"coup d'etat" suggests success.  AFAIK, this term does not.  all J-E sources have 'riot'

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>coup d'état</gloss>
+<gloss>riot</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/一揆

ja:WP has a long discussion of shades of meaning and English translation (as “riot, revolt”), which may be worth reading carefully (I took a look at it but not esp. carefully).

* Elaborate – esp. Japanese historical, a *revolt*
(Dicts note “Japanese”, though not exclusively Japanese – also used to translate German “Putsch”, as in ミュンヘン一揆)
* Not “riot” except in very broad sense of the word, hence remove as misleading
* Also, remove articles (“a, an”)
(Local bar is called 一揆, hence interest in term.)

@@ -16,2 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>(a) riot</gloss>
-<gloss>an insurrection</gloss>
+<gloss>uprising (esp. in Japan since middle ages, e.g. peasant uprising)</gloss>
+<gloss>revolt</gloss>
+<gloss>insurrection</gloss>
+<gloss>putsch</gloss>
+<gloss>coup d'état</gloss>

Just に form of 円滑 – delete.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/軍隊の編制#部隊の単位

I should have looked a little harder before removing this sense.

@@ -31,0 +32,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>counter for military units</gloss>

I think using a normal-sized ケ for 個(こ) is non-standard.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<reb>ケ</reb>
+<reb>ヶ</reb>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<reb>ヶ</reb>
+<reb>ケ</reb>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<s_inf>also written as ヶ or ケ</s_inf>
+<s_inf>also written as ヶ</s_inf>

From deleted 2220325.

@@ -19,0 +20,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヶ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>also written as ヶ or ケ</s_inf>

Yes!

ENAMDICT

I have no idea why that would be included in sense 2 about hospitality.  I think the current sense 1 covers it

GG5

Add note on faith, piousness
(Saw at shrine today, written as 篤い (or rather 篤く))

@@ -33,0 +33,1 @@
+<gloss>deep (religious faith, piousness)</gloss>

G n-grams
突き出る	11633
突出る	168
つき出る	132
突きでる	90
つきでる	315

adding form

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>突きでる</keb>

Daijr (has 突出る).

Saw つき出る in text.

@@ -8,0 +8,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>突出る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つき出る</keb>

mk

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>thinking over something</gloss>
+<gloss>thinking over (something)</gloss>

eij
n-grams
を反芻して	937
を反すうして	46

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>反すう</keb>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

Rumination is not strictly "chewing like a cow".

@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>rumination (chewing like a cow)</gloss>
+<gloss>rumination</gloss>
+<gloss>regurgitation</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>rumination (thinking about a subject)</gloss>
-<gloss>thinking over</gloss>
+<gloss>turning over in one's mind</gloss>
+<gloss>thinking over something</gloss>
+<gloss>pondering</gloss>
+<gloss>musing</gloss>
+<gloss>rumination (about a subject)</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* Fix POS (both have [n] & [vs])
* Clarify glosses – specifically “rumination” in both English senses
(Saw at museum; reading of 芻 as すう took some guessing by Japanese – it’s pretty rare)

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>rumination (chewing like a cow)</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>rumination</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to ruminate on</gloss>
-<gloss>to think over</gloss>
+<gloss>rumination (thinking about a subject)</gloss>
+<gloss>thinking over</gloss>

Why? No reference was given. AFAICT it does not mean "voicemail". No EJ dictionary I can find gives this as the Japanese for "voicemail", which is not surprising.

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see">留守番電話</xref>
@@ -15,1 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>answering machine, voice mail</gloss>
+<gloss>answering machine</gloss>
+<gloss>answerphone</gloss>

I added the word "voice mail"

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1552810">留守番電話</xref>
+<xref type="see">留守番電話</xref>
@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>answering machine</gloss>
+<gloss>answering machine, voice mail</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to haunt</gloss>
+<gloss>to torment</gloss>

daijr, daijs, prog, Luminous

@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to cause a bad result</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring about a negative outcome</gloss>
+</sense>

蟋蟀	9,055	3.6%	
蛩	319	0.1%	
蛬	180	0.1%			
こおろぎ	107,628	42.3%	
コオロギ	136,992	53.9%

I don't think the arch sense is needed.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,5 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>any insect that chirps in autumn</gloss>

