@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>karaoke (pun)</gloss>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<gloss>karaoke</gloss>

Daijr: (中に何も入っていない桶。空っぽの桶。)

The latter, I think.

@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1038660">空オケ・からオケ</xref>
+<gloss>karaoke (pun)</gloss>
+</sense>

nikk

i don't understand the original purpose of this entry.  to replace what i've removed, should 空桶 just be added to the entry for カラオケ as [iK] or [ateji]?  if not, it should be a second sense here with an x-ref

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>pun on karaoke (literally, empty bucket)</gloss>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>empty bucket</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Koj.

Quite a bit of discussion on the sci.lang.japan group about this. Koj has "「士」とも書く" in its さむらい entry.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>士</keb>
@@ -18,0 +21,1 @@
+<re_restr>侍</re_restr>

Aligning.

@@ -29,2 +28,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2682040">慈悲心鳥</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2682040">慈悲心鳥</xref>
@@ -32,2 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>Hodgson's hawk-cuckoo (Cuculus fugax)</gloss>
-<gloss>Horsfield's hawk cuckoo</gloss>
+<gloss>rufous hawk-cuckoo</gloss>
+<gloss>northern hawk-cuckoo</gloss>

gg5, prog, ウィズダム和英辞典

As Jim said, "e.g. of Buddha" isn't necessary (unless we want to make a separate [Buddh] sense).
All the JEs lead with "mercy".

@@ -19 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>compassion (e.g. of Buddha)</gloss>
+<gloss>mercy</gloss>
+<gloss>compassion</gloss>
+<gloss>clemency</gloss>
+<gloss>pity</gloss>
+<gloss>charity</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>charity</gloss>
-<gloss>mercy</gloss>

Daijr

Not sure the "e.g." is needed. GG5 has: 御仏(みほとけ)の慈悲 the 「compassion [mercy] of Buddha; Buddha's compassion (for the living)

@@ -24,0 +24,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2682040">慈悲心鳥</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Hodgson's hawk-cuckoo (Cuculus fugax)</gloss>
+<gloss>Horsfield's hawk cuckoo</gloss>
+</sense>

n-grams: 拾壱	15,451

seen in the wild

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>拾壱</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK. I've done the split. I assume the katakana version is no longer appropriate here.

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ジュウイチ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -33,7 +28,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>ateji derived from its call</s_inf>
-<gloss>Hodgson's hawk-cuckoo (Cuculus fugax)</gloss>
-<gloss>Horsfield's hawk cuckoo</gloss>

koj: 「じゅういちい」と鳴くからいう。俗に「十一」の字を当てる

It's the name, not the ateji, that's derived from the bird's call. I think sense 3 should be a separate entry so that we can tag 十一 as ateji. The kokugos don't merge. Etymologically, there's no connection.

koj, daij, gg5, wiki

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>ウラジロノキ</reb>
+<reb>ウラジロ</reb>
@@ -16,2 +16,9 @@
-<gloss>fern with white-backed leaves</gloss>
-<gloss>sorbus japonica</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>Gleichenia japonica (species of fern with white-backed leaves)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>white underside</gloss>
+<gloss>white bottom</gloss>
+<gloss>white inner</gloss>

koj

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>擲り飛ばす</keb>

daijr, daijs, Luminous

@@ -13,1 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to knock a person off his feet</gloss>
+<gloss>to knock (a person) off his feet</gloss>
+<gloss>to hit (something) hard</gloss>
+<gloss>to send (someone) flying</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2682130">入国管理法</xref>

Entry created

Shinmeikai tags both senses as 雅 but nikk defines the deer sense as "「しか(鹿)」の古名".

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>deer meat</gloss>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<gloss>venison</gloss>

Daijs

I was very dubious about 鹿肉 being read かのしし, but I see it's in 大辞泉.
I agree that it should be kept as separate entries.

