@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

May be a problem.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柔んわり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

HiddenForm 柔んわり

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written 柔んわり</s_inf>

I get about 80 WWW hits, of which around half are from here. Very marginal. I'm demoting it to a comment.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>柔んわり</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,2 +11 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>irreg. use of 柔</s_inf>
+<s_inf>also written 柔んわり</s_inf>

meikyo says [vt,vi], but all my other refs (shinmeikai, sankoku, obunsha, iwanami) only have [vi]

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Fixed. They used to be merged, and this is a leftover.

There are 11 堪能 in Tatoeba. They have all been tagged 堪能(かんのう)
Shoukdn't it be 堪能(たんのう), the more common form?

Also Luminous, prog, nc

Hmmm. Best as a note, I think.

古潭 is used in the text of the wiki article for コタン, as well as in
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/神居古潭
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カムイコタン
etc.
----
it is also mentioned in the etymology of the name of this ramen chain
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/古譚_(ラーメン店)
----
i think it's fine to leave 古潭 here as 'also written as...'.  (potentially as a headword as ateji?)

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<s_inf>also written as 古潭</s_inf>

Yes, you are right to drop it.

nikk has 古い淵 for 古潭. daij don't list the kanji though they 
have the katakana. It's used is the wiki article, but not as a 
headword or otherwise mentioned in the text, only a redir. At 
most it should be an "can also be written as..." note.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>古潭</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +5,1 @@
-<reb>こたん</reb>
+<reb>コタン</reb>
@@ -12,2 +9,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>village (Ainu term)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ain"/>
+<gloss>village</gloss>

daij, luminous, 新和英中辞典, prog, ALC

@@ -24,0 +24,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25,1 +29,3 @@
-<gloss>to take</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (advice, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to accept</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to grips with</gloss>

But not everything is used ironically. It's worth recording when they are.

I don't quite get what it's supposed to be mean though. Is 
"darling" referring to the adjective or the noun? If it's 
the adjective, then the 2nd sense is essentially just 
"lovely," but then I think the question is whether an 
"ironic sense" that is the very opposite of the "actual 
sense" is really necessary to include? Isn't it a bit like 
adding "(used ironically) stupid" to 頭がいい?

It was put in about 5 years ago by Kanji Haitani, a native speaker who was active for a while on the project. I knew him quite well - he was a retired professor who did a lot of translation. I'm sure he was correct.

source for sense 2?

gg5

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>relation</gloss>

JWN, ALC
179k hits

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身より</keb>

番目	4538719	99.2%
番め	37993	0.8%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think this is clearer.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1604890">目・め・7</xref>
-<gloss>indicates position in a sequence</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1604890">目・17</xref>
+<s_inf>indicates position in a sequence</s_inf>
+<gloss>the nth ...</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<field>&kabuki;</field>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>番め</keb>

gg5, prog, daij

Added maths sense.
I don't think the x-refs are necessary.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,3 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1494970">不満</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1494980">不満足</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1494980">不満足</xref>
@@ -29 +26 @@
-<gloss>complacency</gloss>
+<gloss>gratification</gloss>
@@ -34,2 +30,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1493700">不足</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1493700">不足・1</xref>
@@ -36,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>satisfactory</gloss>
@@ -39,0 +36,7 @@
+<gloss>decent</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>satisfying (an equation)</gloss>

gg5, prog, nc

additional glosses probably help. also it should not be implied that sense 2 is limited to math (although that could make a technical sense 3)

@@ -27,0 +27,2 @@
+<gloss>contentment</gloss>
+<gloss>complacency</gloss>
@@ -31,1 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -33,2 +34,4 @@
-<field>&math;</field>
-<gloss>sufficiency</gloss>
+<gloss>sufficient</gloss>
+<gloss>enough</gloss>
+<gloss>adequate</gloss>
+<gloss>proper</gloss>

Hi, this is another "vs" entry where all definitions are nouns and the verbal meaning and transitivity is consequently unclear. For example, in this case it is not clear if 満足する means "to satisfy", "to be satisfied", or both.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -36 +34,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -44 +41,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

done w わ of the meikyo multi-sense vt/vi list, next word is 論判

mk

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -40,0 +43 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>settlement</gloss>
+<gloss>amicable settlement</gloss>
@@ -36 +36 @@
-<gloss>settlement</gloss>
+<gloss>court-mediated settlement</gloss>

疎覚え needs to be visible as it also appears on 2756630. See comments on that entry.
iK and rK shouldn't be used together.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

うろ覚え	410633	88.7%
うろ憶え	2219	0.5%
疎覚え	357	0.1% <= Koj
うろおぼえ	36478	7.9%
ウロ覚え	13502	2.9%

The other two could be SK too.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ウロ覚え</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

See 2756630.

