meikyo

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

6.5k bing

JST, Cross
26k hits

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>休けい</keb>

This entry has an interesting history. It began pre-2000 as:
元に [もとに] /(exp) (uk) under the supervision of/on the basis of/
In 2007 Rene changed it to の下に, quoting Daijr/s  for the kanji and noting that it was "more idiomatic" that way.
Shortly afterwards Paul Blay added の許に and split the senses.
I've come around to the view that this is probably adequately covered by 2004390 (下/許/もと). I've reindexed that sentence to the 元/もと sense as Robin suggested, and I'll touch up 2004390 a little.

I also wouldn't mind dropping this.

see comments below

temp approve

daij

I think this is clearer for sense 1.

@@ -16,2 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>losing points</gloss>
-<gloss>lost points</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1454590">得点</xref>
+<gloss>lost point (in a game)</gloss>
+<gloss>point given away</gloss>
+<gloss>conceded goal</gloss>

daij, 新和英中辞典

@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>losing points</gloss>
+<gloss>lost points</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -18,0 +24,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>blunder</gloss>
+<gloss>mistake</gloss>
+<gloss>error</gloss>
+</sense>

Broaden, I think.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>to hijack (a vehicle)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hijack (vehicle, account, etc.)</gloss>

This is also used to mean "hijacking (a social media, etc. account)" aka "my twitter was hacked". Should we 
include this as a separate tense, or make sense 2 broader? Or just leave it out?

GG5, prog, daijr/s

Most of the refs have a separate hijack sense.
I think we should do this as well, to show that the word isn't just being used figuratively.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to take over</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>to hijack</gloss>
+<gloss>to seize</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +29,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to hijack (a vehicle)</gloss>
+</sense>

Certainly not within the dictionary. It would be stretching things to have conjugations listed separately. In a morphologically heavy language like Japanese, where most of the verbs are very regular, I can't see any need for it.
I could potentially do it in WWWJDIC, but I have chosen not to. The exception is in the Text Glossing, where it is done by invoking rules. If you put in "乗っ取れる", it says:
Possible inflected verb or adjective: (potential or imperative)
乗っ取る 乗っ取る(P); 乗っとる 【のっとる】 (v5r,vt) to capture ...
I think that's about as far as one can go.

Oops.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>to breath out</gloss>
+<gloss>to breathe out</gloss>

Thanks. A lot of sentences are sense 3 and a few are sense 2.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

I've tried reorganising this entry. Sense 1 was too broad.
I've reinstated the "emit; spout; spew" sense (which was dropped in 2018 and moved to a new 噴く entry) because meikyo notes the following: "勢いが弱い場合は「吹く」が一般的。また、鯨の場合は「吹く」も使う。"

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to blow (of the wind)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +20,11 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to blow (e.g. wind)</gloss>
-<gloss>to play a wind instrument</gloss>
+<gloss>to blow (one's breath)</gloss>
+<gloss>to breath out</gloss>
+<gloss>to blow on (hot tea, candles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to puff</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to play (a wind instrument)</gloss>
+<gloss>to blow (a whistle, trumpet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to whistle (a tune)</gloss>
@@ -23 +36,5 @@
-<gloss>to whistle</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2836243">噴く</xref>
+<gloss>to emit (smoke, fire, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to spout</gloss>
+<gloss>to spew</gloss>
+<gloss>to puff out</gloss>
@@ -30 +47 @@
-<gloss>to put forth buds</gloss>
+<gloss>to put forth (buds)</gloss>
@@ -36 +53,8 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1602500">吹き出す・ふきだす・3</xref>
+<gloss>to appear (on the surface)</gloss>
+<gloss>to form</gloss>
+<gloss>to be coated with (powder, rust, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1602500">吹き出す・3</xref>
@@ -38 +62 @@
-<gloss>to laugh</gloss>
+<gloss>to burst out laughing</gloss>
@@ -39,0 +64,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to brag</gloss>
+<gloss>to talk big</gloss>
@@ -47,6 +76,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to brag</gloss>
-<gloss>to talk big</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5, etc.

Most refs have the "sprout" sense. Of the 89 Tanaka sentences, 88 are sense 1 and one is this (new) sense. It was wrongly set to sense 2.
I can't see the point of that 吹いた note either.

@@ -28,0 +29,7 @@
+<gloss>to sprout</gloss>
+<gloss>to put forth buds</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I don't think that note really adds anything

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>often as 吹いた</s_inf>

No, 白面 is not read すめん. It's an unfortunate combination, and I agree it should be split as you propose.

