Oops. Needs a JIS-compatible "G".

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>Gパン</keb>
+<keb>Ｇパン</keb>

@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1064130">ジーンズパンツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1064130">ジーンズパンツ</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

This is also written Gパン. I put that into the kanji section because that seems to be the existing practice. For example Ｇメン, Seq: 2425180.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>Gパン</keb>
+</k_ele>

Daijr (confirms 和製)

Aligning gloss with ジーパン.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジーンズ・パンツ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>jeans pants</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">jeans pants</lsource>
+<gloss>jeans</gloss>
+<gloss>dungarees</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&anat;</field>

nikk

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いんきょう</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>a somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>a someone</gloss>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5, eij

@@ -14,0 +14,6 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>often used sarcastically</s_inf>
+<gloss>person of importance</gloss>
+<gloss>a somebody</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -15,6 +21,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>what kind</gloss>
-<gloss>how</gloss>
-<gloss>indeed</gloss>
-<gloss>truly</gloss>
-<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>certainly</gloss>

I think this entry could need some work. Eij example sentences 
could be a good place to start. Oftentimes, the usage is the 
same as 何者... 
”お前何様やねん" 171k
”何様のつもり" 1,580,000 results
etc.

sankoku, smk, iwakoku, shinsen, and obunsha only have this as [vi].
meikyo is the only one with [vt].

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 　謙遜　　 │ 166,616 │
│ を謙遜　　 │   3,499 │
├─ーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ 　謙遜し　 │  36,908 │
│ を謙遜し　 │   1,788 │
├─ーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ 　謙遜する │  10,954 │
│ を謙遜する │     557 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

謙遜な人	        684
謙遜の人	        45
謙遜な態度	472
謙遜の態度	94

I don't think adj-no is needed.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

This seemed to become a fork.

ワサビ	265338	66.7%
山葵	132404	33.3%
山萮菜	0	0.0% <-- wikipedia added this, for some reason or another. Seems possibly Chinese
和佐比	106	0.0%

Google shopping search for 和佐比 yields no results.  If it's not even used for marketing...
Twitter search doesn't yield anything but people throwing out "和佐比" as trivia(and usernames).
Wikipedia mentions 和佐比 specifically as an orthography recorded from ~800~1200a.d.

*only* appearance in all of wikipedia for  和佐比 or 山萮菜 is the historical note on the wasabi page itself.

IME won't produce 和佐比 (MacOS)
amazon.co.jp can't even match 和佐比 with wasabi

yourei returns two results, and they are both copies of the same text, which is a historical reference to the heian period orthography:
1. ワサビの語源については、平安時代中期の『本草和名』には、「山葵」の和名を和佐比と記している。同じく平安時代の『和名類聚抄』にも和佐比と記されている。

If you search on google, you get some hits.  They are:
1. Extremely historical texts
2. Mentions of the etymology of the modern term
3. People who have incorporated it on a lark into usernames on websites ("和佐比さんの手書きブログ")

I think on balance that it is counterproductive to display the form, especially for such a common term. (people should not learn or use it, and are unlikely to encounter it).

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

wiki

gg5

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>Japanese horseradish</gloss>

Pretty rare.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Fork

We could have a 2nd sense:
[col] horseradish
(I don't think it's usually a blend?)

Non-rhetorically, do you have any sources in mind where 和佐比 is actually used, where this surface form would be useful?   I couldn't find any that were not Chinese or Korean(and those are also few in number). Since everything I find mentions it only in passing as a form from the 平安 period, this feels a little like an English-Japanese dictionary providing glosses for Chaucer's English. 

On the other point,  if the gloss were "wasabi", I wouldn't have any objection.  "Everybody" knows that if you ask for wasabi in a restaurant, you're not going to get wasabi.  It's just that peculiarity of this dictionary in listing scientific names next to things the feels wrong in this specific instance. 

If you see　わさび on anything anywhere in Japan, 95% chance it's mostly western horse radish(which is much cheaper).  Anything that is *actually* wasabi is going to have to go out of its way to advertise "no, really, it is actually wasabi wasabi". 

So, it's nitpicky, but the note on the gloss just seems factually incorrect. And I would prefer for a dictionary to be correct, if there is a way to do that we can be happy with.

Reverting to our standard style for these sorts of entries. I don't see a case for the "colloquially any wasabi/horseradish blend", but if that's needed it could be another sense.
I'd like to keep 和佐比 visible with its ateji tag.

