亜爾加里	No matches
アルカリ	781951

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>亜爾加里</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Daijr (says it's from Dutch, but mentions the Arabic origin)

All the European versions came from Arabic, but I think here it's best just to stick with just the "upstream" source. Otherwise we'd be putting Latin/Greek/Proto-Indo-European/etc. on every second 外来語.

jwiki(アルカリ) and daijs say it's from Arabic

Maybe from Arabic via Dutch

Sentences fixed.

gg5, prog, daij, nikk

I'm seeing 4 senses.
The sentences are actually sense 2.

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<gloss>delicate</gloss>
-<gloss>sensitive</gloss>
-<gloss>subtle</gloss>
+<gloss>sensitive (person, heart, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>delicate</gloss>
-<gloss>requiring care</gloss>
+<gloss>delicate (issue, problem, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>sensitive</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>fragile</gloss>
@@ -25 +24,6 @@
-<gloss>fragile</gloss>
+<gloss>sensitive (e.g. skin)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>delicate (fabric, shade, flavour, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>subtle</gloss>

Several other references make this 3-way split. I see both example sentences are sense 1.

大辞泉

@@ -15,0 +16,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>delicate</gloss>
+<gloss>requiring care</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>delicate</gloss>
+<gloss>fragile</gloss>

daij

Not a noun.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

smk: 「｛刷子｝・｛髤筆｝」とも書く。

https://kotobank.jp/word/髤筆-1300494
>> 《和名抄》では髤筆と書いて〈はけ〉と読ませ，漆を塗るものと定義している。

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>髤筆</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

But not just painting. See comments below.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>brush (for painting)</gloss>
+<gloss>brush (for painting, basting, etc.)</gloss>

刷毛	186885
刷子	4422
roughly 2%. and also read sasshi

not a brush for brushing hair or fur etc.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>brush</gloss>
+<gloss>brush (for painting)</gloss>

Adding 刷子 from 1579310.
I'm not seeing any whisks in the search results, only pastry/basting brushes.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>刷子</keb>
@@ -16,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>brush (e.g. for painting, basting, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>whisk</gloss>
+<gloss>brush</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Daijs, Nikk

I can live with it.

A+B

G n-grams:
刷毛目	41439
はけ目	2397
はけめ	1758

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はけ目</keb>

GG5, etc. G n-grams:
ライブラリアン	23720
図書館員	97604
司書	375227

The JEs often lead with "library clerk". I think 図書館員 is general for people who work in libraries, whereas 司書 is more a trained/qualified librarian.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1306670">司書</xref>
+<gloss>library clerk</gloss>

gg5, eij, koj, wiki, daij

no evidence of the original gloss in any of my sources

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>test condition (programming, programing)</gloss>
-<gloss>conditional expression</gloss>
-<gloss>test expression</gloss>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>discriminant</gloss>

Daijirin, Daijisen, Koj, GG5, 中辞典, etc.

None of the references do a sense split, and indeed it all looks like the same thing to me.

@@ -17,6 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>one's permanent residence as recorded in the family register</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>one's registered domicile</gloss>
-<gloss>one's legal domicile</gloss>
+<gloss>one's registered domicile (as recorded in the family register)</gloss>
+<gloss>one's legal domicile (as opposed to where one lives)</gloss>

The [S]anseido dictionary option linked from wwwjdic includes "one's registered 
domicile; one's legal domicile"  http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/je/71016/meaning/m1u/本
籍/
The Wisdom dictionary includes "one's permanent [legal] residence". 
Note that the koseki system is different from the jūminhyō residency registration, 
which holds current address information.  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koseki#Koseki_and_citizenship

The meaning is problematic if the person lives at a different address.  A person's 
honseki might be an address that has ceased to exist. The person might have 
never been there. In the register I am looking at, the address was the residence of 
some head of the family at some past point in time, it is not the office where the 
register is kept. If I understand correctly, the term has no meaning outside the 
context of a family register so there is no corresponding english word. I have no 
legal knowledge about this, just looking at a register and talking to the subject 
person, trying to understand the difference between 住所 and 本籍.

@@ -16 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>one's permanent residence</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1267030">戸籍・こせき・1</xref>
+<gloss>one's permanent residence as recorded in the family register</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one's registered domicile</gloss>
+<gloss>one's legal domicile</gloss>

G n-grams:
鯰髭	97
ナマズ髭	222
なまず髭	116
なまずひげ	218

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ナマズ髭</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なまず髭</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +14,4 @@
+<reb>ナマズひげ</reb>
+<re_restr>ナマズ髭</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>なまず髭</re_restr>
+<re_restr>鯰髭</re_restr>

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. あかいろ</s_inf>

We don't usually split out adj-na,adj-no, especially not for colors. also "usu. せきしょく" is not correct.
I don't think adj-na is correct either (not in kokugos)

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24,7 +24,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<s_inf>usu. せきしょく</s_inf>
-<gloss>red-colored</gloss>
-<gloss>red</gloss>

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>red, red color (colour)</gloss>
+<gloss>red</gloss>
+<gloss>red color (colour)</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典, etc.

