reverso

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>above</gloss>
-<gloss>anymore</gloss>
+<gloss>above (that)</gloss>
+<gloss>greater (than that)</gloss>
+<gloss>any more</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス

Feel free to tidy up PoS and gloss. :-)

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>それ以上の</keb>
+<keb>それ以上</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>それいじょうの</reb>
+<reb>それいじょう</reb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>above</gloss>
+<gloss>anymore</gloss>

Fork.

I disagree. I don't rhink the most literal 
meaning is necessarily the beat. I think 
"sports day", "field day" will be 
thebetter translation in probably more 
cases than not.

gg5 has field day, etc. but personally i think both of the 'day' entries should be removed.  会 = meet, not day.  for 'field day', eijiro has 運動会の日、体育大会日

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>sports day</gloss>
-<gloss>field day</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>athletic meet</gloss>
+<gloss>athletic meet (esp. at school)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>field day</gloss>

@@ -18,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>athletic meet, sports day</gloss>
+<gloss>athletic meet</gloss>
+<gloss>sports day</gloss>

Harmless, but not exactly idiomatic English (at least to me.)

It's also often referred to as "sports festival" in official translations of Japanese media

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>sports festival</gloss>

FWIW, to me it sounds very natural to use "field day" to refer to both the day and the event.

If we're including "sports day" we should have the AmE equivalent as well. I've read the discussion below and I agree with Marcus that the "day" glosses are perfectly valid.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>athletic meet (esp. at school)</gloss>
+<gloss>athletic meet (esp. at a school)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>field day</gloss>

Er, no.

@@ -43 +43 @@
-<gloss>to curry favour with</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry favour with</gloss>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, nc, eij

x-ref to 採り込む, restricted sense

@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2648060">採り込む</xref>
@@ -25,0 +27,8 @@
+<gloss>to bring in</gloss>
+<gloss>to adopt (e.g. behaviour)</gloss>
+<gloss>to introduce</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -26,1 +36,20 @@
-<gloss>to introduce</gloss>
+<gloss>to import</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to win over</gloss>
+<gloss>to please</gloss>
+<gloss>to curry favour with</gloss>
+<gloss>to flatter</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to defraud of</gloss>
+<gloss>to swindle</gloss>
+<gloss>to embezzle</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,1 +57,2 @@
-<gloss>to adopt (e.g. behavior)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in confusion</gloss>
+<gloss>to have trouble</gloss>

Hi, I have seen in other dictionaries the additional meanings "to be confused" and "to have trouble".

Indeed

Actually, this should be in a different entry.

@@ -15,4 +14,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>取込</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

取込	41390

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取込</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, nc, eij

x-ref to 採り込む, restricted sense

@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2648060">採り込む</xref>
@@ -25,0 +27,8 @@
+<gloss>to bring in</gloss>
+<gloss>to adopt (e.g. behaviour)</gloss>
+<gloss>to introduce</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -26,1 +36,20 @@
-<gloss>to introduce</gloss>
+<gloss>to import</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to win over</gloss>
+<gloss>to please</gloss>
+<gloss>to curry favour with</gloss>
+<gloss>to flatter</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to defraud of</gloss>
+<gloss>to swindle</gloss>
+<gloss>to embezzle</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,1 +57,2 @@
-<gloss>to adopt (e.g. behavior)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in confusion</gloss>
+<gloss>to have trouble</gloss>

'concerning' seems like a pretty odd conjunction

surely gg5 has some better suggestions?

@@ -11,1 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1331510">就いては</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
@@ -13,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>concerning, in line with this, therefore</gloss>
+<gloss>in line with this</gloss>
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/つきましては/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>concerning</gloss>
+<gloss>concerning, in line with this, therefore</gloss>

Rejected and replaced with a fresh submission. I hav ealso asked Leonie for refs.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>代償</keb>
+<keb>代償満足</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>だいしょう</reb>
+<reb>だいしょうまんぞく</reb>
@@ -18,5 +18,1 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>compensation</gloss>
-<gloss>indemnification</gloss>
-<gloss>reparation</gloss>
-<gloss>consideration</gloss>
+<gloss>vicarious satisfaction</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is needed. ねたむ is far more common.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2835348">嫉む・そねむ</xref>

Yes! Fell off a couple of years ago.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>

Should the reading have the [ichi1] frequency tag?

that's a kanwa-dictionary entry, because フン is used in compounds

@@ -17,0 +17,3 @@
+<reb>フン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>

Daij, リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro, etc.

Much more common form.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>支払手形</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>bill or note payable</gloss>
+<gloss>bill payable</gloss>
+<gloss>note payable</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lay_brother
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother_(Christian)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_formation#Jesuit_brothers
http://jesuits.ca/aboutus?PAGE=DTN-20140703124926

irmão literally means brother

@@ -25 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>non-ordained monk</gloss>
+<gloss>brother</gloss>
+<gloss>lay brother</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">non-ordained member of a Christian religious order</gloss>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>non-ordained Christian monk</gloss>
+<gloss>non-ordained monk</gloss>

daijs

modern version given as 助修士 or 平修道士 in daijs 
(neither's currently an entry)

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<s_inf>early Japanese Christian term</s_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>ken (1.818 m, 6 shaku)</gloss>
+<gloss>ken (6 shaku, approx. 1.818 m)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

The JEs usually gloss it as "ken".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>1.818 m (6 shaku)</gloss>
+<gloss>ken (1.818 m, 6 shaku)</gloss>

