http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokkeibon

gg5

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>comic books</gloss>
+<gloss>comic novel (Edo period)</gloss>

Rejecting this branch so I can approve the other.

Keeping it as a note without the headword would work for me.  I don't think they should be merged.

My inclination is to drop 笑談 from the entry apart from an "also written". It was added in Sep. 2008 by Scott with the comment about 夏目漱石. I can see comments in WWW pages about it being read じょうだん.
If it's not dropped, perhaps the entries should be merged?

@@ -31,0 +31,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2589580">笑談・しょうだん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2589580">笑談・しょうだん・2</xref>

nikk

笑談 is listed as しょうだん in both daij and koj so this might be a mistake.

@@ -12,0 +12,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>戯談</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>串戯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

I think the point of putting in a comment is so that they don't get to be a headword. Even with an iK it creates something messy, e.g. for text glossing.

Not that I want to stretch the debate here, but I prefer having Kanji headwords in the proper field and using the iK tag. I'm not a big fan of extra headwords hidden in notes and I think that the iK tag is there for situations like these.

The Soseki reference is nothing special and I see that it's used by others as well. (see http://www.google.co.jp/search?hl=ja&source=hp&q=笑談+じょうだん+site:www.aozora.gr.jp)

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笑談</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -26,1 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>

@@ -25,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2589580">笑談・しょうだん・2</xref>
+<s_inf>sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>

yeah, i'm not buying it.  笑談 should have its own entry.  and nikkoku lists its 
earliest usage as the 15th century, so it's not a soseki-ism

those aren't ateji, btw.

@@ -11,4 +11,0 @@
-<keb>笑談</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,1 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,1 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -31,1 +25,0 @@
-<s_inf>笑談 is an ateji created by 夏目漱石</s_inf>

i think the idea is that most of the time we ==don't want it to show up== 
because the signal-to-noise ratio is so crumby

if it were up to me, i'd toss most of the iK entries anyway.  iK should be used 
for common misrepresentations, not one-off henkan errors or "a handful of 
guys wrote it like this a few hundred years ago but so infrequently that writers 
of real Japanese dictionaries have never even thought of including it".  If 
writers consistently had to give yomigana so their readers could understand 
that they were using the reading じょうだん instead of しょうだん, that's a 
good sign that 笑談[じょうだん] was never in wide enough circulation to be 
relevant.

Replying to: "I think the point of putting in a comment is so that they don't get to be a headword. Even with an iK it creates something messy, e.g. for text glossing."

Would the mess come from the fact that there would be two entries with 笑談 as an headword ? 

I don't care about this that much, but it would make sense to me to include it as an headword since it's used to write じょうだん by a couple of different writers. 

The problem with the note is that if something is just written in a note, it won't show up when doing a search on wwwjdic. Of course, I doubt that many people will be searching for 笑談 on wwjdic, but you never know.

@@ -15,0 +15,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笑談</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

nikk

Merging in Scott's suggested entry.

@@ -22,0 +22,10 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぎだん</reb>
+<re_restr>戯談</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>げだん</reb>
+<re_restr>戯談</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -26,1 +36,1 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>
+<s_inf>じょうだん is sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>
@@ -29,0 +39,1 @@
+<gloss>funny story</gloss>

@@ -25,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2589580">笑談・しょうだん・2</xref>
+<s_inf>sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>

冗談を言って	28720
笑談を言って	No matches

I think we should drop the 笑談 note. It's only in meikyo as "もと「笑談」とも".

@@ -37,2 +37 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2589580">笑談・しょうだん・2</xref>
-<s_inf>じょうだん is sometimes written 笑談</s_inf>
+<gloss>joke</gloss>
@@ -40 +38,0 @@
-<gloss>joke</gloss>

冗談の	90771	  
冗談のよう	29469	  
冗談のつもり	24113	  
冗談のような	17330	  
冗談のつもりで	13173	  
冗談のように	8222	  
冗談のつもりだっ	5359	  
冗談のつもりだった	5317	  
冗談のつもりで書い	3131	  
冗談の通じ	3041	  
冗談のつもりで書いた	2961

I don't think this is an adjective

@@ -37 +36,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I can't see rejected entries (unless I ask for them.)

another variant. And I don't understand why I can see the 3 rejected entries.