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +24 @@
-<gloss>wasabi (defined as Wasabia japonica, colloquially any wasabi/horseradish blend)</gloss>
-<gloss>Japanese horseradish</gloss>
+<gloss>wasabi (Wasabia japonica)</gloss>

I invite another way to approach this.  Seems silly to pretend that "wasabi" means "Wasabia japonica", as it almost never is.  (I know all the kokugos, and wikipedia, define it this way, but lets be honest...)

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>wasabi (Wasabia japonica)</gloss>
+<gloss>wasabi (defined as Wasabia japonica, colloquially any wasabi/horseradish blend)</gloss>

Incredible. The *English* wiktionary page notes the historic phonetic spelling, but not the Japanese page (this just how unimportant this is...)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/山葵
Japanese
山葵 わさび Grade: 1	Jinmeiyō  jukujikun
Etymology */wasapi/ → /wasabi/
First attested in the Honzō Wamyō (918 CE) with this kanji compound and phonetic spelling of 和佐比.  

(The kanji form is not otherwise searchable on wiktionary)

No reference on the Japanese わさび page:
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/わさび

Thank you, I appreciate the consideration and effort, this looks good.

Wikipedia doesn't really "have" this form.  It's not listed in the opening section as an accepted orthography. It is only noted as a historical artifact later in the article.
Headword: ワサビ（山葵[6]・山萮菜[7]、学名: Eutrema japonicum）は、...
History(名称): （918年）には、「山葵」の和名を和佐比と記している。同じく平安時代の『和名類聚抄』にも和佐比と記されている。

(山萮菜 was added randomly in 2021, I think that doesn't belong where it is either...)

和佐比 is not in nikk, it's not in daijs, it's obviously not in sankoku. I imagine it is omitted for a reason.

Sorry to repeat some numbers that are already in the notes, but:
わさび	1232009	75.6%
ワサビ	265338	16.3%
山葵	132404	8.1%
和佐比	106	0.0%

That's 106 of 1629857 occurrences, or ~1 in 15,000, or 0.0065%.  

And of those 106 occurrences, almost all are from reference materials(such as the 植物名辞典) that will have 山葵 or わさび right next to it.

The odds of encountering 和佐比 *by itself* as an attempt by an author to communicate the concept of "wasabi" seems infinitesimally small, unless one is literally studying classical Japanese texts.

Just on the numbers, this would ordinarily be an obvious [sK]. I certainly agree that [sK] shouldn't be purely a numbers game - sometimes terminology of historical/at-least-marginally useful significance is helpful to display.  This just doesn't appear to be one of those cases.

The reason that I put effort into this is that there is a cost to listing these forms in jmdict.  "Wasabi" is obviously an extremely common term. Students of Japanese will study it.  Every single person building a hand-made flashcard for わさび (paper or digital) off of this dictionary (or any of the many tools that use jmdict) has to decide for themselves if "和佐比" is worth learning(and if they lazily decide "yes", then they will waste additional time trying to learn a form that has gone mostly unused for hundreds of years).  

[rK], unfortunately, is insufficient to make this kind of choice. 磯巾着　いそぎんちゃく　"sea anemone" is [rK] at a little under 2%. It's still maybe worth learning, but rare enough that you probably should avoid it if you want a random Japanese person to understand your writing.  (This is an example I happened to be studying yesterday. 樹懶　なまけもの "tree sloth" is another fun one)

Put differently, if you write 磯巾着, a Japanese person might think you are overly educated, and/or have an unhealthy fascination with kanji (or sea anemones).

If you write 和佐比 for わさび, they will probably wonder what's the matter with you. (Since it's phonetic, they can probably guess the reading though わ　さ　ひ・び).

The amount of time wasted by thousands of individual learners adds up to something.  In exchange, what benefit does listing 和佐比 provide?  This is what is unclear to me.

Here's a big, colorful, example flashcard/study resource generated straight out of this entry(second page of a "和佐比" search)
https://www.tanoshiijapanese.com/dictionary/entry_details.cfm?entry_id=28918&element_id=201696

I'm not pressing the point beyond leaving these thoughts.  It can stay [rK] if that still feels appropriate to everyone.  But that is my motivation for "disappearing" some of these very, very rare forms.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ワサビ#名称
ワサビの名が付く近縁な植物としてセイヨウワサビ（ホースラディッシュ）があるが、加工品の粉ワサビやチューブ入り練りワサビなどでは、原材料にセイヨウワサビのみを使用したり、両方を使っていたりするため、日本原産のワサビを本わさびと呼び、これを使ったものを高級品として区別していることが多い。

I think this is better.

