Doesn't refer to the sound itself.

@@ -42,3 +42 @@
-<gloss>maru mark</gloss>
-<gloss>semivoiced sound</gloss>
-<gloss>p-sound</gloss>
+<gloss>handakuten (diacritic)</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/○#Symbol_2

For sense 3, it's used as a symbol, not a noun. Sense 2 can be a noun (e.g. テストで〇をもらう).

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>circle (sometimes used for zero)</gloss>
+<s_inf>sometimes used for zero</s_inf>
+<gloss>circle</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +21,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1944660">二重丸・にじゅうまる</xref>
-<gloss>correct (when marking)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1944660">二重丸</xref>
+<s_inf>when marking a test, homework, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>"correct"</gloss>
+<gloss>"good"</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +27,5 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2146000">〇〇・まるまる・1</xref>
-<gloss>symbol used as a placeholder (either because a number of other words could be used in that position, or because of censorship)</gloss>
+<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2146000">〇〇・1</xref>
+<s_inf>placeholder used to censor individual characters or indicate a space to be filled in</s_inf>
+<gloss>*</gloss>
+<gloss>_</gloss>

Should it use double quotes instead of single quotes, though?

No response - I'll reject it.

None.

Any references for the kanji form? It is in no dictionary I can access, and gets 0 WWW hits.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>怪立たましい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>wild</gloss>
+<gloss>wild 飼鳥類は極めて物凄く驚き易く、且つ驚けば怪立たましくなるもの。 Yard birds are easily startles and moreover once spooked raise quite a racket.</gloss>

ちょこちょこ	1340566
チョコチョコ	256049

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チョコチョコ</reb>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +19,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +27,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +34,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Reopening.

daij, 新和英中辞典, prog

Temporarily approving to change xref from ちょこまか.

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -12,3 +12,23 @@
-<gloss>hobbling</gloss>
-<gloss>restless</gloss>
-<gloss>easily accomplished</gloss>
+<gloss>with small, quick steps</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>restlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>in continuous motion</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>quickly and easily</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>often</gloss>
+<gloss>frequently</gloss>
+<gloss>now and then</gloss>
+<gloss>occasionally</gloss>

Koj, Daijr

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Ikon</lsource>

I'm used to them being just "franks".

フランクフルター	        1,834		
フランクフルトソーセージ	4,116

Not in the kokugos.

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1111530">フランクフルトソーセージ</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -10 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>frank</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<gloss>frank</gloss>

フランクフルター	        1,834		
フランクフルトソーセージ	4,116

Dropping x-ref. Of my refs, only GG5 has フランクフルター.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1111500">フランクフルター</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1111500">フランクフルター</xref>

Daijr, GG5, JWN, etc.

Daijr has that Ger/wasei, but I'd simplify it to being all wasei.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フランクフルト・ソーセージ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1111500">フランクフルター</xref>
@@ -13,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>frank</gloss>

daij

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger" ls_wasei="y">Frankfurt</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">sausage</lsource>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from somebody</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from someone</gloss>

Looks good.

The note on sense 01 is more of an explanatory gloss than a note.
I think sense 01 is overloaded with meaning and should be split. There's a set phrase / everyday greeting sense (こんにちは) and there's a sense of deliberately messaging / going to visit someone on some special occasion. 
sankoku: ③礼儀を示すために、相手をたずねること。「先生のお宅に結婚の━に行く」
I've added a new "courtesy visit" sense as sense 04. We currently only have sentences indexed to 01, 02, and 03. 

Other edits
* Dropping [adj-no] PoS tags.
* Adding [vi] PoS tags.
* Changing [sl] to [col] on sense 04 (sankoku, meikyo, gg5 have this sense)
* Changing [exp] PoS tag on sense 06 to [n] and adding [arch] tag (smaller kokugos don't have this sense, and we have 一挨一拶 tagged as archaic).

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<s_inf>polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from somebody</s_inf>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24 @@
-<gloss>condolences</gloss>
-<gloss>congratulations</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from somebody</gloss>
@@ -31 +29 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -38 +36 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -45,2 +43,8 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>courtesy visit (to offer condolences, say congratulations, pay respect, introduce oneself, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -57 +61 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -58,0 +63 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Sense 2 is not showing up in references as something distinct. I feel it's really just a broadening of sense 1. I think it would be better handled that way (which also brings the examples back into line.)

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from somebody</s_inf>
@@ -24,7 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>polite set phrase used when meeting or parting from somebody</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>polite set phrase used to express apology, sympathy, congratulations, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>condolences</gloss>
+<gloss>congratulations</gloss>

i think i'm okay with keeping them separate, but sense 2 should have actual translations...  once those are added, the two senses will look rather different and justifiably kept apart.  and the "polite set phrase..." glosses should maybe be notes?

