transferred [spec1] to ために

Probably not. I just added のために to the kana dictionary used by "Translate Words".

are both this and 為に necessary?

gg5, daij

Splitting sense 1.
Doesn't specifically refer to Alzheimer's.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>fool</gloss>
@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>fool</gloss>
-<gloss>touched in the head (from)</gloss>
-<gloss>out of it (from)</gloss>
-<gloss>space case</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +28,6 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>dotage</gloss>
+<gloss>senility</gloss>
+<gloss>dementia</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -33,2 +35 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1604310">漫才</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1456930">突っ込み・つっこみ・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1316250">時差ぼけ</xref>
@@ -36,2 +37,4 @@
-<gloss>funny man (of a comedy duo)</gloss>
-<gloss>(in comedy) silly or stupid line</gloss>
+<gloss>touched in the head (from)</gloss>
+<gloss>out of it (from)</gloss>
+<gloss>feeling sluggish (from)</gloss>
+<gloss>not yet up to par (after)</gloss>
@@ -41,2 +44,4 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>Alzheimer's (impol)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1456930">つっこみ・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1604310">漫才</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>funny man (of a comedy duo)</gloss>

I agree.

@@ -11,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>暈け</keb>

I doubt 暈け should even be here.

makes sense, 暈ける is also kept separate from 惚ける/呆ける in 研
究社 新和英中辞典, 斎藤和英大辞典, jmdict and daijr (though merged 
in daijs). 
暈け is perhaps so unusual in these other meanings that an 
"also read as" is not even needed.

@@ -47,8 +47,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagk>暈け</stagk>
-<stagr>ボケ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>bokeh</gloss>
-<gloss>out-of-focus blur</gloss>
-</sense>

https://www.amazon.co.jp/b/?node=2131435051

I don't think "esp. dress shirt" is correct.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>shirt (underwear)</gloss>
+<gloss>shirt (undergarment)</gloss>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>shirt (outerwear, esp. dress shirt)</gloss>
+<gloss>shirt (outerwear; usu. with collar and buttons)</gloss>

daijs, 新和英中辞典, Luminous
daijr (sense 2): "普通ワイシャツをいうが、開襟(かいきん)シャツ・ポロ-シャツなどをもいう。"

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>shirt</gloss>
+<gloss>shirt (underwear)</gloss>
+<gloss>undershirt</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>shirt (outerwear, esp. dress shirt)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<field>&prowres;</field>

G n-grams:
タグ	27218180
タッグ	  564548

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

daijs

@@ -13,0 +13,17 @@
+<gloss>label</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>game of tag</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2071760">タッグマッチ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>tag-team match</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2753770">タッグチーム・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>working together as a team</gloss>

《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/拉麵

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">lamian</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">lāmiàn</lsource>

ordered by hits

@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@
+<reb>らーめん</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>

Aligning with our usual style for Chinese-derived words.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<reb>らーめん</reb>
+<reb>ラーメン</reb>
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -19,6 +20,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ラーメン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -29,1 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>ramen (Chinese-style noodles)</gloss>
+<gloss>ramen</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese-style noodles</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>sexual assault</gloss>

daij
研究社 新和英中辞典, 警察用語英訳一覧, 法令用語日英標準対訳辞書

"violation" is unnecessarily ambiguous

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>violation</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/業者#company

Often "company" is the best translation.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>company</gloss>

gg5, wisdom

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>businessman</gloss>
+<gloss>businessperson</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>maker</gloss>

土建業者- general (civil engineering and construction) contractor
ＫＯＤ追加語彙: 業者委託 outsourcing 《to another company》; contracting (work) to an outside company.
Google Translate has "it seems that a contractor will do the cleaning." for the last clause the previous comments.

The gloss "contractor" was removed in 2018. I think it should go back. Could be another sense.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>contractor</gloss>

廊下は、いかにも手入れが行き届いているかのように綺麗だ。床も磨かれ、映り込みすら見える。
……来る途中に、清掃服を着た人達を見た。
ぼくが通っていた中学などとは違い、私立の高校ともなると、掃除は業者がやってくれるらしい。

none of the glosses fit into above

Seems like a figurative sense that is missing from the dictionary. I 
found "delve" as part of the definition of 掘る in an older paper 
edition of GG. And here is an example I came across the other day:
アート、プロダクト、広告など、いろんなクリエイティブ文脈がありますが、今のクリエイティブにおい
て“デジタルのインプットを、どうアナログのアウトプットにするのか” そこは面白い領域であり、掘
りがいのあるテーマだと感じています。
http://www.fabcafe.com/blog/2012/06/01/fab-talks-02/