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1121660">ホースラディッシュ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2160220">西洋わさび</xref>
@@ -31 +33 @@
-<gloss>(any) blend of wasabi and horseradish</gloss>
+<gloss>horseradish (or any blend of wasabi and horseradish)</gloss>

植物名辞典 (has 和佐比), as does Wikipedia.
GG5, 中辞典, etc. all add Japanese horseradish.

Suggesting a second sense to cover Brian's issue. If this sort of information is appropriate, it shouldn't be in the literal sense.

@@ -24,0 +25,7 @@
+<gloss>Japanese horseradish</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>(any) blend of wasabi and horseradish</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -34,2 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

daijs (kanwa entry)
see also "日朝平壌宣言 -  Japan-North Korea Pyongyang 
Declaration" 
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日朝平�
%8C%E5%AE%A3%E8%A8%80

if it's an "n", isn't it automatically "n-suf" rather than 
"suf"?

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -29,1 +29,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +32,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1521200">北朝鮮</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>North Korea</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 反発　　 │ 3,451,963 │ 99.5% │
│ 反撥　　 │    17,653 │  0.5% │ 🡠 oK to rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ はんぱつ │     4,021 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

meikyo

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +42 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,4 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>to repel</gloss>
-<gloss>to oppose</gloss>
-<gloss>to revolt</gloss>
-<gloss>to react sharply (against)</gloss>
+<gloss>opposition</gloss>
+<gloss>rebellion</gloss>
+<gloss>revolt</gloss>
+<gloss>resistance</gloss>
+<gloss>backlash</gloss>
+<gloss>refusal</gloss>
@@ -28,4 +31,4 @@
-<gloss>opposition</gloss>
-<gloss>rebellion</gloss>
-<gloss>resistance</gloss>
-<gloss>backlash</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>rebounding</gloss>
+<gloss>recoiling</gloss>
+<gloss>repulsion</gloss>
@@ -35,5 +38,0 @@
-<gloss>rally</gloss>
-<gloss>recovery (e.g. in stock prices)</gloss>
-<gloss>rebound</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -41,3 +39,2 @@
-<gloss>to rally</gloss>
-<gloss>to recover</gloss>
-<gloss>to rebound</gloss>
+<gloss>rally (e.g. in stock prices)</gloss>
+<gloss>recovery</gloss>

Pass.

Daijr

Most of my refs don't break this into senses. Daijirin has 4, with N. Korea not mentioned, whereas the other three equate to aspects of "the North", so I feel the order should change a little.

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>North Korea</gloss>
+<gloss>the North</gloss>
+<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>the North</gloss>
-<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>North Korea</gloss>

Daijr
Saw a　news report on tv on 北の「日本人村」 
about Japanese in Pyongyang
"新聞やTVニュース等では北朝鮮のことを ”北” と漢字
で表すことが多くなっている様ですし‥"
http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q13
107100553

@@ -21,0 +22,10 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>North Korea</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the North</gloss>
+<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1521200">北朝鮮</xref>

Daijr

Most of my refs don't break this into senses. Daijirin has 4, with N. Korea not mentioned, whereas the other three equate to aspects of "the North", so I feel the order should change a little.

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>North Korea</gloss>
+<gloss>the North</gloss>
+<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>the North</gloss>
-<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>North Korea</gloss>

Daijr
Saw a　news report on tv on 北の「日本人村」 
about Japanese in Pyongyang
"新聞やTVニュース等では北朝鮮のことを ”北” と漢字
で表すことが多くなっている様ですし‥"
http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q13
107100553

@@ -21,0 +22,10 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>North Korea</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the North</gloss>
+<gloss>northern territories</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

daijs

@@ -20,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>north wind</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 中々　　 │  1,985,514 │  5.5% │
│ 中中　　 │     19,380 │  0.1% │
│ 仲々　　 │     23,322 │  0.1% │ 🡠 changing from iK to rK
│ 仲仲　　 │        326 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo)
│ 却々　　 │        649 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding
│ 却却　　 │          0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo)
│ なかなか │ 34,215,476 │ 94.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