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/鹿肉
(Gives only しかにく as a reading)

* Remove しかにく reading + restriction – there’s already a separate 鹿肉（しかにく） entry.
* Add a [see] link instead

This is messy situation, because there are two readings （かのしし、しかにく）, two spellings (鹿、鹿肉), and two meanings (deer, deer meat) (hence 8 possible combinations), and they don’t line up in a simple way.

The current situation is wrong:
* firstly b/c it has (鹿肉／しかにく／deer meat) in two places (this entry and a separate entry with just that),
* secondly b/c I don’t think 鹿 (by itself) is read as しかにく (so it’s missing a restriction)

The options are either:
* One consolidated entry – delete the (鹿肉／しかにく／deer meat) entry, add a restriction so しかにく is restricted to 鹿肉
* Two separate entries – a かのしし entry (2 spellings, 2 meanings) and a しかにく entry (1 spelling, 1 meaning), and no restrictions

I think it’s clearer with two separate entries (hence why I’m suggesting that):
* 鹿肉／しかにく／deer meat is a easy word, and what you would expect when seeing it (admittedly, 湯桶読み), so it should have a clear entry (for usability).
* かのしし seems really old-fashioned or dialectical
* There is a shared 鹿肉／？／deer meat sense, which is the root of the issues – a link relates these simply
It’s clear enough if these are separate, but gets really messy if one tries to put them together.
Do this sound sane?

@@ -13,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しかにく</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2073740">鹿肉・しかにく</xref>
@@ -21,1 +19,0 @@
-<stagr>かのしし</stagr>

Entry created

I think this is cleaner. No "lit".

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>recreational vehicle (usu. not camper or motor home)</gloss>
+<gloss>RV</gloss>
@@ -18,1 +20,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">recreational vehicle (RV) (usu. not camper or motor home)</gloss>

is the lit tag appropriate here?

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>lit: recreational vehicle (RV) (usu. not camper or motor home)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">recreational vehicle (RV) (usu. not camper or motor home)</gloss>

Entry created

daij: "形動ナリ"

X-ref isn't necessary.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1222540">気品・1</xref>
+<pos>&adj-nari;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>beautiful</gloss>

koj, daij

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/search?stype=0&ei=UTF-8&dtype=2&p=あてやか

Further discussion with Ben.

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>efferent neuron</gloss>
+<gloss>efferent nerve</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>efferent neuron</gloss>
-<gloss>efferent nerve</gloss>

Several WWW pages with parallel J/E have "output cell" and
"output neuron" too.
I'll ask Ben.

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>output cell</gloss>
+<gloss>output neuron</gloss>

i feel that 出力細胞 probably has broader applicability than neurons.  eijiro has "output cell", but that doesn't do much for me

Is there a final version coming?

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>efferent neuron efferent nerve</gloss>
+<gloss>efferent neuron</gloss>
+<gloss>efferent nerve</gloss>

https://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy-
ab&hl=en&lr=lang_ja&inlang=ja&tbs=lr%3Alang_1ja&source=hp&q=%2
2%E5%87%BA%E5%8A%9B%E7%B4%B0%E8%83%9E%22+efferent&oq=%22%E5%87
%BA%E5%8A%9B%E7%B4%B0%E8%83%9E%22+efferent&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_s
m=e&gs_upl=99579l100908l0l101201l9l9l0l8l0l0l101l101l0.1l1l0

This is a preliminary translation.

Removing "/".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>often 心臓破りの丘/坂</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often 心臓破りの丘|坂</s_inf>

i'm not sure i'd use "heart-breaking" to describe physical exertion

330k hits. Worth a mention.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Heart-break</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>often 心臓破りの丘/坂</s_inf>
+<gloss>heart-breaking (esp. in physical activity such as running)</gloss>

I think it can be rejected for now.  The reference box is up there for a reason; it's not our job to go digging.

This seems plausible, but I can't find any hard evidence for it.

daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

wiki, eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, eij

gg5, eij

nikk, ls, jwn, wi1, eij

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポール・バーン</reb>

Honyaku discussion.

