Don't need note with the rK tag now.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<s_inf>じーっと is more emphatic. 凝乎と is rare.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>じーっと is more emphatic</s_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Fixed the WWWJDIC bug.

@@ -24,1 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -34,1 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -42,1 +40,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -50,1 +47,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5 daijr koj

** Display is a bit broken – these all give [uk], but displays the kanji first, instead of in 《》 **
elab glosses and usage examples (think, endure, etc.)
(read in poem, for (standing) motionless: じっと立っていた)

@@ -29,1 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>motionlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>motionlessly (e.g. stand, wait)</gloss>
+<gloss>(be) still</gloss>
@@ -36,1 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>fixedly (e.g. of staring)</gloss>
+<gloss>fixedly (e.g. gaze, stare)</gloss>
+<gloss>intently (e.g. listen, think)</gloss>
@@ -43,1 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>patiently</gloss>
+<gloss>patiently (endure)</gloss>
+<gloss>stoically</gloss>

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>fall lightly (e.g. snow, petals, confetti)</gloss>
+<gloss>falling lightly (e.g. snow, petals, confetti)</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

Remove [adv] (implied by [adv-to])
Some tweaking to glosses – some examples etc. (it’s already quite good though!)
BTW, re: [vs] – at least senses 1,2,3 “flutter”, “flicker”, “appear and disappear” certainly take する (as in daijr examples). Others presumably can potentially take する.

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>fall lightly (e.g. snow, petals, confetti)</gloss>
@@ -22,1 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -33,1 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +36,1 @@
+<gloss>catching glimpses</gloss>
@@ -40,1 +39,7 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1007920">ちらっと</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>glancing (repeatedly)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -44,7 +49,1 @@
-<gloss>glancing</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>(hear, see) from time to time</gloss>

See rejected 2728290.

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チラッチラッ</reb>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

daij

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -10,0 +11,8 @@
+<gloss>unexpectedly (showing up)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>slowly swaying</gloss>
+<gloss>staggering</gloss>
+<gloss>moving feebly</gloss>

蜚蠊	136
蜚ぶり	40
ごきぶり	37484
ゴキブリ	864819

@@ -6,3 +6 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>蜚ぶり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蜚ぶり</keb>

wiki, nikk
難読語辞典, 歴史民俗用語辞典, 動物名辞典, 季語・季題辞典 (all on weblio)

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蜚蠊</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ごきぶり</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10,0 +17,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">brothel where one can bathe with the prostitutes</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">brothel where one can bathe with prostitutes</gloss>

Aligning with ソープランド entry.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>brothel where one can bathe with the prostitutes</gloss>
+<gloss>soapland</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">brothel where one can bathe with the prostitutes</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ソープ�
%A9%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89

googling soap, 6 out of 10 entries are about "soaplands" (the 
6 first)

@@ -12,0 +12,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1075350">ソープランド</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>brothel where one can bathe with the prostitutes</gloss>
+</sense>

http://www2.wbs.ne.jp/~kurogane/kaburoom/herher.html

Sense 2 was added in 2008 by Paul Blay, who quoted the above ref. It seems he made a cut-and-paste error with the restriction.

@@ -23,1 +23,1 @@
-<stagr>ヘルクレス</stagr>
+<stagr>ヘラクレス</stagr>

I can't find evidence of the 2nd sense anywhere.
there's a redirect on wiki from ヘルクレス but it doesn't imply 
that the word (it's one of 10 redirects)
I think it should be removed (unless it's in GG5 or something)

@@ -25,0 +25,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2737980">ヘラクレス大兜</xref>
@@ -26,1 +27,1 @@
-<gloss>Dynastes hercules (variety of rhinoceros beetle)</gloss>
+<gloss>Hercules beetle (Dynastes hercules)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>trademark</s_inf>
+<field>&tradem;</field>

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>trademarked name</s_inf>
+<s_inf>trademark</s_inf>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>outdoor obstacle course</gloss>
+<gloss>adventure course</gloss>
+<gloss>(outdoor) obstacle course</gloss>

(daijr: 〔和 field＋athletics〕)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">Field Athletic</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">field athletic</lsource>