GG5 daijr koj

Split into senses, elab “tranquil” a bit
Actually saw (as shop name) written as 欒, which is a legit reading, but I suspect this rather irregular as a spelling of this word. Will update if I see it used as such in running text.

@@ -14,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>contentedly at ease</gloss>

there are far too many restrictions here for these readings to be merged.  split

@@ -21,8 +21,0 @@
-<reb>まし</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ましら</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -38,1 +30,1 @@
-<gloss>primate (except humans)</gloss>
+<gloss>non-human primate</gloss>
@@ -41,1 +33,0 @@
-<stagr>さる</stagr>
@@ -47,1 +38,0 @@
-<stagr>さる</stagr>
@@ -54,1 +44,0 @@
-<stagr>さる</stagr>
@@ -59,1 +48,0 @@
-<stagr>さる</stagr>
@@ -65,1 +53,0 @@
-<stagr>さる</stagr>

@@ -67,1 +67,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1774230">湯女</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1774230">湯女・2</xref>

daijs/daijr/nikk/動物名辞典 say "all primates except humans," 
i.e. apes as well as monkeys
new kanji:
動物名辞典 
漢字辞典 ("訓読み：さる")
猿女 entry in daij (猿女/猨女)

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>猨</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +28,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サル</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -26,0 +34,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1643040">ニホンザル</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -27,0 +37,2 @@
+<gloss>ape</gloss>
+<gloss>primate (except humans)</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +45,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>さる</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>idiot</gloss>
+<gloss>hick</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

我が方 leads 11:1.
Use "lr=lang_ja" in your Google search URL, or add a の.

GG5 daijr koj

Add spelling 我が方 – all dicts give this
(Can’t easily tell frequency online, since also used in Chinese AFAICT; place this first, due to dicts.)
(Heard on TV today, subtitled as 我が方)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>我が方</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5, luminous, wisdom, meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>operation</gloss>
@@ -27 +29 @@
-<gloss>movie (esp. during the silent movie period)</gloss>
+<gloss>moving picture</gloss>

Yes, I kept looking at it, and feeling tired. Let's let it go now.

GG5 splits "activity" into 1) "然や生物が生き生きと動くこと"  and 2) "組織や人がある目的を持って活発に働くこと
daij and nikk don't split like this but instead have a pretty simple sense 1:
"①  活発に動いたり、働いたりすること。 「さかんに－する火山」 「夜間－する動物」 「組合－」"
"１ 活発に動くこと。ある動きや働きをすること。「暖かくなって虫が活動し始めた」「活動範囲が広い」「火山活動」"
"① (━する) はたらき動くこと。活発に行動すること。

This was trickier than I thought. The GG5 sense split is maybe not all that helpful. The words listed are for the better 
part the same in both senses. I don't know if the extra info I added is really helpful, but it's an attempt to give the 
definition a little more context.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>activity (of a person, organization, animal, volcano, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>activity</gloss>

https://jisho.org/forum/5cce8fab12a53748dc0000c5-huh
"huh
how does this work in a sentence, what is its role? Why is is relevant?"

This entry could probably be improved a lot with the help of GG5 (which has 3 senses)

koj, daij, meikyo, prog, nc, gg5

predominantly adj-t now

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +15,6 @@
+<gloss>vast</gloss>
+<gloss>boundless</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -13,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>vast</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog

I don't think any of these senses are suffixes.
Although it's in GG5, I think the "hiding place" sense is archaic/obsolete. It's not in the other JEs or meikyo/shinmeikai (or even daijs). Daijr's example is from the Meiji era.
I don't think the "underbelly" sense is needed. The kokugos describe it as a "江戸後期の流行語".

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1856910">穴が開く</xref>
@@ -24,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>orifice</gloss>
@@ -31 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>hole (in the ground, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cavity</gloss>
+<gloss>hole (e.g. in the ground)</gloss>
@@ -45 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>missing person (in a team, meeting, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(financial) hole</gloss>
+<gloss>loss</gloss>
@@ -48,0 +50 @@
+<gloss>gap (left by a missing employee, team member, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -57 +58,0 @@
-<gloss>weakness</gloss>
@@ -58,0 +60,2 @@
+<gloss>hole (in a theory, plan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>loophole</gloss>
@@ -62 +64,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -64 +66,2 @@
-<gloss>well-kept secret place</gloss>
+<gloss>good place not many people know about</gloss>
+<gloss>well-kept secret</gloss>
@@ -68 +70,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -69,0 +72,2 @@
+<gloss>long shot</gloss>
+<gloss>dark horse</gloss>
@@ -73,4 +77,3 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1507660">平土間</xref>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>pit (of a theater)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1346290">枡・2</xref>
+<s_inf>theatre jargon</s_inf>
+<gloss>(partitioned) box (type of floor seating in a traditional Japanese theatre)</gloss>
@@ -79,0 +83 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -82,6 +85,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>underbelly (of society, etc.)</gloss>

GG5: 8 〔欠点〕 a fault; a flaw; a weak spot; 〔欠陥〕 a defect; 〔盲点〕 a blind point.

