@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>thank you for your hard work</gloss>
+<gloss>thank you (for your hard work)</gloss>

@@ -30,2 +30,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様・1</xref>

daijs
文化庁が発表した平成17年度「国語に関する世論調査」では、（1）自分より職階が上の人に「お疲れ様（でした）」を使う人が69.2パーセント、「ご苦労様（でした）」を使う人が15.1パーセント。また、（2）自分より職階が下の人に「お疲れ様（でした）」を使う人が53.4パーセント、「ご苦労様（でした）」を使う人が36.1パーセントという結果が出ている。 

daijr

 〔「お疲れさまです（でした）」は同輩や目上の人にも使えるが、「ご苦労様です（でした）」は上位の者から下位の者に対して用いられる〕

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<s_inf>usu. to one's equals or subordinates</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. to one's subordinate</s_inf>

meikyo, daij

@@ -31 +31,2 @@
-<s_inf>used by people with a higher status</s_inf>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. to one's equals or subordinates</s_inf>

My teacher mentioned only higher ups use this, and it is very rude to address higher ranked people this way.

@@ -29,0 +30,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1002570">お疲れ様</xref>
+<s_inf>used by people with a higher status</s_inf>

颯と	2216
さっと	1138224

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -7,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>颯っと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/20924/
「わ！お皿がピカピカだ！全部食べたの！？すごいね！」


https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14231568264
毎日ピカピカ食べたらデザートあると言っているのに、

残しても、デザート食べるーと言います。

お腹いっぱいなんでしょ？それに、ごはんピカピカじゃないからないよーと言うと泣きます。

better xref target for ピッカリン.
maybe adv also

@@ -40,0 +41,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>cleaned (of a plate, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>finished</gloss>

ピカピカ	1081856
ぴかぴか	290753
ピッカピカ	131811
ぴっかぴか	23355
ビカビカ	14758
びかびか	1366
ピッカピカ光る	27
ビカビカ光る	711

ピッカピカ/ぴっかぴか seems to be a more emphatic version too, and should be included somewhere.
I'll propose adding them here, but I wouldn't mind if they were split off.

@@ -11,0 +12,12 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピッカピカ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぴっかぴか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ビカビカ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びかびか</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +31 @@
+<s_inf>ピッカピカ and ビカビカ are more emphatic</s_inf>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12105692267

examples:
"繁華街とはどういう意味ですか?" "ネオンビカビカの、欲望の町です。" 
"なにより、晴天の日にビカビカの車で出掛けると気持ちがいいですよ。"

I've just encountered ビカビカ, which seems to be a colloquial (and possibly more emphatic?) form of ピカピカ. Should that be added to this entry or should it be a new entry?

オーピー is now [sk] and not technically associated with the ＯＰ form
We can't use オー・ピー since nakaguro symbols break the formatting in the XML version

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・1</xref>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・2</xref>

See discussion on 2833798.

@@ -13,0 +14,13 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・1</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>opening credits</gloss>
+<gloss>title sequence</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>theme song (played during the opening credits of a TV show, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

Splitting off "ruff" (different source).

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -26,4 +26,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>ruff</gloss>
-</sense>

is abbr?

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1139510">ラフスケッチ</xref>

daijr/s

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>ruff</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, etc.

i really don't think splitting the adj-na is necessary.  the english 'rough' covered them all but 'casual'.

@@ -10,2 +10,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>rough (to the touch)</gloss>
+<gloss>rough</gloss>
@@ -15,12 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>rough (violent behavior)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>rough (plan)</gloss>
-<gloss>inexact</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>

ループもの	1327 (in wiki: genre of things based on this trope such as Groundhod Day)
タイムループ	671
時間のループ	585
https://www49.atwiki.jp/aniwotawiki/pages/8985.html
ループ(ジャンル)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/恋はデジャ・ブ
"タイムトラベル物語のうちの「ループもの」の代表的な作品である"

@@ -24,0 +25,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>time loop</gloss>
+<gloss>temporal loop</gloss>
+</sense>

ugh.  maybe just "loop" is enough

Daijr, GG5, 中辞典, etc.

