230k googits

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>意味あい</keb>

gg5

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>shade of meaning</gloss>
+<gloss>connotation</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>pail</gloss>
+<gloss>tub</gloss>

GG5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>conditional form</gloss>

same as 已然形 in classical Japanese

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>hypothetical form (of verbs and adjectives in Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss>hypothetical form (of verbs and adjectives in modern Japanese)</gloss>

daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_grammar

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1634680">已然形・いぜんけい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1634680">已然形・いぜんけい</xref>
@@ -13 +15 @@
-<gloss>hypothetical form</gloss>
+<gloss>hypothetical form (of verbs and adjectives in Japanese)</gloss>

Noted. The #1197000 would have forced the match.

I updated the index string for sentence #93022 from
彼女[01] は がりがりに(#1197000)[03]~ 痩せる[01]{痩せている}
to
彼女[01] は がりがり(#1197000)[03]{がりがりに}~ 痩せる[01]{痩せている}

Although somehow this sentence is showing up correctly in the JMdict_e_examp file even though the index key seemed to be incorrect.

gg5, prog

Yes. Sense 2 as well according to daijr. I'll create a new entry.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>我利我利</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12 +8,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -17 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -21,7 +16,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
-<gloss>thinking of only one thing</gloss>
-<gloss>obsessively</gloss>
+<gloss>scraping</gloss>
+<gloss>scratching</gloss>
@@ -32,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>skin and bones</gloss>
-<gloss>very skinny</gloss>
+<gloss>hard and crunchy</gloss>
@@ -37 +26,4 @@
-<gloss>selfish</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>very skinny</gloss>
+<gloss>emaciated</gloss>
+<gloss>all skin and bones</gloss>

daijs

according to daijs, only sense 4 can be written with kanji
split?

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -16,4 +18,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>skin and bones</gloss>
-<gloss>appearing to be underweight</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>crunching</gloss>
+<gloss>chewing or crushing something hard</gloss>
@@ -23 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>with a grinding, crunching, scratching (sound)</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>thinking of only one thing</gloss>
+<gloss>obsessively</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +30,4 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>desperately</gloss>
-<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>skin and bones</gloss>
+<gloss>very skinny</gloss>
@@ -31,7 +36,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>crunchy hardness</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>selfishness</gloss>
-<gloss>selfish person</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>selfish</gloss>

Bulk convert ling to gramm
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

daijs gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_grammar#Stem_forms

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>plain form (of a Japanese verb or adjective)</gloss>
+<gloss>dictionary form</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog
daijr: "自分のものとして所有すること。「土地を―する」"

Not the same as 専有.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>exclusive possession</gloss>
+<gloss>possession</gloss>
@@ -22 +21 @@
-<gloss>monopolization</gloss>
+<gloss>occupancy</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

Didn't like those glosses.

@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>coming about</gloss>
-<gloss>happening</gloss>
-<gloss>occurring</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>frequent occurrence</gloss>
+<gloss>succession (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>series</gloss>

daij, prog

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>mountain side</gloss>
-<gloss>halfway up</gloss>
+<gloss>halfway up (down) a mountain</gloss>
+<gloss>mountainside</gloss>

〈通（り）／とおり〉〈すぎ／過（ぎ）〉る

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 通り過ぎる　 │ 325,525 │ 87.3% │
│ 通りすぎる　 │  43,611 │ 11.7% │
│ とおり過ぎる │     837 │  0.2% │ - add
│ 通すぎる　　 │     127 │  0.0% │
│ 通過ぎる　　 │     117 │  0.0% │
│ 通り過る　　 │      87 │  0.0% │
│ 通過る　　　 │      26 │  0.0% │
│ とおり過る　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ とおりすぎる │   2,755 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とおり過ぎる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

I think the meaning is a little clearer this way.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to go past</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>to pass through</gloss>
+<gloss>to pass by</gloss>

daijr (昏れる)
gg5

Added glosses.
GG5 has "run out" but I don't see how it fits.

