OK

If nikk is using just the modern spelling, I think we can too. I don't see any benefit to having both.

Most of the kokugos have "Inglez" as the source (Nikk is an exception.) I feel having both is best.

Not sure what the merit is of having the old spelling of this word. The pronunciation hasn't changed. It's a bit jarring, as a Portuguese speaker. Also, it's not a proper noun in Portuguese, so no need for a capital letter at the beginning.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="por">Inglez, Inglês</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="por">inglês</lsource>

daij, meikyo, gg5

Splitting sense 2.

@@ -20,2 +20,8 @@
-<gloss>watch (turn to watch or guard something)</gloss>
-<gloss>watching</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>watching (a trend, developments, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>observing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(one's) watch (on a ship)</gloss>
+<gloss>watchkeeping</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +33 @@
+<s_inf>esp. ワッチ</s_inf>

Daijr (has ワッチ for sense 2, but WWW images show senses 1 & 3 apply too.)  G n-grams:
ウォッチ	965745
ウオッチ	284538
ワッチ	51158

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワッチ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +21,7 @@
+<gloss>watching</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2830119">ワッチキャップ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>watch cap</gloss>

Agree

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>power</gloss>

I don't think we should include "power" in that sense if we're tagging it as a physics term. They're different concepts. GG5 and prog only have "energy".
Adding "エネルギー資源" sense (daijs and koj).

@@ -29,0 +30,7 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1962130">エネルギー資源</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>energy source</gloss>
+<gloss>energy resource</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>power</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>energy</gloss>

X-ref not necessary in this direction.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1029350">エナジー</xref>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&cards;</field>

Easiest to move it.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

オールマイティー	77735
オールマイティ	149474
can we move the gai1? or do we have to put spec1 on the first one?

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<reb>オールマイティ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>オールマイティ</reb>

daij 
daijr places "wild card" first

http://gameperson.cocolog-nifty.com/tgh_mobile/2009/08/45-9a98.html
"シリーズ・日常用語になったゲーム用語 その４) ワイルドカード・オールマイティ(4/5)
オールマイティの方が有名用語
日本でのゲーム用語では、ワイルドカードという熟語より、「オールマイティ[almighty]」という単語の方がよく使われます。"

wild card "a playing card that can have any value, suit, colour, or other property in a game at the discretion of the player holding it."
I've heard this word used like this many times (rather than "ace of spades") in normal playing card games and board games etc. as well

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>highest valued card (e.g. ace of spades)</gloss>
+<gloss>wild card</gloss>

G n-grams:
キャスケード	8409
カスケード	94189

I see a lot of this カス <-> キャス pairing. A few people even write カンベラ instead of キャンベラ.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャスケード</reb>

Oops

G n-grams:
キャンディ  	908148
キャンディー	473666
キャンデー 	 53874

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<reb>キャンディー</reb>
+<reb>キャンディ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8 +9,2 @@
-<reb>キャンディ</reb>
+<reb>キャンディー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Daijr, GG5, etc. G n-grams:
キャンディ	908148
キャンデー	53874
キャンディー	473666

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャンデー</reb>
+</r_ele>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1114719151  (commenting that it's not correct)
G n-grams:
グッツ	221096
グッズ	17391329

Too many uses to ignore, but needs tagging that it's incorrect.

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>グッツ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Daijr, WWW images, G n-grams:
スポーティー	199396
スポーティ	294916

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スポーティ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,2 +14 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>sporty</gloss>
+<gloss>sporty (esp. garments, accessories, etc.)</gloss>

G n-grams:
チェアー	184197
チェア	1664120
医学英和辞典: チェアータイム
リーダーズ+プラス: チェアーテーブル
WWW images for チェアー shows lots of chairs....

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チェアー</reb>
+</r_ele>

GG5, G n-grams:
テイラー	181838
テーラー	231509

The count for テイラー has a lot of Taylor, etc. transliterations.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テイラー</reb>
+</r_ele>

G n-grams:
デイジー	275564
デージー	43666

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デイジー</reb>
+</r_ele>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/ディティール  G n-grams:
ディティール	157185
ディテール	567911
デテール	2738
ディーテイル	1963

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ディティール</reb>

Ngrams, Daijr, GG5

Merging 1083390.

@@ -8,0 +8,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デテール</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ディーテイル</reb>
+</r_ele>

G n-grams:
トレールバイク	1702
トレイルバイク	317

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>トレイルバイク</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トレイル・バイク</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トレール・バイク</reb>

Possibly because I removed some senses from 隧道.