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロスト・ジェネレーション</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Lost Generation</gloss>
+<gloss>lost generation</gloss>

I wouldn't object to keeping the "rK".

maybe not; just saw the notes below

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 嘘　 | 5,772,972 |
| 噓　 |     5,176 |
| うそ | 1,605,358 |
| ウソ | 2,472,885 |

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -46,3 +46,3 @@
-<gloss>No way!</gloss>
-<gloss>Unbelievable!</gloss>
-<gloss>Really?!</gloss>
+<gloss>no way!</gloss>
+<gloss>unbelievable!</gloss>
+<gloss>really?!</gloss>

Fork.

That's never been a hard-and-fast rule, though. We'll often put less common senses first, e.g. when there's a literal and figurative meaning.
The major JEs also tend to put more common senses first but they all lead with "circle" in this case.

But... the dictionary style is to put the most 
common meaning first. Esp. when we're talking 
spoken language, "yen" must be more than 2 
orders of magnitude more common as a meaning 
for 円 than "circle" is. I don't think　we 
should make ad-hoc exceptions on the fly 
either, if "circle" should come first, then we 
should implement a concise and clear rule/test 
for when a less common meaning should 
supersede the most common one.

I don't think it matters that "yen" is more common. 円/circle is an extremely common and basic word. Looks odd having it after the currency sense.

"yen" is the more common meaning by far, so I 
disagree. （I don't think the note is needed 
either.）

No, furigana.info's frequency info is mainly based on furigana usage in 青空文庫 novels/short stories.

I think that site just uses dictionary information, so in terms of usage it's irrelevant.

https://furigana.info/w/円
“円”のいろいろな読み方と例文
まる	62.8%
まろ	10.1%
...
えん	4.5%
(this includes 円い, 円やか, etc. though)

Reopen.

えんを描く	< 20
まるを描く	54

I'm happy with this order, but the note has to go - that sense is alive and well. I wonder how many people on seeing 円 solo in the context of a circle would read it as えん rather than まる?
I'll close this, and reopen for further discussion, if needed.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>

see the following jmdict entries for examples:
マルＣ
マル優
マル暴
マル査
マル秘

prob only applies to sense 1. I was considering adding it to the 〇 entry but that's really just an entry for the symbol, while this 
is for the word.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マル</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

gg5, prog, nc, meikyo, koj, daij

in theory, 丸 also applies to spheres, whereas 円 only applies to circles

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>円</keb>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1000090">○・まる・1</xref>
@@ -17,2 +21,6 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>full (e.g. month, day, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<gloss>entirety</gloss>
+<gloss>whole</gloss>
+<gloss>full</gloss>
+<gloss>complete</gloss>
@@ -21,3 +29,16 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>perfection</gloss>
-<gloss>purity</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>money</gloss>
+<gloss>dough</gloss>
+<gloss>moola</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. 丸</s_inf>
+<gloss>enclosure inside a castle's walls</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1575430">スッポン</xref>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
+<gloss>soft-shelled turtle</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +48,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1525740">麻呂・3</xref>
+<s_inf>esp. 丸</s_inf>
@@ -28,0 +51,3 @@
+<gloss>suffix for names of people (esp. infants)</gloss>
+<gloss>suffix for names of swords, armour, musical instruments, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>suffix for names of dogs, horses, etc.</gloss>

-the added sense seems no different than sense 1 to me.
-obviously sense 4 should be a suffix, not a prefix

@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -29,5 +29,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<s_inf>e.g. 丸2 for ②</s_inf>
-<gloss>circle (circled number)</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>limiting</gloss>

eij
yomiuri article:
"購入見送りによる韓国国債市場への影響は限定的とみられるが[...]"
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/20120823-OYT1T01565.htm?
from=main2

maybe 2 senses though? if "limiting" is valid

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>limiting</gloss>
+<gloss>limited</gloss>

https://www.homes.co.jp/chintai/room/1065871cf4f081a4a1726fe0b275c60fc5a8dfbe/?bid=1260230001348
"コンロ二口"

@@ -83 +83 @@
-<gloss>counter for mouthfuls, shares (of money), and swords</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for mouthfuls, shares (of money), stove burners, and swords</gloss>

@@ -66 +66 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2273800">口がかかる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2273800">口がかかる・1</xref>

Link “(job) opening” to longer form 働き口
Though at first glance this may appear to be slang or an abbreviation, as per koj etc. this is a long-established usage, e.g., 奉公の口 from 世間胸算用 (1692), so not marked as [col] or [abbr].
(Used in class in both forms.)

