G n-grams

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Agree.

meikyo, daijr, daijs

common enough as both adj and adv that i think we should follow the kokugos in their sense splitting

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>各別</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +19,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かくべち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +24,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,1 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -20,1 +27,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<gloss>particular</gloss>
+<gloss>special</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +30,6 @@
-<gloss>special</gloss>
-<gloss>particular</gloss>
+<gloss>especial</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>particularly</gloss>
+<gloss>especially</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>especially</gloss>
-<gloss>particularly</gloss>

Genius WaEi has "specially; especially; particular; special; exceptional", while 
Shogakukan has "particularl(ly); especial(ly); exceptional(ly)

@@ -22,0 +22,5 @@
+<gloss>special</gloss>
+<gloss>particular</gloss>
+<gloss>exceptionally</gloss>
+<gloss>especially</gloss>
+<gloss>particularly</gloss>

eij

usually used prenominally, but also adj-no

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>necessity</gloss>
+<gloss>necessary</gloss>

None

If it's a noun, then the nominal form ought to be used here. 
If it's an adjective, then label it as such (such as na- or 
no-adjective, or adjectival suffix, etc.)

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>necessary</gloss>
+<gloss>necessity</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典, ルミナス, Daijirin

It seems it can go both ways. A sense split seems the best.

@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>guy</gloss>
+<gloss>fellow</gloss>
+<gloss>chap</gloss>
+<gloss>buddy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +28,1 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

I wonder if "bastard; asshole; arsehole; son of a bitch" may be too strong. This word appears in Harry Potter translation and I'm told it's closer to "guy(s)".

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>arsehole</gloss>

プログレッシブ和英中辞典, daijr, eij
male pronoun (he)

rascal seems a bit weak compared to other wa-ei's

@@ -18,1 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>rascal</gloss>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>bastard</gloss>
+<gloss>asshole</gloss>
+<gloss>son of a bitch</gloss>

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>

GG5, 中辞典, ルミナス, Daijirin

It seems it can go both ways. A sense split seems the best.

@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>guy</gloss>
+<gloss>fellow</gloss>
+<gloss>chap</gloss>
+<gloss>buddy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +28,1 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

I wonder if "bastard; asshole; arsehole; son of a bitch" may be too strong. This word appears in Harry Potter translation and I'm told it's closer to "guy(s)".

lighted -> lightly

@@ -39 +39 @@
-<gloss>deep-frying food lighted coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>
+<gloss>deep-frying food lightly coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>

I think we should mention it.
Refers to the technique as well as the food.

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>deep-frying food lighted coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>

唐揚げ	939116	44.1%
から揚げ	681119	32.0%
唐揚	143321	6.7% daijs says 「唐揚げ」の字も当てることがある。
空揚げ	21679	1.0% rK
カラ揚げ	3885	0.2% sK
空揚	1678	0.1% rK
からあげ	308802	14.5%
カラあげ	264	0.0% remove
カラアゲ	28644	1.3% remove

meikyo and daijs say coated in flour or starch,
daijr says 何もつけないで，または小麦粉やかたくり粉を軽くまぶして油で揚げること
we could mention it but it might be messy. but KFC chicken wouldn't be called 唐揚げ

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>空揚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,3 +27 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>空揚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,5 +30,0 @@
-<re_restr>唐揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>から揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>唐揚</re_restr>
-<re_restr>空揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>空揚</re_restr>
@@ -33,8 +32,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カラあげ</reb>
-<re_restr>カラ揚げ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カラアゲ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -44,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

〈打（ち）／うち／ウチ〉〈出／で／デ〉の〈小／こ／コ〉〈槌／づち／ヅチ／ずち〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 打ち出の小槌　 │ 26,015 │ 46.0% │
│ 打出の小槌　　 │ 16,096 │ 28.5% │
│ うちでの小槌　 │  2,981 │  5.3% │ - add, sK
│ 打ち出の小づち │  1,844 │  3.3% │
│ 打ちでの小槌　 │    867 │  1.5% │ - add, sK
│ 打出の小づち　 │    608 │  1.1% │ - add, sK
│ 打ち出のコヅチ │    537 │  1.0% │
│ うちでの小づち │    313 │  0.6% │
│ 打ち出のこづち │    236 │  0.4% │
│ 打出のこづち　 │    221 │  0.4% │
│ 打ちでの小づち │     54 │  0.1% │
│ 打ちでのこずち │     25 │  0.0% │
│ 打ち出のこずち │     23 │  0.0% │
│ 打ちでのこづち │     22 │  0.0% │
│ うちでのこづち │  6,169 │ 10.9% │
│ うちでのこずち │    496 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<keb>打出の小槌</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うちでの小槌</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12 +19,6 @@
-<keb>打出の小槌</keb>
+<keb>打ちでの小槌</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打出の小づち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

打出の小槌	16096

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

打ち出の小づち	1844	6.6%
打ち出の小槌	26015	93.4%
打ち出の小鎚	0	0.0%

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>打ち出の小づち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Happy to leave it as "ik". ルミナス has チンゲンさい but my other refs all say チンゲンサイ.

although technically チンゲンさい can't come from qīnggěngcài, so if it's not [ik], it should be given its own entry

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

reopen

koj, daij, wiki

matching entry for 2834152

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834152">白菜・パクチョイ</xref>
@@ -20 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>bok-choy (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)</gloss>
+<gloss>bok choy (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis; esp. cultivars with green stalks)</gloss>
+<gloss>pak choi</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>bok choi</gloss>
-<gloss>pak choi</gloss>

as does shinmeikai

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

i'll accept this version for now.  not sure the note is needed

It appears that it is also used in the sense that I submitted, although whether that is regarded as incorrect usage is another matter, I suppose: 
食べ応えがある、というのは、質量共に満足感を得られるという意味になると思います。しかし本来の意味ではなく、噛み応えがある、のようなマイナスのニュアンスを和らげて相手に伝える場合にもこの言葉を使う事もあると思います。
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1487449399
.
It seems to be about food texture here, too, rather than substantiality:
この食感！食べ応え…いえ噛み応え十分です [...] 食感は外枠が堅く、中の網目状部分はそれより少し堅さ控えめ、実際堅さは同じでしょうけど構造の違いから、違う堅さに感じますがザクッザクッとしていて1つ1つが十分に食べ応えがあります。
http://tinyurl.com/lw8owd2
But I don't mind if you reject it as being erroneous usage.

GG5 says it's a synonym of  食べで, and has: "食べごたえがある substantial 《meal》; filling; satisfactory". Similar passages in Eijiro.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>食べごたえ</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>firm, springy mouthfeel</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2803600">食べで・たべで</xref>
+<s_inf>often 食べごたえ(が|の)ある</s_inf>
+<gloss>substantiality (of a meal)</gloss>
+<gloss>fillingness</gloss>
+<gloss>solidity</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>firm springy mouthfeel</gloss>
+<gloss>firm, springy mouthfeel</gloss>

エビチリのエビが凄く大きい！食べ応えがあります。
(from a very positive restaurant review)

Good book.

daijr koj
“Japanese Cuisine: A Simple Art” by Tsuji (p. 220 and 382)

Saw on menu; checked in standard cookbook for exact 
description and translation.
It’s definitely *simmered* rather than *boiled*: the point is 
esp. to flavor with broth.
たらの揚げ煮 is translated as “Fried cod in broth”

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro, ngrams (7141)

Mainly in compounds like プリペイド, ペイドパブリシティ, etc.

Moved to Enamdict.

https://www.paypal.jp/jp/home/

GG5, 中辞典, ルミナス, Daijr