@@ -7,6 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>白面</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しらふ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,1 +11,0 @@
-<stagr>すめん</stagr>
@@ -25,2 +18,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>sobriety</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755870">素面・しらふ・2</xref>
+<gloss>sober face</gloss>
@@ -31,1 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>sober face</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755870">素面・しらふ・1</xref>
+<gloss>sobriety</gloss>
@@ -34,1 +28,0 @@
-<stagr>すめん</stagr>

daij

Not sure on PoS for everything.
Is there support for 白面 being read すめん? If not (and quite possibly even if there is), these look like they need to be split, in which case we'd probably want:
素面 すめん
[1][n,adj-no]
  not wearing a mask (in kendo, noh, etc.)
[2][n,adj-no]
  sober face
[3][n,adj-no][uk]
  sobriety
[4][n,adj-na,adj-no][arch]
  face with no make-up; unpainted face
  [see=1397190[1]]
素面；白面 しらふ
[1][n,adj-no][uk]
  sobriety
[2][n,adj-no]
  sober face

@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+<stagr>すめん</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>not wearing a mask (in kendo, noh, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -23,1 +29,0 @@
-<stagr>すめん</stagr>
@@ -28,0 +33,10 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>すめん</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1397190">素顔・すがお・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>face with no make-up</gloss>
+<gloss>unpainted face</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, JWN, 新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>締め括る</keb>
+<keb>締めくくる</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>締めくくる</keb>
+<keb>締め括る</keb>
@@ -16,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>to bind firmly</gloss>
-<gloss>to superintend</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +18,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to bind firmly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to superintend</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる・おそれる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・1</xref>

koj, daij, nikk

-merging in rejected 2755530
-listed in my sources as all the old-fashioned verb types, not v5r.  likely archaic outside of fixed forms like 恐るべき.

@@ -5,0 +5,6 @@
+<keb>恐る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>畏る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懼る</keb>
@@ -11,1 +20,8 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v2r-k;</pos>
+<pos>&v4r;</pos>
+<pos>&v2r-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる・おそれる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

gg5, prog, daij

Not a noun.
遙 is 旧字体.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>far away</gloss>
+<gloss>far off</gloss>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>far away</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +28,8 @@
-<gloss>remote</gloss>
-<gloss>far off</gloss>
+<gloss>in the distance</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>long ago</gloss>
+<gloss>long before</gloss>

slight lead for kana on bing (21m vs 15m for "-に")

ルミナス (only has kana in examples), GG5 (kana-only headword).

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijs

GG5, etc.

Sorting on hits.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>訊き返す</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>訊き返す</keb>
@@ -23,1 +23,11 @@
-<gloss>to ask in return</gloss>
+<gloss>to listen repeatedly</gloss>
+<gloss>to listen again</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to ask a question in return</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25,1 +35,1 @@
-<gloss>to listen repeatedly</gloss>
+<gloss>to ask for a repeated explanation</gloss>

Just adding the additional reading, which was in the text which I was reading. Difficult to tell with google hits because it automatically converts to "聞き返す". However, in context is matches. It follows the statement 「なんですって？」　with "と、(speaker)がきき返した。"

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>きき返す</keb>

gg5, prog

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>
+<gloss>terrifying</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>terrible</gloss>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>deplorable</gloss>
+<gloss>horrifying</gloss>
+<gloss>appalling</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +27,4 @@
-<gloss>fearsome</gloss>
-<gloss>formidable</gloss>
+<gloss>astonishing</gloss>
+<gloss>astounding</gloss>
+<gloss>staggering</gloss>
+<gloss>tremendous</gloss>
@@ -28 +32 @@
-<gloss>redoubtable</gloss>
+<gloss>enormous</gloss>

恐るべき	436597	99.5%
畏るべき	2211	0.5%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr, GG5.

Alt. kanji.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>畏るべき</keb>

[vi]: meikyo, shinmeikai, obunsha, sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 道草　　 │ 206,129 │ 98.5% │
│ 路草　　 │   3,181 │  1.5% │ 🡠 adding (koj, shinmeikai)
│ みちくさ │ 128,582 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>路草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2252740">道草を食う・みちくさをくう</xref>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2252740">道草を食う</xref>

daij, prog, Luminous

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>wayside grass</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2252740">道草を食う・みちくさをくう</xref>
@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>wayside grass</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, gg5

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>demotion</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>commutation</gloss>
+<gloss>demotion</gloss>

斎藤和英大辞典 (weblio)

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>reduction</gloss>
+<gloss>mitigation</gloss>

OK.

