
│ 可きではない │       210 │  0.0% │ - add, sK
│ 可きでは無い │        33 │  0.0% │
│ べきではない │ 1,197,884 │ 98.4% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼───────────┼───────┤
│ べきでは無く │       248 │  0.3% │
│ 可きでは無く │         0 │  0.0% │
│ 可きではなく │         0 │  0.0% │
│ べきではなく │    74,530 │ 99.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

I didn't read the long discussion in this entry but I don't think we have a problem with these sorts of kanji forms anymore.

@@ -3,0 +4,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>べきでは無い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>可きではない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I've responded to Rob directly.

Thanks for the explanations on your decision. And sorry for the long reply. I was just worried that if I didn't go into the whole thought process, it might seem like I was arguing for a very nit-picky thing, when really for me it's much more of a big-picture kind of question.

With that in mind, I notice that no one has yet responded to the point I made about JMDICT being the data source for many Japanese language learning tools, and even if data may not reflect popularity (as in the example of "(wa) katakana at top"), it may still be worthwhile for the sake of documenting the language itself.

All that said, I respect and accept your decision on this particular entry; but I'm still interested in hearing your thoughts/opinions about this more 'philosophical' point about how JMDICT should (or should not) attempt to support language learners, rather than just reflect current-day usage.

Is such discussion appropriate in these comments or is there another/better way I can ask about this kind of thing?

Jim, I'll look for your email address and try to email you. Thanks for the offer. [D'oh! I see it now at the top of the confirmation page.]

Thanks, Marcus. I think that covers it, and I'll close this off now. I don't mind having the kanji form shown on the basic forms (GG5 has 可き in the べき entry), but I do think it is inappropriate to have them in the virtually-always-kana expressions.
Re この/此の/etc. I see Daijirin and GG5 have the 此の, but the other JEs don't.
Marcus: I've added a GitHub issue for [rare]
Rob: if you want to find out more about the n-grams, email me. They are not the counts you get from Google searches, which are almost useless.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>可きではない</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

not actually vs in kokugos

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

I don't think sense 2 is an abbreviation.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1217900">願い・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1217900">願い・2</xref>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>favour (to ask)</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +27 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001720">御願いします</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001720">お願いします</xref>

gg5

I think exp is sufficient. That's what we have on 何日か and 何ヶ月か.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>a number of people</gloss>
+<gloss>several people</gloss>
@@ -19 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>several people</gloss>

G n-grams 1579613

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

eij G-ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>a few people</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>several people</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>traditional winter hunters in Tohoku</gloss>
+<gloss>traditional winter hunters in Tōhoku</gloss>

jwiki, wiki

they still exist today, so "ancient" may be misleading

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>又鬼</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>ancient hunting communities in Tohoku</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>traditional winter hunters in Tohoku</gloss>
+<gloss>matagi</gloss>

koj, nikk

->standard spelling

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まとぎ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>ancient hunting communities in Touhoku</gloss>
+<gloss>ancient hunting communities in Tohoku</gloss>

daijr, daijs

@@ -9 +9,7 @@
-<gloss>turntable</gloss>
+<gloss>turntable (record player)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831458">転車台</xref>
+<gloss>railway turntable</gloss>
+<gloss>car turntable</gloss>

https://encrypted.google.com/search?
q=%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%83%86%E3%83%BC%E3%83%96%E3
%83%AB%E3%80%80%E7%A9%BA%E6%B8%AF&num=20&source=lnms&tbm=is
ch&sa=X&ei=qxiRVci_GoL-
ugTy7qBY&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1246&bih=538
http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2137644189157865801

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>baggage carousel</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

n-grams
勝負パンツ	544
勝負下着	559
勝負服	1345

seems more colloquial than slang to me

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

G n-grams:
ばっくれる	14081
バックレる	4432
バックれる	1959

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バックレる</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バックれる</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think so too.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

daijs, daijr

sense 1 removed [sl], sense 2 added [col]
only daijs says sense 2 is [col]
I think both might be [col]

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2079190">しらばくれる</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

打っ付け	147	0.1%
ぶっ付け	56	0.0%
打っつけ	35	0.0%
ぶっつけ	150248	99.8%

@@ -6,6 +6 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ぶっ付け</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>打っつけ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2121050">ぶっつけ本番</xref>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -27 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

G n-grams:
打っ付け	147
ぶっつけ	150248
打っつけ	35
ぶっ付け	56

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぶっ付け</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打っつけ</keb>

daijr, daijs, prog
KM n-grams:
ぶっつけ	        4809
ぶっつけ本番	2773
ぶっつけで	460
ぶっつけな	16
ぶっつけに	46
ぶっつけの	73
ぶっつけが	16
ぶっつけを	11

Split into senses.

Usually appears with で or directly before a noun, which is why I've kept the [n] as the first PoS.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打っ付け</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -13,2 +17,18 @@
-<gloss>outspoken</gloss>
-<gloss>(at) first</gloss>
+<gloss>without warning</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>unreserved</gloss>
+<gloss>without restraint</gloss>
+<gloss>frank</gloss>
+<gloss>blunt</gloss>
+<gloss>direct</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>start</gloss>
+<gloss>outset</gloss>

Entry created

daijr (sense 2): " 確実である。「失敗は―・えている」"

Should be glossed as a verb.

@@ -27,3 +27,4 @@
-<gloss>clear</gloss>
-<gloss>distinct</gloss>
-<gloss>apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>to be clear</gloss>
+<gloss>to be evident</gloss>
+<gloss>to be certain</gloss>
+<gloss>to be definite</gloss>

Sense 2 should probably be adj-f if this is how we want to gloss it?

koj (has sense 2 with a conjugated example)

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

I don't know (don't track them.)
I see that searching for Bukkōji works in both wwwjdic and jisho.org, but Bukkoji fails in jisho.org and works in wwwjdic due to a partial match.
We have just on 900 entries with ō in the glosses.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>Kōbe</gloss>

I don't think it's needed. How often are macrons used in lookups?

We have 7 entries with 神戸 and as usual in JMdict we don't use macrons. I'm about to run a big Kou->Kō conversion in JMnedict, and it might be an idea to have a version with the macron searchable here.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>Kōbe</gloss>

aligning with other city entries

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Kobe (port city near Osaka)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kobe (city)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Shingon sect (of Buddhism)</gloss>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>Shingon sect</gloss>