Looks like the same as sense 6, and I see GG5 has just the one sense,

@@ -55,3 +55,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fault</gloss>
+<gloss>defect</gloss>

daijs 3-u

@@ -54 +53,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -55,0 +55,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>weakness</gloss>
+<gloss>weak point</gloss>

This was extensively discussed in 2012 within entry  2159590 (針孔/めど). I didn't want 穴 going in there.
Probably the best thing is to have a separate 穴/めど entry and be done with it. I'll propose that and drop it here.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<s_inf>gen. 穴; 孔 used esp. for (small) perforations; also read めど for this sense</s_inf>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>to be moved</gloss>
+<gloss>to move</gloss>

Maybe "col"?

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to be moved</gloss>

https://mainichi-kotoba.jp/enq-233

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to resonate emotionally</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to stick into (something with a sharp point)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stick into (of something with a sharp point)</gloss>

Meikyo and sankoku have sense 1 as transitive only.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Sense 2 is always preceded by お.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>interference</gloss>
@@ -29 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>to visit (somebody's home)</gloss>
+<s_inf>as お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>to visit (someone's home)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

meikyo only has with this meaning, as does gg5. fine for now, i think

Koj, Daijr, GG5

Ah good, the news2, etc. came back.
GG5 simply says とのい means the same as しゅくちょく. Koj/Daijr have it with a heap of old meanings involving nobles, etc. supported by quotes from the 万葉集, etc. I think I'll leave to someone else.

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とのい</reb>
+</r_ele>

Quiet. Closing.

I'll lock in Robin's note, approve to shorten the queue, and reopen for a while in case there's more discussion.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>blunt outside of compounds; 女性 or 女の人 are preferable</s_inf>
+<s_inf>less polite than 女性 or 女の人</s_inf>

The entry is not just for standalone 女 as the first sense has the n-pref PoS as well.

I don't think so. Some おんな compounds do sound "blunt", and it goes without saying that the note doesn't apply to terms like 女坂.
This entry is for the standalone word 女/おんな. I don't think we need to complicate things by mentioning compounds.

gg5, prog

More glosses.
I think 食べ尽くす is a better example.
We're no longer using aux-v for "動詞の連用形に付いて" senses as they're not strictly auxiliary verbs.

@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to use up</gloss>
@@ -26 +28 @@
-<gloss>to run out</gloss>
+<gloss>to run out of</gloss>
@@ -30,3 +32,5 @@
-<gloss>to devote</gloss>
-<gloss>to serve (a person)</gloss>
-<gloss>to befriend</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to devote oneself (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to do one's utmost (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>to serve</gloss>
+<gloss>to work (for a cause)</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +39,4 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157280">し尽くす</xref>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1891870">食べ尽くす</xref>
+<s_inf>after masu stem of verb</s_inf>
@@ -37,0 +44,2 @@
+<gloss>to do completely</gloss>
+<gloss>to do fully</gloss>

し尽くす too.

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1157280">し尽くす</xref>

やり尽くす is an example

Are there any examples of this verb being used as an auxiliary? I feel that the first and third definition could potentially be merged, judging 
from the example sentences in GG5.

Koj

My "kanwa alert" came on, but I see Koj has it.

nikk

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せい</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -23,1 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1344930">女・おんな</xref>
@@ -26,0 +25,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1344930">女・おんな</xref>

prog, nc, gg5

おっこ may only apply to sense 1

@@ -22,0 +22,3 @@
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344930">女・おんな</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344930">女・おんな</xref>
@@ -23,1 +26,21 @@
-<gloss>boy</gloss>
+<gloss>male</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fellow</gloss>
+<gloss>guy</gloss>
+<gloss>chap</gloss>
+<gloss>bloke</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>male lover</gloss>
+<gloss>boyfriend</gloss>
+<gloss>man</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>manliness</gloss>
+<gloss>manly honor</gloss>
+<gloss>manly honour</gloss>
+<gloss>manly reputation</gloss>

nikk

like 女, this has a lot of meanings in daijs/daijr, 9-12 
glosses

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おっこ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>boy</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1600020">値上がり</xref>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>a fall in price</gloss>
+<gloss>fall in price</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

[vs]
(Saw used as する today)

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

perhaps a bit splittist

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>倒れ掛る</keb>

daij

both daijs and daijr have 2 glosses.