@@ -8,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>制作費</keb>
@@ -19,0 +16,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2751200">制作費・せいさくひ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2751200">制作費・せいさくひ</xref>
+<gloss>manufacturing cost</gloss>

製作費 could be "manufacture cost", while 制作費 couldn't.

Can you suggest glosses that reflect those different meanings? (I can't.)

I think I'm leaning in favour of keeping them apart, since 
they're not really interchangeable (as each refers to a 
different kind of production). Keeping them apart, we could 
have a redir to the relevant せいさく entry in each.

Not -> Note.

Time to close it.

Reopen, but not for long.

This has been around too long. I'm aligning the POS with 2756750 and closing. I'll  reopen for a bit if anyone wants to tackle a split/merge.

@@ -39,0 +40,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Can you set up that split and the ボッコボコ merge? I find it hard with just a tablet.

daij

I think ぽこぽこ should be split out (and ぼっこぼこ brought back in). ぼこぼこ and ぽこぽこ only partially overlap, and the meaning is 
not identical. daijr: " ぼこぼこ 一 ① よりも、軽い感じを表す語。"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>burbling</gloss>
+<gloss>with a burble</gloss>

Just adding the additional reading. It was in the text which I was reading. It gets quite a lot of Google hits.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目をひく</keb>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

Entry created

gg5, prog, daij

I think this is clearer.

@@ -21,2 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>tiny amount (degree, extent)</gloss>
-<gloss>paltry amount</gloss>
+<gloss>(this) small amount</gloss>
+<gloss>(such a) paltry amount</gloss>
+<gloss>only this much</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2755840">此れっ許り・これっぱかり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755840">これっぱかり</xref>

daijs for kanji
meikyo says colloquial

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>是っぽっち</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

I really think this should be glossed as a noun. Lots of これっぱかりもない/これっぱかりしかない examples in the refs.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>this little</gloss>
-<gloss>this few</gloss>
-<gloss>in the slightest</gloss>
+<gloss>tiny amount (degree, extent)</gloss>
+<gloss>paltry amount</gloss>
+<gloss>slightest bit</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

Nice catch.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>Money begets money</gloss>
+<gloss>money begets money</gloss>

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>金が子を生む</keb>
+<keb>金が金を生む</keb>

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない・わけにはいかない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない</xref>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>impossible to do (although wants to)</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot (due to external circumstances)</gloss>
@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>no way we can</gloss>
+<gloss>impossible to</gloss>
+<gloss>no way one can (do)</gloss>

Suggest aligning the gloss with the expanded 2057580. I think they should stay in step.

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>cannot afford to</gloss>
+<gloss>must not</gloss>
+<gloss>no way we can</gloss>

Pushing Google to its limit I get about 450 non-dictionary hits. Not that common, but I think it's worth keeping with the note.

I think we should ideally only include "incorrect variants" 
that are somewhat common, this one only gets 8,350 hits (on 
bing), compared to 624k for "訳にはいかない." If it's listed in 
a dictionary of incorrect Japanese it might of course be 
worth having, but if it's this book: 
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4883195228/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_STFG
qb1G7621X
then it seems as if it's based on non-native usage.

eij
93k

there's a TV show called "注文の多い料理人"
http://www.tbs.co.jp/program/chu-mon_ryourinin.html

eij 3 example sentences (注文の多い客 etc.)
337k (bing)

there's a TV show called "注文の多い料理人"
http://www.tbs.co.jp/program/chu-mon_ryourinin.html

Sorry, but I don't think it will fly.

I think it should be rejected - the base form is really のか 
(which is already an entry), and な only comes after nouns and 
adjectival nouns

I agree with your comments about the difficulty of tying it down. The native speaker says it and understands it without even being able to explain it. A little bit like the old comment from a scholar [forgotten the name] who said, "I know exactly what "time" is until I have to explain it in any meaningful detail."

I am wondering if the following would be acceptable to you. If the searcher, like me, searches for the bit at the end of a sentence which reads "なのか" and comes up with nothing then that is a problem and leaves much doubt about what to do next.

