I agree.

Same reasoning as the previous comments.  Suggest this be rejected.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Paul's first impression was also my own

I'm not sure what you're point is.  に is in Edict and 依る is in Edict and that should be plenty to handle に依ります.

によります　is not in edict

I'm dubious about this.  IMO, よる has the standard forms of による によって have expressions in Edict for just those conjugations.  よる on its own handles all the other forms.

I would suggest rejecting this change.

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

in edict:
に
関する
i've never really been sure about most of these entries that begin in particles anyway.  i think they're mostly useful here as expressions for people who want to look up particular grammar points.  to be honest, i wouldn't really mind if they were deleted and just acted as redirects to the entries for 関する, etc.  in any case, i agree with the rejection

not in edict:
に関します
に関しまして
に関し
in edict:
に関して

Same reasoning as the previous comments. Suggest this be rejected.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>

i also like leaving these as they were.

Not really, expressions like に対する have special entries in dictionaries (not just Edict, 新和英大辞典第５版 has に対する) because they are more common than other forms or have special usages.  You're right that we should probably have に対し, but again that's a special case.

missing に対し

I think you're right but then all of the variants should be entered into edict.

Same as による, I would suggest rejecting this change.  

に対して and に対する are two very common expressions that are fine, IMO, for handling _just_ those forms.  There is a separate entry for 対する that can handle everything else.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>

@@ -3,0 +4,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洋袴</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>段袋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +19 @@
-<s_inf>also written as 洋袴 and 段袋 during the Meiji period</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

http://resources.woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/customs/questions/americanbritish.html#wear

Adding the American English name.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>pants</gloss>

Yes; in wwwjdic.

OK. We have heaps of XXXに乗る examples.

I agree.

タクシーに乗る	50248
電車に乗る	249757
バスに乗る	221246 (an entry)
飛行機に乗る	143186

Needed? I suggest deleting this and バスに乗る

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

We've decide to cull the ...に乗る entries.

very.  but so extremely common that people are bound to search for it in both languages

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Obvious?

croissants aren't necessarily sweet! I think it looks good without an example.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>(sweet) pastry (e.g. croissant)</gloss>
+<gloss>(sweet) pastry</gloss>

Fair point. We may want to specify that it refers to sweet baked goods (as opposed to the dough or savoury pastries like Cornish pasties).

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>pastry</gloss>
+<gloss>(sweet) pastry (e.g. croissant)</gloss>

I do think we should include pastry in the first sense, or even as a separate sense. There's a discernible 
difference in the search results on google images for 甘いパン vs "sweet bread". Japanese Wikipedia 
describes a "Danish" like this: "デニッシュとは、パンの一種。" English wikipedia says "A Danish pastry, 
sometimes shortened to just Danish, is a multilayered, laminated sweet pastry in the viennoiserie 
tradition." I'm having trouble finding any English-language references to Danish pastry as "bread." On 
Quora (a site I definitely don't hold in high repute, but still), the consensus seems to be that a 
croissant is not a bread but a pastry. https://www.quora.com/Is-croissant-a-type-of-bread
enwiki, again, says that "Pastry is differentiated from bread by having a higher fat content"

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>pastry</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting on source language.
I don't think the "pastry" glosses are needed.
Should we drop the sense 1 note and instead add パン as a gikun reading to the 麺麭 entry?

@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>pastries (e.g. croissants)</gloss>
-<gloss>pastry-based products</gloss>
@@ -19,9 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1111160">フライパン</xref>
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">pan</lsource>
-<gloss>pan</gloss>
-<gloss>frying pan</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>panning (in a film)</gloss>
+<gloss>staff of life</gloss>
+<gloss>one's bread</gloss>

Deleted that sense.

@@ -21,5 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>to be queer in the head</gloss>
-</sense>

none of mine have it either

スーパー大辞林

I don't have any references for sense [3].  Can anyone confirm or deny it?