-蛼 cannot be handled
-you should know how to format these entries by now, with respect to katakana last, nokanji, etc., etc.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +13,1 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>蛼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,1 +16,1 @@
-<reb>コオロギ</reb>
+<reb>こおろぎ</reb>
@@ -20,1 +19,2 @@
-<reb>こおろぎ</reb>
+<reb>コオロギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -25,1 +25,1 @@
-<gloss>cricket (Gryllidae)</gloss>
+<gloss>cricket (Gryllidae spp.)</gloss>

koj & shinkaisan list 蟋蟀；蛼
ja:WP lists 蟋蟀；蛬；蛩；蛼
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コオロギ

12,600,000 蟋蟀 – though can also mean キリギリス
 3,030,000 コオロギ
 2,140,000 こおろぎ
 1,370,000 蛩
   289,000 蛬
   124,000 蛼

* Add katakana – more common
* Add more kanji
(BTW, this is one of those おお exception – it’s こおろぎ, not the expected こうろぎ; this phonetic misspelling is pretty rare, so I haven’t noted them; I don’t think we’re doing these systematically, right?)

@@ -7,0 +7,12 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蛩</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蛬</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蛼</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コオロギ</reb>
+</r_ele>

If だ can be tagged "cop" then this can. I'm not a fan of regarding either 
as a copula; it's not Latin.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&cop;</pos>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>polite copula</s_inf>

Can't we use "cop" for the PoS here? I don't think the fact that it's a polite form makes it any less of a copula.
I don't think the であります x-ref is needed.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref>

restoring lost xref

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref>

we usually treat polite forms of verbs as [exp]

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008340">である</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref>

weird.  the test i've been using to see if a kanji can make it into the dictionary or not is to just copy-paste it into the kanjidic search with the JIS 212 box checked.  but i guess that doesn't always work

http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/cgi-bin/wwwjdic.cgi?1MKU550e
I can find it other ways - こえ reading, Bushu #30 and 10 strokes, etc.

is it JIS 212?  because it doesn't show up in a kanjidic search on Monash with the JIS 212 kanji box checked.

唎 is OK. It's JIS X 0212. It won't show up in the old EDICT.
That said, I'm surprised about 唎 being there. Is it just because it looks like 利? (the kanji are quite unrelated.) For that matter, what is the etymology of 利き酒? 聞き酒 sort-of makes sense.

@@ -21,0 +21,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>唎き酒</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>唎酒</keb>
+</k_ele>

my google hits don't match yours.  make sure you set google to limit to japanese hits only, use quotation marks around the search term and add a の to the search for good measure
利き酒 = 1,270,000
きき酒 = 756,000
利酒 = 193,000
聞き酒 = 16,900
聞酒 = 5,090

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>利酒</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16,1 +13,1 @@
-<keb>聞酒</keb>
+<keb>利酒</keb>
@@ -20,0 +17,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞酒</keb>

Koj, Daij, GG5

No mention of translation.

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Japanese translation of Buddhist hymns of praise</gloss>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>hymns of praise in Japanese</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs.  itaiji

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>和讃</keb>
+</k_ele>

Yes, it was a bit off.

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>with a click</gloss>
-<gloss>with a snap</gloss>
-<gloss>snapping a picture</gloss>
+<gloss>(with a) click (e.g. camera shutter)</gloss>
+<gloss>(with a) snap</gloss>

Daijirin, Daijisen, Kenkyusha 5th Edition,
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?p=ぱちり&stype=0&dtype=0

I have not found the previous definitions "quickly, suddenly" in any other dictionary.

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>quickly</gloss>
-<gloss>suddenly</gloss>
+<gloss>with a click</gloss>
+<gloss>with a snap</gloss>
+<gloss>snapping a picture</gloss>

Have seen it this way too.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パチリ</reb>

Entry created

align with 2654250

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>has</gloss>
-<gloss>have</gloss>
+<gloss>did</gloss>
+<gloss>(have) done</gloss>

I don't think it's indicating a question; it's more of an abbreviation of ですか. (We 
wouldn't split an entry like this.)

I might be wrong but is だ sometimes used to indicate a question？ see  phrases like だれだ？ どこだ？
I see the argument that these are just examples sense 1, "be, is" but I'm not really sure that's the case.
Not for example how だ can not be followed by か (while verbs, na-adjectives, i-adjectives, nouns, can all come before a "か")
e.g. X だれだか？X どこだか？ 
on the other hand X お前だ？  doesn't work as a question. so if it's a "question particle", it's only with interrogatives.
Btw shouldn't senses 2 & 3 be a separate entry, maybe together with た?

