@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>that gentleman (lady)</gloss>
+<gloss>that gentleman</gloss>
+<gloss>that lady</gloss>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

never mind, missed that it's in daijs

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>彼の方</keb>

is this more than the sum of あの+方?

wiki

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アマゴ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,1 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>red-spotted masu trout</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2636250">皐月鱒</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>land-locked variety of red-spotted masu trout (Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae)</gloss>

天魚 is definitely not in daijirin, even if you do the "を解説に含む" search.  koj does have it though.  these are all the same, i think

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>雨子</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

Hmmm. I can't see 天魚 anywhere in 大辞林. Both copies I use just have 甘子 for あまご. 広辞苑 has 天魚/あまご.
Just to be different, ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (which is new material to go in the next big Kenkyusha) has: あまご【甘子･雨子】 【魚】 〔サケ科の淡水魚〕 a cherry salmon; Oncorhynchus masou."
Are there many different あまごs? Or is everyone just terribly confused? (I am.) I not that there is no Wiki page for 甘子 or あまご.

daijr

Add alt kanji 天魚

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>天魚</keb>

It gets deleted in the JIS 208/212 versions, as it's JIS X 0213, but as it's not leaving a partial headword behind, there's no problem.

Let's see.

might the kanji work now?

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>𩺊</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あら</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -9,1 +16,1 @@
-<s_inf>kanji is U29E8A</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

It's older than EDICT POS tags. This one got its seqno in 1999, but I added most of the POS tags in 2000. Happy for it to go.

i suspect it is an E-J translation of an EDICT part-of-speech.  i don't think it's a real japanese PoS.

is this correct? most hits are "something somethingのある動詞," 
it seems. no dictionary hits outside of edict (at least not 
online)

not a typo.  "no, not at all" was the intent

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>no, not at all</gloss>
+<gloss>no</gloss>
+<gloss>not at all</gloss>

Almost all the 28 sentences are using it to mean "typical" and "characteristic". I assume this is sense 1.

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, DIJG

Sorry to reopen this but I think 4 senses is excessive. The kokugos and JEs have at most three (modern) senses; some only have two.
I got "emotive conviction" from Makino and Tsutsui's Dictionary of Intermediate Japanese Grammar. It has a good entry on this expression.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1205770">確かに・たしかに</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1375820">なる程・なるほど</xref>
@@ -18 +15 @@
-<s_inf>indicating agreement</s_inf>
+<s_inf>indicating emotive conviction</s_inf>
@@ -21,2 +18,10 @@
-<gloss>to be sure</gloss>
-<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>truly</gloss>
+<gloss>just (like)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>totally</gloss>
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
@@ -28,14 +33 @@
-<s_inf>indicating typical or characteristic</s_inf>
-<gloss>as you would expect</gloss>
-<gloss>just like</gloss>
-<gloss>vintage</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2820720">実に・じつに</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1394800">全く・まったく・1</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>indicating a high level</s_inf>
-<gloss>totally</gloss>
-<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicating agreement</s_inf>
@@ -43,12 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>very</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1376620">正しく・まさしく</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1394700">然も・さも・1</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>indicating certainty or conviction</s_inf>
-<gloss>surely</gloss>
-<gloss>no doubt</gloss>
-<gloss>clearly</gloss>
+<gloss>certainly</gloss>
+<gloss>for sure</gloss>

Bit of a struggle. Most were sense 2.

reopen as reminder (to someone) to reindex those tanaka sentences.  close if the reminder is unneeded/unwanted

i'm skeptical also.  safer to keep it out, i think

I think it's used all over the country.

http://www.weblio.jp/content/いじま�
%97%E3%81%84

全国大阪弁普及協会, 京ことば

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>

No response. I'm adding "huh?"  to sense 2 and closing it.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>huh?</gloss>
@@ -32,5 +32,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>うん</stagr>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>huh?</gloss>

I'm not happy with a new sense arriving like that without a reference or case. I'm tempted to remove it and ask アノニマスさん to resubmit with justification.
That said, I suspect that "huh?" could well belong in sense 2, along with "erm".