@@ -15,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>串戲</keb>

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>novel from the late Edo period focused on the love stories of ordinary townsfolk</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>ninjōbon</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">novel from the late Edo period focused on the love stories of ordinary townsfolk</gloss>

townsfolk is already plural

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>novel from the late Edo period focused on the love stories of ordinary townsfolks</gloss>
+<gloss>novel from the late Edo period focused on the love stories of ordinary townsfolk</gloss>

koj

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>a novel</gloss>
+<gloss>novel from the late Edo period focused on the love stories of ordinary townsfolks</gloss>

I think it\s confusing if we don\t make it clear it\s an etym note by beginning with "from" or sth similar

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -52 +53 @@
-<s_inf>multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") resembles grass: wwwwww</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from how multiple repetitions of the letter "w" ("LOL") resemble grass</s_inf>

See 2859433.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クサ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -30,0 +35,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. クサ</s_inf>
+<gloss>marijuana</gloss>
+<gloss>cannabis</gloss>

Maybe this briefer version works.

@@ -41 +41 @@
-<s_inf>from the resemblance of multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") to grass: wwwwww</s_inf>
+<s_inf>multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") resembles grass: wwwwww</s_inf>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/草#Etymology_3_2

I think this sense is worth explaining.

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2714230">ｗ</xref>
@@ -40 +41 @@
-<gloss>laughter</gloss>
+<s_inf>from the resemblance of multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") to grass: wwwwww</s_inf>
@@ -41,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>haha</gloss>

Fork

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

See 2859433.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クサ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -30,0 +35,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. クサ</s_inf>
+<gloss>marijuana</gloss>
+<gloss>cannabis</gloss>

Maybe this briefer version works.

@@ -41 +41 @@
-<s_inf>from the resemblance of multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") to grass: wwwwww</s_inf>
+<s_inf>multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") resembles grass: wwwwww</s_inf>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/草#Etymology_3_2

I think this sense is worth explaining.

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2714230">ｗ</xref>
@@ -40 +41 @@
-<gloss>laughter</gloss>
+<s_inf>from the resemblance of multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") to grass: wwwwww</s_inf>
@@ -41,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>haha</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ の草を　 │ 53,206 │
│ のくさを │    204 │
│ のクサを │     58 │
├─ーーーー─┼────────┤
│ の草が　 │ 31,625 │
│ のくさが │     85 │
│ のクサが │     26 │
├─ーーーー─┼────────┤
│ の草は　 │ 16,628 │
│ のくさは │    448 │
│ のクサは │     64 │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

Seems pretty rare. I think it can go.

@@ -19,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>クサ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

Very good analysis, and the same ratios apply to current WWW hits. Clearly that sense is not mainly クサ, and in fact クサ could probably be either hidden or simply dropped.

@@ -39,2 +38,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>esp. クサ</s_inf>

Sankoku doesn't mention the katakana form in its entry for くさ【草】.
The n-grams below make me question whether it's actually common at all. We might be better off dropping the note. 

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ マリファナを吸っ │ 2,271 │
│ 　　　　草を吸っ │   613 │
│ 　　　クサを吸っ │    40 │
│ 　　大麻草を吸っ │    43 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ 　マリファナ使用 │ 2,034 │
│ 　　　　　草使用 │   824 │
│ 　　　　クサ使用 │     0 │
│ 　　　大麻草使用 │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ マリファナを吸う │ 1,317 │
│ 　　　　草を吸う │ 1,204 │
│ 　　　クサを吸う │     0 │
│ 　　大麻草を吸う │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ マリファナを吸い │ 1,284 │
│ 　　　　草を吸い │   197 │
│ 　　　クサを吸い │     0 │
│ 　　大麻草を吸い │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ 　マリファナ吸っ │ 1,093 │
│ 　　　　　草吸っ │   251 │
│ 　　　　クサ吸っ │    73 │
│ 　　　大麻草吸っ │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ マリファナの使用 │   567 │
│ 　　　　草の使用 │   198 │
│ 　　　クサの使用 │     0 │
│ 　　大麻草の使用 │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ 　マリファナ吸う │   345 │
│ 　　　　　草吸う │    86 │
│ 　　　　クサ吸う │     0 │
│ 　　　大麻草吸う │     0 │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ 　マリファナ吸い │   299 │
│ 　　　　　草吸い │    98 │
│ 　　　　クサ吸い │     0 │
│ 　　　大麻草吸い │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

The hiding of a form and just having a note is usually when it's usually a less common alternative way of writing that sense. Here a cannabis/marijuana sense would almost always be written クサ. If it's not visible, it should be in its own entry.
I'll close this to shorten the queue and reopen for a bit.

Yes, it's JIS213 (and Unicode).