@@ -14,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>to fall onto something and lean against it</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to be about to fall</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to fall</gloss>

1) I'm not so sure about "to be on the point of collapse", which is listed as another 
gloss for the same sense as "to topple over and lean at a precarious angle". 
2) The way I read the definitions (confirmed, it seems to me, by examples and Google 
Images) it means:
"to fall over, but get caught part of the way over, so that it's inclining, not 
completely collapsed to the ground, and possibly leaning *against* something (e.g. 
another object or a person) which has broken its fall, so that it still has further 
to fall and may therefore be somewhat unstable"
3) That's expressing it verbosely, but very explicitly, of course. I tried to capture 
this idea more concisely with my submission "to topple over and lean at a precarious 
angle, in danger of further collapse". I think it's supported by the def's I quoted:
I. 
倒れてもたれかかる。また、倒れそうになる。
[Perhaps you read this one as two different senses, rather than as two parts of the 
one sense?]
and
II.
a)倒れて物にもたれかかる。「植木が垣根に―・っていた」
b)倒れはじめる。また、今にも倒れそうである。「―・った電柱」
[In both a and b the thing has fallen over, but has further to go. In neither case 
does it mean simply "to be on the point of collapse". In a, the plant has fallen over 
and got caught on a fence. In b, the telephone pole is leaning over precariously, and 
may fall further.]
4) In summary, I think "to be on the point of collapse" only captures the *second* 
part of the definition of 倒れ掛かる -- the part that says [また、]倒れそうになる or [また、今
にも]倒れそうである -- and misses the first part: 倒れてもたれかかる or 倒れはじめる.

Daijr, GG5

I agree about the debt.

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to topple over and lean at a precarious angle, in danger of further collapse</gloss>
+<gloss>to topple over and lean at a precarious angle</gloss>
+<gloss>to be on the point of collapse</gloss>

Only 8 Google results for ["倒れかか" 債], and there is very little in those 
results to support the "weighed down by debt" meaning. Also, I don't see 
that sense in my dictionaries. It *does* make sense as a metaphor. However, 
it would probably be pretty obvious in context, given the literal meaning 
of 倒れ掛かる.

So -- consider deleting the "weighed down by debt" sense?

Results from clicking [S]
たおれ‐かか・る【倒れ掛（か）る】
［動ラ五（四）］	
１ 倒れて物にもたれかかる。「植木が垣根に―・っていた」	
２ 倒れはじめる。また、今にも倒れそうである。「―・った電柱」

貧血で彼女は私に倒れかかってきたShe had an attack of anemia and fell against me.

@@ -15,5 +15,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to be weighed down by debt</gloss>
-</sense>

THere seems to be a couple of sizes commonly associated with "hansetsu", but on the other hand there's quite a few of them

@@ -26,0 +27,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>half-size paper</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daij, meikyo, jaanus

approve and reopen so 半折 is not lost

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>半折</keb>
+<keb>半截</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<keb>半截</keb>
+<keb>半折</keb>
@@ -19,1 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>cutting in half (esp. cutting paper in half)</gloss>
+<gloss>cutting in half</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. 半折</s_inf>
+<gloss>painting or calligraphy done on a half-sized piece of paper</gloss>

merge with 1479580

koj, daij, meikyo, prog, nc, gg5

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>to long for</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>to love dearly</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to love dearly</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +29,1 @@
-<gloss>to follow around (e.g. one's mother)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be attached to</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (someone)</gloss>
@@ -34,1 +34,1 @@
-<gloss>to idolize (esp. for virtue, learning)</gloss>
+<gloss>to idolize (for virtue, learning, status, etc.)</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

More senses and glosses.
(Seen a few times, e.g. on sign the other day.)

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>to pine for</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to follow around (e.g. one's mother)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be attached to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to idolize (esp. for virtue, learning)</gloss>
+</sense>

google

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目かくし</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 囁く　　 │ 137,589 │ 48.3% │
│ 私語く　 │      52 │  0.0% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ ささやく │ 147,241 │ 51.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>私語く</keb>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +22,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. in the passive voice</s_inf>
+<gloss>to rumor</gloss>
+<gloss>to rumour</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニホンザル</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Japanese monkey</gloss>
-<gloss>Japanese macaque</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata)</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>lachrymal or tear gland</gloss>
+<gloss>tear gland</gloss>
+<gloss>lacrimal gland</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Looks good.

split out based on things like PoS (only 私語 is vs) and [uk], [gikun], etc.

