daijr

Not a noun.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

477k (b)
(actually more than -チック version (ca 300k))

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エロティック</reb>

GG5, ルミナス, etc.

I agree about the gloss, and the note.

@@ -27,3 +27,1 @@
-<s_inf>leading to 大吉, 中吉, 小吉, 吉, 末吉, 凶 or 大凶</s_inf>
-<gloss>written oracle</gloss>
-<gloss>fortune slip</gloss>
+<gloss>fortune slip (usu. bought at a shrine)</gloss>

also, is the note very helpful? unless you know what 大吉 etc. 
is, it seems like it would just needlessly confuse

is "written oracle" a good translation? don't get many hits 
for it on google. might "paper fortune" be better?

GG2

@@ -29,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>fortune slip</gloss>

prog
  彼のバイオリンの音を聞くと歯が浮く｜The sound of his violin sets my teeth on edge .
  彼は歯の浮くような文章の手紙をよこした｜He sent me a letter written in an irritatingly affected style.
  歯の浮くようなお世辞はやめてくれ｜((口)) Don't lay it on so thick.

collins
  If you say that something sets your teeth on edge, you mean that you find it extremely unpleasant or irritating.

〈齒／歯／は／ハ〉が〈浮／う〉く

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 歯が浮く │ 8,198 │ 97.8% │
│ 歯がうく │   164 │  2.0% │
│ はがうく │    24 │  0.3% │
├─ーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 歯が浮い │ 5,188 │ 95.0% │
│ 歯がうい │   252 │  4.6% │
│ はが浮い │    22 │  0.4% │
│ はがうい │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Maybe something like this

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to become annoyed</gloss>

GG5 浮く - Sense 3: 〔歯が〕 be on edge; feel loose.

Not sure either is a metaphor. The kokugos don't seem to have these in the same sense of 浮く.
I suspect the use of 気障 (きざ) is just indicating what puts one's teeth on edge.

https://www.jlogos.com/d004/5351237.html

I must point out that this entry is very confusing to a non-native speaker of English, because it is not clear which of these tooth-related glosses is a metaphor and which is literal. Would there be a non-tooth-related gloss available somewhere?

Also worth pointing out that there is the word きざ appearing in most Japanese definitions which is not apparent in this entry.

that's the only sense in gg5, so making the switch

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>to get loose teeth</gloss>
+<gloss>to have one's teeth set on edge</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>to have one's teeth set on edge</gloss>
+<gloss>to get loose teeth</gloss>

G n-grams:
歯をくいしばる	2087
歯を食いしばる	10594
歯を食い縛る	787
歯を食縛る	No matches

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>歯をくいしばる</keb>
+<keb>歯を食いしばる</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>歯を食いしばる</keb>
+<keb>歯をくいしばる</keb>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Ordered by hits (in form "はをくいしばって")

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歯をくいしばる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +15,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>歯をくいしばる</keb>

See below.

In the text which I was reading the added entry above was used. The inclusion would help the novice to find the result.

You also have the following:-


歯をくいしばる 【？】 clamp one's teeth shut (together); WI4

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歯をくいしばる</keb>

Not sure it's two senses.

@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

I think that the "equal terms" is coming from the adverbs such as 互角に and 堂々と. If it was implicit in 渡り合う, why would they be added? Both the JEs and kokugos have them.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>

sankoku:
たがいに（対等に）〈切り合う／戦う〉。
daijr:
相手になって争う。応戦する。
「チャンピオンと互角に━・う」
meikyo:
相手になって戦う。
daijs:
相手になって戦う。
「格上のチームと互角に―・う」
obunsha:
刀できりあう。また、激しく競い合う。
「強豪と互角に―」
iwanami:
相手になって切り合う、または争う。激しく論じ合う。
「互角に―」
koujien:
相手になって斬りあう。（強い相手と対等に）戦う。
gg5:
►互角に渡り合う　prove oneself ┏a match [a worthy opponent, no mean foe]
・堂々と渡り合う　compete [vie] fairly and squarely 《with…》

i don't think it's over-interpreting
sankoku and koujien explicitly say that it's fighting on equal terms, most kokugos use "相手になる" which basically means the same thing in this context and generally all dictionaries go out of their way to use "互角に" in examples

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>

That qualification isn't in any of the JEs. I think it's over-interpreting what's in the kokugos.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>

"debate" seems a bit tame here. I think it should go further down.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>to debate</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>to debate</gloss>

Daijr. G n-grams:
様体	25799
容態	110292
容体	32952
容體	65
容躰	59

Merging 1794370 (as in Daijr/s).

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>様体</keb>
@@ -34,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>appearance</gloss>

@@ -33,1 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>condition (usually animate)</gloss>
+<gloss>condition</gloss>
+<gloss>state (of health)</gloss>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<keb>容躰</keb>
+<keb>容體</keb>
@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<keb>容體</keb>
+<keb>容躰</keb>

google

10x the hits for 容體 vs 容躰

@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>容體</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

福智山ろく花公園

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>山ろく</keb>

split into proper glosses

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>foot or base of a mountain</gloss>
+<gloss>foot of a mountain</gloss>
+<gloss>base of a mountain</gloss>

I think it's clearer to split sense 2.

