meikyo
認められて広く通用する。通る。
「一〇秒を切れば世界に━」
「世界に━指揮者」

I've had a go at it, however the absence of this sense from 広辞苑, 大辞林 and GG5 makes me wonder whether it isn't rather marginal/ephemeral.

@@ -60,0 +60,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to spread widely</gloss>
+<gloss>to disseminate</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs (points to 通ずる): "４ 広く行き渡る。広い方面に通用する。「あだ名で―・ずる」「現代にも―・ずる問題」"

I don't think the sense in the daijs ref is covered so far, and I believe it's the same sense as in the form "今に通じる". E.g.:
"今に通じる大師の教え"
"中学生の頃の感想は今に通じるか？"
I don't see anything in my JEs that covers this, and I'm not sure what a good gloss would be (particularly that would also cover the first example from daijs).

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス (Daijr just says: "通ずる に同じ。"

Based mainly on GG5's sense split, which are a bit messy.
I'll change 通ずる to be the same.

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>to run to</gloss>
+<gloss>to be open (to traffic)</gloss>
@@ -21,4 +21,25 @@
-<gloss>to get across</gloss>
-<gloss>to get through</gloss>
-<gloss>to communicate</gloss>
-<gloss>to understand</gloss>
+<gloss>to communicate (with)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to flow (liquid, current)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pass</gloss>
+<gloss>to get through to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be understood</gloss>
+<gloss>to be comprehended</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be honored</gloss>
+<gloss>to be good</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be well versed in</gloss>
@@ -26,1 +47,12 @@
-<gloss>to come over</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to communicate clandestinely</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep in touch (e.g. with the enemy)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to form a liaison</gloss>
+<gloss>to be intimate</gloss>

OK. Done.

@@ -29,4 +28,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うっさい</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>

I think so. I'm seeing examples for each of them.

I agree about うっさい. Should it have all senses?

煩い	121168	4.5%
五月蝿い	112593	4.2%
五月蠅い	26896	1.0%
うるさい	2235184	83.8%
ウルサイ	133668	5.0%
うっさい	37562	1.4%

I think うっさい should be a separate [col]-tagged entry.
I don't think the int glosses need exclamation marks.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -62,2 +62,2 @@
-<gloss>shut up!</gloss>
-<gloss>be quiet!</gloss>
+<gloss>shut up</gloss>
+<gloss>be quiet</gloss>

not constitute as word or idiom.

@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<field>&print;</field>
@@ -48,0 +50 @@
+<field>&photo;</field>

I'm happy with "col".

@@ -27,1 +27,1 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

<quote>
ベタなテレビドラマ
= Beta na terebi dorama
= TV shows full of predictable behavior or lines.
...
adjective : ベタな/べたな= betana
Note : You can write them either in katakana or hiragana
It means cliché, stereotypical, too typical, corny, old hat
<unquote>
http://maggiesensei.com/2011/07/22/べた-ベタ-beta-colloquial/

It's marked as "slang" but I wonder if it's more of a 
*colloquial* term.

@@ -29,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>clichéd</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>corny</gloss>
+<gloss>predictable</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5, meikyo, shinmeikai

very commonly written as ベタ, which perhaps means that it should be merged with 1119610 though they obviously have different etymologies

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベタ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,3 +12,6 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2534890">べた組み</xref>
-<gloss>things without gaps or spaces between them</gloss>
-<gloss>something painted or printed solid</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. as べたに</s_inf>
+<gloss>covering</gloss>
+<gloss>filled in</gloss>
+<gloss>gapless</gloss>
+<gloss>all over</gloss>
@@ -14,3 +20,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>plain (e.g. plain text)</gloss>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<s_inf>before a noun</s_inf>
+<gloss>complete</gloss>
+<gloss>total</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +31,18 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>plaintext</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2534890">べた組み</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>solid printing</gloss>
+<gloss>solid typesetting</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2534900">べた焼き・1</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>contact print</gloss>
+</sense>

not ships etc., but pets.
daijs: "◆本罪のいう器物には、飼い犬などのペットも含まれる。電磁的記録、公用・
私用文書、建造物、船舶などは含まれない。"

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>(in law) property damage (not including ships, buildings, planes and documents)</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>property damage (not including ships, buildings, planes and documents)</gloss>

Entry created

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/秘密を侵す罪

and a number of google hits support it also

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

not constitute as word or idiom.