I have no idea which reading is more common. GG5 and my other JEs only have せきしょく.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -17,0 +20,6 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. あかいろ</s_inf>
+<gloss>red, red color (colour)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +27,6 @@
+<s_inf>usu. せきしょく</s_inf>
+<gloss>red-colored</gloss>
+<gloss>red</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>せきしょく</stagr>
@@ -21 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>red</gloss>
+<gloss>communism</gloss>
+<gloss>the left</gloss>

I don't think おさい is uk. Also, it's defined as 「菜」の丁寧語. I'll split it out into a separate entry.

@@ -26,4 +25,0 @@
-<reb>おさい</reb>
-<re_restr>お菜</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -41 +36,0 @@
-<stagr>おかず</stagr>
@@ -50 +44,0 @@
-<stagr>おかず</stagr>

Removing the オカズ restriction from the second sense

@@ -42 +41,0 @@
-<stagr>オカズ</stagr>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<keb>御菜</keb>
+<keb>お数</keb>
@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<keb>御数</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>御菜</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<keb>お数</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>御数</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>御菜</re_restr>
@@ -32 +31 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -53 +51,0 @@
-<stagr>オカズ</stagr>
@@ -57,0 +56 @@
+<s_inf>oft. as オカズ</s_inf>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| お菜　　　　 |    13,368 |  0.4% | <- in meikyo
| 御菜　　　　 |     1,484 |  0.0% | <- in daijr/s
| 御数　　　　 |       954 |  0.0% | <- in daijr/s, koj, nikk
| お数　　　　 |       608 |  0.0% | <- in meikyo
| おかず　　　 | 3,506,153 | 96.0% |
| おさい　　　 |    86,045 |  N/A  |
| オカズ　　　 |   128,206 |  3.5% |
|-ーーーーーー-+-----------+-------|
| 夕食のお菜　 |        22 |  0.1% |
| 夕食の御菜　 |         0 |  0.0% |
| 夕食の御数　 |         0 |  0.0% |
| 夕食のお数　 |         0 |  0.0% |
| 夕食のおかず |    19,567 | 96.4% |
| 夕食のおさい |         0 |  0.0% |
| 夕食のオカズ |       702 |  3.5% |

[spec1] on おかず ?
I don't think the counts are inflated; おかず doesn't seem to be used as a name.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Kagaku & Kenchiku glossaries. G n-grams:
蛍光	1421923
けいこう	37847
螢光	9985
けい光	4648

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>けい光</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/着床

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>implantation</gloss>
+<gloss>implantation (of an embryo)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1707820">取り舵・とりかじ</xref>

Wasn't sure it was really an antonym, but it seems it is.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1643650">面舵</xref>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_Japanese_words_of_Dutch_origin

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="dut">patroon</lsource>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Most refs include tallow or 牛脂 in the one gloss, although tallow is a slightly different thing.

@@ -11 +11,7 @@
-<gloss>beef dripping (fat)</gloss>
+<gloss>beef fat</gloss>
+<gloss>beef dripping</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1231500">牛脂</xref>
+<gloss>beef tallow</gloss>

Entry created

Best if I just reject the whole update.. I agree the 中ぽち is rather unlikely.

ぽち readings don't seem to be valid - removed.

@@ -29,10 +28,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なかぽち</reb>
-<re_restr>・</re_restr>
-<re_restr>中ぽち</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なかポチ</reb>
-<re_restr>・</re_restr>
-<re_restr>中ポチ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>

Readings merged from 2529250

@@ -12,0 +13,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>中ぽち</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>中ポチ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -22,0 +29,10 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なかぽち</reb>
+<re_restr>・</re_restr>
+<re_restr>中ぽち</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なかポチ</reb>
+<re_restr>・</re_restr>
+<re_restr>中ポチ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

I can't find support for this entry.

Dup of 2529240 with different reading.

Entry created

I have to remove this "fork" as Rene has made parallel (and similar) edits.

https://kotobank.jp/word/ず-539402#E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.9E.97.20.E7.AC.AC.E4.B8.89.E7.89.88

So it appears that ず is the 連用形 of the auxiliary verb ぬ which already has an entry in JMdict. There must be an error in unidic-mecab because it claims that ず is the lemma of ず and ぬ.