This has been replaced by [sk] readings and notes in other entries.

Aligning.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>counter for articles</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for (small) things or pieces</gloss>

OK, I'm with Robin. I'll put it back. I'll use "pronounced" (as with は) instead of "read".

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ヶ</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ケ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11 +5 @@
-<reb>か</reb>
+<reb>ヶ</reb>
@@ -14,4 +8 @@
-<reb>が</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こ</reb>
+<reb>ケ</reb>
@@ -20 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>か</stagr>
@@ -22,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced か</s_inf>
@@ -27 +17,0 @@
-<stagr>こ</stagr>
@@ -29,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced こ</s_inf>
@@ -33 +23,0 @@
-<stagr>が</stagr>
@@ -35,0 +26 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced が</s_inf>

I'm not comfortable with it. I prefer the old way but with kana in the notes instead of romaji.

It would be a bold move. I'm not sure about putting solo kana in the "Kanji" purely on the grounds that their pronunciation is irregular.
Two other comments:
- if we take this path the entry needs to be split into 3 as it would be breaking the 2/3 rule;
- to be consistent, the は entry should be converted to "は [わ} (prt) ......"
I'm inclined to leave it alone.

OK I guess.

ngrams 
じゃないすか	90405

it's not really colloquial in the usual sense, since you'd 
still use it when speaking to somebody 目上.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>す</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,1 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -12,1 +14,1 @@
-<s_inf>colloquial copula</s_inf>
+<s_inf>semi-polite copula</s_inf>

synching with new entries for だ・です.  see comments on だ

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to be</gloss>
+<gloss>be</gloss>
+<gloss>is</gloss>

synching with です

@@ -11,1 +11,4 @@
-<gloss>col. form of desu</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>colloquial copula</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1088240">ＤＯＳ・ドス</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">Japanese-capable version of DOS</gloss>

meikyo, wiki

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＤＯＳ／Ｖ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>DOS-V</gloss>
+<gloss>DOS/V</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

daijs, 研究社 新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -18,0 +18,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<gloss>to be near (a certain age)</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5 splits this into 3 senses, but I think it is all rather figurative.

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to be able to afford(to have the means to buy something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to afford</gloss>
+<gloss>to have the means to buy</gloss>

Merged with 1157200.

-> real note

@@ -9,1 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>(suru verb ending) hard to do</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>suru verb ending</s_inf>
+<gloss>hard to do</gloss>

Entry created

I've gone through all the XX豊か in GG5. None of them are headwords/subheadwords. It's plain that XX豊か forms are common and productive. I think the best approach is to expand the 豊か entry to make this role clear.

~豊か can be added to many things.  not sure about this one

Not sure about "efficient"; "beneficial" seems OK.

395,000 results
www hits
printed material
"湯113年の歴史に裏付けられた効能豊かな温泉"
most but not all hits are about onsens (first hit is 効能豊かな
食用ココナッツオイル, for example)

merged into 2220325

ja:WP, en:WP
  (admittedly, I wrote much of the en:WP page, based on the ja:WP one)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヶ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_ke

Create separate entry for the が reading of ヶ; ケ
(Confusingly, it’s used both as counter (two ways) and as possessive, hence two entries.)

merged into 2220325

@@ -10,3 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>コ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1264740">個・こ・1</xref>

ja:WP en:WP
  (admittedly, I wrote much of en:WP, based on ja:WP)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヶ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_ke
http://www.sljfaq.org/afaq/small-ke.html

Third (and final) use of ヶ.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>the three highest ranks in a ministry: minister, vice minister and parliamentary secretary</gloss>
+<gloss>three highest ranks in a ministry: minister, vice minister and parliamentary secretary</gloss>

daijs, 新語時事用語辞典, 百科事典マイペディア

has a wikipedia redirect page and an eijiro example sentence. 158,000 hits.

-Ben, please provide some form of reference, even if it is only along the lines of what I have included above.

-This is ~perhaps~ worth recording, although it is covered in the entry for ~調.

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I do not have a reference. I believe this is an approximately 
correct translation, and this is a useful word to add to the 
dictionary.

gg5, eij examples

not sure it needs to be an entry...