曆 seems to be an illegal character screwing up text glossing.  for example, 
because of it, this is given as an example sentence for たいようれき:
     マリーゴールドは太陽とともに起きる。	The marigold rises with the 
sun.[Amend]

@@ -6,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>太陽曆</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

accidental auto-approve

there are many solar calendars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_calendar

i don't see any reason to single out the julian, especially since 太陽暦 usually refers to the gregorian

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Julian calendar</gloss>

OK

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/tv/kabuki/20200506/2035063/
"The World of Chushingura: The Treasury of Loyal Retainers (Part 1)"
book title: "Chushingura Or, Forty-seven Ronin" (1894)"
etc.

I don't think the kokugos are saying this means "performance of...", they're saying it's a common name for these plays, but that the 
word itself just refers to the story.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1356680">浄瑠璃</xref>
-<gloss>performance or narrative based on the story of the Forty-seven Rōnin (esp. the Kanadehon Chūshingura, an epic puppet play first performed in 1748)</gloss>
+<gloss>(story of the) Forty-seven Rōnin</gloss>
+<gloss>the Treasury of Loyal Retainers</gloss>
+<gloss>Chūshingura</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>performance or narrative based on the story of the Forty-seven Ronin (esp. the Kanadehon Chūshingura, an epic puppet play first performed in 1748)</gloss>
+<gloss>performance or narrative based on the story of the Forty-seven Rōnin (esp. the Kanadehon Chūshingura, an epic puppet play first performed in 1748)</gloss>

Macron added

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>performance or narrative based on the story of the Forty-seven Ronin (esp. the Kanadehon Chushingura, an epic puppet play first performed in 1748)</gloss>
+<gloss>performance or narrative based on the story of the Forty-seven Ronin (esp. the Kanadehon Chūshingura, an epic puppet play first performed in 1748)</gloss>

rejecting this, accepting jim's

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破</xref>
+<xref type="see">踏破</xref>

koj, daij, gg5, etc.

yup.  'to travel'

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>踏破る</keb>
@@ -13,1 +16,10 @@
-<gloss>to break by stepping on. to trample. to stomp on.</gloss>
+<gloss>to break by stepping on</gloss>
+<gloss>to trample</gloss>
+<gloss>to stomp on</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破</xref>
+<gloss>to walk across</gloss>
+<gloss>to travel on foot</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/踏破る

I was searching for "fumi" as in "Seto Fumi Furikake"

and I don't find it in the dictionary here, but the definition for

踏み破る

stood out as wrong to me ("to travel" ???)

@@ -13,2 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>to walk across</gloss>
-<gloss>to travel on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>to break by stepping on. to trample. to stomp on.</gloss>

@@ -20,3 +20,6 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破・とうは・1</xref>
-<gloss>to walk across</gloss>
-<gloss>to travel on foot</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破・1</xref>
+<gloss>to walk (all the way) across</gloss>
+<gloss>to traverse (on foot)</gloss>
+<gloss>to travel through</gloss>
+<gloss>to hike across</gloss>

Daijirin, GG5

Both refs support the second sense.

@@ -13,1 +13,12 @@
-<gloss>to break by stepping on. to trample. to stomp on.</gloss>
+<gloss>to break by stepping on</gloss>
+<gloss>to trample</gloss>
+<gloss>to stomp on</gloss>
+<gloss>to stamp through</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破・とうは・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破・とうは</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619760">踏破・とうは・1</xref>
+<gloss>to walk across</gloss>
+<gloss>to travel on foot</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/踏破る

I was searching for "fumi" as in "Seto Fumi Furikake"

and I don't find it in the dictionary here, but the definition for

踏み破る

stood out as wrong to me ("to travel" ???)

@@ -13,2 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>to walk across</gloss>
-<gloss>to travel on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>to break by stepping on. to trample. to stomp on.</gloss>

@@ -85,1 +85,2 @@
-<gloss>to pull the ball (i.e. pull hitting in baseball)</gloss>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>to pull the ball</gloss>

good catch

Just a typo/lack of punctuation in:
 [4][v5r,vt]
  to drag; to *haulto* tow

@@ -45,1 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>to haulto tow</gloss>
+<gloss>to haul</gloss>
+<gloss>to tow</gloss>

Me too.

I agree with deletion

i could go either way (leaning towards deletion), but the current gloss is a command, not an adjective

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>speak English well</gloss>
+<gloss>good at English</gloss>

Delete?

