Merging with 2297120.

達頼喇嘛	46
ダライラマ	37244
ダライ・ラマ	101884

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Dropping.

@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ダライ・ラマー</reb>
-</r_ele>

Cannot find any evidence (ngrams, www) for ダライ・ラマー (or ダライラマー)
Maybe it should be in neither here nor in the name dict

N-grams:
達頼喇嘛	46
ダライラマ	37244
ダライ・ラマー	<20
ダライ・ラマ

These are in JMnedict. Should be part of this entry too.

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダライ・ラマ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダライ・ラマー</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

I agree that 吐く should be visible here. It's not even rare enough for rK.
I think 嘘を付く is common enough for iK.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Refs only have 吐 for うそつき, うそをつけ, and other derived expressions. I think 付 is actually irregular here.

嘘を吐く is also in jitsuyou, which doesn't have 嘘を付く.

I hid the 付 form on うそつき (where it's rarer) so maybe it's best to do the same here for consistency.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>嘘を付く</keb>
+<keb>嘘を吐く</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>嘘を吐く</keb>
+<keb>嘘を付く</keb>

It's in nikk so could get an rK but for expressions I feel it's better to hide unusual kanji.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 嘘をつく　 │ 195,695 │ 62.8% │
│ 嘘を付く　 │  11,053 │  3.5% │
│ 嘘を吐く　 │   9,435 │  3.0% │
│ ウソを付く │   1,673 │  0.5% │ - sK
│ ウソを吐く │     558 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ うそを付く │     310 │  0.1% │ - sK
│ うそを吐く │     114 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ うそをつく │  35,012 │ 11.2% │
│ ウソをつく │  57,704 │ 18.5% │ - nokanji
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +27 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,5 +30,0 @@
-<re_restr>嘘をつく</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘を付く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘を吐く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うそを付く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うそを吐く</re_restr>
@@ -35,2 +34 @@
-<re_restr>ウソを付く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>ウソを吐く</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

daijr: 嘘を言うこと。また，その人。

All the kokugos mention both the act and the person.
This isn't 形動 in any of the refs. I think adjectival use is quite informal and doesn't warrant an adj-na tag.
I think ウソつき can be hidden.

@@ -41 +41 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -45 +44,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -47,0 +47,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lying</gloss>

Usage of 付 seems to be irregular here

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 嘘つき　 │ 430,819 │ 56.5% │
│ 嘘吐き　 │  45,770 │  6.0% │
│ 嘘付き　 │   6,645 │  0.9% │ - sK
│ ウソ付き │   1,693 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ 嘘ツキ　 │   1,149 │  0.2% │
│ ウソ吐き │     468 │  0.1% │ - sK
│ 噓つき　 │     332 │  0.0% │
│ うそ付き │     119 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 噓吐き　 │      37 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ うそ吐き │      27 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 噓付き　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ 噓ツキ　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ うそつき │ 187,536 │ 24.6% │
│ ウソつき │  53,480 │  7.0% │ - nokanji; dropping restrictions
│ ウソツキ │  34,217 │  4.5% │
│ うそツキ │      64 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +29 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +33 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -31,6 +36,0 @@
-<re_restr>嘘つき</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘吐き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘付き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うそ付き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>噓吐き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うそ吐き</re_restr>
@@ -41,2 +41 @@
-<re_restr>ウソ付き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>ウソ吐き</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Better?

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>looking forward to</gloss>
+<gloss>longed-for</gloss>

待ちどうしい was given the reading まちどおしい

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<re_restr>待ち遠しい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>待遠しい</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +23,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まちどうしい</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

N-grams

It's not really "io", and it's more common than 待遠しい.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>待遠しい</keb>
+<keb>待ちどうしい</keb>
@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<keb>待ちどうしい</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>待遠しい</keb>

You're right. I just switched out the pn for n without thinking carefully about it.

i have some problems with this being a noun.  a) i don't see a ref for it, b) if anything, it should be a pronoun not a noun, c) it doesn't really make sense because it's not used as a noun.  the も is still clearly acting as a particle because you just say 誰も知らない not 誰もは知らない.  just exp makes the most sense, as in daijr

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

temp approve

"連語" in daijr.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>

誰も知らない. Great film.

gg5, prog, daij

Added sense.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to hand out</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,10 @@
-<gloss>to deal (cards)</gloss>
+<gloss>to deal out</gloss>
+<gloss>to serve out</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to allot</gloss>
+<gloss>to allocate</gloss>
+<gloss>to place (staff, soldiers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to station</gloss>

Reported.