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>囁き</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,1 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>私語</re_restr>
@@ -17,28 +13,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ささやき</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ささめ</reb>
-<re_restr>私語</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ささめき</reb>
-<re_restr>私語</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ささめきごと</reb>
-<re_restr>私語</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ささめごと</reb>
-<re_restr>私語</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>つつやき</reb>
-<re_restr>囁き</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daijs also has 囁き言 for ささやきごと
(and nikk has ささやいごと)

Koj has all those extra readings for 私語 too.
It's all got very messy. Probably 私語 and 囁き should split.
Just to complicate further, the Kodansha GJD has:
- ささめく as a reading for 囁
- ささやく also written 私語く

OK. Sentence added.

We don't have an example sentence. I'm opening this as a reminder to add one.

I think it's worth mentioning that it's used in a particular context. Maybe the examples aren't needed.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>as ご笑覧ください, ご笑覧いただければ幸い, etc.; used when asking someone to read something one has written</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used when asking someone to read something one has written</s_inf>

With the improved gloss, is the note really necessary?

薄め	860096	91.8%
薄目	74939	8.0%
うす目	1701	0.2%

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うす目</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, luminous, wisdom

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>somewhat slight</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat thin</gloss>
+<gloss>weakish</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>rather light</gloss>
+<gloss>rather pale</gloss>

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>slight</gloss>
-<gloss>thin</gloss>
+<gloss>thinnish</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat slight</gloss>

Probably don't need two "spirits".

@@ -22,1 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>spirit</gloss>

@@ -20,1 +20,4 @@
-<gloss>determined or unyielding spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>determined spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>unyielding spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>will</gloss>

perhaps two senses

daij, prog, 新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>variety of goods</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1100350">バンプ・1</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>seductress</gloss>
+<gloss>vamp</gloss>

daij, nikk, Luminous
Hits in order: 509k, 90k, 71k, 52k, 51k, 48k

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>めった切り</keb>
+<keb>メッタ斬り</keb>
@@ -10,0 +10,12 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>メッタ切り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>滅多斬り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>めった斬り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>めった切り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,1 +23,10 @@
-<reb>めったきり</reb>
+<reb>メッタぎり</reb>
+<re_restr>メッタ斬り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>メッタ切り</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>めったぎり</reb>
+<re_restr>滅多切り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>滅多斬り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>めった斬り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>めった切り</re_restr>

More common form.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>めった切り</keb>
+</k_ele>

Fixing POS.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>hack to pieces</gloss>
+<gloss>hacking to pieces</gloss>

uncommon kanji variant used.  各々の考え gets far more hits.  nevertheless, i think this should be deleted.

first few pages of hits seem to be all spawned from this entry
not in daij/nikk/eij or weblio's wa-ei's

n-grams
偏った考え	452

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>biased view</gloss>
+<gloss>biased view (biassed)</gloss>

GG5

In GG5 - I think it can stay.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>biased view</gloss>
@@ -13,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>partial (one-sided) view</gloss>
+<gloss>one-sided view</gloss>

日本語WordNet(英和), ニューセンチュリー和英辞典 entry on 偏見 ("（偏った考
え）(a) prejudice")
eij "偏った考えを持つ史学者"
2mil results

v+n
maybe worth keeping, but also worth considering for deletion, 
I think.

in eij, but not in daij/nikk

adj+noun

i'm fine with it staying

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>unthinkable</gloss>

in eij and 日本語WordNet(英和)

doesn't seem necessary to me

gg5

eij, eプログレッシブ英和中辞典:
"talk
8 （文字・指・信号で）考えを伝える((with, by ...))."

16,200,000 results

maybe worth keeping, but pretty self-explanatory.

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

20k hits, first page is all spam spawn

not in daij/nikk any of the other usual suspects

daijs nikk

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>賎業婦</keb>
+</k_ele>

とらわれた考え is in a gg5 example and has an eij entry. the meaning is not obvious, so i think it's fine to keep

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とらわれた考え</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

not in any dics
128k results
most of the first page of results is spam spawn, but there's 
at least some real hits too
"苦しみと感情と囚われた考え - 今ここが幸せ"
http://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/wingspace/diary/201004220000/

v+n

翻って	67313
翻って考え	1476	  
翻って考えて	1284
翻って考えるに	263

I'd be inclined to keep it in the "harmless, might be useful" class, but I agree that probably just having 翻って is probably enough.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2514580">翻って・ひるがえって</xref>

G n-grams:
翻って考えてみると	479
翻って考えると	532
翻って考えれば	459
翻って考えてみれば	240

I don't think we need this. The 翻って entry is sufficient, in my view.