@@ -14,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>to not have got the point</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

should be labelled as expression.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Fine with me.

i agree.  put it in over there

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written as 喞筒</s_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/義訓#明治・大正

喞筒 is not ateji (in the strict sense) as the characters are not used for their sound. Rather, ポンプ is a gikun reading of 喞筒. See the Wikipedia article above for more (mostly obsolete) gairaigo gikun examples.
I suggest adding ポンプ[gikun] to the 喞筒 entry and dropping any reference to 喞筒 from this entry. See 洋灯/ようとう/ランプ for an example of how we've handled this before.

"I don't get the rationale for using notes for the reading ..". That's not the case here. (BTW, the kanji in 喞筒 don't have the reading ポンプ.)

It wouldn't really violate the rule since this word has a different etymology. I don't get the rationale for using notes for the reading, it seems pointless since they're not parseable and well, that's exactly what the reading field is for. If the issue is low frequency, there are ways of indicating its low usage.

に於ては	31730	0.4%
に於いては	104544	1.4%
に於は	118	0.0%
においては	7162249	98.1%

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<keb>於て</keb>
+<keb>於いて</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8 +9,2 @@
-<keb>於いて</keb>
+<keb>於て</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daij, meikyo

Aligning.
Not a conjunction.
Dropping 置いて. See comments on 1009550.

@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>置いて</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22 +18 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -25 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>at</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...において</s_inf>
+<gloss>at (a time or place)</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +25,23 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1009550">において・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as ...において</s_inf>
+<gloss>in (a situation, matter, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>on (a point)</gloss>
+<gloss>when it comes to</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding</gloss>
+<gloss>with respect to</gloss>
+<gloss>in (terms of)</gloss>
+<gloss>as to</gloss>
+<gloss>as for</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1009550">において・3</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as ...において</s_inf>
+<gloss>on the part of</gloss>
+<gloss>under the authority of</gloss>
+<gloss>in the name of</gloss>

unnecessary expl

@@ -28,1 +28,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">esp. giving a location on a notice</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

meikyo:
「げたつ」は誤読。

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>げたつ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

Just an x-ref.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1353850">上達・2</xref>

I'd leave it as it is. It's a very fine point.

i'm not sure.  the 'm' -> 'b' thing is pretty common (see さぶい, etc.), and while i guess it's actually an "incorrect reading of the kanji", AFAICR we haven't marked any of them as [ik] yet

Re-opening for comment.

スーパー大辞林

I think a merge would be in order.  But does the きび reading need an [ik] tag?

I'm approving this without one so we can do x-ref stuff now.

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1835720">好い気味・いいきみ</xref>
@@ -24,0 +25,7 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>きみ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1790980">気味・ぎみ</xref>
+<gloss>tendency</gloss>
+<gloss>propensity</gloss>
+</sense>

Rejecting this leaf.

I think it's a UK spelling. Wiktionary has this:    Nowadays, this spelling is much less common than humorous, even in regions where the spelling humour is overwhelmingly preferred.

This is the last one I am going to submit; someone should kill 
all these "humourouses" with a grep or something.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>humorous (sarcastic) comments (humourous)</gloss>
+<gloss>humorous (sarcastic) comments</gloss>

my own error and i am now following up on this submitter's suggestion to eliminate the "humourous" forms.  it is in fact in the OED but listed last as 16th-18th century form

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>humourous comments</gloss>

rather than grepping for all of them, it may just be easier for you to familiarize yourself with other spellings.  and yes, as Paul says, it's in dictionaries, e.g. as a spelling in the OED

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>humorous (sarcastic) comments</gloss>
+<gloss>humorous comments</gloss>
+<gloss>humourous comments</gloss>
+<gloss>sarcastic remarks</gloss>

It might not look nice, but it can be found in dictionaries (well, at least in Wordnet 3.0)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/humourous (wordnet3.0)

This is the last one I am going to submit; someone should kill 
all these "humourouses" with a grep or something.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>humorous (sarcastic) comments (humourous)</gloss>
+<gloss>humorous (sarcastic) comments</gloss>

