G n-grams:

さばさば	44837
サバサバ	79823
さばさばする	126
サバサバする	207
さばさばした	10690
サバサバした	20335
さばさばと	9233
サバサバと	5186

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サバサバ</reb>
+</r_ele>

native informer

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>frank</gloss>
+<gloss>candid</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>frank</gloss>
-<gloss>candid</gloss>

G n-grams:
せかせかと	13456

For consistency's sake I think it's best to stick to adverb glosses. せかせかと usage is fairly common.
Don't need the x-ref.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -12 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1006550">せっかち</xref>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -14,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>restless</gloss>
-<gloss>fidgety</gloss>
+<gloss>restlessly</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>fidgeting</gloss>

G n-grams

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -10,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

gg5

--> noun glosses

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>subordinate</gloss>
+<gloss>lower position</gloss>
+<gloss>subordinate position</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>low-end</gloss>

Let's close this one off for now. It can be revisited if we look more deeply into POSs.

I've kept out of this until now, but I'm in general 
agreement with Robin that here are cases where の is 
truly adjectival, and others where it's clearly not, but 
just an "of", of sorts. 結婚, like Robin mentioned, is a 
good example of the second category. 

There's still some merit to adding "adj-no" as a 
separate sense with separate adjectival glosses for not-
truly-adjectival usage of の in entries like this one, 
like both eij and gg5 do. It's good for reverse 
searches, sure, but more importantly, it's also helpful 
to translators trying to come up with the right English 
term for a Japanese word. 

That said, GG5 usually splits out every PoS, e.g. 
they'll usually lead with noun definitions, followed by 
～な and separate adjectival definitions, ～する, and so 
on. If we're not following their example on splitting n 
and adj-na, etc., I don't think it makes much sense to 
treat adj-no different from any other PoS.

I don't want to expend any more effort on this debate so I'm going to let it go. Feel free to accept the amendment. I just want it on the record that I disagree.

It does feel like no one gets what I'm saying. To me it seems quite obvious that 金融のグローバル化 doesn't demonstrate [adj-no] usage any more than 数学の問題 (mathematical problem) or 企業の体質 (corporate culture) do. They're trivial cases we can forget about.

Gngrams:
金融	19360443	  
金融の	 2406250	 
金融は	  291791
金融を	  218573	  
金融に	　101698
金融で	　101283
金融が	   54581
-------
金融の充実	  695037		
金融の導入	  283717
金融の対象	  264709	  
金融の推進	  215796	  
金融の実状	   49090
金融の審査	   39721

The ngrams support [adj-no]

GG5: 金融の monetary; financial; credit
・金融のグローバル化 financial globalization
・金融の中心地 a 「financial [moneylending, banking] center.
リーダーズ+プラス: monetary: ...,金融の,...
研究社ビジネス英和辞典: monetary ...,金融の,...
Eijiro: 金融の {形} : financial●monetary
・金融のガバナンス : financial governance
・金融のグローバル化 : financial globalization
many more
Tatoeba: ご存知のように、東京は世界の金融の中心地だ。 Tokyo, as you know, is one of the financial centers of the world.

After 3 months this needs some resolution.
I'm in the adj-no camp on this, and as the references/examples above show, I think it's pretty clearly in Robin's category 1.
Since it would be good to have reverse lookups for "monetary" and "financial", I'm going to propose a second sense just for adj-no.

@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>monetary</gloss>
+<gloss>financial</gloss>
+<gloss>credit</gloss>
+</sense>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Quadrangle is a specific case. The JEs don't include it.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>quadrangle</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/四角-517182#E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.9E.97.20.E7.AC.AC.E4.B8.89.E7.89.88

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>quadrilateral</gloss>
+<gloss>quadrangle</gloss>

gg5

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>busyness</gloss>

daij, gg5
daijs: "「多忙な（の）身」"

Nothing in the definition about pressure.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>busy</gloss>
-<gloss>pressure of work</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>being very busy</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1786390">大家・たいけ</xref>

GG5, daijr/s

Added senses and glosses.
There's already an entry for sense 3 under たいけ (1786390).
Should we merge them?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>master</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +20,12 @@
+<gloss>authority</gloss>
+<gloss>leading figure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mansion</gloss>
+<gloss>large house</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>rich family</gloss>
+<gloss>distinguished family</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

A deer is a wild animal but not a 猛獣.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>wild animal</gloss>
+<gloss>fierce animal</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>big game</gloss>

daij
G n-grams:
くさび形の	2036
くさび形な	24

Not a 形容動詞.
I think a noun gloss is fine.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -24 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>wedge-shape</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>wedge shape</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

We have these readings in the 楔形文字 entry.
I think "uk" is incorrect, as くさび形 is the most common form.