@@ -60,0 +60,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1451070">働き口</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
2,542,991	 76.4%	刺繍
  707,439	 21.3%	刺しゅう
      343	  0.0%	刺繡
   75,831	  2.3%	ししゅう

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

meikyo

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

世界大百科事典 第２版 ( http://kotobank.jp/word/刺繡 )
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刺繡
64k hits when searching Japanese pages

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>刺繡</keb>

I think it can be dropped. Not even koj has it.

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>

I only see こん in daijirin and nikkoku.
Their example sources seem quite old (雑兵物語 and 心中宵庚申, respectively).

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Indeed. My apologies. I saw the proposed gloss and immediately assumed it was the 終助 こと.

@@ -86,0 +87,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as 〜ことだ</s_inf>
+<gloss>you should ...</gloss>
+<gloss>I advise that you ...</gloss>
+<gloss>it's important to ...</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, gg5

Trying to make sense 2 a little clearer.

@@ -23,2 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>receptacle for things</gloss>
-<gloss>receiving something (e.g. funds)</gloss>
+<gloss>person (group, institution, etc.) to take over a position or matter</gloss>
+<gloss>receptacle (e.g. of funds)</gloss>
+<gloss>receiver</gloss>

daijr

Alt spelling 受皿

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>受皿</keb>

gg5, prog

If the first sense is [uk], I imagine senses 2 and 3 are as well.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>sheath</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>case</gloss>
+<gloss>sleeve</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +30 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijs
not 常用漢字
kana rather than kanji used in movie title "さや侍"

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cap (on pen, brush, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +31,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>enclosure</gloss>
+<gloss>outer fence</gloss>
+</sense>

Fixed. I see that of my JEs only GG5 has sense 1 at all.

daij, gg5, prog

More senses.
One of the sentences is incorrectly tagged as sense 1 instead of 2.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1357710">色合い</xref>
@@ -18,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>shade of colour</gloss>
-<gloss>shade of color</gloss>
+<gloss>shade of colour (color)</gloss>
@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>sex appeal (esp. women)</gloss>
-<gloss>interest in the opposite sex</gloss>
-<gloss>sensuality</gloss>
+<gloss>sex appeal (esp. of women)</gloss>
+<gloss>sexiness</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual allure</gloss>
@@ -27,3 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>glamor</gloss>
-<gloss>glamour</gloss>
-<gloss>sexual passion</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +30,8 @@
+<gloss>interest in the opposite sex</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual feelings</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual urge</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>charm</gloss>
+<gloss>elegance</gloss>
@@ -34,2 +39,5 @@
-<gloss>poetry</gloss>
-<gloss>charm</gloss>
+<gloss>graciousness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>feminine presence</gloss>
@@ -40,0 +49 @@
+<gloss>ambition</gloss>
@@ -42 +50,0 @@
-<gloss>ambition</gloss>

GG5 daijr

front “sex appeal” on sense 2
“esp. women” (daijr notes “esp. women”, GG5’s examples are primarily women, but one male example as well)

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>sex appeal (esp. women)</gloss>
@@ -24,1 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>sex appeal</gloss>

daij, meikyo, chujiten

I think so.
I don't think sense 2 is vs.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>announcement</gloss>
+<gloss>prior announcement</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

vi?

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

大辞泉

「大丈夫だろう。この砂の流れ方は崩れる前触れじゃない」

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>sign</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

I think "constitution" belongs on sense 4.
The "corpse" sense appears to be archaic.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -41,0 +41,6 @@
+<gloss>frame</gloss>
+<gloss>figure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>health</gloss>
@@ -46,5 +51 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>health</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Quiet. Closing.