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

jim beat me by a couple of minutes

'crushing underfoot' is lacking from all my refs.  nikkoku has it, but i'm guessing it's an 'original meaning' type thing.  not sure if it should be kept at all

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>crushing underfoot</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>crushing underfoot</gloss>

OK

It shouldn't be tagged as both transitive and intransitive. It's one or the other depending on how you define transitivity in Japanese.
Given that this always takes を (unlike 歩く, for example), I think it's easier to make a case for vt.

@@ -18,4 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>walking through (a difficult and long path)</gloss>
-<gloss>travelling (the full distance) on foot</gloss>
-<gloss>travelling (all the way) across</gloss>
+<gloss>travelling (a long and difficult journey) on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>walking (all the way) across</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

sorry didn't read the old comments
i think the new gloss is definitely useful, not sure about the transitive/intransitive discussion

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, obunsha, senkoku

i don't think the second sense is needed
the majority of kokugos say it's transitive

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>walking through (a difficult and long path)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5 has "highly destructive earthquake", which I prefer.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>highly deadly earthquake</gloss>
+<gloss>highly destructive earthquake</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>highly deadly earthquake</gloss>

See 震災 entry. More likely to refer to 2011 today.

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1811760">関東大震災</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>Great Kanto earthquake (1923)</gloss>

Best as the leading gloss.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes also refers to a lunisolar calendar</s_inf>
+<gloss>lunisolar calendar</gloss>

I feel that the note isn't a note on usage but should be a gloss or a separate sense.

曆 appears to be illegal in wwwjdic:
 太陰暦; 太陰(oK) 【たいいんれき】 (n) (sometimes also refers to a lunisolar 
calendar) (See 太陰太陽暦) lunar calendar [G][GI][S][A][W] [JW] [G][GI][S][A][W] [JW]

@@ -6,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>太陰曆</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

-"of" was meant to be "or"?
-probably ok rather than ik since all dictionaries have that reading
-koj doesn't merge 智者 and 知者 for the ちしゃ and daijs has a restriction (but daijr has them together), so senses probably need to be split with at least a note

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -23,1 +23,8 @@
-<gloss>enlightened priest of Boddhisatva</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<s_inf>esp. 智者</s_inf>
+<gloss>buddha</gloss>
+<gloss>bodhisattva</gloss>
+<gloss>enlightened priest</gloss>

koj daij

@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちさ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15,1 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>a sage</gloss>
+<gloss>sage</gloss>
+<gloss>wise man</gloss>
+<gloss>wise person</gloss>
+<gloss>man of wisdom</gloss>
+<gloss>enlightened priest of Boddhisatva</gloss>

Already there.

to enamdict

@@ -19,0 +19,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホトトギス</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホトトギスソウ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

No.

any reason this isn't together with 草?

Entry created

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Mary Celeste, famous British ship found in 1872 without crew or passengers</gloss>
+<gloss>Mary Celeste</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">famous British ship found in 1872 without crew or passengers</gloss>

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マリーセレスト</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マリーセレステ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,6 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マリーセレスト</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マリーセレステ</reb>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Mary Celeste, famous British ship found in 1872 without crew or passengers.</gloss>
+<gloss>Mary Celeste, famous British ship found in 1872 without crew or passengers</gloss>

Just adding the name alone.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>grass and hay (as fodder for horses, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>grass and straw (as fodder for horses, etc.)</gloss>

koj, daij

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>type of popular literature from the late Edo period</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>yomihon (type of popular literature from the late Edo period)</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/読本

Koj, GG5, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>Ōmetsuke</gloss>
-<gloss>a kind of government inspector in the Edo period</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(government) inspector-general (Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>upper superintendent officer</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ōmetsuke

Moved to enamdict.

It seems that a Google search lists the hiragana as すいめいそう, with a final long o. However, a kanji search gives a short そ as pronunciation...

gg5

gg5 daij koj

I agree, and have done that. This can be rejected when that is approved.

merge into 戯談[じょうだん] as ok readings?

nikk

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr/s: 「笑い話。」
koj: 「②たわむれのものがたり。冗談。」
nikk: 「…また、その話。」

Seems like the second sense is just a noun

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

No

Do we need to explain the Japanese name?

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 (the epicenter was located on Awaji island)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Great Kobe earthquake of 1995 (the epicenter was located on Awaji island)</gloss>
+<gloss>the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 (the epicenter was located on Awaji island)</gloss>

typo

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>Great Kobe earthquake of 1995 (the epicenter was located on Awayji island)</gloss>
+<gloss>Great Kobe earthquake of 1995 (the epicenter was located on Awaji island)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス