Sense switch is appropriate, I think. All good points about 来る/来たる.

It is interesting however notice when you check common usages as adj 来たる has more hits:

It seems the notation 来たるべき is quite established 
"来たるべき" -> 4,980,000
"来るべき" -> 2,290,000

In other cases 来る surpasses 来たる by an average 40%
"来る者" -> 974,000
"来たる者"　-> 617,000

"来る春" -> 74,800
"来たる春"-> 43,700

Except for dates, where 来る clearly wins over 来たる being from 5 to 10 times more used.
"来る4月" -> 1,250,000
"来たる4月"　-> 233,000

"来る25日" -> 156,000
"来たる25日"　-> 15,500 

I suppose the reason is quite intuitive: when you have dates it is very easy to understand 来る is meant to be read きたる. It is a shorter notation, very practical. However in other cases even Japanese people get confused. When they see 来る者 for instance, they will need to think how to read it, while 来たる here avoids ambiguity. That is the same reason 来たるべき　with the time became such an established notation. It is not only us to have problems reading kanji, Japanese people go though the same hardships.

sorry.  got that comment backwards.  some dics suggest when a verb 来たる; when an adj-pn 来る

daijr 3rd ed has 来たる as well now, but only in its entry for the verb.  daijr's entry for adj-pn is strictly 来る.
=====
meikyo:
きた・る【来たる】
[自四]〔古〕くる。やってくる。
「○○先生、━」
「待ち人━・らず」
*「来至る」の転という。文語動詞であるため、常用漢字表の例欄には語例を掲げないが、送りがなは「来くる」に準じて「来たる」と送る（ただし、許容では「来る」とできよう）。
-
きたる【来る】
[連体]《日付などの上に付いて》もうすぐくる。この次にくる。
「━五日は創立記念日だ」
*動詞「来たる」の連体形から出た語だが、慣用に従って「来る」と送る。動詞の場合とは送りがなが異なる。

-some dictionaries (e.g., daijr, meikyo) suggest that when a verb it should be written as 来る, whereas when adj-pn it should be written as 来たる.
-i don't think an ichi tag is out of line for this entry. sense 1 is old-fashioned but sense 2 is not uncommon.  i suspect that the ichi tag legitimately belongs on 来る, though i have no evidence.

@@ -14,7 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to come</gloss>
-<gloss>to arrive</gloss>
-<gloss>to be due to</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -26,0 +20,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>to come</gloss>
+<gloss>to arrive</gloss>
+<gloss>to be due to</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 中辞典, etc. (both have 来たる as headword)

(a) Yes, the "Ichiman" wordlist does have 来る/きたる on it.
(b) I see two modern refs are now using 来たる, so the "io" should come off it.
(c) It might be prudent to put the "ichi1" tag on 来たる instead, in which case it should go first?
(d) I have no idea which of 来たる/きたる and 来る/きたる is more common. It's difficult to test.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -10 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +11,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>rice flour</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1841190">白玉・しらたま・2</xref>
+<gloss>refined rice flour</gloss>
+<gloss>rice flour for dumplings</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Pauline epistles (i.e. the epistles of Paul)</gloss>
+<gloss>the epistles of Paul</gloss>
+<gloss>Pauline epistles</gloss>

See below.

Whilst it seems obvious to the scholars, it may be a little odd for someone who checks a reading and disovers that a well known woman's first name appears from a reading of "パウロ".

I am wondering whether the amendment may be helpful to some.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Pauline epistles</gloss>
+<gloss>Pauline epistles (i.e. the epistles of Paul)</gloss>

Entry created

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (has both forms)
見づらい	303323
見辛い	39890
見えづらい	39805
見え辛い	5063
みづらい	9408
みえづらい	601

Needs to be split (although KOD merges)

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>見えづらい</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>indistinct</gloss>
+<gloss>obscure</gloss>
+<gloss>illegible</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見えづらい</keb>

koj, daij, wi1

koj, daijr, daijs

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<s_inf>from Matthew 7:26</s_inf>

eij

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

koj, daij, wi1

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

koj, daij, gg5

koj, daijr, daijs

koj, daij, wi1

着付ける	7568
着つける	746

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to be used to wearing</gloss>
+<gloss>to get used to wearing</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>着つける</keb>

daij

daij

koj, daij, gg5

daij, gg5, wi1

koj,daijs

koj, daijr, daijs

koj, daij, gg5

daijirin, meikyo, iwakoku

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

koj, daij, gg5

koj, daijr, daijs

koj, daij, gg5, eij

koj, daijr, daijs

No home should be without one.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/chamfron

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>silver-plated champron</gloss>
+<gloss>silver-plated chamfron</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

wiki

I don't think that qualifier is necessary.

