Encountered today in Nikkei.

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>システマティク</reb>
+</r_ele>

I suspect it's a false positive anyway.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf07</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf07</re_pri>

黄の花	1742
黄な花	65


黄色の花	80728

黄色い花	177075

Not tagged as adj-na in daijs (but in daijr). 

I think removing the frequency tags would be good, this isn't actually particularly common as a free-standing word. It's unfortunate if this should show higher up than 黄色 or 黄色い when searching for "yellow" in a jmdict-based app. (it doesn't on jisho, but it might on others)

more commonly as xref

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1576760">黄色</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1576760">黄色</xref>

daijr

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

@@ -77,0 +78 @@
+<gloss>to harvest (a crop)</gloss>

Sorry, that gloss was meant to go on sense 3.
I've indexed some sentences for most of the senses (there were 5 or 6 I couldn't find any sentences for).

@@ -39,0 +40 @@
+<gloss>to take (e.g. a vacation)</gloss>

Probably not.

@@ -46 +45,0 @@
-<gloss>to take</gloss>

sense 4 has a double "to take" - is this intentional?

Thanks for tackling this. It badly needed revision & expansion.
There are about 800 sentences using 取る. Classifying the lot would be a horrible pain. If you can identify a couple per sense it would be good.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

More glosses.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>to come off</gloss>
-<gloss>to be removed</gloss>
+<gloss>to come off (of a button, handle, lid, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -21 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>to disappear (of pain, a fever, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go away (of a fever, pain, swelling, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to disappear</gloss>
+<gloss>to come out (of a stain)</gloss>
+<gloss>to come off (e.g. of dust)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be removed (e.g. of wrinkles)</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +28,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2228260">獲れる・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2228250">捕れる・1</xref>
-<gloss>to be caught</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +30,5 @@
+<gloss>to be picked</gloss>
+<gloss>to be produced</gloss>
+<gloss>to be caught (of fish)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be obtained</gloss>
+<gloss>to be extracted</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +41,2 @@
+<gloss>to be understood (as)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be read (as)</gloss>
@@ -40 +47,2 @@
-<gloss>to be attained (of balance, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be attained (of balance, harmony, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be achieved</gloss>
@@ -48 +56,5 @@
-<gloss>to be obtainable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to get</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to obtain</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to secure</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to win</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to catch</gloss>

This is fine. At one point we had vi,vt on all the senses, which was incorrect.

Didn't see the edit history until after I had submitted. Maybe
the transitivity tags aren't needed. If they are, there are
several other とれる entries that could use [vi] tags as well.

meikyo, oukoku, kojien, iwanami

sense #6 is marked 〘自他下一〙 in meikyo since it's a form of 取る.
Not sure if that fits with our style.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +39 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +44,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5 has promoter.

The current gloss, "leader", only captures a sliver of themeaning of the term 推進者 and, if left to stand on its own, will can easily be misinterpreted to mean "leader" in the sense of "head"/"person in charge", which is definitely not part of the meaning (a 推進者 need not have any official role, if any, in a given organisation).
Support from another source (GG5?) wouild hbe appreciated...

@@ -12,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>promoter</gloss>
+<gloss>instigator</gloss>
+<gloss>driving force</gloss>
+<gloss>pioneer</gloss>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>Ryougoku (area of Tokyo)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ryōgoku (area of Tokyo)</gloss>

I don't think the 両国の is adjectival, just possessive

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

新和英中辞典 supports this split, but even splits sense 2 further. I like the way Adonic has done it.

@@ -28,0 +28,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1899590">名を連ねる・なをつらねる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2558580">袂を連ねる・たもとをつらねる</xref>
@@ -36,0 +38,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1701870">書き連ねる・かきつらねる</xref>
@@ -38,0 +41,1 @@
+<gloss>to string together (e.g. compliments)</gloss>
@@ -39,1 +43,0 @@
-<gloss>to say one after another</gloss>

daijr daijs
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=つらねる&dtype=3&dname=2na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=02854200

@@ -22,0 +22,14 @@
+<gloss>to line up</gloss>
+<gloss>to put in a row</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to add (to a group)</gloss>
+<gloss>to accept (as a member of an organization, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to join (e.g. a list)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2056000">美辞麗句を連ねる・びじれいくをつらねる</xref>
@@ -23,1 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>to join</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +38,8 @@
+<gloss>to enumerate</gloss>
+<gloss>to say one after another</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take along with</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring with</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/148502/m1u/列ねる/

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>列ねる</keb>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Quite common typo - 94k Googits.

@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>減菌</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

koj

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>えばはおり</reb>
+</r_ele>

koj, daij, gg5, etc.

54 hits for 絵羽羽織り inc. edict, "絵羽々織り" looks like pure edict

@@ -5,4 +5,1 @@
-<keb>絵羽羽織り</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>絵羽々織り</keb>
+<keb>絵羽羽織</keb>

Honyaku

Common term.