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>昏れる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -25,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to grow dark</gloss>
@@ -30 +34 @@
-<gloss>to end</gloss>
+<gloss>to end (of a day, year, season, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -33 +36,0 @@
-<gloss>to run out</gloss>
@@ -38,2 +41,3 @@
-<gloss>to be sunk (e.g. in despair)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be lost</gloss>
+<gloss>to be sunk in (e.g. despair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be lost in (e.g. thought)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be overcome with</gloss>

GG5

@@ -26,0 +26,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +35,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be sunk (e.g. in despair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be lost</gloss>
+</sense>

Pity it can't be shorter, but I think that works.

Kana (and kanji) can only be used in notes. Not sure it's needed here.
Here's my attempt.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>irrealis form (conjugation used to connect to certain auxiliares, e.g. ～う, ～よう, ～ない, ～ぬ, ～せる, etc)</gloss>
+<gloss>irrealis form (of Japanese verbs and adjectives; used with auxiliaries to form negative, causative, passive and volitional constructions)</gloss>

This kind of puts us back where we were: "of verbs preceding nai" implicates that it is the -a ending stem for godan and the -i ending stem for suru class, and also that 未然形 is a term used for the irrealis form of verbs only. I must also raise the concern that I am not sure how many will actually identify this gloss with those stems, and how many will think it is some other, unheard of inflection that can be done to verbs connected to ない.

Now, do correct me if I am wrong: it seems to me that by relating 未然形 to -nai you hope to give readers a brief understanding of what it is, but we cannot really do that like this or else we will be giving them a wrong definition of it.
For example, the definition of the 連用形 as the -masu stem could be said to be a misnomer given its array of other uses, but it has the sizeable benefit of being a widely-known term that is able to locate all instances of a 連用形. 
That is not the case with the 未然形, calling it the -nai stem and trying to identify it through ～ない will not be able to return 良かろ～う, あろ～う, せ～ぬ, しょ～う or さ～せる; it only identifies a fraction of the 未然形 and it also suggests the fraction to be the whole. 

From here, I think we have 3 options:
1. We leave it as it is, giving them a brief but incomplete and unfortunately inaccurate understanding of the term.
2. Decrease the information: Inform nothing of its use or identification, only of what it is conceptually and leave a translation. This is what I proposed, I think this enables the reader to research the term on their own, avoiding the potential maluses of the first option - or at the very least making so that any misconceptions by the reader will not have this as their origin.
3. Increase the information: expand the gloss so that the scope of the term is clearer. 

The third is what I am now putting forth. I have made it as short as I could due to the preference for short entries, but I think that less in not necessarily better depending on what the goal is, someone reading this proposal will probably still have questions after reading it, but at least they are unlikely to take from it a wrong answer - which I think is the problem with the previous entries.

In any case, the proposal: Expand upon identification by auxiliary with additional auxiliaries that can identify the rest of the 未然形. If the entry for one of these auxiliaries has a note on stem-connection, a cross-reference could be added here to supplement this. Though, presently, some of them have no such notes and those that do are incomplete. よう Could be discarded depending on which understanding of ましょう, しょう, etc. we are going with.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>irrealis form (of verbs preceding nai)</gloss>
+<gloss>irrealis form (conjugation used to connect to certain auxiliares, e.g. ～う, ～よう, ～ない, ～ぬ, ～せる, etc)</gloss>

I think "verbs preceding nai" is very hard to understand.