仲仲 and 却却 only seem to be in meikyo. I don't see any usage notes.
I think it's probably okay to use [rK] rather than [iK]

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<keb>仲々</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>中中</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -13,2 +13,14 @@
-<keb>中中</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>仲々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仲仲</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>却々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>却却</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I think "negative verb" is a little ambiguous and that "verb in the negative" or "negated verb" would be better 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_verb

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>by no means (with negative verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>with a verb in the negative</s_inf>
+<gloss>by no means</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1297500">作為・2</xref>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>nonfeasance</gloss>

研究社 新和英中辞典, daijs

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<field>&law;</field>
@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>omission</gloss>
+<gloss>inaction</gloss>

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20121009zg.html
ルミナス

Fleshing it out.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>judicial scrivener</gloss>
@@ -17,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>scrivener</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">person qualified to prepare legal documents, handle real-estate transactions, etc.</gloss>

gg5: リンゴを丸のままかじる　eat an apple whole
丸のまま	        21384
丸のままを	174
丸のままが	92

Not really a noun.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I think we can drop 丸の侭.

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>丸の侭</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,2 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1216250">丸・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1585410">儘・1</xref>

丸のまま	21384
丸の侭	No matches
まるのまま	2842

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1216250">丸・まる・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1585410">儘・まま・1</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1216250">丸・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1585410">儘・1</xref>

GG5, etc.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20121009zg.html

Explaining what it actually is.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>administrative scrivener</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">paralegal qualified to prepare legal documents on administrative matters, e.g. immigration</gloss>

I agree. I have proposed an entry.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2750050">かたっと</xref>

IMO, かたっと[adv] should be its own entry

should かたっ be merged in here, or should it be a separate 
entry (as かたっと)?
daijr: "かたん
（多く「と」を伴って）堅い物が軽く触れ合って出す音を表す語。かたり。かたっ。"
プログレッシブ和英中辞典: "かたっ
　かたっと鉛筆立てが倒れた　The pencil holder fell over with a 
clatter."

merging in rejected 2744260

@@ -7,0 +7,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かたん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カタン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Entry created

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Tidying

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<re_restr>小蠅</re_restr>
+<re_restr>小蝿</re_restr>
@@ -18,0 +20,1 @@
+<re_restr>小バエ</re_restr>
@@ -25,2 +28,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1474210">蠅</xref>
-<gloss>small household fly (i.e. a fruit fly)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1474210">蠅・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>small household fly (e.g. fruit fly)</gloss>

hits
nikk

don't see how it's colloquial?

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>小バエ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +16,7 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こバエ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コバエ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,1 +26,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20121009zg.html

Apparently what they call themselves in English.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>social insurance worker</gloss>
+<gloss>labor and social security attorney</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

Looks like it means what it says, rather than being an idiom.

@@ -27,1 +27,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

I think it's case-by-case. I'll clear this now.

Was there a decision made on cases like this (i.e., a common noun--or expression--shares a name with a proper noun?) that were raised on the mailing list?

G n-grams: 24

Presumably obsolete.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>iron works</gloss>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>ironworks</gloss>

Oops.

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>てっこるしょう</reb>
+<reb>てっこうしょう</reb>

Entry created

daijs

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

リーダーズ+プラス

GG5:
中層住宅 medium-rise housing.
中層ビル a medium-rise building

@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>medium-size</gloss>
+<gloss>mid-level</gloss>
+<gloss>medium-rise (building)</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs
http://www.e-mansion.co.jp/bbs/thread/248786/
”(I live on)リバーサイド側の中層階ですが、 ..."

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>medium-rise (building)</gloss>
+<gloss>middle part</gloss>

gg5

merged with かたり

daijs

the sound of a hard object hitting something else lightly

I experimented with putting it in enamdict, then pulled it out because it's not really a name.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Samsung</gloss>
+<gloss>Samsung (company)</gloss>

hard to say.  if the much more common ~real~ name of the company is relegated to enamdict, a derivative (and derogatory) name should be as well.  on the other hand, サムチョン is not really a name.  there should perhaps be some kind of [informal] or [nickname] tag for enamdict

Not sure where to put it - here or enamdict.

605,000 results

maybe not strictly necessary.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

daijr, nikk, プログレッシブ和英中辞典
nikk: "ごまかし、気まずさ、恥じらい、いやらしさなどを含んで笑う声。"
could have an expl

Matching up glosses with 2749820 (下手をすると).

