Done

Approving, then reopening to remind me to fix the sentence indices.

Splitting on source word.

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1040380">硝子・ガラス</xref>
-<gloss>glass</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1040380">ガラス・1</xref>
+<gloss>glass (material)</gloss>
@@ -20,5 +20 @@
-<gloss>glasses</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>grass</gloss>
+<gloss>glasses (eyewear)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I think the main sense is the drinking vessel, and that's what the original 1st sense was.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<gloss>glass</gloss>
+<gloss>glass (drinking vessel)</gloss>
@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>glass cup</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1040380">硝子・ガラス</xref>
+<gloss>glass</gloss>

nikk ほかに「亜美利加」「阿米利加」などの表記もあった。


亜米利加	30574	97.7%
亜墨利加	611	2.0%
阿米利加	31	0.1% saw in 1902 book 
亜美利加	69	0.2%

@@ -12,0 +13,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>阿米利加</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>亜美利加</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

OK, I'll work on the sentence indices and the xrefs.

daijs: 「アメリカ合衆国」の略。

Definitely the most common name for the US, and アメリカ redirects to アメリカ合衆国 on Wikipedia.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1149840">アメリカ合衆国</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -19 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>America</gloss>
+<gloss>(United States of) America</gloss>
+<gloss>United States</gloss>
+<gloss>US</gloss>
+<gloss>USA</gloss>
@@ -24 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>United States of America</gloss>
+<gloss>America (land mass)</gloss>
+<gloss>the Americas</gloss>

daijr: ③ （多く「梳く」と書く）もつれていた毛にくしを入れて整える。とかす。「髪を―・く」
meikyo: ❹ もつれた髪の毛に櫛くしを入れてととのえる。すく。とかす。「梳く」とも。→解かす

Proposal made on 2063050.

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>梳く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -62,3 +66,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2063050">梳く・すく</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2063050">梳く・すく・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2063050">梳く・すく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1598660">とかす</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>also written as 梳く</s_inf>

gg5, prog, nc, meikyo

梳く is not iK.  i've added とく as a reading to the entry for 梳く, which eliminates all the unnecessary restrictions here

@@ -8,4 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>梳く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -17,8 +13,0 @@
-<stagk>解く</stagk>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to solve</gloss>
-<gloss>to answer</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>解く</stagk>
@@ -28,0 +16,5 @@
+<gloss>to unfasten</gloss>
+<gloss>to unwrap</gloss>
+<gloss>to undo</gloss>
+<gloss>to unbind</gloss>
+<gloss>to unpack</gloss>
@@ -32,2 +25,40 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 梳く</s_inf>
-<gloss>to comb</gloss>
+<gloss>to unsew</gloss>
+<gloss>to unstitch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to solve</gloss>
+<gloss>to work out</gloss>
+<gloss>to answer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to dispel (misunderstanding, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to clear up</gloss>
+<gloss>to remove (suspicion)</gloss>
+<gloss>to appease</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to dissolve (a contract)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cancel</gloss>
+<gloss>to remove (a prohibition)</gloss>
+<gloss>to lift (a ban)</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise (a siege)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to release (from duty)</gloss>
+<gloss>to relieve</gloss>
+<gloss>to dismiss</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2063050">梳く・すく</xref>
+<gloss>to comb (out)</gloss>
+<gloss>to card</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

Add metaphorical sense
(Saw in literal sense on Buddhist poster – “Don’t deceive!”)

@@ -20,0 +20,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>in form Ａを欺くＢ</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be as ... as ... (e.g. "as bright as day", "as beautiful as a rose")</gloss>
+</sense>

Ordered on hits.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>靴紐</keb>
+<keb>靴ひも</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>靴ひも</keb>
+<keb>靴紐</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>靴ひも</keb>

I'm changing it to "poet". It occurs mainly in sayings, proverbs, etc. All 14 Tanaka sentences linked to it are for this sense.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

Should we lead with an arch sense?

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -27,1 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>I (or me)</gloss>
+<gloss>I</gloss>
+<gloss>me</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

yes.  it would be like saying "food" is a suffix in english because you can say "russian food", "italian food", etc.

No, no, no. It's "spouse" modifying "deduction"; not vice-versa.

@@ -20,1 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

Various examples (e.g., at GG5), like 扶養控除

Add [n-suf] – used for “… deduction” (spouse, children, etc.)