Used in all sorts of contexts.

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<gloss>loop</gloss>
+<gloss>band</gloss>
+<gloss>ring</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>loop</gloss>
-<gloss>ring network</gloss>
+<gloss>loop (programming)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>loop (railway line)</gloss>

I think the second gloss is wrong. It's not in gg5.

8-)}

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>dong single-handed</gloss>
+<gloss>doing single-handed</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>a move (in go, shogi, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>one move (in go, shogi, etc.)</gloss>

daijr, daijs

Redid entry.
"いっしゅ" reading isn't in my refs.

@@ -10,3 +10,21 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いっしゅ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one's own effort</gloss>
+<gloss>doing single-handedly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>a game (of go, shogi, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>a match</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>a dance</gloss>
+<gloss>a (musical) composition</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>a company (e.g. of soldiers)</gloss>
+<gloss>a group</gloss>
+<gloss>a party</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -17,4 +34,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>one's own effort</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -24,0 +25,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to deduce</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>to conclude</gloss>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Rgo_RjDOM

Example above.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>きつ音</keb>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>stuttering</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 言い出す │ 484,898 │ 94.1% │
│ 言いだす │  27,636 │  5.4% │
│ 言出す　 │     532 │  0.1% │
│ 云いだす │     362 │  0.1% │
│ 云い出す │   1,722 │  0.3% │
│ 云出す　 │      68 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>云い出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +20,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>云いだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>云出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Forgot to correct this.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>to being to say</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to say</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to being to say</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +27,9 @@
-<gloss>to speak</gloss>
-<gloss>to tell</gloss>
+<gloss>to broach (a matter)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring up</gloss>
+<gloss>to come out with</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to be the first to say</gloss>
+<gloss>to suggest (doing)</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +36,0 @@
-<gloss>to suggest</gloss>
-<gloss>to break the ice</gloss>

copied note from ご苦労様

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>thank you for your hard work</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. to one's subordinate</s_inf>
+<gloss>thank you (for your hard work)</gloss>

OK

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijr, daijs

I think this matches the kokugo entries more closely.
There's a 3rd [adj-na] sense but I'm not sure how to translate it.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>御苦労</keb>
+<keb>ご苦労</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ご苦労</keb>
+<keb>御苦労</keb>
@@ -14 +14,8 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1244680">苦労</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1244680">苦労・1</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>trouble (I have put you through)</gloss>
+<gloss>(your) hard work</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -16,3 +23,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<gloss>trouble (I have put you through)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005030">ご苦労さま</xref>
+<gloss>thank you for your hard work</gloss>
+<gloss>I appreciate your efforts</gloss>

mk

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +21,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, wisdom, eij

@@ -13,3 +13,8 @@
-<gloss>drawing (figures)</gloss>
-<gloss>construction (in geometry)</gloss>
-<gloss>drafting</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing a figure</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing a diagram</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&geom;</field>
+<gloss>construction</gloss>

gg5

--> singular form

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sister cities</gloss>
+<gloss>sister city</gloss>
+<gloss>twin town</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Just trimming a little.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Imperial loyalist samurai of the Bakumatsu-era</gloss>
+<gloss>imperial loyalist samurai of the Bakumatsu-era</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>patriot(s)</gloss>
-<gloss>"men of high purpose"</gloss>
+<gloss>patriots</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/志士-73179
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/96064/meaning/m0u/志
%E5%A3%AB/

This term overwhelmingly refers to the movement of lower 
ranked Samurai active in the anti-Shogunate 尊王攘夷 
movement, and even when it is used otherwise it is usually 
in reference to them, despite its classical Chinese roots. 
It is deeply misleading to present it as a generic term for 
"patriot".