[vi]: shinmeikai, sankoku

嘈囃【むねやけ】 is in koj. We currently have a note about it on the entry for 嘈囃【そうざつ】

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 胸焼け　 │ 133,386 │ 68.5% │
│ 胸やけ　 │  57,409 │ 29.5% │
│ 胸灼け　 │      35 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijs)
│ むねやけ │   3,793 │  1.9% │
│ むなやけ │       0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

web hits

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>胸やけ</keb>

koj, daijr, daijs, prog

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +22,8 @@
+<gloss>to be broke</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be gloomy</gloss>
+<gloss>to be glum</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

to distinguish from: 耳栓[じせん] earplug (traditional jewellery worn in the earlobe)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>earplug</gloss>
+<gloss>earplug (for protection against noise or water)</gloss>

Yes, I think the note should go.
I just noticed that I got v1 and v5r the wrong way round in my previous comment.

Reopen.

I left it there to try and differentiate between the (now) two 湿気る entries. Since it's obviously confusing someone, I'll remove it. I'll approve and reopen this for a bit.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>一段 form is mainly spoken language</s_inf>

I don't understand what the note is supposed to mean. Could it be clarified/be made simpler?

湿気る	8524  (v5  v1)
湿気ります	62  湿気ます  359
湿気らない	1124  湿気ない  3797
湿気りません	67  湿気ません  213
湿気った	4209  湿気た  10978
湿気って	6158  湿気て  17038

The n-grams are saying that 一段 forms are more common in the WWW. Yes, I think it's best to split. I see the kokugos say that both しける and しっける are 一段, but only しける is 五段.
Not sure the note is still needed. It's not mentioned in the references.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>

daij, 新和英中辞典
"取扱う" is in daijr

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to use</gloss>
@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>to carry</gloss>

kenkyuchuu; djr; djs; prog3e

split senses according to refs

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to treat</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24,17 @@
+<gloss>to operate (a machine, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to deal with (an issue)</gloss>
+<gloss>to manage</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to treat (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to deal with (someone)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>to sell</gloss>

デジタル大辞泉

Checks out with the ref.

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取扱う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>

卒える could be used to restrict its use to a particular sense, or to have a [note="usu. 卒える"]

了える also gets hits and is in meikyo and my kanwa jiten with that reading, so no iK needed, i guess

kanji can't be used with an expl tag either.  it can only be used in a note.  i think it's better split like this than together with a note

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>了える</keb>
@@ -21,0 +24,1 @@
+<stagk>了える</stagk>

If it's impossible to have kanji in the gloss, then I guess we'll have to split the entry. But I think that it might be possible to use an expl. tag.

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, etc.

I'll add "e.g." as I don't think it is restricted.

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>improvement (in skill, ability)</gloss>
+<gloss>improvement (e.g. in skill, ability)</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

Specify *skill* – this is not “improving business conditions” or “military progress”.

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>improvement</gloss>
+<gloss>improvement (in skill, ability)</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

Self-approving for x-ref support.

@@ -23,0 +23,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2567140">上通</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1185880">下達</xref>
+<gloss>communication of opinions of the general populace to those of high rank</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think いろ should be included as a reading. It's the sort of non-standard reading that would always be written with furigana. We don't tend to include them in jmdict unless they're especially common.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いろ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1356360">情婦・じょうふ</xref>
-<gloss>lover (male)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1356360">情婦</xref>
+<gloss>(male) lover</gloss>

情婦 already exists in a different entry.  no dic merges.  adding in いろ from your other suggestion.

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>情婦</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いろ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>lover</gloss>
-<gloss>mistress (情婦)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1356360">情婦・じょうふ</xref>
+<gloss>lover (male)</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

trying to differentiate from "粗描【そびょう】rough sketch".

