@@ -42,2 +42,2 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>
-<gloss>front nine (golf)</gloss>
+<field>&golf;</field>
+<gloss>front nine</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>out (of a ball, in tennis, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>out (of a ball; in tennis, etc.)</gloss>

hotel e-mail:
イン15時 / アウト12時
other hotels:
https://www.yukoyuko.net/5437/plan/2012/2004
ホテル眺望山荘（神奈川県/湯河原温泉）の【朝食付／アウト10時】22時半までチェックインOK☆

https://tosimaya.co.jp/plans/plans011/
【レイトアウト１１時】お客様の声から生まれた、朝はゆっくりプラン★お布団そのまま２度寝もどうぞ♪

(レイトアウト	3996
レイトチェックアウト	50821)

@@ -56,0 +57,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1077560">チェックアウト</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>check-out time</gloss>

I don't think your GPS' use of the word is any different from the "curve" in "curve ahead."

I think this entry might be improved by adding the nuance of "tight curve". Consider the sentence "この先、カーブがあります" which my navi says ahead of very tight curves only.

mk

splitting on etym

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,5 +23,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">cave</lsource>
-<gloss>(wine) cellar</gloss>

gg5, googits

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>bend</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>curveball</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>installation (of image)</gloss>
+<gloss>installation (of an image)</gloss>

gg5, koj

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>curve ball</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1036560">カーブ・2</xref>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>curveball</gloss>

daij, meikyo

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1426200">抽象的</xref>

Various JEs.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>material</gloss>
+<gloss>substantial</gloss>

Don't agree with "tangible". Not in the JEs.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>tangible</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>later mention</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>mentioning later</gloss>
+<gloss>discussing below</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>刺傷</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>a stab</gloss>
+<gloss>stab wound</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>bite (e.g. from a insect)</gloss>
+<gloss>sting</gloss>
+<gloss>prick</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>lard</gloss>
+<gloss>suet</gloss>

クビを長くして	1240

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クビを長くする</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クビをながくする</reb>
+<re_restr>クビを長くする</re_restr>

daij

this is not in daij, but 首を長くする is. 
(with 「xxして待つ」 as examples in both)
so it conjugates

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>首を長くして</keb>
+<keb>首を長くする</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>首をながくして</keb>
+<keb>首をながくする</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>くびをながくして</reb>
+<reb>くびをながくする</reb>
@@ -15,2 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>eagerly (looking forward to)</gloss>
-<gloss>expectantly</gloss>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to eagerly look forward to</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>performance (e.g. music, theatre, opera)</gloss>
+<gloss>performance (of a play, opera, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>presentation</gloss>

Meant to add this before.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>previous mention</gloss>

daijs, koj
G n-grams:
前陳	596

Obscure. Not in daijr.
Doesn't appear to be [adj-no]. N-grams only return 前陳の如く and 前陳の通り.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>the above-mentioned</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1393180">前述</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>mentioning previously</gloss>

daij, prog
G n-grams:
挿し木	254862
挿木	12659
さし木	18498

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>さし木</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>挿木</keb>
@@ -11,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -13 +20 @@
-<gloss>planting</gloss>
+<gloss>planting (a cutting)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>(re)forestation</gloss>
+<gloss>forestation</gloss>
+<gloss>afforestation</gloss>
+<gloss>reforestation</gloss>

Iwakoku, sankoku, and smk say 雅語的.

Iwakoku puts the note on the second sense. I'd guess that the first sense probably isn't used much in practice, and that it's only mentioned by the refs in order to explain the literal meaning.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 息吹　 │ 349,832 │ 89.1% │
│ 息吹き │  40,675 │ 10.4% │
│ 気吹　 │   1,937 │  0.5% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ いぶき │ 186,908 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>muddy state</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>muddy</gloss>
+<gloss>covered in mud</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス, Eijiro

Usually used adjectivally.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>morass of mud</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>muddy state</gloss>
+<gloss>mud</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/泥んこ

There is another use of this word I've run across a few times that doesn't really mean "morass", but I'm not quite sure how to phrase it, particularly as a noun.  For example, at the reference link, one example sentence is 少年は顔中泥んこになって帰って来た -- "the boy returned with his face covered with mud"... you wouldn't say "his face had become a morass of mud".  Or in the sentence I just found in the book I'm reading:  両手は泥んこなのが自分でも良く分かっていた -- he knew that both his hands were covered in mud.  Again, "morass of mud" doesn't really fit.  So I'm not sure whether it would be best to add a noun meaning here like "muddy thing", or if it should be a na adjectival like "muddy".