@@ -16,2 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>patriot</gloss>
-<gloss>public-spirited person</gloss>
+<gloss>Imperial loyalist samurai of the Bakumatsu-era</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>patriot(s)</gloss>
+<gloss>"men of high purpose"</gloss>
+<gloss>idealists willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the nation</gloss>

meikyo:
シカ科の哺乳類の総称.  (= cervid)

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>cervid</gloss>

kanji is probably more common

@@ -26,0 +26,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シカ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

I think we should lead with the counter sense. It's by far the most common sense.

@@ -11,4 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
-<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>counter for laps or circuits</gloss>
@@ -22,3 +20,4 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
-<gloss>counter for laps or circuits</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, c. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Zhou (dynasty of China)</gloss>
-<gloss>Chou</gloss>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, c. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<gloss>victory or defeat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>victory or defeat</gloss>

GG5 and 中辞典 point at 親類 for which they (as we) have singular glosses. ルミナス has singular glosses too.

I think I prefer to stay with the singular glosses here.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>relatives</gloss>
-<gloss>family</gloss>
+<gloss>relative</gloss>
+<gloss>relation</gloss>

Relatives: 820  (while the singular has many matches, manually scrolling through entries, plural seems much more prevalent)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/親族#relatives

Family: 161
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/親族#family

Kin: (120)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/親族#kin

eijiro:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=親族
blood kin
family（血族である）
kin
kindred〔【用法】複数扱い〕
kinsfolk〈米・古〉
relation
rellie〈豪俗〉〔【同】relative〕
rels〈豪俗〉〔【同】relative〕
sib〔集合的〕

daijs: blood or marriage...
１ 血縁関係・婚姻関係のある人々。親類。親戚 (しんせき) 。
２ 民法上、六親等内の血族および配偶者と、三親等内の姻族。

Undoing singular-form edit. (族 is exceptional)

Wikipedia xref is actually to "Kinship", or I probably wouldn't have thought to include "kin".  But eijiro also has it.  

I don't think "relation" really fits here (except as a longer "blood relation"), and it's practically absent on reverso:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/親族#relation

@@ -18,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>relative</gloss>
-<gloss>relation</gloss>
+<gloss>relatives</gloss>
+<gloss>family</gloss>
+<gloss>kin</gloss>

prog

--> singular form
Not [adj-no].

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>relatives</gloss>
+<gloss>relative</gloss>
+<gloss>relation</gloss>

掃き立て	537
掃立て	312
掃きたて	36  <- in GG5 examples

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掃きたて</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16 +18 @@
-<gloss>being newly swept</gloss>
+<gloss>newly swept (room, etc.)</gloss>

daij, gg5

Splitting.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掃立て</keb>
@@ -12 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>being newly-swept</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>being newly swept</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5, prog

Added sense.
I don't think "gather up" is right.

@@ -17 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>to gather up</gloss>
+<gloss>to clean</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to gather silkworms</gloss>

[geom] has been reinstated.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&math;</field>
+<field>&geom;</field>

I'm doing them all now.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

Jim agreed with my proposal to change all [geom] to [math] and it was done for many entries but nobody finished the job. I was going to do that for over a year but somehow never gotten around to do it.

i think there was some discussion about removing [geom] at one point, but it is still in the docs and there are still 11 entries with the tag, so i assume it is still being used

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&math;</field>
+<field>&geom;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002440">お猪口</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002440">おちょこ</xref>

OK, I think.

gg5, daij
daijs (sense 2): "本膳料理に用いるの形に似た深い器。酢の物や酒のさかななどを盛る"

Added sense. Not sure how detailed to make the gloss.
GG5 and daijr/s redirect from ちょこ to ちょく. Not sure which reading is more common. It's always ちょこ in お猪口.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちょく</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002440">お猪口</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002440">お猪口・1</xref>
@@ -18 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>small cup</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>small deep porcelain bowl for serving food</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog

Tidy-up.