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

i think 'charmingly' reverses the intent.  if i 'look charmingly' at someone, then it is me who is doing the charming, not the person i am looking at.  definitely hard to gloss for all possible translations.

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>charming</gloss>
-<gloss>fascinating</gloss>
-<gloss>bewitching</gloss>
-<gloss>captivating</gloss>
+<gloss>admiringly</gloss>
+<gloss>with fascination</gloss>
+<gloss>with adoration</gloss>
+<gloss>with enchantment</gloss>

The trouble  is that 惚れ惚れ doesn't mean "charming", etc. That's ほれぼれするような or just ほれぼれする... We need to have the gloss match the POS is possible. "charmingly?".

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ほれぼれ

As in the example sentence, this can have a stronger meaning than "fondly; charming"

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>fascinating</gloss>
+<gloss>bewitching</gloss>
+<gloss>captivating</gloss>

koj also

vs, but not noun

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5 koj daij
wiki(Urtica thunbergiana) jwiki(イラクサ)
eol

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>nettle (Urtica thunbergiana)</gloss>
+<gloss>Urtica thunbergiana (species of stinging nettle)</gloss>

Moi non plus.

nikk
おいら【蕁麻】
〔名〕植物「いらくさ（刺草）」の古名。

absolutely no idea why oik is used here

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<re_inf>&oik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daijr (splits)

@@ -32,0 +33,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -33,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>present</gloss>

Probably.

nikk (assuming archaic - [ok]?)

@@ -22,0 +22,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゆわい</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

daijs,nikk

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>斎</keb>

４ （斎う）身を慎み、けがれを避けて神を祭る。
「祝部(はふり)らが―・ふ社のもみち葉も標縄(しめなは)越えて散るといふものを」〈万・二三〇九〉
５ （斎う）神の力を借りて守る。

the way that i read daijs is the other way around.  (i.e., 祝う applies to all senses except 4&5, whereas 斎う applies to all senses)

koj has these headwords merged together (斎う leads) with no restrictions/comments.  (however, it does have restrictions in its entry for いわい 【斎・祝】)

we have いわい entries merged without restriction, so i'd say we can leave this one be at least for now

gg5, daij

Added senses.
I don't think 斎う belongs here. In daijr it's a separate entry (with different definitions). In daijs it only applies to archaic senses we don't have here. Take it out?

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to celebrate</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to celebrate</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to present (a gift) in celebration</gloss>
+<gloss>to drink in celebration</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to wish for (a happy future, good fortune, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pray for</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs, nikk

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>斎う</keb>

GG5 has three senses, but they seem similar to me.

daijr/koj

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かみがたぜえろく</reb>

I'll make it a note.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<s_inf>used by people in Edo</s_inf>
@@ -17,1 +18,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Edo term used to debase people from Kansai</gloss>

I think it's important to explain that it's a term used by people from Edo.

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">Edo term used to debase people from Kansai</gloss>

Daijr, Koj

Aligning glosses.

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>people of the Kansai area</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>people from Kansai</gloss>

23k googits

Found this written another way.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神わざ</keb>

OK.

koj, daijr, daijs, gg5, etc.

a number of problems here:
1) 'superhuman feat' in sense 1 is a duplicate of sense 2
2) the reading restrictions are unnecessary (koj has all readings having all meanings)
3) 'shinto ritual' is probably archaic for かみわざ, but is definitely not for しんじ
4) i don't think かみわざ is written as 神事 very much today, so the merge is very marginal
5) there are other readings that could be added to an entry for 神事[しんじ] that would make this entry even more cluttered
=====
i think しんじ should be split back out

@@ -23,4 +22,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しんじ</reb>
-<re_restr>神事</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -28,2 +23,0 @@
-<stagr>かみわざ</stagr>
-<stagr>かんわざ</stagr>
@@ -36,2 +29,0 @@
-<stagr>かみわざ</stagr>
-<stagr>かんわざ</stagr>
@@ -39,4 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>art, technique or skill worthy of the gods (esp. sports)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2816620">神事・しんじ</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Yes, a bit messy. Since かむわざ and かんわざ are pretty rare, I'm marking them "ok". I decided to bring in 神事/しんじ too as it goes straight through to sense 3.