Each time I've run across this word in the past and looked it up here, I've had the same dilemma about what to add, but in the past I just gave up.  This time, though, I thought I'd leave a comment and let you decide what might be best  :-)

OK

Many of the kokugos only have one reading or the other. I think it would be good to keep both readings.
Since this is a relatively rare expression, I think we can hide all but the first kanji form.

〈鳶／とび／とんび／トビ／トンビ〉が〈鷹／たか／タカ〉を〈生／う〉む

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 鳶が鷹を生む　　　 │ 628 │ 49.3% │
│ トンビが鷹を生む　 │ 217 │ 17.0% │
│ とんびが鷹を生む　 │ 173 │ 13.6% │
│ トンビがタカを生む │ 109 │  8.6% │
│ 鳶が鷹をうむ　　　 │  35 │  2.7% │
│ トビが鷹を生む　　 │  26 │  2.0% │
│ とんびがたかをうむ │  56 │  4.4% │
│ トンビがタカをうむ │  30 │  2.4% │
├─ーーーーーーーーー─┼─────┼───────┤
│ 鳶が鷹を生ん　　　 │ 218 │ 54.0% │
│ トンビが鷹を生ん　 │  82 │ 20.3% │
│ トンビがタカを生ん │  66 │ 16.3% │
│ とんびが鷹を生ん　 │  38 │  9.4% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +23,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

鳶が鷹を生む	628	53.1%
トンビが鷹を生む	217	18.3%
とんびが鷹を生む	173	14.6%
トンビがタカを生む	109	9.2%
とんびがたかをうむ	56	4.7%
とびがたかをうむ	0	0.0%
とびが鷹を生む	0	0.0%

Or the とびがたかをうむ could simply be dropped.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<re_restr>鳶が鷹を生む</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">for a kite to give birth to a hawk</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">a kite gives birth to a hawk</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update: Removal of n-t POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

gg5

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>everyday</gloss>
+<gloss>daily</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>usual</gloss>
+<gloss>routine</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>everyday</gloss>
-<gloss>usual</gloss>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams
不真面目	133216
不まじめ	  2373
不マジメ	   973
-------
不真面目な	57162	  
不真面目が	  908

not yoji

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不まじめ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不マジメ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>不真面目</re_restr>
+<re_restr>不まじめ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふマジメ</reb>
+<re_restr>不マジメ</re_restr>
@@ -13,3 +25,4 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
-<gloss>unsteadiness</gloss>
-<gloss>lack of sincerity</gloss>
+<gloss>not serious</gloss>
+<gloss>frivolous</gloss>
+<gloss>insincere</gloss>
+<gloss>unsteady</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5, prog

Not [adj-no].
I think this is a better selection of glosses.

@@ -18,3 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>beast</gloss>
-<gloss>monster</gloss>
+<gloss>wild beast</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>brute</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>materialism (philosophy)</gloss>
+<field>&phil;</field>
+<gloss>materialism</gloss>

gg5 koj daijs

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>materialism</gloss>
+<gloss>materialism (philosophy)</gloss>

gg5, prog, 中辞典, daij

Splitting.