@@ -31,0 +32,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>うん</stagr>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>huh?</gloss>

pos/gloss agreement

@@ -30,3 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>moan</gloss>
-<gloss>groan</gloss>
-<gloss>grunt (of pain)</gloss>
+<s_inf>moan or groan (of pain)</s_inf>
+<gloss>oof</gloss>

fork

my bad, I think I looked at meikyo's うんこう entry without thinking. they don't have うんこ. but it has to be vi, I guess?

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

heard used in conversation about worthless cards (bewtween 2 Osakans in their 30's):
"うんこやな？"
"うん。"

@@ -19,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>crap</gloss>
+<gloss>trash</gloss>
+<gloss>garbage</gloss>
+</sense>

I'm inclined to agree that this sort of search key is best dealt with by the client software.

There's a tool here that attempts to decipher censored text such as う○こ:
http://fuseji.net/

Applications such as jisho.org also support regex wildcard searches. For example a search for "う?こ" will bring up all possible matches.
IMO, handling these sorts of forms seems outside the scope of jmdict's capabilities.

People look up all kinds of words using all kinds of tools like yomichan everything

I don't think "col" is needed. Children's language is colloquial by default.
I don't think う○こ should be included. All sorts of words can be censored using ○; I think it's unlikely that users would look up them. Also, ○ isn't kana. It would need to go in the kanji field but having an sK form as the only kanji form on an entry is problematic.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>う○こ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>poo</gloss>

self-approving

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001100">うんこ・1</xref>

My bad - should be vi, no?

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

"cack" was more my parents' generation. In my day "number two" and "big jobs" were common. 
For my grandkids it's usually "poo".

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>poo</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>poo</gloss>

おしっこ	807542
オシッコ	336828

http://www.akita-hinyoukika.jp/html/osikko2.html
https://www.kameihospital.com/publics/index/107/

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オシッコ</reb>

meikyo

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

〔幼児語〕小便。

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
@@ -15,4 +17,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>to urinate</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1007960">ちんちん・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1007960">ちんちん・1</xref>

as best as i can tell, it's not in any ref and is only really in 珍々豆, which is a snack.  should be removed

@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御珍々</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -16 +10,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

where is the kanji from though?? I can't find it anywhere 
and our ちんちん entry doesn't even list it. I mean it seems 
more to me like 夜露死苦 for よろしく than anything else and if 
that's the case, I don't think it belongs in this entry

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

has to be considered ateji since this is originally onomatopoeia

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1007960">ちんちん・3</xref>

only 2000 hits (a majority probably stemming from this entry)
not in daijr, daijs, wiki

@@ -6,3 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>雄珍々</keb>
@@ -17,0 +14,1 @@
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
@@ -18,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>penis (child)</gloss>
+<gloss>penis</gloss>

same as other entry, 追っかけ

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/追っか�
%91

I know they're in the examples, but by themselves they don't have the rather derogatory tone that おっさん implies. Best left off, I think.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>gramps</gloss>
-<gloss>pops</gloss>

Since this is a more informal word, these other definitions are more accurate and are even included in the example sentence which is why I added them as definitions.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>gramps</gloss>
+<gloss>pops</gloss>

K/M n-grams:

おっさん	58623
オッサン	26323

The kokugos doesn't call either sense abbreviations, but changes in pronunciation.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オッサン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Not sure it's really derog.

what was wrong with the original?  you can pick up the ingredients one at a time at 7-11.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>oden (various ingredients, such as egg, daikon, or konnyaku stewed in soy-flavored dashi)</gloss>
+<gloss>oden (Japanese dish consisting of various ingredients such as egg, daikon, konnyaku, etc.)</gloss>

御田	16307
お田	1851
おでん	2212718
おでんが	76219
お田が	No matches
御田が	166

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">dish of various ingredients, e.g. egg, daikon, potato, chikuwa, konnyaku, etc. stewed in soy-flavored dashi</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">dish of various ingredients, e.g. egg, daikon, potato, chikuwa, konnyaku stewed in soy-flavored dashi</gloss>

G n-grams:
おでん	2212718
御田	16307
お田	1851

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お田</keb>

Hosking (Dictionary of Japanese Food)

We seem to use "dish of ..." in many many entries. Hosking calls it "hodgepodge".