This keeps coming up - someone tried to add からだ as a reading to the 身体・しんたい entry in 2019.
The JEs and Koj only have しんたい for 身体. The other kokugos list 身体 as a form for からだ but have it later than 体; which matches what we have.
I don't propose to merge the entries again, but I'll suggest a note on the 身体・しんたい entry similar to the one on sense 1 here.

https://youglish.com/pronounce/身体/japanese

I have no changes to suggest, but wanted to bring attention to this site. It 
wasn't well known at the time this entry was last edited. I always flip through 
this when I'm unsure of the reading or pitch accent for something

Hearing a lot more からだ than しんたい, especially when not in a compound

G-ngrams gg5

moving adj-no first

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -29 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -37 +37,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

chujiten
当たり前さ.
Of course.
saito
1（＝当然のこと）（a matter） of course
怒ったかって?　あたりまえさ
Am I angry? Of course, I am.

"of course" will frequently be the most natural 
translation, but "of course" is, of course, not an 
adjective. Should it maybe be listed as a third sense as an 
exp?

@@ -41,0 +41,2 @@
+<gloss>commonplace</gloss>
+<gloss>the norm</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>China, Japan and Korea</gloss>

From my experience, it's more often political than 
specifically about characters:
日中韓三国間協力 etc.
other stuff in the news (turns up on google news search)
"日中韓でＦＴＡ実務会合＝日韓とは別対応―政府"
http://jp.wsj.com/Japan/Economy/node_498182
"日中韓学生交流環境フォーラム:閉講　政治摩擦超え、心一つ"
http://mainichi.jp/feature/news/20120824ddm041040163000c.htm
l

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Chinese, Japanese and Korean (usu. characters, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese, Japanese and Korean</gloss>

The JEs don't mention the inaka gloss. It's fine but I don't think it should lead.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>language used in rural areas</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>language used in rural areas</gloss>

鄙言	169	67.3%
卑言	0	0.0%
鄙語	82	32.7%

Not this term, but the related 卑語. Only sense [2] would seem to apply.
https://www.jlogos.com/d011/4377315.html
卑語・鄙語【ひご】
①いやしい言葉。
[基本例]「卑（鄙）語を使うものではない。」
[類語]卑言。スラング。
[対語]雅語。
②いなかびた言葉。
[基本例]「原住民の卑（鄙）語は通訳がむずかしい。」

Comments on 卑語[2].  Marked 卑語[2] as [obs] because I don't think it is usable with the sense given here. Not sure if this is [obs], [rare], [dated].   IME won't even build this word(either kanji). The reason that ngrams for 鄙言 beat 卑言 would seem to be that this term has fallen into almost complete disuse.  Google results suggests it is principally vocab trivia.

"language used in rural areas" is wordy, but this is not a term for anyone to use in practice either.  Better that if someone search "vulgar" they don't think to use this.　Given that this is rare and dated, given the kokugo definition "slang" seems out of place. 

jlogos has "スラング" as 類語 on 卑語 for sense [1], but we don't have "slang" there (nor do I think we should).

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>language used in rural areas</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>slang expression</gloss>

GG5

Sorted on hits. Seems not to be quite the same as 鄙諺.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鄙言</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>vulgar expression</gloss>
+<gloss>vulgarism</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1043
001175

I've heard "aburamushi" to mean "cockroach" so obsc is 
probably not right

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>

daijs

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚜虫</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

ふるいにかけ	22341	74.6%
篩に掛け	        597	2.0%
ふるいに掛け	2473	8.3%
篩にかけ	        1998	6.7%
篩いにかけ	2146	7.2%
篩いに掛け	412	1.4%

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

JWN, G ngrams:
篩に掛ける	107
ふるいに掛ける	634
篩にかける	820
篩いにかける	871
篩いに掛ける	127

Relatively common "io" versions.

@@ -11,0 +12,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>篩いにかける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>篩いに掛ける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

GG5

Add metaphorical sense (and a few more glosses).
(Used in class, referring to job candidates.)