@@ -26,0 +26,5 @@
+<gloss>to delve into</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

came across this usage here: 
http://news.2chblog.jp/archives/51716517.html
(article of a sexual criminal being raped in prison in 
Taiwan)
comment: "日本でもあるのかな？レイプ犯はマジで掘られとけよｗ"
explanation:
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q106
1962845
more usage:
"ゲイの方は掘るか掘られるかの役割を固定しているのですか。もしくは時と場合により
どっちもこなすのでしょうか。"
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q134
9195543
”ホモセックスで掘るがわやってみたいけど相手がいない"
http://logsoku.com/thread/yuzuru.2ch.net/news4vip/1283835515
/

I think it should be explicitly stated that it's an act 
carried out between two men, not sure whether (for two men)  
is the best way to do it though.

@@ -28,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<gloss>(for two men) to have anal sex</gloss>
+</sense>

This entry has an interesting history. It began pre-2000 as:
元に [もとに] /(exp) (uk) under the supervision of/on the basis of/
In 2007 Rene changed it to の下に, quoting Daijr/s  for the kanji and noting that it was "more idiomatic" that way.
Shortly afterwards Paul Blay added の許に and split the senses.
I've come around to the view that this is probably adequately covered by 2004390 (下/許/もと). I've reindexed that sentence to the 元/もと sense as Robin suggested, and I'll touch up 2004390 a little.

I also wouldn't mind dropping this.

see comments below

temp approve

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2538020">恥の上塗り・はじのうわぬり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2538020">恥の上塗り</xref>

mk

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
上塗	18111
上塗り	105736

上塗り is the more common form.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>上塗</keb>
+<keb>上塗り</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>上塗り</keb>
+<keb>上塗</keb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>(final) coat (of paint, plaster, glazing, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>final coat (of paint, plaster, varnish, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>glazing</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>adding more of the same (e.g. shame)</gloss>
+<gloss>adding more of the same (of something negative, e.g. shame)</gloss>

Sorry but I really don't think it's opaque. It has one meaning and can be added to all sorts of things. If we had an entry for everything it could be added to there'd be thousands.

i.e. it's standard use of 費, yes, but it's very opaque for a foreigner and it's the kind of term that might need help to understand

https://lmedia.jp/2019/05/27/90237/
https://www.e-aidem.com/clp/part/sirason/entry/2017/10/06/151042
https://www.kanazawagoudoulaw.com/tokuda_blog/201808316434.html

I think it could be helpful to have an entry 親睦会費 because a foreigner worjing in Japan might wonder what it is

GG5, etc.
親睦会費	1682
親睦会	203489
費: （ひ） (n-suf) cost; expense

Sounds like the employer was docking income to pay for social gatherings. It's really just a standard use of 費 as a suffix. I don't think this entry is lacking, and it certainly doesn't seem to justify an entry for 親睦会費 itself. Anyone want to propose one?

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>convivial meeting</gloss>
+<gloss>get-together</gloss>

there's sth called 
親睦会費 and deducted on payrolls
this entry isn't very helpful
for understanding that

daij, 新和英中辞典

@@ -18,1 +18,8 @@
-<gloss>polkadot</gloss>
+<gloss>drop of water</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1371420">水玉模様・みずたまもよう</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>polka dots</gloss>

Fine.

daijs, gg5

I think the sense added in 2017 should be higher up. Daijr includes it in sense 1. Daijs has it as sense 2. Reordering. No sentences to worry about.

@@ -18,6 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>main body (of troops)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -31 +26,14 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>medium-level</gloss>
+<gloss>mid-level</gloss>
+<gloss>middle-ranking</gloss>
+<gloss>midsize</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>main body (of troops)</gloss>
+<gloss>crack troops</gloss>
+<gloss>select troops</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -42,7 +49,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>medium-level</gloss>
-<gloss>mid-level</gloss>
-<gloss>midsize</gloss>
-</sense>

I guess so. I note that most JEs just have one sense.

http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=中堅

@@ -41,0 +42,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>medium-level</gloss>
+<gloss>mid-level</gloss>
+<gloss>midsize</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -39,0 +39,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1388610">先鋒・せんぽう・2</xref>

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>shochu highball</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">cocktail of shochu with tonic water</gloss>
+<gloss>shōchū highball</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cocktail of shōchū with tonic water</gloss>