@@ -8,0 +9,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>疎覚え</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog
うろ覚え	410633
うろ憶え	2219

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>faint memory</gloss>
+<gloss>vague memory</gloss>
+<gloss>dim memory</gloss>
@@ -16 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>faint memory</gloss>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１兆</keb>
+</k_ele>

OK, go for it.

Sounds all right to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#Current_usage

I want to make the case for removing all mentions of "short scale" and "long scale" 
for numbers, and only presenting the short scale. In every English-speaking 
country in the world, modern English uses the short scale. Since most people are 
not familiar with terms "short scale" and "long scale", the practical effect of 
including both is that people who look up the word 一兆 will not know whether it 
means one billion or one trillion without counting the 0's in the numerical 
representation. Getting rid of the long scale representation will make JMdict more 
reflective of modern English, and easier to understand.

If this change is accepted, I'll go ahead and change all the other entries as well.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>one trillion (short scale)</gloss>
-<gloss>one billion (long scale)</gloss>
+<gloss>one trillion</gloss>

GG5 & Eijiro associate the two. I don't have a problem with it.

ref seems unnecessary

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2645620">ナポリを見てから死ね</xref>

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

that translation is clearly inappropriate.  one is about the beauty of naples, the other is about the beauty of nikko.  link to the appropriate expression

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>see Naples and die</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2645620">ナポリを見てから死ね</xref>

GG5

Idiomatic English/European is “See Naples and die” (or “vedi Napoli e poi muori” for Italian), and this is given in dictionaries.

(Dunno best way to tag these shades of translations; I’ve tagged the literal one as such though.)

I’ve also removed the [obsc] – I have heard this phrase used (in history class), and it hasn’t been flagged as particularly obscure; it seems to be the well-known phrase associated with 日光市.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>see Nikko and die (lit: don't say "wonderful" until you've seen Nikko)</gloss>
+<gloss>see Naples and die</gloss>
+<gloss>see Nikko and die</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">don't say "wonderful" until you've seen Nikko</gloss>

nikk: その学校の創立第一年度の卒業生。
meikyo: 第一年度の卒業生。一期生。
gg5: (第)一期生　(one of) the first students to enter [graduate from] a new school; (one of) the first batch [cohort] of students at a new school.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>一回生</keb>
+<keb>１回生</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>１回生</keb>
+<keb>一回生</keb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1165580">一年生・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1165580">一年生・1</xref>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>first year (college) student</gloss>
+<gloss>first-year (university) student</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>graduate of one year's standing</gloss>
+<gloss>(one of the) first graduates of a new school</gloss>

Daijr: 第一年度の卒業生。

I don't see a problem with having all 4 of each.

@@ -20,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>graduate of one year's standing</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr

We currently have 4 -回生 and 4 -年生 entries. Do we really 
need all of them? 一回生 is in daijr (but then again they don't 
have a 回生 pref entry/definition so it makes sense to include 
it somehow), 1-2年生 are in daijs (but supposedly because they 
also mean biennial/annual plant) but neither has 3-4.

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1165580">一年生・2</xref>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>

Entry created

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>class A river (specified waterways of special importance protected by the government)</gloss>
+<gloss>class A river</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">specified waterways of special importance protected by the government</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>settlement (legal)</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>settlement</gloss>

Entry created

Probably should be split.

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>では無さそう</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +9,0 @@
-<re_restr>じゃ無さそう</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ではなさそう</reb>
-<re_restr>では無さそう</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2757720">では無さそう・ではなさそう</xref>

Should this be kept? If it should, should では and じゃ be in 
the same entry? Considering the recent じゃない and the fact 
that we didn't include ではない

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

lol what?
Correct as the translation may be, I find it difficult to accept this one as an entry worth keeping. It's just the presumptive form of では／じゃない.
Then again, 無さそう is already there.
If you insist on keeping this, then at least add では無さそう as an alternative headword.
JB: added では無さそう. The more the merrier.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>では無さそう</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>じゃ無さそう</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ではなさそう</reb>
+<re_restr>では無さそう</re_restr>

まず、出火場所なんだけど……どうやら建物の中じゃなさそうだ。

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>NEET (young people not in education, employment or training)</gloss>
+<gloss>NEET (young person not in education, employment or training)</gloss>

ニート	1635135

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

For Yahoo I get 39M vs 16M, but still "uk".