@@ -12,0 +13,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けっけい</reb>
+<re_restr>楔形</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せっけい</reb>
+<re_restr>楔形</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

籤	39962
鬮	12301
籖	848
くじ	3090081
クジ	349214

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

i forget what the actual "policy" is.  it's not always been used consistently, but i've always tried to use it for 旧字, yes

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

I didn't think [oK] was used for 異体字 or kanji forms that are included in the kokugos.

I usually only see it on 旧字体.

G-ngrams:
  くじを引く	26996
  クジを引く	 5848
  籤を引く	  889
  鬮を引く	No matches
  籖を引く	No matches

adding katakana and [oK]

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クジ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 諌める　 │ 15,999 │ 48.9% │
│ 諫める　 │  6,571 │ 20.1% │
│ 禁める　 │     83 │  0.3% │ - rK (koj, daijr)
│ いさめる │ 10,064 │ 30.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
諌める	15999
諫める	6571
禁める	83
いさめる	10064

reordering

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>諫める</keb>
+<keb>諌める</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>諌める</keb>
+<keb>諫める</keb>

gg5, 中辞典, prog

Expanding.

@@ -20 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to warn not to do something</gloss>
+<gloss>to admonish (someone) for</gloss>
+<gloss>to advise (someone) not to</gloss>
+<gloss>to warn against</gloss>

Yes, it should.

Shouldn't that be [io]?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams:
  取っ手	542790
  把手	 37889
  把っ手	  2726
  取手	404490

reordering and adding [ik]
--------------------
koj and daijs have 取手 = とりで (a city in 茨城県)
daijs has 取手 = 取り手
none of my refs have 取手 = 取っ手

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>把手</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14,3 +16,0 @@
-<keb>把手</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>

OK

新明解国語辞典 第五版
にわかあめ ニハカアメ [4][3]【俄か雨・俄雨】
急に激しく降って来て、すぐやむ雨。

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

俄か雨 is not in the dictionaries.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Demoting.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
忽然と	99721
こつ然と	4871

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>こつ然</keb>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>abrupt</gloss>

Gn-grams:
  オオトカゲ	10770
  おおとかげ	 7318
  大トカゲ 	 4621
  大蜥蜴 	 1439
  大とかげ	  368
  おおトカゲ	No matches

adding forms

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>大トカゲ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大とかげ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おおトカゲ</reb>
+<re_restr>大トカゲ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>大蜥蜴</re_restr>
+<re_restr>大とかげ</re_restr>

gg5
daijr: "三つの苦しみを一身に負っていること。また，その人。特に，盲聾啞である"

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>triple handicap</gloss>
+<gloss>triple handicap (esp. blindness, deafness and mutism)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>unseasoned wood</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>生疵</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>fresh bruises or wounds</gloss>
+<gloss>fresh wound</gloss>
+<gloss>fresh bruise</gloss>

ああ言えばこう言う	8136
ああ言えばこう言うやつ	< 20
GG5, etc.