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1317410">自衛隊</xref>
-<gloss>ceremonial sword (used by the JSDF and old Japanese army)</gloss>
+<gloss>ceremonial sword</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/軍刀

wiki honyaku

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>practice sword used in Iaido</gloss>
+<gloss>practice sword used in iaido</gloss>

nikk

wiki

Done.

Name

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1420880">地下茎</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1420880">地下茎</xref>
+<field>&bot;</field>

gg5 koj

GG5

As in 脱真実/post-truth.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>post-</gloss>

daijs, prog, gg5

linguee

See: http://www.linguee.jp/日本語-
%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/search?
source=auto&query=%22%E9%AB%98%E6%AD%A2%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8A%22

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>remaining high</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

koj, daijr, daijs

koj, daij, gg5

n-grams
既にして	653
すでにして	740

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

koj, daij, meikyo

gg5, nikk

I agree tha the iK is probably inappropriate.

@@ -9,1 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>a sword of the Dōtanuki school, usually thicker and heavier than regular Japanese swords</gloss>
+<gloss>sword of the Dotanuki school, usually thicker and heavier than regular Japanese swords</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/同田貫

Not sure if 胴田貫 deserves the [iK] tag.  If I’m 
understanding sources correctly 同田貫 is used both in fact 
and fiction, while 胴田貫 is a folk-etymology exclusive to 
fiction.  This is a common trope in jidaigeki as well as 
modern pop culture.

Francis - please put in a part-of-speech.

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2510690">パウロ書簡</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2510690">パウロ書簡</xref>

See below.

Query delete/add as an alternative to entry:-

パウロ書簡 【パウロしょかん】 (n) Pauline epistles

i could go either way.  from the japanese/buddhist angle, we tend to let all sutra 
names into edict itself.

Should this and パウロ書簡 be in Enamdict? (パウロ書簡 gets respectable hits and has a Wiki page.)

@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>The Letters of Paul</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the letters of Paul</gloss>

See below.

Query delete/add as an alternative to:-

パウロ書簡 【パウロしょかん】 (n) Pauline epistles

Also, if the main entry, as above, is expaned as indicated in my earlier submissions, the following could be deleted:-

パウロの手紙 【パウロのてがみ】 (?) ???; RH

We've been keeping 版 & 盤 apart as they are usually different things. 廉価版/廉価盤 is the only combined one that I can see.

Looks like we split 通常版 and 通常盤 earlier this year.

A merger for these terms sounds a little awkward to me. They're different words that coincidentally share the same reading, aren't they?

Merge w 廃番? (and 廃盤? I think we have other 版 & 盤 together with a usage note)

koj, reverso examples

-> noun gloss

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1472180">廃盤</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1472180">廃盤</xref>
-<gloss>out of print</gloss>
+<gloss>discontinued edition (model, product, etc.)</gloss>

Eijiro

Seems OK. Not very common.

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Add reading

Daijirin too.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to give something weight or dignity</gloss>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to give something weight</gloss>
+<gloss>to give something dignity</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/箔を付け%E
3%82%8B

daij, meikyo

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>makeup</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>dressing beautifully</gloss>
+<gloss>beautiful makeup</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びしょう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>make up</gloss>
+<gloss>makeup</gloss>

This appeared in the credits of a TV show but I don't know if 
it means film / TV make up.

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/128318/m1u/蒼空/

progressive waei

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>其の先</keb>

See below.

I wonder if we can have an entry for this. There are millions of them on a Google search. The novice may be left to wonder if the "先" is "せん" or "さき". However, most references seem to go for "せん".

My apologies if I have missed this on the site, but I have tried in several ways to find it. I just felt that with such a large usage, I must have missed something. I know it comes up as part of some wider meanings, but those entries do not not seem to be in the main dictionary.

I think "perhaps not much, but some" is an awkward-sounding gloss.
"in any way" was for contexts like "If I could help in any way ..." but I'm fine with dropping it. It's potentially misleading.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>at least a bit</gloss>
+<gloss>(even) if only a little</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>even if only a little</gloss>
-<gloss>perhaps not much, but some</gloss>
+<gloss>in the slightest way</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/多少なりとも
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/14778079 彼はここで生まれ育ったので、多少なりとも道は知ってるはずだ。＝少しは知ってるはずだ。
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190504163722.html
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=多少なりとも

「目の前にいるのは、男装の麗人。男とみまがうにはあまりに麗しすぎる。さらに、多少なりともある胸のふくらみ、触りがいありそうなヒップラインが、彼女が女であることを示している。」

"in any way" seems wrong or too context dependent?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>in any way</gloss>
+<gloss>at least a bit</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>perhaps not much, but some</gloss>