Dupe.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">ジュウイチ</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・3</xref>

Dupe.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">ジュウイチ</xref>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・3</xref>

慈悲心鳥	        676
じひしんちょう	31
ジヒシンチョウ	0

Aligning.
Doesn't appear to be uk.

@@ -17,3 +17,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>Hodgson's hawk-cuckoo (Cuculus fugax)</gloss>
-<gloss>Horsfield's hawk cuckoo</gloss>
+<gloss>rufous hawk-cuckoo (Hierococcyx hyperythrus)</gloss>
+<gloss>northern hawk-cuckoo</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">ジュウイチ</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2855887">十一・じゅういち</xref>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1334470">十一・じゅういち・3</xref>

I think this is better.

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>mnemonic for remembering the months with fewer than 31 days (ni, shi, mu, ku, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>士 represents November as it can be decomposed into 十一 (11)</s_inf>
+<gloss>nishimuku samurai (mnemonic for remembering the months with fewer than 31 days)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 二四六九士　　　 │   120 │  1.8% │ - (daijr, koj)
│ 西向く侍　　　　 │ 4,054 │ 60.6% │ - (daijr, nikk)
│ 西向く士　　　　 │   306 │  4.6% │ - (daijs)
│ 西向くさむらい　 │    63 │  0.9% │ - sK
│ にしむくさむらい │ 2,148 │ 32.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

koj, daij

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>やまぐさ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>さんそう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,1 +18,11 @@
-<gloss>???</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain grass</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain weed</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain plant</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>やまくさ</stagr>
+<stagr>やまぐさ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1795930">裏白</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1795930">裏白・1</xref>
+<gloss>Gleichenia japonica (species of fern with white-backed leaves)</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

* Split 艶やか into つややか and あでやか entries – all the dictionaries give separate entries, with markedly different meanings (shiny (hair) vs. charming (lady)).
* Expand glosses (from “glossy”)
* Mark outdated kanji as [oK]

GG5: Japanese mountain ash; Sorbus japonica
ルミナス: whitebeam

See discussion on 2400600 too.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>Japanese whitebeam</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

I agree that this is not a real term.  Just a failure to use (or stylistic choice not to use) a comma between characters.

See below.

The actual text was this: "、夜家にいるのは...."
This led me to make the search. As you say, the Google entries generally show the separation of the kanji. Your second example is similar to the text which I was reading. It was when I picked up the reading of "よいえ" that I thought a submission may be useful.

I do not believe this is a word or expression. It is just a collocation of two single-kanji words. For example, in Eijiro there is:
今夜家に帰るのが待ちきれない - clearly 今夜 then 家
少し休めば、今夜家に帰れるでしょう - ditto
携帯電話はプリペード式、夜家に電話がかかってもとらない時もある - 夜 then 家
Every WWW occurrence I looked at was either a false positive, a place name, or this sort of usage.

See below.

In the context of the text which I was reading, the meaning was basically "(the family in) the house at night".

I checked your site for confirmation, but could not find anything so I did some searching. It picks up a lot of hits on Google, but quite a few of them were separating the two kanji; although they followed each other.

The reading was also picked up on Google. There are a few examples in your [A] reference, but no readings.

Anyway, I hope that is useful.

Oops. POS.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, リーダーズ+プラス

My first reaction was that this was just the usual 中/ちゅう suffix, and indeed it is. However it is very common (3.5M hits) and occurs in a few refs, albeit EJ ones. I guess it can stay.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>under exam, examination</gloss>
+<gloss>under examination</gloss>
+<gloss>under test (e.g. device)</gloss>
+<gloss>on trial</gloss>

alc

Thanks.  This has already been noted as Kansai dialect on another branch of this entry that is still pending approval/rejection.

http://www.weblio.jp/content/しらな�
%93%E3%81%A0
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/新方言

Obviously dialectal. Weblio says it's Tajima dialect (northern 
Hyogo, Tajima Province), Japanese Wikipedia says "Western 
Japan."