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>if things don't go well</gloss>

daijs, nikk, eij

koj, daijs

なきわかる was the old reading.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<reb>なきわかる</reb>
+<reb>なきわかれる</reb>

Leave 泣き別る for now. If Koj dropped it, I can't see it's really needed.

koj, daijs, nikk

870 hits for 泣き別れる.  may be worth keeping in that form.  i guess 泣き別る could also be added as v2

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>泣き別る</keb>
+<keb>泣き別れる</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>泣別る</keb>
+<keb>泣別れる</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<keb>鳴別る</keb>
+<keb>鳴き別れる</keb>
@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -20,1 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

Odd about Koj. It's not in my 5th ed, but my old (3rd, 4th?) edition has:
なき‐わか・る【泣き別る】
自下二  なきわかれる(下一)
Probably the entry is not needed.

Yes, according to GG5. They seem about equally common.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2746390">なんてったって</xref>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/なんて%E
3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6

http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/なん�
%A6%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6

I think that is the short form of なんてったって, isn't it?

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>in the end</gloss>
+<gloss>after all</gloss>

GG5

4.4M and 600k hits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>eyes</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>pair (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>pair</gloss>

I think these are more commonly referred to as "pairs" in 
mahjong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Mahjong_scoring_rules

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>two-of-a-kind (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>pair (mahjong)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 雀頭　　　 │ 7,938 │ 95.8% │
│ ジャントー │    86 │  1.0% │
│ ジャントウ │   258 │  3.1% │ - [ik] to [sk]
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong#Melds
"Eyes (also known as a pair) are two identical tiles which 
are an essential part of a legal winning hand. "

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>eyes</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<gloss>pair (as part of a winning hand, together with four melds) (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>pair (as part of a winning hand, together with four melds)</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>concealed winning hand consisting of chows, a pair that isn't a value pair, and an open wait (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed winning hand consisting of chows, a pair that isn't a value pair, and an open wait</gloss>

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>concealed winning hand consisting of chows, a pair that isn't a value pair, and an open wait</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed winning hand consisting of chows, a pair that isn't a value pair, and an open wait (mahjong)</gloss>

http://mahjong.wikidot.com/pinfu

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>having all one's melds as three-in-a-rows, a pair that isn't yakuhai, and an open wait (mahjong scoring combination with a concealed hand)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed winning hand consisting of chows, a pair that isn't a value pair, and an open wait</gloss>

daij

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>fissionables</gloss>

daijs, wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/核分裂�
%A7%E7%89%A9%E8%B3%AA

GG5, Eijiro

What an ugly noun. I think I'll split it in the interest of reverse lookups.

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>fissile</gloss>
+<gloss>fissionable</gloss>
+</sense>

daijs (核分裂性物質), eij, 機械工学英和和英辞典, jst

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

life, wiki, daijs, nipponika
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人工多�
%BD%E6%80%A7%E5%B9%B9%E7%B4%B0%E8%83%9E

daijs, life

daijs, life, wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人工多�
%BD%E6%80%A7%E5%B9%B9%E7%B4%B0%E8%83%9E

DBCLS, jst, life, 英和実験動物学用語集, cross, wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/分化能#.E5.A
4.9A.E8.83.BD.E6.80.A7_.28multipotency.29

ルミナス

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>if things don't go well</gloss>

daijr, eij
gets 469k, as opposed to over 3 million for the version 
without the を. (bing)
dunno if an x-ref is necessary though?

wiki, DBCLS, jst, cross
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/分化能#.E5
.A4.9A.E8.83.BD.E6.80.A7_.28multipotency.29
___
site:ac.jp "potency" "分化能" 69 results
among them: 
"内胚葉組織分化の解析I. : 内胚葉組織の分化能
Analysis of Differentiation of Endodermal Tissues. I. : 
Differentiation Potency of Endodermal Tissues "
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003331333

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>opposition to whaling</gloss>

eij, wiki
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/反捕鯨
"... 反捕鯨団体「シー・シェパード」 ..."
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/news/20121009-
OYT1T00558.htm?from=main8
205,000 results (bing)

eij, gg5

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>eye washes</gloss>
-<gloss>eye lotion</gloss>
+<gloss>eyewash</gloss>
+<gloss>eyedrops</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/洗眼剤

eij, gg5

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>invasive species settled on wild</gloss>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>naturalized species</gloss>

http://www.eic.or.jp/ecoterm/?act=view&serial=568

Moved to enamdict

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本気象協会

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無花粉杉</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>むかふんすぎ</reb>
+<re_restr>無花粉杉</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +16,5 @@
+<re_restr>無花粉スギ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ムカフンスギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,1 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>japanese cedar not producing pollen</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>pollen-free Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica)</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/無花粉スギ

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20121009zg.html
GG5, ルミナス

A missing paralegal category.

