Merged with 1038820.

Probably.

@@ -42,0 +43 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

poss. a [col] tag is warranted?

GG5, G n-grams:
キャッチホンが入った	132
キャッチが入った	538

I think キャッチが入った is an abbreviation of キャッチホンが入った, as indicated in GG5. It's probably better to have an extra sense based on that.

@@ -14,5 +13,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1041570">キャッチホン</xref>
@@ -43,0 +39,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1041570">キャッチホン</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>call waiting</gloss>
+</sense>

When you receive a phonecall when on the phone, you say キャッチが入った

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1041570">キャッチホン</xref>

Just "alien" works.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>alien to one</gloss>
+<gloss>alien</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=縁遠い

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>alien to one</gloss>

it's not in any of my sources either.

@@ -16,1 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>lately married</gloss>
+<gloss>unconnected</gloss>
+<gloss>weakly related</gloss>
+<gloss>far beyond (one's means, ability)</gloss>
@@ -22,6 +24,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<gloss>unconnected</gloss>
-<gloss>weakly related</gloss>
-<gloss>far beyond (one's means, ability)</gloss>
-</sense>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Any support for sense 1? Not in any of my refs.

@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>far beyond (one's means, one's ability)</gloss>
+<gloss>far beyond (one's means, ability)</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manneken_Pis

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Mannekin Pis (cupid-like statue urinating into a fountain)</gloss>
-<gloss>petite Julien</gloss>
+<gloss>Manneken Pis (cupid-like statue urinating into a fountain)</gloss>
+<gloss>Petit Julien</gloss>

Not really convinced that third gloss is needed.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>with compliments (e.g. written on minor gift)</gloss>
+<gloss>with compliments (e.g. written on small gift)</gloss>

GG5

Add gloss “with compliments” – just saw at shrine (on tray of sweets)

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>with compliments (e.g. written on minor gift)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<keb>插入(oK)</keb>
+<keb>插入</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

my kanwa

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>插入(oK)</keb>

GG5, ルミナス

"local branch" seems tautologous to me. I don't think the example is needed.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>local branch (of a larger organization, e.g., fire department)</gloss>
+<gloss>branch (of a larger organization)</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>branch</gloss>
-<gloss>chapter</gloss>

Elaborate to clarify, give example of fire department (given in 新解さん, and saw today on a sign referring to a local branch of a fire department)

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>local branch (of a larger organization, e.g., fire department)</gloss>
+<gloss>local chapter</gloss>

I think it's worth tagging as irregular.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 鋒　　 │ 40,990 │ 45.4% │
│ 切っ先 │ 40,045 │ 44.4% │
│ 切先　 │  8,749 │  9.7% │ isn't this a lot popular to be irregular?
│ 切尖　 │    303 │  0.3% │ add rK
│ きっ先 │    154 │  0.2% │ found used in daijr defs
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>切尖</keb>
+<keb>切先</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,2 +15,6 @@
-<keb>切先</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>切尖</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>きっ先</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

koj, daij, gg5

there's no chance that 鋒[きっさき] deserves a news tag.  perhaps 切っ先 does, but as i understand it, news tags were not assigned by reading

@@ -9,2 +9,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf33</ke_pri>
@@ -15,0 +13,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切先</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17,2 +19,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf33</re_pri>
@@ -26,1 +26,5 @@
-<gloss>point or edge of a blade, a pointed or pointy object, pointed (attack, comments, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>point (of a sword, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pointed verbal attack</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切尖</keb>
@@ -23,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>point of a sword</gloss>
+<gloss>point or edge of a blade, a pointed or pointy object, pointed (attack, comments, etc.)</gloss>

新和英中辞典, eijiro, Honyaku discussion

@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>passion for gambling</gloss>
+<gloss>fondness for speculation</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

Email from Hendrik. Entry needed to be cleaned up a little.

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>FSI</gloss>
+<gloss>floor area ratio</gloss>
+<gloss>FAR</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>plot ratio</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&archit;</field>

建蔽率	12883
建ぺい率	331884
建坪率	1675

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>建蔽率</keb>
+<keb>建ぺい率</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>建ぺい率</keb>
+<keb>建蔽率</keb>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

daijr has 建坪率 as a real headword, and daijs says ◆「建坪率」とも当てて書く。  so i think the [iK] should be dropped.  (and perhaps it should be called ateji?)

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス

Original gloss too general.

@@ -6,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>建ぺい率</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>建坪率</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,2 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>coverage</gloss>
-<gloss>coverage ratio</gloss>
+<gloss>building-to-land ratio</gloss>
+<gloss>building coverage ratio</gloss>
+<gloss>land coverage</gloss>
+<gloss>site coverage</gloss>

Not sure these are different senses.

prog

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バチン</reb>
@@ -12,0 +15,15 @@
+<gloss>whack</gloss>
+<gloss>sound of a sharp blow with something flat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>wham</gloss>
+<gloss>sound of striking with something solid</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>zap</gloss>
+<gloss>crack</gloss>
+<gloss>sound of thunder</gloss>

Entry created

Moved to enamdict.

mentioned in daij entry for 蘭領インド

edict, enamdict?

@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蘭領東印度</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>the Dutch East Indies</gloss>
+<gloss>Dutch East Indies</gloss>

Moved to enamdict.

koj, daij

edict? enamdict?