I have the understanding that conjunctive forms should not be in the dictionary (example: する, し) so I removed the edit.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ず</reb>

ず is sometimes seen without に but there's no entry for ず that 
says it means "not".

Considerations:
The meaning may differ a bit from ずに in some cases. Should 
there be a new entry or a new gloss for this entry? Or maybe 
the new gloss should be added to ズ；ず (English loan word 
meaning the pluralizing and possessive suffix) instead?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ず</reb>

Don't assume users know about 未然形.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the 未然形</s_inf>
+<s_inf>attaches to the imperfective form</s_inf>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<s_inf>attaches to the 未然形</s_inf>

Good approach.

generally we call it the nai stem (e.g. 2441300)

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the imperfective form</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>

ず should be an entry, but it can't go here because of PoS difference

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ず</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

ず is sometimes seen without に but there's no entry for ず that 
says it means "not".

Considerations:
The meaning may differ a bit from ずに in some cases. Should 
there be a new entry or a new gloss for this entry? Or maybe 
the new gloss should be added to ズ；ず (English loan word 
meaning the pluralizing and possessive suffix) instead?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ず</reb>

Don't assume users know about 未然形.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the 未然形</s_inf>
+<s_inf>attaches to the imperfective form</s_inf>

Unidic xrefs キモヲタ, etc, to キモオタ. Google n-grams:
キモオタ	57411
きもおた	635
キモヲタ	79293
きもをた	275

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>キモヲタ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きもおた</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きもをた</reb>
@@ -10 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1034420">オタク</xref>

http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/キモオタ

@@ -9,1 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2686310">キモいオタク</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2013005">キモい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1034420">オタク</xref>
@@ -11,1 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>uber-geek</gloss>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>creepy geek</gloss>
+<gloss>disgusting otaku</gloss>

as an abbreviation, i guess it's better separate

Ok

We could make it an sK on パーティー instead?

Only seeing it used to mean "pearly" in a company name

パーティーを開く	15397
パーリーを開く	0

I don't think パーリー is used on its own to mean "party", except to imitate an American accent.
I can't find a source for "pearly". Doesn't appear to be used outside of names.
I think this entry can be deleted.

twitter live search
6 hits past 24 hrs

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>パーリピーポー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パーリ・ピーポー</reb>

G n-grams:
パーリーピーポー	402
パーリー・ピーポー	<20
パーティピープル	390
パーティ・ピープル	263
パーティーピープル	1104
パーティー・ピープル	187

I'm proposing to move パーティーピープル/パーティピープル into another entry, mainly to allow this to be linked to パーリー and  パリピ without making a mess.

@@ -10,6 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>パーティピープル</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>パーティ・ピープル</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2829873">パーティーピープル</xref>

http://s.weddingpark.net/magazine/1748/

would do a twittwr live search to check which 
is more common, but on the phobe atm

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パーティピープル</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パーティ・ピープル</reb>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1218693817

obvious construction

Daijr, Koj (same as 片泊まり)

can't hurt, i guess

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">Intel-based computers running Windows</gloss>

Daijs, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wintel

Do we need to explain it?

GG5, 医学英和辞典, Readers+

Eijiro, Wikij G n-grams:
ケモメトリクス	126
ケモメトリックス	1693
計量化学	75

LSD, Wikij

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/メタプログラミング
G n-grams: 2k

GG5, Kagaku, etc.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>fluorescent brightener</gloss>
+<gloss>fluorescent bleach</gloss>

wiki:蛍光染料

Kagaku

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&chem;</field>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/増白

JWN

Definitely not a barbecue.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>

wiki

mil?

Lingdic

www

Not a proverb.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&proverb;</misc>

G n-grams:
傍らに人無きが如し	107
傍らに人無きがごとし	36
傍らに人なきがごとし	32

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>傍らに人無きがごとし</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>傍らに人なきがごとし</keb>

https://kotobank.jp/word/傍らに�%
BA%E7%84%A1%E3%81%8D%E3%81%8C%E5%A6%82%E3%81%97-463845

eij, wiki

I don't think the proposed revision is very useful to the typical user of this dictionary. There may be scope somewhere for detailed etymological and morphological information about these sorts of terms, but I don't think this is the place.
I'm reverting the entry to the 2016 original so that the comments remain visible. I'll reopen it for a while in case there is further discussion.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -14,11 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>連用形 of ～ぬ acting as a conjunction</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<s_inf>used at sentence end; old 終止形 of ～ぬ</s_inf>
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>not doing</gloss>

After some consideration, the translation on [1] should be changed as conjunctive ず is not properly represented by it: this ず conflates coordination and negation into a single morpheme, english has no such morpheme and thus lacks a direct translation. I have considered something such as "does/will not... and..." but that seemed confusing without an example sentence so I opted for an explanatory definition that is, hopefully, clear enough.