Our usual style for capital cities. (Although this may upset the PRC...)

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Taipei</gloss>
+<gloss>Taipei (Taiwan)</gloss>

daijr/s, koj, etc.

Interestingly, the pronunciation favoured by NHK news.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たいほく</reb>
+</r_ele>

OK here.

daijs, Weblio英語表現辞典
Google image search
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/掌底打ち

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>pung</gloss>

http://mahjong.wikidot.com/pung

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>three-of-a-kind (mahjong meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>three-of-a-kind</gloss>

daij
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刻子#.E5.88.BB.E5.AD.90

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>concealed pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>concealed pung</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>concealed three-of-a-kind (mahjong meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed three-of-a-kind</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刻子#.E5.88.BB.E5.AD.90

刻子 at least is [lsrc=chi:], though I'm not sure if this whole entry counts as from Chinese.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>concealed pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>concealed pung</gloss>

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>concealed three-of-a-kind (mahjong meld)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed pung (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>concealed three-of-a-kind</gloss>

daij
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刻子#.E5.88.BB.E5.AD.90

Same as 暗刻子, 刻子 at least is [lsrc=chi:], though I'm not sure if this whole entry counts as from Chinese.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>open three-of-a-kind (mahjong meld)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>open three-of-a-kind (meld)</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刻子#.E5.88.BB.E5.AD.90

Same as 暗刻子, 刻子 at least is [lsrc=chi:], though I'm not sure if this whole entry counts as from Chinese.

GG5

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>diplomatic recognition (of state)</gloss>
+<gloss>diplomatic recognition (of a country)</gloss>

eij, wiki, nikk, 情報・知識imidas, 現代用語の基礎知識

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>open three-of-a-kind (mahjong meld)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>open three-of-a-kind (meld)</gloss>

daijs
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/刻子#.E5.88.BB.E5.AD.90

Same as 暗刻子, 刻子 at least is [lsrc=chi:], though I'm not sure if this whole entry counts as from Chinese.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>(at sentence end) indicates emotion, admiration, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates emotion, admiration, etc.</gloss>

I think so.

daij

I think those are the correct senses in か and や that daij is referring to.

新和英中辞典

daij, nikk

Kagaku, 研究社ビジネス英和辞典

"jitter" is a common word in networking when referring to synchonozation, etc. - not limited to peer-to-peer systems. It can refer to both getting ahead and getting behind.
Latency is something else, but related.
BTW, there is no separate "comp" corpus - it is just the subset of the entries with "comp" tags.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>jitter (between peer-to-peer network nodes)</gloss>
+<gloss>time deviation</gloss>
+<gloss>time lag</gloss>
+<gloss>jitter</gloss>

it is very awkward, if i were use that sense i rather use レイテンシー instead.

cross: time deviation
EDR日英対訳辞書: 時間のずれ - a time gap
used as "my clock is off" in the 2 following links:
http://iphone4-land.seesaa.net/article/167432298.html
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/calendar-
ja/0Q75TL5mnd0
I tried but I couldn't really find any page where it seems 
to mean "jitter" or seems to relate to p2p networking

One of those things you pretty much just have to know, but googling the terms in both languages should show that the two terms are equivalent in this context

Maybe this is better in the computer science corpus, but I often wish everything was in one corpus. Is there really still much need to keep them separate anymore?

