I was about to suggest the same thing. I'll do it.

@@ -10,9 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>斃れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>仆れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>殪れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -35 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -45 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -59 +46,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -68 +54,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -75 +60,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

I think the usual thing to do in this situation is to create a new 斃れる/仆れる/殪れる entry and have an x-ref pointing to this entry's "die" sense.

daij

斃れる, 仆れる and 殪れる all only apply to the "to die" 
sense, one out of seven senses. If they would still 
appear in searches, it'd make sense to just include them 
in a note...
_
Also a reminder that the example sentences will have to 
be adjusted if my split of sense 1 goes through.

@@ -44,0 +45 @@
+<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

gg5 and prog examples

Nobody (at least not daij/kenkyusha) splits like this, 
but 英英 dictionaries usually split "collapse" into two 
senses, e.g. Merriam Webster: https://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/collapse
oxford university press
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/collapse

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>to take a fall</gloss>
@@ -32 +33,10 @@
-<gloss>to tumble</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be destroyed (in a collapse)</gloss>
+<gloss>to collapse</gloss>
+<gloss>to cave in</gloss>
+<gloss>to crumble</gloss>
+<gloss>to give away</gloss>

daijs

Fix kanji order: 斃す is pretty rare.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>敵を斃す</keb>
+<keb>敵を倒す</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>敵を倒す</keb>
+<keb>敵を斃す</keb>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>

We don't usually have x-refs on arch entries.

@@ -22,2 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1440980">転がす・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445770">倒す・たおす・1</xref>

@@ -22,3 +22,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1440980">転がす</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445770">倒す・たおす</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1440980">転がす・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445770">倒す・たおす・1</xref>

Actually, to be formal, 転ける（こける） is modern, and the 
corresponding archaic form is 転く（こく）, but we don’t have 
an entry for that yet.

daijr

* Correct pos 動サ四 (archaic form)
* Link to modern forms
* Link to [vi] form
BTW, the example sentences are over-eagerly matching;
they are actually matches for 倒す（たおす）.

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&v4s;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +22,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1440980">転がす</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445770">倒す・たおす</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

I'd prefer to handle this problem another way. I've changed the way the "glossdic" file is built so that now the ~く adverbial form is added for all the ~い adjectives. Now there's be a:
幅広く from 幅広い [はばひろい] /(adj-i) extensive/wide/broad/(P)/
to match against.

With the entry missing, "Text Glossing" invariably brings up
幅広 【はばひろ】 (adj-na,n,adj-no) wide width (e.g. cloth)...

One xref is enough.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる</xref>
@@ -24,5 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
@@ -30,5 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
@@ -36,5 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・4</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・5</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・6</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445790">たおれる・1</xref>

daijr koj

Saw 斃る on a poster (with furigana).
I’ve given a v. brief gloss, as it’s just an archaic version.

I’ve added the alt. kanji 仆る and 殪る (not in refs for たおる 
but in たおれる) as they do appear at the frequencies you’d 
expect (given frequencies for たおれる).

Yes, GG5's "joint shoulders" is a bit weird.

GG5 gives:
組む[3]
肩を組む　joint shoulders
肩
・肩を組む　place an arm across each other's shoulders
・肩を組んで歩く　walk with arms on each other's [one 
another's] shoulders

Adding b/c idiomatic and pretty confusing in English (we 
don’t have a corresponding short idiom).
I saw this in a context that suggested it as [vt], in sense 
“put one’s arm around another shoulder”, but this might be 
pushing it.

(It was on “list of forbidden activities” in a lounge, and 
as with the “no dancing” sign was observed more oft in the 
breach. And people complain that there is no irony in 
Japan.)

GG5

@@ -9,3 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>despite (one's) appearance</gloss>
-<gloss>there</gloss>
-<gloss>with that</gloss>
+<gloss>despite appearances</gloss>
+<gloss>you mightn't think so, however ...</gloss>

See below.

You have the following on the site:-

これで (exp) here; with this; (P)

Maybe you would consider including the above submission.

If you do promote the above, then maybe you will also promote "あれでも despite everything; even so; for all that; WI1" because you also have the following:-

これでも (exp) even though things may appear this way