チュウハイ gets ~400k hits (cf 5M for チューハイ)

@@ -15,0 +15,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チュウハイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

nokanji always goes last

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ちゅうハイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちゅうハイ</reb>

* Reorder – all katakana is *far* more common (over 300:1 on Google; I’ve never seen mixed hiragana/katakana for this).
* Equivalent translation, make expl into such

@@ -8,3 +8,0 @@
-<reb>ちゅうハイ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +11,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちゅうハイ</reb>
@@ -20,1 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>shochu with tonic water</gloss>
+<gloss>shochu highball</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cocktail of shochu with tonic water</gloss>

daij nikk jwn

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>百代</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,12 @@
+<re_restr>百世</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひゃくだい</reb>
+<re_restr>百代</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はくたい</reb>
+<re_restr>百代</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ももよ</reb>
@@ -13,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>ages</gloss>
+<gloss>eternity</gloss>

jwiki: "スポーツチームにおける主将に次ぐ役職"

Added sense. GG5 has "subcaptain" but I've never heard that before.

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>second in command</gloss>
+<gloss>second in command (of an army)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>vice-captain</gloss>

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1388610">先鋒・せんぽう・2</xref>

Yes, Daijisen.

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=副将&dtype=0&dname=0na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=16002900

@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fourth athlete to compete in a 5-on-5 team competition (kendo, judo, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

52k vs 10k on bing

Hits in order: 180k, 3k

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まぐれ当たり</keb>
+</k_ele>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/不同意性交等罪#強姦罪と強制性交等罪、不同意性交等罪の違い
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2241

As of this year (2023), Japanese law has a single crime for rape that covers various circumstances. Before that, there was a distinction between "rape involving violence or threat" and "incapacitated rape". According to the kokugos, 暴行 refers to the former category.
In US federal law, the terminology is "by force or threat". Maybe just "by force" is sufficient.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,2 +28 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>rape</gloss>
+<gloss>rape (by force)</gloss>

I assume the intended nuance from "(violent)" might be similar to the typically-understood distinction between "assault" and "aggravated assault"? Of course the action in question is inherently violent, but we cannot deny that there is nevertheless a significant difference in *character* between the stereotypical "jumped in an alley" scenario versus the (tragically) more common "taken advantage of by someone you trust" scenario... Is there anyone familiar with how these distinctions are drawn in practice in, for example, Japanese law? What an unpleasant topic.

dictionary.com:
rape
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force ...

A fair point. Possibly the refs Marcus mentioned were making a pont we'd not really attempt in English.

👍

Thanks for the explanation. I don't have any objections to using
the field tags to mean specific terminology or jargon rather than
categorization, but until now I had no idea that was the
intent. (I finally understand why タンク isn't [mil]).

We typically only use field tags for terminology (i.e. technical or special terms). So 積分 gets a math tag but 数学者 does not. It has been suggested in the past that we expand the use of field tags to include all field-related terms but I'm not sure there's much enthusiasm for that idea. I'm quite happy with the current policy, which mirrors that of the JEs and English dictionaries.
Deciding what counts as "terminology" isn't an exact science, but simple A+B terms like 麻雀クラブ or 麻雀打ち wouldn't usually be tagged.

I thought the purpose of field tags was at least partially to
serve as metadata. For example, you can search "#mahj" on
jisho.org to bring up a list of all mahjong vocabulary.

If we're going to remove tags because they look redundant, should
we also remove the tag from 麻雀牌 ("mahjong tile"), 雀荘 ("mahjong
parlour; mahjong parlor"), 雀卓 ("mahjong table"), etc?

We're actually kind of inconsistent about this right now. In
addition to 麻雀, similar entries like 麻雀打ち and 麻雀クラブ
also don't have the tag.

Absolutely. The field tags should be dropped from 花札 and 相撲.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<field>&mahj;</field>

マージャン屋	2798
麻雀屋	2968

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>マージャン屋</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1885290">雀荘</xref>
@@ -14,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>mah-jongg parlour</gloss>
-<gloss>mah-jongg parlor</gloss>

nikk

"まぜじゃんや" 47 results (g) all spam spawn
 mahjong is the far more common spelling

@@ -8,4 +8,1 @@
-<reb>まあじゃんや</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まぜじゃんや</reb>
+<reb>マージャンや</reb>
@@ -15,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>mahjong parlour</gloss>
+<gloss>mahjong parlor</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>mahjong parlour</gloss>
-<gloss>mahjong parlor</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>

daijr: "古くは「だいしょう」とも"