@@ -16,2 +16,9 @@
-<gloss>a head (of water)</gloss>
-<gloss>a difference</gloss>
+<gloss>difference in elevation (between two points in a body of water)</gloss>
+<gloss>head</gloss>
+<gloss>drop (e.g. of a waterfall)</gloss>
+<gloss>fall distance</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>difference</gloss>
+<gloss>gap</gloss>

gg5, luminous

I don't think "deepen" works.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to get (very) cold</gloss>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>to deepen (cold)</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>to feel cold (of the body)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be chilled to the bones</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel very cold (of the body)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be chilled to the bone</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>to decline</gloss>

冷え込んで	146074	97.7%
冷えこんで	3503	2.3%

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冷えこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/直球-569509

ちょくきゅう doesn't seem to be in the abridged version of nikkoku or any other refs. Probably not worth recording.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちょくきゅう</reb>

直球の質問: 43k googits

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>straight</gloss>
-<gloss>frank</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>direct (e.g. question)</gloss>
+<gloss>blunt</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1510910">変化球</xref>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

OK. I've done that.

In my initial post I didn't have a suggested course of action, I was just providing some info. I think 
adding 流行[io] to the はやり entry would be ideal, though. Thanks for taking a look at this :^)

Koj is a bit old-fashioned with okurigana (and many other things). The JEs and more modern kokugos stick very much to 流行/りゅうこう and 流行り/はやり. I'm not sure whether Tyler is suggesting a (re)merge of the entries, or just adding 流行[io] to the はやり entry. I wouldn't object to the latter.

I'm not familiar with koj (they seem to use okurigana in some entries?) but they have 流行 for はやり. they also have 流行歌　はやりうた and 
流行言葉	はやりことば:
流行歌	78016
流行り歌	2882

流行言葉　	5231
流行り言葉	8957

G n-grams:
擦り寄る	11780
すり寄る	 6100
すりよる	 2208
擦寄る	  107
摩り寄る	No matches
摩寄る	No matches

reordering

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>摩り寄る</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14 +11 @@
-<keb>摩寄る</keb>
+<keb>擦寄る</keb>
@@ -17 +14,4 @@
-<keb>擦寄る</keb>
+<keb>摩り寄る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摩寄る</keb>

G n-grams:
実入りのいい	1003
実入のいい	No matches

Always 実入り according to the refs.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>実入</keb>

お人好し	98430	57.0%
お人よし	72567	42.0%
御人好し	1791	1.0%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

I think it's better to split here.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御人好し</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>good-naturedness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -17 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>softhearted (good-natured, credulous) person</gloss>
+<gloss>good-natured person</gloss>
+<gloss>credulous person</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>simple soul</gloss>
@@ -20 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>simple soul</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>

Probably not.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daijr 
売れっ子	194021
売れっ妓	714

is it adj at all?

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>売れっ妓</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>売れっ妓 was sometimes used for geisha</s_inf>

daij, gg5, prog

Not [adj-na].

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>popular figure</gloss>
+<gloss>person in demand</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>popular person</gloss>

OK

yes, 手技[てわざ] is a thing

based on koj's combined entry, a restriction is perhaps too strict, but kojien is also less strict about its separation of 業 and 技 than we are.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手技</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17,2 @@
+<stagk>手わざ</stagk>
+<stagk>手業</stagk>
@@ -15 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1327440">手技・しゅぎ</xref>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 手技</s_inf>

てわさ【手技】
daijs: 柔道で、主に腕や手先の働きによって相手を投げ倒す技。
meikyo: "柔道で、主に腕を使って相手を投げ倒す技。"
https://www.judo-ch.jp/dictionary/terms/tewaza/
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/投技#投技の分類

Daijs, koj and meikyo have 手技/てわざ. That's why I merged submission 2834008 with this entry.
Koj has a combined 手業・手技 entry with both these senses. Daijs and Meikyo only have the judo sense for 手技/てわざ.
I think the note was correct. See links above.