@@ -21,0 +21,7 @@
+<gloss>to winnow</gloss>
+<gloss>to separate (wheat from chaff)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to screen (candidates)</gloss>

茹蛸	4280	34.5%
茹でタコ	2864	23.1%
茹でダコ	2788	22.5%
茹で蛸	2076	16.7% <- most references
茹だこ	42	0.3%
茹ダコ	365	2.9%
GG5: a man as red as a lobster.
中辞典: グラス 1 杯のビールでゆでだこのように赤くなる go as red as a boiled lobster after a single glass of beer.

The JEs all like the lobster version.
I'm demoting the 茹蛸. While it's the most common single term, the term is most commonly 茹で[蛸,ダコ,タコ].

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>茹蛸</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +14,3 @@
+<keb>茹蛸</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
@@ -25,2 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹だこ</re_restr>
@@ -36 +36,0 @@
-<re_restr>茹ダコ</re_restr>
@@ -39,0 +40 @@
+<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
@@ -41 +41,0 @@
-<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
@@ -52 +52 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">person with red flushed skin (esp. due to a hot bath or alcohol consumption)</gloss>
+<gloss>person with red flushed skin</gloss>

daijs:  風呂に入ったり、酒に酔ったりして赤くなったさまのたとえ。 「怒って茹で蛸になる」
sanokoku:入浴や飲酒などで赤くなった人 

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/red_as_a_lobster#:~:text=Adjective,synonym ▲ Synonym: lobster
Bright red in color, especially from a bad sunburn

https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/as-red-as-a-lobster.3243268/
As lobsters (at least boiled ones) are red all over their body, "red as a lobster" is usually used when someone has been sunburned particularly all over their body

https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/as-red-as-a-lobster.2979095/
I hear it mostly when people talk about sunburn.
Also, if you want to say that someone turned red from embarrassment, you can say that they turned "beet red." (My mom uses this one all the time.)

https://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2007-05-02/onsen-zen
. The Japanese consider that bathing nirvana is achieved at the yudedako, or "boiled octopus," stage. Place a folded washcloth on your forehead to keep cool.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2003/04/20/travel/seeking-tranquillity-in-tohoku/
 The region used to be known as Michinoku, meaning, ... onsen bath in Japan to complete that essential yude-dako (boiled octopus) look.


https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q138593103
お風呂に入っていると、ゆでだこにならないように言われます
なんで茹でタコと言うのですか

タコはゆでると真っ赤になるので人も長湯でゆでだこみたいに
なるよ！というのです。

I am not the only one who thinks "red as a lobster", if anything, means "sunburned all over ones body".  I don't think these idioms match, which makes this a misleading gloss.

I'm not sure we have a useful idiomatic substitute. The explanation for the idiom is apparently (see last ref) that octopuses turn bright red when boiled. So the connection to hot baths is not arbitrary. Both dictionaries call out baths and alcohol specifically.　Can also refer to alcohol-induced flushing, and anger, etc.  No apparent connection to sunburns.

I imagine "alcohol" applies due to the Japanese genetic disposition toward alcohol intolerance(cheeks may flush red).  Westerners don't turn red from drinking (generally). 

We also don't have a hot-bath culture, so we seem to be lacking for a truly equivalent idiom.

Here's an illustrated octopus with a towel on its head in a bath:
お湯に浸かって茹蛸になるタコ
https://www.ac-illust.com/main/detail.php?id=1069549&word=お湯に浸かって茹蛸になるタコ&searchId=

Here's an angry octopus: 怒るタコ / ゆでだこ
https://japaclip.com/angry-octopus/

@@ -52 +52 @@
-<gloss>person as red as a lobster</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">person with red flushed skin (esp. due to a hot bath or alcohol consumption)</gloss>

@@ -50,0 +51 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

茹でタコ	2864
茹でダコ	2788
茹蛸	4280
茹で蛸	2076
茹だこ	42
茹ダコ	365
茹たこ	41

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>茹蛸</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>茹蛸</keb>
@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<reb>ゆでだこ</reb>
+<re_restr>茹蛸</re_restr>
+<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
+<re_restr>茹だこ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -31,6 +36,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ゆでだこ</reb>
-<re_restr>茹蛸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹で蛸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹だこ</re_restr>

https://www.japanesepod101.com/japanese-phrases/09232019?meaning

@@ -15,0 +16,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>茹だこ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>茹ダコ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +30 @@
+<re_restr>茹ダコ</re_restr>
@@ -28,0 +36 @@
+<re_restr>茹だこ</re_restr>

Splitting off 訊く and removing all those restrictions. Daijr, etc. have 聞く and 聴く merged.