@@ -19,1 +19,9 @@
-<gloss>rough sketch</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing</gloss>
+<gloss>sketch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>outline</gloss>
+<gloss>summary</gloss>
+<gloss>synopsis</gloss>

Moving the lsrc to the first sense. It will become entry-wide.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="san">dāna</lsource>
@@ -48 +48,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="san">dāna</lsource>

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>husband (informal)</gloss>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
+<gloss>husband</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>used to address a male patron, customer, or person of high status</s_inf>
@@ -33 +34,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">word used to address a male patron, customer, or person of high status</gloss>

@@ -29,1 +29,5 @@
-<gloss>word used to address a male patron, customer, or person of high status (sir, boss, master, governor)</gloss>
+<gloss>sir</gloss>
+<gloss>boss</gloss>
+<gloss>master</gloss>
+<gloss>governor</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">word used to address a male patron, customer, or person of high status</gloss>

@@ -33,1 +33,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1101990">パトロン・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1101990">パトロン・2</xref>

i doubt having 'jealousy' hurts if it's a gloss toward the end.  certainly appropriate in some translations

The main meaning in the jdics is going mad/losing one's reason (理性) because of love/amorous feelings. Jealousy fits in with this. This term seems to be used esp in correlation with crime.

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>being struck mad by love</gloss>
+<gloss>foolish passion</gloss>
@@ -15,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>lust</gloss>
+<gloss>jealousy</gloss>

新和英大辞典
プログレッシブ和英中辞典

Quite a few dictionaries have 'jealousy' but I think that is a bit out.

@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>infatuation</gloss>
+<gloss>lust</gloss>

Could be improved.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1635380">情痴</xref>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>owner (e.g. of an hotel)</gloss>
+<gloss>owner (e.g. of a hotel)</gloss>

glosses could be split differently

daij gg5

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>household head</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>host</gloss>
-<gloss>landlord</gloss>
+<gloss>host (e.g. of a tea gathering)</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +22,4 @@
+<gloss>owner (e.g. of an hotel)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

スーパー大辞林

@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1605280">元々</xref>
+<s_inf>often in negative contexts</s_inf>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +22,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>from the beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>from the outset</gloss>
+<gloss>by nature</gloss>
+</sense>

Re-opening for comment.

スーパー大辞林

Approving for x-ref support

@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2567050">禅宗様</xref>
+<gloss>traditional architecture associated with Zen</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>a scoop</gloss>
+<gloss>scoop</gloss>

also swapping headwords--used to distinguish from 特種[とくしゅ]

@@ -5,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>特ダネ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>特ダネ</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とくダネ</reb>
+<re_restr>特ダネ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<re_restr>特種</re_restr>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>特ダネ</keb>

No comments on my suggestion?  I guess it isn't going anywhere so I'll self-reject.

There is a separate entry 
http://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&q=2270030.1
that is a 'redirect' entry pointing to here.  Presumably that was done because 乃 is going to be confusing to many people learning Japanese (heck, probably a bunch of people who _are_ Japanese as well ;-)

I suggest that instead the kanji headword should be moved from this (main) entry to the 'redirect' entry.  国語 dictionaries typically won't have an entry for 乃, but have の without a kanji headword.

NOTE: I can't actually remove the kanji headword 乃 until the x-ref pointing here is removed.

Sense 2 needed more; just romaji is useless.
Probably [poet] for sense 3.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

daijs defn for 俳諧
https://kotobank.jp/word/俳諧-112719
１ こっけい。おかしみ。たわむれ。
２ 俳句（発句ほっく）・連句および俳文などの総称。
３ 「俳諧の連歌」の略。
４ 「俳諧歌はいかいか」の略。

俳諧	86437	98.2%
正統の連歌	0	0.0%  (orthodox renga, used in wikipedia, not common)
俳諧の連歌	590	0.7%
俳諧連歌	993	1.1%

Depending on opinions on my edit to 俳諧の連歌, not sure what you'd actually want to do with [2]. 

Seems [2] should be [hist] (limited to discussion of poetry development). Outside of historical discussion, one would probably assume [1].

I'm not sure [3] is actually archaic. (wiktionary only gives the poetic sense, not in sankoku)  But it's elucidating to have one way or the other. Definitely in daijs as the first entry.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>
@@ -28 +27,8 @@
-<gloss>humorous or vulgar renga poetry</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>absurd</gloss>
+<gloss>comical</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 俳諧　　 | 86,437 | 98.2% |
| 誹諧　　 |  1,611 |  1.8% | <- daijr/s, koj, mk, etc.
| はいかい | 14,614 |  N/A  |

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>haikai</gloss>
-<gloss>collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai (collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>

新和英大辞典

Why not make it 'poor farmer' to increase the number of words it will be 'caught' on?

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>poor peasant</gloss>
+<gloss>poor farmer</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>poor peasant</gloss>

adding x-ref as well

@@ -21,0 +21,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1634450">良人・りょうじん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1634450">良人・りょうじん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1634450">良人・りょうじん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1634450">良人・りょうじん</xref>

can't be marked as gikun, unfortunately.  best that can be done is to mark it as 
[iK] or place it in a note

I doubt it's very common. I think that it's also gikun.

スーパー大辞林

Didn't know that one.

daij koj

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>良人</keb>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

Indeed. Thanks.

typo?

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to pock holes (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pick holes (in)</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj

@@ -22,4 +22,14 @@
-<gloss>to find fault with</gloss>
-<gloss>to rain on someone's parade</gloss>
-<gloss>to nitpick</gloss>
-<gloss>to quibble</gloss>
+<gloss>to find fault (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cavil (at)</gloss>
+<gloss>to carp (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to complain</gloss>
+<gloss>to pock holes (in)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to throw a wet blanket (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw cold water (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>to jinx</gloss>
+<gloss>to cast a bad omen (on)</gloss>

Yes, "one's" wasn't quite correct,

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to rain on someone's parade</gloss>

daij

This is similar to yorokonde but is only used with giving verbs

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to be glad (to give, to get rid of)</gloss>

大辞林

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to make a gift of</gloss>
+<gloss>to happily give away</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

gg5

Don't need the x-ref.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1418160">担当</xref>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>(one's) assignment</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) job</gloss>

91 page hits for "受持の先生"

@@ -25,0 +25,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418160">担当</xref>

E.G. www.books.x0.com/kozakura/text78.shtml

@@ -12,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>受持</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Used in a Tanaka example.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頻ぴん</keb>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>

Please submit new entries as new, not as amendments to existing entries.

An additional term which could be added to the dictionary is　目を丸くする, meaning "to stare" or variations thereof.  Here is one page with definitions:

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/目を丸くする

or

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/目を丸くする

Just an x-ref

@@ -64,0 +64,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2040000">大きめ</xref>

@@ -34,0 +34,2 @@
+<gloss>sight</gloss>
+<gloss>vision</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +40,2 @@
+<gloss>stare</gloss>
+<gloss>glance</gloss>

https://10330.co.jp/maniac-paper/
今さら聞けない「紙の目」の話　T目・Y目を簡単解説（永久保存版）

@@ -82 +82 @@
-<gloss>grain (of wood)</gloss>
+<gloss>grain (of wood, paper)</gloss>

Tidying.

@@ -63 +63 @@
-<gloss>appearance</gloss>
+<gloss>(an) appearance</gloss>
@@ -68,2 +68,2 @@
-<gloss>chance to succeed</gloss>
-<gloss>possibility</gloss>
+<gloss>chance (of success)</gloss>
+<gloss>possibility (of a good result)</gloss>
@@ -91 +91 @@
-<gloss>square (on a chess board)</gloss>
+<gloss>square (on a chessboard)</gloss>
@@ -116 +116 @@
-<s_inf>after adj. stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after adjective stem</s_inf>
@@ -123 +123,2 @@
-<s_inf>following -masu stem</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1385940">折れ目</xref>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>

I've thought this over and considered both a new entry and a sense within this entry, but frankly I think the evidence is too thin to do either. Best to close it for now.

gg5, prog

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>guffaw</gloss>
+<gloss>guffawing</gloss>
+<gloss>roaring (with laughter)</gloss>
+<gloss>(laughing) heartily</gloss>

uncontroversial edit sitting for 2-3 days... self-approving

daijr, daijs for adv-to

ゲラゲラ gets more hits

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲラゲラ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

http://gogen-allguide.com/si/shirawokiru.html

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

GG5 only has しらを切る. Daijirin has 白を切る but notes "「しら」は「知らぬ」の「しら」".

So the 白 is there for its sound alone. We could call it an ateji....

G n-grams:
 シラを切る	4668
 しらを切る	3194
 白を切る 	2425
 シラをきる	2351
 しらをきる	1037

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>シラを切る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,4 @@
+<reb>シラをきる</reb>
+<re_restr>シラを切る</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>しらを切る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>白を切る</re_restr>

okay.  entry for どうと created

Sounds reasonable to me - there aren't that many hits for this (2,230 estimated with yahoo.co.jp)

v1, not v5r.  how about i just add an entry for どうと and we delete this?

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2055700">どっぷり</xref>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

スーパー大辞林

Looks fine to me.

@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>sleeping outdoors</gloss>
+<gloss>sleeping out in the open air</gloss>

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那・2</xref>

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那</xref>
@@ -22,1 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那</xref>

koj, daijr, daijs

qualifying sense 1 to justify not having to merge this with おっと, and removing 
sense 3...  daijisen says sense 3 refers to a different sense of 良民 than the one 
provided (w.r.t. the ritsuryosei)

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<s_inf>phrase used by wives to their husbands as a form of address</s_inf>
@@ -29,5 +30,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1644910">良民</xref>
-<gloss>good citizen</gloss>
-</sense>

koj

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>りょうにん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1434160">亭主・1</xref>
@@ -15,1 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1434160">亭主・1</xref>
@@ -17,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那・1</xref>
@@ -18,1 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那・1</xref>

daijisen daijirin koj

@@ -12,0 +12,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1496480">夫・おっと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1496480">夫・おっと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1434160">亭主</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1095890">ハズバンド</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1418410">旦那</xref>
@@ -14,0 +19,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>good person</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1644910">良民</xref>
+<gloss>good citizen</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>薄気味わるい</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>空とぼける</keb>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>to play dumb</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>底気味わるい</keb>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

G n-grams:
鎌を掛ける	125
鎌をかける	494
カマを掛ける	108
かまをかける	1138
カマをかける	1259

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>鎌を掛ける</keb>
+<keb>鎌をかける</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>鎌をかける</keb>
+<keb>鎌を掛ける</keb>
@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>鎌をかける</re_restr>
+<re_restr>鎌を掛ける</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カマをかける</reb>
+<re_restr>カマを掛ける</re_restr>
@@ -18,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Seen in a game

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カマを掛ける</keb>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

pretty basic construction with 89 google hits.  delete?

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

headword was okay, but i don't think we need this either. すべてにおいて勝る gets 110 hits

Not that common an expression and self explanatory.  I'm not sure it's useful for much. (The headword was wrong as well).

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>全てに於て勝る</keb>
+<keb>全てに於いて勝る</keb>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Happy to delete.

i think the translation for this entry is okay (imagine both precede a comma at 
the beginning of a sentence), but i'm not opposed to deleting it either

Quite right, Scott.  Not _this_ exp though. Unless you know something about 深く that I don't.

Anyway, I'm going to recommend a delete on this one.

It's completely normal that expressions be also marked as verbs. It simply indicates that they conjugate as verbs because they have one at the end. The "exp" tag makes it clear that they're not verbs in and out of themselves.

And awkward and not exceedingly common 'phrase'.  Could just delete it.