Not sure why the xrefs disappeared

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・すいどう</xref>

reopen

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・1</xref>
@@ -17 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・2</xref>
@@ -26 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・3</xref>

tmp

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・2</xref>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1574050">隧道・3</xref>

JLD, JWN, G n-grams:
ヴァケイション	136073
バケーション	197006
ヴァケーション	4590
バケイション	1440

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァケイション</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァケーション</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バケイション</reb>

Wiki: "誤って「バトミントン」と呼ばれることが..."  G n-grams:
バトミントン	117675
バドミントン	619245

If it's an error it's rather common.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バトミントン</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

G n-grams:
パーテーション	125088
パーティション	431631
WWW images confirm meaning.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パーテーション</reb>

I don't think we'd class team names as "baseball terminology".

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<field>&baseb;</field>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1101420">パシフィックリーグ</xref>
+<field>&baseb;</field>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Pacific League</gloss>
+<gloss>Pacific League (Japanese baseball league)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1193610">火・ひ</xref>

G n-grams:
ファイアー	177220
ファイア	408365
ファイヤー	103406
ファイヤ	10360

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ファイアー</reb>

フィギュア	4,850,742	95.6%	
フィギア	        222,593	        4.4%

フィギア isn't in my refs.
We don't use [sport] for names of sports.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

G n-grams: 
ブルドック	166463
ブルドッグ	324572
医学英和辞典 has "ブルドック鉗子　bulldog forceps"
WWW images confirm.

Ridiculously high count.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブルドック</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

メントール	101085
メンソール	58862

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1134350">メントール・1</xref>

gg5, daijr

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Menthol</lsource>

I've removed the linking to that sentence (will take a week or two to take effect.)

Actually, the gg5 entry refers to Mentor, a friend of Odyssey, in Greek mythology
The normal word for "mentor" is メンター

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>mentor</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mentor</gloss>
+</sense>

Should be edited/corrected OR deleted, because:
1) Entry definition and example do not match. 
2) If giving the German pronunciation of menthol, then the example entry should be deleted, since it refers to "mentor" and (as a German speaker) menthol usually means menthol the flavor (in candy, cigarettes, etc.)

G n-grams:
レコーダー	1215102
レコーダ	182727
リコーダー	240383
リコーダ	8126
Daijr, GG5, etc.

Restriction was wrong

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<reb>レコーダ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17 +20 @@
-<stagr>リコーダ</stagr>
+<stagr>レコーダ</stagr>

G n-grams:
レイク	220255
レーク	67267

The n-grams count is skewed by レイク being the name of a bank loan product, but you can see it used in things like レイクサイド and ソルトレイクシティ.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レイク</reb>
+</r_ele>

gg5

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>foreign consumption</gloss>
+<gloss>foreign demand</gloss>

Moved gloss to correct sense.

@@ -19,3 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>to hold (a meeting)</gloss>
-<gloss>to give (a dinner)</gloss>
-<gloss>to show signs of</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold (an event)</gloss>
+<gloss>to give (a dinner, party, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to show signs of</gloss>

Good to know that "call of nature" is distinct from sensation.

daijr

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to feel (sensation, emotion, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel (sensation, emotion, call of nature, etc.)</gloss>

I think this is part of sense 2. I'll add an extra gloss.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>to act towards</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=接する

I think this often also means "to treat" or "to act towards" (e.g. 優しく接する) or "to keep company with"

≒ 付き合う

@@ -53 +53 @@
-<field>&geom;</field>
+<field>&math;</field>

@@ -53 +53 @@
-<field>&math;</field>
+<field>&geom;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 走る　 │  7,347,020 │ 98.2% │
│ 奔る　 │     22,263 │  0.3% │
│ 疾る　 │      8,592 │  0.1% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo 2e: 近年速く走る意（「疾走」をふまえる）)
│ 趨る　 │        281 │  0.0% │
│ はしる │    105,697 │  1.4% │
├─ーーー─┼────────────┼───────┤
│ 走っ　 │ 10,069,765 │ 97.7% │
│ 奔っ　 │      3,089 │  0.0% │
│ 疾っ　 │      1,351 │  0.0% │
│ 趨っ　 │         39 │  0.0% │
│ はしっ │    228,587 │  2.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>疾る</keb>

走る	7347020
奔る	22263
趨る	281
まで走って	145623
まで奔って	20
まで趨って	No matches

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I should've noticed that.
Reindexed sentences.

lightening, n.:
the sensation, experienced by many women late in pregnancy when the head of the fetus enters the pelvis, of a reduction in pressure on the diaphragm, making it easier to breathe

@@ -61 +61 @@
-<gloss>to flash (of lightening)</gloss>
+<gloss>to flash (of lightning)</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom

All the JEs lead with "probably".