There's a marker for a sound file, but clicking it doesn't seem to play anything.

koj

gg5 eig
----
G n-grams:
ついていく	381474
ついて行く	132942
付いていく	 72884
付いて行く	 48862
ついてゆく	 21539
付いてゆく	  2367

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -32,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>to keep up with</gloss>

G n-grams

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&male;</misc>

G n-grams:
 僕たち	1305901
 僕達	 515494
 ぼくたち	 349852

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<keb>僕達</keb>
+<keb>僕たち</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8 +9 @@
-<keb>僕たち</keb>
+<keb>僕達</keb>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -14,2 +16 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>

あなた方	499443
貴方がた	10993
貴方方	14135
貴方々	459

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams:
あなた方	499443
あなたがた	431668
貴方がた	 10993
貴方方	 14135
貴方々	   459

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Fingers crossed that the indices are OK now.

Reopen.

OK. Done. I'll reopen to remind me to do something about the sentences. There are over 600 and now they'll be linked to both entries.

@@ -18,4 +17,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちょう</reb>
-<re_restr>町</re_restr>
@@ -41,12 +36,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>町</stagk>
-<stagr>ちょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>chō (unit of length, approx. 109.09 m)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>町</stagk>
-<stagr>ちょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>chō (unit of land area, approx. 0.99 hectares)</gloss>

I think this merge is rather messy. I propose splitting out ちょう.

prog

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Daijr, Koj (both lead with 山樝子, which has a JIS 212/213 kanji)

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>山樝子</keb>

according to EOL, this is the status of Crataegus apiifolia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hort.

Daijr, Unidic/ngrams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crataegus_cuneata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crataegus_apiifolia

Is "Crataegus apiifolia" just an error? I think it's the European one.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>山楂子</keb>
@@ -17,3 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>hawthorn</gloss>
-<gloss>Crataegus cuneata</gloss>
-<gloss>Crataegus apiifolia</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese hawthorn (Crataegus cuneata)</gloss>

I have emailed the submitter.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>원</gloss>
+<gloss>만원</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>fulfilment of a vow</gloss>
+<gloss>원</gloss>
+<gloss>일수를 정하여 신불(神佛)에 발원한 그 기한이 참 fulfilment of a vow</gloss>

GG5

Aligning.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1435540">定休日・ていきゅうび</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>fixed day off</gloss>
+<gloss>regular closing day</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>to stop smoking</gloss>

G n-grams:
タバコをやめる	29515
タバコを止める	10431
たばこをやめる	 4448
煙草をやめる	 3086
煙草を止める	 2203
たばこを止める	 1137

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タバコを止める</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>煙草をやめる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +14 @@
-<keb>煙草をやめる</keb>
+<keb>たばこを止める</keb>
@@ -11 +17,2 @@
-<reb>たばこをやめる</reb>
+<reb>タバコをやめる</reb>
+<re_restr>タバコを止める</re_restr>
@@ -14,2 +21,4 @@
-<reb>タバコをやめる</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>たばこをやめる</reb>
+<re_restr>煙草をやめる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>煙草を止める</re_restr>
+<re_restr>たばこを止める</re_restr>
@@ -19,0 +29 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

n-grams
煙草を止めた	48
煙草をやめた	82
たばこをやめた	90
たばこを止めた	29
タバコをやめた	276

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タバコをやめる</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Duplicate

Seiichi Makino and Michio Tsutsui "A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar", 1994 (ISBN 4-7890-0454-6) p. 486

One of the most common usages of という as a conjunction between clauses of a complex sentence somehow is omitted in the dictionary

@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>A conjunction, which introduces a noun clause, often after verbs of thinking, saying, believing, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>that</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

G n-grams:
という	433136380
と言う	 35628652
とゆう	  1034817

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Good point.

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>as ...という...</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ＡというＡ</s_inf>

Perhaps the note for sense 3 could still include letters? Currently it just looks like という is in the middle of something, while the letters make it clear that it's preceded and followed by the same noun.

gg5

I think we can avoid using "X"s in the glosses.