@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>to be deep in the bowels of the earth</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>deep in the bowels of the earth</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>be flummoxed</gloss>
+<gloss>to lose one's composure</gloss>
+<gloss>to lose one's head</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 度を失っ　　 │ 1,184 │ 97.3% │
│ 度をうしなっ │    33 │  2.7% │ - sK
│ どをうしなっ │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

新和英中辞典

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>to get flustered</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>度をうしなう</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>be flummoxed</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs, meikyo

sense 1 is apparently vi, even though it sometimes take を.  so i guess it's vi in the same way as ~を歩く

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +18,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come loose</gloss>
+<gloss>to come undone</gloss>
+<gloss>to get untied</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +21,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

koj, daijr, daijs

keep

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to break the tape (at the finishing line)</gloss>

gg5
daijr: "社会の風潮・傾向におくれる。好機を逸する。"
koj: "時流に遅れること、好機を逸することなどにいう。"

Apparently "miss the bus" has an idiomatic meaning in English as well but I've never used or heard it. I think it's better as a lit. gloss anyway.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to miss the bus</gloss>
+<gloss>to fall behind the times</gloss>
+<gloss>to miss out (on an opportunity)</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>to miss out (on an opportunity)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to miss the bus</gloss>

daij nikk

This is an idiom.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to miss out (on an opportunity)</gloss>

I don't think it is.

is this needed?
I understand that it's useful-ish for beginners, but I reckon 乗り遅れる is plenty discoverable already, and the only thing this entry adds is the に particle -- which is well covered under the examples of 乗り遅れる

gg5
wisdom: 水に手をひたすと, 冷たくてじいんとしてきた｟無感覚になった｠  When I dipped my hand in the water, I felt it going numb from cold.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1984410">じいんと・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1984410">ジーンと・1</xref>
@@ -15,2 +15,12 @@
-<gloss>to be moved to the point of tears</gloss>
-<gloss>to be touched</gloss>
+<gloss>to be deeply moved</gloss>
+<gloss>to touch one's heart</gloss>
+<gloss>to be deeply moving</gloss>
+<gloss>to be touching</gloss>
+<gloss>to come home to one</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&vk;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1984410">ジーンと・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to go numb</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1984410">じいんと・2</xref>

n-grams (3:1)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すぃません</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

すぃません	14671
スィマセン	3382

I'd prefer it if すぃません and スィマセン were kept, but I guess a person looking them up would realise. I've added them to the text-glossing specials.

https://girlschannel.net/topics/617793/
すんません is listed as ibaraki, saitama, 
kumamoto, hokkaido, toyama, kagawa, fukuoka in 
this (unnamed) 方言辞典.

I agree on -ぃ-

@@ -16,6 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すぃません</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スィマセン</reb>
-</r_ele>

https://99bako.com/361.html
"「すみません」は関西の方言では「すんません」「すんまへん」と言います"

Presumably すいません is less formal but I agree that it's not really colloquial.
Apparently すんません is 関西弁 so I suggest merging it with the すんまへん entry.
Can we drop すぃません and スィマセン? I know the n-gram counts are quite high but so many words can be written with small kana. People do it to sound cute. It's not standard orthography and I think it looks out of place among the regular forms.

@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1295060">済みません・1</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1295060">すみません・1</xref>

daijr

In spoken Japanese, I have a feeling "suimasen" isn't col. Should this really be tagged as such?

deleting for merge

google seems to confirm this reading but perhaps it should be merged.

Entry created

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2029185">ごろりと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2029185">ごろりと・1</xref>

Given the current gloss for ごろりと, it's not completely obvious.

新和英中辞典

It's in at least one 和英辞書 and has 6,600 Yahoo hits (estimate, 1000+ actual). I think we might as well keep it.

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2029185">ごろりと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179510">横になる</xref>

Damn, now I've woken up I have no idea what I was going to say. :-(

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201960">灰汁・3</xref>
-<gloss>to skim the scum from broth or liquid</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1201960">あく・3</xref>
+<gloss>to remove the scum (from a broth or liquid)</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

Looks OK to me.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>灰汁を取る</keb>
@@ -13,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1201960">灰汁・3</xref>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Entry created