I realise I have forgotten to say why I have removed the notes on connection: I did so as I assume the notes will compel a reader to click the cross-reference to ぬ, leading them to learn that from there.

An additional idea that came to mind: this entry could be merged with ぬ by adding ず as a reading and adding this glossary to its, it would only need a few "as ～ず" or "as ～ぬ" to be added to the notes, the same could be done with ん. This practice could be applied to merge other entries that are variations of the same thing and with that trim down the number of individual entries with the benefit of consolidating currently scattered items under their corresponding set.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>

The notes only do two things: tell you what it is and tell you what it does. Do you presuppose that a reader does not wish to know either or neither of these things?
Of course shoving 連用形 or "conjunction" in there will not automatically allow them to directly download information concerning those concepts unto their brain, I truly hope you did not think this to have been my intent. 
The terms are put there so that the reader may research them on their own, they can even be researched back with this dictionary if someone wishes to research through translation. Could you construct an argument against these points, so that we can have a productive discussion and make a better entry?
The information is not there to "cater to grammar nerds" as you so creatively put, it is there to teach the language: grammar plays an important part of second-language acquisition for many, especially adults, even more so when there is such a disparity between the structures of Japanese and several Indo-European languages. Did you learn Japanese without studying any form of grammar? I would doubt that unless you grew up using Japanese.

"連用形" etc. isn't helpful. 99% of users won't know what it's a reference to. If you really were as smart as you seem to think, you'd realize the goal here isn't to cater to the 1% elite grammer nerds

daijs, daijr

Entry was missing the information that ず can form a conjunction.
Added second sense as terminal ず can still be found in set phrases as well as certain media.
Opted for 連用形 and 終止形 over translations as the original Japanese can likely be researched with less potential of wrong results than something such as connective form or terminal form, they can also be looked up within the dictionary whereas translations cannot.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +14,11 @@
-<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>not doing</gloss>
+<s_inf>連用形 of ～ぬ acting as a conjunction</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<s_inf>used at sentence end; old 終止形 of ～ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>

I don't think the proposed revision is very useful to the typical user of this dictionary. There may be scope somewhere for detailed etymological and morphological information about these sorts of terms, but I don't think this is the place.
I'm reverting the entry to the 2016 original so that the comments remain visible. I'll reopen it for a while in case there is further discussion.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -14,11 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>連用形 of ～ぬ acting as a conjunction</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<s_inf>used at sentence end; old 終止形 of ～ぬ</s_inf>
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>not doing</gloss>

After some consideration, the translation on [1] should be changed as conjunctive ず is not properly represented by it: this ず conflates coordination and negation into a single morpheme, english has no such morpheme and thus lacks a direct translation. I have considered something such as "does/will not... and..." but that seemed confusing without an example sentence so I opted for an explanatory definition that is, hopefully, clear enough.

I realise I have forgotten to say why I have removed the notes on connection: I did so as I assume the notes will compel a reader to click the cross-reference to ぬ, leading them to learn that from there.

An additional idea that came to mind: this entry could be merged with ぬ by adding ず as a reading and adding this glossary to its, it would only need a few "as ～ず" or "as ～ぬ" to be added to the notes, the same could be done with ん. This practice could be applied to merge other entries that are variations of the same thing and with that trim down the number of individual entries with the benefit of consolidating currently scattered items under their corresponding set.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>

The notes only do two things: tell you what it is and tell you what it does. Do you presuppose that a reader does not wish to know either or neither of these things?
Of course shoving 連用形 or "conjunction" in there will not automatically allow them to directly download information concerning those concepts unto their brain, I truly hope you did not think this to have been my intent. 
The terms are put there so that the reader may research them on their own, they can even be researched back with this dictionary if someone wishes to research through translation. Could you construct an argument against these points, so that we can have a productive discussion and make a better entry?
The information is not there to "cater to grammar nerds" as you so creatively put, it is there to teach the language: grammar plays an important part of second-language acquisition for many, especially adults, even more so when there is such a disparity between the structures of Japanese and several Indo-European languages. Did you learn Japanese without studying any form of grammar? I would doubt that unless you grew up using Japanese.

"連用形" etc. isn't helpful. 99% of users won't know what it's a reference to. If you really were as smart as you seem to think, you'd realize the goal here isn't to cater to the 1% elite grammer nerds

I would question what the typical user is like, what they look for when using a dictionary, and whether the first two questions can be reliably answered at all.