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>probably</gloss>
+<gloss>likely</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>probably</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24 +26,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>a lot of</gloss>
+<gloss>much</gloss>
+<gloss>many</gloss>
+<gloss>considerable</gloss>
+<gloss>large (amount)</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +31,0 @@
-<gloss>many</gloss>
-<gloss>much</gloss>
-<gloss>great</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>maybe</gloss>

Can probably close this now.

ngrams 1408488

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I retagged it yesterday (to テレビ中継). The tagging changes only become available once a week (some time tomorrow.)

I think the sentence still needs to be moved.

daij, gg5, prog

Added senses.
Split sense one.
The baseball sense is an abbreviation
The sentence for this entry is incorrectly tagged. It belongs with 1424040 (中継 [ちゅうけい]).

@@ -31,6 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>intermediation</gloss>
-<gloss>relaying</gloss>
-<gloss>intermediary</gloss>
-<gloss>relay</gloss>
-<gloss>agency</gloss>
-<gloss>brokerage</gloss>
@@ -40,0 +35,13 @@
+<gloss>intermediation</gloss>
+<gloss>acting as an intermediary</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>relaying</gloss>
+<gloss>taking over</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2836587">中継ぎ投手</xref>
@@ -42 +49,2 @@
-<gloss>mid-relief pitcher</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>middle relief pitcher</gloss>
@@ -44,0 +53,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pole-shaped item with a join in the middle</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tea container with a lid that is the same size as the body</gloss>
+</sense>

Gg5

Yes, it's very broad.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to put against</gloss>
+<gloss>to connect</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>to put against</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/つける/#je-50148

it's clear that 窓に頭をつける does not in fact mean "to attach head [permanently] to a window" but that's how the entry currently reads

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to put against</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -85,3 +85,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1856870">跡をつける・1</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to follow</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to follow (someone)</gloss>
@@ -88,0 +88,2 @@
+<gloss>to tail</gloss>
+<gloss>to stalk</gloss>

daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -114,8 +114,7 @@
-<gloss>to turn on (light)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>of a plant</s_inf>
-<gloss>to produce flowers</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn on (a light)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to produce flowers (of a plant)</gloss>
@@ -125,5 +124,5 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445730">怒鳴りつける・どなりつける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445730">怒鳴りつける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
@@ -130,0 +130,10 @@
+<gloss>to do fiercely</gloss>
+<gloss>to do strongly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be used to (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be accustomed to</gloss>

👍

Thanks for the explanation. I don't have any objections to using
the field tags to mean specific terminology or jargon rather than
categorization, but until now I had no idea that was the
intent. (I finally understand why タンク isn't [mil]).

We typically only use field tags for terminology (i.e. technical or special terms). So 積分 gets a math tag but 数学者 does not. It has been suggested in the past that we expand the use of field tags to include all field-related terms but I'm not sure there's much enthusiasm for that idea. I'm quite happy with the current policy, which mirrors that of the JEs and English dictionaries.
Deciding what counts as "terminology" isn't an exact science, but simple A+B terms like 麻雀クラブ or 麻雀打ち wouldn't usually be tagged.

I thought the purpose of field tags was at least partially to
serve as metadata. For example, you can search "#mahj" on
jisho.org to bring up a list of all mahjong vocabulary.

If we're going to remove tags because they look redundant, should
we also remove the tag from 麻雀牌 ("mahjong tile"), 雀荘 ("mahjong
parlour; mahjong parlor"), 雀卓 ("mahjong table"), etc?

We're actually kind of inconsistent about this right now. In
addition to 麻雀, similar entries like 麻雀打ち and 麻雀クラブ
also don't have the tag.

Absolutely. The field tags should be dropped from 花札 and 相撲.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<field>&mahj;</field>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>short</gloss>

daijr

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>游撃</keb>

daijr, koj, nikk

ついどう is in the kokugos.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1087630">トンネル・1</xref>

Not sure why the xrefs disappeared

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1087630">トンネル・1</xref>

I agree.

@@ -21,10 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<field>&physics;</field>
-<gloss>to tunnel (through a potential barrier)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&baseb;</field>
-<gloss>fielding error</gloss>
-</sense>

Sorry, I misread the gg5 entry.
I think both sense 2 and sense 3 should be removed,
along with xrefs.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1457730">内・うち・4</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1457730">内・うち・6</xref>

gg5, daij

Adding glosses from rejected 2842786.