@@ -26,3 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>legume (esp. edible legumes or their seeds, such as beans, peas, pulses, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>beans</gloss>
-<gloss>peas</gloss>
+<gloss>legume (esp. edible legumes or their seeds, e.g. beans, peas, pulses)</gloss>
+<gloss>bean</gloss>
+<gloss>pea</gloss>
@@ -50 +50,2 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<gloss>small</gloss>
@@ -52 +53,3 @@
-<gloss>tiny</gloss>
+<gloss>baby</gloss>
+<gloss>midget</gloss>
+<gloss>small-scale</gloss>
@@ -55 +58 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>

WWW hits (e.g. 豚マメ)

Looks fine.

@@ -45,0 +46 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

WWW search for マメ brings up a lot of bean images.

A マメ/まめ entry was proposed for "beef kidney", which maps onto sense 4 here. I'm proposing adding マメ here as an alternative.

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マメ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

With the [vi] tag I think this is sufficient.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>to be warped</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>to be curved</gloss>
-<gloss>to be arched</gloss>
+<gloss>to arch</gloss>
@@ -21 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>to be bent</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* elab “bend backwards” gloss – specifically body part (heard today referring to fingers)
* a few more glosses for “bend, warp” sense

@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to bend</gloss>
+<gloss>to be bent</gloss>
@@ -24,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>to bend (backward)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bend backward (body or body part, e.g. fingers)</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5

Splitting.
I don't think "levitation" is right. It's not in any of the regular EJs and the kokugos explicitly mention water.

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -21 +25,5 @@
-<gloss>levitation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>rising (of rank)</gloss>

JST, I see.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/levitation

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>levitation</gloss>

jwiki

@@ -28,0 +29,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>statement</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>litterature</gloss>
+<gloss>literature</gloss>

No problem with folk, but perhaps not second. "Nation" is ok in contexts like the "Sioux nation", but it doesn't mean a country such as a member of the United Nations. I agree it's probably best not in the glosses.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>folk</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>folk</gloss>

Hi, I noticed that the word "nation" had been removed from this entry.

I do not contest that it is confusing, but I am not quite sure a user of this dictionary would get the correct impression from this entry now.

It would be quite important to state that the sense of the word "people" used here is the one that (in English) can be used in the plural ("peoples"}.

Keeping "nation" would be one way to achieve that.

I have added the word "folk" here, hoping to give a similar effect.

At least in fantasy fiction, it is often quite accurate.

For example, I have captured this screenshot from a game: https://i.imgur.com/VLUxfl3.png

The word as used in thescreenshot could alternatively be translated as "tribe" too.

I cannot say anything about the two other translations given because I have not come across the word often elsewhere.

I hope this is all right with you.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>folk</gloss>

daij

GG5 has "nation" but I think it's confusing.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>nation</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>citizens</gloss>
+<gloss>subjects</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

gg5, prog

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>silkworm raising</gloss>

correction: not 'pongid'

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>pongid</gloss>

kojien: Hominoidea
japanese wikipedia: "ape"
daijr: anthropoid or pongid
daijs: pongid
百科事典マイペディア: pongid or "ape"
世界大百科事典 第２版: anthropoid, pongid, or ape

the supplied definitions are too broad, as they include humans, whereas 類人猿 does not.  also, 'simian' includes monkeys

@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>simian</gloss>
-<gloss>species in the biological infraorder Simiiformes</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>anthropoid</gloss>
+<gloss>pongid</gloss>
+<gloss>ape</gloss>

I believe "類人猿" refers to species in the infraorder Simiiformes, which are currently referred to as "simians" but were once referred to as "anthropoid apes."

@@ -18,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>anthropoid</gloss>
-<gloss>troglodyte</gloss>
+<gloss>simian</gloss>
+<gloss>species in the biological infraorder Simiiformes</gloss>
+<gloss>anthropoid ape</gloss>

All 48 sentences are for sense 1.

daij, gg5, prog
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/列_(数学)

Added senses.
Tough to come up with glosses for sense 2.