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+<gloss>head</gloss>
+<gloss>chief</gloss>
+<gloss>leader</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +28 @@
-<gloss>leader</gloss>
-<gloss>local kingpin</gloss>
+<gloss>kingpin</gloss>

Makes no sense.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5
G n-grams:
 取引先   	1381187
 取り引き先	  10572
 とりひきさき	    586

reordering
adding [spec1]

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<keb>取り引き先</keb>
+<keb>取引先</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8 +9 @@
-<keb>取引先</keb>
+<keb>取り引き先</keb>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>business partner</gloss>
+<gloss>trade partner</gloss>

Shouldn't "business partner" be changed to "trading partner"? "Business partner" sounds like someone with whom you share clients, rather than someone who, as 取引先 indicates, is your client.

"アルプスの険" -english 85 results g

Not entirely sure [vt] is needed. Only meikyo, iwakoku, and sankoku have both [vi] and [vt] tags. 

daijr/s, koj, meikyo, and sankoku don't say that the -も- okurigana is optional. I'm tagging 身籠る and 身篭る as [io].

姙る was just a rare itaiji form. Probably not needed.

@@ -8,6 +7,0 @@
-<keb>身籠る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>身篭る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -18 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +19,9 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -34 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

sankoku, iwakoku
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ を身ごもる │  3,581 │ 15.5% │
│ を身ごもっ │ 19,455 │ 84.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 身ごもる │ 5,593 │ 42.5% │
│ 身籠る　 │ 4,347 │ 33.0% │
│ 身篭る　 │ 1,961 │ 14.9% │
│ 身籠もる │   415 │  3.2% │
│ 身篭もる │    24 │  0.2% │ add rK
│ 妊る　　 │   129 │  1.0% │ add rK (daijr/s, obunsha, shinkok)
│ 孕る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ add sK (daijr)
│ 姙る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ remove - i dont see it anywhere
│ みごもる │   705 │  5.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,3 +26 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>姙る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠もる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭もる</keb>

G n-grams:
 身ごもる	5593
 身籠る	4347
 身篭る	1961
 妊る	 129
 孕る	No matches
 姙る	No matches
 みごもる	 705

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>

gg5, eij

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>new drug</gloss>

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>a new medicine</gloss>
+<gloss>new medicine</gloss>

should it be "reddish brown" since it's tagged as a noun first?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

えび茶 actually gets more hits than the others on bing (13k vs 
9k (海老茶), 6k(葡萄茶)).
on google I actually get
"葡萄茶" 39k
"海老茶" 85k
"えび茶" 31k

daijr (葡萄茶)
daijs, nikk (葡萄茶, 海老茶)
prog, 新和英中辞典 (海老茶)
Luminous (えび茶)
Hits in order: 64k, 31k, 10k

@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>えび茶</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>葡萄茶</keb>

daijr

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だいりぼ</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<re_restr>好い児</re_restr>

好い児[いいこ] is in kojien.  seems harmless to include it

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>好い児</keb>

いい子	858468
良い子	553997
好い子	1170
いい児	111
好い児	92
良い児	65

I suggest removing the 良い児 kanji. If we should have one 児 kanji, it should be いい児, but it's not common at all - a 10th of a promille 
of the hits for いい子

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>良い児</keb>
+<keb>良い子</keb>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<re_restr>良い児</re_restr>
+<re_restr>良い子</re_restr>

daij

@@ -24,0 +24,3 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. in the passive, as ～に追いまくられる</s_inf>

GG, daijirin

@@ -23,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<gloss>to pursue relentlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in hot pursuit</gloss>
+</sense>

my ime, koj, daij, gg5, etc., etc.

looks like four non-edict hits for 追い捲くる, although my IME offers it.  so [io] at the very best.  追いまくる gets the most hits.

@@ -5,0 +5,6 @@
+<keb>追いまくる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>追い捲る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +19,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

duplicate of 良い子
unusual kanji (less than 2000 hits on google, mostly spam 
spawn)

daij, nikk

read as ひゃくや in 百夜参り (daij, nikk)

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a hundred nights</gloss>
+<gloss>many nights</gloss>
+<gloss>hundred nights</gloss>

As pointed out below, "sexual assault" is too broad. I don't think we need a second gloss.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

I added "criminal assault" 7 years ago largely because it is in the JEs. As I said at the time it's a euphemistic term. Since Brian rightly points out it can be somewhat misleading, I suggest adding the more literal equivalent.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1595494370459160577
Seven Michigan State players have been charged with criminal assault in connection with a tunnel brawl with Michigan players on October 29.