I think it's worth keeping. Not sure about dropping the と, as the idiom seems to require と/に to work.

gg5, eij have 翻って考えるに, though the 〜と version gets more hits.  we should probably have at least one of these variants

Agree.

not in any of the usual dics
first page of results is spam spawn

n+v

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

G n-grams:

笹の葉　 110,182 92.8%
篠の葉　      61  0.1% <- daijs
小竹の葉      90  0.1% <- daijr
ささの葉   3,923  3.3%
ササの葉   4,479  3.8%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +21,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ササ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

emphatically NOT {bot}

@@ -22,4 +22,2 @@
-<field>&bot;</field>
-<gloss>bamboo grass (Sasa genus of bamboo)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">general term for smaller bamboo</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">narrowly, running bamboo that does not shed its sheath</gloss>
+<gloss>bamboo grass</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">generally smaller species of running bamboo that do not shed their sheaths (e.g. Sasa spp.)</gloss>

[fld=bot]

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<field>&bot;</field>

GG5 daijr koj ja:WP en:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ササ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sasa_(genus)

Add genus, explanations – both general term, narrow morphological term, and specific taxonomic/cladistic term.
(V. common term – wanted to understand the difference between 竹、笹、篠 （タケ、ササ、シノ）.)

@@ -22,1 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>bamboo grass</gloss>
+<gloss>bamboo grass (Sasa genus of bamboo)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">general term for smaller bamboo</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">narrowly, running bamboo that does not shed its sheath</gloss>

赤色の帽子	176	11.9%
赤色な帽子	0	0.0%
赤の帽子	1303	88.1%
(we have 赤色 tagged as adj-na,adj-no)

not sure I'm a fan of our sense 2. but I guess it's in daijr. should we maybe gloss it as brown;orange instead...?

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -69,0 +70 @@
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
@@ -71 +72 @@
-<gloss>red 5-point card (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>red 5-point card</gloss>

aligning hanafuda terminology

@@ -73 +73 @@
-<gloss>red poetry ribbon card (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>red 5-point card (in hanafuda)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

Sorting on hits.

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>見かじめ料</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +15,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>見かじめ料</keb>

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見かじめ料</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>Three Alls Strategy</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War</gloss>
+<gloss>Three Alls Strategy (Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

GG5: "【日本史】 〔日本軍の殺戮･破壊に対する中国側の称〕 the Sanguang campaign. ▲三光は殺光 (kill all), 搶光 (plunder all), 焼光 (burn all)から."

(a) the entry arrived ca. 2000/2001 when my record-keeping was spotty. I don't have the source.
(b) I'm sure your analysis and revised translation is correct. My only ref with it is GG5, and it pretty much agrees. I was wondering about "Sanguang campaign" as a gloss, but it gets 0 hits as a phrase.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Three Alls Strategy, Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War (三光 is a reference to a Chinese phrase meaning "kill all, burn all, loot all")</gloss>
+<s_inf>三光 is a ref. to a Chinese phrase meaning 'kill all, burn all, loot all'</s_inf>
+<gloss>Three Alls Strategy</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/燼滅作�
%A6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Alls_Policy

What is the origin of the English translation used here -- 
"Three Lights Strategy"? Googling suggests that it may be 
associated primarily with EDICT, and may not be an accepted 
English equivalent of 三光作戦. Certainly the phrase "Three 
Lights Strategy" doesn't appear in the Wikipedia article 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Alls_Policy

I believe "Three Lights Strategy" may have originated from 
EDICT, and if that is the case, I suggest that we delete it 
from the definition, as it is a lousy translation! In 三光作
戦, 三光 is a reference to the Chinese phrase 殺光、燒光、搶光 
(kill all, burn completely, loot everything)

三光とは、殺光・焼光・搶光をさし、それぞれ殺し尽くす・焼き尽くす・奪い尽くすことを意
味する漢語である。(北方漢語で「～光」という接尾詞は「～しつくす」という意味にな
る。)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/燼滅作�%
88%A6

So, in Chinese, 光 (as it's used in 殺光、燒光、搶光) is a verb 
suffix which means "completely; leaving not even a trace" -- 
NOT "light" (the Japanese sense of the character). 

So it seems a bit weird to translate 三光作戦 as the three 
"lights"!

(Of course, 光 can also mean "light" in Chinese, amongst 
other things.)

See also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Alls_Policy
"The expression "Sankō Sakusen", BASED UPON CHINESE TERMS 
[my emphasis], was not used by the Japanese military. 
Rather, it was first popularized in Japan in 1957 when a 
former Japanese soldier released from the Fushun war crime 
internment center wrote a controversial book called The 
Three Alls: Japanese Confessions of War Crimes in China 
(Japanese: 三光、日本人の中国における戦争犯罪の告白, Sankō, Nihonjin 
no Chūgoku ni okeru sensō hanzai no kokuhaku) (new edition: 
Kanki Haruo, 1979), in which a number of Japanese veterans 
confessed to war crimes committed under the leadership of 
General Yasuji Okamura. The publishers were forced to stop 
the publication of the book after receiving death threats 
from Japanese militarists and ultranationalists."