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<gloss>row</gloss>
+<gloss>line</gloss>
+<gloss>file</gloss>
+<gloss>column</gloss>
@@ -19,3 +23,12 @@
-<gloss>line</gloss>
-<gloss>row</gloss>
-<gloss>column</gloss>
+<gloss>rank</gloss>
+<gloss>procession</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>company (of someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>group</gloss>
+<gloss>ranks</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
@@ -23,2 +36,4 @@
-<gloss>string</gloss>
-<gloss>train</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>counter for rows</gloss>

Forgot to drop 黄葉.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>黄葉</keb>

Yes, that's what I had in mind.
The refs only have one sense for 紅葉/こうよう and 黄葉/こうよう.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>椛</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -19,2 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>紅葉</re_restr>
-<re_restr>黄葉</re_restr>
@@ -25,4 +18,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>もみじ</reb>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -31,0 +22,4 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2857872">黄葉</xref>
+<gloss>leaves turning red (in autumn)</gloss>
+<gloss>red leaves</gloss>
@@ -34,20 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>leaves changing color (colour)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>紅葉</stagk>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>leaves turning red</gloss>
-<gloss>red leaves</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>黄葉</stagk>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>leaves turning yellow</gloss>
-<gloss>yellow leaves</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2833860">紅葉襲</xref>
-<gloss>layered colors in garments, resembling autumn colors</gloss>

I think the proposed split was a three-way split:
黄葉 [こうよう] leaves turning yellow in the autumn; yellow leaves
紅葉 [こうよう] leaves turning red in the autumn; red leaves
紅葉;黄葉 [もみじ] [1] autumn colours [2] maple [3] layered garments [4] venison
it seems prudent to split out the two こうよう entries, not vice versa

Reopen.

gg5, prog

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>wholesale dealer</gloss>
+<gloss>wholesaler</gloss>

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog

I think "interrupt" and  "cut into (a conversation)" are better as translations for 口を挟む or 言葉を挟む. I've added some more glosses.
I've made a separate sense for "catch (a finger, etc.)" (as in meikyo). It looks a bit out of place in sense 1.
Added a "to harbour" sense (in GG5 and daijs).
The sentences need updating (only 3 are indexed).

@@ -26,4 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to hold between</gloss>
-<gloss>to grip with (from both sides)</gloss>
-<gloss>to nip</gloss>
-<gloss>to catch (e.g. one's finger in a door)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold between (e.g. one's fingers, chopsticks)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grip (from both sides)</gloss>
@@ -41,0 +40,9 @@
+<gloss>to catch (e.g. a finger in a door)</gloss>
+<gloss>to trap</gloss>
+<gloss>to pinch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to insert (e.g. a break into proceedings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to interpose (e.g. an objection)</gloss>
@@ -43,2 +50 @@
-<gloss>to interrupt</gloss>
-<gloss>to cut into (a conversation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw in (e.g. a joke)</gloss>
@@ -49,0 +56 @@
+<gloss>to have between each other</gloss>
@@ -51 +58,6 @@
-<gloss>to have between each other</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to harbour (feelings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cast (e.g. doubt)</gloss>

http://yourei.jp/異論を挟む

異論を挟む
口を挟む
言葉を挟む

@@ -37,0 +38,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +43,2 @@
+<gloss>to interrupt</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut into (a conversation)</gloss>

The sense 1/2 split is subtle. I had trouble aligning examples.

gg5, daij

産み落とす is the more common form.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>産み落とす</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>産み落とす</keb>
+<keb>産み落す</keb>
@@ -20 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>to drop (calf or foal)</gloss>
+<gloss>to drop (a calf, foal, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to lay (an egg)</gloss>

Indeed.

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>word used to start a sentence (e.g. sate, iza, sore)</gloss>
+<s_inf>e.g. さて, いざ, それ</s_inf>
+<gloss>word used to start a sentence</gloss>

perhaps the "e.g." on sense 2 would be better as a note so it can be in kana.  it's confusing because "sate" and "sore" are both english words.

daij

Added sense. Struggling to think of a good gloss.
Added ほつご reading.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほつご</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +18,5 @@
+<gloss>starting to speak</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>word used to start a sentence (e.g. sate, iza, sore)</gloss>

synching

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2527870">奇蹄類</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>even-toed ungulates</gloss>

Way back we were asked by some MT people to avoid leading with parenthesized information. I think it's no longer an issue.