Or, search the news for "charged with criminal assault"

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/prince-georges-county/13-prince-georges-officers-charged-in-alleged-double-dipping-scheme/3142102/
Investigators were led to Finn shortly after an investigation into former county police corporal Darryl Wormuth. Wormuth was charged with criminal assault after allegedly grabbing a handcuffed 17-year-old boy by the throat. 

Obviously the term is also used for sexual assaults.

THE THIRD REPORT OF JAPAN
UNDER ARTICLE 44, PARAGRAPH 1
OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHT OF THE CHILD 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/child/report_a44.pdf
vs. 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/jido/pdfs/0804_kj03.pdf
"rape" is the translation throughout, ex:
１４１． なお、確かに、刑法１７７条（強姦罪）
141. While it is true that the offenses under Article 177 (rape)

I wonder if there is an issue here that we didn't used to charge men with criminal assault over brawling as much as we do today, and that "criminal assault" has lost an older implied connotation.

...

Came here to "correct" what I thought was an oversight, and saw that this was discussed and decided on deliberately.  If you see this term on jisho.org, it looks like:
(crime of) rape; criminal assault​ Law ("Law" in gray).

While the goal of "people will infer sexual connotations from the first term" is understandable, [law] appears affixed to the second term.  It's possible to read this as "colloquially used for [rape], but as a legal matter this is the general term for any criminal assault".

If you search "criminal assault" in jmdict, this is currently the *only* matching entry, which also increases the chance of misunderstanding. 

I don't agree that "criminal assault" is limited to an understood euphemistic reference for rape. If you'd asked me out of the blue, "what is criminal assault", I would have said "someone attacks/injures another in a fight and got arrested/charged."  "rape" would not have entered my mind.  If you say "the woman was criminally assaulted by the male perpetrator", inferences would obviously be made.  But "charged with criminal assault" is also what you'll get if one man punches another in a bar fight.

I was going to just insert "sexual" in the middle of "criminal assault", but I think Tom's point from 2016 was well made.  From a legal perspective "rape" in English (as far as I can see) requires penetration, as does the legal term 強姦罪.  "Sexual assault" does not.  I don't see the value of downgrading the term as a gloss. (people can do that on their own if they want)

And given that 強姦罪 *requires* penetration, "criminal assault" seems like a massive understatement.  I don't know what the other J-E dictionary motivations was here.  If eijiro and ルミナス exclusively glossed this as "criminal assault", that seems way off, and it's hard to imagine a reason other than not wanting to include sensitive English vocabulary in their dictionary. 

For comparison, the jmdictdb entries for レイプ and 強姦 are already glossed:
レイプ  rape; sexual assault​
強姦 rape; sexual assault​

In this case, as a matter of [law], this would appear to need to be

*** criminal sexual assault (including penetration)

I'm not advocating for or against such a gloss. That's a matter of everyone's sensibilities.

The value of including "criminal assault" (especially when we don't even have entry in jmdictdb for the actual legal equivalent), seems to me to be outweighed by the more serious issues attached to this term.  Translating 強姦罪 as "criminal assault" loses a whole lot of information, and blindly translating "criminal assault" as 強姦罪 could represent a massive error in modern use.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

ルミナス: criminal assault
中辞典: rape; criminal assault
GG5: rape; criminal [sexual] assault
Eijiro: criminal assault

AFAIK "criminal assault" is a rather euphemistic English term for rape. Obviously compilers of JE dictionaries rather like it. It probably should be added, at least for reverse searches. Having it preceded by "rape" should make the context clear.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?
re=02&vm=04&id=1960#ja_pt2ch23at4

According to the Japanese penal code, "sexual intercourse" has to 
occur for the crime of 強姦罪 to apply, so I think the broader "sexual 
assault" gloss is unneeded/incorrect.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>sexual assault</gloss>

nikk, eij

can't find any support for the 2nd sense

@@ -16,5 +16,1 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>rat-like</gloss>
-<gloss>rodential</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">order comprising the rodents</gloss>

"rhodential" is not a word

@@ -14,5 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>rat-like</gloss>
-<gloss>rhodential</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -22,0 +17,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>rat-like</gloss>
+<gloss>rodential</gloss>
+</sense>

