| 7. |
A 2021-05-31 04:46:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
日米豪印 1197
日米豪印戦略対話 < 20 |
| |
Comments: |
I wouldn't object to 日米豪印 in JMdict as a noun. Not uncommon. |
| 6. |
A* 2021-05-26 10:53:43 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日米豪印戦略対話
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_Security_Dialogue |
| |
Comments: |
日米豪印 on its own is a noun, but the "Quad" (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue) is 日米豪印戦略対話. I don't think we need 日米豪印 as a noun entry.
This should be updated once the [group] name type is added. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>日米豪印</keb>
+<keb>日米豪印戦略対話</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にちべいごういん</reb>
+<reb>にちべいごういんせんりゃくたいわ</reb>
@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Japan, the United States, Australia and India</gloss>
+<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<gloss>Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (strategic dialogue between Japan, the United States, Australia and India)</gloss> |
| 5. |
A* 2021-05-26 02:09:31 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Comments: |
Sorry, that was a mistake on my part. It was meant for jmdict. |
| 4. |
A* 2021-05-26 01:30:50 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Was this intended for jmnedict? Because we don't usually use [n] here, do we? |
| 3. |
A 2021-05-26 00:02:02 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A* 2021-05-25 22:20:22 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQODE10DAP0Q1A310C2000000/ |
| 1. |
A* 2021-05-25 22:19:23 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Refs: |
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/5d231715485c95f4d995e5bb1fc4f6d29aadfcc4
日米豪印 1197
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral_Security_Dialogue |
| |
Comments: |
The political-military alliance du jour. |