Entry created

Talking it over with the editors, it's agreed that this is not common enough to bother with.

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>キャラベン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>

Pretty low ngram count,
but it used on the web

G n-grams:
キャラベン	50
キャラ弁    319789

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャラベン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1512710">弁・べん・3</xref>

an amendment to the appropriate 弁[べん] has been suggested

ok
By the way, re:
"Kodansha says 弁: 弁当の略."
... it was actually Kojien, not Kodansha:

Drop it. Can this be labelled "dated" now?

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>"Galapagos" cell phone (Japanese brand)</gloss>

"Galapagos" cell phone (Japanese brand)
looks quite questionable to me.

en:WP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_phone

Add briefer gloss “feature phone”, which is the usual English 
term for this category of phones.
ガラケー is specifically Japanese though, so I’ve added 
(Japanese).

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<gloss>(Japanese) feature phone</gloss>

Matching up glosses with 2749820 (下手をすると).

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>if things don't go well</gloss>

daijs, nikk, eij

relatively unambiguous merge.  rejecting here, leaving suggested amendment to 2251160 open

koj

2251160 is the べん in question for べんとう.  i've suggested a merge there

Sorry ... it was Kojien, not Kodansha.

See  2685630: "Kodansha says 弁: 弁当の略"

I am putting this up for discussion. We have already:
弁(P);辯(oK) [べん] /(n) (1) speech/(n-suf) (2) dialect/
弁;辨(oK) [べん] /(n) (See 太政官,弁官) Oversight Department...
弁;瓣(oK) [べん] /(n) (1) petal/(2) valve/
They really can't be merged as in each case they derive from distinct kanji (辯, etc.) which have all simplified to 弁.
Do we want a 4th 弁/べん entry (this one doesn't really belong in any of the other 3), or do we do a messy merge, perhaps with those old kanji as comments?

gg5, eij

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -13,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>to give a fight</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a fight</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=一戦を交える

gg5, eij

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>tactician</gloss>
+<gloss>strategist</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/策略家

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インターネット・ポリス</reb>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/インターネットポリス

gg5, wisdom waei

probably not strictly necessary, but harmless

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to meet together in a hall</gloss>
-<gloss>to meet together in a room</gloss>
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<gloss>to assemble (in a hall)</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet together (in a room)</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/256048/m0u/

Indeed. Your version sounds fine.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/チャラ男

These glosses sound really old-fashioned. Especially considering this word is a slang used by young people.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>shallow playboy</gloss>

daijs

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ちゃら男</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>チャラ男</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちゃらお</reb>
+<re_restr>ちゃら男</re_restr>
@@ -12,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2796890">チャラ子</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2796890">チャラ子</xref>

Daijr

I guess that gloss tells the story OK.

I don't think we need to mention this in the gloss.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>taking food directly from a communal dish with one's own chopsticks (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>
+<gloss>taking food directly from a communal dish with one's own chopsticks</gloss>

trimmed down a little

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>way to take the food from plate directory with one's own chopstick.</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2161090">取り箸</xref>
+<gloss>taking food directly from a communal dish with one's own chopsticks (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>

"directory" should be "directly"
.
How about 
"taking food directly from a communal dish with one's own chopsticks (rather than 
using special chopsticks to transfer food to each person's bowl, as is the custom 
in Japan); See 取り箸"
?
Examples are not numerous but it might be possible to consider it a "vs":
直箸するのやめてくれませんか

http://kotobank.jp/word/直箸