Aligning.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>being suggestive</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21,3 @@
+<gloss>meaningful</gloss>
+<gloss>suggestive</gloss>
+<gloss>interesting</gloss>

daij, nikk
Hits (g/b):
"意味深" -"意味深い" 5M/1.5M

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

daijs
いみぶか:
http://ameblo.jp/takazaemon/entry-10165707721.html
"さっき、「SCANDAL」で桃井かおりさんが、意味深を「いみぶか」って言ってまし
た。それだけです。    読み間違い、流行りなもので・・・。   ドラマではまあまあ珍
しいこと。    これは麻生さんと違って、気を遣って訂正できなかったわけではなく、ス
タッフがスルーしたのでしょ。"

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いみぶか</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,1 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

こちらの話	18159
此方の話	153

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Closing.

Reopening.

Discussion on SLJ group.

This is sort-of the outcome of the discussions. I'll approve it to get it out there, then reopen.

@@ -16,1 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>talking to oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>matter being discussed (e.g. in a private conversation)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>our side of the story (in contrast to another's version)</gloss>

I think it's just a variant of "私の話" (which gets 9x the hits 
on bing)

Daijr

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="tha">bai ma-gkrood</lsource>

doesn't seem very common (most hits are for restaurant(s))
http://majin.myhome.cx/pot-au-
feu/dataroom/spice&herb/bai_makrut/bai_makrut.html
ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トムヤムクン

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Kaffir lime (leaves used in Thai, etc. cuisine) (Citrus hystrix DC., Rutaceae)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2108970">コブミカン</xref>
+<gloss>kaffir lime leaves</gloss>

Entry created

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コブミ�
%AB%E3%83%B3

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>こぶみかんの葉</keb>
+<keb>瘤蜜柑</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,5 @@
-<reb>こぶみかんのは</reb>
+<reb>こぶみかん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コブミカン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2108960">バイマックルー</xref>
-<gloss>Kaffir lime (leaves used in Thai, etc. cuisine) (Citrus hystrix DC., Rutaceae)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

斎藤和英大辞典, 研究社 新和英中辞典

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>phrase indicating that it is better to work for oneself than to work for someone else</gloss>
+<gloss>wretched is the lot of a government official</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">it is better to work for oneself than to work for someone else</gloss>

Entry created

nikk

@@ -15,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>something trivial</gloss>
+<gloss>worthless thing</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

つまらない物ですが	2349	13.2%
詰まらない物ですが	54	0.3%
詰らない物ですが	0	0.0%
つまらないものですが	15350	86.5%

I don't think we ned to inckude rK forms for set phrases/longer expressions even if they're in a kokugo (not sure which form is in koj)

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I was going to suggest deleting this but it's in kojien surprisingly.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>it's not much, but...</gloss>
+<gloss>it's not much, but ...</gloss>

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>It's not much, but...</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">phrase used when giving gifts</gloss>
+<s_inf>said when giving a gift</s_inf>
+<gloss>it's not much, but...</gloss>

@@ -19,1 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>"It's not much, but..." (phrase often used when giving gifts)</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>It's not much, but...</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">phrase used when giving gifts</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<misc>&quote;</misc>

Could be tagged both as proverb and quote, going on the def 
in daijs.
"神に対する務めと世俗の支配者に対する務めとを共に行うべきであると
教えたイエスの言葉。転じて、物事は本来あるべきところに戻すべきで
ある、の意で用いられる。"

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<s_inf>from Matthew 22:21</s_inf>

I'll drop the "quote" for now. It's in the database, but not in the DTDs, so I'd have a lot of fixing to do.

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&quote;</misc>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>it's a private matter</gloss>

Softening a little.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>none of your business</gloss>
+<gloss>it's not your business</gloss>

I do admit that "none of your business" sounds harsher in English to me than こっちの話 comes off in Japanese, though.

Also, the original gloss "talking to oneself" can work as a translation for this term in some contexts, but it probably doesn't fit as a dictionary gloss. Here's an example:
どうしよー…　あっ、こっちの話だから、気にしないで！
What to do... Oh, I'm just talking to myself, don't mind me!

jitsuyo
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1173465096
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/1539897
いや、こっちの話です (斎藤和英大辞典)
It is neither here nor there.

I suspect my addition is related to what was discussed back in 2012, but these are the glosses that I found useful. "matter being discussed" isn't the most enlightening gloss when you encounter こっちの話 being used on its own.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>none of your business</gloss>
+<gloss>it doesn't matter (to you)</gloss>

too compositional, no different from ご存知なのでしょうか etc.