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しんじ</reb>
+<re_restr>神事</re_restr>

I guess it won't hurt. Marginal.

@@ -23,0 +23,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

daijs for headword

could perhaps be two senses (as in meikyo)

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>前水</keb>

GG5, etc.

It's more the pond/lake than the water-spraying object.

@@ -18,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>garden pond</gloss>
+<gloss>miniature lake</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>miniature lake</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom
打ち解け	169,093	90.3%	
うち解け	15,650	8.4%	
打解け	2,434	1.3%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +26,5 @@
-<gloss>to feel comfortable (with someone)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be unreserved</gloss>
+<gloss>to become unreserved</gloss>
+<gloss>to lower one's guard</gloss>
+<gloss>to become friendly (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel at ease</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a relaxed attitude (to)</gloss>

Was useful still in 1828, I guess
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/declare
To declare one's self, to throw off reserve and avow one's opinion; to show openly what one thinks, or which side he espouses.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=打ち解ける
打ち解ける
come [get, break, crawl] out of one's shell〈話〉（内気だった人が）

打ち解けるためのゲーム
ice-breaking game（初対面の人たちが）

（人）に打ち解ける
open up to

お互いに打ち解ける
feel comfortable with one another
open up to one another

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/打ち解ける
研究社 新和英中辞典での「打ち解ける」の英訳
うちとける 打ち解ける
be frank [open, candid] 《with somebody》

打ち解けて話す
have a friendly chat [heart‐to‐heart talk] 《with》
talk freely 《to》

打ち解けた調子で
in a chatty [familiar] tone
打ち解けない
be uncommunicative
be reserved
《口語》 be standoffish.

Interesting. Was juxtaposed with 心を開く (which I just edited as well), same meaning, mixing up vocab.

Same stubborn old woman, after trying to win her over:
このばあさん、全然心開かねえぞ。　1. "This old woman isn't opening her heart at all" 2."This old woman just refuses to open up"
1: If Himmel or Heiter were here, ... "半一くらいで打ち解けているはずなのに" "she would have opened up in half a day".
2: "Sorry, Himmel or Heiter could have gotten her to open up in half a day."

 
"to throw off reserve" appears to be quite well dated.  First non-dictionary result on google was a text from the mid-1800s.

1 result on all of reddit is a false-positive. no news results, no twitter results.

"frank" seems to be pointed at a no-longer-common connotation of the word.  I can be frank with someone who I don't like at all, and am totally uncomfortable being around(frank = direct-and-to-the-point. "let me be frank"). The weblio ref puts "frank" next to "open" (which I've added) and "candid" which is better, but also has connotation issues.  I think "unreserved", which hints at   打ち解けない = reserved, works better.

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>to open one's heart</gloss>
-<gloss>to throw off reserve</gloss>
-<gloss>to be frank</gloss>
+<gloss>to open up (to someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel comfortable (with someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unreserved</gloss>

EDR日英対訳辞書
20k hits

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うち解ける</keb>

daijr

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1462500">二人称</xref>

Bulk convert ling to gramm
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

daijr: 〔文法〕
gakken: 〔言語学・文法〕
smk: 〔文法で〕

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>

Thanks. That sentence was amended a couple of months ago. I have dropped it as an example.

daij, gg5

Not a noun.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>rough (e.g. sketch, approximation)</gloss>
+<gloss>rough (estimate, outline, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -26 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5

Dropped 大まかに, so making the adverbial version clearer.

@@ -21,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>general</gloss>
+<gloss>loose</gloss>

no way that the others refer to the anatomy of the hand

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<stagk>中手</stagk>

@@ -24,1 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>metacarpus (anatomy)</gloss>
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>metacarpus</gloss>

www5.atpages.jp/motoneuron/mobile/?内腔
https://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20171229-00010000-yomidr-sctch
www5.atpages.jp/motoneuron/mobile/?腔

The first two links give "ないくう" as the sole reading.

As explained in the 3rd link: "「腔」の字を、「こう」でなく「くう」と読む読み方は、辞書には載っていないが、医学の分野でだけ習慣的に使われている読み方"

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ないくう</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>lumen (anatomical)</gloss>
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>lumen</gloss>

e.g., not the unit of luminous flux

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>lumen</gloss>
+<gloss>lumen (anatomical)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 巴　　 | 445,522 | 99.5% |
| 鞆絵　 |   2,075 |  0.5% | <- daijs, koj
| ともえ | 200,061 |  N/A  |

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>heraldic design composed of two or more interlocked comma-shaped figures</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">heraldic design composed of two or more interlocked comma-shaped figures</gloss>

Thanks

Gotcha. Undoing.