18m vs 1m

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

個目 and 番目 aren't interchangeable.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1482410">番目・1</xref>
-<s_inf>indicates position in a sequence</s_inf>
-<gloss>the n-th</gloss>
+<s_inf>forms an ordinal number</s_inf>
+<gloss>the nth (thing)</gloss>

I'd keep this (and 番目). They're a bit more abstract than 人目, 枚目, 匹目, etc.

I don't think this is needed. We don't have 人目, 枚目, 匹目, etc.

Trying to make this clearer.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>髙 as variant of 高</s_inf>
+<s_inf>var. of 高 where the central top portion resembles a ladder</s_inf>

Will be fine in Jmdict, but the comment may look odd in EDICT2 (WWWJDIC). Check it later and correct if appropriate.

* Add note and kanji (non-JIS)
Is there a way to have the character 髙 itself in here? (Now that non-JIS is acceptable, with care.)
* I’ve added back the note "髙 as variant of 高" which becomes the still logical " as variant of 高" without 髙 (admittedly looks redundant without 髙, but not misleading).
* Alternatively (or in addition?), we could put 髙 into the kanji field itself. This is what’s done over at 1884150 しんにょう for the road radical, which includes:
之繞；辶；辵；⻌
This has the advantage of degrading very gracefully, as it’s just absent if not supported.
The note does make the 髙/高 connection explicit, but is perhaps not necessary if 髙 is actually in the kanji field.
Same issue at 2739450 立つ崎 﨑 so probably best to be consistent.
(Came up when chatting with friend, when I learned that she had this form of the character in her family – she did use the term.)

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>髙</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<s_inf>髙 as variant of 高</s_inf>

Removing the note - it's non-JIS and causing a problem.

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>髙 as variant of 高</s_inf>

Apparently the hyphenated form is an adjective.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>var. of 崎 with 立 in the top-right</s_inf>
+<s_inf>var. of 崎 with 立 in the top right</s_inf>

Better. Just trimming.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>var. of 崎 which contains 立 in the top-right</s_inf>
+<s_inf>var. of 崎 with 立 in the top-right</s_inf>

I was confused by this as well. Does this work?

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>立 var. of 崎</s_inf>
+<s_inf>var. of 崎 which contains 立 in the top-right</s_inf>

No comments.

立つ崎	74

A possible alternative note might be "山立可 var. of 崎". Not sure about this entry.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>﨑 form of 崎</s_inf>
+<s_inf>立 var. of 崎</s_inf>

Sorry, but I don't think it will fly.

I think it should be rejected - the base form is really のか 
(which is already an entry), and な only comes after nouns and 
adjectival nouns

I agree with your comments about the difficulty of tying it down. The native speaker says it and understands it without even being able to explain it. A little bit like the old comment from a scholar [forgotten the name] who said, "I know exactly what "time" is until I have to explain it in any meaningful detail."

I am wondering if the following would be acceptable to you. If the searcher, like me, searches for the bit at the end of a sentence which reads "なのか" and comes up with nothing then that is a problem and leaves much doubt about what to do next.

If you amended the entry for "なの" to include "なのか", then even though there may be many shades of grey which cannot be covered, the general concept would be understood. So for example:-

なの (exp) (1) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with falling intonation) used to make an assertion; (2) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with rising intonation) used to ask a question; often followed by か　(なのか)

Then if in time anyone comes up with a better notion it can be revisited, but at least for the time the novice will find an acceptable answer. If however anyone concluded that "なのか"　definitely means something else other than stated above, then that someone should not have too much difficulty in providing you with an adequate submission, so to speak!

At sentence end, this is (just) なの+か, and probably doesn't warrant an entry. But it's all over the place, and I doubt a useful coherent entry can be constructed.
I'll leave it a few more days, but if nothing useful amerges, I'll delete it.

I have searched around for this in the same way that I did for "なのだ". You now have "なのだ" on the site and I thought that you may like to have "なのか"　as a suffix included as well. It picks up masses of Google hits. My best finds for meaning meaning came up on Google, for example:-

なぜ私は私なのか」（英:Why am I me ?）[WIKIPEDIA]

どこなのか」. → Where is ∼?

You have the following as a sentence end use:-

なの (exp) (1) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with falling intonation) used to make an assertion; (2) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with rising intonation) used to ask a question.