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>those people</gloss>
+<gloss>someone else</gloss>
+<gloss>other people</gloss>
@@ -38,2 +40,6 @@
-<s_inf>often as 〜をよそに, 〜をよそにして, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>unrelated matter</gloss>
+<s_inf>as 〜をよそに, 〜をよそにして, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>not caring for</gloss>
+<gloss>being indifferent to</gloss>
+<gloss>taking little notice of</gloss>
+<gloss>ignoring</gloss>
+<gloss>neglecting</gloss>

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2118520">よそにする</xref>
@@ -37 +38 @@
-<s_inf>often as 〜をよそに,〜をよそにして, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often as 〜をよそに, 〜をよそにして, etc.</s_inf>

I agree that if the figurative sense is much more common, then it should come first.

I think it really comes down to frequency of use for senses. We've followed the usual approach in modern dictionaries of having the senses in frequency order. We have the [lit] tag to highlight cases where they differ significantly.
In this case I don't think it's an issue, but when there's a common figurative sense and a rare literal sense, I'd really think it's most appropriate for the common one to lead.

Concerning the ordering of the senses,
I think the literal sense should come before the figurative sense,
even if the latter is more common

はるのど。

None. Zero n-grams.

42 Google hits; almost all from here. Rather A+B. I don't think it's needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>to delete a letter</gloss>
+<gloss>to delete a character</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手にとる</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to obtain</gloss>

ok

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Central League</gloss>
+<gloss>Central League (Japanese baseball league)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>セ・リーグ</reb>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1987020">セントラルリーグ</xref>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1200750">改める・あらためる・1</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1200750">改める・あらためる・3</xref>
+<gloss>examination</gloss>
+<gloss>inspection</gloss>
+<gloss>investigation</gloss>
+</sense>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/改め

This word has an additional meaning as a rough synonym of 取り調
べ that is not listed.

Entry created

Style alignment.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>dachshund</gloss>
+<gloss>dachshund (dog breed)</gloss>

I didn't think we did, but I'm easy with it.

i could be wrong, but i think we generally give the german even when the only difference is the cap

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Dachshund</lsource>

G n-grams:
ダックスフンド	115621
ダックスフント	137141
Wikij (says ダックスフンド is based on the English pronunciation.)

I'm surprised ダックスフンド is so common.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダックスフンド</reb>

G n-grams:
キユーピー	137641
キューピー	721101

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キユーピー</reb>

Entry created

フィギュアスケート	494,428	92.7%	
フィギアスケート	38,891	7.3%

We don't use [sport] for names of sports.
フィギアスケート isn't in my refs. Nor is フィギア.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -18 +19,0 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>

not obvious

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

Agreed.
Do we want to mark entries like this one as wasei? I think 
some similar entries are, others aren't.

G n-grams:
テイスティング	132068
ティスティング	12770
テースティング	8607

That dotted version was a bungle.

@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<reb>テイ・スティング</reb>
+<reb>ティスティング</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テースティング</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テイ・スティング</reb>

Entry created

daij, gg5, prog
G n-grams:
強面	77187
強面の	31186
強面な	6393

I think this is clearer with two senses.

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -30,3 +31,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>hard-faced</gloss>
-<gloss>aggressive</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +34,9 @@
+<gloss>tough look</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>aggressive attitude</gloss>
+<gloss>coercive attitude</gloss>
+<gloss>taking a hard line</gloss>

G n-grams:
こわおもて	1590
コワオモテ	1309
Daijr and Halpern's JLD both have こわおもて.

Yes, not really "uk".
I think we can safely add the こわおもて/コワオモテ version further down the list.

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<reb>こわおもて</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22,4 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コワオモテ</reb>
@@ -23 +30,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijs
ngrams

強面	77187
怖面	882
恐面	891
コワモテ	30879
こわもて	21391

Maybe not actually uk?

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コワモテ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I don't think we use CE for years after 999.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261 CE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

dunno.  probably a question for the mailing list rather than a random entry though.
--
for the record, wiki policy, which we sometimes follow, says:
"In general, do not use CE or AD unless required to avoid ambiguity (e.g. The Norman Conquest took place in 1066 not 1066 CE nor AD 1066) or awkwardness (January 1, 1 AD not January 1, 1). On the other hand, Plotinus was a philosopher living at the end of the 3rd century AD will avoid unnecessary confusion. Also, in He did not become king until 55 CE the era marker makes it clear that "55" does not refer to his age. Alternatively, He did not become king until the year 55. If the era is shown for the initial date in a range, then use it for the final date as well: either from 450 to 200 BCE or from 450 BCE to 200 BCE, but definitely from 100 BCE to 200 CE. (See § Ranges, below.)"