@@ -11,2 +11,5 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Disgraceful</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>disreputable</gloss>
+<gloss>scandalous</gloss>
+<gloss>disgraceful</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/je2/63654/m1u/人聞き/

daijr

no idea how to phrase this.  supplied refs contain only かくやあらん

@@ -4,3 +4,3 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かくあらん</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>斯くやあらん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>must be like this</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>it must be like this</gloss>

http://okwave.jp/qa/q1414533.html

http://www.weblio.jp/content/とやあ�
%89%E3%82%93

example: 地獄の窯の底はかくあらんといった暑さで、訪れる場合は早朝のうちに入り、
午前９時には脱出を開始せねば危険だ

G n-grams:
未解明な	6765
未解明の	8666

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>unclear</gloss>

not sure it's necessary.  perhaps good for e-j

eij, life, 日本語WordNet(英和), 日英・英日専門用語辞書

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/翼葉 (has DBCLS and Cross)
http://ameblo.jp/tachibana1/theme5-10003852448.html

First refs just have "wing".
Second has: "翼葉とは二段になっている葉の枝側のほうの葉です。"
I think it's important to bring in "leaf" somewhere.

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>wing of petiole</gloss>
-<gloss>petiole wing</gloss>
+<gloss>petiole wing (leaf)</gloss>

Unreferenced.　Google image search for the Japanese word and 
the English word will bring up images of the same thing. 
Sorry.

Daijs: やくざの一家を表す紋章。

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>A coat of arms for Yakuza</gloss>
+<gloss>yakuza coat of arms</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/代紋

gg5, luminous, genius

@@ -26,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>threatening voice</gloss>
-<gloss>threatening tone</gloss>
+<gloss>deep, threatening voice</gloss>
+<gloss>menacing tone</gloss>

ドスの効いた声	4,421	50.0%	
ドスの利いた声	2,687	30.4%	
どすの利いた声	636	7.2%	
どすのきいた声	418	4.7%	adding sK
どすの効いた声	254	2.9%	
どすのきいた声	418	4.7%

The forms don't have to be in strict frequency order. I've swapped どすの利いた声 and どすの効いた声 so that the pattern is 効-利-効-利.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>どすの効いた声</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -15,3 +18 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>どすの効いた声</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Please only paste in short examples from the n-grams. Putting in masses is no help to others and makes it harder to read.

ドスの効いた	10642	  
ドスの効いた声	4421	  
ドスの効いた低音	349	  
ドスの効いた低い声	254	  
ドスの効いた歌声	227	  
ドスの効いた迫力	90	  
ドスの効いたヴォーカル	86	  
ドスの効いた疾走感	84	  
ドスの効いた感じ	83	  
ドスの効いた音	83	  
ドスの効いた関西弁	76	  
ドスの効いた顔	59	  
ドスの効いたダミ声	50	  
ドスの効いたボーカル	50	  
ドスの効いた重低音	48	  
ドスの効いた演技	47	  
ドスの効いた低音が	44	  
ドスの効いたラップ	44	  
ドスの効いた唸り	44	  
ドスの効いた大声	42	  
ドスの効いたセリフ	41	  
ドスの効いた男	41	  
ドスの効いた唸り声	40	  
ドスの効いた歌い	37	  
ドスの効いた口調	36	  
ドスの効いた怒鳴り	36	  
ドスの効いたドラム	30	  
ドスの効いた目	28	  
ドスの効いたしゃべり	28	  
ドスの効いた超低音	28	  
ドスの効いた言葉	27	  
ドスの効いた歌声が	27	  
ドスの効いた歌い方	27	  
ドスの効いた名乗り	26	  
ドスの効いたシャウト	26	  
ドスの効いた歌声と	26	  
ドスの効いたしゃべり方	26	  
ドスの効いた次回予告	25	  
ドスの効いた名乗り声	24	  
ドスの効いた歌唱	24	  
ドスの効いた広島弁	23	  
ドスの効いた殺気	21	  
ドスの効いたリズム	21	  
ドスの効いた大声で	21	  
ドスの効いた歌	21	  
ドスの効いた脅し	20	  
ドスの効いた凄み	20

Since I now have a super-popular form, here is a list of things that are not 声。

Wiki(ヘアピン), Google image search

Yes.