@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@
-<s_inf>in the pattern ＸというＸ</s_inf>
-<gloss>all X</gloss>
-<gloss>every X</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...という...</s_inf>
+<gloss>all ...</gloss>
+<gloss>every single ...</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

Trying to handle the あなた family is quite a challenge. I think this one is OK for now.

daijr 二人称。ごく親しい人や目下の人をさし示す。
nikk
１ 近世後期、上位者に用いた。最初は遊里で用いられ、のち、一般化。＊洒・北廓鶏卵方「あんたはこねへだの京町のしわくちゃを」
２ 現代、多く下位者に用いる。東京では卑俗な言い方であるが、関西では親愛の気持で言う。

I'm not sure if this should have a fam and or a derog tag, or just col.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10109199230
東京中西部です。「おやじ」「オバサン」という呼称が似合いそうな初老男女のごく一部を除いて、「あんた」という語をまず口にすることに出会いません。もちろ
ん、「あんた」という語に感じる語感は、「下品で無教養」です。

大阪ですが、ほとんど使いません。家族や仲の良い友達にも、喧嘩ぐらいの時に昔は使ったかも、程度です。
品のないおばちゃんは使ってる人がいます。あまり良い言葉とは思えません。初めて会った人に言われた時はびっくりしました。
「下品な人！」って思ってしまいました。

うちは関西圏なので
わりと普通に使われますが
地域によっては ダメでしょうね。

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1496568274
Q: ... 私は自分の両親から
『どんなに仲良くても どんなに仲が悪くても, 人に向かって絶対に“あんた”と言ってはいけない』 ...
A: 関西在住ですが、人間関係が親密ならOKですが、そうでない場合、完全に上から目線でないと、出てこないと思います。 ...
質問者様のご両親の意見に賛同します。
身内以外で、使うと「品がない」ととられかねない言葉なんですよ。
差別語というより、人を見下した、表現、と思います。

https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/1144271.html
私も、見ず知らずの人に急に「あんた」って言われたら、かなりむっとします。コンビニの店員に、「あんた」って言われたら、まず間違いなく「なんだその口調
は？」と言い返すと思います。 ... ちなみに東京では、親しくても「あんた」はまず使いませんし、たいていの場合は馬鹿にされていると思うのではないでしょう
か？私は、だいたいの場合は名前で呼びますね。

自分より立場が上の人が使うのは，当然ですが，
会話のなかで，そんな風に呼ばれたくないです。
ちゃんと名前で「○○さん」と呼んでほしいです。
以前に仕事中に上司から「あんたが・・」と言われました。（関西出身の方）
聞いたとき，イヤな気分でした。たとえ上司からであっても。

私の意見は、「親しんだ相手に」ということで、
もちろん初対面では若干失礼だと感じます。
でも、関西や中国地方だと、その失礼度も薄いの
かもしれませんね。

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1223615">貴方・あなた・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1223615">貴方・あなた・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1223615">貴方・あなた・1</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<s_inf>familiar form of あなた</s_inf>
+<s_inf>familiar form of あなた; oft. considered rude</s_inf>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams:
あんた	3982092

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -14 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>you (familiar form of anata)</gloss>
+<s_inf>familiar form of あなた</s_inf>
+<gloss>you</gloss>

See comments on 2847553.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>嘘付け</keb>
+<keb>嘘吐け</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,2 +12,2 @@
-<keb>嘘吐け</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>嘘付け</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -31 +31,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1172460">嘘つき</xref>

うそつけ	11040	24.5%
嘘つけ	19380	43.0%
嘘付け	4110	9.1%
嘘吐け	657	1.5%
うそ付け	123	0.3%
ウソつけ	9248	20.5%
ウソ付け	475	1.1%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,4 +23,0 @@
-<re_restr>嘘つけ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘付け</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嘘吐け</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うそ付け</re_restr>
@@ -28 +27 @@
-<re_restr>ウソ付け</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

I liked "fibber".

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>fibber</gloss>

https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/15734/

Editing the glosses to make them sound more like interjections. We may also want to consider an entry 
for 嘘をつけ, which means the same thing and is equally confusing for someone seeing it for the first 
time.

@@ -33,0 +34,2 @@
+<gloss>you're lying</gloss>
+<gloss>yeah, right</gloss>
@@ -35 +36,0 @@
-<gloss>fibber</gloss>

G n-grams:
誰も彼も  	37958
誰もかれも	 6921
だれもかれも	5008
だれも彼も	  415

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>誰もかれも</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>だれも彼も</keb>
@@ -12 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る・1</xref>

not uk - 行ってきます gets the most hits on google.