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>fishway</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1326980">取る・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1326980">取る・7</xref>

G n-grams:
 朝食をとって	26090	
 朝食を取って	11244	
 朝食を摂って	 7793  

Tatoeba has 85 examples tagged 摂る:
  とる  78
  摂る  6	
  取る  1

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to have (e.g lunch)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have (e.g. lunch)</gloss>

Oops

was that intended as a keep or a deletion?

kanwa entry

Entry created

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>eccentric</gloss>
+<gloss>novel</gloss>

nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/奇-471962

sense 1 could be refined

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1870990">奇を衒う</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1219410">奇数</xref>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>odd</gloss>
+<gloss>odd number</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. at sentence end</s_inf>
-<gloss>although (with nuance of strong discontent)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. at sentence end; with nuance of strong discontent</s_inf>
+<gloss>although</gloss>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>I wish ....</gloss>
+<gloss>I wish that</gloss>

AFAIC, I think so.  I didn't notice there had been a new comment on it.

Happy new year.

OK to close this one now?

I agree, re: "it is not idiomatic" - that is exactly the reason why i raised this 
issue. :-) I have the feeling you may have missed my point: it is not my aim to 
account for all possible parsings but (since no algorithm can, quite 
understandably, parse as competently as knowledgeable humans do) to 
mitigate the fact that the database habitually offers up this idiomatic 
expression (the only sense currently listed) which in most cases is simply 
wrong. If all this can be expressed without going into the details i previously 
suggested, then i'd be very happy - as it stands, what comes up seems to me 
worse than no result at all.
IOW, what i think needs to be said (in some way) is, "in most cases this has no 
meaning beyond its standard grammatical function, but in some cases, 
especially if at the end of a sentence, it can mean the following: ..." - even 
just a CODE pointing to such an explanation would be useful (there are more 
expressions in the database that i'd like to see looked after in the same 
manner)
Ah, and by the way, "Happy New Year!"...

I don't think it's possible or desirable to cater to every possible parsing of the 
dictionary's entries.
もの+を in the senses listed above is not idiomatic, and it's better parsed by 
our two existing entries for もの and を rather than trying to force them 
together unnaturally into this entry

4k hits without the の.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>ワードの境界</keb>
+<keb>ワード境界</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>ワードのきょうかい</reb>
+<reb>ワードきょうかい</reb>

69 hits inc edict

corrected misspelling in meaning:  boundry -> boundary

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>word boundry</gloss>
+<gloss>word boundary</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2601210">前方一致</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2601200">部分一致</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>right-hand match</gloss>
+<gloss>ends-with match</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>matching a sub-string with the end of a field</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Pauline epistles (i.e. the epistles of Paul)</gloss>
+<gloss>the epistles of Paul</gloss>
+<gloss>Pauline epistles</gloss>

See below.

Whilst it seems obvious to the scholars, it may be a little odd for someone who checks a reading and disovers that a well known woman's first name appears from a reading of "パウロ".

I am wondering whether the amendment may be helpful to some.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Pauline epistles</gloss>
+<gloss>Pauline epistles (i.e. the epistles of Paul)</gloss>

Entry created

koj, daijr, daijs, nikk

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1782270">絵羽羽織り・えばばおり</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1782270">絵羽羽織・えばばおり</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1782270">絵羽羽織・えばばおり</xref>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2601400">絵羽模様</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1782270">絵羽羽織</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1782270">絵羽羽織</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>figured haori (coat)</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5

hits

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

http://www.soc.hit-u.ac.jp/~decontext/about.html
http://gskim.blog102.fc2.com/blog-entry-18.html
http://www.ia.inf.shizuoka.ac.jp/~isarida/personal/Proceedings/EPA02.PDF
and more...

Also in WI2

gets 280 real hits.  i'm not sure if it's needed, especially if 文脈化 is added.  the 
english word is not likely to be looked up ("recontextualization" is not in the 
english dictionary either)

http://wackie.tea-nifty.com/blog/cat93867/index.html
http://www.soc.hit-u.ac.jp/research/thesis/doctor/?
choice=exam&thesisID=220
http://ree-takeuchi.com/modules/wordpress/attach/MAXQDA_ver1.0.pdf
http://www.fasid.or.jp/sig_blog/archives/SIG-MODe_100203.pdf
and more...