@@ -15,4 +15,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1715760">見て見ぬ振り</xref>
-<gloss>pretending not to see something</gloss>
-<gloss>turning a blind eye to</gloss>
-<gloss>burying one's head in the sand</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1715760">見て見ぬふり</xref>
+<gloss>pretending not to see (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>turning a blind eye (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>closing one's eyes (to)</gloss>

Shouldn't this be [n]? I see Rene removed it in 2012

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見ぬふり</keb>
+</k_ele>

eij, gg5

reading is wrong

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>せいあせせい</reb>
+<reb>せいかんせい</reb>
@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>antiperspirant (na)</gloss>

http://www.cocone.jp/myenglish/word/dic/

@@ -10,0 +10,11 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うこつけい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウコッケイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウコツケイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,2 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>Silky Fowl</gloss>
-<gloss>Silkie</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>silky fowl</gloss>
+<gloss>silky</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/烏骨鶏

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to have a well-defined character (of video game, anime, etc. character)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a well-defined character (of a fictional character)</gloss>

daijs

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to stand out as an individual</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a well-defined character (of video game, anime, etc. character)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand out as a character</gloss>

daijs

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>stand out its character, trait etc.</gloss>
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>
+<gloss>to stand out as an individual</gloss>

The original was "microbrew beer". I like having some alternatives.

Were the additional glosses really 
necessary?

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>microbrew beer</gloss>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>boutique beer</gloss>

Covering all bases.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クラフト・ビール</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>craft beer</gloss>
+<gloss>boutique beer</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/クラフトビール

GG5

GG5 daijr koj
(daijr gives alt reading, w/ rendaku)

Legal term, heard on TV.

Daijr, Koj

Daijr hasn't 4 senses; it just splits the noun and する senses.

@@ -8,1 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +10,1 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>troubled</gloss>
-<gloss>bothered</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>bother</gloss>
+<gloss>confusion</gloss>
@@ -16,1 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -19,3 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>confused</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -23,9 +20,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>depressed</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>quarrel</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>depression</gloss>
+<gloss>gloom</gloss>
+<gloss>feeling sad</gloss>

daij

Could be improved.

Koj, Daijr

daijr

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>pontoon</gloss>

http://images.google.com/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&q=barge&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&biw=1024&bih=633&sei=SWCAT7j4FrL54QTarLzMBw
http://images.google.com/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&q=台船&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&biw=1024&bih=633&sei=A16AT_WMLaPf4QSlu5DpBw

koj, daijr, daijs

conjugates as a verb of some kind, but i can't figure out what the verb type would be.  koj calls v4s, daijr/daijs call it 動サ特活.  playing it safe with 'exp'

OK, closing.

Reopen.

GG5: どすのきいた声で in a deep, threatening voice.   (other JEs have it too.)

As I commented earlier, I'm not keen to break with the references and have a 和語 like this lead with katakana. I'll close it off to shorten the queue, and reopen it for a while in case anyone else wants to comment.
Possibly sense 2 can be adj-no?

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>from 脅す・おどす</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 脅す</s_inf>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2002480">どす黒い・どすぐろい</xref>

Carrying a knife　（image search for "ドスを持っいる" returns people with knives. So does "どすを持っいる", but the captions are all katakana ドス）:
短刀を持っ	818	61.9%
ドスを持っ	504	38.1% (this is not MS-DOS)
どすを持っ	0	0.0%

脅す sense:
ドスの効いた	10642	39.3%
ドスのきいた	7718	28.5%
ドスの利いた	6086	22.5%
どすの利いた	1372	5.1%
どすのきいた	808	3.0%
どすの効いた	482	1.8%

Wikipedia page on 短刀. ドス is used, どす is not.
また、昭和前期まで博徒やヤクザの伝統的な喧嘩道具に使用された粗製の短刀を隠語で「ドス」と称し、金に困った一部の包丁鍛冶などが作ったと言われている。ドスの中でも長い物（1尺8寸超）は特に“長ドス”と呼ばれる。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/短刀

Video: ドスと短刀って違うもの…？
Video title and *all* comments(a bunch) use katakana form
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIiedTCIgfM

Search どす 短刀, google asks:
Did you mean ドス 短刀?
Comp "どすと短刀" (2 hits) "ドスと短刀" (a couple pages)

Wikipedia disambiguation for DOS. ドス does not appear anywhere
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS

MS-DOS, ドス appears exactly once in the phonetic entry, and not even stand-alone: MS-DOS（エムエス-ディーオーエス、エムエスドス[2]）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

Same story for DOS alone. ディスクオペレーティングシステム（英語: Disk Operating System、DOS、ディーオーエス、ドス
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_(OS)

Summary - from what I can find, at least, it appears that [1] and [2] are far and away predominantly katakana. For [3], hiragana wins out, but not by a huge margin, and [see=どす黒い] removes that ambiguity. [4] is very different from the other terms, and has a restriction already.  Counts don't appear to be influenced significantly by DOS/MS-DOS. [2] generally dominates the other counts, [1] is relatively rare in general. (should these be re-ordered?). Note, for example, 短刀 gets a whole wikipedia page, on which ドス get's a short paragraph.

yourei examples are all (or almost all) 脅す　sense.

==
I changed the ドス /どす ordering after editing ドスのきいた.  I won't post the long list, but if you do an n-gram search for the top 10/100 entries for 
ドスの 
and
どすの
You'll see that first, the list is absolutely overwhelmed by the 脅す meaning(using 効かす・利かせる and even the mistaken 聞かせる), and second,  ドス is the dominant form.
ドスを and　どすを are similarly overwhelmed by a grammatical variation of the same structure.

For the knife, while even sankoku lists primarily under どす, I suspect this is a reflection of it being a "native" and historical Japanese word. I don't know if they would ever handle such a case with ドス(「どす」とも書く).

It actually appears rare that ms-dos was written as　ドス. the wikipedia page for ドス doesn't even list DOS or MS-DOS as disambiguation options. Google "ドスソフト" or "ドス・ソフト" or "ドスのソフト" and you get almost nothing. Replace with "DOSソフト" or "DOSのソフト" or "MS-DOSソフト" and you'll get results. It seems the trendy thing for Japanese people to do might have been to use the English acronym, like DVD etc.

I'm not convinced ドス should lead. The JEs don't have it and most kokugos don't mention it. I think it's possibly noise from DOS.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ドス</reb>
+<reb>どす</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>どす</reb>
+<reb>ドス</reb>
@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1238070">脅す・おどす</xref>
-<s_inf>derivation of 脅す・おどす</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1238070">脅す</xref>
+<s_inf>from 脅す・おどす</s_inf>

どすをきかす Is not needed.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どすをきかす</reb>

ドスを利かす	49	26.6%
ドスをきかす	46	25.0%
ドスを効かす	89	48.4%
どすを効かす	0	0.0%
どすをきかす	0	0.0%

Add 効 form, remove [uk].

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ドスを効かす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドスをきかす</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

sankoku
どすを利かす（句）
凄みのある話し方や態度などで相手を恐れさせる


利かせる form
ドスをきかせて	570	55.2%
ドスを利かせて	333	32.2%
どすをきかせて	49	4.7%
どすを利かせて	35	3.4%

ドスをきかせる	144	55.8%
ドスを利かせる	114	44.2%
どすをきかせる	0	0.0%
どすを利かせる	0	0.0%


利かす form
ドスをきかして	46	4.5%
ドスを利かして	0	0.0%
どすを利かして	0	0.0%
どすをきかして	0	0.0%

Reconciling 利かす and 利かせる

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>どすを利かす</keb>
+<keb>ドスを利かす</keb>
@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2857510">ドスを利かせる・ドスをきかせる</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

nikk, gg5

koj, daij, gg5, prog

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/土一揆

It's a general term.

Current gloss reads like it could refer to any uprising during the Muromachi period, but I'm assuming this is a single historical 
event that's being referred to

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

koj, daij, gg5

https://www.japanese-wiki-corpus.org/history/Kuni ikki (provincial uprising).html

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>provincial revolt</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

630k hits

@@ -11,1 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>n voucher</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>voucher</gloss>
+<gloss>coupon</gloss>

http://www.ageconcern-japan.org/event/U3A/cal/hyousi04.pdf

voucher (seems to be synonym of coupon in [ミール]クーポン)

Syntax Error

補助券
ほじょけん
[1] n voucher (seems to be synonym of coupon in [ミール]クーポン)
                                                        ^

Koj, Daijr, Daijs, GG5

All 3 kokugos have でず; GG5 has です. Daijs has 出州, and GG5 xrefs it to 出洲.