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>oden (Japanese dish of various ingredients, such as egg, daikon, or konnyaku stewed in soy-flavored dashi)</gloss>
+<gloss>oden</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">dish of various ingredients, e.g. egg, daikon, potato, chikuwa, konnyaku, etc. stewed in soy-flavored dashi</gloss>

Re: "what was wrong with the original?  you can pick up the 
ingredients one at a time at 7-11."

yes, but is oden "a bunch of ingredients" or "a dish"?

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -14,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>oden (various ingredients, such as egg, daikon, or konnyaku stewed in soy-flavored dashi)</gloss>
+<gloss>oden (Japanese dish of various ingredients, such as egg, daikon, or konnyaku stewed in soy-flavored dashi)</gloss>

https://furigana.info/w/屁

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

おなら	277203
オナラ	127902

OK, splitting.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<reb>へ</reb>
+<reb>オナラ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>usually 屁 is へ, and おなら is in kana</s_inf>
@@ -22,6 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>へ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>something worthless</gloss>
-<gloss>something not worth considering</gloss>

This should be two entries. It doesn't make sense to tag this as "uk" when へ is almost always written with kanji. Also, with the exception of koj, my refs don't even have kanji for おなら.

One wit said that lexicographers are divided into "splitters and clumpers". I'm fairly much in the clumper camp, which is probably why JMdict is the way it is.
That said, I agree that へ/おなら is a real borderline case, and is a shining example of the messiness of Japanese orthography. If there was a clean usage split between へ and おなら, e.g. one was always polite/clinical and the other was always col/vulg, I'd put them in different senses with comments to indicate usage, but it seems both are used in both applications.
On balance I think they should stay in the one entry.

GG5

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>unmarried girl</gloss>

daijs

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>virgin</gloss>
+<dial>&thb;</dial>
+<gloss>young girl</gloss>
+<gloss>daughter</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1083820">デブ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2840756">おデブ</xref>

Better have both.

おデブ	90965
おデブさん	11538

Should we trim this down to おデブ？ or make that a new entry?

ordered by googits

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おでぶさん</reb>

お蔭	169337
御蔭	29630
お陰	2115916
御陰	40894

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お陰</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>御蔭</keb>
+<keb>御陰</keb>
@@ -11,4 +14 @@
-<keb>お陰</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御陰</keb>
+<keb>御蔭</keb>
@@ -35 +35 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270210">お蔭で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270210">おかげで</xref>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -33,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, nc

@@ -21,1 +21,6 @@
-<gloss>(your) backing</gloss>
+<gloss>grace (of God)</gloss>
+<gloss>benevolence (of Buddha)</gloss>
+<gloss>blessing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -23,1 +28,8 @@
-<gloss>thanks or owing to</gloss>
+<gloss>help</gloss>
+<gloss>aid</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270210">お蔭で</xref>
+<gloss>effects</gloss>
+<gloss>influence</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr: （「で」を伴って）特に恩恵を受けていなくても，漠然とした感謝の気持ちを表す語。ありがたいことに。多く挨拶の語として用いる。「―で無事に帰って参りました」「『御両親は御健在ですか』『はい，―で』」
daijs: 「おかげ」をさらに敬っていう語。「すべて神様の―と感謝する」

I thought "grace of God" more or less covered covered daijr's sense 2 (where you express gratitude for some situation or result that didn't involve someone else's help or efforts), but on reflection, there's nothing inherently religious about "おかげさまで無事に帰って参りました".
I'm not sure what the right approach is here. Probably best to drop the おかげさまで x-ref from the "grace (of God)" sense and instead just treat it as an extra-polite form of the equivalent おかげ sense (as in daijs).