Entry created

Agree.

Simple A+B

Entry created

178 hits - mostly edict.

compositional

Entry created

"エージェントの役割" -"agent role" 6,580
nothing seems to hint it's used as a computer term

Entry created

27 results on bing

Entry created

103 results on bing

Entry created

45 results (g)
a+b

Entry created

Have proposed adding 求職活動 as an entry.

35 results on bing
compositional

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>on-line job-hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>online job-hunting</gloss>

Entry created

Added 突出部.

21 results bing

Entry created

"カットアンドコピー機能" -"function" 63 results google

Entry created

84 results

Entry created

40 results on bing, A+B

Entry created

"情緒不安定な" 138k (b)

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Entry created

I guess it can go. I have expanded the 除く entry

Absolutely. I'm sure that "excluding Justin Bieber" gets plenty of hits too. (7.7k)

3560 hits on bing. but I don't quite see how it's necessary? 
it's just A+B

Yahoo reports ~8k hits, and I can see the first 1000 of them.
Strangely, it doesn't show up in the Google n-gram collection when I grep for the trigram "銀行 を 除く". Perhaps it's an expression that came into use since that collection was done (July 2007). I think it should be kept as amended.

Can you hold off possible deletion - I want to check something.

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>Cymothoidae</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">family of isopods</gloss>
+<gloss>Cymothoidae (family of isopods)</gloss>

@@ -20,1 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>Cymothoidae (family of isopods)</gloss>
+<gloss>Cymothoidae</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">family of isopods</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ウオノエ科

@@ -12,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>ウオノエ科</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うおのえか</reb>
+<re_restr>魚の餌科</re_restr>
@@ -15,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>Cymothoidae</gloss>
+<gloss>Cymothoidae (family of isopods)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1388610">先鋒・せんぽう・2</xref>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=次鋒&dtype=0&dname=0na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=23986400

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>second athlete to compete in a team competition (kendo, judo, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>second athlete to compete in a 5-on-5 team competition (kendo, judo, etc.)</gloss>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=次鋒&dtype=0&dname=0na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=23986400

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>turning (movie, novel, etc.) into a manga</gloss>
+<gloss>turning a movie, novel, etc. into a manga</gloss>

eij example sentences

@@ -13,1 +13,8 @@
-<gloss>making a caricature</gloss>
+<gloss>caricaturing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1526920">漫画</xref>
+<gloss>turning (movie, novel, etc.) into a manga</gloss>
+<gloss>making a comic version of something</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>make a caricature of</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>making a caricature</gloss>

gg5

I'm sure it also means "to turn into a manga"

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>triple run (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>triple run</gloss>

daijs, nikk
nikk: "マージャンの上がり役の一つ"
__
-"三色同順" "サンショクドウジュン" gets 52 results on bing
-"三色同順" "サンショクドージュン" gets 10

@@ -10,8 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>サンショクドウジュン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>サンショクドージュン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -20,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>having the same three-in-a-row meld in each of the three suits (mahjong scoring combination)</gloss>
+<gloss>triple run (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">winning hand containing the same chow in each of the three suits</gloss>

Change of heart (mentioned on the mailing list.) This is not the usual Chinese-derived mahjong term.

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>さんしょくどうじゅん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

It should have [nokanji]; that is the purpose of [nokanji].  If this reading is of Japanese origin (and I'm nearly certain that it is), then there's no difference between 三色同順[さんしょくどうじゅん,サンショクドウジュン(nokanji)] and any of our animal names like 鴨[かも,カモ(nokanji)].
-
The only time [nokanji] should be omitted for katakana is when the word is of foreign origin, which makes katakana the "correct" way to write it in kana.

daij, nipp, wiki, nikk, 電気制御英語辞典, 世界大百科事典 第２版, 
asahi shimbun keyword

[expl] part maybe not necessary.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&law;</field>
@@ -13,1 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>band of water typically be 12 nautical miles wide extending from the outer edge of the territorial sea</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/接続水域

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>to investigate (a criminal)</gloss>
+<gloss>investigating (e.g. a criminal)</gloss>

nikk koj daijs

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>forming a four-of-a-kind (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>forming a four-of-a-kind</gloss>

refs above
http://mjan.net/introduction/kan.html
http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/槓
http://www.mahjong-rule.jp/kiso/kan.html
"槓する" 8k hits