@@ -22,6 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2243090">巴利語</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>Pali language</gloss>
-</sense>

This can't go here as it's nothing to do with the ともえ reading. If it's to go in an entry, it needs its own, with a パ or ぱ reading. 巴利 is an ateji.

The consensus on the mailing list seems to be that this is not the place for (historical) gikun unless they pass some kind of objective criterion, e.g., inclusion in a major dictionary.  As pointed out, Google usually overestimates the number of hits in any case.

Rejecting the proposed changes.

I have joined the JMdict/Edict Yahoo group as you have 
suggested. Should I just start a conversation there on 
this topic? Before I do so, I just want to make sure you 
are aware that 文語訳(明治訳)舊約聖書 is a regularly quoted 
from version of this early Japanese translation of The 
Bible. As you probably know The Bible is one of the most 
quoted from pieces of literature and this translation is 
no exception. You should literally be getting hundreds of 
google hits when searching for the gikun I am proposing. 
The reason you are not has to do with how you are 
searching. For example, when you searched for 曠空い 
(proposed on another branch) you must have searched as 
"曠空い" when you should have searched "曠空(むなし)" or 
even "曠空(むな)" which will generate hundreds of matches. 
I would not include the い ending because that may be 
changed depending upon how the word is used. When you 
search for a gikun reading like the one I am proposing 
here, you should search "淵(わだ)". Doing your search 
this way, you will find that there are over 300 pages in 
your search results. That is because when uncommon gikun 
is used, the kana will be shown in parentheses after the 
kanji in most cases (unless rubi is utilized). Feel free 
to respond to this here, or I'll move the conversation to 
the yahoo JMDict/Edict group conversation board.

restoring proposed change. however, i do not approve of it without further evidence that this is not just an idiosyncratic choice of a single translator

@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>わだ</reb>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -24,0 +30,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
@@ -25,0 +34 @@
+<s_inf>わだ, referring to the sea (the deep), is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>

in my opinion, a single source is not adequate evidence for the addition of the alleged gikun

please discuss the addition of these gikun readings on the mailing list
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/edict-jmdict/info
===
i am temporarily rejecting this amendment to approve a change in xref type (瀬 is not really an antonym)

@@ -23,5 +22,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>わだ</reb>
-<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -30,6 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1374360">瀬・1</xref>
-<s_inf>わだ, referring to the sea (the deep), is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1374360">瀬・1</xref>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>わだ referring to the sea (the deep) is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>
+<s_inf>わだ, referring to the sea (the deep), is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>depths (e.g. of despair, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>depths (e.g. of despair)</gloss>

I note the JEs use kana for examples.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 淵 │ 825,048 │ 77.2% │
│ 潭 │  57,985 │  5.4% │
│ 渊 │   1,348 │  0.1% │
│ 渕 │ 184,764 │ 17.3% │
╰─ー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<keb>渕</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,3 +18 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>渕</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

in my opinion, a single source is not adequate evidence for the addition of the alleged gikun

please discuss the addition of these gikun readings on the mailing list
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/edict-jmdict/info
===
i am temporarily rejecting this amendment to approve a change in xref type (瀬 is not really an antonym)

@@ -23,5 +22,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>わだ</reb>
-<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -30,6 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1374360">瀬・1</xref>
-<s_inf>わだ, referring to the sea (the deep), is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1374360">瀬・1</xref>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201190">海・わだ・1</xref>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>わだ referring to the sea (the deep) is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>
+<s_inf>わだ, referring to the sea (the deep), is an obsolete gikun reading for 淵 found in Meiji period literature</s_inf>

OK.

262 'real' google hits, but the overwhelming majority are edict-derived word lists.  no support in any other dic, inc. eijiro.  i don't think this should be an entry

The expression is normally used only in city council, parliament, court house and similar places.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>admission free</gloss>
+<gloss>admission free, with open doors</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>the United States of America</gloss>
+<gloss>United States of America</gloss>

Daijr: 「ほんとう（本当）」の転。会話語として使われる。

I'm comfortable leaving off the tag. It's pronunciation vs reading.

it's not irregular

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

No need for [nokanji] if it's already [sk]

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

OK, flipping it back. I'll reopen for a bit.
Ditto for 本当に.