Sufficiently acculturated people will, of course, not need this entry, since for 
them 再+文脈+化 is obvious, but for everybody else i think it is useful. :-)

eij/wi1, wiki

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コンテクスチュアリゼーション
http://www.eth.med.osaka-u.ac.jp/OJ6/tai.pdf
http://homepage3.nifty.com/rac/05ar/04/0401.html
and many more

In case someone thinks it worthwhile to point out that 文脈化 is nothing more 
than the obvious combination of 文脈 with 化 and thus does not warrant an 
entry, let me say this:
1) I agree (if you see it strictly from a J-E perspective) 
2) I don't think that something being obvious means it should not be in a 
dictionary - in fact, if it wasn't for the vast amount of - to the experienced 
user - obvious items in this and other databases (especially EIJIRO comes to 
mind), many of us would still be stuck at the textbook level of language 
learning - "obviousness" means, after all, "pattern reinforcement" and 
"psychological reassurance", both of which are vitally important for successful 
language education (even if this perhaps not obvious to the more technically 
minded and already fluent linguist);
3) (bonus point) I suspect i am not the only user of JEDIC who regularly uses it 
as EJDIC. :-) Why? Because there is at present no comparable EJDIC out there, 
but some of us (for whatever reason - for example, because we live in Japan) 
not only have to understand Japanese text but also produce Japanese text, 
and i, for one, am most grateful that JEDIC has turned out to be one of the 
tools that i can use for that purpose. In this context (no pun intended) it is 
_also_ useful to have such "obvious" expressions in the database... :-)

OK, moved to enamdict.

I came across this term first in the context of a text where the projection room
of a (now defunct) local theater is called 音塾ホール - so perhaps we are seeing
the same process at work here that turned originally TM'd expressions like
"Aspirin", "Kleenex", and "Xerox" into common expressions - ENAMDIC would seem
a safe place for this item. :-)

this looks like a trademarked(?) name.  all the references above (except for 
http://www.otojuku.jp/) seem to refer to the same Yamagata-based 
company.  the odd man out is a company called Otojuku Gakudai, which 
suggests that they're using Otojuku as the actual ~name~ of the school (e.g., 
a proper noun).
--
i don't know.  it would be like if a handful of music-related american 
education companies were called "Musiconservatory" or something.  my 
feeling is that if it's not a real word, it shouldn't go into EDICT.  to ENAMDICT 
as an [org]?

* text at hand
* on the web
http://yamagata-np.jp/news/201001/24/kj_2010012400392.php
http://hello.ap.teacup.com/otojyuku/
http://www.otojuku.jp/
http://otojuku.net/home.html
and many other sites...

This is one of those funny beasts that seem to have no denotative meaning (and 
thus elude dictionaries and Wikipedia alike)!

But since it is used widely enough because of its connotative meanings, i think it 
should be in the database - what is the best way to deal with such items?

nikk

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, リーダーズ+プラス

Eijiro

Quite common

obviously okay, but not in daijirin, afaict

Daijirin, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

WWW pages galore.

Google for "商工団体連合会" + "商連". May be from other compounds too.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1420880">地下茎</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1420880">地下茎</xref>
+<field>&bot;</field>

gg5 koj

gg5

WWW pages (900k hits), newspaper article.

Useful portmanteau word.

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/大学院
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1011251065

600k Googits

daijs

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro

WWW pages (500k+ Googits)

works well enough for me

I found it in a Nikkei passage: 子連れスキー場が増えているのは、小さな子供を連れ歩くのに抵抗がなくなってきたため...  which certainly supports that リーダーズ+プラス meaning.
See how this goes...

@@ -12,1 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>to carry around</gloss>
+<gloss>to walk with</gloss>
+<gloss>to make someone tag along</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<gloss>to carry around (esp. a child)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス has: 	carry around＝CARRY…about; 〈子供を〉連れ歩く; .....

I guess the carry is specifically for a child. Third sense?

if i'm not mistaken, nikkoku has this as
-
[1][v5k,vi]
to walk with
[1][v5k,vt]
to make someone tag along
-
etc.  poor wording on the part of eijiro, or does it fit into one of these senses, 
or is it a legitimate third sense?

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro

In Nikkei.

GG5

As in 脱真実/post-truth.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>post-</gloss>

daijs, prog, gg5

linguee

See: http://www.linguee.jp/日本語-
%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/search?
source=auto&query=%22%E9%AB%98%E6%AD%A2%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8A%22

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>remaining high</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

koj, daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飲付ける</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Koj, Daijirin

fork

?  surely the communication is not achieved by the act of drinking.  was not the original gloss better?

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>communicating while drinking</gloss>
+<gloss>communicating through drinking together</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<s_inf>from のみ and コミュニケーション</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 飲み and コミュニケーション</s_inf>

i'd say it's generally not worth submitting an 'amendment' to add such things, esp. if the term is already sourced

Done.