What was wrong with Rene's version?

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
-<gloss>similar figures</gloss>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>similar figures (in geometry)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>(in geometry) similar figures</gloss>
+<field>&geom;</field>
+<gloss>similar figures</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>the sericulture industry</gloss>
+<gloss>sericulture industry</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>dust</gloss>
+<gloss>wind-scattered dust</gloss>
+<gloss>windblown sand</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>cares of life</gloss>

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1005200">さっと</xref>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005200">さっと・1</xref>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005200">さっと・2</xref>

Entry created

G n-grams:

ぱたぱた	81469
パタパタ	242444
ぱたぱたと	17155
パタパタと	58376
ぱたぱた歩く	129
パタパタ歩く	284

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ぱたぱた</reb>
+<reb>パタパタ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>パタパタ</reb>
+<reb>ぱたぱた</reb>

gg5, prog, daij

Expanding.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パタパタ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -11 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>flap (sound of something light and thin such as a fan moving through the air)</gloss>
+<gloss>flapping (of a flag, fan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>fluttering</gloss>
+<gloss>whack-whack (e.g. beating dust out of a rug)</gloss>
+<gloss>whap-whap</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +22,3 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>pitter-patter (sound of light footsteps)</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>pitter-patter (of footsteps)</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +28,4 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>dealing with a situation quickly</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>quickly (making progress)</gloss>
+<gloss>in quick succession</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>person who has successfully fled from North Korea</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has fled from North Korea</gloss>

--> singular form

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>people who have successfully fled from North Korea</gloss>
-<gloss>North Korean defectors</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has successfully fled from North Korea</gloss>
+<gloss>North Korean defector</gloss>

Entry created

wiki, eij

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2166680">歯鯨</xref>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>mysticete</gloss>

Entry created

matching incoming x-ref

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>toothed whale (i.e. a whale of suborder Odontoceti)</gloss>
+<gloss>toothed whale</gloss>
+<gloss>odontocete</gloss>

Entry created

our general rule has been for things that end in 類, to gloss it as plural.  this is not an 'order' name (since cetacea is not an order anymore and this does not end in 目)

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>order Cetacea of toothed marine mammals, including whales and dolphins</gloss>
-<gloss>Cetaceans</gloss>
+<gloss>cetaceans</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2200290">広鼻猿類</xref>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2200280">狭鼻猿類</xref>

Entry created

gg5

Not an abbreviation.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -14,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>monozygotic</gloss>
+<gloss>unioval</gloss>
+<gloss>uniovular</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

gg5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&math;</field>
+<field>&geom;</field>

Entry created

Making losses and POS align.

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -10,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>(of a lie etc.) obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>(of a lie, etc.) obvious</gloss>

大辞泉 + 大辞林

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to be found out</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>(of a lie etc.) obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>transparent</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438290">真猿類</xref>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438280">原猿類</xref>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1712700">偶蹄類</xref>

Entry created

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>Alopias</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">genus of thresher shark</gloss>
+<gloss>Alopias (genus of thresher sharks)</gloss>

Simplification suggested by Rene.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">genus of thresher shark in the family Alopiidae</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">genus of thresher shark</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Alopias (genus of three extant thresher shark species in the family Alopiidae)</gloss>
+<gloss>Alopias</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">genus of thresher shark in the family Alopiidae</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

@@ -9,1 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>polytope (geometry)</gloss>
+<field>&geom;</field>
+<gloss>polytope</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/Polytope
JST, Cross

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&geom;</field>

wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/平面充�
%AB

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

eij
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeycomb_(geometry)

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>honeycomb</gloss>
+<gloss>space-filling</gloss>

wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/平面充�
%AB

Just realized there was a geom tag now

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

Wiki

Japanese Wikip gets the English version wrong.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>Cathalan solid</gloss>
+<gloss>Catalan solid</gloss>

wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カタラ�
%B3%E3%81%AE%E7%AB%8B%E4%BD%93

i don't think that's a real term.  not in gg5 or (today's) wikipedia

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<gloss>opossum shrew</gloss>