@@ -21,1 +21,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2172760">行って来る</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

Entry created

OK. Indexed now.

Reopen.

Since we're tagging it as "exp" I think the "to", etc. should be included fully.
There are ~140 sentences using this. I'd like to set up examples for each sense, so I;ll approve and then reopen.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to everyone</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by everyone</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in anyone</gloss>

Should the to's, by's, and in's really be in brackets, when they're all what's differentiating the different senses?

Sense 1 examples:
だれにも言うなよ - don't say it *to* anyone
誰にも明白だ - it's clear *to* everyone
Sense 2 examples:
誰にも止められない - can't be stopped *by* anyone
誰にも気付かれずに - unnoticed *by* everyone
誰にもできる仕事 - job that can be done *by* anyone
Sense 3 examples:
誰にも夢がある - everyone has dreams / [lit] there are dreams *in* everyone
誰にも過ちがある - everyone makes mistakes / [lit] there are mistakes *in* everyone

I'd like to suggest splitting the senses according to the uses of に, so that each sense has a different meaning. "Anyone" can appear in positive sentences so I don't think a positive/negative split is the way to go.
For this proposed split to work, we'd need example sentences indexed for each sense, but I think this approach is ultimately clearer.
I should note that even with this split, a single sense may contain multiple meanings of に.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
-<s_inf>effectively 誰も with に</s_inf>
+<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
@@ -21,5 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>
-<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) none</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>

G n-grams:
誰々	71833
だれだれ	46557
誰誰	 4066

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>誰誰</keb>
+<keb>誰々</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>誰々</keb>
+<keb>誰誰</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<s_inf>adv. equivalent of 誰でも</s_inf>
-<gloss>anyone (used with positive verbs)</gloss>
+<s_inf>adv. equivalent of 誰でも; used with positive verbs</s_inf>
+<gloss>anyone</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams:
誰にでも	1307524
だれにでも	  85062

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

I think they should be in separate entries (誰でも and 誰だって too). I've proposed an entry.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>誰にだって</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +8,0 @@
-<re_restr>誰にでも</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>だれにだって</reb>
-<re_restr>誰にだって</re_restr>
@@ -18,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 行ってくる │ 382,456 │ 64.5% │
│ 行って来る │  97,284 │ 16.4% │
│ いって来る │   3,562 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ いってくる │ 109,961 │ 18.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I see it's on sense 2.

I know 行ってきます is an entry, but I wonder whether the "vk" should really be removed from here.

G n-grams:
行ってくる	382456
いってくる	109961
行って来る	 97284
いって来る	  3562

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>いって来る</keb>
+<keb>行ってくる</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>行ってくる</keb>
+<keb>いって来る</keb>
@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&vk;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijs/meikyo: "古くは「たれしも」とも"

"連語" in daijr/s

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たれしも</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -19 +23 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>no-one (with neg. verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>no-one</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>

N-grams:
コンセントレータ	3800
コンセントレーター	150

Merging 1052350.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コンセントレーター</reb>

Entry created

GG5 has 皀莢.

Wikipedia redirects 皀莢 to the article for 皂莢. Seems like it's "incorrect," but it's also the only form here without JIS 213 kanji.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 皀莢　　 │   688 │  3.8% │
│ 皂莢　　 │    93 │  0.5% │ <- meikyo, daijs, koj; adding
│ 皁莢　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ <- daijr, oukoku
│ さいかち │ 8,493 │ 46.6% │
│ サイカチ │ 8,951 │ 49.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>皂莢</keb>

Daijr, GG5

皁 is JIS 213.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>皁莢</keb>
@@ -17,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>honey locust</gloss>
-<gloss>Gleditsia japonica</gloss>
+<gloss>honey locust (Gleditsia japonica)</gloss>

Entry created

N-grams:
臈たける	No matches
臈長ける	No matches
臈闌ける	No matches
ろうたける	No matches
ろうたけた	342
臈長けた	218

中辞典 has an entry for 臈長けた and uses kana in the example.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

again, you are misinterpreting these.  if you have issues, bring them to the mailing list

daijirin, koj, daijisen, GG5

daijirin だれも一人として
koj: どの人も。一人として。
daijisen: だれも。一人も。
GG5: だれ一人(…ない)　no one; nobody; 《not》 anyone [anybody]. (so the _negation_ of だれ一人, not だれ一人, is no one)
だれ一人としてその知らせに喜ばぬ者はなかった.　Everyone was glad to hear the news. ｜ There was no one who didn't rejoice at the news.