Surely not with dates from the 20th and 21st centuries?
Where do we draw the line? Before 1800?

Merged with 2312230.

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デージー・チェーン</reb>

Entry created

Merging with 2312240.

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デージーホイール・プリンタ</reb>

Entry created

Daijr, GG5, etc. G n-grams:
デージーチェーン	784
デイジーチェーン	6709

Merging 2312230.

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デージーチェーン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デイジー・チェーン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デージー・チェーン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>daisy chain</gloss>

Entry created

(eij)

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>デイジーホイールプリンター</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デイジー・ホイール・プリンター</reb>

No n-gram scores.

Merging 2309470. Very marginal, but I don't want to rempve it entirely.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>デージーホイールプリンタ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デージーホイール・プリンタ</reb>
@@ -13,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>daisy-wheel printer</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (xrefs トレイル to トレール) G n-grams:
トレイル	276445
トレール	38570

As usual the writers of WWW pages far prefer イ to ー for vowel-lengthening.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トレイル</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

OK

ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Probably better to make it part of the gloss.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<s_inf>from architectural ecology</s_inf>
-<gloss>arcology</gloss>
+<gloss>arcology (from architectural ecology)</gloss>

The comment explains the origin of the English gloss, not the Japanese word.
Is that OK?

リーダーズ+プラス  N-grams: 906

This should make it clearer.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>earthing</gloss>
+<gloss>earthing (circuits)</gloss>
+<gloss>grounding</gloss>

"earthing" seems to used mostly for some flaky New Age theories
Maybe "grounding" would be better?

N-grams: 114375!
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アーシング

Seems to be mostly used in automotive contexts.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙  G n-grams:
アクチベーター	1013
アクティベーター	4350
アクチベータ	708
アクティベータ	5223

レジ is Japanese abbr. we're not consistent when it comes to treating words likr this as wasei or not

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y"/>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">self regi(ster)</lsource>

Daijr, GG5, G n-grams:
セルフレジ	13912
無人レジ	1296
セルフチェックアウト	416

Daijr, G n-grams: 416

ハーレクィン	952
ハーレクイン	1036705
ハーレキン	133 (daijs: ハーレキンとも）

Let's merge it in here instead.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハーレクィン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハーレキン</reb>

suggestinv merge w ハーレクィン

リーダーズ+プラス  G n-grams:
ハーレクイン	1036705
アルレッキーノ	3614
アルルカン	9997

アルレッキーノ and アルルカン are from Italian and French. We have entries for them already.

Daijr,  ＫＯＤ追加語彙 G n-grams:
アフィリエイター	675187
アフィリエーター 23702

Odd one. I can't find it really being used in English.

I don't think the expl gloss is needed.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&vidg;</field>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">short and simple video game</gloss>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>practice game, usu. with reduced players</gloss>
+<gloss>practice game (usu. with reduced players)</gloss>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, G n-grams: 500k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minigame

ＫＯＤ追加語彙  http://trailrunner.jp/  G n-grams: 
トレイルランナー	6896
トレールランナー	<20 (plenty of WWW hits)

ルミナス, G n-grams:
バルサミコ	195436
バルサミコ酢	98499

リーダーズ+プラス  G n-grams:
チェアーテーブル	530
チェアテーブル	892
チェアー・テーブル	119
チェア・テーブル	1632
WWW images.

G n-grams:
テーブルチェア	14647
テーブルチェアー	4656
テーブル・チェア	8571
テーブル・チェアー	898
WWW images galore.

Ignored by dictionaries.

リーダーズ+プラス

http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=皮肉にも

皮肉にも 【ひにくにも】 (adv) ironically; as irony would have it; in a nice little twist; ironically enough; WI1

Daijr, GG5, etc. Wikij: "ディーヴァまたはディーバ". N-grams:
ディーヴァ	132532
ディーバ	55545

Th count for ディーヴァ is inflated by proper nouns, etc.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, G n-grams:
ワッチキャップ	4797
ウォッチキャップ	309
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/watch_cap

Daijr, LSD. N-grams: 8454

Mainly seen in things like オーファンドラッグ.