GG5, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solenodon

daijr/s: "黄色の土。黄土。"

This isn't a common term. I think these are the only glosses we need for sense 1.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>earth</gloss>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>yellow ochre (ocher)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>yellow ochre</gloss>
+<gloss>yellow ochre (ocher)</gloss>

http://www.beef168.co.jp/wagyu_naizo#mame
http://official.niku-
higasihara.co.jp/contents/chartBeef#beef2-6

seems cuts of meat are most commonly written in katakana, 
regardless of etymology.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サガリ</reb>
+</r_ele>

gg5, 栄養・生化学辞典

probably 下がり, but neither source has kanji

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

koj, gg5, eij

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

eij, gg5
http://cjjc.weblio.jp/content/りんせつへん

Probably did.

According to daijr, it came to Japan via Dutch.

Reopen for a while.

According the OED the word came to Europe via Portuguese and it's from the Guarani (Paraguayan language) "nana".
Bromeliad is sort-of Latin. It's from the Bromelius, the Latinized name of Olaf Bromel, the Swedish botanist.
I'll make the source for this "por"; I don't think we have a code for Guarani.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="lat"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="por"/>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>pineapple</gloss>
+<gloss>pineapple (Ananas comosus)</gloss>

Usually ルミナス is not bad, but in this case it's the only reference for this entry. I think I'll regard it as an aberration and drop it.

in general, is ルミナス a trustworthy source for okurigana, or do they do that thing that nikkoku and old versions of kojien do, where they write all the headwords as kanji-only without any okurigana in them?  (i don't think i've ever looked at ルミナス.)

i feel like it should be 姨捨て, and 姨捨 would be io except in compounds (or names).  i also think 姥捨 might be io in the 姥捨て entry

You're right. I should have looked more closely at the entry.
ルミナス和英辞典 has:
おばすて　姨捨
-> うばすて
The Wikipedia article begins: "Ubasute (姥捨て, "abandoning an old woman", also called obasute ....".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubasute
It's also a locality/station near Nagano.

@@ -6,6 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>伯母捨</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>姨棄</keb>

my copy of daijr doesn't have this.  (only as the name of a noh drama)

Daijr, ルミナス

Approved Jim's amendment.

I've proposed just adding マメ to the 豆/まめ entry. If that's approved, this can be dropped.

isn't this just sense 4 of 豆?

http://www.beef168.co.jp/wagyu_naizo#mame
http://official.niku-
higasihara.co.jp/contents/chartBeef#beef2-6

Daijr

http://www.beef168.co.jp/wagyu_naizo
http://official.niku-
higasihara.co.jp/contents/chartBeef#beef2-11
http://hormones.asia/ツラ（ツ%E
3%83%A9%E3%83%9F%E3%83%BB%E3%83%9B%E3%83%9B%E3%83%8B%E3%82%
AF%EF%BC%89/

Style alignment.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<s_inf>freq. read オープニング</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. read オープニング</s_inf>

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>オーピー</reb>
+<reb>オー・ピー</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>オー・ピー</reb>
+<reb>オーピー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://www.shinkohsha.co.jp/blog/op/
http://printwiki.org/Overprint_Varnish

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -23 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +24,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>overprint</gloss>
+</sense>

OK. I'll try reflecting this in the オープニング entry too.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<s_inf>freq. read オープニング</s_inf>

Daijr seems to be saying so.

Is this really a prt and not a conjugation?

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>(after imperative form of a verb) as if to say</gloss>
+<s_inf>after imperative form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>as if to say</gloss>

I suspect it's rather obscure.