Merge w 飲みニケーション

N-grams, Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Ref has "(going) drinking with colleagues to exchange information and deepen social links", which I think is closer to the original. Fleshing it out won't hurt.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノミニケーション</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>communicating while drinking (usu. with colleagues)</gloss>
@@ -10,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>boozing with work people</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>communicating while drinking</gloss>
+<gloss>communicating through drinking together</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

* daijs: …親交を深めること (https://kotobank.jp/word/飲みニケーション-597408)
* daijr: …親睦や交流を深めること

I think the current glosses focus too much on the "communication" origin of the term. Applying Marcus' suggestion.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -29,3 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>communicating while drinking (usu. with colleagues)</gloss>
-<gloss>communicating through drinking together</gloss>
-<gloss>boozing with work people</gloss>
+<gloss>drinking with colleagues to deepen ties</gloss>
+<gloss>bonding over alcohol</gloss>

60% in Japan see drinking with colleagues to 
deepen ties as "unnecessary"
(kyodo)
(the orig. jp is about 飲みニケーション)

"drinking with colleagues to deepen ties" 
could work as a gloss too.

飲みニケーション	7115
飲みニュケーション	1745
ノミニケーション	3364
ノミュニケーション	1132

Merge.

@@ -17,0 +18,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノミニケーション</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノミュニケーション</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -20,2 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2601390">ノミュニケーション</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2601390">ノミュニケーション</xref>

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2601390">ノミュニケーション</xref>

koj, daij, gg5

n-grams
既にして	653
すでにして	740

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

koj, daij, meikyo

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro

nikk

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>First train (abbr.) see 始発電車</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2601460">始発電車</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>first train</gloss>

大江健三郎の『偽証の時』で出てくる語彙。

「自由に通りぬけることのできる通用門が終夜開いているし、始電の走る音は少し前
に硝子窓を震わせたのだ。」、『偽証の時』pp. 76

"He had probably lead himself freely to the nocturnal open gate and few 
moments earlier the sound of the first train running had shaken the glass 
windows."

I have been trying to find this word (始電) in many dictionaries around the 
Internet. Finally I was able to find out the meaning and explanation in the 
Japanese Wikipedia under the term 始発便. Here there is the entry 
explanation:  

始発便（しはつびん）とは鉄道、バス、船舶、航空などの公共交通機関において、あ
る路線・航路・航空路で一日のうち最初に運行する便である。鉄道の場合始発列車
（電車なら始発電車（始電））、バスの場合は始発バス（始バス）と呼ばれる。

It might not be a very common word. However I reckon the more words any 
dictionay has, the better.

gg5, nikk

I agree tha the iK is probably inappropriate.

@@ -9,1 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>a sword of the Dōtanuki school, usually thicker and heavier than regular Japanese swords</gloss>
+<gloss>sword of the Dotanuki school, usually thicker and heavier than regular Japanese swords</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/同田貫

Not sure if 胴田貫 deserves the [iK] tag.  If I’m 
understanding sources correctly 同田貫 is used both in fact 
and fiction, while 胴田貫 is a folk-etymology exclusive to 
fiction.  This is a common trope in jidaigeki as well as 
modern pop culture.

Francis - please put in a part-of-speech.

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2510690">パウロ書簡</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2510690">パウロ書簡</xref>

See below.

Query delete/add as an alternative to entry:-

パウロ書簡 【パウロしょかん】 (n) Pauline epistles

i could go either way.  from the japanese/buddhist angle, we tend to let all sutra 
names into edict itself.

Should this and パウロ書簡 be in Enamdict? (パウロ書簡 gets respectable hits and has a Wiki page.)

@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>The Letters of Paul</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the letters of Paul</gloss>

See below.

Query delete/add as an alternative to:-

パウロ書簡 【パウロしょかん】 (n) Pauline epistles

Also, if the main entry, as above, is expaned as indicated in my earlier submissions, the following could be deleted:-

パウロの手紙 【パウロのてがみ】 (?) ???; RH

Agree. I have added those 2 as entries.

源説 is an incorrect parsing for all of those examples.  e.g., 
誤った語源説  =  誤った  語源+説
民間語源説  = 民間  語源+説
単一起源説  = 単一起源+説
so i don't think this entry can be justified
==
entries for 起源説 [theory of origins] or 語源説 [etymological theory] might be 
worthwhile if it's felt that the constructions aren't sufficiently obvious

See below.

I am wondering if it would help to have this combination as a main entry. It appears following other kanji in great numbers. Meanings are ascribed to the wider combinations, but no so for this submission, yet the basic concept seems clear enough.

On the site you have the following:-

誤った語源説 【？】 false etymology; WI4
民間語源説 【？】 folk etymology; popular etymology; WI4
単一起源説 【？】 monogenesis; WI4
アフリカ起源説 【？】 Out of Africa hypothesis (theory); WI4
起源説 【きげんせつ】 (?) ???; RH
語源説 【ごげんせつ】 (?) ???; RH

Some of these pick up over 250k references in a Google search.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>character who looks, acts, etc. like a cat</gloss>