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Three Alls Strategy</gloss>
-<gloss>Three Lights Strategy (Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War)</gloss>
+<gloss>Three Alls Strategy, Japanese scorched earth policy during the second Sino-Japanese War (三光 is a reference to a Chinese phrase meaning "kill all, burn all, loot all")</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

i think it should be kept since it's the primary usage.  but perhaps transferred to a note.  it could also be shortened

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<s_inf>suru and itasu verb forms are used as set phrases said prior to entering or leaving someone's home</s_inf>
@@ -22,1 +23,1 @@
-<gloss>intrusion (suru and itasu verb forms are used as set phrases said prior to entering or leaving someone's home)</gloss>
+<gloss>intrusion</gloss>

Rene put in that gloss, so I'll let him comment.
I think an xref will suffice.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1002050">お邪魔します・おじゃまします</xref>

current gloss feels a bit unwieldy..?

Sorry, I hadn't twigged you proposed dropping 針眼 as well as みず. As it's in all the kokugos I think it's best in its own "arch" entry.

The entry is much cleaner and easier to read without it. If the inclusion of an archaic form introduces a lot of restr tags, I think it should be split out into a separate arch entry or dropped entirely (my preferred option).

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>針眼</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15,2 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>針孔</re_restr>
-<re_restr>穴</re_restr>
@@ -26,6 +20,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みず</reb>
-<re_restr>針孔</re_restr>
-<re_restr>針眼</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -33,2 +21,0 @@
-<stagk>針孔</stagk>
-<stagk>針眼</stagk>
@@ -39,2 +26 @@
-<stagk>針孔</stagk>
-<stagk>穴</stagk>
+<stagr>めど</stagr>

I think みず can stay with a tag. It's in the kokugos, and removing it doesn't simplify the glosses.

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<reb>はりめど</reb>
+<re_restr>針孔</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -26,4 +30 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はりめど</reb>
-<re_restr>針孔</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

みず appears to be archaic. I think it should be split out. Most of the restr tags can then be dropped.
しんこう is only in the unabridged edition of nikk. I think we can drop it.

@@ -30,5 +29,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しんこう</reb>
-<re_restr>針孔</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

No objections, it seems.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トマト・ソース</reb>

Entry created

nikk

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>老女</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

eij, gg5

i'm fine with keeping the base form as in gg5/eij. can be changed directly; not associated with a sound clip

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>考えを文章にまとめる</keb>
+<keb>考えをまとめる</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>考えを文章に纏める</keb>
+<keb>考えを纏める</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>かんがえをぶんしょうにまとめる</reb>
+<reb>かんがえをまとめる</reb>
@@ -16,1 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>to put one's ideas in writing</gloss>
+<gloss>to collect one's thoughts</gloss>
+<gloss>to gather one's thoughts</gloss>
+<gloss>to put one's ideas in order</gloss>

eij
eプログレッシブ英和中辞典: 
"writing
2 書かれたもの（文字など），書かれた状態
put one's ideas in writing
（自分の）考えを文章にまとめる."
109k hits (many real hits on the first page of results)

doesn't seem to be more than the sum

Entry created

i see no support for any of these changes.  AFAICT, there's no indication in dictionaries that this is a taxonomic term, so there's no reason to specify taxonomy in the entry

GG5 daijr koj
See 篠（しの） and 篠竹（しのだけ）

Clarify what kind of bamboo
References for exactly what kind of bamboo this refers to are very mixed, and seems to be applied to various different species and genera (as with ササ).
Notably, GG5 and koj both mention 矢竹（ヤダケ） = arrow bamboo (Pseudosasa japonica), which is unambiguous, but koj mentions in the same breath メダケ and others (esp. at synonymous 篠竹（シノダケ）) also mention this and other species of the Pleioblastus genus, so I’ve put that separately.
I haven’t changed the “thin-culmed dwarf bamboo” gloss, but this looks like it could use a bit of work.

@@ -16,1 +16,8 @@
-<gloss>thin-culmed dwarf bamboo (growing in clusters)</gloss>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>thin-culmed dwarf bamboo, growing in clusters (Pleioblastus genus of bamboo)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2256940">矢竹</xref>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>arrow bamboo (Pseudosasa japonica)</gloss>

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see">篠竹</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2175240">篠竹・しのだけ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2175240">篠竹・しのだけ</xref>

Entry created

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/ngrams/ngramlookup.cgi?sent=ちょこまか&topjuku=on&top100=on

ちょこまか	79305	  
ちょこまかと	25770	  
ちょこまかし	7807	  
ちょこまか動く	4126	
...
vs

ちょこまかと動く	1117

Not sure if adv or adv-to should come first but I think we usually order them like adv,adv-to?