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>訊く</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22 +17,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -42 +36,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -50 +43,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -59 +51,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -68 +59,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -76 +66,0 @@
-<stagk>聞く</stagk>

For 聴く, I'm not sure which option is best but I definitely think 訊く would be better as a separate entry.

With 6 of the 8 senses restricted to 聞く, including sense 1, I wonder if 聴く and 訊く should 
be moved out. I'll approve and reopen.

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog

That restriction means that only 訊く is used for sense 3, which isn't correct.
The only way to indicate that 訊く only applies to sense 3 is to add restrictions to all the other senses.
A cleaner solution (and what I propose) is to split 訊く out into its own entry which points here. Most of the refs don't include it as a headword, only as a "「訊く」とも書く" note.
---
I've added a couple of senses.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -29 +30 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 聴く</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 聴く</s_inf>
@@ -33 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>訊く</stagk>
@@ -36 +36 @@
-<s_inf>聴く is more formal</s_inf>
+<s_inf>聴く is used in legal and official contexts</s_inf>
@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -43,0 +45,2 @@
+<gloss>to hear about</gloss>
+<gloss>to hear of</gloss>
@@ -45 +47,0 @@
-<gloss>to hear about</gloss>
@@ -47,0 +50 @@
+<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -50 +53,3 @@
-<gloss>to follow (advice)</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (advice, order, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to obey</gloss>
+<gloss>to listen to</gloss>
@@ -55 +60,9 @@
-<stagk>聴く</stagk>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to hear (e.g. a plea)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grant (a request)</gloss>
+<gloss>to accept (e.g. an argument)</gloss>
+<gloss>to give consideration to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>聞く</stagk>
@@ -60 +73,9 @@
-<gloss>to sample fragrance</gloss>
+<gloss>to sample (a fragrance)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>聞く</stagk>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>also 利く</s_inf>
+<gloss>to taste (alcohol)</gloss>
+<gloss>to try</gloss>

That's just duplicated a gloss in sense 1.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/淡々

@@ -45,0 +46,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>matter-of-fact(ly)</gloss>
+</sense>

prog, ALC

@@ -29,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>dispassionate</gloss>
+<gloss>matter-of-fact</gloss>
+<gloss>detached</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 淡々　　 │ 1,244,115 │ 84.5% │
│ 淡淡　　 │     5,399 │  0.4% │
│ 澹々　　 │        32 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK
│ 澹澹　　 │        56 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ たんたん │   221,969 │ 15.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

prog, ALC

@@ -29,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>dispassionate</gloss>
+<gloss>matter-of-fact</gloss>
+<gloss>detached</gloss>

We accept 50%+ for [uk].

All these stats were given earlier, actually:

ちりばめた	85914	49.2%
散りばめた	88672	50.8% <- kanji wins

ちりばめ	397259	49.6%
散りばめ	403200	50.4% <- kanji wins

Dictionary form is more likely kanji, but dictionary form isn't common.
散りばめる	8731	47.5%
ちりばめる	9668	52.5% <- kana wins

Removed [uk].  What is our official cutoff for [uk] by the way?  

This is very close to a 50/50 split, so probably not controversial to remove here (encountered myself in song lyrics with kanji).

But it now occurs to me that I've been treating it as 50%, and that has always appeared to me to be the practice here.

I've never participated in a discussion on this question, but it seems like [uk] should imply kana-only should be well above 50%.  "Usually" seems quite a bit stronger to me than "more often than not". Or, phrased differently, it seems like if you are highly likely to encounter the kanji form, and if you wouldn't look odd using the kanji form, then [uk] might be misleading.

Incidentally (reading earlier comments), this was also a "star studded sky"-type context.