Daijirin makes a point of it being used that way?
Yes, and a point of it meaning anyone/everyone.
How can the proposed amendment make the entry much less useful ...when the previous entry is the complete opposite of the truth?
How is that, at all useful? Not misleading?

According to the previous entry, 誰一人知らぬこと translates as "a thing no one doesn't know", which is to say "a thing everyone knows" ...when it actually translates as "a thing not a single person knows"

@@ -19,8 +19 @@
-<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
-<gloss>nobody</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss g_type="lit">anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>anyone</gloss>

Daijr: （打ち消しの語を伴って）だれも一人として。 「 −知らぬこと」 「 −として同情しない」
GG5: だれ一人(…ない) no one; nobody; 《not》 anyone ［anybody］
だれ一人異を唱えなかった． No one ［Not a single person］ objected.
事件の真相はだれ一人知らなかった． Nobody (at all) knew the facts about the incident.
だれ一人会わなかった． I didn't 「see ［meet］ anyone ［a soul］.
だれ一人として彼に賛成するものはなかった． Not a single person agreed with him.

I think it's important to record how this is actually used. There are 18 example sentences, all of which use negative verbs and translate it as "no one; nobody". Daijirin makes a point of it being used that way. The proposed amendment would have made the entry much less useful.
(The proposed change to 一切 has a similar problem.)

@@ -19 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>anyone</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<gloss g_type="lit">anyone</gloss>

koj, daijirin, daijisen

@@ -19,3 +19 @@
-<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>no one</gloss>
-<gloss>nobody</gloss>
+<gloss>anyone</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>with negative verb</s_inf>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>

I'd just like to add that we include "no one"/"nobody" here for the same reason other JE dictionaries do: it's helpful. These are the most common English translations.
It's the same with 誰も. "誰も知らない" translates to "no one knows", not "everyone doesn't know". 
This difference in structure between English and Japanese is not especially difficult to grasp, especially in context.
I think excluding these glosses would actually be more confusing to a leaner.

koj: 
（下に打消の語を伴う）どの人も。一人として。「―気がつかない」
gg5:
だれ一人(…ない)　no one; nobody; 《not》 anyone [anybody].

"with neg. verb" is our way of indicating 下に打消の語を伴う as in koj or (…ない) as in gg5

I am restoring the version that was approved by Robin, Jim, and (now) me, which matches what GG5 has.

Rather than re-editing an entry approved by three of the editors, this is an issue for the mailing list. The entry for 誰一人 is not the place to relitigate how an entire class of entries is written.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>

Those last two senses were essentially duplicates, as well as going completely against the logic of the way the first two are written.

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>no one</gloss>
-<gloss>nobody</gloss>

I'm happy with this version. If anyone is considering at further edits, please look first at the September 09 discussion train in a rejected fork (Advanced Search and enable "Rejected".)

I don't think we need a separate sense, just a couple of glosses like this.
Not an adverb according to the kokugos.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -20 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) a single person</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
@@ -23,5 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss g_type="lit">anyone</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Koj, Daijr

daijs

daijr

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>噓っぽい</keb>

G n-grams:
嘘っぽい	36246
うそっぽい	 8624
ウソっぽい	13578

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウソっぽい</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

No need for an ant x-ref on an arch entry.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1465590">入る・はいる・1</xref>

I suspect so.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>出ず</re_restr>

is this supposed to have a いず[restr=出ず] ? currently lacking one

It looks good to me. With "arch" all over it, best not to try and straight-jacket it into our rules.