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I'm suggesting:
(a) dropping 手技 from this entry. None of the major references have it read てわざ. The Kokugos only have it as しゅぎ.
(b) dropping the note from sense 2. None of the references have a martial arts explanation for 手技.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>手技</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -17,2 +13,0 @@
-<stagk>手わざ</stagk>
-<stagk>手業</stagk>
@@ -19,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1327440">手技・しゅぎ</xref>
@@ -26 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 手技</s_inf>

手業	7398
手技	336394 (but also read as "しゅぎ", perhaps more commonly)
手わざ	9779

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手わざ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<stagk>手わざ</stagk>
@@ -16 +20 @@
-<gloss>work using the hands</gloss>
+<gloss>handcraft</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>short and repeated (movements; e.g. trembling, stepping quickly)</gloss>
+<gloss>short and repeated (movements; e.g. trembling, quick steps)</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>short and repeated (movements) (e.g. trembling, stepping quickly)</gloss>
+<gloss>short and repeated (movements; e.g. trembling, stepping quickly)</gloss>

gg5, daijr

I think this is neater.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>chopping finely</gloss>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>doing something repeatedly over a short interval (trembling, stepping quickly, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>short and repeated (movements) (e.g. trembling, stepping quickly)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>gradual</gloss>

gg5, prog

I think "scum" has the wrong connotations.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>scum of the earth</gloss>
-<gloss>monster</gloss>
-<gloss>fiend</gloss>
+<gloss>utter villain</gloss>
+<gloss>atrocious fiend</gloss>
+<gloss>devil</gloss>

daij

"scoundrel" sounds a little too weak, I thought

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>scoundrel</gloss>
+<gloss>scum of the earth</gloss>
+<gloss>monster</gloss>
+<gloss>fiend</gloss>

Not sure 大マジメ is needed.

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>大真面目</re_restr>
-<re_restr>大まじめ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おおマジメ</reb>
-<re_restr>大マジメ</re_restr>

G n-grams - see above

adding katakana

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大マジメ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>大真面目</re_restr>
+<re_restr>大まじめ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おおマジメ</reb>
+<re_restr>大マジメ</re_restr>

daij, gg5

Not a noun. Not [yoji]

@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>deadly earnest</gloss>

ngrams

大まじめ	1252
大真面目	2741
大マジメ	288

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大まじめ</keb>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams
  クソ真面目	14446
  くそ真面目	 6787
  くそまじめ	 5681
  糞真面目	 3371
  クソまじめ	 3101
  くそマジメ	 2692
  クソマジメ	 2008
  糞マジメ	  686
  糞まじめ	  458

not a noun
not a yoji

@@ -4,0 +5,6 @@
+<keb>クソ真面目</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くそ真面目</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +13,10 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>糞マジメ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>糞まじめ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クソまじめ</reb>
+<re_restr>クソ真面目</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +25,11 @@
+<re_restr>くそ真面目</re_restr>
+<re_restr>糞真面目</re_restr>
+<re_restr>糞まじめ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くそマジメ</reb>
+<re_restr>糞マジメ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クソマジメ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,2 +38,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +40,2 @@
+<gloss>serious to a fault</gloss>
+<gloss>humorless</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

流行りっ子	No matches
流行りっこ	No matches
はやりっ子	No matches ← saw like this in daijs 類語 list in its アイドル entry
流行っ子	138
流行っこ	No matches

流行っ妓	No matches
流行りっ妓	No matches

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はやりっ子</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

daij, koj
G n-grams:
流行っ子	        138
流行りっ子	No matches

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>流行りっ子</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16,8 @@
+<gloss>star</gloss>
+<gloss>favourite</gloss>
+<gloss>favorite</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>also written 流行っ妓, 流行りっ妓</s_inf>
+<gloss>popular geisha</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>going in and out of style</gloss>

n-grams

@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>流行りすたり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はやり廃り</keb>

gg5

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>standing throws</gloss>
+<gloss>standing throw</gloss>

koj daijr

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>立技</keb>
@@ -12 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>standing throw in judo</gloss>
+<field>&MA;</field>
+<gloss>standing techniques (judo, wrestling)</gloss>
+<gloss>standing throws</gloss>

G n-grams:
遺憾に堪えない	735
遺憾にたえない	1939

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>遺憾にたえない</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>really regrettable</gloss>
+<gloss>deeply regrettable</gloss>

G n-grams:
威張り腐る	288
威張りくさる	346
いばりくさる	130

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>威張りくさる</keb>
+</k_ele>

G n-grams: 952

A+B. Not in the refs. Uncommon.

This is probably sufficient.