However, this does not help when the "なのか" is mid sentence.

If my searches have come up with the wrong result, perhaps your experts can give the correct meaning so that an entry is available to help the searchers.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>constitutive</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>constitutive form</gloss>

jst, life

There are currently 11 -型 entries which are adj-f, and 48 
which are adj-no. I think they should all ideally be the 
same..?

LSD, 医学英和辞典, Eijiro

Popped up in a Honyaku discussion.

I can't get confirmation. Without it it's just a collocation, so I'll withdraw it.

GG5, Eijiro

Second gloss is a guess - I'm seeking confirmation on the Honyaku list.

Yes, I guess this is the way to go.

koj, daij

split

OK, I have moved って言う/っていう into another proposed entry.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>っていう</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +10,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2757880">って言う・っていう</xref>

arguably, っていう can be written as って言う (which supposedly gets >1 billion googits), whereas っちゅう does not have a kanji headword.  therefore these should not be merged

GG5 (in several examples), Eijiro (ditto)

Will this work? (I had emailed feedback from Rick.)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>っていう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1922760">と言う・という</xref>
@@ -10,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>I mean</gloss>
-<gloss>or rather</gloss>
+<gloss>meaning</gloss>
+<gloss>called</gloss>
+<gloss>said</gloss>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1239285507
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1333393693
Weblio類語辞書: http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/っちゅうこと
Hits:
"っちゅうわけで" 700k
"っちゅうか" 6.5M
"っちゅうことは" 7.4M

っちゅう is just short for っていう/という (though it was a bit more trouble than I expected to track down the refs).

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2237220">日光を見ずして結構と言うなかれ</xref>
-<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

daijs ,nikk

copied gloss from x-reffed entry

Daijr, Daijs, Koj

Daijisen's quote is from the 萬葉集. Very topical...
Our second 形シク entry.

@@ -11,2 +11,6 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>lovely, beloved, sweet, adorable</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-shiku;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>lovely</gloss>
+<gloss>beloved</gloss>
+<gloss>sweet</gloss>
+<gloss>adorable</gloss>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?p=愛し&stype=1&dtype=0
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=愛し&dtype=0&dname=0ss&stype=1&index=115656800000&pagenum=1

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Eijiro, etc.

@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>hale and hearty</gloss>
+<gloss>full of beans</gloss>

daij, nikk

びんしゃん gets quite a number of hits, but a lot of them seem unrelated.

Meant to add this. 185k vs 20k. (kana is 699k)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>出かした</keb>
+</k_ele>

GG5 (example in 出かす entry.)

I guess the meaning is not obvious from 出かす.

daij, nikk, ALC

5k hits on Yahoo.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>社内ＮＥＥＴ</keb>

新語時事用語辞典, wiki, 知恵蔵mini (kotobank)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/社内ニ�
%BC%E3%83%88
http://r25.yahoo.co.jp/fushigi/rxr_detail/?id=20121101-
00026640-r25

"社内NEET" only gets 131 on b, so I skipped it.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>

daijs, nipponica, eij, 機械工学英和和英辞典, 脱原発和英小辞典, jst

Split from 2557100.

Have both for reverse searches.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Koshinetsu</gloss>

Might be more common as "Koshinetsu".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Koushin'etsu region (including Yamanashi, Nagano and Niigata prefectures)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kōshin'etsu region (including Yamanashi, Nagano and Niigata prefectures)</gloss>

I guess since we have entries for 四国地方 and 北陸地方, this is OK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kōshin'etsu_region

daijr, hatena
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/������

I was sure I'd checked  8-(. 古潭 seems to be mainly found in 神居古潭 and in ramen shops...

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

nikk, daijr

kanji confusion.  'old tale' is 古譚 (already an entry).  古潭 is 'old deepwater' or 'old abyss' or something

@@ -12,3 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>old story</gloss>
-<gloss>legend</gloss>
-<gloss>folk tale</gloss>
+<gloss>old abyss</gloss>

Daijr

Split from 1266240.

Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

@@ -12,0 +12,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>having no income</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,1 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>nothing to be attached to, nothing to be attained, lack of attachment, not to be seeking anything.</gloss>
+<gloss>state of nonattachment</gloss>
+<gloss>lack of attachment</gloss>
+<gloss>not seeking anything</gloss>

http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?
q=%E7%84%A1%E6%89%80%E5%BE%97

I am not sure how to write down the "References" part.