====

I googled "what percent is usually".  Google returns:
https://grammar.reverso.net/frequency/
always	100 percent of the time (or almost 100%).
usually	about 80 percent of the time.  <----- 80%, seems close to my intuition
often	more than half of the time.
sometimes less than half of the time.
rarely	about 20 percent of the time.
never	at no time.

Whatever our intentions might be, or might have been, it seems reasonable to expect that an average reader who sees "usually kana" on a term is going to expect something in the 80%+ range, not 50.01%+.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

散りばめる is in 中辞典 too.
Meikyo: 表記「散りばめる」と書くのは標準的でない。

Despite being relatively rare, 鏤める is the only kanji form listed in most refs. I only see 散りばめる in daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 散りばめる │   8,731 │ 45.8% │
│ 鏤める　　 │     669 │  3.5% │
│ ちりばめる │   9,668 │ 50.7% │
├─ーーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 散りばめ　 │ 403,200 │ 49.7% │
│ 鏤め　　　 │  11,223 │  1.4% │
│ 散り嵌め　 │      51 │  0.3% │
│ ちりばめ　 │ 397,259 │ 48.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to enchase (a thing) with</gloss>
-<gloss>to mount (gem)</gloss>
+<gloss>to enchase (something) with</gloss>
+<gloss>to mount (gems)</gloss>

Really I'd like to go back to Rene's 2007 version. The best way is to reject these changes.

Stalling until the problem with 2736680 is resolved.

splitting, because it would get way too messy with all other 
meanings and readings in here

@@ -10,8 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かみづかさ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かんづかさ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19,1 +11,0 @@
-<stagr>じんぎかん</stagr>

GG5 & ルミナス use kana for examples.

篩	33238
篩い	13672
ふるい	263779
also my IME brings up ふるい before 篩

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -23,2 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="see">篩に掛ける</xref>
-<gloss>(job, candidate) screen</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1570310">篩に掛ける・2</xref>
+<gloss>screening (jobs, candidates, etc.)</gloss>

GG5

Add metaphorical sense (as separate from literal sense).
(Used in class.)

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>sifter</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see">篩に掛ける</xref>
+<gloss>(job, candidate) screen</gloss>
+</sense>

wiki, 20k hits
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジュネ�
%BC%E3%83%B4%E6%9D%A1%E7%B4%84

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ジュネーヴ条約</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>ジュネーブ条約</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジュネーヴじょうやく</reb>
+<re_restr>ジュネーヴ条約</re_restr>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本語の一人称代名詞#おら（俺ら）
meikyo: 現代では方言的

This is still used in certain dialects.
I don't think we need rK tags on an archaic/dialectal entry like this.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +23 @@
+<s_inf>dialectal in contemporary Japanese</s_inf>

199 sentences indexed to 俺. I think I've locked them to the おれ reading.

fine as kanji with rK?

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺ら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
@@ -21 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written 俺 and 俺ら</s_inf>

This is a fork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not and could not be used as cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

To work better with the ken'nata entry

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting (often with a rectangular blade)</gloss>

I don't think the "type of" contributes anything.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

I'm fine either way, though I lean towards just having the description.

I'm not a big fan of "type of..." expl glosses as the only gloss. I think it's better to include the Japanese term first in entries like 
these.
(I wouldn't mind "nata knife" or "nata machete" but "nata" by itself is perhaps "cleaner")

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

daijr koj daijs
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/170777/m0u/
87,900 練香
37,400 練り香
29,200 煉香
   691 煉り香

Alt kanji (note that 煉り香 is very rare)
Wording of definition – [equiv] first etc.
Saw as 煉香 on flyer.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>練香</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +11,4 @@
-<keb>練香</keb>
+<keb>煉香</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>煉り香</keb>
@@ -16,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>round cake of incense, esp. used in koudou</gloss>
-<gloss>pastille</gloss>
+<gloss>(incense) pastille</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">round cake of incense, esp. used in incense ceremony</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -28,0 +28,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

nikk, daijs

@@ -14,0 +14,7 @@
+<reb>ごきかぶろう</reb>
+<re_restr>御器噛</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ごっかぶり</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -21,2 +28,1 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>Zen stick (used by a Zen priest to strike an inattentive Zazen sitter)</gloss>
+<gloss>Zen stick (used by a Zen priest to strike an inattentive zazen sitter)</gloss>

daijs (こうざく), nikk (きょうしゃく)