If you amended the entry for "なの" to include "なのか", then even though there may be many shades of grey which cannot be covered, the general concept would be understood. So for example:-

なの (exp) (1) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with falling intonation) used to make an assertion; (2) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with rising intonation) used to ask a question; often followed by か　(なのか)

Then if in time anyone comes up with a better notion it can be revisited, but at least for the time the novice will find an acceptable answer. If however anyone concluded that "なのか"　definitely means something else other than stated above, then that someone should not have too much difficulty in providing you with an adequate submission, so to speak!

At sentence end, this is (just) なの+か, and probably doesn't warrant an entry. But it's all over the place, and I doubt a useful coherent entry can be constructed.
I'll leave it a few more days, but if nothing useful amerges, I'll delete it.

I have searched around for this in the same way that I did for "なのだ". You now have "なのだ" on the site and I thought that you may like to have "なのか"　as a suffix included as well. It picks up masses of Google hits. My best finds for meaning meaning came up on Google, for example:-

なぜ私は私なのか」（英:Why am I me ?）[WIKIPEDIA]

どこなのか」. → Where is ∼?

You have the following as a sentence end use:-

なの (exp) (1) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with falling intonation) used to make an assertion; (2) (fem) (col) (at sentence-end with rising intonation) used to ask a question.

However, this does not help when the "なのか" is mid sentence.

If my searches have come up with the wrong result, perhaps your experts can give the correct meaning so that an entry is available to help the searchers.

Aligning.
I don't think the "also 中国 dial." note is helpful.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・いけない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1000730">いけない・1</xref>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>also 中国 dial.</s_inf>
+<gloss>bad</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>not good</gloss>
-<gloss>of no use</gloss>
+<gloss>naughty</gloss>
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・いけない・2</xref>
@@ -20,2 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>hopeless</gloss>
-<gloss>past hope</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb or adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>must not (do, be)</gloss>
+<gloss>should not</gloss>
+<gloss>ought not to</gloss>
@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・いけない・3</xref>
@@ -27 +26,22 @@
-<gloss>must not do</gloss>
+<gloss>useless</gloss>
+<gloss>no good</gloss>
+<gloss>bad</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>hopeless</gloss>
+<gloss>beyond hope</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>used to express sympathy</s_inf>
+<gloss>unfortunate</gloss>
+<gloss>a shame</gloss>
+<gloss>a pity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>unable to drink (alcohol)</gloss>

I'll make them "col" instead.
As for "せん" it could be an entry. It's not in any ref that I can see. I think it's too much of an outlier to go in the conjugation table.

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

These meanings are all listed as archaisms, but I wonder if that's correct. ”いけん” is also used as a conversational form of いけない -- from what I can tell, used only when talking to one's social inferiors, and mostly by men. But it's more of a verb form than a word and applies to all verbs (e.g., できん for できない) so I don't know if it should appear as a meaning.  On a related note, I came to this entry as I was trying to find a definition of せん, which it turns out is that conversational (superior, masculine) form of しない -- I'd not seen that before (私の名前など気にせんでいい - never mind what my name is).  Again, though, I don't know if it merits its own entry because it's just a verb form (although one that is not included in the verb conjugation table for する).  But from a user point of view, it would have been nice to find it in the JMDICT :-) Perhaps it is something that could be added to the verb conjugation table instead?

They are being kept separate.

ルミナス.

I think this should be merged with 1940480. If that is accepted, reject this one.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/制作費

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<re_restr>じゃ無い</re_restr>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<re_restr>ぢゃ無い</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

I've split off the kana-only more-colloquial versions. I think the "ik" was in the wrong place.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,9 +18,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃねー</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃねぇ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

even though it is "nokanji", i don't think we would normally keep a reading merged together with a headword with which it cannot possibly correspond.  じゃねー/じゃねぇ cannot match じゃ無い, so i don't think they should be in here.

i am more indifferent on ぢゃない, but given that it's marked ik, and corresponds to only one of the headwords, i think it should be split out

ぢゃない is pronounces the same way as じゃ
ない so I don't think it should be split 
out together with じゃねー.

じゃ無い	399899
ぢゃ無い	11231
じゃない	72991758
ぢゃない	140601
じゃねー	1458222
じゃねぇ	1103887

As these are more colloquial, perhaps they should go in their own entry?

I've come to the view it should go in. I think Rick's case is a good one, and I see lots of examples of it being used as a free-standing "awesome". Also there are plenty of 形容動詞 cases such as "現行ライダー恐るべしな者です。" which doesn't get handled well by the text glosser.