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+<reb>ほんと</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +26,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホント</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

I think the previous glosses were OK. The extras and reordering don't seem to be supported by that reference.

@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>excessively</gloss>
-<gloss>too much</gloss>
-<gloss>immoderately</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>blindly</gloss>
@@ -22 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>blindly</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>excessively</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>extremely</gloss>
-<gloss>terribly</gloss>
@@ -32 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>excessive</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>excessive</gloss>

スーパー大辞林
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/矢鱈/#je-76322

added definitions

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>excessively</gloss>
+<gloss>too much</gloss>
+<gloss>immoderately</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>at random</gloss>
@@ -19 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>at random</gloss>
@@ -22 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>excessively</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>excessive</gloss>
@@ -30 +34,0 @@
-<gloss>excessive</gloss>

矢鱈	14382
やたら	3320728

@@ -7 +7 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

afaict, daijs splits by PoS.  which is also what daijr and gg5 do.  (though gg5 still glosses sense 1 as adverbs for some reason.)  koj, meikyo, shinmeikai and my other waeis only have one sense.

makes sense to me.  also allows us to delete that note

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. adverb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indiscriminately</gloss>
+<gloss>blindly</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>recklessly</gloss>
-<gloss>impulsively</gloss>
+<gloss>excessively</gloss>
+<gloss>profusely</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>excessively</gloss>
-<gloss>profusely</gloss>
+<gloss>indiscriminate</gloss>
+<gloss>random</gloss>
+<gloss>excessive</gloss>

mk (1 sense)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijs

@@ -20,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>subordinate</gloss>
+<gloss>underling</gloss>
+</sense>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, koj

I don't think "esp." is needed.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>death (esp. nobleman, aristocrat)</gloss>
+<gloss>death (of a nobleman, Imperial family member, etc.)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>death (of emperor or nobleman of a certain rank)</gloss>
+<gloss>death (esp. nobleman, aristocrat)</gloss>

daijs

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>death</gloss>
+<gloss>death (of emperor or nobleman of a certain rank)</gloss>

duplicate

Tagging obsolete kana and kanji usage for 
reading おれ

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

OK

not sure [expl] is really appropriate here.  should be a note?  and the [male] tag should cover the 'not usually used by women' part

@@ -42,0 +42,1 @@
+<s_inf>sounds rough or arrogant</s_inf>
@@ -44,1 +45,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">rough or arrogant-sounding first-person pronoun, usually not used by women in modern times</gloss>

nikk

simplified expl

@@ -30,0 +30,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おらあ</reb>
+<re_restr>俺</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おり</reb>
+<re_restr>俺</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -36,1 +44,1 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">rough or arrogant-sounding first-person pronoun, not used by women in modern times except for certain remote areas</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">rough or arrogant-sounding first-person pronoun, usually not used by women in modern times</gloss>

fork

Suggesting that 己 is an irregular kanji for this entry 
(would normally be used for おのれ only). Also suggesting 
restricted and obsolete kana usages

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>俺</re_restr>
+<re_restr>己</re_restr>
@@ -33,0 +36 @@
+<re_restr>己</re_restr>
@@ -38,0 +42 @@
+<re_restr>己</re_restr>

Suggest tagging 己 as iK for this entry

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

tagged which kana and kanji are obsolete for 
the headword.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

OK

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 俺が　 │ 4,651,412 │ 86.6% │
│ オレが │   720,558 │ 13.4% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オレ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

My bad, covered in the 乃公【だいこう】 entry.

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>乃公</keb>

daijs

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乃公</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Could probably be split.

NHK's 2016 accent dictionary has two separate entries for 位. One is "順位など," which only has さんい, and the other is "旧官位," which has both さんい and さんみ.

The kokugos all prefer さんみ for the court and trinity senses.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>third rank (e.g. in sports, at the Japanese court, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>esp. さんい</s_inf>
@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+<gloss>third rank</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. さんみ</s_inf>
+<gloss>third rank (in the Japanese court system)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +27 @@
+<s_inf>esp. さんみ</s_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>third rank (e.g. in sports , at the Japanese court, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>third rank (e.g. in sports, at the Japanese court, etc.)</gloss>

Both example sentences are for sports.