See below.

This picks up 1.4m Google hits. It comes up in a sample sentence on your site, i.e.,

あらまあ、ホント、全く知らなんだ。 Oh my, you're right, I didn't know that at all.[Amend] ,

but I cannot get the confirmation of the usage; unless the missing "い" is possible in this situation. If that were the case then with such high usage, it may be helpful to have an entry with a cross-reference to "知らない". in order to remove the doubt which may exist in the mind of the searcher. If there is another reason for the usage, then even more helpful to have that on your site.

submitting なんだ

I agree that this shouldn't be an entry.  It should be added to the entry for なんだ.  And なんだ/なんです might deserve a separate entry from なのだ/なのです.

See below.

Maybe that is the way to deal with it, but I was uncertain about the context of doubt [“what”] being associated with “なのだ” [in “なのだ; なんだ; なのです; なんです (aux) it is assuredly that ...; can say with confidence that”] and I also wondered if “なんだ” should even be included there. That was why I was wondering about the missing “い” which would give the “んだ” [explaining] “知らない [I don't know]. If the “(aux)なんだ” could also be short for “…なかった”, then it makes a lot of endings very uncertain as to meaning. One further point in the context of the text which I was reading is that the speaker of the dialogue constantly also leaves out the “い” in “いる” when it follows “-て”. However, I shall read-on looking more closely at text and context in order to see if I can confirm the Wiki comment in the author's usage of “知らなんだ”.
The other entry of “なんだ; なあんだ 《何だ》 (int) (uk) What!” does, of course, make total sense.

Many thanks for the feedback on my submission. It is always appreciated as I slowly travel the road of trying to understand.

That なんだ is a common (Kansai?) variant of …なかった. See the Wiki page http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/新方言 where it explains it thus:
    西日本に多い否定の助動詞「ん」の過去表現は本来「…なんだ」であるが「ん」と共通語「…なかった」が交じり合って「…んかった」という形が生まれ、「…なんだ」に取って代わりつつある。
    （例）知らなんだ→知らんかった 
I don't think this should be an entry. Perhaps the current entry for なんだ could have a second sense?

See below.

This picks up 1.4m Google hits. It comes up in a sample sentence on your site, i.e.,

あらまあ、ホント、全く知らなんだ。 Oh my, you're right, I didn't know that at all.[Amend] ,

but I cannot get the confirmation of the usage; unless the missing "い" is possible in this situation. If that were the case then with such high usage, it may be helpful to have an entry with a cross-reference to "知らない". in order to remove the doubt which may exist in the mind of the searcher. If there is another reason for the usage, then even more helpful to have that on your site.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

I agree.

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2099100">出入国管理及び難民認定法・しゅつにゅうこくかんりおよびなんみんにんていほう</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

See below.

Sorry for the repeat if you came across the other submission first, but if you came aross this one first then you will by this comment know that there is another similar submission.

I came across the above and in view of your comments, noted below, I thought that I should let you know about this entry.

Re: 出入国管理 【しゅつにゅうこくかんり】 (n) immigration control, you stated, "Why don't they just use "入国管理"? Not for me to say, but they don't. 
All the dictionaries, including the government's own "Standard Legal Terms Dictionary" say it's "immigration control", so who are we to argue? Coming the other direction, the リーダーズ+プラス EJ glosses "immigration control" as "(出)入国管理", among other things like 入国審査."

If this entry should remain in the dictionary, then maybe a cross-reference between this and "出入国管理及び難民認定法 【しゅつにゅうこくかんりおよびなんみんにんていほう】 (n) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act" could be included in order to avoid a misunderstanding.

Honyaku discussion, WWW pages

700k hits.

gg5, eij

although they only seem to have 'Tide' in proper nouns (e.g. the detergent)

GG5