OK to go back.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摹本</keb>

I forgot to remove it.

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>摹本</keb>

Actually 摹本 needs to be removed as 摹 gets deleted, leaving just 本. 摹 is JIS X 0213.

Koj, Daijr

摹本 is OK, but as it's JIS0213 it won't get to EDICT and WWWJDIC.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摹本</keb>

daijr koj

* Alt spelling 摸本 (saw at temple as such, referring to picture)
* More general sense (dicts split into two senses as book vs. picture, but seems ok to merge here)
Dicts also give 摹本, but that looks *way* out of allowable kanji (seems to be in KANJIDIC2 though?).

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摸本</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>copy of an original manuscript</gloss>
+<gloss>copy of an original manuscript, picture, piece of calligraphy, etc.</gloss>

There was probably a など somewhere.

prob better without the etc.? Not really clear what it's referring to

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>inscription of a fantastic birdlike creature found on Yin and Zhou dynasty bronze ware, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>inscription of a fantastic birdlike creature found on Yin and Zhou dynasty bronze ware</gloss>

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>inscription of a fantastic birdlike creature found on Yin and Zhou dynasty bronze ware etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>inscription of a fantastic birdlike creature found on Yin and Zhou dynasty bronze ware, etc.</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1723510">文様</xref>

fork

reopen

see comments under 2491780
---
tmp approval for xref

@@ -24,0 +25,8 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>パシャッと</stagr>
+<stagr>ぱしゃっと</stagr>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>click</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sound of camera shutter</gloss>
+</sense>

I'm making it a separate entry.

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">ぱしゃぱしゃ</xref>

I have not changed the above because you may think that a separate entry should be created for "ぱしゃぱしゃ". However, I think that it could be incorporated in the above in some way. Perhaps in the "reading" and then in the "meaning" as "(ぱしゃぱしゃ, splashing, splashing around)"

"ぱしゃぱしゃ" was in the text which I was reading and the meaning of "splash, splash or splashing" would suit the context. It gets a good number of hits on Google.

Your "A" link gives confirmation. Your "S" link gives the following:-

子供たちは風呂の中でぱしゃぱしゃお湯のかけっこをしたThe kids were splashing water over each other in the bathtub.

@@ -18,2 +18,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2755540">ぱしゃぱしゃ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2755540">ぱしゃぱしゃ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・1</xref>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・2</xref>

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2755540">ぱしゃぱしゃ・1</xref>
@@ -22,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>splash</gloss>
-<gloss>sploosh</gloss>
+<gloss>with a splash</gloss>
+<gloss>with a splosh</gloss>
@@ -31 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・2</xref>
@@ -33,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>click</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">sound of camera shutter</gloss>
+<gloss>with a click (of a camera shutter)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a snap</gloss>

@@ -27,0 +28,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2755540">バシャバシャ・2</xref>

see comments under 2491780
---
tmp approval for xref

@@ -24,0 +25,8 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>パシャッと</stagr>
+<stagr>ぱしゃっと</stagr>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>click</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sound of camera shutter</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Aligning. According to daijs it's only this sense.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>fault-finding</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>telling-off</gloss>
+<gloss>rebuke</gloss>
+<gloss>lecture</gloss>

Hits in order: 235k, 2.7k

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お小言</keb>
+</k_ele>

FWIW 么 only arrived in the JIS standards recently.
I'll align the tan'yao in the メンタンピン entry.

断么 is in daijr/s; I shouldn't have added [sK]

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>
@@ -13,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>断么</keb>

http://mahjong-europe.org/portal/images/docs/Riichi-rules-2016-EN.pdf
  'Tanyao (All Simples) can be an open hand'
https://yakuza.fandom.com/wiki/Mahjong
  'All Simples / Tanyao'
https://riichi.wiki/Tanyao
  'Tanyao 「断么九」 or 「断幺九」 is a yaku, consisting of ...'


〈断／たん／タン〉〈やお／ヤオ／公／幺／么〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 断ヤオ　 │  1,510 │ 10.0% │
│ 断公　　 │    625 │  4.1% │
│ 断幺　　 │    348 │  2.3% │
│ たん公　 │     33 │  0.2% │
│ タンヤオ │ 11,571 │ 76.4% │
│ たんやお │    936 │  6.2% │
│ タンやお │    114 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think "tanyao" (without the apostrophe) is okay. That is how it is almost always written in translated video games, English-language documents and wikis (other than Wikipedia), online discussions, etc.

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+<keb>断公</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断幺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Drafting a change to have "tanyao" as a gloss, as discussed in entry 2753060.
If it's approved, 2749690・断ヤオ九 needs to be aligned.
I see in some entries we use "tan'yao". We should perhaps settle on one or the other.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>tanyao (winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing no terminal tiles or honor tiles</gloss>

I think we can handle that odd kanji now.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断么</keb>

I've come to the view it should go in. I think Rick's case is a good one, and I see lots of examples of it being used as a free-standing "awesome". Also there are plenty of 形容動詞 cases such as "現行ライダー恐るべしな者です。" which doesn't get handled well by the text glosser.

I could go either way. Certainly the refs only have 恐るべき, and examples in Eijiro and Tatoeba also. Yet Google claims 恐るべし has 2.5 times more hits. Doesn't make sense.

i don't think this should be an entry; べき and べし are alternate forms of each other.  we have 恐るべき and entries for 恐る and べし.  all refs have 恐るべき, none have 恐るべし

Found in Takemiya Yuyuko's "Golden Time 2", page 151.  I asked A. B. Tsunezawa, a translator recently moved to my area, and he replied:

恐るべき and 恐るべし sound almost the same as a meaning, but different as a function.
恐るべき is an adjective, whereas 恐るべし is not. Like other adjectives, 恐るべき will be followed by a noun, but 恐るべし can be placed in a sentence by itself.
 
Also 恐るべき can likely be meant negative such as "scary", whereas  恐るべし can be used to describe something in a positive way.
 
It reminds me of this English word "awesome," which originally should mean scary or dreadful. (But it won't be used as "The party was awesome.")
 
恐るべし can be used for someone who does (or did) something extraordinary.
 
 
Example 1 恐るべき
That 恐るべき criminal has run away from the prison and is still somewhere in town. 
(That "dreadful" criminal has run away from the prison and is still somewhere in town.)
 
Example 2 恐るべき
We need to prepare ourselves for the coming 恐るべき (dreadful) ID theft age.
 
Example 3 恐るべし
He did that homework in half an hour. 恐るべし!
(He did that homework in half an hour. He's amazing (awesome) !)
 
Example 4 恐るべし
He runs 5 miles everyday. 恐るべし。
(He runs 5 miles everyday. He is an incredible person!)

nikk, eij
斎藤和英大辞典 "塀越しに見る to look over a wall"

daij, nikk

ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゴミ屋敷</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ゴミやしき</reb>
+<re_restr>ゴミ屋敷</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>ごみ屋敷</re_restr>

ja:WP en:WP Japan Times
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ごみ屋敷
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsive_hoarding
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121027a5.html

Common news topic these days; heard in conversation too.

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/はるか遠くに

550K+400k hits. I wondered about (only) having the adjective (遥か遠い, etc.) but they get far fewer hits.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>遥か遠く</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>as far as</gloss>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -14,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>in the distance far away</gloss>
+<gloss>in the far distance</gloss>

This was in the text which I was reading. The first added reading is my preferred mode which fits in with the context of an English sounding expression referring to something which is far away in the distance, but which could also be "in the distance far away".

Your "A" link gives a good range of examples. Google hits are quite high.