Broadening sense 1. I guess it could be split.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>third rank (in the Japanese court system)</gloss>
+<gloss>third rank (e.g. in sports , at the Japanese court, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>third place</gloss>

gg5
notes based on koj and meikyo

i see no support for どうけん

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>道管</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうけん</reb>
@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 導管</s_inf>
@@ -17,1 +18,9 @@
-<gloss>duct (anatomy)</gloss>
+<gloss>pipe</gloss>
+<gloss>duct</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<s_inf>esp. 道管</s_inf>
+<gloss>vessel</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Just "inheriting" was rather misleading.

@@ -25,0 +25,3 @@
+<gloss>taking over</gloss>
+<gloss>handing over</gloss>
+<gloss>transfer of control</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>passing on the baton</gloss>

The refs are inconsistent about whether the first sense is [vi] or [vt]. Iwakoku and sankoku have it tagged as both.

Marcus commented on GitHub:
>> I think hiding away the type of rare or obscure kanji that are still included in one or two kokugos with [sK] rather than tagging them as [rK] can lead to confusion

This seems to be one such entry. I don't think there are too many others.

In addition to meikyo, "胎む" is also recorded in kanjipedia and gendai reikai. I don't think there's a problem with making it [rK].

You can find even more kanji forms (胚む・娠む・姙む・肧む) for this word if you look through various kanwas. I think we have to draw a line somewhere.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 孕む　 │ 28,853 │ 99.6% │
│ 妊む　 │     53 │  0.2% │ - rK (daijs, meikyo, gg5)
│ 胎む　 │     63 │  0.2% │ - add, sK (only meikyo)
│ はらむ │ 35,366 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>胎む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think that "rule" only applies when the examples act as an extension of the gloss (as in sense 3). Something like "作品: work (e.g. book, film, composition)" is fine.

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<gloss>to be swollen and ripe (plant ear, head, sprout, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be swollen and ripe (of a plant ear, head, sprout, etc.)</gloss>

Agree. Not needed. I'll update やたら.

に form of な adjective やたら 1537780
(Note that this is listed as (P) common, so perhaps deletion requires updating (P) database?)

Done.

should perhaps be merged with current entry for 神事/かみわざ as 
daijs 2nd sense for かみわざ is 神事/しんじ. the same kanji can 
also be read かみごと which also both means ritual and 
superhuman feat

GG5, etc.

Making it clearer.

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>tax deduction</gloss>
+<gloss>deduction from taxable income</gloss>

"work" is enamdict

[work]: name of a sutra

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&work;</misc>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>the Lotus Sutra</gloss>
+<gloss>Lotus Sutra</gloss>

* [fld=Buddh]
* [abbr]
* link to long form

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

daijr, ルミナス (both have ほっけきょう)

https://kotobank.jp/word/法華経-132828#E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.9E.97.20.E7.AC.AC.E4.B8.89.E7.89.88
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/204512/meaning/m0u/法華経/

Added another 読み方

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほっけきょう</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>the Lotus Sutra</gloss>
+<gloss>Lotus Sutra</gloss>

* [fld=Buddh]
* [abbr]
* link to long form

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>capillary (anatomical)</gloss>
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>capillary</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/妙法

Add Buddhist senses (and technical Sanskrit – it’s a variant on “dharma”)

@@ -15,0 +15,14 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>marvelous law of Buddha</gloss>
+<gloss>Saddharma</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1910900">妙法蓮華経</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>Lotus Sutra</gloss>
+<gloss>teachings of the Lotus Sutra</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5 daijs

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&hon;</misc>

Another take on it.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

"Sutra on the Lotus of the Marvelous Law" gets 16 google hits, most of which are crud
ddofbud has as 'Sutra of the Lotus of the Wonderful Dharma', which gets 53 hits
wikipedia has "Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma" which gets at least 100 real hits (google claims 5500)

i can't see anything "incorrect" about glossing it using the name by which it is called in english as opposed to literal names that have no currency in english at all

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1805340">法華経</xref>
@@ -15,2 +14,2 @@
-<misc>&work;</misc>
-<gloss>Sutra on the Lotus of the Marvelous Law</gloss>
+<gloss>Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma</gloss>
+<gloss>Lotus Sutra</gloss>