Anyhow, disregard the morphology for a moment, I feel the functional aspects of the explanatory gloss and the [conj] tag were overlooked. There is nothing in the entry to suggest that ず is a conjunction, and not treating it as one will yield the wrong understanding of a phrase. 

The translation "Not doing" is a progressive negation while ず is a negation, a conjunction, and only progressive if the structure it is negating is. "Not" is a closer translation, but is still missing the conjunction part.
Going off of this entry as is, one could very well take a 食べず as "not eating" instead of "does not/will not eat and..."
Furthermore, with only an [aux-v] tag, a reader will most likely think this is the 連体形・終止形 dictionary form that ends a sentence or pre-modifies a noun. This is only worsened by ず ending with a -u, which is usually a characteristic of those forms.
That is not good as treating it as the dictionary form will analyse something such as「驚きもせず私達をながく見つめていた」with 驚きもせず as a premodifier for 私達. 

I tried to to address this with the notes on the 連用形, the tag and the explanatory gloss, I can see why all at once may seem superfluous but hold that at least one is required to solve the matter.
I will insist on the addition of the tag and the explanatory note, with the latter either as a complement or substitute for the translation as "not doing" does not do a good job of relaying what this word does. 
If nothing else, at least the tag should be kept since it is what the word is - but the note instead of or along with the translation could be immediately useful to anyone who does not know what a conjunction is.

As for morphology: it already occupies a place in many entries, notes like the -nai stem note here are morphological in nature and I can only imagine these are accepted while others are not as they allow identification through the morphology of the surrounding items. 
With that standard in mind, since the current entry runs into the suru class -nai stem problem of leaving a reader unable to identify せず and instead implicating しず, I propose changes to it in line with what was done to せる・させる.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -11,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>not doing</gloss>
+<s_inf>connects to -nai stem of 五段, 一段 and カ変 verbs and to サ変 as せ～ず</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">negates a verb and continues onto next sentence</gloss>

I don't think the proposed revision is very useful to the typical user of this dictionary. There may be scope somewhere for detailed etymological and morphological information about these sorts of terms, but I don't think this is the place.
I'm reverting the entry to the 2016 original so that the comments remain visible. I'll reopen it for a while in case there is further discussion.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -14,11 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>連用形 of ～ぬ acting as a conjunction</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<s_inf>used at sentence end; old 終止形 of ～ぬ</s_inf>
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>not doing</gloss>

After some consideration, the translation on [1] should be changed as conjunctive ず is not properly represented by it: this ず conflates coordination and negation into a single morpheme, english has no such morpheme and thus lacks a direct translation. I have considered something such as "does/will not... and..." but that seemed confusing without an example sentence so I opted for an explanatory definition that is, hopefully, clear enough.

I realise I have forgotten to say why I have removed the notes on connection: I did so as I assume the notes will compel a reader to click the cross-reference to ぬ, leading them to learn that from there.

An additional idea that came to mind: this entry could be merged with ぬ by adding ず as a reading and adding this glossary to its, it would only need a few "as ～ず" or "as ～ぬ" to be added to the notes, the same could be done with ん. This practice could be applied to merge other entries that are variations of the same thing and with that trim down the number of individual entries with the benefit of consolidating currently scattered items under their corresponding set.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>

The notes only do two things: tell you what it is and tell you what it does. Do you presuppose that a reader does not wish to know either or neither of these things?
Of course shoving 連用形 or "conjunction" in there will not automatically allow them to directly download information concerning those concepts unto their brain, I truly hope you did not think this to have been my intent. 
The terms are put there so that the reader may research them on their own, they can even be researched back with this dictionary if someone wishes to research through translation. Could you construct an argument against these points, so that we can have a productive discussion and make a better entry?
The information is not there to "cater to grammar nerds" as you so creatively put, it is there to teach the language: grammar plays an important part of second-language acquisition for many, especially adults, even more so when there is such a disparity between the structures of Japanese and several Indo-European languages. Did you learn Japanese without studying any form of grammar? I would doubt that unless you grew up using Japanese.

koj

Daijr, G n-grams: 1800
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_Japanese_words_of_Dutch_origin

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

See 2857565.

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&vidg;</field>
+<gloss>buff (positive status effect)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, Readers+, recent Translators' FB discussion

I don't think this is really a place. If it stays it should be "Calpis".

Reopen.

I know an Akiyo whose name is written this way. She says she doesn't know anyone else with that kanji/reading combination.

Approving to get it out there, then reopening.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クラムボン_(バンド)