I think the "id" was fine.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to be always ready with excuses</gloss>
+<gloss>to contradict everything</gloss>

can be used attributively (?) as
ああ言えばこう言うやつ
so "verb" rather than "exp" seems informative

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<gloss>to have a comeback (i.e. a reason, or rationalization) for every remark</gloss>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<gloss>to have a comeback for every remark</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

G n-grams:
 どら焼きを	23496
 ドラ焼きを	 5264
 どら焼を  	 1413
 ドラ焼を  	  267
 銅鑼焼きを	   72
 銅鑼焼を  	   35
 どらやきを	 4152
 ドラやきを	  418
 ドラヤキを	  435

covering all possibilities

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ドラ焼</keb>
@@ -28,0 +32,5 @@
+<re_restr>ドラ焼</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドラヤキ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

I don't much like the "castella (sponge cake) patties". I know the Wikipedia page has "pancake-like patties", but to me they are really just sweet pancakes. Tsuji's authoritative "Japanese Cooking: A Simple Art" has "a sandwich of two small pancakes". Most of the many recipes you can find online just refer to them as pancakes. "Patties" sound odd to me for something sweet.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1610570">餡こ・あんこ・1</xref>
@@ -34 +35 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">dessert made of two castella (sponge cake) patties and red bean jam</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">dessert sandwich of two small sweet pancakes and red bean paste</gloss>

WWW hits, jwiki

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ドラ焼き</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21,8 @@
+<re_restr>どら焼き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>どら焼</re_restr>
+<re_restr>銅鑼焼き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>銅鑼焼</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドラやき</reb>
+<re_restr>ドラ焼き</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +32 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

G n-grams:
 どら焼き	318390
 どら焼	 42390
 銅鑼焼き	  1358
 銅鑼焼	   974

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>どら焼</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>どら焼</keb>

I was going to suggest deleting this but it's common on toilet doors so probably worth keeping.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>busy</gloss>
-<gloss>in the middle (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>in use</gloss>
+<gloss>occupied (e.g. toilet)</gloss>
+<gloss>engaged</gloss>

Entry created

daijs koj

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

実用日本語表現辞典: " .... かな漢字変換ソフトでは「弄繰り回す」の文字が候補として出るが、一般的には「弄くり回す」の仮名遣いで用いる"

I think it's wrong, and a juxtaposition of 弄 + 繰り回す. The high n-gram count is from IME software producing it for いじくりまわす. The ref above explains it.

G n-grams:
いじくり回す	4025
弄繰り回す	1572
弄くり回す	514
弄くりまわす	216
いじくりまわす	5074

considering how common 弄繰り回す is,
should we drop the [iK] and move it to 2nd position?

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いじくり回す</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>いじくり回す</keb>

i think that the 弄繰り version should be marked as iK or ateji.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Just [noun] + 中. Not in the refs.

Entry created

yes, these entries were not vetted before adding, so there's a bunch of really bad ones and we've been in the process of "manually curating" them, in the sense of "whenever you see one that is obviously junk, remove it".

the other range of crap entries is a large batch in the high 18xxxxx and low 19xxxxx range that seem to me as if they were mostly taken from example constructions in waei dictionaries with no consideration of whether they belong as headwords or not.

On 2008-05-24 about 11,500 computer related entries were added to jmdict.
Many of them are obsolete or A+B.
About 600 of them have been deleted, often with the justification that they are "edictisms".
Maybe it is best to simply leave these entries as they are.

A+B.

Entry created

G n-grams:
自分探しする	255
自分探しをする	2913
自分探しして	951
自分探しをして	6424

I don't think this should be vs. 〜をする is significantly more common. Not vs in the refs.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>journey of self- discovery</gloss>
+<gloss>journey of self-discovery</gloss>

google

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>journey of self-discovery</gloss>
+<gloss>journey of self- discovery</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/boccia

Petanque is a different sport. I don't think the x-ref is needed.
A short explanation would probably be helpful, though.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2187590">ペタンク</xref>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<gloss>boccia</gloss>
+<gloss>boccia (sport, similar to bocce, played by people with impaired motor skills)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2187590">ペタンク</xref>
+<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>

daijs

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Boccia</gloss>
+<gloss>boccia</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ボッチャ

Sorry, I misread "possibly" as "probably".
I could go either way. I probably wouldn't bother adding them but there's also no harm in having them.

I meant that while I was happy to add them, I wouldn't mind if they weren't there.

Are you saying they should be added or not?