GG5: 【国文法】 a form of a verb preceding nai; a form of 「a verb [an adjective] preceding the auxiliary verb u.
ルミナス: 〔文法〕 conjugated form where an incomplete action is connoted
Wiktionary:     (grammar) a Japanese verbal inflectional category: the irrealis form - Indicates that something has not yet happened, or not yet begun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_grammar#Stem_forms

Our glosses of the other grammatical XX形:
已然形 realis form (of verbs and adjectives in classical Japanese); perfective form
仮定形 hypothetical form (of verbs and  adjectives in modern Japanese); conditional form
終止形 plain form (of a Japanese verb or adjective); dictionary form; predicative form
命令形 imperative form; command
連用形  continuative form (of a Japanese verb or adjective); conjunctive form; masu stem (of a verb)
連体形 attributive form (of a Japanese verb or adjective)
---
I agree it's not the stem itself, and the "imperfective form" is a bit misleading. I think the mention of "nai" helps.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>irrealis form</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">one of the six conjugations in japanese</gloss>
+<gloss>irrealis form (of verbs preceding nai)</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>unlimited</gloss>
+<gloss>unrestricted</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>attributive form (of a Japanese verb or adjective))</gloss>
+<gloss>attributive form (of a Japanese verb or adjective)</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_grammar#Stem_forms
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/形容詞

"participle adjective" looks weird

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>participle adjective</gloss>
-<gloss>attributive form</gloss>
+<gloss>attributive form (of a Japanese verb or adjective))</gloss>

[iK] -> [io]

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo
損なう	460,746	98.0%	
害う	855	0.2%	
損う	8,772	1.9%	- gg5

Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>to ruin</gloss>
@@ -35 +36 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -37,2 +38,11 @@
-<gloss>to fail to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to miss one's opportunity to ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to fail to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to do amiss</gloss>
+<gloss>to miss one's opportunity to do</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to almost do</gloss>
+<gloss>to come close to doing</gloss>

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

koj

@@ -54,0 +55,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833594">矛山車</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>parade float decorated with long-handled Chinese spears</gloss>
+</sense>

The connection between the usage example and the definitions is not clear. Also, in the book I'm reading, 鉾 alone (i.e. not 鉾山車) seems to be used with the "float" meaning. I wonder whether this should be a separate sense.

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>orange color</gloss>
-<gloss>orange colour</gloss>
+<gloss>orange (color, colour)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Needs restiction. 
It really is a noun, even though  it's mostly adj-no.
A few hits for だいだいしょく too, but not enough to record.

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<re_restr>橙色</re_restr>
@@ -19,0 +20,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,3 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>orange-colored</gloss>
-<gloss>orange-coloured</gloss>
+<gloss>orange color</gloss>
+<gloss>orange colour</gloss>

GG5 genius (〜の)
daijr koj （音読み）

* Add pos [adj-no]
* Add on'yomi

@@ -15,0 +15,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とうしょく</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +19,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

mailing list discussion
aligning with 1527750

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>perfective form</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Japanese_language#Conjugation_table

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1187890">仮定形・かていけい</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>realis form (e.g. has happened)</gloss>
+<gloss>realis form (of verbs and adjectives in classical Japanese)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>exclusive possession or rights</gloss>
+<gloss>exclusive possession</gloss>
+<gloss>sole ownership</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

Added sense.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>writing</gloss>
+<gloss>(piece of) writing</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(act of) writing</gloss>
+</sense>

2,170,000 書き物
  259,000 書きもの

Add mazegaki spelling 書きもの (as per 書きもの机)

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>書きもの</keb>

daij

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>hoop (e.g. of a barrel)</gloss>
+<gloss>hoop (of a barrel, bucket, etc.)</gloss>

Noted as an 異体字.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笟</keb>

daijs

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>𥶡</keb>

Agreed.

I'm inclined to agree. 86 googits; mostly from here. Not like the masses for 仕様が無い.

just a sentence, not a variation of 仕様が無い even.

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

google

We have 映画会社, 映画学校, 映画界, 映画研究, 映画祭 etc. etc.
We also have 文学賞
No harm in adding this on too

A+B and the meaning is obvious. Not sure we need it.

82,200,000 hits in bing

daij
gg5 (箍)

Used in all sorts of ways.

daij
gg5 (箍)