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<gloss>changeup</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">unexpectedly slow pitch designed to deceive the batter</gloss>
+<gloss>changeup (pitch)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changeup

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>pitch that comes toward the batter at a speed slower than expected</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">unexpectedly slow pitch designed to deceive the batter</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -10,1 +11,1 @@
-<gloss>pitch that comes toward the batter at a speed slower than expected (baseball)</gloss>
+<gloss>pitch that comes toward the batter at a speed slower than expected</gloss>

daijs
G n-grams:
打ちひしがれる	14528
打ち拉がれる	466
うちひしがれる	2834

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>打ち拉がれる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打ち拉がれる</keb>

chujiten, prog, meikyo

I don't think we need full-sentence glosses.
I've replaced that sense with another.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2088270">紛れもない・まぎれもない</xref>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>doubtless</gloss>
+<gloss>no doubt</gloss>
@@ -27,3 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>I have no doubt</gloss>
-<gloss>You can depend on it</gloss>
-<gloss>It's a safe bet</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>reliable</gloss>
+<gloss>dependable</gloss>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

not sure it's an int either.  maybe just exp is best

It's not really an [id], is it?

@@ -26,2 +26 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<misc>&id;</misc>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_sauce
https://www.thespruce.com/thai-fish-sauce-nam-pla-overview-
3217088

In my experience, Thai fish sauce is usually just called 
"fish sauce" in English. I've never heard "nam pla" used in 
English.

@@ -12,5 +12,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="tha"/>
-<gloss>nam pla</gloss>
-<gloss>nam plaa</gloss>
-<gloss>num pla</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Thai fish sauce</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="tha">nam pla</lsource>
+<gloss>(Thai) fish sauce</gloss>

daij

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナムプラー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,2 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>nam plaa (Thai)</gloss>
-<gloss>type of fish sauce used in Thai cooking</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="tha"/>
+<gloss>nam pla</gloss>
+<gloss>nam plaa</gloss>
+<gloss>num pla</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Thai fish sauce</gloss>

Entry created

daijr, koj
G n-grams:
剛速球	33541
豪速球	10867

Only 豪速球 is in the kokugos.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>豪速球</keb>

eij

I think think sounds better.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>strong fast ball</gloss>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>blazing fastball</gloss>

Entry created

koj

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>革む</keb>

koj, daij, etc.

not abbr.  not v5m.  could possibly apply to all four senses of 改める.  oubunsha kogo jiten has it applying to these two only

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +20,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1200750">改める・3</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to examine</gloss>
+<gloss>to check</gloss>
+<gloss>to inspect</gloss>
+</sense>

synching

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1200750">改める</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1200750">改める・1</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to change</gloss>
+<gloss>to alter</gloss>
@@ -16 +18 @@
-<gloss>to change</gloss>
+<gloss>to replace</gloss>

Entry created

eij

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>defective item</gloss>
+<gloss>defective product</gloss>

Entry created

Bulk update: Replace n-t with n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

G n-grams:
朝一	1012753
朝イチ	179620

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>朝一</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あさイチ</reb>
+<re_restr>朝イチ</re_restr>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>朝イチ</keb>

daijr: 〔俗語〕

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

daijs koj

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

実用日本語表現辞典: " .... かな漢字変換ソフトでは「弄繰り回す」の文字が候補として出るが、一般的には「弄くり回す」の仮名遣いで用いる"

I think it's wrong, and a juxtaposition of 弄 + 繰り回す. The high n-gram count is from IME software producing it for いじくりまわす. The ref above explains it.

G n-grams:
いじくり回す	4025
弄繰り回す	1572
弄くり回す	514
弄くりまわす	216
いじくりまわす	5074

considering how common 弄繰り回す is,
should we drop the [iK] and move it to 2nd position?

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いじくり回す</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>いじくり回す</keb>

i think that the 弄繰り version should be marked as iK or ateji.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_view

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>angle of view (rel. to cameras)</gloss>
+<gloss>angle of view (photography)</gloss>

Entry created

Thank you Robin, those comments explained a lot and I will keep that all in mind.  I've only just now seen usage [note] tags here and there, and *just now* realized the "Sense note" field in "advanced search" lets you find existing examples.

