Merged with 2463970.

gg5, meikyo, daijr

Added sense.
I don't think we need "ceiling moulding".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>bellows (camera, accordion, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>bellows (of an accordion, camera, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&archit;</field>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>ceiling molding</gloss>
-<gloss>ceiling moulding</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +25,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pleated shape</gloss>
+<gloss>accordion pleats</gloss>
+<gloss>pleated flexible design</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr/s, prog, JWN

daijr/s have some more, [abbr] senses.

@@ -12,1 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>(camera) bellows</gloss>
+<gloss>bellows (camera, accordion, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cornice</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>design of parallel lines</gloss>
-<gloss>cornice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>rickrack</gloss>
+<gloss>ricrac</gloss>
+<gloss>wave-shaped braid</gloss>

Nonsense.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Daijr: (とが)  ずが（図画） 」に同じ。
GG5, etc.

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とが</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>painting</gloss>
+<gloss>picture</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/排水溝

@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>gutter</gloss>
+<gloss>ditch</gloss>

daijr/s

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

daijr/s

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

Seems to be a superfluous ; in the meaning.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone to a place)</gloss>

gg5

Yes. We put the direct object in brackets.
I think this is clearer. "(someone, somewhere)" could be read as "someone OR somewhere".

@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) with one</gloss>
+<gloss>to take along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead away</gloss>

brackets around "someone" as it's vt, right?

@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>to take someone (to some place)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take someone along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead someone away</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>

"vaguely" is in gg5, but I think it is too vague

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>vaguely</gloss>
+<gloss>without knowing why</gloss>

not sure i care for 'uncertainly', and it's not in the ref in any case

@@ -24,1 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>uncertainly</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/なんとなく

@@ -23,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>vaguely</gloss>
+<gloss>uncertainly</gloss>

I don't think the xref helps.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1737890">水ぶくれ</xref>

daijs:
やけどで皮膚の下に体液がたまってはれること。

水疱	64573	38.3%　<-- medical

-- everyday use:
水ぶくれ	84781	50.3%
水膨れ	9335	5.5%
水脹れ	5360	3.2%

火ぶくれ	3396	2.0%
火膨れ	405	0.2%
火脹れ	441	0.3%
ひぶくれ	147	0.1%

reversed the order of the kanji.  Prefer 火膨れ by analogy with 水膨れ・水脹れ

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>火脹れ</keb>
+<keb>火ぶくれ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>火ぶくれ</keb>
+<keb>火脹れ</keb>
@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>blister</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1737890">水ぶくれ</xref>
+<gloss>blister (due to a burn)</gloss>

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>a blister</gloss>
+<gloss>blister</gloss>

The added headword was in the text which I was reading. It gets a resonable number of Google hits.

You also have the following:-

火ぶくれ 【ひぶくれ】 (n) blister; WI1
火ぶくれ 【ひぶくれ】 (?) ???; RH

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>火ぶくれ</keb>

G n-grams:
目っけ物	339
めっけもの	6143
めっけもん	30762

Yes, they were rearranged.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>めっけもの</reb>
+<reb>めっけもん</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>めっけもん</reb>
+<reb>めっけもの</reb>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/めっけもん

The Submit button has become dislocated and history goes backwards.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>めっけもん</reb>

daijr/s, prog, 研究社 新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unbelievable good luck</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpected good fortune</gloss>
+</sense>

wiki, etc.

I think this is the more common name.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>hyaluronic acid</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>hyaluronic acid</gloss>

Hyaluronan (also called hyaluronic acid or hyaluronate or HA) is an anionic, nonsulfated 
glycosaminoglycan distributed widely throughout connective, epithelial, and neural tissues.
---- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyaluronan

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>hyaluronan</gloss>

Agree.

daijr/s, prog (split)
JWN (combines)
Luminous (just has an entry for あかあか in kana)

-We have entries for 明明/明々 and 赤赤/赤々, and I've submitted updates to make them both [adv,adv-to], so I don't think we need this entry. Could move some or all of the glosses from here into those entries.
-daijr/s consider these two separate, but JWN combines them, giving the definition "brightly, brilliantly, bright". Luminous's あかあか entry gives "brightly; blaze". We could have an xref between the entries if we want them connected somehow.

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end; used to expressed one's thoughts or feelings</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; used to express one's thoughts or feelings</s_inf>

OK, reindexing that sentence to sense 5.
There are over 1000 sentences using ね but most don't have senses tagged. Good to have some for senses 3 and 4.

daij, meikyo, chujiten, prog, gg5, DBJG

More senses.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end; indicates emphasis, agreement, request for confirmation, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; used as a request for confirmation or agreement</s_inf>
@@ -21 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>don't you think</gloss>
+<gloss>isn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>doesn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you think?</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>say</gloss>
+<gloss>listen</gloss>
+<gloss>look</gloss>
@@ -27,6 +33,28 @@
-<gloss>listen</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>and so</gloss>
-<gloss>then</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; used to expressed one's thoughts or feelings</s_inf>
+<gloss>you know</gloss>
+<gloss>you see</gloss>
+<gloss>I must say</gloss>
+<gloss>I should think</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; used to make an informal request</s_inf>
+<gloss>will you?</gloss>
+<gloss>please</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>at the end of a non-final clause; used to draw the listener's attention to something</s_inf>
+<gloss>so, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>well, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>you see, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>you understand?</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>at sentence end after the question marker か</s_inf>
+<gloss>I'm not sure if ...</gloss>
+<gloss>I have my doubts about whether ...</gloss>

GG5 (sense 4): 〔語調を整える時〕
それでね, 私ね, 泣いちゃったの. And so then..., then I just started crying.
だからね, そういう時はこうやってね, ほら, ちゃんと見てて. So that's why when that happens, you do this. Watch now!
いやあ, 私はですね, そんなつもりは全然なかったんですがねえ. No! You see, that's not what I meant, not at all.

A recent Tatoeba amendment results in: "彼ね、学校を退学になったの。 He ended up expelled." 
I was trying to link the "ね" and AFAICT it's not covered here yet, but seems to be this sense in GG5's entry. I'll link it here anyway.

@@ -27,0 +28,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>and so</gloss>
+<gloss>then</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>at the close of a book, film, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at the end of a novel, film, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>providing fully</gloss>
+<gloss>full provision</gloss>

koj, daijr, gg5, shinmeikai, meikyo

also has broader usage

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>The End (book, film, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>at the close of a book, film, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>The End</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>completion</gloss>
+<gloss>conclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>end</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>providing fully</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

additional headwords from shinmeikai, restriction from daijr

@@ -11,0 +11,6 @@
+<keb>鳩酸草</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>酢母草</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +22,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カタバミ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +27,4 @@
+<stagk>酢漿草</stagk>
+<stagk>酸漿草</stagk>
+<stagk>鳩酸草</stagk>
+<stagk>酢母草</stagk>
@@ -18,2 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>wood sorrel</gloss>
-<gloss>oxalis (esp. Oxalis corniculata)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>creeping woodsorrel (Oxalis corniculata)</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +37,1 @@
-<gloss>family crest shaped like wood sorrel</gloss>
+<gloss>family crest shaped like creeping woodsorrel</gloss>

wiki daij nikk

seems like this might refer only to Oxalis corniculata. not sure.

@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>酸漿草</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>片喰</keb>
@@ -13,1 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>oxalis</gloss>
+<gloss>oxalis (esp. Oxalis corniculata)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>family crest shaped like wood sorrel</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

GG5 (examples)

I think this should stay, as it's more common than the others, and it's good to have something for "persona non grata". I have proposed an entry for 好ましからざる alone.

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>an unwelcome person</gloss>
+<gloss>unwelcome person</gloss>
+<gloss>undesirable person</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/好ましからざる

I ran across this as 好ましからざる者, using 者 rather than 人間,
and the 者 version gets 27.7k google hits. So I was thinking that, rather than adding a new definition for 者, it might be better to modify this entry to be a more generic adjectival form of "好ましからざる" (as at the reference link). But since I'm not sure, I'll leave it up to you.

Entry created

http://theseedsite.co.uk/fruits.html
http://www.uky.edu/~garose/BIO.PLS.210.FRUITS.HTM

Most English sources I checked go with "fleshy fruit". Berry is a type of fleshy fruit.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>moist, fleshy fruit (e.g. tomato, grape)</gloss>
-<gloss>berry</gloss>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>fleshy fruit</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>moist, fleshy fruit (i.e. tomato, grape)</gloss>
+<gloss>moist, fleshy fruit (e.g. tomato, grape)</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1209700">乾果</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1209700">乾果・1</xref>

Entry created

Thanks for the comments.
We could have extended discussions on where and how to represent morphology and etymology, but these comments are NOT the appropriate forum. Please feel free to raise an issue in the Github forum if you wish. 
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Issues_Forum

This is strictly morphology that the reader can apply to their use of the language, for example: knowing it is made from ん and what ん derives from allows them to correctly predict the existence of ませぬ - or - if someone learns of ぬ through ません and learns from ぬ's entry its function/meaning and how it is morphologically added to other words, then they would be equipped to locate and understand every single instance of ぬ or ん they find from thereon, as well as to use it themselves. Is this not a benefit for the reader?
This is in line with the editorial policy that lists "where there is a derivational relationship between words that it is useful to highlight, e.g. between かっけー and 格好いい, or between オケる and 空オケ." as a cross-reference that can enhance the value of the entry; this is fundamentally the same as the given examples - and with ぬ being a productive morpheme, morphology notes and references would be even more useful.
Now, I do agree that it is not all etymology and/or morphology that should be added: here there is a positive impact for the learner's understanding and practice. Contrast this with something such as adding "changed over time from まゐらす to まらする, まする, culminating in ます" to the ます entry. The latter would be a truly useless historical etymology that does not help readers to understand what something means, how it comes to mean it, nor how to use it.


I understand that the dictionary is not here to teach morphology, but it is here to teach Japanese and morphology just cannot not be useful in such a highly agglutinative language - in fact, it is not only useful, it is required for its use: it is the necessity of morphology that led you to add "after the -masu stem of a verb" to this very entry, it is morphology that dictates we have separate verb classes and it is morphology that distinguishes verbs from adjectives and tells you how to use each. 
If we are ignoring any mention of etymological and/or morphological information and concern ourselves only with self-contained semantic/functional minimalism, we might as well remove: the left half of the note in this entry along with all 3 cross-references, the cross-reference to 格好いい in かっけー, as well as any other similarly substantiated note or reference in any and all entries. We could even remove the tags for 動詞 and 形容詞 and neatly bundle them under a category for 述語 since that is the all-encompassing superset. Nonetheless, I think you will agree that would make the dictionary less useful as it would lose much of its power to teach usage - which directly affects ability to teach identification and thus, comprehension - and completely lose any information about derivative connections, all because of morphology and etymology.

Do you believe that usage, identification, and relations are not something that a cross-linguistic dictionary should seek to teach? Is it not what the reader seeks to learn? If you do think so, then what does it seek to teach? Raw semantic correspondence? If you give yourself the bother to think about these questions, consider: Every time someone conjugates something, they are engaging with morphology. Every time you add an [adj] tag to something, you are teaching them about it.

Since we're not attempting to explain the etymology.

How would the cross-reference to ん be redundant? As it is, there is no way for one to know that the ん in ません is the negative ぬ・ん from simply looking at this entry.

I agree with Robin on the etymology, etc. The xref to ん is quite redundant.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・3</xref>

I think "non-past" is good to cover present/future. Could add a note about はんかった, but it's probably overkill.

" in the non-past tense" - is this the most succinct wording? 
also, you still use "へん" in the past tense (though you add か
った" i.e. "やらへんかった")

daijs: "［感］相手を見下したり、勝ち誇ったりする気持ちで発する声。「―、どうだ、
まいったか」"

@@ -13,0 +13,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>humph</gloss>
+<gloss>hmph</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -9,3 +9,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>

Entry created

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=focusing+screen%2Cfocussing+screen&year_start=1800&year_end=2009&corpus=6&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cfocusing%20screen%
3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cfocussing%20screen%3B%2Cc0
disappearingly uncommon spelling

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>focussing screen</gloss>

Kagaku

Alternative version

@@ -6,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピントガラス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピント・グラス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピント・ガラス</reb>
@@ -16,0 +25,1 @@
+<gloss>focussing screen</gloss>

I have split off sense 2.

daijs, daijr

2 Should be its own entry, it does not share an origin with the negative helper nor are the meanings similar. Added [aux-adj] to reflect inflection paradigm.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
@@ -12,7 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2008630">忙しない</xref>
-<s_inf>after the root of an adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>emphatic suffix</gloss>

I'll just make it "suf" like sense 2. ません should be the same.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>

is sense 1 aux-v or aux-adj?  do we really need separate tags for these?

should we just simplify by calling them all "aux" and call it a day?

No further discussion.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>used in sentence-final position as an indirect prohibition</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in sentence-final position as an indirect prohibition</s_inf>
+<gloss>don't</gloss>

@@ -10,3 +10,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>

split senses and changed POS

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>

加密列	332
加密爾列	36
カミツレ	42163
カミルレ	339

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Both Koj & Daijr have only カミツレ.

n-grams
カミルレ	13
カミツレ	609
カミツレの花	38
eij only has ツレ
daijs redirects ツレ → ルレ
daijr redirects ルレ → ツレ

the daijs redirect is the odd one of the bunch
anyway, there's an anime character by the name カミツレ that likely twists those n-grams a bit

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<reb>カミルレ</reb>
+<reb>カミツレ</reb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<reb>カミツレ</reb>
+<reb>カミルレ</reb>

this is not how we're handling ateji for foreign words now.  カミルレ is a loanword and takes katakana, 加密列 is an ateji writing of that loanword, and therefore nokanji is inappropriate

@@ -13,6 +13,0 @@
-<reb>かみるれ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かみつれ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -20,1 +14,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -24,1 +17,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

@@ -13,0 +13,6 @@
+<reb>かみるれ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かみつれ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +20,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -17,0 +24,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

Daijr, リーダーズ+プラス

Merging 1026710.

@@ -7,0 +7,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウォンテット</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -9,1 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>wanted</gloss>
+<gloss>wanted (esp. someone sought by police, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>wanted person</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない・わけにはいかない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない</xref>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>impossible to do (although wants to)</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot (due to external circumstances)</gloss>
@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>no way we can</gloss>
+<gloss>impossible to</gloss>
+<gloss>no way one can (do)</gloss>

Suggest aligning the gloss with the expanded 2057580. I think they should stay in step.

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>cannot afford to</gloss>
+<gloss>must not</gloss>
+<gloss>no way we can</gloss>

Pushing Google to its limit I get about 450 non-dictionary hits. Not that common, but I think it's worth keeping with the note.

I think we should ideally only include "incorrect variants" 
that are somewhat common, this one only gets 8,350 hits (on 
bing), compared to 624k for "訳にはいかない." If it's listed in 
a dictionary of incorrect Japanese it might of course be 
worth having, but if it's this book: 
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4883195228/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_STFG
qb1G7621X
then it seems as if it's based on non-native usage.

Drop it. Can this be labelled "dated" now?

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>"Galapagos" cell phone (Japanese brand)</gloss>

"Galapagos" cell phone (Japanese brand)
looks quite questionable to me.

en:WP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_phone

Add briefer gloss “feature phone”, which is the usual English 
term for this category of phones.
ガラケー is specifically Japanese though, so I’ve added 
(Japanese).

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<gloss>(Japanese) feature phone</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

I'll go for having both versions with xrefs. Since 他人 can actually be read "ひと", they could be merged, but I feel  他人の would usually be たにんの.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>ふんどしで相撲を取る</keb>
+<keb>人のふんどしで相撲を取る</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,4 @@
-<keb>褌で相撲を取る</keb>
+<keb>人の褌で相撲を取る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひとのふんどしで相撲を取る</keb>
@@ -11,1 +14,1 @@
-<reb>ふんどしですもうをとる</reb>
+<reb>ひとのふんどしですもうをとる</reb>
@@ -16,1 +19,1 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 人の... or 他人の...</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2790780">他人のふんどしで相撲を取る・たにんのふんどしですもうをとる</xref>

prog has 他人のふんどしで相撲を取る in its entry for 相撲, and that gets a fair number of hits too

all my sources have it as 人のふんどしで相撲を取る, but i could go either way.  doesn't really matter to me.  either we should have an entry for both forms in the ref box above or just the current entry.

Any other views? I wondered initially about putting both 人の... and 他人... versions as they account for 95% of hits, but I saw the Eijiro compiler had ふんどしで相撲をとる〔人の〕
twice, so I thought I could get away with one entry.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<s_inf>often 人の...</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. 人の... or 他人の...</s_inf>

if omit 人の, whole word is meaningless. this should be 他人のふんどしで相撲をとる or 人の褌で相撲を取る.

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヨウスコウカワイルカ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipotes_vexillifer

Trimmed

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,1 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>Yangtze river dolphin</gloss>

wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousa_chinensis
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シナウスイロイルカ

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アマゾンカワイルカ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inia_geoffrensis

wiki

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クロミンククジラ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balaenoptera_bonaerensis

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クロミンククジラ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

ngrams

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニタリクジラ

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニタリクジラ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cephalorhynchus_heavisidii

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サラワクイルカ

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サラワクイルカ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -13,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>Sarawak Dolphin</gloss>
+<gloss>Sarawak dolphin</gloss>

wiki

obvious typo

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>たいせいようかわいるか</reb>
+<reb>たいせいようかまいるか</reb>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

* britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/ハナジロカマイルカ-175366
* jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハナジロカマイルカ

Typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>はなじろかわいるか</reb>
+<reb>はなじろかまいるか</reb>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

* britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/ミナミカマイルカ-175370
* jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミナミカマイルカ

Typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>みなみかわいるか</reb>
+<reb>みなみかまいるか</reb>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

なるほど

wiki

kanji would be: 豪州河巨頭;オーストラリア河巨頭
doesn't seem to be used much (perhaps because it was only described as new species in 2005)

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemisteptia

I think the Japanese Wikip has a spelling mistake.

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Hemistepta lyrata</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>Hemisteptia lyrata</gloss>

wiki

Don't think there's a common name http://eol.org/pages/2895984/names/synonyms

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コウリンカ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijs gg5

no common name that I can find

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki

n-grams
目の届く所	104
目の届くところ	382

I thought I already fixed all the ところ entries

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目の届くところに</keb>
+</k_ele>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/目の届く所に  Eijiro, リーダーズ+プラス

600k hits (800k without the に). Useful expression. Also 目の届かない所に.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>place out of sight</gloss>
-<gloss>somewhere out of eyeshot</gloss>
+<gloss>(place) out of sight</gloss>
+<gloss>(somewhere) out of eyeshot</gloss>

@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>out of sight</gloss>
-<gloss>out of eyeshot</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>place out of sight</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhere out of eyeshot</gloss>

OK

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>目の届かないところに</keb>
+<keb>目の届かないところ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>目の届かない所に</keb>
+<keb>目の届かない所</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>めのとどかないところに</reb>
+<reb>めのとどかないところ</reb>

目の届かないところ	11239	  
目の届かないところで	6339	  
目の届かないところに	2622	  
目の届かないところへ	456	  
目の届かないところを	423	  
目の届かないところまで	266	  
目の届かないところが	151	  
目の届かないところから	113	  
目の届かないところも	111	  
目の届かないところの	101	  
目の届かないところは	89

Should drop に
(in line w our 手の届かないところ entry)

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピント・ビーン</reb>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ピントビーン  
http://item.rakuten.co.jp/tamaki-web/10005980/  
http://www.amazon.co.jp/エルボラーチョ-うずら豆-ピントビーンズ/dp/B0030BRTP0

https://www.msdmanuals.com/ja-jp/プロフェッショナル/19-小児科/乳幼児および小児におけるその他の疾患/発育不良-failure-to-thrive［ftt］

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>stunting</gloss>
+<gloss>failure to thrive</gloss>

GG5, Eijiro, Igaku

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>poor development</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>decreased growth</gloss>
+<gloss>stunting</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/発育不良  
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/je/発育/m3u/  
http://meddic.jp/発育不良

daijr "現代でも主に関西地方で用いる"
daijs "関西・四国地方などで"
nikk "「あない」だけで副詞的にも用いられる"