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I see 54k ngrams where it is NOT used with 'to'?

ちょこまか	79305
ちょこまかは	42
ちょこまかが	37
ちょこまかな	78
ちょこまかの	49
ちょこまかと	25770
ちょこまかに	76
ちょこまかする	806
ちょこまかして	3335

Yes, both Daijirin and Daijisen have 副/スル but the n-grams clearly show that it's 
predominantly ちょこまかと.

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

daijisen

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/ngrams/ngramlookup.cgi?
sent=%E3%81%A1%E3%82%87%E3%81%93%E3%81%BE%E3%81%8B&nanox=on

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">losing is winning</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>He that fights and runs away may live to fight another day</gloss>
+<gloss>he that fights and runs away may live to fight another day</gloss>

英語ことわざ教訓辞典, daijs, nikk

made it the same gloss as 逃げるが勝ち
+ "sometimes you have to lose to win"

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to lose is to win</gloss>
+<gloss>He that fights and runs away may live to fight another day</gloss>
+<gloss>sometimes you have to lose to win</gloss>

Entry created

daijs 回族 entry:
"中国の少数民族の一。イスラム教を信仰し、主に寧夏(ねいか)回族自
治区に居住する。13世紀に西アジアから移住したイスラム教徒が先祖
で、漢族などと混血して少数民族的集団を形成。もと、回民と呼ばれ
た。ホイ族。ホイホイ。"

@@ -45,0 +46,6 @@
+<stagr>ホイホイ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2157410">回族</xref>
+<gloss>Hui (people)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

Gg5, ルミナス, 新和英中辞典, Sanseido Grand Concise, Kodansha GJD: "物事を気軽に引き受けるさま。"

It's instructive that all the refs above put the "recklessly; thoughtlessly...." sense first. I think it shows the problems with following the sense-ordering of the 国語s.

@@ -10,0 +10,22 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
+<gloss>thoughtlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>carelessly</gloss>
+<gloss>readily</gloss>
+<gloss>blithely</gloss>
+<gloss>willingly</gloss>
+<gloss>easily</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>pamperingly</gloss>
+<gloss>indulgently</gloss>
+<gloss>carefully (not angering)</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -24,20 +46,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
-<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
-<gloss>thoughtlessly</gloss>
-<gloss>readily</gloss>
-<gloss>blithely</gloss>
-<gloss>willingly</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
-<gloss>pamperingly</gloss>
-<gloss>indulgently</gloss>
-<gloss>carefully (not angering)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>

daij, nikk
"pamperingly" has a wiktionary entry and gets ca 12k hits

sense 3 ("hallo") is possibly arch (daij examples from 狂言記 
(1660))

@@ -7,0 +7,16 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホイホイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>shoo!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>heave-ho</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>hallo</gloss>
+<gloss>hello</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -9,2 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>Shoo! (used to drive away people or animals)</gloss>
-<gloss>without considering the pros and (particularly) the cons</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +35,2 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +38,10 @@
-<gloss>to pamper</gloss>
-<gloss>to spoil</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>pamperingly</gloss>
+<gloss>indulgently</gloss>
+<gloss>carefully (not angering)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>novice</gloss>
+<gloss>beginner</gloss>

gg5, eij

common enough, potentially useful for e-j

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>the more one thinks about it</gloss>

eij example sentences
not in daij/nikk

standard application of ・・・ば、・・・ほど

- honyaku list (post dated Fri, 21 May 2010 11:41:00 -0700)
- EIJIRO has one usage sample

@@ -13,0 +13,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴルーテ・ソース</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブルーテ・ソース</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブルテー・ソース</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijs, wiki

ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/独鈷
Here’s an English ref:
http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=ZzIXkFec0e8C&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=vajra+tokko

* Add direct sense “single-pronged vajra” – this is a variety of vajra.
* [fld=Buddh]
(Seen at temples.)

@@ -21,0 +21,2 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>single-pronged vajra</gloss>

daijs

@@ -7,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>独古</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>独股</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>どっこ</reb>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -12,1 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>copper or iron Buddhistic ritual tool/vajra</gloss>
+<gloss>tokko</gloss>
+<gloss>dokko</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">copper or iron implement, pointed at both ends, used in esoteric Buddhist rituals</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cloth of a tokko pattern</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<gloss>coworking</gloss>