* [work]: name of a sutra
* Link to abbreviated name, rather than (incorrectly) gloss 
(this is a long name!)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1805340">法華経</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&work;</misc>
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>Lotus Sutra</gloss>

daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仮導管</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<field>&bot;</field>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

i see no support for this

@@ -13,4 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そなた</reb>
-<re_restr>汝</re_restr>
-</r_ele>

Entry created

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>burr (e.g.chestnut)</gloss>
+<gloss>burr (e.g. chestnut)</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

All my refs lead with "bur(r)". also GG5 writes it just in kana.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>(chestnut) cupule</gloss>
-<gloss>burr</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>burr (e.g.chestnut)</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(chestnut) case</gloss>
+<gloss>cupule</gloss>
+<gloss>case</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj
en:WP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chestnut#Description
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calybium_and_cupule

Split off かさ "(pine) cone" sense – diff reading and meaning
alt kanji
[fld=bot]
formal name – note that “burr” is ambiguous/misleading, as suggests hooks; “cupule” is formal name.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>梂</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かさ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>(chestnut) cupule</gloss>
@@ -18,1 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>(pine) cone</gloss>

Entry created

新和英中辞典 (折れる entry: "snap (ぼきっと)"
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/minami-no-neko/touch/searchdiary?word=*[�����]  (...ぼきっと (snap) おれずに...)

ポキッと - 339k hits 
ぽきっと - 53k hits
ぼきっと - 11k hits
Clear that ぼきっと is being used the same way.

@@ -5,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>ポキッと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぼきっと</reb>

Entry created

OK

Instead of a separate 梳く/とく entry, we could simply have a "also written as 梳く" note on corresponding 解く sense (and 梳く as an sK form). This is what the kokugos do.
I don't see the need for a separate "comb"/"brush" sense. Sankoku has a third sense ("歯のこまかなくしで、髪の毛のふけやごみを取る") but it's not in the other refs. Brian notes on 2215390 that it's probably rare/historical.

@@ -22,7 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to comb (hair)</gloss>
-<gloss>to brush</gloss>

Proposed split.  See discussion at 2215390 (髪を梳く). I think 漉く can go.

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>漉く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>とく</reb>
-<re_restr>梳く</re_restr>
@@ -21 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1198890">解く・とく・7</xref>
@@ -24,0 +16,13 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to thin (hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reduce in volume</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>to comb (hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to brush</gloss>

I think it's Ok with an "iK" tag.

is this common enough to be worth recording?  i think it's just a henkan error, and i count about 30 real google hits for "毛を漉く" and 60 for "髪を漉く".

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本語の一人称代名詞#おら（俺ら）
meikyo: 現代では方言的

This is still used in certain dialects.
I don't think we need rK tags on an archaic/dialectal entry like this.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +23 @@
+<s_inf>dialectal in contemporary Japanese</s_inf>

199 sentences indexed to 俺. I think I've locked them to the おれ reading.

fine as kanji with rK?

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺ら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
@@ -21 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written 俺 and 俺ら</s_inf>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/おんどれ

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<dial>&osb;</dial>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

none of my sources have おんどら or the dialect note

@@ -13,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おんどら</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,1 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -20,1 +16,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1266890">おのれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1266890">おのれ・3</xref>
@@ -22,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>(insulting) you (Hyougo Banshu dialect)</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>you</gloss>

This is a fork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not and could not be used as cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

To work better with the ken'nata entry

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting (often with a rectangular blade)</gloss>

I don't think the "type of" contributes anything.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

I'm fine either way, though I lean towards just having the description.

I'm not a big fan of "type of..." expl glosses as the only gloss. I think it's better to include the Japanese term first in entries like 
these.
(I wouldn't mind "nata knife" or "nata machete" but "nata" by itself is perhaps "cleaner")

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

Daijr says フェチ is a col. abbr for フェティシズム, and GG5 refers to it, but it could equally well be an abbrev. of フェティッシュ.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2036830">フェティッシュ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1109850">フェティシズム</xref>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>whatever way</gloss>
+<gloss>any way</gloss>
+<gloss>either way</gloss>
@@ -14 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>either way</gloss>

daijs/nikk: ［副］

Please also align 「どうとでも」.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

separate entry