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,1 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -18,1 +19,1 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>off the record instructions</gloss>

daijs

not 100% happy with my definition for the 2nd sense

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>ruden</gloss>
+<gloss>rude</gloss>

礼儀知らずの	4623
礼儀知らずな	5713

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,4 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>rudeness</gloss>
-<gloss>impoliteness</gloss>
-<gloss>mannerlessness</gloss>
-<gloss>snottiness</gloss>
+<gloss>ruden</gloss>
+<gloss>impolite</gloss>
+<gloss>mannerless</gloss>
+<gloss>snotty</gloss>

Eijiro, Daijr, リーダーズ+プラス

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>mannerlessness</gloss>
+<gloss>snottiness</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/礼儀知らず  
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?dtype=3&dname=2ss&index=264530

jitsuyo

年を重ねる	105407
歳を重ねる	68351

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歳を重ねる</keb>

Eijiro

「年を重ねる」っていうこと？･･･（グループ活動） 
(1)「わたしが考える高齢期」について、グループで意見を交流してみよう！ ...

http://www.kochinet.ed.jp/center/jinken/information_packet/3-1.pdf

GG5, リーダーズ+プラス

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>scab</gloss>

http://en.bab.la/dictionary/english-japanese/swelling  
http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/腫れ  
http://kotobank.jp/word/膨れ

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

heard in a music video on NHK1's みんなのうた
http://monjiro.net/dic/rank/34/153174/0
http://wiki.livedoor.jp/s2healing/d/�Ф��ʤ�

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daijr/s, nikk, ALC, Luminous, JWN

OK.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>do not judge a book by its cover</gloss>
+<gloss>don't judge a book by its cover</gloss>

I think "don't" is better here. Definitely more common.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>don't judge a book by its cover</gloss>
+<gloss>do not judge a book by its cover</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<gloss>you can't judge a book by its cover</gloss>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<gloss>don't judge a book by its cover</gloss>

I see a few hits for やちょくどり, but I think it's people guessing the reading.

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨタダドリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

nikk
4k hits

We don't include the scientific name on rare,arch,poet alternative names for species, usually.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>lesser cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus)</gloss>
+<gloss>lesser cuckoo</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1444570">時鳥</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1444570">ホトトギス</xref>

* nikk
* jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ホトトギス#別名

Typo.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>オヤナシドリ</reb>
+<reb>アヤナシドリ</reb>

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オヤナシドリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

nikk
425 (kana) + 6 hits

万葉集 quote - that's really "arch".

daijr/s

Eijiro: "好ましからざる {形} : unwanted"

Seen with 者/もの, 分子, etc. See discussion on 2140310

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/mb/ウォンツ（欲求）/m0u/

daijs 情報・知識imidas
http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/742/742604/

"一方のauの田中孝司社長は、「この秋冬モデルの段階で、Windows Phone 8をポー
トフォリオの中に入れるのは困難になった。auは、お客様の“ウォンツ”に応えることを基本
にしている。もう少し時間がほしい」とした。"

daijs nipp wiki

GG5, 新和英中辞典,ルミナス

GG5, Lawdic

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス

新和英中辞典, リーダーズ+プラス

eij, eprog
used in one daijs entry:
アペール【Nicolas Appert】
［1749～1841］フランスのコック長・製菓業者。缶詰の発明者。固形ブイヨン・ゼラチンの
製法なども発明。

GG5, ルミナス

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>Numidian crane</gloss>

daijr/s
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アネハヅル

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daijr, Gg5, ルミナス, JWN

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス

GG5, Lawdic, Eijiro, Igaku

Koj, Daijr, GG5, Eijiro, Patent gloss.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_judicata

No idea.

not sure if it has the same legal usage, but this reading from koj, daijs, nikk seems to have the same meaning or at least a very similar one

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きょうしゅ</reb>

Koj, Daijr, GG5

Eijiro, 新和英中辞典, GG5

新和英中辞典, GG5, Eijiro, ビジネス英和辞典

Lawdic, GG5, Eijiro