The [note] is a better approach than what I did. And sorry, yes, I was as bit uncomfortable calling that gloss [lit].  I will not do that in the future.  

I see the mailing list is posted online, I'll make an effort to read through things and catch up, especially on NG.

GG5: 彼女のことで頭がいっぱいで勉強も手につかない様子だ. It seems that his head is full of her and he is in no mood for studying.
中辞典: 仕事が手につかない cannot settle to (one's) work; be in no mood for work
ルミナス: 手につかない cannot settle down to…

Thanks. I was about to say/do much the same.

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/JMdict:_Next_Generation#Entry-wide_Inflection_Pattern_Elements

We use adj-i in cases like this because we want sites/apps to be able to handle inflected forms. Separating inflectional information from PoS tags is something that's been proposed for JMdict: NG. See the link above.
I think ellipses used in conjunction with a note help to show how this expression is used.
Transitivity tags are not used on expressions.
手がつかない would need to be a separate entry.
A lit gloss should be a word-for-word translation. It wouldn't be helpful here.

@@ -12,8 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>手がつかない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>手が付かない</keb>
@@ -27 +19 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>unable to focus (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">(something) fails to hold one's attention</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...が〜 or ...も〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>unable to focus on ... (due to being preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to concentrate on ...</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to settle down to ...</gloss>

Small change, I think "focus" is a better gloss for the meaning I've suggested. "unable to focus on work" vs. "unable to concentrate on work", this is mostly stylistic, I think, but google counts seem to roughly support this intuition.

If this were treated as [vi], it really should be "to be unable to focus". And perhaps
 [lit] (said of something) to not hold one's attention

If this is merely [adj-i], how do we get from here to 仕事が手につきません...

======

sankoku and daijs both use 集中 (concentration (on a task); focusing one's attention)
nikk uses 身が入らない　（can't:  to give one's everything; to make one's best effort; to be enthused; to put your back into it​）

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>unable to concentrate (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to focus (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>

gg5, daij

Added sense.
Aligned sense 1 glosses with 車上狙い.
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -16,3 +16,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1718760">車上</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1718760">車上</xref>
-<gloss>stealing from vehicles</gloss>
+<gloss>vehicle burglary</gloss>
+<gloss>theft from a vehicle</gloss>
+<gloss>stealing valuables from an unattended car</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>person who steals from a vehicle</gloss>

Entry created

https://www.cio.com/article/3050836/developer/why-its-time-to-learn-cobol.html

COBOL is far from dead

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>entry</gloss>
+<gloss>entry (COBOL)</gloss>

Most Google hits are to do with COBOL. 
Can we delete it (or make the gloss more descriptive)?

Entry created

No. Very A+B.

Most Google results have nothing to do with computing.
Should we keep this?

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

I think it can. Can't see why it was added. I'll add マジメ to the 真面目 entry.

Surely this can go? Just 真面目 + さ.

G n-grams:
真面目さ	50153
まじめさ	17384
マジメさ	 5942

adding katakana
not uk

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マジメさ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>obeedingly</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Sorry, meant to write "obediently", I guess. I 
added [n] because it can be used as 〜の but 
exp works too. Adv-to is probably better than 
adv. "softly" is broad but not too broad, to 
my mind.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>without making waves</gloss>
+<gloss>obeedingly</gloss>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>obeedingly</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">(like) a willow in the wind</gloss>

"obeedingly"?? No such word.
I think the gloss on 柳に風 "handling things without making waves; taking in one's stride" is probably closer. "softly" is a bit vague. Also "exp,adv-to"?

daijr:柳に風 
逆らわず、おだやかにあしらう。風に柳。 「 －と受け流す」

柳に風 should be aligned with this one if this edit goes 
through.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>Soft words pacify wrath</gloss>
+<gloss>softly</gloss>
+<gloss>obeedingly</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 堰を切ったよう　 │ 19,742 │ 85.7% │ 🡠 (daijs)
│ せきを切ったよう │  1,666 │  7.2% │
│ 堰を切った様　　 │    606 │  2.6% │ 🡠 sK
│ せきを切った様　 │     40 │  0.2% │ 🡠 sK
│ 関を切ったよう　 │    481 │  2.1% │ 🡠 sK
│ 咳を切ったよう　 │     86 │  0.4% │ 🡠 adding
│ せきをきったよう │    417 │  1.8% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +20,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>咳を切ったよう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think so

Helpful?