くさびを打ち込む	1572	34.7%
楔を打ち込む	2821	62.4%
くさびを打ちこむ	41	0.9% <- possibly not worth adding as sK
楔を打ちこむ	70	1.5%  <- possibly not worth adding as sK
くさびをうちこむ	20	0.4%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>楔を打ち込む</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,6 @@
-<keb>楔を打ち込む</keb>
+<keb>楔を打ちこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くさびを打ちこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think a lit gloss on the first sense is sufficient.
I don't think 楔を刺す and 釘を刺す are always interchangeable.
楔を差す is in chujiten and prog.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>くさびを刺す</keb>
+<keb>楔を刺す</keb>
@@ -8 +8,9 @@
-<keb>楔を刺す</keb>
+<keb>楔を差す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くさびを刺す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くさびを差す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1871830">釘を刺す</xref>
@@ -19,8 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to make sure of</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2834064">楔を打ち込む</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss g_type="lit">to drive a wedge (into, between)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make sure (of)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to drive in a wedge</gloss>

くさびを刺す	0      not [uk] (book search, twitter confirms)
楔を刺す	33	0.3%   This expression
釘を刺す	11144	99.7%  Related figurative expression (also literal nail-driving)
楔を打ち込む	2821   Related literal expression (also figurative wedge-driving)

Compare daijs definitions for the two (different wording, same end-result, both making sure promises do not fall through):
釘を刺す  約束違反や言い逃れができないように念を押す。釘を打つ。「他言するなと―・される」
楔を刺す  後日問題が起こらないように、しっかりと約束を確かめる。念をおす。

book examples: drive a wedge into my brain:
僕の脳裏にくさびを刺して行くた
literal woodworking:
木材が浮いている部分があればくさびを刺して釘を打つ 
literal stoneworking:
そこにくさびを刺して、金づちで叩き込んで石を切り取った

driving a wedge between politicians:
本楔を刺して置こうとゆう構想ではあるまいか?。二、国内的にはマレンコフとフルシチフ

twitter: "drives a stake into...someone's delusion" (threatens, kills)
 そして、同時に「オタクのすべてがそうではない」と、山本氏の「オタク犯罪者予備軍説」の虚妄に楔を刺してもいます。 政治家らしい、実にバランスの

daijs absolutely gives [1].  However, searching for google book results, and twitter, gives the more common English meaning "drive a wedge into".  Can't find figurative uses outside of reference books.

Hunting for answers, I found a question about 「釘を刺す」vs 「楔を刺す」, which specifically gives an idiomatic meaning for「釘を刺す」, and a literal meaning for 「楔を刺す」.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14188525574
楔は「打つ」です。楔は敵の中に割り込んでその勢力を二分する。自分の勢力を拡大する足掛かりを他の勢力に中に作ること。
「釘を刺す」はあとで食い違いが出ないように相手に念を押すこと。

I realize this is anecdotal, and maybe "wrong", but it still reflects the obscurity of this entry.

釘を刺す on the other hand seems to mean approximately the same thing as [1], and probably a similar etymology.
https://proverb-encyclopedia.com/kugiwosasu/ 

listed as 類語 here(granted, not exactly the same, perhaps):
https://kotowaza-dictionary.jp/k1318/

This expression is [rare] no matter what glosses we give it.  But I submit that it is so rare, that it is now applied more frequently using the literal 'drive a wedge' meaning, than for whatever archaic idiomatic meaning it might have had.

"くさびを刺す" returns 2 non-dictionary book results, even fewer than with kanji.  Does not appear to be [uk]. More common on twitter as kanji as well. 0 ngrams as kana.

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1871830">釘を刺す</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +20,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834064">楔を打ち込む</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to drive a wedge (into, between)</gloss>

gg5, daij

daijr
G n-grams:
爆上げ	40089	  
爆上げし	7410

gg5(ずぶ) koj(ずぶ) daijs(ずぶ) eij

Aligning with the JMdict entry

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>たいぺい</reb>
+<reb>タイペイ</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Taipei</gloss>
+<gloss>Taipei (Taiwan)</gloss>

Merging.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たいほく</reb>
+</r_ele>

Merged.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

リーダーズ+プラス

It occurs in two sentences. Reindexing.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>1366810</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>superhuman</gloss>
+<misc>&work;</misc>
+<gloss>More Than Human (1953 novel by Theodore Sturgeon)</gloss>

?