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5, nikk
===
koj, daijr, daijs, nikk have 出づ[いず] [v2d-s,vi]
meikyo and gg5 have 出ず[いず] [v2d-s,vi]
meikyo and daijr have 出づ[でづ] [v2d-s,vi]

very difficult to figure out what to do with this entry, though we should really have it.

should be written as 出ず[いず] in modern orthography, but is written as 出づ to avoid confusion with 出ず[でず] (i.e., the ~ず form of 出る[でる]).  出ず is [v2d-s] even though it ends with '-zu' not '-du'

G n-grams:
だれが見ても	11069
誰が見ても	156860

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>だれが見ても</keb>
+<keb>誰が見ても</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>誰が見ても</keb>
+<keb>だれが見ても</keb>

it may just be me, but i've never heard the expression "to any eye"...  sounds like a japanese attempt at english

@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>to any eye</gloss>

http://home.alc.co.jp/db/owa/s_htsrv_rep4?num_in=4131&char_in=04&char2_in=to  
http://www.excite.co.jp/dictionary/japanese_english/?search=だ&match=beginswith&dictionary=NEW_EJJE&block=63277&offset=1982&title=だれ+誰  
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/だれが見ても

G n-grams:
誰あろう	10752
だれあろう	702

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

新和英中辞典

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

http://www.freeenglish.jp/holmes/mb/h/3gar-c-025.html  
http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"none+other+than"  
http://www.freeenglish.jp/holmes/h/seco-t.html  
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/willmollywilly/6924739.html

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>suddenly lifting somebody's face by their chin (in a domineering yet romantic fashion)</gloss>
+<gloss>suddenly lifting someone's face by their chin (in a domineering yet romantic fashion)</gloss>

http://www.nippon.com/en/features/m00100/

A bit too new for the n-grams counts.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アゴクイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Very col.

http://matome.naver.jp/m/odai/214123415990
3906501
heard on TV

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>anyone (used with positive verbs)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used with verbs in the affirmative</s_inf>
+<gloss>anyone</gloss>

G n-grams:
誰にだって	57297
だれにだって	3630

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416850">誰でも・だれでも</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2098260">誰にでも・だれにでも</xref>

for the record, i checked meikyo.  it is the only of my sources that specifies a pos for -っぱなし entries, and it reports noun for all four of its entries, with no evidence that they consider it an exp:
あけっ‐ぱなし【開けっ放し（明けっ放し）】 = 名・形動
うちっ‐ぱなし【打ちっ放し】 = 名
かちっ‐ぱなし【勝ちっ放し】 = 名
やりっ‐ぱなし【▽遣りっ放し】 = 名

the only relevant entries with specified pos in daijs/daijr are also n, with none called 連語:
開けっ放し／明けっ放し = ［名・形動］
遣りっ放し =［名・形動］

even if you do consider it verb stem + suffix, as opposed to noun + suffix, we don't consider those expressions.  E.g., 乗りにくい is an adj-i, not exp,adj-i

なり is a noun

This is a verb + suffix. I'm surprised we don't consider this an expression.

っぱなし is a suffix.  in edict, noun+suffix = noun, not expression.  even compound nouns are not marked as expressions

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

This is an expression. Regular use of the っぱなし grammar point.
I don't think "howling" or "resounding" are good glosses.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -16,3 +17 @@
-<gloss>sounding continuously (e.g. phone)</gloss>
-<gloss>howling</gloss>
-<gloss>resounding</gloss>
+<gloss>sounding continuously (phone, alarm, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Koj, Daijr, GG5

The latest Daijr uses 夕蟬 with the JIS213 kanji.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

can't either

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>Lyristes japonicus</gloss>
+<gloss>Lyristes japonicus (species of cicada)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/エゾゼミ  N-grams:
えぞぜみ	31
蝦夷蝉	52
エゾゼミ	4088

Can't find a sound common name. Readers+ says lyreman/harvest fly/dog-day cicada.
GG5 has "Tibicen japonicus", but Wikip says this is the former name.

Eijiro, http://www.nippon.com/en/features/m00100/

Useful phrase, meaning not immediately obvious.

Eijiro

wiki

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

n-grams:
おせっかい屋	769
おせっかいや	1301
御節介屋	No matches
お節介屋	303

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お節介屋</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御節介屋</keb>
@@ -11,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>snoop</gloss>
+<gloss>meddler</gloss>
+<gloss>nosey parker</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>meddler</gloss>
-<gloss>nosey parker</gloss>

eij

https://kotobank.jp/word/ショウジョウエビ-79341 Daijr, n-grams:
しょうじょうえび	No matches
猩猩蝦	No matches
猩猩海老	No matches <- Daijr
猩々蝦	No matches
猩々海老	No matches
ショウジョウエビ	36

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&person;</misc>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&person;</misc>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&person;</misc>