I could go either way. Certainly the refs only have 恐るべき, and examples in Eijiro and Tatoeba also. Yet Google claims 恐るべし has 2.5 times more hits. Doesn't make sense.

i don't think this should be an entry; べき and べし are alternate forms of each other.  we have 恐るべき and entries for 恐る and べし.  all refs have 恐るべき, none have 恐るべし

Found in Takemiya Yuyuko's "Golden Time 2", page 151.  I asked A. B. Tsunezawa, a translator recently moved to my area, and he replied:

恐るべき and 恐るべし sound almost the same as a meaning, but different as a function.
恐るべき is an adjective, whereas 恐るべし is not. Like other adjectives, 恐るべき will be followed by a noun, but 恐るべし can be placed in a sentence by itself.
 
Also 恐るべき can likely be meant negative such as "scary", whereas  恐るべし can be used to describe something in a positive way.
 
It reminds me of this English word "awesome," which originally should mean scary or dreadful. (But it won't be used as "The party was awesome.")
 
恐るべし can be used for someone who does (or did) something extraordinary.
 
 
Example 1 恐るべき
That 恐るべき criminal has run away from the prison and is still somewhere in town. 
(That "dreadful" criminal has run away from the prison and is still somewhere in town.)
 
Example 2 恐るべき
We need to prepare ourselves for the coming 恐るべき (dreadful) ID theft age.
 
Example 3 恐るべし
He did that homework in half an hour. 恐るべし!
(He did that homework in half an hour. He's amazing (awesome) !)
 
Example 4 恐るべし
He runs 5 miles everyday. 恐るべし。
(He runs 5 miles everyday. He is an incredible person!)

merged into 1496960

Daijr, GG5.

More common expression.

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>splash-splash</gloss>
+<gloss>splish-splash</gloss>

Given that "splash-splash" and "click-click" are just onomatopoeic expressions (rather than nouns), I think they're fine to have as glosses. "With a splash-splash" and "with a click-click" sound unnatural to me.

@@ -34 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>with a splash-splash</gloss>
+<gloss>splash-splash</gloss>
+<gloss>with a splash</gloss>
@@ -44 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>with a click-click (sound of camera shutter)</gloss>
+<gloss>click-click (of a camera shutter)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a click</gloss>

@@ -34,2 +34 @@
-<gloss>splash-splash</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">repetitive splashing sound</gloss>
+<gloss>with a splash-splash</gloss>
@@ -45,2 +44,2 @@
-<gloss>click-click</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">sound of camera shutter</gloss>
+<gloss>with a click-click (sound of camera shutter)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a snap</gloss>

daijs 研究社 新和英中辞典

I think it's this, not "disinterested" which means "unbiassed/impartial".

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>to be disinterested in</gloss>
+<gloss>to be uninterested in</gloss>

daij nikk

daij, nikk

daijs nikk

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +20,1 @@
+<dial>&ktb;</dial>

daij, prog

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

GG5 example.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>to settle a matter</gloss>

eij, 　実用日本語表現辞典　(白黒つける), デイリーコンサイス日中辞典
the question is whether this entry should have the を or not - 
without it gets way more hits (40k vs 7k on bing)

"Kick me, kike me, don't you black or white me!"

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>termagant wife</gloss>
+<gloss>wife from hell</gloss>

daijs, daijr, 実用日本語表現, eij

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

これっぽち 23 tweets past 24 hrs
これっぽっち 12 tweets past hr

Even with quotes, google just wants to show me これっぽっち results. It's possible this word is in the full version of nikk (which was 
up on yahoo in 2012 - kotobank only has the 精選版) - but it's possibly I misread nikk/typo'd. Maybe it's common enough to include, 
though.

これっぽっちの怪我で大騒ぎするな.　 Don't panic over a little cut like that.
これっぽっちの金で黙っていろと言ってもそれは無理だ.　 You can't expect me to keep quiet for such a small sum of money.