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>to win a hand (in mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>to win a hand</gloss>

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1352290">上がる・14</xref>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/和了
"和了る あがる" 400 hits. Similar (though fewer) hits for other kanji forms in the same way.
Ordered by hits

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>quarter-length game of mahjong consisting of east round only</gloss>
+<gloss>quarter-length game consisting of east round only</gloss>

風 is ホン or フォン when derived from Chinese　(google translates 
gives the Chinese reading for the whole word as "dōngfēng 
zhàn"

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>トンプウセン</reb>
+<reb>トンぷうせん</reb>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/トンプウセン
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/東風戦#.E5.8D.8A.E8.8D.98

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Mahjong#Shūgi

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>red suited tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit)</gloss>
+<gloss>red dora</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">red suited tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>red suited tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit) (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>red suited tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit)</gloss>

Making the "mahjong" a standard format for later turning into a field tag.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>red suited mahjong tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit)</gloss>
+<gloss>red suited tile that doubles the score of any hand (usu. a five of each suit) (mahjong)</gloss>

Daijs, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

リーダーズ+プラス, Daijr (かたん entry)

See discussion on 2077980.

Not sure about that long note.

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/dialect/2582/m0u/ 全国方言辞典 (okayama)
※ 「こげーな」「こねーな」とも。
こがーな	308
こがあな	184

こげーな	79
こねーな	1998 (no idea how many false positives, but the google results seem to mainly be for words with this meaning)

Maybe worth having after all.

@@ -3,0 +4,12 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こねーな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こがーな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こがあな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こげーな</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +22 @@
-<s_inf>Hiroshima dialect; about something/someone close to the speaker (including the speaker), or about ideas expressed by the speaker</s_inf>
+<s_inf>San'yō dialect; about something/someone close to the speaker (including the speaker), or about ideas expressed by the speaker</s_inf>

seems to be of questionable worth

こがぁな 	 No matches
こがぁいな	No matches
こがいな 	583 (mentioned in the 広島弁 wiki entry, but has other meanings)

Is this a keeper?

Aligning.

@@ -10,2 +10,3 @@
-<s_inf>Hiroshima dialect</s_inf>
-<gloss>such (about something/someone close to the speaker (including the speaker), or about ideas expressed by the speaker)</gloss>
+<s_inf>Hiroshima dialect; about something/someone close to the speaker (including the speaker), or about ideas expressed by the speaker</s_inf>
+<gloss>this sort of</gloss>
+<gloss>this kind of</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>such</gloss>

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<s_inf>San'yō dialect</s_inf>
-<gloss>such (about the actions of the listener, or about ideas expressed or understood by the listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>San'yō dialect; about the actions of the listener, or about ideas expressed or understood by the listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>such</gloss>

鳥取弁辞書 (weblio)
そがな	1341
そがいな	734
そげな	24148
そがぁな	No matches

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/広島弁
また、「そのような」はそがいな（そがーな/そげな/そんとな）

should prob be aligned with こねーな； こがーな； こがあな； こげーな； こがぁな

@@ -3,0 +4,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そがな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そがいな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そげな</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +19 @@
-<s_inf>Hiroshima dialect</s_inf>
+<s_inf>San'yō dialect</s_inf>

http://ameblo.jp/nm28899-mz/entry-11270900825.html
49k hits

The other form in the ref (そがぁいな) only gets 10 hits.

I don't know either. I can't see any enthusiasm for keeping or restoring this one. As for the others, I guess we need a proposal and case based around them.

On the other hand... Just heard こぎゃあ on the news, Kyushu (not sure if Kumamoto or Fukuoka) woman in her 90's. こぎゃあ雨が降ってる！ 
Or at least that's how I'd transcribe what I heard. (it was subtitled in standard Japanese as こんなに, but that's normal of course)
こぎゃあ is in nikk with this meaning but no hits in the ngrams...
Might be worth recording these as あがあ, あぎゃあ,あがい etc., I don't know.

I think it can be dropped. I've added it to the glossing file.
That 広島弁 page is interesting, but I think the terms are mostly too rare for a general dictionary.

I don't think this is needed. It gets barely any hits online.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/広島弁

あがいな/あがーな/あげな/あんとな
    あのような。指し示す対象を悪く言う場合に使うことが多い。
    （例）あがいなこと言いんさんなや。（あのような言葉、言ってはいけないよ）
    （例）あんとなもん、相手しんさんなや。（あのような人、相手にするのはやめなさいよ）
    上記の例文でこれらの単語の意味はほとんど同じである。また、「そのような」はそがいな（そがーな/そげな/そんとな）、「このような」は、こがいな（こがーな/こげな/こんとな）と変化する。

seems fine esp. if additional ways of writing it are added; the question is, is it worth keeping (and are there corresponding entries for そんな and こんな equivalents)