@@ -17 +17,8 @@
-<gloss>base-fare zone</gloss>
+<gloss>base-fare zone (of a train, taxi, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2852904">初乗り運賃</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2852904">初乗り運賃</xref>
+<gloss>base fare</gloss>
+<gloss>minimum fare</gloss>
@@ -19 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>base fare</gloss>

koj, gg5, etc.

i don't think they need to be two different senses

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>first ride</gloss>
+<gloss>first ride (in a new vehicle, in the new year, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>base-fare zone</gloss>
@@ -20,5 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>first ride of the new year</gloss>
-</sense>

"このタクシー、なんと初乗り320円！"
https://twitter.com/waken/status/419119686307938304/photo/1
"初乗りが安い！！"
http://nttbj.itp.ne.jp/0118466000/index.html
daij

@@ -14,0 +15,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>starting fare</gloss>
+<gloss>base fare</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>first ride of the new year</gloss>
+</sense>

Changing gloss with conjunction to separate glosses, per editorial policy.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>silver nugget or ingot</gloss>
+<gloss>silver nugget</gloss>
+<gloss>silver ingot</gloss>

daijr/s
nikk: "敬意をもたない場合に用いる"
斎藤和英大辞典: "うちの者どもは無事です"
ALC: "下僕の者共をよく審問してみたが、しかし誰もそんな旅館を知っているものはなかった。"

Sense 2 doesn't indicate respect, but I'm not sure if it's to the point of deserving [derog] or not.
I was going to give sense 2 [arch], but the 斎藤和英大辞典 and ALC examples are clearly more modern.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>者ども</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>people</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

Proposing a merge with  むずかる.

https://furigana.info/w/憤
いきどお	41.6%
おこ	25.5%
いきどほ	9.8%
いか	6.3%
む	5.2% <--- 憤ッと
いきどほり	3.5%
いきど	1.7%
いきどおり	1.7%
じ	0.9%
いかり	0.4%
むっ	0.4%
おそ	0.4%
むく	0.4%
むつ	0.2%
いき	0.2%
いきどう	0.2%
じれ	0.2%
すね	0.2%
ふん	0.2%
ぷ	0.2%
ぷん	0.2%
むず	0.2%

Somebody stuck the kanji next to this form (once, maybe, in all of history...)
https://ameblo.jp/field-day-jikkouiinn/entry-12787009673.html
「憤る（むずがる）」や、「難しい（むずかしい）」などです。

I see this has been previously discussed.

Recommend doing the merge previously considered, with むずかる being marked as irregular/erroneous/nonstandard in some way.  Extra datapoint: sankoku does not give kanji *at all* for the xref むずかる(and has no entry at all for むずがる). More comments at xref, but in modern Japanese neither むずかる nor もずがる have a kanji form(except maybe in old texts, or as a curiosity). No one should *choose* use use 憤 to write either, unless they are deliberately playing games.

On furigana.info,  憤 is basically never used for this reading. The 0.2% むず at the bottom is someone who wrote 憤かり, which is not a standard orthography anyway.

For the moment marked [col] for lack of anything else.  It's prescriptively an error. here's asahi shinbun telling their readers they're wrong:
http://www.asahi.com/special/kotoba/quiz/SDI201505204648.html

Of course, the fact that such an article exists is a testament to the fact that this *is* a word in practice. Still, I think it could be comfortably merged into the xref, and benefit from one set of notes/xrefs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Could go either way. I'm tempted to merge with むずかる as "nokanji". むずかる has to be "uk".

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2010/10/blog-post_8121.html
Hits:
"憤る（むずかる）" 1.1k
"憤る（むずがる）" 0

Could possibly be combined with むずかる. Though the ref doesn't give the kanji (憤る) as a headword, so I'm not sure if someone would actually write 憤る with the reading むずがる.
Also, this would presumably be [uk] if it were given the kanji, while I'm not sure if むずかる should be [uk] or not (due to 憤る hits for いきどおる confusing things).

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1567450">掏摸・すり</xref>

daijs
"（関西・四国地方などで）" → col

Weblio英語表現辞典, ALC
Google: "ワオー" wow

N-grams

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>真っかっか</keb>

N-grams:
真っ赤っか	1195
真っ赤っ赤	301
まっ赤っ赤	32

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>真っ赤っか</keb>
+</k_ele>

"真っ赤っ赤な嘘" 18 (b) 59 unique (g)
... not a whole lot, but still.

@@ -21,0 +21,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1363250">真っ赤・まっか・2</xref>
+<gloss>downright (e.g. lie)</gloss>
+<gloss>complete</gloss>
+<gloss>utter</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs, nikk
200k + 118k hits

Might also have the same sense 2 as 真っ赤.

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>buddhist temple inside a Shinto shrine</gloss>
+<gloss>Buddhist temple within a Shinto shrine</gloss>

daij, nikk, 国史大辞典

GG5

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>buddhist temple inside a Shinto shrine</gloss>
+<gloss>Buddhist temple within a Shinto shrine</gloss>
+<gloss>temple attached to a shrine</gloss>

wiki, daij, nikk

I don't think so.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>an auspicious occasion!</gloss>

In English dictionaries. (prob don't need the last one)

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger">prosit</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<gloss>prosit</gloss>

daijr/s, nikk, ランダムハウス英語大辞典, 情報・知識imidas