@@ -12,0 +12,7 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こうざく</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きょうしゃく</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Entry created

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１５日</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,2 +13 @@
-<keb>１５日</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<keb>一五日</keb>
@@ -18 +21 @@
-<gloss>fifteenth day of the month</gloss>
+<gloss>15th day of the month</gloss>
@@ -22 +25 @@
-<gloss>fifteen days</gloss>
+<gloss>15 days</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１５日</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>the 15h day of the month</gloss>
+<gloss>fifteenth day of the month</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fifteen days</gloss>

Entry created

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_universe_(fiction)

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パラレル・ワールド</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>parallel universe</gloss>
+<gloss>alternative reality</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウッド・パルプ</reb>

over 4mil hits vs 300k

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<gloss>woodpulp</gloss>
+<gloss>wood pulp</gloss>

Entry created

Daijr, GG5

I think the "of a trip" is implied.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>spending one night of a trip in a car or on a train</gloss>
+<gloss>spending the night in a car, train, bus, etc.</gloss>

daijs, wiki

maybe more clear this way?

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>sleeping in a vehicle, train, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>spending one night of a trip in a car or on a train</gloss>

Entry created

GG5

[fld=med]
More glosses and explanation of what this is

Read in 檸檬 by 梶井基次郎
The English gloss is archaic; modern (more generic? term) seems to be capillary bronchitis or bronchiolitis, but not sure, and anyway for accuracy the gloss should also be old-fashioned (hence the [expl]).

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>肺尖加答児</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,2 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>catarrh of the pulmonary apex</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">inflammation of the mucous of the upper lung</gloss>

koj

ｇｇ５

* [on-mim]
* link to alt/longer form

@@ -18,0 +18,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2059800">ぴゅうぴゅう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2059800">ぴゅうぴゅう</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Oops.

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>whiz (e.g. projectile through air</gloss>
+<gloss>whiz (e.g. projectile through air)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I really can't see 4 senses there. I think they are just different ways of expressing sense 1.

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>whiz (projectile through air, e.g. bullet, arrow, rock)</gloss>
+<gloss>whiz (e.g. projectile through air</gloss>
@@ -21,13 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>whistle</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>sound of a whistle</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>sound of a wind</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>sound of water spouting forth</gloss>
+<gloss>whistling sound</gloss>

GG5 ぴゅうと ぴゅうんと
daijr koj

Add alt form ぴゅうん
(heard on TV re: ball whizzing around)
Add more defns

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぴゅん</reb>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>whiz (projectile through air, e.g. bullet, arrow, rock)</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>whistle</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +27,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>sound of a wind</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>sound of water spouting forth</gloss>
+</sense>

《现代汉语词典》 汤面 tāngmiàn
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/湯麵

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">tang mian</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">tāngmiàn</lsource>

I think the gloss alone is fine.

@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">ramen noodles served in a salty soup, topped with stir-fried vegetables</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/タンメン

[fld=food]
elab (“noodle soup” is vague)

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -14,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>noodle soup</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese-style stir-fried vegetable noodle soup</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">ramen noodles served in a salty soup, topped with stir-fried vegetables</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisbein

(English ref)

daijr

[fld=food]
(Saw at restaurant)

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

@@ -9,1 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>eisbein (German cured meat dish)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Eisbein</lsource>
+<gloss>eisbein</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">German dish of pickled ham hock</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アイスバイン

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１９日</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,2 +13 @@
-<keb>１９日</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<keb>一九日</keb>
@@ -18 +21 @@
-<gloss>nineteenth day of the month</gloss>
+<gloss>19th day of the month</gloss>
@@ -22 +25 @@
-<gloss>nineteen days</gloss>
+<gloss>19 days</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>１９日</keb>
+<keb>十九日</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>十九日</keb>
+<keb>１９日</keb>