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">like breaking a dam</gloss>

G n-grams:
せきを切る	57
堰を切る	        1489

Swapping order.
I don't think the "gush forth" part is necessary.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>せきを切る</keb>
+<keb>堰を切る</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>堰を切る</keb>
+<keb>せきを切る</keb>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to break a dam and gush forth</gloss>
+<gloss>to break a dam</gloss>

Entry created

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-chain_compound

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>chain compound</gloss>
-<gloss>open chain compound</gloss>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>open-chain compound</gloss>
+<gloss>acyclic compound</gloss>

Entry created

daijs

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>屁放虫</keb>

GG5, G n-grams:
屁ひり虫	55
放屁虫	142
へひりむし	48
ヘヒリムシ	<20

I see GG5 puts bombardier beetle and Pheropsophus jessoensis in different senses.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>屁ひり虫</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヘヒリムシ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2464190">屁っ放り虫・へっぴりむし・1</xref>

Entry created

(I agree this is better)

I don't think that works. A expl gloss should be a wordy gloss. I think we can drop "as a postscript".

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>used as a postscript</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used to poke fun at people describing their ideal partner</s_inf>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">poking fun at people describing their ideal partner</gloss>

Maybe this is a better balance.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>phrase used to poke fun at people describing their ideal partner, as a postscript</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used as a postscript</s_inf>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">poking fun at people describing their ideal partner</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>phrase used to poke fun at people describing their ideal partner, as a postscript</s_inf>
@@ -15 +16,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">phrase poking fun at people describing their ideal male partner, as a postscript</gloss>

Hmm. Well, it won't match in most text searches.

daij

daij

Aligning with 1760620.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>scum of the earth</gloss>
-<gloss>monster</gloss>
-<gloss>fiend</gloss>
+<gloss>utter villain</gloss>
+<gloss>atrocious fiend</gloss>
+<gloss>devil</gloss>

daij

gg5, daij, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1487360">膝頭</xref>
+<gloss>kneecap</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

wiki etc.

G n-grams: 1701

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&MA;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/当身

gg5, daijr, koj

Merged with 1699230.

koj daijr

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2834060">弱冷房車・じゃくれいぼうしゃ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834060">弱冷房車</xref>

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>railway carriage with the air conditioning set to a higher temperature</gloss>
+<gloss>mildly air-conditioned railway carriage</gloss>

daijs jwiki(弱冷房車)
G n-grams:
 弱冷房車	6595
 弱冷車	2079

Don't think so.

老老介護	14844
老々介護	4120

iK?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>老々介護</keb>

gg5 daijs jwiki

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>elderly care by elderly</gloss>
+<gloss>old people providing care for old people (parents, siblings, in-laws, etc.)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/老老介護

daij, koj, eij

I think we don't

daijs

So there's been some back and forth on this, but I'm not 
sure what's current. Are we tagging all foods, dishes etc. 
as [food]?

Transcription of Thai is a complex topic
If someone wants to propose what scheme to use, go ahead

(transliterated as "khâaw man kài" in daijs)

daijs
wiki
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/海南鶏%E
9%A3%AF

daijr

daijs

daijs

daijs

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>Thai hotpot</gloss>

daijs 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_suki

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>kurultai</gloss>
+<gloss>kurultai (political and military council in the Mongol Empire)</gloss>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">political and military council in the Mongol Empire</gloss>

wiki

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="mon"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="mon">khuruldai</lsource>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">military council in the Mongol Empire</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">political and military council in the Mongol Empire</gloss>

daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurultai

Fork

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapati

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>roti (flatbread)</gloss>
+<gloss>roti (unleavened flatbread)</gloss>