@@ -21 +21,13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・2</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as おかげさまで</s_inf>
+<gloss>(someone's) assistance</gloss>
+<gloss>help</gloss>
+<gloss>aid</gloss>
+<gloss>kindness</gloss>
+<gloss>goodwill</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001640">おかげ・1</xref>
@@ -27,11 +38,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・2</xref>
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>(someone's) assistance</gloss>
-<gloss>help</gloss>
-<gloss>aid</gloss>
-<gloss>kindness</gloss>
-<gloss>goodwill</gloss>

Should the "grace (of God)" sense really lead? 
Aren't the relative frequencies of sense 1/2 
something like 1/99？Or am I missing something?

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

aligning with 客 1226630

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +23,7 @@
+<gloss>client</gloss>
+<gloss>shopper</gloss>
+<gloss>spectator</gloss>
+<gloss>audience</gloss>
+<gloss>tourist</gloss>
+<gloss>sightseer</gloss>
+<gloss>passenger</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

rm 'practise' everywhere it is being used as a noun

@@ -21,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>practise</gloss>

"陰茎をいう幼児語。" daijr
but I think it's fine to have both "children's" and "vulgar"

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/���� for 
katakana (plus google hits)

茨城弁大辞典 (on weblio)
+
http://www.ibaraking.com/archives/51

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンコ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +17,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>
+<gloss>practice</gloss>
+<gloss>practise</gloss>
+</sense>

adv

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>tinkling</gloss>
-<gloss>jingling</gloss>
+<gloss>with a tinkle</gloss>
+<gloss>with a jingle</gloss>
@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>whistling (of a kettle)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a whistle (of a kettle)</gloss>

daijr:  クロダイの幼魚の異名。主に関東でいう。
meikyo:  主に関東で、クロダイの幼魚の通称。

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>black porgy juvenile</gloss>
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>
+<gloss>juvenile black porgy</gloss>

I have switched the selected example for sense 3 to a different sentence. It will show up next week.

Yes, it probably should. I have raised it in the Tatoeba forum and we'll see what the NSJ people say.

example sentence for number 3 should be 私はあなたとお話できてよかった or 私はあなたと話せてよかった

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/9359

There's a good explanation in the link posted.
----
I think the "?" gloss is confusing. I thought someone had forgotten to write something in. While not ideal, the old way was better in my view.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -26,3 +25 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2086960">って・1</xref>
-<gloss g_type="expl">particle used for quoting (with speech, thoughts, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>used for quoting (thoughts, speech, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -39 +36 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end; indicates question</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>
@@ -41 +38 @@
-<gloss>?</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates a question</gloss>

ところがどっこい	77667
所がどっこい	597
ところが	16024290

Aligning. GG5 has one examples of it.

@@ -10 +10,7 @@
-<s_inf>emphatic version of ところが</s_inf>
+<s_inf>emph. version of ところが</s_inf>
+<gloss>even so</gloss>
+<gloss>however</gloss>
+<gloss>still</gloss>
+<gloss>whereupon</gloss>
+<gloss>even though</gloss>
+<gloss>nevertheless</gloss>
@@ -11,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>as a matter of fact</gloss>
+<gloss>despite</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1480494599

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1008570">ところが</xref>
+<s_inf>emphatic version of ところが</s_inf>

GG5

Better.

http://eow.alc.co.jp/ところがどっこい/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<gloss>funny you should mention that</gloss>
+<gloss>on the contrary</gloss>

fork

@@ -21,0 +21,2 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

ばつ一 in daijs (but only 7-8k results)
411,000 results for 罰一

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>罰一</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ばつ一</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +15,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,1 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>divorced (once) (lit: strike one, i.e. one name struck from the koseki)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1267030">戸籍</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>one-time divorcee</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">strike one, i.e. one name struck from the koseki</gloss>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">one x mark, i.e. one name struck from the koseki</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">one x mark (i.e. one name struck from the family register)</gloss>

"you have a tendency to cause forks" - that's a quite the 
unnecessarily hostile overstatement. As is "submission 
rampage," which I can only read as an implication I'm 
somehow causing the dictionary more harm than good. I go 
through the submission list every now and then to check if 
I've made any mistakes, and sometimes I realize something 
could be added. I of course aim to do a complete and perfect 
entry from the start, but in the end, the entries end up 
more complete precisely because I do give them a second (and 
third) glance. (though I guess this one is a little overly 
messy with little time passed between the edits - sorry!)

koj, daijs - nothing wrong with original gloss in ref to the state of being once-divorced.  koj adds that it is joc:
一度離婚経験があることを冗談めかしていう語

Please refrain from making four amendments at once, especially when you're going on a submission rampage.  Multiple amendments make it very difficult to tell what you've changed and why, you have a tendency to cause forks, and in general it just makes a mess of our approval queue.

Plan it out and make one amendment.

@@ -30,0 +30,2 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<gloss>being once divorced</gloss>

Fair enough.

https://senmonsait33.blog.ss-blog.jp/2014-07-04-19
"そこで、大阪の方言の一つを紹介したいと思います。
この言葉は、ケンミンショーでも紹介された言葉です。
でも、あまり口にして言う言葉ではないので、
この記事上でも一部省いて紹介しておきます。
まず、そのある言葉というのが、
ババです。
ババ抜きのババ？という感じがしますが、
大阪の人にとってババとはう○ちのことを指しているそうなんです。
あまり頻繁に口に出すべき言葉ではないですよね。
ババというらしいんです。
...
大阪の人たちは本当にこのババという
言葉を使っているのか気になるところですが、
外で大きな声で言うことはできませんよね。"

From this blog post (and the fact that it was introduced as an Osakan word on the popular TV show "Kenmmin show"), it seems it's not 
widely known outside of Kansai, so I think the vulgar sense should come first. 
(my 3 Kansai native informers are strictly speaking Osakans)

@@ -14,0 +15,8 @@
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<dial>&osb;</dial>
+<gloss>shit</gloss>
+<gloss>crap</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,8 +28,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>Kansai usage</s_inf>
-<gloss>shit</gloss>
-<gloss>crap</gloss>
-</sense>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ばば?edc=OSAKA
"あまり上品ではない言い方。"

OK

How about this? The note could be replaced by "ksb", but it's usage rather than a specific dialect word.

@@ -14,0 +15,8 @@
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>pooh-pooh</gloss>
+<gloss>poop</gloss>
+<gloss>something dirty</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>Kansai usage</s_inf>

Could it be that the word only sounds vulgar to people from Kansai?
All the kokugos are in agreement that it's 幼児語.

I think they are fairly specific usage points that don't fit into an entry like this.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to start to ... （as a habit) (with dictionary form)</gloss>
+<gloss>to start to ...</gloss>
@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to become able to (with potential form)</gloss>

https://apieceofsushi.com/jlpt-n4-grammar-文法-you-ni-naru-ようになる-意味-meaning-例文-example/

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to start to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to start to ... （as a habit) (with dictionary form)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to become able to (with potential form)</gloss>

gg5, DBJG

@@ -16,3 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>to reach the point that</gloss>
-<gloss>to come to be that</gloss>
-<gloss>to turn into</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to reach the point where ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to be that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to start to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to ...</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>tongue of beef, pork, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>tongue (beef, pork, etc.)</gloss>

https://www.adi-files.com/sneaker-data/name-of-each-part.html (about halfway down)

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 84

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tongue (of a shoe)</gloss>

daijs, 百科事典マイペディア

@@ -10,1 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>tongue</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>tongue of beef, pork, etc.</gloss>

meikyo
しまりなく太っていること。また、その人。

in sense 1, the noun refers to being fat; in sense 2, it refers to the person

sense 1 is already n.
why dont you just change sense 1 to n,adj?

gg5, meikyo

Often refers to the person.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>fat</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>fat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>fatso</gloss>
+<gloss>fatty</gloss>
+<gloss>fat person</gloss>

Daijr

daijs

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あくごん</reb>
+</r_ele>

Please refrain from excessive use of examples.  I do not see what they add in sense 1.

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to entrust (a matter) to (e.g. police, courts, power of attorney, the officials)</gloss>
+<gloss>to entrust (a matter) to</gloss>
+<gloss>to leave to</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* Split into two senses (entrust vs. abandon)
* Add examples

@@ -15,1 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>to entrust to</gloss>
+<gloss>to entrust (a matter) to (e.g. police, courts, power of attorney, the officials)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to abandon oneself to (e.g. pleasure)</gloss>
+<gloss>to yield to (e.g. anger)</gloss>
@@ -17,1 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to abandon oneself to</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

More gloss, alt sense

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>amicable</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>without fuss</gloss>
+<gloss>simply</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr

@@ -18,0 +18,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +24,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

References for the 2nd sense:
1) first-hand knowledge
2) Google image search for 旗頭

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<sense>
+<gloss>(Okinawa) bamboo poles with an attached vertical flag and an elaborate display at the top that are used during the annual fertility and thanks-giving festivals</gloss>
+</sense>

(stands to reason)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&male;</misc>

Daijr: 金玉が上がったり下がったりする
ひどく恐れて落ち着かない。びくびくする。

Suggest resurrecting this one. It suffered from a typo. Not that common.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>金玉が上がったり下ったり</keb>
+<keb>金玉が上がったり下がったり</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きんたまがあがったりくだったり</reb>
+<reb>きんたまがあがったりさがったり</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834348">上がったり下がったり・あがったりさがったり</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>scared stiff</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">one's testicles going up and down</gloss>

Hmmm. 69 entries, all drawn from EDICT.

I was speaking to my friend in Japan and was trying to explain the word "suspense", so looked it up.  I said this one (kintama ga agattari kudattari), and she started laughing and said it must have been entered as a joke.  She told me to look up "kintama" which apparently means "testicle."  So, basically this means "testicles up or down" and while that may be how some people express "being held in suspense," I think it is explicit and should be at least marked as such.  Please review this entry.

G n-grams:
おかげで	7200340
お陰で	1629092
お蔭で	 121563
御蔭で	  16464
御陰で	  15961

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

merging in 2220590 with its superior general glosses

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お陰で</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お蔭で</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +14,1 @@
-<keb>お蔭で</keb>
+<keb>御陰で</keb>
@@ -15,3 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>thanks to you</gloss>
-<gloss>owing to you</gloss>
-<gloss>because of you</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001640">お蔭・おかげ・3</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>thanks to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>owing to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>because of ...</gloss>

I don't think those new glosses should lead.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to perceive</gloss>
+<gloss>to sense</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to perceive</gloss>
-<gloss>to sense</gloss>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to become aware</gloss>
+<gloss>to notice</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to detect</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* Split perceive/understand
* Flag enlightenment as [Buddh]

@@ -22,3 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to understand</gloss>
-<gloss>to comprehend</gloss>
-<gloss>to realize</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +29,8 @@
+<gloss>to understand</gloss>
+<gloss>to comprehend</gloss>
+<gloss>to realize</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>

lots of web support for term removed.  we don't bowdlerize this dictionary

unappropriate

@@ -21,8 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2180730">タチ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1659120">受け・5</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>dominant partner of a homosexual relationship</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>

Fix xref.

@@ -23,2 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1659120">受け・5</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1659120">受け・5</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1659120">受け・5</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1659120">受け・5</xref>

再来	307424	99.7%
再來	851	0.3%
Unidic

Saw it in the wild.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>再來</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

generalizing

@@ -17,2 +17,7 @@
-<gloss>return (e.g. follow-up patient)</gloss>
-<gloss>second coming (e.g. of Christ, of a famous artist)</gloss>
+<gloss>return</gloss>
+<gloss>coming back</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>second coming (e.g. of Christ)</gloss>

GG5 daijr

Saw at hospital as “follow-up patient”, contrasted with 新来
(GG5 gives “second coming of Mozart”, daijr gives “second coming of Bashō. East is east, and west is west…)

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>return</gloss>
-<gloss>second coming</gloss>
+<gloss>return (e.g. follow-up patient)</gloss>
+<gloss>second coming (e.g. of Christ, of a famous artist)</gloss>

Can't really add glosses on the basis of one usage. I think "ugly" is fine in its broader 
usage, e.g. "ugly scene". That's where WordNet is coming from.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ムゴい</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

wordnet https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/惨い

Saw this being used to say that a person looks hideous, in the sentence 彼女に頼んだけどあまりにムゴかったのでやめた。

@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>ugly</gloss>
+<gloss>horrifying</gloss>

惨い	1071
むごい	2214
惨く	95
むごく	151

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

the glosses alone should suffice for sense 2

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>merciless</gloss>
+<gloss>pitiless</gloss>
+<gloss>brutal</gloss>
@@ -17,1 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>merciless</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>brutal</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>tragic (e.g. tragic death, scenes of starvation)</gloss>
+<gloss>tragic</gloss>
+<gloss>horrible</gloss>
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>
+<gloss>dreadful</gloss>

daijs

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かんぶくろ</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -53 +53 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Adding n-adv is consistent with Unidic

Consistent with Unidic and helps distinguish from other とき nouns

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

Let it go for now. If it's a problem we can split.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>to cozy up (to)</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to cozy up (to)</gloss>

I think that's right.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>to butter up (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to butter up</gloss>

I don't think you ever butter up "to" someone. You just butter someone up.

I could go either way, but I think this works fine.

Some of those glosses take on a different meaning without "to" so I think they need to be included in some way.

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>to curry favour with</gloss>
-<gloss>to play up to</gloss>
-<gloss>to butter up to</gloss>
-<gloss>to cozy up to</gloss>
+<gloss>to curry favour (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to play up (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to butter up (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cozy up (to)</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

prog, daij

Simplified sense 2 gloss.
The kokugos only have "副詞的にも用いる" for this so I've changed the PoS to n-adv.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>always</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>24-hour (e.g. observation, operation (of a machine), care (of patient))</gloss>
+<gloss>24-hour (operation, care, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>constant</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

Add “continuous, 24-hour” sense – saw in article on patient needing 24-hour care.
See also 常時接続 for this sense.

@@ -20,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<gloss>continuous</gloss>
+<gloss>24-hour (e.g. observation, operation (of a machine), care (of patient))</gloss>
+<gloss>always on</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2009790">まさかの時</xref>

GG5

In its まさか entry, GG5 has the example:
「まさかこれ全部僕がやるんじゃないですよね？」「そのまさかだよ」 "Surely this isn't all for me to do, is it？"―"It surely is．"
Yes, I think it's worth an entry.

http://dev.jgram.org/pages/viewOne.php?tagE=masaka  
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1060101575  
http://ameblo.jp/bakassakagen/entry-10894306018.html

A couple times now, I've run across dialogue in a book where one person says "まさか" and the other person replies "そのまさかだ"... an exchange like "No way!"/"Way!" or "No!"/"Yes!" or "It can't be!"/"It is!".  I also found it at the three reference links.

I thought of adding an entry for そのまさかだ, but I didn't know how to phrase the meaning... basically it's the opposite of whatever the other person is using まさか for, but I can't figure out how to generalize it.

So if you have an idea, and you think it's worth adding an entry, you might do so.

OK, I'll make it "arch".

@@ -31,1 +31,1 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Not sure they're that useful.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thesaurus:condomless

@@ -31,0 +32,2 @@
+<gloss>raw</gloss>
+<gloss>bareback</gloss>

生ディスク	1105
生テープ	2298
GG5

I don't think this fits any of the current senses.

@@ -61,0 +62,6 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2836376">生テープ</xref>
+<gloss>blank (e.g. disk)</gloss>
+<gloss>unused</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

daijr

I think we need to keep n but adj-na and n-pref can go.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22,2 +21 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -31,2 +29 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -34 +31 @@
-<gloss>unprotected (i.e. not wearing a condom)</gloss>
+<gloss>unprotected (sex)</gloss>
@@ -38,2 +35 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -44,2 +40 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -53 +47,0 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
@@ -68,0 +63 @@
+<s_inf>before an adjective</s_inf>
@@ -79 +74,2 @@
-<gloss>irresponsibly</gloss>
+<gloss>insufficient</gloss>
+<gloss>incomplete</gloss>
@@ -80,0 +77,2 @@
+<gloss>half-hearted</gloss>
+<gloss>perfunctory</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5 daijr koj

* Add pos [vs]
* More glosses

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>preeminence</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>transcendence</gloss>

prog, gg5, etc.

@@ -12,1 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>irrelevant, strange, offbeat, or provocatively teasing question</gloss>
+<gloss>strange question</gloss>
+<gloss>offbeat question</gloss>
+<gloss>odd question</gloss>
+<gloss>funny question</gloss>
+<gloss>curious question</gloss>

Text at hand:
"ウシュマイとンミーが観客と繰り広げる珍問答は、方言が分らない人にも、
そのコミカルな動きで笑いを誘う。" ("ウシュマイ"=grandfather; "ン
ミー"=grandmother)
2) http://www.weblio.jp/content/珍問
3) http://dic.search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UTF-8&p=珍問

The context is a festive activity in Yaeyama, Okinawa, during the Bon-Festival. 
The questions being asked are sometimes provocative, sometimes meant to 
provoke laughter - but not "irrelevant" - and in any case meant to elicit witty 
replies. Two dictionary sources mentioned above suggest that "irrelevant" is too 
narrow a definition, but i'd like someone to double-check (and perhaps improve) my 
suggested definition...

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>irrelevant question</gloss>
+<gloss>irrelevant, strange, offbeat, or provocatively teasing question</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ でん粉　 │  97,626 │ 19.0% │
│ デン粉　 │     184 │  0.0% │
│ 澱粉　　 │ 146,683 │ 28.5% │
│ 殿粉　　 │     276 │  0.1% │ 🡠 rK (only shinmeikai)
│ でんぷん │ 155,900 │ 30.3% │
│ デンプン │ 114,315 │ 22.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reordering

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>澱粉</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>澱粉</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
でんぷん	155900
デンプン	114315
でん粉	97626
澱粉	146683
殿粉	276

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Ehh!?

@@ -5,3 +5,1 @@
-<keb>日本語</keb>
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf02</ke_pri>
+<keb>日本語ざあささ</keb>

ブサイクな男	3568	   
ブサイクな女	1917

@@ -32 +31,0 @@
-<s_inf>esp. of men</s_inf>

OK. I'd only encountered it in male contexts.

gg5
daijr, koj: "「ぶざいく」とも"

Source for the "esp. of men" note? I regularly hear it used to refer to women.
I don't think the derog tag is necessary.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<reb>ぶざいく</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +24,3 @@
+<gloss>awkward</gloss>
+<gloss>poorly made</gloss>
+<gloss>botched</gloss>
@@ -25 +30,0 @@
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
@@ -28,2 +33,3 @@
-<gloss>plain (e.g. looks)</gloss>
-<gloss>ugly</gloss>
+<gloss>ugly (of a person)</gloss>
+<gloss>unattractive</gloss>
+<gloss>plain</gloss>
@@ -31 +36,0 @@
-<gloss>unattractive</gloss>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<s_inf>esp. of men</s_inf>

meikyo, gg5

the one near the ear, not the one near the nose

@@ -19,1 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>corner of the eye</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1641220">目頭</xref>
+<gloss>outer canthus</gloss>
+<gloss>outer corner of the eye</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>眼尻</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>