Yes, it's a variant of これっぽっち. Aligning glosses. Because これ has kanji, I don't think we should merge. 
In response to the anonymous commenter, although this is used in negative sentences, it doesn't necessarily translate to "(not) even a bit" - see examples (of これっぽっち) above.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2134460">これっぽっち</xref>
@@ -14,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>only this much</gloss>
-<gloss>only this little</gloss>
+<gloss>tiny amount (degree, extent)</gloss>
+<gloss>paltry amount</gloss>
+<gloss>slightest bit</gloss>

これっぽち	19032
これっぽっち	136091  [(n,adj-no) (col) (uk) tiny amount (degree, extent); paltry amount; slightest bit]

I can't see this in Nikk or any references. I'm wondering if it might be just a variant of これっぽっち, and possibly should be aligned with it, or even added to that entry as a [nokanji] variant.

wouldn't this be better as "(not) even a bit"?
it seems to be always used with a negative verb

51k (b)
wiki (redir to 墓)
ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/永代使用料
http://angel.1pat.net/archives/2005/10/post_31.html
"永代使用料とは、お墓を設置する「土地」を使用する権利です。
お墓の場合、「使用権」を買うだけであって、土地そのものを買うわけではありませ
ん。    永代使用料は他人に賃貸したり、売却することはできません。
また、途中で「移転したい」「不要になった」等の理由で解約しても、
永代使用料の払い戻しを行うことはできないので注意が必要です。"

gg5

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>intellectual profession</gloss>

研究社 新和英中辞典, jst, cross, eij
(latter three just have "profession")

used 133 daijs entries and 347 nipponica entries.
adding adj-no (like current 北部 entry)

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Maybe compositional, but KK is adding it - possibly for the reading.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see">一般社団法人</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755720">一般社団法人</xref>

Daijr, GG5, etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediary_corporation

法令用語日英標準対訳辞書, cross
http://www.moj.go.jp/MINJI/minji124.html

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, LW

daij, nikk

(it's in jitsuyo btw)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>まんめんのほほえみ</reb>
+<reb>まんめんのえみ</reb>

満面の笑み	272698
満面の微笑み	1166
満面のほほえみ	114

I suggest changing it to this

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>満面の微笑み</keb>
+<keb>満面の笑み</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>look of complete satisfaction</gloss>

May be a bit obvious. (The ref is for 満面の笑み). Probably don't need the "lit".

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">full-faced smile</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/満面
%E3%81%AE%E7%AC%91%E3%81%BF

See=満面 (http://gengo.com/wwwjdic/cgi-data/wwwjdic?1E)

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro

Longer form

はったつけんさ	53
はってんけんさ	No matches
発達検査	17212
発展検査	No matches

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>はってんけんさ</reb>
+<reb>はったつけんさ</reb>

eij, wiki, dbcls, jst
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/発達検�
%BB

発達障害	637687	96.8%
発達障がい	21146	3.2%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>発達障がい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?re=&vm=&id=3845

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>developmental impairment</gloss>

英和生命保険用語辞典, dbcls, jst, life, cross, eij, daij, nikk

hard to say if it's med.  i'm leaning against it

life, eij

注意欠陥多動性障害 in daijs, etc. (adhd)

med?

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>impossible to measure</gloss>

eij
987 results (b)
453k (g)
"測定不能レベル" 11.5k (b)

gg5, eij, nikk

i don't think 'legality' is correct here.  AFAICT, this term implies something has a 'law-like nature' not 'accordance to the law'

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>legality</gloss>
+<gloss>law-like nature</gloss>

nikk, jst, eij examples

listed as v4k in all sources.  koj has as vi,vt; nikk has as vt only

@@ -17,2 +17,1 @@
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&v4k;</pos>
@@ -24,1 +23,1 @@
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&v4k;</pos>

daij
Hits:
"縊く" -"縊（くび" 600
"経く" -"良経くじょう" 450
"絞く" -"絞（くび" 280

daij, nikk

daij, nikk

I don't think it's needed. It could go in the 此れ許り entry.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 此れっ許り　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ 是っ許り　　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ これっぱかり │  31 │  7.7% │
│ これっばかり │ 371 │ 92.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

Encountered this in a novel. Could perhaps be [nokanji]

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>これっばかり</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

OK

I don't think it's needed on arch terms but I think it should be included on obsc terms when it's obvious that the kanji form(s) would rarely be used (as is the case here). Looks odd to have rK on 此れ許り but not 此れっ許り.

I've been avoiding using rK on words that are obsc or arch. The hiragana is rare too so it seems better to leave off.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro

nikk, JWN
226k + 1k hits

First suggestion in my IME
Also saw as such in subtitles on TV

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シラフ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

daijs

not so sure about adj-no...

Reopening.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1397400">素面・すめん・3</xref>
@@ -23,0 +24,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1397400">素面・すめん・2</xref>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Split from  1397400. Approving to get xrefs, then reopen.