大辞泉・大辞林

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Draught script</gloss>
+<gloss>draft script</gloss>
+<gloss>preparatory version</gloss>

http://tf-tms.jp/glossary/getword.php?w=準備稿（じゅんびこう）

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>delayed effect of advertising, etc.</gloss>

daijs

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>warning or notification especially by means of wireless communications</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>activation of an alarm</gloss>
+<gloss>sounding a warning</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/発報

スーパー大辞林 3.0
たんみん ［0］ 【短眠】
「短時間睡眠」の略。

Daijr doesn't have an entry for 短時間睡眠. KOD has 短時間睡眠者.
I think it has to be just "short sleep" or the equivalent.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see">短時間睡眠</xref>
@@ -14,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>short sleeper</gloss>
-<gloss>person who doesn't need much sleep</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 短時間睡眠</s_inf>
+<gloss>short sleep</gloss>

not in daijr, afaict.  i think maybe it was KOD?

entry for 短時間睡眠 was changed to 短時間睡眠者, so the x-ref no longer exists.  should one be added for it?  does 短眠 mean short sleeping or short sleeper?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833851">短時間睡眠</xref>
+<xref type="see">短時間睡眠</xref>

Daijr: 「短時間睡眠」の略。

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1578780">紅葉・こうよう・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578780">紅葉・こうよう・4</xref>

I think a little clearer.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see">紅葉</xref>
-<gloss>combination of colors from layering garments that resembles autumn colors</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578780">紅葉・6</xref>
+<gloss>layered colors in garments, resembling autumn colors</gloss>

daij koj googimages (http://www.a4orikata.jp/ja/works/ds/0/0/39/)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>layering of garments that mimics the colours of autumn leaves (worn from the 9th to the 11th month of the lunar calendar)</gloss>
+<gloss>layered garments that mimic the colours of autumn leaves (worn from the 9th to the 11th month of the lunar calendar)</gloss>

koj daij

Aligning. I think this is clearer.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>のころも</reb>
+<reb>もみじのころも</reb>
@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833861">紅葉衣</xref>
-<gloss>"mantle of leaves"</gloss>
-<gloss>comparing beautiful autumn leaves to a vestment</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833861">紅葉衣・1</xref>
+<gloss>comparing beautiful autumn leaves to a garment</gloss>

koj daijr

google ngrams:
神の視点	12371
神視点	1163
神の目線	554
神目線	48

522k googits 
神視点    50k
神の目線  198k
神目線  12k
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q1225587207
"神の視点とは？"
"基本的には神の視点も三人称の語りに含まれます
三人称でも特定の登場人物の視点を基準にしている場合があります 
その人物をＡとすれば、Ａ以外の登場人物が考えていることは、わか
らないか、もしくはＡの偏った視点を通してしか読者に伝えられない
仕組みになっています
他方、俗に神の視点と呼ばれるのは、その場に存在しないのに、すべ
ての登場人物の行動や内面の感情の動きを俯瞰的に見て、客観的に叙
述する語り手です 小説内で起こるすべての出来事を上から見渡して
いる様が神のようだから、そう呼ばれるのです"
_
eij on the other hand translates "third person 
omniscient narrator" as
三人称全知話者
全知視点 gets 375 hits
全知の視点 3k
www.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp/~nonami/ppp/1_siten.ppt

we could also add "omniscience" to the 神 entry, I guess

Fair enough. Best avoided.

"彼らは皆、_私の提案に同意した"
"彼らは皆、_私たちに大変親切にしてくれた．"
"all of them _ agreed with my proposal/were very kind to 
us"
皆 isn't connected to 私 here, it's modifying 彼ら
"皆、_私のせいです．"
"皆、_私が悪いのです．"
皆 just means "everything" here. "Everything is my 
fault."

GG5 examples:
彼らは皆私たちに大変親切にしてくれた． They were very kind and considerate to us． ｜ They treated us with great kindness.
皆私のせいです． It's all my fault.
皆私が悪いのです． It's all my fault.
Eijiro: 彼らは皆私の提案に同意した : They all gave the nod to my proposal.

I've wondered about adding this for a while. It's an expression; not a compound, but the meaning is not that clear to beginners.