no ref appears to be forthcoming.  only 22 ngrams as noted above, and the meaning is rather obvious

と比べれば可愛いもんだ	22

Really need a reference for that additional sense.

@@ -59,0 +60,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>used ironically when comparing things, esp. as ～と比べれば可愛いもんだ</s_inf>
+<gloss>nothing to get upset over</gloss>
+<gloss>harmless</gloss>
+</sense>

Happy to drop it.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Do we really want to tag かわゆい as outdated? I've seen it and I think also heard it used plenty of times. Daij both use an 
example from a book from 1907/Meiji 40 (which means we wouldn't tag it as arch if it were a separate sense).

JEs, Kokugos

Best without "cute" there as it's in sense 1.
I thought maybe 4 senses were too many; GG5 has 3 and 中辞典 has 2, but I see the kokugos have quite a lot.
I'll look into the indexing of the sentences.

@@ -57 +56,0 @@
-<gloss>cute</gloss>

I'm not sure "cute little" rather than "cute; little" was a mistake? I don't think "cute" by itself means "dainty; little; tiny" in 
English...?

added a semi-colon after cute

+dainty; cute; little; tiny
-dainty; cute little; tiny

@@ -57 +57,2 @@
-<gloss>cute little</gloss>
+<gloss>cute</gloss>
+<gloss>little</gloss>

Happy to drop it.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -12 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>this duty or job</gloss>
+<gloss>this duty</gloss>
+<gloss>this task</gloss>
+<gloss>this job</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<gloss>I (as the person in charge of this task)</gloss>

G n-grams:
ど真ん中	731951
ド真ん中	 72536
ど真中	 15829
ド真中	  9114
どまん中	 15396
ドまん中	   567
土真ん中	    45

adding どまん中 and ドまん中

@@ -16,0 +17,6 @@
+<keb>どまん中</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ドまん中</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +30 @@
+<re_restr>どまん中</re_restr>
@@ -29,0 +37 @@
+<re_restr>ドまん中</re_restr>

G n-grams:
ど真ん中	731951
ど真中	15829
ド真ん中	72536
ド真中	9114
土真ん中	45
どまんなか	45302
ドまんなか	395

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ど真中</keb>
+<keb>ド真ん中</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>ド真ん中</keb>
+<keb>ど真中</keb>
@@ -21,0 +22,8 @@
+<re_restr>ど真ん中</re_restr>
+<re_restr>ど真中</re_restr>
+<re_restr>土真ん中</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドまんなか</reb>
+<re_restr>ド真ん中</re_restr>
+<re_restr>ド真中</re_restr>

Can't find it in dictionaries, but the ど really is often written in katakana.

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ド真ん中</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ド真中</keb>

ウザイ  554300

I overlooked this one.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウザイ</reb>
+</r_ele>

G n-grams:
ウザい	199540
うざい	362127
うざったい	40247
ウザったい	8589
ウザッたい	1174
ウザッタイ	2022

I think ウザい, etc. are more likely to be used for sense 1.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ウザい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウザったい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウザッタイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウザッたい</reb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826345">うぜえ・1</xref>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826345">うぜえ・2</xref>

gg5:
うざったい
 be a nuisance; 《口》 be a pain in the neck. [⇒うざい]
うざい
 be irritating [bothersome]; be in the way; be a big nuisance; 《口》 be a big pain in the neck.
=====
eij:
うざい
→ うざったい、うっとうしい、煩わしい、面倒くさい、邪魔な、いら立つ、イライラする

ngrams

not vernacular language

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>vernaculer</gloss>
+<gloss>vernacular (e.g. architecture)</gloss>

G n-grams:
バナキュラー	903
ヴァナキュラー	1680

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァナキュラー</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 N-grams: 57k

gg5 E-DIC

wiki

Koj, Daijr, GG5, ルミナス, Eijiro

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Kenchiku glossary

I don't think the x-ref is helpful.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>

GG5: a work of the highest quality; a masterpiece; a masterwork; one's magnum opus.

Having a solitary plural gloss sitting in the middle of singular ones looks very odd, Anyway, I doubt it's actually needed; the other five are quite sufficient.
Also, we are fairly wary of quoting verbatim from Eijiro - see the Editorial Policy.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

I do see that we don't usually do (s).  This situation seems exceptional to me, I just don't know how to address it.

Suggestion #2: just make "greatest works" plural (also a deviation from our style, but it is sometimes done in mostly-plural cases).  Eijiro even does this:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
crowning work
greatest works
magnum opus

The issue here remains that "highest", "crowning", "greatest", "magnum opus" all strongly imply that this is singular. (and masterpiece and masterwork, while not strictly defined as singular, are quite compatible with this interpretation). 　最高 also seems like it could be "the absolute best". 

That makes the whole entry misleading. If you were seeing this in a J->E context, you could easily be lead to believe "there must be only one thing", when 最高傑作 does not have this limitation, and is quite often plural/uncountable.

I assumed it was the #1 best thing, until I went searching for examples and discovered it was not.  That's what I wanted to address for other dictionary users.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>greatest work</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

We don't usually do "(s)" endings.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work</gloss>

One of...
傑作の一つ	14858
最高傑作の一つ	6851

https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/傑作
最高傑作は
-masterpiece
the perfect album
the best works
finest work

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
greatest works
(among others)

Google returns some nice examples when simply searching
最高傑作 "greatest masterpieces"

I would personally do this:
(greatest) masterpiece(s)
But I feel like this will be too ugly to be accepted.

xref in an attempt to make it clear that you might be saying more than you mean to with "最高傑作". "傑作" is already legitimately "a masterpiece".  This entry is "among their greatest masterpieces", or something like that.

The selection of glosses here, along with 最高, give the strong impression that only one work applies.  But ngrams for "最高傑作の一つ" give away that this is not necessarily the case.  

In the structure "one of their "..., none if the existing glosses seemed to me to apply.  "One of their finest works" seems most natural to me, "one of their best/greatest works", one of their greatest masterpieces... 

"best" (or "greatest") seems more appropriate here than it did in "傑作"  If you search "傑作" and "best work", the results will tend toward "最高傑作". 

masterwork can legitimately go with 傑作 alone. That said, "masterpiece" seems like the most common gloss for 傑作 or for  最高傑作, so I've moved it up.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>

daijs

Daijr, リーダーズ+プラス, Wikij (シャーローム) N-grams:
シャローム	19977
シャーローム	313

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/インクルージョン教育  (インクルーシブ教育とも。)

A semi-wasei. インクルーシブ教育 seems to be a bit more common.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2829839">インクルーシブ教育</xref>

daijs
ngrams = 1457

インクルーシブ教育	2473
インクルージョン教育	1457

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Wikij page for インクルージョン教育.

This seems to be a bit more common than インクルージョン教育 - the ngrams site is offline so I can't check there.