1 ken is not 6 jou(3.03m), but 6 shaku(0.303m)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>1.818 m (6 jou)</gloss>
+<gloss>1.818 m (6 shaku)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1612900">にも拘わらず</xref>

Entry created

Yes.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Seems like this should be marked as a common word.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>indicates question (sentence end)</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates question</gloss>

Well, I suppose it doesn't hurt.

daijirin has it.  whether or not it's really necessary here is a different matter though

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">てもいい・1</xref>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">てもいい・2</xref>

てもいい	11211746
ていい	13884078
ても良い	3004632
てもよい	1408478
て良い	3483693
てよい	1645465

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.
Needs splitting

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>て良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5 +8 @@
-<reb>てもいい</reb>
+<reb>ていい</reb>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>ていい</reb>
+<reb>てよい</reb>
@@ -12,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +24,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(after the ren'youkei form of a verb) indicates concession or compromise</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the ren'youkei form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates concession or compromise</gloss>

PoS fix.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

i guess we'll leave it in for now then?

'e.g.,' -> 'e.g.'

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>agile, flexible (e.g., of corporate management)</gloss>
+<gloss>agile, flexible (e.g. of corporate management)</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

I guess this sneaks in.

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>nimble</gloss>
+<gloss>quick to respond</gloss>

OK, I'll drop the iK, and add it to Kanjidic.

@@ -6,1 +6,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

i don't know.  kanjigen and the kojien kanwa both have のむ as a reading.  (kanjidic doesn't though)

Can we say "iK"? 喫 doesn't really have a reading of の.む. It's a recent creation from 喫煙.

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

i'm not fussy

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to smoke tobacco</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1169870">飲む・2</xref>
+<gloss>to smoke (tobacco)</gloss>

My preference would be to have a solo entry.I don't like those explanations that much, especially when they hide headwords. Here, I had not noticed that this was already in EDICT. A search for 喫む on wwwjdic did not bring it up.

庶妹 from koj

arch?
could 母の違う妹 also refer to a half-sister in addition to this (or instead of this)?

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>庶妹</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Daijirin

Dunno

see submission for ままいも.  could this also/instead refer to half-sisters?

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/月光条例   WWW pages

For "stepsister" none of the EJs have a single term. 継 + 姉/妹 seems obvious. Only 継妹 is in Daijirin, but 継姉 gets more hits.

See 2759290.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>

GG5 (in example)

Extremely common.

eij has it

Kagakujiten, リーダーズ+プラス

Not very common. Useful.

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>きょうかがらす</reb>
+<reb>きょうかガラス</reb>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

Eijiro, LSD, etc.

Very common.

Eijiro, Tanaka

Quite common

adding 'amorphous' from eijiro

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>amorphous</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス和英辞典, Kagaku

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

gg5

Daijs has "のれんを―・げて店に入ってくる" as an example sentence for 撥ね上げる so it seems the restriction isn't needed.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to splash</gloss>
+<gloss>to splash (up)</gloss>
+<gloss>to spatter</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<stagk>跳ね上げる</stagk>

Merging 1679820.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はね上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>撥ね上げる</keb>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<stagk>跳ね上げる</stagk>
@@ -25 +32 @@
-<gloss>to raise sharply</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise sharply (e.g. prices)</gloss>

sankoku, eijiro

Added sense.

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to churn up</gloss>
-<gloss>to strike up</gloss>
-<gloss>to throw up</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw up (e.g. mud)</gloss>
+<gloss>to splash</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to flip up</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,6 @@
-<gloss>to flip up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to raise sharply</gloss>
+<gloss>to hike</gloss>

Suggesting this instead of adding an entry for 跳ね上げ窓.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>top-hinged (e.g. window)</gloss>

Eijiro

Very common (300k Googits, 2M Yahoots)

GG5, LSD

and ポーティコ from koj, and ポルティコ from infoseek katakana

sorted by hits

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポルティコ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポーティコ</reb>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>

GG5, LSD, 新和英中辞典, etc.

LSD, Kagaku, Eijiro

GG5, LSD, Eijiro

GG5, LSD, Kagaku, Eijiro

i think it's fine too

I should have left this open for discussion.

I discussed this with Leonie Stickland (a professional JE translator). She quoted the blog at http://takkie-english.way-nifty.com/blog/2009/03/vicarious-5956.html which discussion use of "vicarious". 
I'll accept her submission - I think it's good to push the boundaries a bit with entries like this.

This is Leonie's rejected submission. I'll email her for references.

only 28 google hits

i just accepted 非侵襲的, and submitted 分子イメージング as new entry.  this is an obvious construction from those two, so i think it should be rejected

eij

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>traditional ceremony where the newly-wed wife, upon entering her new home, was hit on the rump with a straw bundle etc., to ensure her fertility</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>traditional ceremony where the newly-wed wife, upon entering her new home, is hit on the rump with a straw bundle etc., to ensure her fertility</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2770350">嫁の尻叩き</xref>

nikk, daij

nothing wrong with the original gloss, but I wrote this up 
without first checking whether it was already an entry - 
it's a little more detailed, and I think "hit" might be more 
adequate than "spank" (to me, this conjures up an image of 
the wife lying on somebody's lap)
__
the ceremony might be "archaic", but is the word itself not 
merely historic? (not sure though!)

@@ -20,2 +20,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>ritual spanking of a new bride to encourage fertility</gloss>
+<gloss>traditional ceremony where the newly-wed wife, upon entering her new home, was hit on the rump with a straw bundle etc., to ensure her fertility</gloss>