Moved to enamdict.

koj

edict? enamdict?

Moved to enamdict.

koj

edict? enamdict?

We really need a good policy on what name goes where. I guess if カリフォルニア rates a mention, then a French DOMTOM does too.

Correct reading is タヒチとう.  Already an entry in enamdict. perhaps useful in edict itself, but that's always Jim's decision.  Adding adj-no to account for the タヒチ島の entry, which cannot be included, because that's not the way edict handles ~の adjectives

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>タヒチしま</reb>
+<reb>タヒチとう</reb>
@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/

Moved to enamdict.

http://eow.alc.co.jp

Moved to enamdict.

http://eow.alc.co.jp

Daijs

This is my take on the translation:
"証券取引所（金融商品取引所）が、上場廃止基準に触れるおそれのある株式について割り当てる特別の扱い。監理銘柄（審査中）と監理銘柄（確認中）の二つの指定がある。上場廃止の可能性を一般投資家に周知徹底させるための措置で、売買は通常通り行われるが、上場廃止と決まれば整理銘柄になる。企業側の説明などによって廃止基準に触れないと判断されれば指定は解除される。"

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>special treatment for a company on a stock exchange</gloss>
+<gloss>supervised trading of a stock, e.g. during delisting</gloss>

daijs

Daijs

My take on the translation.
Note that RNNNews glosses it as monitoring post/supervisory post.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>special treatment for a company on a stock exchange</gloss>
+<gloss>supervised trading of a stock, e.g. during delisting</gloss>

daijs

I think the existing 周 is OK.

Luminous, ALC

I agree.

I think it's too obvious. I doubt we really need 粉々に砕く/粉々になる either.

See below.

This gets 220k Google hits. Meaning is clear and reading also. It was in text which I was reading.

You have two similar entries:-
粉々に砕く; 粉粉に砕く 【こなごなにくだく】 (exp,v5k) to smash to pieces
粉々になる; 粉粉になる 【こなごなになる】 (exp,v5r) to break into fragments; to go to pieces
Perhaps this could also be included as well.

-koj is not a trustworthy source for okurigana. however, wiki and yahoo enc have it without the り.
-i don't think it's 'food terminology'.  i would not expect 'bag lunch' to be accompanied by such a tag in english

@@ -6,3 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>破子</keb>
@@ -17,1 +14,1 @@
-<keb>破り子</keb>
+<keb>破子</keb>
@@ -21,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>破り子</keb>
@@ -37,2 +37,1 @@
-<field>&food;</field>
-<gloss>food served in such a box (either similar to bento, or noodles, esp. soba served in stacked boxes)</gloss>
+<gloss>food served in such a box</gloss>

daijr koj
See also 破り子蕎麦 破子蕎麦 entries

* Add food sense (seen both as bento and as noodles, the latter repeatedly)
* Alt spelling 割子 (koj mentions, and by far most common) and 割籠 (koj)
* mention lid
* Remove [io] – there’s no ambiguity here, just typical contraction, and dicts often write 破子 or 破籠 (e.g., koj)
(We generally reserved [io] for when there’s ambiguity, like wago/kango, right? 気配り（きくばり） can’t be written as 気配 b/c of confusion with けはい) (also for verbs on their own (e.g., 行なう), but not in the middle of compounds, right?)

@@ -5,0 +5,12 @@
+<keb>割子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>破子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>破籠</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>割り子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>割籠</keb>
@@ -11,6 +26,1 @@
-<keb>破子</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>破籠</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>割り籠</keb>
@@ -23,1 +33,6 @@
-<gloss>partitioned wooden lunchbox</gloss>
+<gloss>partitioned lidded wooden lunchbox</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>food served in such a box (either similar to bento, or noodles, esp. soba served in stacked boxes)</gloss>

io versions from koj

@@ -9,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>破子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>破籠</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

GG5, ルミナス

I'd like evidence.

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>I blew it! I messed up!</gloss>
+<gloss>(having) expectations</gloss>
+<gloss>(having) an ideal</gloss>

koj, daij

I trust the dictionaries.  But perhaps there is a second sense?

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あんべし</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,1 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Daijr

Hmmm. Daijirin has "あるはずだ。あるべきである。".

already submitted as an amendment to 1399840

we create entries for base forms (e.g. 插入), not for extensions like this

eij

zero google hits as submitted

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>插入スイッチ</keb>
+<keb>挿入スイッチ</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>そうにゅうすいっち</reb>
+<reb>そうにゅうスイッチ</reb>
@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

插入する is handled in the entry for 插入 as [vs]

Yes, it needed the がた inserted; not the 型 removed.
Anyway, it's the sort of uncommon and obvious technical compound you see all the time. Not worth recording.

G n-grams: 
挿入流量計	No matches
挿入型流量計	21

挿入型流量計 is the form on weblio (クロスランゲージ 37分野専門語辞書) but I'm not sure we need this at all.

After trying to look it up, I'm still not sure, but I think the 型 is extraneous here? The reading element completely ignores it.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>挿入型流量計</keb>
+<keb>挿入流量計</keb>

weblio

as submitted, gets no legitimate japanese google hits

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>插入型流量計</keb>
+<keb>挿入型流量計</keb>
@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>