All other refs say that it's the act of forming a 槓子.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

nikk says it's an abbr of 槓子?

daijs
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/槓

oops, fork

I also don't think the シャーチャ reading is that much of a 
problem to include. The editors of nikk must have got it from 
somewhere, and there are many entries which have second 
readings which realistically only see minimal usage.

well... I think シモチャ should be either marked with [ik] or 
[nokanji]. If the case is being made that it is used on its 
own (I get 103 results for -"下家" "シモチャ" on bing), then it 
should be nokanji, like for animal species, etc., but if 
not, it should be [ik], like the らーめん reading in the ramen 
entry. Even if the all-katakana denotation doesn't go 
against mahjong conventions, it does go against general 
Japanese kana usage conventions.

Following Jim's ordering from 上家 for シモチャ;しもチャ.
The problem with シャーチャ is that it's telling people that that's an actual, used pronunciation in Japanese for this term. But according to all other sources and what I've seen of actual use, シャーチャ in a mahjong context is 西家 every time. Including シャーチャ in this entry as a regular reading is at the very least misleading.
How about this: since シモチャ/しもチャ is technically [lsrc=chi/p:], we split off シャーチャ into a separate entry with [lsrc=chi:][obsc] and a cross-reference to here, since its sources are nikk (not the best source for mahjong) and approximately 1 Google hit.

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>しもチャ</reb>
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
@@ -11,5 +11,1 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
+<reb>しもチャ</reb>
@@ -19,1 +15,1 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi" ls_type="part"/>

How about this?

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
+<reb>しもチャ</reb>
@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<reb>しもチャ</reb>
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

シャーチャ	  0

Mainstream mahjong term glossaries don't mention the original Chinese reading.
* https://majandofu.com/mahjong-glossary-shimocha
* https://mahjongcollege.com/term/5645/
* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/麻雀のルール#プレイヤー

The Encyclopedia Nipponica entry for 麻雀 mentions シャーチャ, but I think having "xiàjiā" in the lsrc field is sufficient.

Probably worthwhile to include the readings in the reference notes since they are ambiguous.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・かみチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・トイメン・1</xref>

I wouldn't object if  シャーチャ was dropped.

I don't think a [nokanji] tag on シャーチャ is right since it's just the Chinese reading of 下家 rather than an independent surface form. The corresponding Chinese reading on 上家 (シャンチャ) also doesn't have a [nokanji] tag.

I agree with Paul that these entries would be better without the Chinese readings altogether.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
@@ -20,2 +19,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・シャンチャ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・シャンチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

シャンチャ.  0

See comments on 2752940・下家

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,3 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・しもチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・しもチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・トイメン・1</xref>

Probably シャンチャ should also be [nokanji].

上家 is always read as かみチャ. シャンチャ definitely shouldn't lead.

Adding a "partial" flag to the lsrc, as is the case on 下家.

シモチャ has a [nokanji] tag, so it shouldn't be in the reference note.

Since mahjong is a game played with three other people (上家, 下家, and 対面), maybe a reference to 対面 is appropriate too.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
+<reb>かみチャ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>かみチャ</reb>
+<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・シモチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">shàngjiā</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi" ls_type="part">shàngjiā</lsource>

Messy. We don't split 下家.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・シモチャ</xref>

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>discarded tiles (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>discarded tiles</gloss>

Let's do it.

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>捨てパイ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>捨て牌</re_restr>
+<re_restr>捨牌</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すてパイ</reb>
+<re_restr>捨てパイ</re_restr>

1400(g)/4500(b) hits for "捨てパイ", dunno if it's enough to 
include the reading?

http://ma-jyan.itomenako.info/a/tumoto.html
"捨て牌" 192k
"捨牌" 67k

To enamdict.

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/習近平

GG5

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>qualifying competition</gloss>

eプログレッシブ英和中辞典, eij, jwn

http://4travel.jp/os_qa_each-37926.html
"基本的に日本のサービスは世界一のレベルで、
そのようなクオリティーを外国人に求めるのは難しいと考えたほうが無難です。つまり、トランジットのエアチケットのお客様の荷物を一度パリで空港に出し、再度荷物を
受け取り、目的地へ運ぶ、というのは一手間かかる作業だと推測出来ます。"
Neither of the previous glosses really worked for this use.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>extra effort</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙: レトルトカレーもひと手間かけるとぐっとおいしくなる. Even curry in a pouch tastes a lot better if you put a little extra effort into preparing it.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひと手間</keb>

daijs